Login
Login

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 3#1725939503

{{rfd log header|2024|September 2|2024|September 4}}

=[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 3|September 3]]=

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 3, 2024.

==Syracuse, Free municipal consortium of Syracuse==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Created by a blocked user. "Free municipal consortium" phrase is not mentioned in the article. Implausible redirect. Delete. -1ctinus📝🗨 18:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete. While the province of Syracuse has been the "free municipal consortium of Syracuse" since 2015, this does not seem like a useful redirect for navigation purposes. ----Kinu t/c 23:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete - Implausible search term. At 9 years old, it's a good idea to check for usage to see if we're catching any external links this way, but in those 9 years, the stats page says it's gotten ZERO hits per year. Not one or two, zero (until it went up here). That just confirms the implausibility of it, and also confirms there aren't any external links we need to worry about. Fieari (talk) 01:52, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete. Free municipal consortium of Syracuse and Syracuse, Free municipal consortium of are plausible search terms (the correctly capitalised variants even more so), but the combination is not. Thryduulf (talk) 01:55, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 06:21, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete, extremely unlikely anyone will search for or include this specific phrase in an article. Constantine ✍ 10:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Italian Second spring offensive==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Inconsistent capitalization; I'd think capitalizing "second" but not "spring offensive" is not very plausible. Complex/Rational 17:49, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete I agree this is implausible, particularly given that the stats show zero usage in the past four years. Fieari (talk) 01:54, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 00:14, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Doctor Who fortieth series==

File:White check mark in dark green rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was keep

. (non-admin closure) Cremastra (talk) 20:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Seems to be an incorrect ordinal (40th instead of 14th). Not sure if there's a 40th season this could point to, so delete unless there's a clear and obvious retarget. Complex/Rational 17:45, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:Series 14 was the 40th series of doctor who, and some people in the discussion on the talk page claimed they could not fing the page for lack of a redirect, so I added it Cal3000000 (talk) 17:58, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Keep per Cal, above. Fieari (talk) 01:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Keep per Cal3000000 --Lenticel (talk) 01:20, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Tobacco Tax Act==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 10%23Tobacco Tax Act

==List of cities in Clipperton Island==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12%23List of cities in Clipperton Island

==Poffin==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 10%23Poffin

==Elemental Stone==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

vague as fr*ck, and not even a commonly used term cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete as ambiguous. This is not just a pokemon thing, elemental stones are used all across vast swathes of fantasy works, including (but by far not limited to) the Witcher, D&D, the Fifth Element, not to mention IRL new age mysticism... no primary target, and the term isn't really notable by itself to get a disambiguation page. So delete. Fieari (talk) 01:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete as vague --Lenticel (talk) 00:09, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==LHS 2065==

File:White i in purple rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was Procedural close

. Target is now an article, and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_September_3&oldid=1244873823#LHS_2065 withdrawn] by nominator. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

LHS 2065 is not a brown dwarf. [https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....121.2758M/abstract This paper] states: {{tq|Given the typical age of a disk Magazzu` star (a few gigayears), LHS 2065 would be a very low mass star rather than a massive brown dwarf.}} I suggest retargrting to List of stars in Hydra as a better result. If this star is not in the list, an entry can be created. Actually, we can create an article about this star.}} 21 Andromedae (talk) 15:01, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

:So turn it into an article, that doesn't require an RfD. It does appear notable. SevenSpheres (talk) 15:57, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: An entry has not been created in List of stars in Hydra. Notified of this discussion at the talk pages of the creator, and the current and proposed targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 17:13, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Blaze (Pokémon)==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

unmentioned and unimportant cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:10, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. --Un assiolo (talk) 13:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete as not notable outside the franchise. I'm not sure if this ability is that notable inside the games. --Lenticel (talk) 00:11, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
  • :it's literally only notable as a reason to dump a torchic and try to get a new one with speed boost cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 15:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Awakening Stone==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:21, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

