Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 20#Template:Design-EU

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Procedural close, already deleted by {{u|Fastily}}. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:59, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|A-Class-GA}}

A subst-only template to begin an A-class assessment process for a WikiProject currently marked as inactive.

Furthermore, even if the WikiProject were active, the template also uses the term 'GA' in its name, a common acronym for good articles. This is confusing and led to it erroneously being categorized with :Category:Wikipedia GA templates. e^πi (talk | contribs) 22:24, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:47, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|EdenCharacter}}

Unused character template (not quite sure if fictional or just Garden of Eden related), which was created in 2016 and only edited in the first 24 hours of creation. There are other infoboxes that are used either for fictional characters or real people. Gonnym (talk) 22:14, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

• Delete as unnecessary because other infoboxes are available and used instead. To comment on its purpose, it's Christianity-related, and was created by a sockpuppet of a user blocked for edit warring on Christianity-related pages. Note also that the similarly named template {{tlf|EdenCharacter2}} by the same user was deleted two years earlier. e^πi (talk | contribs) 00:09, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
• Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1920 through Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1929 to Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in the 1920s. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:55, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Aviation accidents and incidents in 1924}}

Navbox with just one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:26, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

• Merge Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1920 through Template:aviation accidents and incidents in 1929, inclusive, to Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in the 1920s or something like that. This and two other aviation accident year navboxes have been nominated for deletion (on different days) with the rationale that there aren't enough entries, apparently without considering the obvious solution of merging a decade of templates into one. There aren't many Wikipedia articles about notable aviation accidents in the 1920s, yet, but there are plenty as you progress through the later years of the navbox series. RecycledPixels (talk) 14:45, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

• Merge per Recycled. --Izno (talk) 14:17, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1920 through Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1929 to Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in the 1920s. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:55, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Aviation accidents and incidents in 1925}}

Navbox with just one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:05, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

• Delete if this was not being discussed I would have removed the one link as it doesnt point to an accident article. MilborneOne (talk) 08:34, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
• Comment {{ping|MilborneOne}} Even if it did have an independent article, one article is not sufficient for a NAVBOX. The primary task for a NAVBOX is for navigating between similar articles not lists. NAVBOX with two or less links get deleted around here routinely. I know, I have started many such TFDs....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:38, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
• Comment Thks William understood. MilborneOne (talk) 14:34, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
• Merge Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1920 through Template:aviation accidents and incidents in 1929, inclusive, to Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in the 1920s or something like that. This and two other aviation accident year navboxes have been nominated for deletion (on different days) with the rationale that there aren't enough entries, apparently without considering the obvious solution of merging a decade of templates into one. There aren't many Wikipedia articles about notable aviation accidents in the 1920s, yet, but there are plenty as you progress through the later years of the navbox series. RecycledPixels (talk) 19:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
• Merge per above. --Gonnym (talk) 15:14, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

• Merge per Recycled. --Izno (talk) 14:17, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 00:26, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|GT color}}
• {{Tfd links|GT lines}}
• {{Tfd links|GT stations}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/GT left/Cincinnati, Saginaw and Mackinaw Division}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/GT left/Detroit - Port Huron}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/GT left/Detroit and Milwaukee Division}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/GT left/Detroit – Port Huron}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/GT left/main}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/GT right/Detroit - Port Huron}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/GT right/Detroit and Milwaukee Division}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/GT right/Detroit – Port Huron}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/GT right/main}}

Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Grand Trunk Western Railroad. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 17:49, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

• Delete: The last 9 are just data storage, with one city name each. The first one is also data storage, with only {{code|000000}}. I will caveat by saying I haven't coded any LUA modules, but using a LUA dictionary for data storage seems like a more sustainable solution than a dozen disparate pages. e^πi (talk | contribs) 12:40, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 00:26, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|NYSW color}}
• {{Tfd links|NYSW lines}}
• {{Tfd links|NYSW stations}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NYSW left/Main Line}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NYSW right/Main Line}}

S-line templates for the New York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad; superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/New York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad and Module:Adjacent stations/Erie Railroad. Mackensen (talk) 17:24, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. See also my comments on the other two adjacent nominations: 1, 2. e^πi (talk | contribs) 13:26, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 00:26, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Erie stations}}
• {{Tfd links|Erie color}}
• {{Tfd links|Erie lines}}
• {{Tfd links|Erie style}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/Bradford}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/Cleveland-Youngstown}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/Cleveland–Youngstown}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/Main Line-New York}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/allegany}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/attica}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/b&sw}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/bergen}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/bradford}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/buffalo}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/caldwell}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/cleveland}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/ferry}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/jefferson}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/mahoning}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/main}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/middletown}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/mountmorris}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/newark}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/newcity}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/njny}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/northern}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/nygl}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/nysw}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/orange}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/piermont}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/ringwood}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/rochbranch}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/rochester}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/weehawken}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie left/wyoming}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/Bradford}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/Cleveland-Youngstown}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/Cleveland–Youngstown}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/Main Line-New York}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/allegany}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/attica}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/b&sw}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/bergen}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/bradford}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/buffalo}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/caldwell}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/cleveland}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/ferry}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/ferry 23rd}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/graham}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/jefferson}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/mahoning}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/main}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/middletown}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/mountmorris}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/newark}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/newcity}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/njny}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/northern}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/nygl}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/nysw}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/orange}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/piermont}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/ringwood}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/rochbranch}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/rochester}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/weehawken}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Erie right/wyoming}}

