Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AJ DONUTS/sandbox/Drake

{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{mfd top collapse|1=Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AJ DONUTS/sandbox/Drake}}|}}

__NOINDEX__

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. plicit 14:34, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

==[[:User:AJ DONUTS/sandbox/Drake]]==

:{{pagelinks|1=User:AJ DONUTS/sandbox/Drake}} – (View MfD)

Duplicate copy of our article about Drake, which appears to exist solely to provide an editable content fork because of the mainspace page's current semiprotection status. So far, the creator's primary interest appears to be imposing non-standard page formatting variations (like replacing {{Official website}} with [https://drakerelated.com Official website], and incorrectly moving the infobox so that it starts in line with the second paragraph of text instead of the first) without providing any reason why those changes would be warranted -- but there are obvious WP:BLP sensitivities around Drake ever since the Kendrick feud last year, which an unlocked content fork of a semi-protected article could potentially be misused to circumvent. So a full duplicate copy of the existing article should not be unlocked at an alternate title without a much stronger justification for it than just wanting to muck around with page layout. Bearcat (talk) 16:32, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{collapse bottom}}|}}