refers to the dawn stone, which is unmentioned. not aware of any other awakening stones cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:06, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete as ambiguous. My first thought when seeing this was "Awakening stone sounds extremely generic, it must be used in all kinds of fantasy works." And a quick google search confirmed... octopath traveler, "He who fights with monsters", Dawn of Gods, World of Warcraft, LINE Rangers, new age crystal mysticism, Guardian Tales... and that's just the FIRST page of google. The list goes on, and on, and on. This is not a particularly notable term in any of these works, but it is extensively used. There's no good target, and it's not notable enough for an article itself or a disambiguation page, so delete it. Fieari (talk) 01:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete per Fieari's findings --Lenticel (talk) 00:12, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Geometrical Dominator==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:23, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Geometrical Dominator is a level in the game Geometry Dash. However, none of the other game levels seem to have redirects and almost none of them are mentioned at the target. Should this redirect therefore be deleted? InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 16:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete. Implausible search term. --Un assiolo (talk) 13:57, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • :I wouldn't say it's implausible BombCraft8 (talk) (contributions) 12:45, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete as too obscure and in-universe. --Lenticel (talk) 00:50, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

:Delete because it is not mentioned in the redirect target. BombCraft8 (talk) (contributions) 12:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==International Wrestling Hall of Fame==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 10%23International Wrestling Hall of Fame

==✶✶✶✶==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to Four star. (non-admin closure) feminist🩸 (talk) 15:48, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

While the flag does feature these stars, I'm not sure whether it's obviously related to the flag or whether some might relate it to star ratings. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Retarget to the dab at Four star to match ****. Thryduulf (talk) 13:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Weak keep The four six-pointed stars, specifically, seem to be more unique to Chicago's flag (compared to regular asterisks ****). I wondered if a mention on the dab Four star might be possible (in which case retarget would have been an option), but, as that dab isn't specific to four six-pointed stars, that would require mentioning all flags with four stars, which isn't practical for a disambiguation (or a list of them, which doesn't seem to exist). Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
  • :The issue is whether this is a plausible search term for those looking for information about the flag of Chicago and no other topic, and it doesn't seem to be. Looking at google results for this as an exact phrase, none of the hits relate to the flag. two hits on page 3 are for the Chicago Brewhouse but the uses don't seem to relate to the flag but the star rating or decoration/emphasis/sparkle text that characterise almost all of the other uses. One hit at the bottom of page 4 is a facebook post entitled "We did it, #Chicago! ✶✶✶✶ Our city is... - Chef Rick Bayless" but I can't load the post so can't tell if the stars relate to the flag or are just decoration. The next result related to Chicago is a facebook video with the title "We did it, #Chicago! Our city is fully reopen, our staff is ..." that is almost certainly the same as the previous one - and this is in the middle of page 9. Between the two Chicago posts were two related to Maryland, two from Louisiana and one for a municipal library in Mendon, New York - all using the stars for emphasis or decoration; and many different star ratings (slightly more commonly for holiday accommodation in Austria than anything else). If this is kept though, a hatnote to the dab should be added. Thryduulf (talk) 01:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Keep - Using the special unicode character for this particular kind of star does limit the ambiguity considerably. Unless someone can point out another thing that four of this specific kind of star should point to, I say keep it. Fieari (talk) 01:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • :@Fieari see my long comment above. The most common use of four six-pointed stars is star ratings, followed by text decoration. I can find no evidence it is commonly used in reference to the flag. Thryduulf (talk) 10:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete. Implausible search term. No one is going to enter this obscure Unicode character into the search box. --Un assiolo (talk) 13:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • :The stats show that people do use this redirect. Whether that's by inputting it into the internal search engine or by one of the many other ways people can use to find article content is neither knowable nor relevant. Thryduulf (talk) 20:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • :I do think delete is the least desirable option here for what it's worth. Hey man im josh (talk) 21:43, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

