Login
Login

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names/StrategicInsanityAd agency

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the username below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the discussion's talk page). No further edits should be made to this page.

{{#if:clear cut case of advertising[http://www.strategicinsanity.com/][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Introduction&diff=prev&oldid=120515213], giving username block and warning about spam HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 16:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)|The result was clear cut case of advertising[http://www.strategicinsanity.com/][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Introduction&diff=prev&oldid=120515213], giving username block and warning about spam HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 16:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)}}

 [view]

{{User|1=StrategicInsanityAd agency}}

It is a business name, and an ad agency at that. To me, the name itself screams "spam". It stretches WP:U, even if it doesn't break it. What do you think?

  • Comment By the looks of [ this edit], they're going to advertise in an article once they get the hang of it. Leebo T/C 16:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment A google search doesn't find any evidence that this is an actual company. If it's not a real biz, then logically the 'business name' rule wouldn't be in effect. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 16:43, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • That's certainly an odd edit, but I still wonder how they could exist without anything mentioning them on teh googles so far. There's more to this than meets the eye, I suspect. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 16:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the entries talk page). No further edits should be made to this page.