Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 March 20

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by {{admin|Alexf}} AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Nryf}}

Unused. Created in 3 edits over 3 minutes edits on 10 September 2016‎ by User:AppleRED, then nothing. Purpose is unclear. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:56, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Global Force Wrestling employees}}

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Global Force Wrestling personnel. Same reasons, GFW hasn't a regular roster. It's impossible to create an article or template about it. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

• Delete: Support per nom. APM (talk) 02:57, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
• Delete I had deja vu when I saw this navbox and thought we already deleted it! Probably confused it with the roster article that we deleted earlier on. Either way it should be deleted with the same rationale.LM2000 (talk) 22:00, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete {{tl|Straight Edge Society}}, the rest have been relisted since they were never tagged. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:57, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Straight Edge Society}}
• Also proposing Template:Vince's Devils (suggestion made by APM) Template:The Ascension Template:The Brood Template:The Corre Template:The American Wolves Template:The Fabulous Kangaroos for the same reason

Small wrestling stable. Just 4 members, I don't think the SES needs a template for just 4 members. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

• Delete: Support per nom. Would also suggest a deletion of Template:Vince's Devils for similar reasons. APM (talk) 02:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
• Nice. I'm watching the category and I found some similar templates. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:08, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Routemap-Infobox|type=merge}}
• {{Tfd links|Infobox UK railway|type=merge}}

Propose merging Template:Routemap-Infobox with Template:Infobox UK railway.

Two templates serving basically the same purpose. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 14:41, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

• Perhaps the UK template (or both) should be merged into {{Tl|Infobox rail line}}? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:43, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
• {{re|Pigsonthewing}} Sounds like a good idea, although it would require a bot run to add {{para|subbox|yes}} or something. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
  to reply to me 04:42, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
• Support merge, oppose a further combination with {{Tl|Infobox rail line}}. Mackensen (talk) 14:25, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

• Merge. Useddenim (talk) 11:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
• Merge. We can consider other templates later. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 March 28 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:11, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Infobox name module|type=merge}}
• {{Tfd links|Infobox Chinese|type=merge}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2017 March 28 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:11, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Infobox Hindu temple|type=merge}}
• {{Tfd links|Infobox religious building|type=merge}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).