:Delete who is even going to type this? It's had two views per month in the past months following creation. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

::I don't think many people will type this, but that's not really an issue as they can copy/paste, follow links, etc. Thryduulf (talk) 10:33, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

  • No preference between retain or delete. If it remains extant, it should be retargeted to Four star (the article on the flag can be listed there in some way if desired). — Godsy (TALKCONT) 14:49, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Four star (disambiguation) per Thryduulf. Enix150 (talk) 20:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
  • REtarget to the disambiguation page -- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 04:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Four star. C F A 💬 13:53, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==J Tuck==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to Tuck (surname). (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 13:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = J Tuck }} → :Justin Tucker  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:J Tuck|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#J Tuck closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:J Tuck|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#J Tuck closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:J Tuck|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#J Tuck closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

As far as I'm aware, and based on some searching, Justin Tucker is not known as "J Tuck". One source for this is [https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/T/TuckJu00.htm Pro Football Reference], which would typically list player nicknames, even obscure ones that some might argue against including. [https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BradTo00.htm Tom Brady] is a good example of this, where it shows a number of nicknames in brackets beside his full name. There's also a number of people on Tuck (surname) that would likely serve as better targets, such as Jay Tuck. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:46, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Retarget to Tuck (surname). The most common hit is for a "media personality" based in Kansas City about whom we don't seem to have any content (I have not investigated whether they are notable), but it's a plausible search term for multiple people listed at the surname page. Thryduulf (talk) 13:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Justin Tuck or Tuck (surname). When you look up "J Tuck" on google/internet, it usually comes up with Justin Tuck. However, Tuck (surname) would also be plausible as it would possibly match 8 people with their first initial and their surname. WhyIsThisSoHard575483838 (talk) 13:45, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. None of these retargets sound plausible to me. -1ctinus📝🗨 18:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

::What seems implausible about redirecting "J Tuck" to a list of people called "J Tuck"? Thryduulf (talk) 21:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==List of pokemon items==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. ✗plicit 13:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

lists not present in the target, or anywhere here. list of pokémon items has already been deleted cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==PokéFlute==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to Snorlax. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 13:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

used to wake snorlax-shaped things up (such as snorlax); otherwise only mentioned twice in snorlax's article, but likely not in enough depth to warrant a redirect. opinions on retargeting there? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:I'd support retargetting to Snorlax. The sleepy way-blocking nature of Snorlax is pretty iconic. Ca talk to me! 14:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Retarget to Snorlax. The question I always ask when it comes to whether a redirect is worth it is, would following the redirect provide the searcher information about the subject they are searching for? And here, the answer is yes. It's not much information, but there really isn't much to say about it either, and this will provide all we have. Fieari (talk) 05:37, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Retarget to Snorlax per Fieari. --Lenticel (talk) 06:50, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Pokémaniac==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. ✗plicit 13:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

unmentioned trainer class (give or take a mention of a guy who likes blue things in master jouneys) cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. --Un assiolo (talk) 14:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete non notable trainer class. --Lenticel (talk) 00:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Potion (Pokémon)==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. ✗plicit 13:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

unmentioned cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:20, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. --Un assiolo (talk) 14:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete not notable even in universe --Lenticel (talk) 06:50, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Pokémon features==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. ✗plicit 13:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

vague. could refer to gameplay, as it currently does, but also to literally any other trait of pokémon games or species, or things the franchise has done collabs with cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete. Features of Pokémon, the games? Features of Pokémon, the television series? Features of the fictional Pokémon in the Pokémon games and television series? Yeah, no idea what this is meant to refer to. Steel1943 (talk) 17:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete as vague --Lenticel (talk) 06:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Pokémon techniques==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. ✗plicit 13:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

vague. subject to differing definitions of both words, and probably unlikely to refer specifically to moves cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:10, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Keep - Not vague, actually synonymous in this case. Google confirms the usage. Fieari (talk) 04:14, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • :to refer to moves each pokémon can have? because results gave me that, but also strategies each pokémon or team can run (trick room my beloved), strategies for the games as a whole, secret techniques in lgpe, "hacks", and ai slop cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:58, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete It's just too vague, at least in English, which is what this encyclopedia is. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:01, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete per Zxcvbnm. Steel1943 (talk) 17:57, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete as vague. --Lenticel (talk) 01:31, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Riot Diet==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 10%23Riot Diet

