Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 31#1617817745

{{rfd log header|2021|March 30|2021|April 1}}

=[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 31|March 31]]=

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 31, 2021.

==Aggregate concrete==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. No participation after two relists, which makes me think that the status quo is likely the preferred option. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:04, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Aggregate concrete }}:Construction aggregate  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aggregate_concrete&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-02-13&end=2021-03-14&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Aggregate_concrete stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Aggregate concrete|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Aggregate concrete closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Aggregate concrete|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Aggregate concrete closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Aggregate concrete|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Aggregate concrete closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Should this target Construction aggregate or Concrete (maybe the Concrete#Aggregates section)? This redirect has dual meanings, it could either be the aggregates used in the production of concrete, or it could be aggregates made from recycled concrete. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==1234567890==

File:Three disambiguation arrows icon in rounded blue square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was disambiguate due to no consensus

. While the discussion numerically leans towards Arabic numerals as the best target, it's very clear from the amount of time this discussion has continued, and the many suggestions there are, that there probably isn't an unambiguous primary topic. I've drafted a disambiguation page covering the three suggested targets and will retarget 123456789 and 0123456789 to it. This will, at least, solve the problems of (a) these very similar targets pointing to different reasonable places, and (b) some messy hatnotes. I obviously invite further improvements to the disambiguation page, and if further discussion is needed about this in future, it can at least start from a more cohesive point. ~ mazca talk 10:15, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = 1234567890 }}:Unix time#Notable events in Unix time  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1234567890&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-01-25&end=2021-02-23&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=1234567890 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:1234567890|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#1234567890 closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:1234567890|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#1234567890 closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:1234567890|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#1234567890 closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

While this is described at the target, I'm pretty sure thet Arabic numerals is the primary topic. A hatnote might be added there, but I don't think it's necessary. This redirect gets well over a hundred monthly pageviews and might be confusing for many people. Note that {{-r|0123456789}} also redirects to the proposed target. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: While there is already consensus for retargeting, there is still some slight disagreement with regards to the primary topic.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 06:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to pandigital number, the correct place if we talk about this as a number, instead of as a string of symbols, and clean up the hatnotes there. —Kusma (t·c) 09:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Numeral system. Paul 012 brings up some points that I mostly agree with. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 12:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Disambiguate There doesn't appear to be a clear primary topic to me, and there are three valid targets suggested above. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Arabic numerals. I think someone searching this is intending to type out the set of Arabic numerals (either out of boredom or curiosity) instead of meaning this to be the number 1,234,567,890. Of course, where ever this ends up, please add or clean-up the hatnotes to the other valid targets. -- Tavix (talk) 18:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Arabic numerals, in line with 0123456789, and point 123456789 there as well. It's a better target than Numeral system, which is much more broad. I mostly agree with Tavix, but really, it's hard to do more than guess what readers likely mean. Pandigital number is too specific to strike me as the primary topic. — The Earwig (talk) 08:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Depending on which retarget option is the most popular, we could end up with 0123456789, 123456789, and 1234567890 going to 2-3 different targets. There seems to be a consensus against deletion and for retargeting, but we can do with more opinions on where to take the redirect.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 09:28, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Disambiguate per 86 above. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: I've reverted an earlier close. Because of the variety of opinions and the relevance for other redirects, this discussion could do with more input.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Uanfala (talk) 23:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget to Arabic numerals. I think this because it points out the Arabic numerals and 0123456789 goes there as well. It is also a more specific one than Numeral system.Keresluna (talk) 18:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Disambiguate per 86 IP and Mdewman6, where the three valid targets can be added as to avoid any sort of confusion. CycloneYoris talk! 23:55, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Arabic numerals. Numeral system seems too broad, and Pandigital number seems like an unlikely intended target. signed, Rosguill talk 19:27, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Roman equivalent==

==Cylindricity==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to Roundness (object). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Cylindricity }}:Cylinder  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cylindricity&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-02-07&end=2021-03-08&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Cylindricity stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Cylindricity|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Cylindricity closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Cylindricity|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Cylindricity closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Cylindricity|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Cylindricity closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Cylindricity is a measure of how cylindrical an object is, but it isn't mentioned in the target article. The best target I found was Roundness (object), but it only mentions the term in the lead. There are also a load of articles on engineering tolerances that might be suitable targets, and an entry on wiktionary. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:08, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Nominator has proposed multiple possible suggestions without a clear indication of which they prefer.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:31, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Retarget; I think Roundness (object) is the best option since it at least mentions the term and gives the general context. Adumbrativus (talk) 03:43, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Cockmonger==

==Glizzy==

==A (internet meme)==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. plicit 03:55, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = A (internet meme) }}:Hololive Production  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_(internet_meme)&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-03-01&end=2021-03-30&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=A_%28internet_meme%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:A (internet meme)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#A (internet meme) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:A (internet meme)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#A (internet meme) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:A (internet meme)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#A (internet meme) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

