Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 November 11#Template:Nevada Test Site Labeled Map

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Neotropical temperate coniferous forests}}

Unused and with only one link to an actual forest in South America. No informational value is presented. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:33, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:Delete. This is similar to the templates used by the Ecoregions WikiProject, but this particular one only includes one link to an ecoregion, and it's not a temperate coniferous forest. There's no real constructive use for this template.Tom Radulovich (talk) 02:51, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:11, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Nepal Monument row generic}}

Unused and monuments list templates are not titled with the word "generic". It's either row or header. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 19:54, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete first three and no consensus for the fourth'''. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:10, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Navi Mumbai Metro lines}}
• {{Tfd links|Navi Mumbai Metro stations}}
• {{Tfd links|Navi Mumbai Metro navbox}}
• {{Tfd links|Navi Mumbai Metro Line 1}}

The first two are unused. The navbox contains nothing but redirects to the Line 1 (Navi Mumbai Metro) article where the route is already laid out in table format. The same applies to the Line 1 template. Redundant as the route list is already on the article. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• delete the first three and keep the routemap. Frietjes (talk) 19:55, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

::The route map is the same as the navbox. Nothing but redirects to the same section of the mainspace. Don't see the benefit in keeping it. Much like a navbox it's supposed to link to articles related to the subject matter. This has no non-redirect links. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Nevada Test Site Labeled Map}}

Unused map. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 19:57, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Netchange}}

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 19:59, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Netball statistics legend}}

Unused and was probably abandoned as the only edit history is creation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• delete, not needed. Frietjes (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Navbox MPBL club}}

Unused and we don't use separate basketball club infoboxes for each basketball league. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• delete, not an infobox but still not needed when {{tl|navbox}} works fine. Frietjes (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Nerd}}

Not a template and unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:39, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• delete Frietjes (talk) 17:05, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 18. Izno (talk) 22:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|National_Ringette_League_teams_(2013-14)}}
• {{tfd links|National_Ringette_League_teams_(2014-15)}}
• {{tfd links|National_Ringette_League_teams_(2015-16)}}
• {{tfd links|National_Ringette_League_teams_(2016-17)}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 18. Izno (talk) 22:27, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Nagpur_Metro_lines}}
• {{tfd links|Nagpur_Metro_stations}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 18. Izno (talk) 22:27, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Nagoya_Municipal_Subway_color}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 18. Izno (talk) 22:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|NYCS_14th_IRT_terminal}}
• {{tfd links|NYCS_Complex_Layout_Fulton_Center}}
• {{tfd links|NYCS_Culver_IND_south_header}}
• {{tfd links|NYCS_Essex}}
• {{tfd links|NYCS_Jamaica_west_M}}
• {{tfd links|NYCS_Lexington_local_weekend}}
• {{tfd links|NYCS_Lexington_weekend}}
• {{tfd links|NYCS_Platform_Layout_Second_Avenue_Subway/Phase_2}}
• {{tfd links|NYCS_Second_weekend}}
• {{tfd links|NYCS_Sixth_Second}}
• {{tfd links|NYCS_Sixth_header}}
• {{tfd links|NYCS_Third-138th}}
• {{tfd links|NYCS_closed}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 18. Izno (talk) 22:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|NYC/E}}
• {{tfd links|NYC/P}}
• {{tfd links|NYC/W}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 18. Izno (talk) 22:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|NWSC_LegCo_members}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 November 18. Izno (talk) 22:29, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|NSW_Branch_lines_style}}
• {{tfd links|NSW_Main_lines_style}}
• {{tfd links|NSW_TrainLink_427_RDT}}
• {{tfd links|NSW_TrainLink_428_RDT}}
• {{tfd links|NSW_TrainLink_445_RDT}}
• {{tfd links|NSW_TrainLink_446_RDT}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:29, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|TSX: LMNL}}

Redundant to Template:Toronto Stock Exchange, which was created before this 2020 template. LMNL is for Liminal BioSciences, per the [https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/LMNL Toronto Stock Exchange]. The LMNL template isn't being used at Liminal BioScience's article. Also, both TSX templates point to the same website as well. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:06, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:38, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|New Rfa}}

