Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Fact check

class="messagebox"

| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}
to the checkuser page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Pending&action=edit§ion=1 here]. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

=== Fact check ===

{{checkuser|Fact check}}

Fact check is a new user who immediately began removing any text with a {{fact}} attached. I find it remarkable that a new user would know to create a purpose specific name and from the get-go be enforcing a tiny part of policy without having a history here first. On the assumption that this was just a purpose specific account created by another user, I requested on his/her talk page that the user mention who they used to be/what their other ID is. The user has been cagey, asking why I need to know. Perhaps it's a completely innocent purpose driven account, but I'm beginning to wonder if it's possible that this user might be someone coming back as a new ID to sharpen a WP:POINT about verifiability. If a casual CU is possible, it would be nice to verify that this is not someone who is currently under censure. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 23:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

I've indentified the operator of the account, but as he's a user in good standing I'm not going to take any action. Mackensen (talk) 23:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

:Thanks, Mackensen! That's all I wanted to know. Regards, CHAIRBOY (☎) 01:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

This sounds like fishing. --zero faults User_talk:Zer0faults/Archive_1#Signature 01:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

:I'll be the judge of that, thank you very much. Mackensen (talk) 14:05, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

::Your welcome. --User:Zer0faults 01:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

How did you, in your decision come away with a conclusion that the user was not failing "Avoiding scrutiny from other editors" from WP:SOCK. If they were doing this to avoid comments to their main user about the WP:V policy as interpreted by those who placed the tags then they may be violating legitimate uses of sock puppets. Ansell 05:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

:Sorry, my bad. Did not realise the user had already been blocked for an inappropriate user name. Ansell 05:44, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.