Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/BenH
= [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/BenH|BenH (2nd)]] =
{{rfcu box|case=BenH|filed=18:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC)}}
- {{checkuser|BenH}}
- {{checkip|76.5.145.169}}
- Supporting evidence: I have filed this under BenH (2nd) because of a pre-existing case. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/76.5.145.169 Here are the IPer's contributions.] If these edits are consistent with BenH's editing style, then he is evading his block. Willking1979 (talk) 18:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- User has used several other IP addresses for his vandalism. - NeutralHomer • Talk • January 13, 2009 @ 19:08
:{{clerknote}} Errr, the last contributions of BenH were in the summer of 2006. Got anything newer to compare with? -- lucasbfr talk 20:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
::Anything in this category can be used. - NeutralHomer • Talk • January 13, 2009 @ 22:19
:{{checkuser|Benh34}} might not be stale, if CUs wish to work with it. -- lucasbfr talk 22:38, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
{{inconclusive}}, technically. There might be a relationship -- it should be assessed on behavioural evidence.
class="messagebox"
| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add |
=== BenH ===
- {{checkuser|BenH}}
- {{checkip|71.2.17.3}}
71.2.17.3 makes EXTREMELY similar edits to permablocked user BenH, adding unverified dates and stubbing every article. I am nearly 100% sure on this. The edits to TV station articles are so similar it's haunting. CFIF (talk to me) 18:46, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
{{Declined}} His edits are too old to check. On the other hand, if his edits are extremely similar you can block anyway. I'd suggest taking this to the administrators' noticeboard. Mackensen (talk) 19:30, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.