Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 26#1612291986

• {{no redirect|1 = Wikipedia:ANC }} → :Wikipedia:WikiProject Shopping Centers/Anchors and tenants  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:ANC&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Wikipedia%3AANC stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:ANC|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Wikipedia:ANC closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:ANC|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Wikipedia:ANC closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:ANC|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Wikipedia:ANC closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

I think it would be helpful if this could be retargeted to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure, but perhaps the history of this redirect would make that inappropriate? Mdewman6 (talk) 21:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Support. Shortcuts should always be employed where they would be the most helpful. It's only been linked a handful of times since its creation in 2007, so I don't see any obvious barriers to retargeting. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
• Support, the project already has other better named shortcuts. Funandtrvl (talk) 15:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
• Retarget per nom. The redirect was depreciated and marked historical in 2018, only has 31 incoming links and it's not immediately obvious why it points at it's current target (I assume it means ANChors?). It seems it would be much better targeting the administrators noticeboard. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 16:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Clinton impeachment trials }} → :Impeachment of Bill Clinton#Senate trial  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clinton_impeachment_trials&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Clinton_impeachment_trials stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Clinton impeachment trials|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Clinton impeachment trials closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Clinton impeachment trials|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Clinton impeachment trials closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Clinton impeachment trials|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Clinton impeachment trials closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

This redirect is at best a {{tl|R from plural}} for Clinton impeachment trial, which targets a section at Impeachment of Bill Clinton. Since there was only one trial, I think the plural form here is inappropriate, unhelpfully clutters search results, and should be deleted. If kept, it should be recategorized with {{tl|R from plural}} and {{tl|R to section}}, as the current categories ({{tl|R from alternative name}} and {{tl|R printworthy}}) are inappropriate. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:30, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Keep - seems plausible to search for it in this way. Someone searching may not be totally familiar with the process. Definitely make the changes to the categories you suggest though. A7V2 (talk) 23:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Keep. This seems plausible and there have been almost 60 paveviews in the last year. CrazyBoy826 00:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
• :The high pageviews are likely due in part to the fact that the correct Clinton impeachment trial was only recently created (by me). Also, this page was originally a very poor stub that really should have been deleted in the first place rather than blanked and redirected. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
• Keep. Perfectly plausible for someone who isn't familiar with what happens - there hearings in both houses of congress that could easily be misunderstood as trials. That this was created before the singular, and was the location an article was created are both good indicators that this is a plausible search term. Thryduulf (talk) 01:02, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

::Perhaps then it would be best to untarget the redirect to the impeachment article in general (and then just categorize as {{tl|R from plural}})? Mdewman6 (talk) 01:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Derrogitives }} → :List of ethnic slurs  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Derrogitives&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-20&end=2021-01-18&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Derrogitives stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Derrogitives|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Derrogitives closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Derrogitives|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Derrogitives closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Derrogitives|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Derrogitives closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Either retarget to pejorative, where derogative targets, or delete as too many errors. [https://pageviews.toolforge.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=last-year&pages=Derrogitives 7 views] in the whole of 2020 suggest this isn't a common error. Hog Farm _Talk 05:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

• Retarget to Pejorative. The low hit count made me pause, but an all-time analysis shows 2020 to be on the low end of its hit range; this is definitely an uncommon search, but not a worthless one. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 07:01, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
• Retarget to Pejorative per Vaticidalprophet BlackholeWA (talk) 06:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Misspelling is way too uncommon for it to be worth keeping. CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Eevn wto pselinlg erorss is to mnay to make a redirect plausible. Narky Blert (talk) 20:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Dilletes: as unlikely. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:38, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• delete too many misspellings to be a plausible redirect --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:12, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delete, one-time error that seems to never have been replicated in the history of the searchable internet. All this does is crowd the searchbar occasionally; the pageviews are caused by robots surely. Note that deleting this redirect entails deleting article content... but hey, this isn't really enough quality, is it? — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 04:46, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Side Hustle (disambiguation) }} → :Side hustle (disambiguation)  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Side_Hustle_(disambiguation)&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Side_Hustle_%28disambiguation%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Side Hustle (disambiguation)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Side Hustle (disambiguation) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Side Hustle (disambiguation)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Side Hustle (disambiguation) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Side Hustle (disambiguation)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Side Hustle (disambiguation) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

