Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 18

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 25 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:19, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Culture of Albania}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Andorra}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Armenia}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Austria}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Azerbaijan}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Belarus}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Belgium}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Bosnia and Herzegovina}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Bulgaria}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Croatia}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Cyprus}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of the Czech Republic}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Denmark}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Estonia}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Finland}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of France}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Georgia (country)}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Germany}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Greece}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Hungary}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Iceland}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Ireland}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Italy}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Kazakhstan}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Latvia}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Liechtenstein}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Lithuania}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Luxembourg}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of the Republic of Macedonia}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Malta}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Moldova}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Monaco}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Montenegro}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of the Netherlands}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Norway}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Poland}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Portugal}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Romania}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Russia}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of San Marino}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Serbia}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Slovakia}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Slovenia}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Spain}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Sweden}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Switzerland}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Turkey}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Ukraine}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of the United Kingdom}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Abkhazia}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Kosovo}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Nagorno-Karabakh Republic}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Northern Cyprus}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of South Ossetia}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Transnistria }}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Åland}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of the Faroe Islands}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Gibraltar}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Guernsey}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of the Isle of Man}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Jersey}}
• {{Tfd links|Culture of Svalbard}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:24, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Created}}

I don't see the purpose of having this template. It looks similar to {{tl|unsigned}} or {{tl|user}} or {{tl|IP}}. Also, I don't know why the "creation log" link was given to notified people. It shows them logs of created articles, most of them deleted. I recently [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BuickCenturyDriver/sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=755473222 substituted] the template anyway. Unless I see the purpose of using it, this template shall be deleted. George Ho (talk) 06:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

• delete, better to use one of the myriad of other {{tl|user}} templates. Frietjes (talk) 16:50, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Created with R}}

No longer transcluded. Therefore, it should be deleted. George Ho (talk) 06:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

• delete, we can use {{tl|created with}} for low transclusion created with templates. Frietjes (talk) 14:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nom (non-admin closure) Pppery 02:23, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|CreatedFS}}

This notification template is no longer used as WP:featured sound candidates is inactive at the moment. It must be deleted. George Ho (talk) 06:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC); see below. 02:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

:No, there is no "must". There's no point whatsoever with dismantling a process that we should have due to inactivity. Speedy Keep: Harmful to restarting the process if deleted, harmless if kept. Do the option that doesn't cause harm. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 17:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

:: Okay, Adam. How about deprecated instead or historical? Seems a better alternative than "keep" or "delete". Better? --George Ho (talk) 02:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

:::I just don't see how any of them actually has any advantage. It's not like people are going to be stumbling across this. I simply don't think we should do things without any actual reason .Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 15:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

:::: Looking at archives of WT:Featured sound candidates recently, Adam, you seem very dedicated to have FS restored. If Featured Sounds mean everything to you... I don't know. It hasn't been active since 2011. I'll tell you what... I'll withdraw this nomination, so I'll not touch it for a while. Fair? --George Ho (talk) 21:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|1923–24 Ohio Athletic Conference men's basketball standings}}

Unused. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

• keep now that it is in use (added to the Ohio article). Frietjes (talk) 16:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|1924–25 Ohio Athletic Conference men's basketball standings}}

Unused. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

• keep now that it is in use (added to the Ohio article). Frietjes (talk) 16:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|2005 Baylor Lady Bears basketball navbox}}

Insufficient player blue links to be useful navigation. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

• Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to user space. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:17, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|1952–53 MCHL standings (men)}}

Unused. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:17, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

:I will use any/all of the MCHL, WIHL, WCHA, ECAC Hockey, etc... standings templates prior to 1970 when I am able to find the time to create the main pages for those seasons. In the meantime I've added links to some of the templates so that they aren't completely orphaned. PensRule11385 Talk 22:46, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

• move to userspace until there is an article to transclude it. Frietjes (talk) 14:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to user space. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:17, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|1951–52 MCHL standings (men)}}

Unused. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:17, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

:See above — Preceding unsigned comment added by PensRule11385 (talk • contribs) 22:47, December 11, 2016 (UTC)

• move to userspace until there is an article to transclude it. Frietjes (talk) 14:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Deodhar Trophy}}

Only 4 blue links. GXXF T • C 12:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

• Keep. I count six links. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 06:17, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
• keep, more than 4 links. Frietjes (talk) 17:22, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Use MLA style}}

Created 2012, unused. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

• delete, better to use edit notices. Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Use APA style}}

Created 2012, unused. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

• delete, better to use edit notices. Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 25 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Asian Cuisine}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).