Only used in creator's sandbox, we don't generally over-formalize RfAs like this. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:37, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:25, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|NewRFAStart}}

Unused and has been for several years. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete I think this was intended to be substituted, but regardless it seems to be part of an abandoned and unlikely-to-obtain-consensus 2008 restructure of the RfA process. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:25, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|New Flyer model codes}}

Unused and contains no useful information related to the New Flyer company. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|EC Judo Open}}

The template is redundant to a better-designed template. It is unused and all of its functionalities are included within Template:EC Judo. Deancarmeli (talk) 11:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Redundant. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Hbrpatahhet}}
• {{Tfd links|Hbrpatahayin}}
• {{Tfd links|Hbrkafs}}
• {{Tfd links|Hbrhiriqmems}}
• {{Tfd links|Hbrpes}}
• {{Tfd links|Hbrzzayin}}
• {{Tfd links|Hbryyod}}
• {{Tfd links|Hbrkkaf}}
• {{Tfd links|Hbrmmem}}
• {{Tfd links|Hbrnnun}}
• {{Tfd links|Hbrzzadi}}
• {{Tfd links|Hbrqqof}}
• {{Tfd links|Hbrsshin.}}

This type of template is no longer in use because WP:NIQQUD has been resolved. Did Q28 make a mess today? 11:28, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• No contest. - Gilgamesh (talk) 12:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
• :@Gilgamesh~enwiki what has replaced the usage of these templates, and why some such as Template:Hbrzerem are still in use? Should they be replaced as well? Gonnym (talk) 19:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
• ::{{yo-1|Gonnym}}: The other templates that are still in use should all be replaced and deleted. I don't have time to do this yet, but others can already do it.--Did Q28 make a mess today? 03:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
• ::Gonnym: What q28 said. Replace with the actual Unicode characters themselves, inline. - Gilgamesh (talk) 08:33, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete all per nom. I've merged these in to one nomination. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:Delete. I've replaced usages per Gilgamesh. Gonnym (talk) 17:57, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete all untranscluded templates in this list per WP:G7. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:51, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:30, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Kameʻeiamoku and Kamanawa family tree}}

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:59, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

• Keep for the moment, but if deletion is the consensus there are other templates. Way behind on these things...sorry.--Mark Miller (talk) 06:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
• :Not a reason to keep. Right now the template doesn't have any use. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. On Wikipedia, we judge Templates and anything else on a hear and now basis, not hypothetical future scenarios. This Template is unused and not needed. Just delete it, and it can be recreated in the future if a useful purpose is found. Newshunter12 (talk) 20:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 09:19, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Agreed with Newshunter12, templates should be kept/deleted based on the present, not speculation about the future. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
• delete or move to userspace. Frietjes (talk) 17:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:30, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|KOGL-type1}}

Unused license template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:10, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

• Keep as potentially useful. Please note that I marked it with {{tl|transclusionless}} to keep it off of reports. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:10, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

::Sure it would be potentially useful. But it's not useful at the moment. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:16, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete On Wikipedia, we judge Templates and anything else on a hear and now basis, not hypothetical future scenarios. This Template is unused and has been this way for apparently 8 years since creation. Just delete it. Newshunter12 (talk) 20:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 09:19, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete No need to keep unused local license templates, any future uploads can go to Commons. That is, if this is in fact a valid license in the first place, which isn't clear * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
• delete per the discussion at commons. Frietjes (talk) 17:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Kitchen of WikiProject India invitation}}

Not used. Not even by WikiProject India. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

:* Keep (disclaimer: page creator's vote!) I think we should keep this template. This does not have non-free media or other content where unused needs quick attention. This is a WikiProject activity invitation template, and has scope of usage. --Titodutta (talk) 07:38, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