==Duck technique==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget Duck technique to Rubber duck debugging and Atwood's Duck to Battle Chess

. Jay 💬 22:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Not mentioned at target. I suppose the first one could refer to Rubber duck debugging? 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

  • Comment - A reference to part of the content removed in this edit. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 03:25, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Retarget Atwood's duck to Battle Chess#Development and merge some of the former content there. Unfortunately, sourcing appears to be such that it is only seemingly appropriate to cover it there (maybe leave a link in the see also section) for the time being. The other term is likely vague and will remain unmentioned, but neutral in its regard. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 03:39, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Support Retarget Atwood's duck to Battle Chess#Development and merge some of the former content there. The law of triviality page used to have details of Atwood's duck but has since been improved to death and all the interesting details have been removed because reasons. @Godsy 's retarget would cure this. Regards, Anameofmyveryown (talk) 11:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: While participants have agreed on retargeting the second redirect, there's still no agreement on what to do with the first.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Libopenraw==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. ✗plicit 11:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Not mentioned anywhere on the English Wikipedia. Does not seem to be related to LibRaw or OpenRAW. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Any thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:13, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete this is a project that might be notable at some point in the future but doesn't immediately seem so at the moment. Regardless it isn't mentioned anywhere currently so the redirect is misleading. Thryduulf (talk) 11:14, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete. If Thryduulf supports deleting a redirect, then it definitely needs to be deleted. --Un assiolo (talk) 14:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 02:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Opinion polling for the next Turkish parliamentary election==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to Next Turkish parliamentary election#Opinion polls. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 13:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Nonsense to have a redirect that constantly changes targets as per WP:ROUTINE. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 21:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

:Note {{-r|Next election in Denmark}}, which as previously been discussed in an RfD. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:09, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Retarget per Thryduulf, and remove the hatnote there. Jay 💬 12:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Life as we do not know it==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to Life as we don't know it. Articles linked from DABs don't need to mention the exact string, with or without capitalisation. What matters is that they address the idea that is ambiguous, and in this case, they do, so it's a good DAB page – one that helps readers navigate. What matters is the ideas, not the words. With that out of the way, WP:DIFFCAPS points us to the DAB page, and since the book and its author are listed there, it makes a good compromise, and is the option that is most helpful for the reader. Although number-wise this discussion was fairly split (4–2 retarget–keep including the nominator), but consensus and decisions are based on policy, and quality, not quantity of votes, I see a rough consensus to retarget to the DAB. I hope this closing statement adequately explains my rationale. (non-admin closure) Cremastra (talk) 20:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Suggest this be retargeted for now to the new dab page at Life as we don't know it. The correct uppercase version for this use, Life as We Do Not Know It, doesn't exist, nor do redirects exist for any of the other works mentioned at the current target. See also previous Rfd at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_September_27#Life_as_We_don't_Know_It. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

