Login
Login

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 17#1556163399

{{rfd log header|2019|April 16|2019|April 18}}

=[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 17|April 17]]=

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 17, 2019.

==Tropical Storm Toraji(2007)==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:36, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Here are some more tropical storm related redirects with a spacing error before the disambiguator. -- Tavix (talk) 20:16, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete the whole lot as implausible search terms. JIP | Talk 20:28, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete all Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:34, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete all, not useful. PC78 (talk) 21:16, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete all of them. CycloneYoris talk! 02:08, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Unexpected Love (2016 film)==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:36, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Unexpected Love (2016 film) }} → :Unexpected Love (upcoming film)  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unexpected_Love_(2016_film)&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-03-18&end=2019-04-16&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unexpected_Love_%282016_film%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Unexpected Love (2016 film)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Unexpected Love (2016 film) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Unexpected Love (2016 film)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Unexpected Love (2016 film) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Unexpected Love (2016 film)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Unexpected Love (2016 film) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ]
  • {{no redirect|1 = Unexpected Love (2017 film) }} → :Unexpected Love (upcoming film)  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unexpected_Love_(2017_film)&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-03-18&end=2019-04-16&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unexpected_Love_%282017_film%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Unexpected Love (2017 film)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Unexpected Love (2017 film) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Unexpected Love (2017 film)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Unexpected Love (2017 film) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Unexpected Love (2017 film)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Unexpected Love (2017 film) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ]
  • {{no redirect|1 = Unexpected Love (2018 film) }} → :Unexpected Love (upcoming film)  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unexpected_Love_(2018_film)&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-03-18&end=2019-04-16&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Unexpected_Love_%282018_film%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Unexpected Love (2018 film)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Unexpected Love (2018 film) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Unexpected Love (2018 film)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Unexpected Love (2018 film) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Unexpected Love (2018 film)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Unexpected Love (2018 film) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

This film appears to have been struggling for a release since 2016 and the article just gets moved every year. Since it wasn't actually released in any of these years the redirects are misleading. PC78 (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Australian Royal==

File:White equals sign on grey rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was no consensus

. I do think we have consensus for a hatnote, though, so I've added one. --BDD (talk) 15:46, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Australian Royal }} → :Australian dollar#History  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Australian_Royal&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-02-28&end=2019-03-29&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Australian_Royal stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Australian Royal|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Australian Royal closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Australian Royal|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Australian Royal closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Australian Royal|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Australian Royal closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

May be confused with Monarchy of Australia B dash (talk) 09:00, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 18:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

  • Keep, but potentially hatnote to alleviate potential confusion. If someone is searching "Australian Royal", the most likely usage of that exact phrase would be the currency. I don't think they would be looking for the Monarchy or Monarch itself. To demonstrate, I think it's telling that similar redirects like British Royal and Canadian Royal, etc. don't exist. -- Tavix (talk) 15:09, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory (u • t • c) 14:18, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Iran Football's 1nd Division==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete.

--BDD (talk) 18:58, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Iran Football's 1nd Division }} → :Azadegan League  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iran_Football%27s_1nd_Division&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-03-18&end=2019-04-16&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Iran_Football%27s_1nd_Division stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Iran Football's 1nd Division|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Iran Football's 1nd Division closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Iran Football's 1nd Division|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Iran Football's 1nd Division closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Iran Football's 1nd Division|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Iran Football's 1nd Division closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Created by a relatively inactive user, over 3 years ago. Had one unnecessary inlink as a pipelink that named the target article, which I fixed to point at the target, so it is now no longer used. 1nd appears to be an unlikely misnomer for 1st (i.e. it should show the editor a redlink so they fix it). —[AlanM1(talk)]— 13:14, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete. No one is going to use "1nd" as a search term. JIP | Talk 13:32, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:08, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete as implausible. GiantSnowman 11:10, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==1nd Libyan Division Sibelle==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete.

--BDD (talk) 18:57, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = 1nd Libyan Division Sibelle }} → :1st Libyan Division Sibille  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1nd_Libyan_Division_Sibelle&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-03-18&end=2019-04-16&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=1nd_Libyan_Division_Sibelle stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:1nd Libyan Division Sibelle|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#1nd Libyan Division Sibelle closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:1nd Libyan Division Sibelle|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#1nd Libyan Division Sibelle closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:1nd Libyan Division Sibelle|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#1nd Libyan Division Sibelle closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Created 6 years ago, apparently by mistake. Has no inlinks. 1nd appears to be an unlikely misnomer for 1st (i.e. it should show the editor a redlink so they fix it). —[AlanM1(talk)]— 13:10, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete. No one is going to use "1nd" as a search term. JIP | Talk 13:32, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Assassin==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to Assassination. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 03:00, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Assassin }} → :Assassins  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Assassin&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-03-18&end=2019-04-16&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Assassin stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Assassin|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Assassin closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Assassin|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Assassin closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Assassin|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Assassin closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Assassin currently redirects to Assassins, an Islamic sect. However, pretty much every single incoming link (of which there are loads upon loads) is instead intended to mean assassination, the murder of a target for political, ideological or monetary reason. Therefore I propose changing the redirect to assassination. The page Assassins could perhaps also be moved to use the original Islamic spelling. JIP | Talk 11:50, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

