Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/OpenNote

{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{mfd top collapse|1=Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/OpenNote}}|}}

__NOINDEX__

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was mark as historical. There is a rough consensus for this, and there is clearly no consensus to delete the page. (NACArmbrust The Homunculus 15:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

==[[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/OpenNote]]==

:{{pagelinks|Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/OpenNote}}

Deprecated since June 2011, no transclusions. Debresser (talk) 05:27, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

  • May be better to mark this as historical. --BDD (talk) 19:13, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Historical, or alternatively, did you ask the MC what they thought about it? Daniel (talk) 06:36, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

:: I had not done that. Made up for that [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Mediation_Committee&diff=588339787&oldid=573880827 now]. Debresser (talk) 08:22, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

  • The page (it is hardly a template) is already marked as deprecated, so leave as is. As the 'template' is designed to be substituted during use, that there are no transclusions does not mean it is not being used. AGK [•] 11:22, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion|{{collapse bottom}}|}}