Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Marc Abrams

:{{pagelinks|Draft:Marc Abrams}}

no conceivable notability here -- no chance of an article DGG ( talk ) 08:12, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

• Delete and put it out of its misery. As a note, this is (practically speaking) G13-eligible, as the most recent edit wasn't really anything but a bot edit to change some disambiguation. Primefac (talk) 17:43, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
• Comment: I don't think that was a bot. That edit was JavaScript–assisted. {{Large|{{ping|Onel5969|p=,}} you are being referred to.}} Though I think he was using the script from the "New York" disambiguation page, not the draft. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  14:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

::I know, that's why I included the "practically" - it's not a true bot edit, but the lack of substance in the edit itself kind of nullifies it. I think even as a not-G13-eligible draft, it's still not worth keeping. Primefac (talk) 18:44, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

• Delete as per G13 - {{u|Mr. Guye}} was spot on. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per G13 per everything above, including my comment. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  16:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.