  • Support I added the book to the new target into "See also" --Altenmann >talk 01:38, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Keep as it is: None of the articles in the DAB actually make reference to the term "Life as we do not know it" (with or without contraction, with any capitalization). The article of Peter Ward at least mentions the book "Life as We Do Not Know It: The NASA Search for (and Synthesis of) Alien Life" (and redirecting "Book title" to "Book title: the subtitle" is fine) Cambalachero (talk) 03:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Retarget or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:Keep per Cambalachero, and I'm honestly doubtful of that disambiguation page being actually a good idea to begin with. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:02, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Support DAB - Sorry, I know this brings things back towards no-consensus, but just because an article does not contain the words "Life as we do not know it" does not mean that someone wouldn't search for the phrase intending to find something like alien life. Redirects and disambiguation pages are tools to help people find what they are looking for, and we can apply some common sense without needing all the weight of, say, the notability criteria at AfD. The book from the existing redirect is included at the proposed DAB, so someone looking for it will still find it this way. Fieari (talk) 07:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • DAB It's the wrong case for the redirect, so instead it should point to the dabby page that uses the same phrase with a contraction; the author can be added to the dablist as related from the work he wrote -- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 03:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Palestine and Israel==

File:Three disambiguation arrows icon in rounded blue square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was disambiguate

per WP:NCRET. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 13:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Another WP:XY on the same topic. At the very least, these should both likely point to the same place if they are kept. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 07:01, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

::I strongly oppose that per WP:NOTNEWS (as well as WP:DECAY) and due to the existence of other targets such as Israel–Palestine relations. Ambiguity is not a problem to be easily overlooked, unless a strong primary topic can be demonstrated (and the ambiguity is handled in other ways). If this remains extant, a more generalized target or a disambiguation page should hopefully prevail as an optimal solution. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 07:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:::WP:NOTNEWS? The conflict in question has been ongoing for decades, nigh-centuries per the article itself... we're not exactly dealing with WP:RECENTISM here! Fieari (talk) 07:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

::::NOTNEWS in the sense that if they were not currently at war a similar argument might be made to point this at, for example, Israeli–Palestinian peace process. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 07:45, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:::::Wow, you're... optimistic... about this. Somehow, I don't see this conflict ending in the next hundred years. Saying "were they not currently at war" sounds very much like saying "were the sun not to rise tomorrow". Fieari (talk) 23:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

::::::It also ignores that they are currently at war, and what we're interested in is what people are looking for now, not what they might be looking for if we lived in a different timeline or what they might be looking for at some point in the future. Even if a full and final ceasefire were declared tomorrow (I'm more optimistic than Fieari, but not that optimistic) the conflict would very likely still be high up the desired targets for some time to come. Thryduulf (talk) 01:49, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

:::::::Even if a full and final ceasefire were declared tomorrow, that wouldn't be the end of the conflict in general as discussed in the article. The conflict pretty much goes on even if the shooting stops. Fieari (talk) 02:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Political attack==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 10%23Political attack

==H:t==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. ✗plicit 05:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = H:t }} → :Help:Template  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:H:t|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#H:t closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:H:t|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#H:t closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:H:t|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#H:t closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

Pseudo-namespace redirect created 11 days ago of a type which new iterations are highly discouraged in many cases. Also, poorly formatted; {{no redirect|H:T}} already exists. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 04:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:comment : the reason i made this redirect was as to allow for typing the h:t shortcut in all lowercase

:? didn't know these were discouraged- would you mind elaborating ?

:​akizet talk 06:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

::{{reply to|Akizet}} See, primarily, WP:CNR; {{tq|Currently, the general consensus seems to be that most newly created cross-namespace redirects from the main namespace to the project namespace should be deleted, while very old ones [should likely be retained for various reasons (including the potential existence of external links)]}}. Secondly, see WP:SHORT; it is very rare for a shortcut to be uncapitalized. Lastly, and I genuinely mean this in a lighthearted and jovial way (the copyeditor portion of my mind won the argument of whether or not to say this), shift key might be a good read {{smiley2}}. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 06:39, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:::i see · then i support removing the redirect

:::re shift key : i mostly type in all lowercase ( see orthography usersubpage ( hence i thought it'd be weird to have a random uppercase letter in the wikitext · typing it as ` help:template ` works too though so i guess moot point

:::​akizet talk 16:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:::Are you sure caps lock might not be a better read? mwwv converse∫edits 13:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

