Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2008 March 10

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Used "on behalf of skyscrapercity.com" and declared as public domain. Clearly a picture scanned from a real estate brochure and uploaded without permission. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 06:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Used "on behalf of skyscrapercity.com" and declared as public domain. Clearly a picture scanned from a real estate brochure and uploaded without permission. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 06:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Used "on behalf of skyscrapercity.com" and declared as public domain. Clearly a picture scanned from a real estate brochure and uploaded without permission. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 06:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

To be used for educational purposes only. Nv8200p talk 02:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

To be used for educational purposes only. Nv8200p talk 02:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

To be used for educational purposes only. Nv8200p talk 02:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

To be used for educational purposes only. Nv8200p talk 02:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence image was released under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 02:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Copyrighted image originally from NBC, CC license not valid. Polly (Parrot) 02:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

A logo of a police force, no evidence the GNU license is applicable. Polly (Parrot) 03:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Logo of a police force, not the uploaders to release into the public domain Polly (Parrot) 03:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by {{admin|Bibliomaniac15}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Image is taken from a copyrighted website, the GNU licese is not applicable. Polly (Parrot) 03:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

::Comment The user has uploaded a lot of copyrighted content and I'm about to add the speedy delete to it. -- Bidgee (talk) 16:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The link to the flickr page states the image is copyrighted, the CC license is not correct. Polly (Parrot) 03:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Flickr page says all rights reserved, CC license is not correct. Polly (Parrot) 03:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Flickr page says all rights reserved. CC license is incorrect Polly (Parrot) 03:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Flickr page says all rights reserved. CC license is incorrect. Polly (Parrot) 03:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Nv8200p}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Flickr page says all rights reserved. CC license is incorrect Polly (Parrot) 03:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Police logo, no evidence that the GNU license is correct. Polly (Parrot) 03:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:Comment actually, there is very strong evidence that the license is incorrect! Almost all images uploaded by this user are taken from this website which clearly indicates that the images are not in the public domain. [http://www.nt.gov.au/ntg/disclaimer.html http://www.nt.gov.au/ntg/disclaimer.html] Pascal.Tesson (talk) 15:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I2 by {{admin|Bibliomaniac15}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Flickr licensing indicates for non-commercial use only. Incorrect CC license has been added. Polly (Parrot) 03:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I realize the creative commons licensing does not allow images to be used for commercial purposes, but the article is not an advertisement for the theatre, but rather an informative article that is simply enhanced by the photo. in my opinion, the image does not , in any way serve the business of the palm theatre.

Jordanadavis (talk) 06:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Jordanadavis

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I9 by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Uploader claims to be owner of the image, yet it appears on the person's IMDB photo gallery. See[http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3145240832/nm1205293] — 218.186.12.9 (talk) 05:47, 10 March 2008 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Stifle}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of GFDL in the source. Rettetast (talk) 11:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

orphaned, low quality, no evidence of pd release as claimed Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:22, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Rettetast}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Not official material in the sense of {{tl|PD-SerbiaGov}} Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Stifle}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

copied from Croatian wikipedia, pd status doubtful, has what seems to be a commercial copyright notice on the image, no evidence of pd release Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Stifle}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of pd release Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Stifle}} A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of release under cc-by Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:This is a Commons image and needs to be dealt with over there. Stifle (talk) 10:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Stifle}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Probably an historical press photo, no evidence of pd release Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Stifle}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

No evidence of release under cc-by Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:This is a Commons image and needs to be dealt with over there. Stifle (talk) 10:08, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by {{admin|East718}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged {{tl|Attribution}}. Source site says "We do grant permission to download our photos if you include a link back to www.RemarkableCars.com", but it does not say anything about redistribution, derivative work and commercial use. See also Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2007 October 17#Image:1948-gmc-archives.jpg Rettetast (talk) 12:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The uploader seems to be the same person who takes pictures for the site. Undeath (talk) 21:31, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

::This is a Commons image and needs to be dealt with over there. Stifle (talk) 10:08, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by {{admin|Bibliomaniac15}} A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged {{cc-by-3.0}}, but Flickr source page [http://flickr.com/photos/artarama/858621645/] says it's licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 Generic. "Noncommercial" is not free enough for Wikipedia, and there is no evidence this image was ever licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. —Bkell (talk) 13:58, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Stifle}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

There's no evidence that the Utah state government releases images to the public domain, and the copyright notice on the image directly contradicts the PD claim. Mosmof (talk) 15:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I6 by {{admin|Melesse}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This would be copyright by Universal Studios and there is no evidence provided that the image was released under the GFDL. Nv8200p talk 16:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Stifle}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

This image is a scan from a magazine published in Japan. It is not properly tagged on Flickr, and has digital watermarking as well as overlaid text found in the magazine. — Jacob ^Talk 17:45, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I8 by {{admin|Kurykh}} A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

The image is a screenshot of a game which is possibly abandonware. Need proof of this. If it is, then noone holds the copyright and license is invalid because the image uploader would not hold the copyright. Rockfang (talk) 18:07, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The screen shot is one that I took of a game that I programmed using tiles that I drew myself. What is the procedure at this point to resolve the issue? Do I need to choose a different choice in the license dropdown? Capmango (talk) 06:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

::Kept - satisfied that uploader holds copyright. Stifle (talk) 10:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I3 by {{admin|Skier Dude}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Text says it is copyrighted with all rights reserved, therefore the pd-self tag is incorrect. Hut 8.5 18:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Stifle}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Text says it is copyrighted with all rights reserved despite pd-self tag Hut 8.5 18:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Stifle}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover, probably copyrighted. Hut 8.5 19:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Stifle}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover, probably copyrighted. Hut 8.5 19:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Future Perfect at Sunrise}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Tagged pd-self, but is a sketch of a composer who died in 1907. Hut 8.5 19:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by {{admin|Stifle}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Looks like a publicity shot, uploader unlikely to hold the copyright Polly (Parrot) 19:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

:The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as I1 by {{admin|PhilKnight}} AnomieBOT⚡ 01:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Magazine cover, unlikely to be covered by a CC license. Polly (Parrot) 19:52, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.