S-line templates for the Erie Railroad; superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Erie Railroad. All article space transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 17:07, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

• Delete. Phew! That was quite a few templates to review. Just like your other nomination, the vast majority of these are city name data storage, with only {{tl|Erie stations}}, {{tl|Erie color}}, {{tl|Erie lines}}, {{tl|Erie style}}, and {{tl|S-line/Erie right/nysw}} being more template-like. Once again, a LUA dictionary seems better than dozens of disparate pages (with the same caveat that I haven't coded any LUA modules.)
• {{ping|Mackensen}} I will also note as a matter of process that you should remove 8 of the pages from this nomination because they're redirects (see What not to propose for discussion here): {{-r|Template:S-line/Erie left/Bradford}}, {{-r|Template:S-line/Erie left/Cleveland-Youngstown}}, {{-r|Template:S-line/Erie left/Cleveland–Youngstown}}, {{-r|Template:S-line/Erie left/Main Line-New York}}, {{-r|Template:S-line/Erie right/Bradford}}, {{-r|Template:S-line/Erie right/Cleveland-Youngstown}}, {{-r|Template:S-line/Erie right/Cleveland-Youngstown}}, {{-r|Template:S-line/Erie right/Main Line-New York}}. It's also a waste of time to list them at RfD, because they can be deleted under G8 after the templates they redirect to are deleted. e^πi (talk | contribs) 13:19, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 00:26, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|2014–15 NIFL Premiership table}}
• {{Tfd links|2009–10 Iran Pro League table}}
• {{Tfd links|2008–09 Iran Pro League table}}
• {{Tfd links|2011 Malaysia Super League table}}
• {{Tfd links|2007 AFC Asian Cup group tables}}
• {{Tfd links|2011 AFC Asian Cup group tables}}
• {{Tfd links|2015 AFC Asian Cup group tables}}
• {{Tfd links|2010 Primera División Peruana season table}}

no longer needed after being merged (with attribution) with 2014–15 NIFL Premiership, 2008–09 Iran Pro League, 2009–10 Iran Pro League, ... Frietjes (talk) 13:26, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

• {{u|Frietjes}}, Template:2015 AFC Asian Cup group tables was previously merged from Template:2015 AFC Asian Cup Group A table, Template:2015 AFC Asian Cup Group B table, Template:2015 AFC Asian Cup Group C table and Template:2015 AFC Asian Cup Group D table. Did you also leave attribution for those templates? Hhkohh (talk) 10:54, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
• Hhkohh, yes, now added. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 08:37, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|2019/20 National League south table}}

unused Frietjes (talk) 13:24, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

• Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 08:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:09, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|2018 Road to the final1}}

unused Frietjes (talk) 13:23, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Yes I created this template few months ago, but unused , without any further discussion I want to be Delete this template , thanks(Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 14:04, 20 April 2019 (UTC))

:{{ping|Mr.Mani Raj Paul}} Based on your above comment, I've tagged it with {{tl|db-g7}}. You can also tag pages where you're the only substantial contributor yourself using that template (see WP:G7). e^πi (talk | contribs) 00:52, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:56, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|WikiProject Kilkenny}}

WikiProject Kilkenny was userfied in April 2011 to User:Mrchris/WikiProject Kilkenny per this MFD which I started, and the title {{noredirect|WP:WikiProject Kilkenny}} was redirected to WP:WikiProject Ireland. I dunno how the banner survived so long after the project was terminated, but it is absurd to have a project banner and associated category structure (see :Category:WikiProject Kilkenny articles plus subcats) for a non-project.

NB Please do NOT redirect this banner to :Template:WikiProject Ireland. The importance rating assigned in a Kilkenny-only context will be very differnet to those assigned in an all-Ireland context. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

: PS I have checked that all the non-userspace pages tagged with this project banner are tagged with {{WikiProject Ireland}}. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:57, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

• Delete along with the categories, probably qualifies as a {{tl|db-subpage}}. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:45, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 15. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Design-EU}}
• {{tfd links|Intellectual_property_laws_of_the_European_Union}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).