I have moved this to Side hustle (disambiguation), which should be the correct title per sentence case. I don't think this as a redirect is necessary. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:52, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Keep per {{temp|R from move}} and {{temp|R from other capitalisation}}, especially as two entries of the dab page are capitalised. Thryduulf (talk) 18:58, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Keep per Thryduulf. What is also required is hatnotes that direct readers to the disambiguation page and I have now added these x3. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:42, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Strong keep per the above comments. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Keep per Thryduulf. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 22:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Keep as {{t|R from move}} and {{t|R from other capitalisation}} per above. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 02:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Bontes }} → :Louis Bontes  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bontes&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Bontes stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Bontes|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Bontes closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Bontes|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Bontes closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Bontes|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Bontes closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

The subject of the target article is not necessarily known by the mononym, and deletion would unable uninhibited Search to find Loius Bontes and the other unrelated mentions of this word. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:59, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Keep. I've just tagged this as {{tl|R from surname}}. "This is a redirect from a person's surname. It is used because Wikipedia has only one article about a person with this surname." He's the only Bontes we have. That tag puts the redirect into :Category:Surnames. Narky Blert (talk) 18:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Keep for the same reason as Chaffe. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• :Also {{-r|Euwe}}, {{-r|Morphy}}, {{-r|Nezhmetdinov}}, and any number of others. And that's just in chess. Narky Blert (talk) 19:58, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Keep per above, it's fairly common to use someone's surname as shorthand for the full name. Hut 8.5 18:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Keep as above. CrazyBoy826 00:04, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
• Keep per above, standard {{tl|R from surname}}. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 02:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
• keep per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 02:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
• Snow keep Meets {{tl|R from surname}}.—Bagumba (talk) 14:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Brain cell (disambiguation) }} → :Brain cell  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brain_cell_(disambiguation)&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Brain_cell_%28disambiguation%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Brain cell (disambiguation)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Brain cell (disambiguation) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Brain cell (disambiguation)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Brain cell (disambiguation) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Brain cell (disambiguation)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Brain cell (disambiguation) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Delete. The target page is no longer a disambiguation page (or a disambiguation-like page): "brain cell" is not ambiguous. {{re|Narky Blert}}'s WP:G14 tag was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=991671034&oldid=991654999&title=Brain_cell_(disambiguation) removed] by {{re|Iztwoz}}. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Delete. I cannot imagine why my G14 speedy was taken off; it looked utterly routine. {{tl|R from ambiguous}} ("a redirect from an ambiguous page name to a page or list that disambiguates it") is only appropriate for redirects to DAB pages, and is totally inappropriate for a redirect to a WP:PTOPIC. Narky Blert (talk) 17:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Comment I suspect that the speedy deletion was declined due to the extensive page history (a quick look suggests this has been an article at least twice). The {{temp|R from ambiguous}} is definitely incorrect though, it even explicitly says "this template should never appear on a page that has "(disambiguation)" in its title" (emphasis in original). Thryduulf (talk) 17:15, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• :Even if this page has history, a DAB page is not an article. The first sentence of MOS:DAB begins: "Disambiguation pages [...] are non-article pages". Narky Blert (talk) 18:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• ::Indeed, but the versions in the page history were articles not disambiguation pages, the page has been moved at least once since then. Thryduulf (talk) 22:42, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. Unsure why this was declined G14 deletion. Does not target a disambiguation page and the term is not ambiguous. I don't think the page history of a 1k article that was repeatedly vandalised by IP's and repeatedly reverted to a redirect is worth keeping. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 21:30, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Whether it is worth keeping or not it is something that that should be considered here rather than speedily deleted. Thryduulf (talk) 22:42, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = List of suburbans of Dhaka city }} → :List of districts and suburbs of Dhaka  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_suburbans_of_Dhaka_city&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=List_of_suburbans_of_Dhaka_city stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:List of suburbans of Dhaka city|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#List of suburbans of Dhaka city closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:List of suburbans of Dhaka city|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#List of suburbans of Dhaka city closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:List of suburbans of Dhaka city|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#List of suburbans of Dhaka city closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Originally tagged as R3 but rejected after move. Article created on 24 January 2021 with an implausable title. Article has no links to mainspace (which I can see). I believe this should be deleted.  // Timothy :: talk  12:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Delete now there are no incoming links. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:38, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. What's a suburban? if not a person. Narky Blert (talk) 18:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. "suburbans" is not an alternative name for a suburb as far as I'm aware, it appears that the page was created at a misspelling? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 19:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Tier 1b }} → :Scaled Composites  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tier_1b&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Tier_1b stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Tier 1b|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Tier 1b closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Tier 1b|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Tier 1b closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Tier 1b|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Tier 1b closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

