Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 December 8#Template:CueTracker player

=[[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 December 8|December 8]]=

== [[Template:German Empire Corps]] ==

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 December 16. (non-admin closure) Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 15:55, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

  • {{tfd links|German_Empire_Corps}}
  • {{tfd links|German_Empire_Armies}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

== [[Template:German Empire Divisions]] ==

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 December 16. (non-admin closure) Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 15:55, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

  • {{tfd links|German_Empire_Divisions}}
  • {{tfd links|German_Empire_Armies}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

== [[Template:Last updated 2]] ==

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by {{admin|RHaworth}} AnomieBOT 20:12, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

  • {{Tfd links|Last updated 2}}

This template has no documentation and the usage is not the same as its title. The template says, “Source: {{cn}}” -- Bank: Bank Robbery started a robbery (🚨) 08:00, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete as template creator, not necessary. S.A. Julio (talk) 14:58, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

== [[Template:Sailing at the 2020 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs]] ==

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} AnomieBOT 03:02, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

  • {{Tfd links|Sailing at the 2020 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCs}}

Unused; Content merged into the Sailing at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Qualification article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 06:50, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

== [[Template:CueTracker player]] ==

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:44, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

  • {{Tfd links|CueTracker player}}

Also nominating:

  • {{Tfd links|CueTracker season}}
  • {{Tfd links|CueTracker tournament}}

The template in question creates an external link to pages on our WP:BLACKLIST (see MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist). Whilst unreliable sources wouldn't be an issue if it were just unreliable, why should we promote external links to pages on our blacklist and have to go through these templates?

Currently used on a lot of pages, however if the site is considered to be on the spam blacklist, there should also be no need to replace the external link. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 19:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: "Also nominated" pages were not tagged

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * it has begun... 05:09, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).