Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Joe-thomasch/Enter your new article name here

:{{pagelinks|User:Joe-thomasch/Enter your new article name here}}

Stale userspace draft, both of owner's 2 edits were to this page, hasn't edited since (8 years), no claim of notability DannyS712 (talk) 00:48, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

• Speedy keep WP:SK#1, no valid reason to delete. Retitle to “China toy expo” Ignore, or if you can’t, {{tl|Inactive userpage blanked}} was made for you. Messing with others’ userspace is bad enough, deleting their userspace pages is worst. It benefits no one and is a rude discovery for the. On their return. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:34, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

• Delete could go G11 and reads like copyvio actually. Topic is likely notable but this nedds TNT Legacypac (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
• The page is not problematically promotional, and google shows me the company is plausibly notable. I oppose deletion, including TNT. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete - If an editor returns and asks for their stuff back, we can tell them where Requests for Undeletion is. The fact that they didn't request AFC review shouldn't make their stuff immortal. Do you want the stuff draftified? That would be another possibility. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
• Delete, possibly speedy delete This is a stale draft that may be a copyright violation. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 13:47, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
• Keep - Blanking with {{tl|inactive userspace blanked}} per WP:STALEDRAFT is fine if editors feel action is warranted. No reason to delete or discuss here; or, speedy delete if it is a copyvio. — Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 06:54, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.