"Tier 1b" is ambiguous and not mentioned at the target: delete. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Delete the only mention of "tier" in the article is for Scaled Composites Tier One and a Google search for "Ter 1b" in quotes returns many things for coronavirus and several other unrelated terms. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:50, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. Tier 1b can also mean a COVID-19 inoculation program [https://www.wave3.com/2021/01/18/first-week-tier-b-appointments-completely-booked-how-schedule-future-appointment/ 1] [https://eu.courier-journal.com/story/news/local/2021/01/14/coronavirus-vaccine-sign-up-available-louisville-tier-1-b/4156503001/ 2] [https://www.publichealthmdc.com/blog/covid-19-vaccine-who-gets-it-first-and-why 3] [http://www.cityofhubbard-oh.gov/covid-19-vaccine-distribution-for-tier-1b/ 4] - and right now, that's probably what a reader would be looking for. Narky Blert (talk) 18:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Note that Tier 1b was the location from April 2011 to August 2012 of the article merged at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scaled Composites Tier 1b. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:26, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Tier one university }} → :College and university rankings  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tier_one_university&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Tier_one_university stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Tier one university|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Tier one university closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Tier one university|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Tier one university closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Tier one university|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Tier one university closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

• {{no redirect|1 = Tier two university }} → :College and university rankings  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tier_two_university&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Tier_two_university stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Tier two university|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Tier two university closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Tier two university|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Tier two university closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Tier two university|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Tier two university closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

• {{no redirect|1 = Tier three university }} → :College and university rankings  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tier_three_university&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Tier_three_university stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Tier three university|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Tier three university closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Tier three university|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Tier three university closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Tier three university|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Tier three university closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

• {{no redirect|1 = Tier four university }} → :College and university rankings  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tier_four_university&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Tier_four_university stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Tier four university|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Tier four university closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Tier four university|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Tier four university closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Tier four university|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Tier four university closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

