Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Madhollo/Nature of Everything (NOE) Hypothesis

:{{pagelinks|User:Madhollo/Nature of Everything (NOE) Hypothesis}}

Abandoned WP:FRINGE WP:STALEDRAFT in userpage. Yet another crackpot Theory of Everything. jni ^(delete)_{...just not interested} 19:28, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a means of promoting and legitimizing fringe theories. MER-C 07:06, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

174.1.196.107 (talk) 19:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)This is not a crackpot theory of everything, since it was intended to be tied to the Blavatsky and Bailey pages. It stated in modern scientific terms what their writings stated.

:Anon, please note that pseudoscience or fringe theories must receive significant, independent coverage in order to be notable enough for Wikipedia. Original research (see WP:NOR) made-up by Wikipedia editor, even if it is supposedly sourced, does not qualify. Blavatsky and Bailey theosophical sources also very likely don't even support your "new physics" in any way. Note that the main reference of this crackpottery is Holloway, Madonna-Megara, "A New Cosmological Model for Matter, Energy, Sound, the Origin of the Universe and Gravity" and user name is Madhollo. jni ^(delete)_{...just not interested} 16:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. and per WP:No original research. JohnCD (talk) 22:47, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.