  • Retarget to assassination per nom. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 12:08, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Retarget per nom. Thryduulf (talk) 18:19, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment I don't think Assassin and Assassins should be about different topics, but I agree the current set-up is not ideal. I think the best solution would be to move Assassins to Order of Assassins (WP:NATURAL), move Assassin (disambiguation) to Assassin with prominent links to Assassination and Order of Assassins, and retarget the resulting redirect at Assassins to the disambiguation. That way all the incoming links would then be picked up by WP:DPL. -- Tavix (talk) 18:36, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  • This sounds indeed like the best solution. Having the singular and multiple form of the same noun as different targets is usually wrong. I can only think of a single counterexample: Transformer (electrical device) vs. Transformers (robot toy franchise). Therefore it would be best to have Assassin and Assassins point to the same target, retain the article about political murder at Assassination and move the article about the Islamic sect to Order of Assassins. JIP | Talk 20:22, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Making Assassin a dab page is a terrible idea per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Pointing to the disambiguation page in a hatnote is enough. SpinningSpark 16:57, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Retarget per nom. I'd also support moving Assassins as well. PC78 (talk) 14:58, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Retarget per nom. I'm in two minds about retargeting Assassins. I get the point about them having different targets, but most of the many incoming links seem to be aimed at the correct target and it is less likely that if assassination was intended that the plural would be typed. A lot of links would need to be edited. It's been at that title for a long time, so there is also the risk of breaking external links. On balance I'm against retargetting that one. SpinningSpark 16:57, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==The Norwegian Civilian Marksmanship Association==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 25%23The Norwegian Civilian Marksmanship Association

==Interior solution==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 April 25%23Interior solution

==Portal:Education in Nepal==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete.

--BDD (talk) 18:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Portal:Education in Nepal }} → :Category:Education in Nepal  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portal:Education_in_Nepal&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-03-18&end=2019-04-16&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Portal%3AEducation_in_Nepal stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Portal:Education in Nepal|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Portal:Education in Nepal closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Portal:Education in Nepal|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Portal:Education in Nepal closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Portal:Education in Nepal|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Portal:Education in Nepal closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Delete as misleading cross-namespace redirect. Per WP:SURPRISE, when you click on a Portal, you expect to land on a portal. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:31, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:32, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Mouse Genome==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was withdrawn.

[Additional comments.] Citing (talk) 01:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Mouse Genome }} → :Mammalian Genome  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mouse_Genome&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-03-18&end=2019-04-16&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Mouse_Genome stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Mouse Genome|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Mouse Genome closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Mouse Genome|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Mouse Genome closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Mouse Genome|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Mouse Genome closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Users are unlikely to be searching for an academic journal with an entirely different name. Other genome redirects (chimpanzee genome, cow genome) go to more relevant pages. The search results on their own are more useful. Citing (talk) 04:07, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

  • Keep per "In 1998 the journal Mouse Genome was merged into Mammalian Genome." Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

:*Yeesh, don't know how I missed that.... Maybe I'll cobble together a stub for the article and toss a disambiguation link on top sometime.Citing (talk) 14:34, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Template:Three Men in a Boat==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. (non-admin closure) B dash (talk) 07:09, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Template:Three Men in a Boat }} → :Template:Jerome K. Jerome  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Three_Men_in_a_Boat&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-03-10&end=2019-04-08&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Template%3AThree_Men_in_a_Boat stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Template:Three Men in a Boat|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Template:Three Men in a Boat closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Template:Three Men in a Boat|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Template:Three Men in a Boat closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Template:Three Men in a Boat|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Template:Three Men in a Boat closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

I believe that this redirect should be deleted. The result of Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_March_16#Template:Three_Men_in_a_Boat was merge. However, when templates that I have created for similar subject areas have been up for discussion, the result has generally been to merge the content and delete the page. There is obviously a trivial edit history involved as an artifact, but that has not been an issue in similar TFD and CSD outcomes. N. B. Three Men in a Boat (1920 film) is the only article space use of this redirect and it should just be replaced by the target like all other uses have been.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:14, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

  • The following individuals were involved in the aforementioned TFD {{ping|BrownHairedGirl|JarrahTree|Legacypac|Chiswick Chap|JJMC89}}-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:21, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Neutral. I don't really care either way, but I see nothing in WP:RFD#DELETE to support deletion, and WP:RFD#KEEP.1 seem seems to support retention. But after the wikilawyering WP:OWNership shitstorm which TonyTheTiger created over the merger, I have already spent waaay too much time on this damn template, so do whatever. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:38, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Keep. The template was merged so the edit history should be retained. I don't see any basis for deletion. PC78 (talk) 16:43, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
  • I'm confused by this request Legacypac (talk) 09:13, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment nothing in article space should be using this redirect. So I don't see why its history is worth keeping. It seems counter to most other mergers of template content that I have seen.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 01:53, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 03:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

  • Weak keep I'm not familiar with the history here, and BHG's comment made me cartoonishly widen my eyes—I'm not sure I want to. Looking at this with uninvolved eyes, then, I see, I guess, a frequently adapted work as the redirect title. That makes me think it could have some usefulness. --BDD (talk) 18:40, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Hara (film)==

File:White i in purple rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was move

Hara (2014 film) over the redirect. (This accomplishes what Thryduulf suggested, and there was no article history.) --BDD (talk) 18:35, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Hara (film) }} → :Soundarya Rajinikanth  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hara_(film)&action=history history] · [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews?start=2019-03-10&end=2019-04-08&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Hara_%28film%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Hara (film)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Hara (film) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Hara (film)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Hara (film) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Hara (film)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Hara (film) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

As far as I can gather, Hara was an early title for Dheera which is a now-shelved film by this director. Given that this abandoned project isn't mentioned at all in the target article, I don't see how this redirect is useful, especially as it has no significant history. PC78 (talk) 14:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 03:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

  • Good call, I hadn't seen that article. PC78 (talk) 15:51, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.