Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 April 13#1492805156
=April 13=
==Talk:Moody’s Analytics Knowledge Service==
:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
:The result of the discussion was delete
- {{no redirect|1 = Talk:Moody’s Analytics Knowledge Service }} → :Talk:Moody's Analytics Knowledge Services (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Moody%E2%80%99s_Analytics_Knowledge_Service&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2017-03-14&end=2017-04-12&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Talk%3AMoody%E2%80%99s_Analytics_Knowledge_Service stats])
[ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Talk:Moody’s Analytics Knowledge Service|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Talk:Moody’s Analytics Knowledge Service closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Talk:Moody’s Analytics Knowledge Service|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Talk:Moody’s Analytics Knowledge Service closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Talk:Moody’s Analytics Knowledge Service|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Talk:Moody’s Analytics Knowledge Service closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ]
Speedy deletion was declined with "Just an ordinary talk redirect" for the reason. However, Moody’s Analytics Knowledge Service does not exist, so G8 was supposed to apply. Should the talk page redirect be deleted, or should the corresponding subject page be created? GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep; it's {{tl|R from move}}, and we gain no benefit from deleting it. Nyttend (talk) 23:39, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Eligible for {{Tl|Db-talk}} since its parent page doesn't exist. So, per nom. Steel1943 (talk) 23:47, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Also, per the redirect's edit history, it should be eligible per {{Tl|Db-g6}} as the creator seemed to create it in error per "UGH". In fact, I'd even say that this redirect may even be eligible for {{Tl|Db-g7}} per the nominator's comment. Steel1943 (talk) 23:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.