Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Peristome/UserBox/GodMMAtheist
{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{mfd top collapse|1=Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Peristome/UserBox/GodMMAtheist}}|}}
__NOINDEX__
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) ObserveOwl (talk) 09:29, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
==[[:User:Peristome/UserBox/GodMMAtheist]]==
:{{pagelinks|1=User:Peristome/UserBox/GodMMAtheist}}
This seems incredibly disrespectful to religious people and almost taunting them. I'd suggest delete because there is no reason (Wikipedia can survive if all userboxes were deleted) for userboxes to exist and its taunting religious people by claiming that god made X user atheist, and they cant do anything about it. DotesConks (talk) 02:05, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Wikipedians are allowed to say all kinds of stupid things about themselves. We are not generally in the user-thought censoring business. BusterD (talk) 02:12, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - probably not quite antagonistic enough to be disruptive, but makes me think we need a high-level :Category:Edgelord Wikipedians to put this stuff in. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:14, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Strong keep. The Userbox Migration (aka the German Userbox Solution)—that is, allowing things like this to exist but in userspace rather than Wikipedia: or Template: space (to make it clear they don't have official endorsement)—was Wikipedia:Userbox migration#Related discussions. Yes, a discussion that took place eighteen years ago is maybe worth revisiting, but an obscure MfD is not the place to do so. Overruling the result of multiple massive discussions that involved everyone from Arbcom to Jimmy Wales—and which has been settled consensus for approaching two decades—would at minimum need a well-advertised central discussion. ‑ Iridescent 15:25, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep, because this is sarcastic humor and does not imply anything negative about religious people. I2Overcome talk 23:18, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{collapse bottom}}|}}