The target article does not mention "tier" and does not contain any direct information about tier classifications of universities. A reader searching for "Tier three university", for instance, will therefore find nothing helpful at this target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:18, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• There is some mention of tier 4 [https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/sss/tier-4/university here] for Sheffield AC and [https://www.herts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/252864/HR15A-Employment-of-Students-Tier-4.pdf here] for Hertfordshire but I'm not sure it belongs in the article and if it doesn't then it should be deleted. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Account suicide }} → :wiktionary:Appendix:Internet slang  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Account_suicide&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Account_suicide stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Account suicide|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Account suicide closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Account suicide|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Account suicide closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Account suicide|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Account suicide closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Wiktionary redirect without entry on Wiktionary. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 08:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails criteria at {{tl|Wiktionary redirect}}. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:41, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = 833r }} → :wiktionary:Appendix:Internet slang  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=833r&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=833r stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:833r|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#833r closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:833r|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#833r closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:833r|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#833r closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Wiktionary redirect without corresponding Wiktionary entry Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 08:30, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails criteria at {{tl|Wiktionary redirect}}. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = DTU (redirect) }} → :Technical University of Denmark  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=DTU_(redirect)&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=DTU_%28redirect%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:DTU (redirect)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#DTU (redirect) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:DTU (redirect)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#DTU (redirect) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:DTU (redirect)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#DTU (redirect) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Leftover from page moves; implausible and not more needed. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Delete I don't remember the initial problem, and I was rather new to Wikipedia when I did the move. Considering there's a disambiguation page for "DTU", this redirect isn't really necessary. WQUlrich (talk) 09:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Maine (redirect) }} → :COVID-19 pandemic in Maine  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_Maine_(redirect)&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_Maine_%28redirect%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:2020 coronavirus pandemic in Maine (redirect)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#2020 coronavirus pandemic in Maine (redirect) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:2020 coronavirus pandemic in Maine (redirect)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#2020 coronavirus pandemic in Maine (redirect) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:2020 coronavirus pandemic in Maine (redirect)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#2020 coronavirus pandemic in Maine (redirect) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Leftover from page moves; implausible and not more needed. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Why not speedy this? Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 08:31, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Maybe because of this. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:40, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delete note that this doesn't have any history and if it did it could be moved elsewhere. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• I created the (original) page. Just delete. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:44, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delete G6. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete G6/G7 Seems that when the redirect was turned into an article the redirect was moved to this title rather than being deleted or overwritten. I can't see any point in keeping this - it's not a plausible search term. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 18:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• {{tl|db-moved}}'d. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 23:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = 12 Years a Slave (film) (redirect) }} → :12 Years a Slave (film)  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=12_Years_a_Slave_(film)_(redirect)&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=12_Years_a_Slave_%28film%29_%28redirect%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:12 Years a Slave (film) (redirect)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#12 Years a Slave (film) (redirect) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:12 Years a Slave (film) (redirect)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#12 Years a Slave (film) (redirect) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:12 Years a Slave (film) (redirect)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#12 Years a Slave (film) (redirect) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Created for testing purposes; does not seem to be needed any more. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Delete as noted the test seems to be over. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:54, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delete. At first, I was like, what do I have to do with this? Now I see... whoops. I wouldn't do this sort of thing today. Yes, test is over, carry on. {{smiley}} Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 12:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Americas (redirect) }} → :Americas  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Americas_(redirect)&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Americas_%28redirect%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Americas (redirect)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Americas (redirect) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Americas (redirect)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Americas (redirect) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Americas (redirect)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Americas (redirect) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Created for testing purposes; does not seem to be needed any more. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:45, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Delete as noted the test seems to be over. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:24, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Notorious B.I.G. (redirect) }} → :The Notorious B.I.G.  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Notorious_B.I.G._(redirect)&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Notorious_B.I.G._%28redirect%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Notorious B.I.G. (redirect)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Notorious B.I.G. (redirect) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Notorious B.I.G. (redirect)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Notorious B.I.G. (redirect) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Notorious B.I.G. (redirect)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Notorious B.I.G. (redirect) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Created for testing purposes; does not seem to be needed any more. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:36, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Delete as noted the test seems to be over. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• {{ping|Seventyfiveyears|Tavix|Drbogdan}} Pinging the participators of this related discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:21, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delete - responding to a ping - don't recall ever being involved with this "redirect" - directly or indirectly - nonetheless - *entirely* ok with me to speedy delete afaik atm - iac - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 13:18, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delete this and above redirects with "(redirect)". This maybe is a test, but it is not useful and helpful at all. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 21:13, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{no redirect|1 = Battle of Despotovac }} → :Stefan Lazarević  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Despotovac&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2020-12-27&end=2021-01-25&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Battle_of_Despotovac stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Battle of Despotovac|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Battle of Despotovac closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Battle of Despotovac|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Battle of Despotovac closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Battle of Despotovac|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Battle of Despotovac closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

This redirect should be deleted. There is no documentation that there was ever a Battle of Despotovac. In the Stefan Lazarević article there is no mention of any such battle. So in effect readers are given the impression that a fictious battle occurred and are sent to an article where no mention is made.

A search of the Internet for "Battle of Despotovac" will only produce other Wikipedia articles linked in some manner to the term "Battle of Despotovac" or articles that have sourced Wikipedia. This article was created without sourcing by a non-existant user.

Thanks VFF0347 (talk) 03:06, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

• Delete unless a properly sourced entry is added to the target article. As stated by the nom there's no mention of this supposed battle at the target and the only mention of Despotovac is with regards to the monastery he built there. As it stands this redirect will simply confuse readers. The one line stub article that was at this redirect was apparently a copyvio from a myspace profile, which does not bode well for verifiability and reliability. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 10:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

:* The more I look into it the more I'm sure this is a hoax. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Battle_of_Despotovac&oldid=471579582 article] claimed that Bayezid I's son Musa was killed in this battle in 1406, but we know that he actually died in 1413 following the battle of Çamurlu (see the sources in Musa Çelebi). 86.23.109.101 (talk) 16:00, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

• Delete. I can't find a mention of any such battle in Serbian or Serbo-Croatian WP, and googling Битка код Деспотовца turned up nothing. Narky Blert (talk) 18:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.