:Delete, we shouldn't create redirects for a user just so they can continue to use some weird typing quirk. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 00:58, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Enix150 (talk) 20:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Palestine Israel==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 10%23Palestine Israel

==Semi-palindrome==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12%23Semi-palindrome

==Twofold rotational symmetry==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to Rotational symmetry. (non-admin closure) Cremastra (talk) 20:35, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

The target does not even mention rotational symmetry. Just retargeting to Rotational symmetry would be my suggestion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:33, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Retarget to Rotational symmetry, where this term is explicitly defined and discussed. Palindromes do not really fit the definition, except in a very abstract way. Fieari (talk) 07:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Comment This page was originally redirected based on the answer to a specific question in one of Stanford's quiz bowl packets. The page no longer exists and I can't find the original packet and specific question, but if I redirected it to palindrome, the question must have been about words that can be rotated into the same word or something like that. If it has other uses beyond that, there's no reason not to redirect it somewhere else, especially if that page already has a section on the topic since the whole idea of a redirect is to send someone where they can find the information they're looking for when a certain topic doesn't have a standalone article. Some of the packets [https://web.archive.org/web/diff/20130923090705/20131015074627/quizbowl.stanford.edu/archive/ still exist on the wayback machine] and I could probably find the specific packet if anyone really want to know, but otherwise, it's just not worth the effort right now. Sesamehoneytart 06:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

== Levidrome ==

File:Right-pointing white arrow in blue rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was retarget

to Anadrome. ✗plicit 11:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

No mention at target; retargeting to Lucky_Budd#Career is an option though the target provides no explanation, which does exist on Wiktionary at wikt:levidrome. The concept appears to be covered by Anadrome, though, but without a mention. See also Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Levidrome and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 16#Semordnilap (it seems that "semordnilap" could now also be redirected to the anadrome article?). 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Comment this WAS mentioned at the target when the redirect was finalized back in 2020. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Anadrome, and can be mentioned in a paragraph there. It's still weird that Anadrome was even created separate from palindrome when anadrome has even less coverage than levidrome. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Anadrome now that it's mentioned there. --Un assiolo (talk) 14:29, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Alexadrome==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. ✗plicit 03:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

  • {{no redirect|1 = Alexadrome }} → :Palindrome  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: [{{fullurl:Alexadrome|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Alexadrome closed as keep}}}} keep]/[{{fullurl:Alexadrome|action=edit&summary={{Urlencode:main}}#Alexadrome closed as retarget}}}} retarget]/[{{fullurl:Alexadrome|action=delete&wpReason={{Urlencode:main}}#Alexadrome closed as delete}}&wpMovetalk=1}} delete] ] 

Not mentioned anywhere on the English Wikipedia. 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete – searching this exact word up on Google in quotation marks pulls up pretty much nothing of note anywhere, so I don't see a viable target. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 04:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete - In addition to the above, I also searched google for "+palin +alexa" to see if there was some meme or confluence between the two terms in some way, and came up with nothing of note. Does not appear to be a thing. Fieari (talk) 07:02, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete per the above editors' findings --Lenticel (talk) 00:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Canon Deutschland==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. ✗plicit 03:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

This German subsidiary of Canon is not mentioned at the target and does not to be mentioned anywhere on the English Wikipedia apart from two external links either. 1234qwer1234qwer4 01:39, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:Delete. A German subsidiary of a major company with little information covered on its target page is not a reason alone to be a redirect InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 13:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 11:19, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Punk opera==

File:Symbol move vote.svg Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 10%23Punk opera

==World's rarest butterfly==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. ✗plicit 03:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Unmentioned in this form. 'Rarest' is somewhat vague. WP:NOTTRIVIA. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 00:41, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Keep - Search term appears to be accurate, both in terms of global population, and also in terms of the size of the area of their habitat. The article itself mentions that Parides burchellanus is also extremely endangered, but it appears that the population and habitat area of the latter is slightly larger in both cases. While I wouldn't say that the article itself should state that it is the "world's rarest butterfly" (at least not without a WP:RS using those exact words) a redirect is far less user facing and so it should be harmless to keep this redirect, given that it does appear to be true. Fieari (talk) 07:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