No mention of memes at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 17:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Comment: One of Hololive's talents, Gawr Gura, has a catchphrase "a" that became a meme. I personally don't think it's a likely search target especially when the Hololive article does not mention the meme at all. _dk (talk) 18:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
  • :This is the sort of thing that makes me feel old, in that I cannot imagine how "A" is a catchphrase, and don't really want to find out. If there's no content related to the meme on-wiki, then the redirect isn't doing the thing that redirects are for and should be deleted. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:10, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable meme. Dominicmgm (talk) 21:59, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Current Fractions==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hog Farm Talk 17:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Current Fractions }}:Splits and mergers Of Kerala Congress  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Current_Fractions&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-03-01&end=2021-03-30&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Current_Fractions stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Current Fractions|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Current Fractions closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Current Fractions|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Current Fractions closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Current Fractions|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Current Fractions closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

While this is the title of a section at the target, it's a generic phrase that does not necessarily refer to Kerala Congress. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete as hopelessly ambiguous. There are probably literally a thousand or more things this could refer to. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:11, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete as ambiguous, per above. I'm 90% sure this (and the title of the section it points to) is also a typo and is supposed to be "Current Factions", rather than "Current Fractions", as the article is about various political factions in the Kerala Congress. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 20:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
  • :I had the same thought. One more reason to just delete it. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete Ambiguous and misleading. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 11:03, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Arnold Hall (Hartwick College)==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hog Farm Talk 17:49, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Arnold Hall (Hartwick College) }}:Hartwick College  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arnold_Hall_(Hartwick_College)&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-03-01&end=2021-03-30&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Arnold_Hall_%28Hartwick_College%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Arnold Hall (Hartwick College)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Arnold Hall (Hartwick College) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Arnold Hall (Hartwick College)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Arnold Hall (Hartwick College) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Arnold Hall (Hartwick College)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Arnold Hall (Hartwick College) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 16:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Fine Arts Theatre==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hog Farm Talk 17:48, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Fine Arts Theatre }}:Stony Brook Southampton  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fine_Arts_Theatre&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-03-01&end=2021-03-30&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Fine_Arts_Theatre stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Fine Arts Theatre|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Fine Arts Theatre closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Fine Arts Theatre|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Fine Arts Theatre closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Fine Arts Theatre|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Fine Arts Theatre closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Not mentioned at the target, could conceivably refer to many different theatres. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 16:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete as ambiguous and likely to cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Paolino Recreation Center==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hog Farm Talk 17:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Paolino Recreation Center }}:Roger Williams University  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Paolino_Recreation_Center&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-03-01&end=2021-03-30&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Paolino_Recreation_Center stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Paolino Recreation Center|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Paolino Recreation Center closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Paolino Recreation Center|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Paolino Recreation Center closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Paolino Recreation Center|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Paolino Recreation Center closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Not mentioned at the target or anywhere else on Wikipedia, delete unless a duly sourced mention can be added. signed, Rosguill talk 16:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==OpenStore==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hog Farm Talk 17:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = OpenStore }}:Ubuntu Touch  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=OpenStore&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-03-01&end=2021-03-30&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=OpenStore stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:OpenStore|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#OpenStore closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:OpenStore|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#OpenStore closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:OpenStore|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#OpenStore closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 16:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Kinnies==

==Free Willie (Due South)==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to List of Due South episodes#ep2. Hog Farm Talk 17:46, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Free Willie (Due South) }}:Free Willy  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Free_Willie_(Due_South)&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-03-01&end=2021-03-30&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Free_Willie_%28Due_South%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Free Willie (Due South)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Free Willie (Due South) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Free Willie (Due South)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Free Willie (Due South) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Free Willie (Due South)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Free Willie (Due South) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Not mentioned in the target article. I dunno what the disambiguator is supposed to mean. Is it a song? Dominicmgm (talk) 14:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Fee willy==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hog Farm Talk 15:26, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Fee willy }}:Free Willy  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fee_willy&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-03-01&end=2021-03-30&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Fee_willy stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Fee willy|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Fee willy closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Fee willy|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Fee willy closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Fee willy|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Fee willy closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Implausible typo. I doubt anyone would miss the "R" from "free". Dominicmgm (talk) 14:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Bum bum be-dum==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hog Farm Talk 15:26, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Bum bum be-dum }}:Disturbia (song)  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bum_bum_be-dum&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-03-01&end=2021-03-30&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Bum_bum_be-dum stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Bum bum be-dum|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Bum bum be-dum closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Bum bum be-dum|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Bum bum be-dum closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Bum bum be-dum|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Bum bum be-dum closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

I propose this redirect be deleted per #5 and #8 of WP:R#DELETE and WP:NOTLYRICS as with Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 28#Work work work work work. Pamzeis (talk) 13:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

