Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 8#1650788123

• {{Rfd2/-r|1=Hittite Empir}} → :Hittites  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Hittite Empir|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Hittite Empir closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Hittite Empir|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Hittite Empir closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Hittite Empir|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Hittite Empir closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Should be deleted as a typo, unlikely to be searched on. There exists a redirect at "Hittite Empire" to direct searchers. _signed, Willondon (talk) 00:05, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete. We shouldn't be creating redirects for misspellings of the generic constituent of a phrase (because, among other reasons, these can often obstruct unrelated searches). I'd also support the deletion of {{-r|Roman Empir}}, the only other redirect with this typo. – Uanfala (talk) 00:09, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
• :The nom created WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 11#Roman Empir two days later. Jay (talk) 14:30, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
• The person who created the redirect fixed Special:Diff/255153716 5 minutes later back in 2009 (Special:Diff/282511130). This was probably unnecessary from the start. Uncle G (talk) 16:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{Rfd2/-r|1=Traditional Sunni–Salafi relations}} → :Sufi–Salafi relations  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Traditional Sunni–Salafi relations|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Traditional Sunni–Salafi relations closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Traditional Sunni–Salafi relations|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Traditional Sunni–Salafi relations closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Traditional Sunni–Salafi relations|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Traditional Sunni–Salafi relations closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Well this is torturous. Despite this redirect making absolutely no sense, apparently speedy deletion is off the cards. (I thought misnomer was the perfect description, but anywho!) For everyone with two eyes in their head, Sunni-Salafi is not the same thing as Sufi-Salafi. Sunnism and Sufism are completely different things, and the confusion that led to this redirect being created is beyond me. "Traditional Sunni" is meanwhile a neologism plucked out of thin air. This redirect is pure error/incorrect nonsense/however you'd like to phrase it. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete. That's confusing chalk with cheese. – Uanfala (talk) 00:19, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Purely error and incorrect redirect Zsohl^(Talk) 17:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete: misleading, per nom. Veverve (talk) 12:37, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete: per WP:RDEL and WP:RNEUTRAL; since the title is confusing, and a misnomer.shadowwarrior8 (talk) 6:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{Rfd2/-r|1=Nodal tissue}} → :Cardiac pacemaker  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Nodal tissue|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Nodal tissue closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Nodal tissue|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Nodal tissue closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Nodal tissue|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Nodal tissue closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Google Scholar results suggest that "nodal tissue" comes up in a variety of medical contexts, not exclusively related to cardiac pacemakers. As the phrase is briefly mentioned but not discussed in depth at various Wikipedia articles, deletion to allow for search results seems appropriate. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{Rfd2/-r|1=Leto atreides ii}} → :Leto II Atreides  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Leto atreides ii|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Leto atreides ii closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Leto atreides ii|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Leto atreides ii closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Leto atreides ii|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Leto atreides ii closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Propose deletion. Redirect has no obvious benefit, only drawbacks. There's already the redirect Leto Atreides II so a search for "Leto atreides ii" could be handled by the properly capitalized redirect. Keeping this however has downsides, one is that Cirrus search shows "Leto atreides ii" with higher priority than "Leto Atreides II" so users are presented with an incorrect capitalization while typing. Secondly, without a raison d'être, this just clutters up the rcats. Jason Quinn (talk) 14:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom.— TAnthony^Talk 02:13, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{Rfd2/-r|1=War in Iraq}} → :Iraq War  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:War in Iraq|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#War in Iraq closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:War in Iraq|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#War in Iraq closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:War in Iraq|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#War in Iraq closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Retarget to List of wars involving Iraq. This title is not specific to any war. Balkovec (talk) 12:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

• Retarget per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 03:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
• Retarget per nom. A7V2 (talk) 06:11, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{Rfd2/-r|1=Homestar Runner Wiki}} → :Homestar Runner  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Homestar Runner Wiki|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Homestar Runner Wiki closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Homestar Runner Wiki|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Homestar Runner Wiki closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Homestar Runner Wiki|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Homestar Runner Wiki closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Not mentioned at target apart from a reference and an external link; someone searching for a fandom wiki will not be helped by the article about its topic. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 08:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, seems to be an external wiki so doesn't make sense to have a redirect within Wikipedia. Bonoahx (talk) 21:50, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
• This came up at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_January_10#Hrwiki}}, coincidentally mentioned in the April Fools section below. Part of the reason that was retargeted is that there's no relevant content at the target, so I agree that there should not be a redirect from this title. However, there was encyclopedic content at this title until Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homestar Runner Wiki (2) in July 2006, which resolved to merge it to the current target. The merged content seems to have then been removed in February 2009. That means three years' worth of revisions that would no longer meet the license requirements of CC-BY-SA ({{tq|You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor}}) and would thus be copyright violations. So either this should be moved without redirect to something like Talk:Homestar Runner/attribution/Homestar Runner Wiki with a relevant note added to the talkpage and/or article history, or deleted, with the 98 names at [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Homestar_Runner_Wiki#top-editors] added into the article's history by dummy edit (if desired, discounting bots and those whose only contributions were below the threshold of originality). -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 23:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete: the wiki is [http://www.hrwiki.org/wiki/Main_Page this] and is not mentioned at the target. Admins can do what must be done to make it so that the the content which was added stays compliant with WP's copyleft, if need be. Veverve (talk) 12:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{Rfd2/-r|1=Trick Williams}} → :List of WWE personnel#NXT 2.0  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Trick Williams|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Trick Williams closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Trick Williams|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Trick Williams closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Trick Williams|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Trick Williams closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

deletion. The article has no information about the subject besides he works in WWE. If he is released, the redirect will become useless. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

• {{Rfd2/-r|1=Magical Britain}} → :Harry Potter  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: {{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|(@subpage)|[{{fullurl:Magical Britain|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Magical Britain closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Magical Britain|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Magical Britain closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Magical Britain|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:{{FULLPAGENAME}}#Magical Britain closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete]}} ] 

Not mentioned in target article, and doesn't seem to be the correct name for the subject of the redirect either. Most third party sources which refer to this subject name it "Wizarding Britain". In addition, third party search engines looking up the term "Magical Britain" seem to instead return results regarding fictional maps of Britain where locations and creature from folklore, such as the Loch Ness Monster, can be located. Steel1943 (talk) 19:19, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

• Nominator comment/update: Seems as though the redirect has a connection to Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality; the subject is fanfiction though, so I don't believe it would be helpful to retarget the nominated redirect to any article that is canon, but I'm also not sure if it's worth not deleting the redirect per my original nomination rationale. Steel1943 (talk) 19:29, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
• Creator comment: delete. I would have thought it was called that in the original books - apparently I did - but yeah, the fanfic isn't a worthwhile redirect - David Gerard (talk) 21:16, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Creator is fine with deletion as well. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Creator is fine with deletion, but nominator is unsure about deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 05:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Ping|Jay}} Based on the discussion thus far, I'm okay with deletion. Steel1943 (talk) 15:32, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
• It's used here and there in commentaries on Harry Potter works, usually with "magical" in lowercase, but Steel1943 is right that it's also used for stuff that isn't related to Harry Potter at all, and that isn't really an encyclopaedic name for anything. Uncle G (talk) 16:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.