::{{reply to|Fieari}} I would disagree in regard to the harmlessness. If a reader stumbles upon this when searching or types this in and arrives here, etc., it is harmful if it is not true. If it would not be appropriate to say something in an article, many times it should also not be said in a redirect. However, I would still have (albeit much smaller) qualms if it were sourced and mentioned due to the phrasing and nature of this page title (per the spirit of the NOT policy I mentioned earlier and the potential vagueness of 'rare'). As far as I can tell, there are not any other article titles or redirects that begin with "world's rarest". — Godsy (TALKCONT) 07:18, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:Delete "World's rarest butterfly" is quite hard to measure, and not something we should state with the level of confidence to literally make it as a redirect. "Appears to be true" isn't the level of confidence we need to redirect users searching it to this page. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 08:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:Neutral as redirect maker, as it is technically true, but is probably peacockery on my part at best. Sir MemeGod :D (talk - contribs - created articles) 15:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:Delete, as even if it is true, it does seem to be solely peacockery, and it doesn't seem to be a somewhat notable title in itself the same way as World's tallest building. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 15:08, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete these kind of redirects are likely implausable and hard to measure. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

:Delete we shouldn't have redirects based on Google search type terms, especially when hard to judge like this. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:48, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

::We absolutely should have redirects based on terms like this when we have relevant verifiable content to target. This will help people who use these very plausible search terms both here and on third-party search engines. Thryduulf (talk) 10:29, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

:::unfortunately, the answer to "when" in this case is "not this time lmao". the target never directly refers to it as the "rarest" or "most endangered" butterfly in the world, and the world's 100 most threatened species only lists its population as "uh idk" cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

==Gamer mosley==

File:White x in red rounded square.svg Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was:

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The result of the discussion was delete

. ✗plicit 02:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

I don't know what this 20th century fascist has to do with gaming culture unless it is some 4chan reference. If someone can uncover a reasonable explanation for the relationship between these terms, I'll happily withdraw this RFD. Redirects created by new editor blocked for racism. Liz Read! Talk! 00:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

  • Delete and salt A Google search for the title confirms that it's an attempt to make a disgraced fascist look cool in the gaming community and clearly an attempt to use a 'more innocent facist' to avoid the usual blocks of content involving Naziism; see [https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1583229683 this] where someone pretty much admits to modding Hearts of Iron IV game to 'fix a mistake' where Mr. Mosley was portrayed in a historically appropriate (and negative) light. We don't need to entertain this as serious. Nate • (chatter) 01:12, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete and salt per {{u|MrSchimpf}}. DrowssapSMM 12:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete and salt per others - assuming that "salting" means nothing will grow there again.  Mr.choppers | ✎  01:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete and salt - Yes, Mr.choppers, that's exactly what it means. Or more to the point, it means protecting it so that no new page of any sort can ever be created there again (without prior admin approval). Fieari (talk) 04:12, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Delete and salt per above and WP:NOTPROMO --Lenticel (talk) 00:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

:I don't have that strong a view on deletion or not because I'm unsure if this a plausible/useful redirect at all, but the idea it should be salted because of associations with misinformation is a poor one. If someone comes across this 'Gamer Mosley' would we not want them to stumble upon our article? What is the harm in someone who came across 'Gamer Mosley' getting directed to Oswald Mosley? Either they would have had their mind made up already or they will learn something new and reconsider what they read elsewhere. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:46, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

:Delete and Salt. No reasonable relationship exists, and based on the user's previous edits and ANI section, seems to be only an attempt to perpetuate or inappropriately humorify/whitewash Nazism and a main figure in it. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 14:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).