  • I think I agree that it should be deleted,but not for the first two reasons in the nomination. LYRICS refers to content of articles, not redirects, and the other link is just a list of reasons one might delete a redirect, with no indication given which reason is germane in this case. It's generally helpful to be specific in a nomination about why a policy applies as opposed to just throwing out some shortcuts and assuming that makes a clear argument. All that being said, this is not a useful redirect, unless it was to go to a WP:DAB page (that at this time does not exist) similar to la la la. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. While redirects from lyrics can be helpful (especially if the title of the song is not in the lyrics), this is too ambiguous to redirect to a certain song. Dominicmgm (talk) 13:51, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Stephen French (troll)==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hog Farm Talk 15:25, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Stephen French (troll) }}:Lorraine Higgins#2015 threats and harassment  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_French_(troll)&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-03-01&end=2021-03-30&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Stephen_French_%28troll%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Stephen French (troll)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Stephen French (troll) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Stephen French (troll)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Stephen French (troll) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Stephen French (troll)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Stephen French (troll) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Mr. French is a non-notable living person who was convicted of threatening and harassing Lorraine Higgins. "Troll" as a parenthetical disambiguator seems like a BLP violation to me (though some newspapers have described him as an internet troll). I suggest deleting this and replacing it with something like :Stephen French (criminal). Cheers, gnu57 13:07, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete If he's not notable on his own I don't see good reason to have any sort of redirect at all.Beeblebrox (talk) 21:51, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==(East Lancs) British Citybus==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hog Farm Talk 15:25, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = (East Lancs) British Citybus }}:East Lancashire Coachbuilders  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=(East_Lancs)_British_Citybus&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-03-01&end=2021-03-30&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=%28East_Lancs%29_British_Citybus stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:(East Lancs) British Citybus|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#(East Lancs) British Citybus closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:(East Lancs) British Citybus|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#(East Lancs) British Citybus closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:(East Lancs) British Citybus|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#(East Lancs) British Citybus closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Implausible search term Nightfury 09:53, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete; unusual format makes it somewhat confusing and unlikely to be useful. Adumbrativus (talk) 03:32, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Geodreieck==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hog Farm Talk 15:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Geodreieck }}:Set square#Geodreieck  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Geodreieck&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-03-01&end=2021-03-30&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Geodreieck stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Geodreieck|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Geodreieck closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Geodreieck|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Geodreieck closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Geodreieck|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Geodreieck closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

This is the name of a set square produced by a German company. The target of the redirect was a section of Set square that was removed as blatant advertising [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Set_square&diff=next&oldid=997403328]. So, the only occurrence of "Geodreieck" in En WP is this redirect, which must be deleted either. D.Lazard (talk) 08:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete. Basically per nom. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:30, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Incompetent valves==

==Put to the sword==

==Podarke (polychaete)==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to Oxydromus. signed, Rosguill talk 20:03, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Podarke (polychaete) }}:Polychaete  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Podarke_(polychaete)&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-02-22&end=2021-03-23&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Podarke_%28polychaete%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Podarke (polychaete)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Podarke (polychaete) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Podarke (polychaete)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Podarke (polychaete) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Podarke (polychaete)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Podarke (polychaete) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

redundant and misleading. Redirecting wrongly. Correct Podarke (genus) Estopedist1 (talk) 06:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

  • {{ping|Estopedist1}} obviously, you're right, and I think you would have been justified changing it without starting a discussion first 😊—Neil Shah-Quinn (talk) 07:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
  • : {{ping|Neil Shah-Quinn}} sorry, I wasn't clear enough. Podarke (polychaete) should be deleted. No point to keep it--Estopedist1 (talk) 07:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
  • :: {{ping|Estopedist1}} oh, I see. That sounds reasonable to me.—Neil Shah-Quinn (talk) 12:34, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Oxydromus, correct and harmless. J947messageedits 20:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

  • I find it unlikely as a search term, but agree that it could be retargeted per the above comment, as the target article mentions the name. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:30, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Retarget per J947. Old name for that, see also [http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=129318 World Register of Marine Life]. Hog Farm Talk 15:24, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Sub Zero (roller coaster)==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was speedy delete.

apparent hoax. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:27, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Sub Zero (roller coaster) }}:Six Flags Great Adventure  (talk · links · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sub_Zero_(roller_coaster)&action=history history] · [https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews?start=2021-03-01&end=2021-03-30&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Sub_Zero_%28roller_coaster%29 stats])     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Sub Zero (roller coaster)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Sub Zero (roller coaster) closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Sub Zero (roller coaster)|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Sub Zero (roller coaster) closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Sub Zero (roller coaster)|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Sub Zero (roller coaster) closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

This was a fabricated claim by an editor who was later blocked. There was never a roller coaster announced or installed by this name at a Six Flags theme park. GoneIn60 (talk) 07:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete as a hoax. Dominicmgm (talk) 00:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

==Eductor-jet pump==