Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MooshiePorkFace/Patrick Alain

:{{pagelinks|User:MooshiePorkFace/Patrick Alain}}

:{{pagelinks|User:WizardlyWho/draftJS}}

:{{pagelinks|User:MooshiePorkFace/0}}

:{{pagelinks|User:MooshiePorkFace/00}}

:{{pagelinks|User:Ninjajy/sandbox}}

:{{pagelinks|User:Frank464/sandbox}}

:{{pagelinks|User:MooshiePorkFace/Grammarly}}

:{{pagelinks|User:Alphawrite/OMF, Options Market France}}

Promotional WP:FAKEARTICLEs by a paid sockpuppeteer with no intention to contribute to the encyclopedia constructively, see WP:AN#Elance paid editing ban proposal. MER-C 08:21, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

• Delete and snow close - Per WP:STALEDRAFT which additionally are fake articles. Where WP:G5 "Creations by banned or blocked users" doesn't apply, we still can snow close. As noted at the above WP:AN, all the sources look OK at face value. However, it turns out that they are a result of a "clear dishonesty and attempts to present PR guff as legitimate sourcing, and constant attempts to evade scrutiny (currently at 34 socks)." Honesty in sourcing is critical to deletion discussions. The sooner we act to delete these, the more we discourage such behaviour. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 11:26, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
• Delete as the fruits of blatantly disruptive behavior. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:29, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
• 'Delete as above. Are you also going to delete http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Patrick_Alain.jpg ?--Toddy1 (talk) 06:28, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

:*Nice catch. I won't take any action on this now -- have a look at the global usage. MER-C 08:23, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.