Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Julie Dancer

class="messagebox"

| style="text-align: center" | If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}
to the checkuser page [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser&action=edit§ion=1 here]. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

= [[Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Julie Dancer|Julie Dancer]] =

{{checkuser|Julie Dancer}}
{{checkuser|Ἀριστοτέλης}}
{{checkuser|Adaptron}}
{{checkuser|Kadiddlehopper}}
{{checkuser|Mimus polyglottos}}
{{checkip|71.100.1.18}}

Code letter:F

Supporting evidence: User:Julie Dancer engaged in sockpuppetry at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Optimal classification, voting/commenting also as User:Adaptron [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Optimal_classification&diff=next&oldid=227653561 here], as User:71.100.167.93 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Optimal_classification&diff=prev&oldid=227718640 here], and admits to it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Optimal_classification&diff=next&oldid=227824106 here]. Since then Julie was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User:Julie+Dancer blocked] for harrassment, and I reblocked when the harrassment [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=229373954 continued].

The other accounts listed are obvious, based on their contributions. I'm hoping to see if a rangeblock on 71.100.0.0/16 would be effective, and if there are any other sleeper accounts hiding down there.

- Kevin (talk) 09:12, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

: {{confirmed}} - all of the above accounts - Alison ^❤ 09:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

:: Re. the rangeblock; a quick sweep shows no apparent sleeper accounts. However, due to the activity and number of editors on this range, as well as the level of abuse here, I do not recommend a rangeblock at this time. There will be far too much collateral damage - Alison ^❤ 09:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

:::Thanks Alison. I thought that might be the case. Her socks are pretty easy to spot, so they can be dealt with as they arise. Kevin (talk) 09:49, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.