• :Titodutta, has this template been used to invite users? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:16, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. Unused and no evidence of use. Newshunter12 (talk) 20:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete This is a subst-only template, so being unused is irrelevant, but I fail to see the value in keeping a template that [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?sort=create_timestamp_desc&search=%22you%27ll+find+many+delicious+Indian+cuisines+to+have+yourself+or+to+share+with+others%22&title=Special%3ASearch&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1&ns1=1&ns2=1&ns3=1&ns4=1&ns5=1&ns6=1&ns7=1&ns8=1&ns9=1&ns10=1&ns11=1&ns12=1&ns13=1&ns14=1&ns15=1&ns100=1&ns101=1&ns118=1&ns119=1&ns710=1&ns711=1&ns828=1&ns829=1&ns2300=1&ns2301=1&ns2302=1&ns2303=1 doesn't even seem to have been substituted since 2013]. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
• delete or move to userspace, not recently used. Frietjes (talk) 17:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:05, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Di-conflicted license-notice}}

i see no use this template has. Leomk0403 (talk) 08:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete This doesn't seem to be a standard speedy deletion criterion; we use {{tl|wrong license}} instead. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as nominator, this doesn't have any uses, it just exists. i feel that it is {{Awaitingadmin}}Leomk0403 (talk) 04:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:05, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Nobacklog}}

It seems that this template is no longer used, because it is now possible to do this automatically. Did Q28 make a mess today? 07:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:Delete. {{tl|Backlog}} can handle a threshold so this isn't needed. Gonnym (talk) 08:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

: Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:05, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|StatementTooLong}}

It looks like we don't have that restriction anymore, so maybe we can delete it. Did Q28 make a mess today? 07:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:49, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete There is still a word limit in arbitration proceedings (I wish people would be more careful when nominating templates for deletion), but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?sort=create_timestamp_desc&search=%22The+word+limit+is+500.+Please+refactor+it+within+%22&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1&ns1=1&ns2=1&ns3=1&ns4=1&ns5=1&ns6=1&ns7=1&ns8=1&ns9=1&ns10=1&ns11=1&ns12=1&ns13=1&ns14=1&ns15=1&ns100=1&ns101=1&ns118=1&ns119=1&ns710=1&ns711=1&ns828=1&ns829=1&ns2300=1&ns2301=1&ns2302=1&ns2303=1 this specific template doesn't seem to have been used since 2010]. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy. Izno (talk) 06:25, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|National Cycle Network Route 700}}

Unused. And only two links. Nothing beneficial in terms of navigation presented. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• Keep as creator and sole editor: one of a group of similar routemap diagrams for UK cycle routes. Will form part of Bay Cycle Way. A work in progress, though I had forgotten about it and will now continue. PamD 04:25, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
• Comment Now I remember more about it. I was overwhelmed by the complexity of the routemap syntax which I hadn't used before. Will have another go when feeling strong. Happy to have this work-in-progress userfied or draftified (not sure which is better for a template) while I learn how to build it. PamD 04:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:*Userfy, as creator. Presumably I shouldn't do so while the TfD is running... PamD 12:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:Userfy per above. Gonnym (talk) 08:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|New Zealand First MPs}}

Unused and redundant as the article of the MP's on this template are already featured on the New Zealand First template under the Former Parliamentarians section. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:Delete. Redundant to {{tl|New Zealand First}}. Gonnym (talk) 08:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. It's also out of date anyway. YttriumShrew (talk) 19:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|New Jersey year nav}}

Unused and filled with nothing but categories which navboxes shouldn't. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:26, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:Delete. Categories use {{tl|Year in US state category}}. Gonnym (talk) 08:53, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:30, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|New Zealand U-20 squad - 2016}}

Unused and there doesn't need to be a template for a team that didn't win the tournament. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:13, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete Per nom, unneeded template. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:29, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Next month}}

Unused and not needed. Has been around since 2009 and is unlikely to be used anywhere. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:54, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Noar Leumit Map 2009-10}}
• {{Tfd links|Noar Leumit Map 2010-11}}

Unused and unnecessary maps for Israeli football/soccer teams. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:18, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:Delete. 2009–10 Israeli Noar Leumit League and 2010–11 Israeli Noar Leumit League use different maps. Gonnym (talk) 08:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).