Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 13

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|WHM color}}
• {{Tfd links|WHM lines}}
• {{Tfd links|WHM stations}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM left/1}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM left/2}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM left/3}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM left/4}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM left/5}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM left/6}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM left/7}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM left/8}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM left/11}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM left/16}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM left/21}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM right/1}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM right/2}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM right/3}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM right/4}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM right/5}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM right/6}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM right/7}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM right/8}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM right/11}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM right/16}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WHM right/21}}

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Wuhan Metro. Gonnym (talk) 23:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:31, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|TJM color}}
• {{Tfd links|TJM lines}}
• {{Tfd links|TJM stations}}
• {{Tfd links|TJM style}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TJM left/1}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TJM left/2}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TJM left/3}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TJM left/4}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TJM left/5}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TJM left/6}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TJM left/9}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TJM right/1}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TJM right/2}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TJM right/3}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TJM right/4}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TJM right/5}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TJM right/6}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TJM right/9}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TJM right/TEDA}}

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Tianjin Metro. Gonnym (talk) 23:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Template:Timeline of the Mexican Revolution}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 13#Template:Timeline of the Mexican Revolution}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Template:Timeline of the Mexican Revolution}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the template's undeletion]. ✗plicit 00:10, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Timeline of the Mexican Revolution}}

Unused timeline that already is covered by the Mexican Revolution article already. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Template:Timeline of Royal Navy Ships}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 13#Template:Timeline of Royal Navy Ships}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Template:Timeline of Royal Navy Ships}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the template's undeletion]. ✗plicit 00:10, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Timeline of Royal Navy Ships}}

Unused navbox that's more decorative than anything else. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:58, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Template:Portugal geography}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 13#Template:Portugal geography}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Template:Portugal geography}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the template's undeletion]. ✗plicit 00:10, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Portugal geography}}

Unused and not related to geography in the truest sense. Just lists districts and regions of Portugal which is already covered either by Template:Portugal topics, Template:Districts and autonomous regions of Portugal, and/or Template:Regions of Portugal. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:11, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Atwell Racing}}

This navigation template is surplus to requirements. There is nothing substantial to navigate between 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: I have just had to restore this template which was moved and blanked by the creating editor, thus removing the deletion template and seeking to either prevent deletion or the discussion of deletion 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:25, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete: Doesn't offer anything practical to navigate between. Bsoyka (talk) 03:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:11, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Kecskeméti TE squad}}

Unused and outdated navbox for the Hungarian football club. No players currently on the team from their website have an article on the English Wikipedia. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:55, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:46, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - outdated and due to level the club plays at, even if we knew who the players were it would be full of redlinks and not merited. GiantSnowman 09:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete as per GS. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:11, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:26, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Rank of ADFC/CDT/AAC}}
• {{Tfd links|Rank of ADFC/CDT/AAFC}}
• {{Tfd links|Rank of ADFC/CDT/ANC}}
• {{Tfd links|Rank of UK/CDT/WJAC}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks Generalization of UK/CDT/CCF/RN/BLANK}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of NATO Armed Forces Commanders-in-Chief/Canada}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of NATO Armies/OF/None}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of NATO Armies/OR/None}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of NATO Armies/WO/Greece}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of NATO Armies/WO/Italy}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of NATO Armies/WO/Poland}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of NATO Armies/WO/Romania}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of NATO Armies/WO/Slovakia}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of NATO Navies/WO/Romania}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of NZCF/CDT/SCC}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of NZCF/CDT/SCC/FB}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of NZCF/OFF/ATC}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of NZCF/OFF/NZCC}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of NZCF/OFF/SCC}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Air Forces/OF/No Air Force}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Air Forces/OF/None}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Air Forces/OF/Trinidad and Tobago (Pre 2018)}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Air Forces/OR/No Air Force}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Air Forces/OR/None}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Air Forces/WO/None}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Air Forces/WO/Syria}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OF/Abkhazia}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OF/Artsakh}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OF/Iran (Army)}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OF/Manchukuo}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OF/None}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OF/Seychelles (Pre-2018)}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OF/Trinidad and Tobago (Pre 2018)}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OR/Manchukuo}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OR/None}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OR/Seychelles (Pre-2018)}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/OR/Trinidad and Tobago (Pre 2018)}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Armies/WO/None}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Navies/OF/No Navy}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Navies/OF/None}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Navies/OF/Seychelles (Pre-2018)}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Navies/OF/Trinidad and Tobago (Pre 2018)}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Navies/OR/No Navy}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Navies/OR/None}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Navies/OR/Trinidad and Tobago (Pre 2018)}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of RFA}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of RFA OR}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of Seborga VDF}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of UK/CDT/ALL}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of UK/CDT/CCF/ALL}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of UK/CDT/MOD/ALL}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of UK/CDT/Other/ALL}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of UK/CDT/VCC/RM/ALL}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of UK/OFF/CCF/RN}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of United States Navy}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and Insignia of the United States Navy/OF/Blank}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and insignia of NATO/Generic/Army}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks and insignia of NATO Armies/OF/Turkey-small}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks of UK/CDT/WelbeckDSFC/DESG}}
• {{Tfd links|Ranks of UK/CDT/WelbeckDSFC/Services}}

Unused military rank templates. Don't see the point in having templates for countries that are not members of the NATO alliance. Just takes up space for no point since all of these were created and haven't been transcluded anywhere. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:20, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete I think I nominated the NATO warrant officer templates (the ranks are not actually classified by NATO as warrant officer pay grade despite the native names) a long time ago before, kind of forgot what happened. I am not active in this space anymore but I am definitely for deleting unused stuff.--Officer781 (talk) 15:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:29, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Girl Meets World}}

Delete: Need at least a dozen links for a category or template to be useful. Especially when you consider episode and character lists don't belong on here, this template is useless. It's useless, regardless. Amaury • 04:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. The lists of episodes and characters could be merged to {{tl|Boy Meets World}} but is not necessary. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:48, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
• Merge/redirect to {{tl|Boy Meets World}} as part of the same franchise -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 April 20. ✗plicit 11:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Dubious?}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Qingdao F.C. squad}}

team is defunct; no need for a current squad template. Qby (talk) 08:20, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 09:46, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - defunct club = no current squad = no need for a 'current squad' template. GiantSnowman 09:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete we don't keep current squad templates for defunct teams. If team exists again in the future, then and only then, it can be recreated. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy. ✗plicit 14:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|AthleteTimeline}}

Created in 2020, used only in one user sandbox page. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
• I am the creator of this template. I might pick this project up again at a later date. I would like to request that we postpone for one year. If there are regulations for deletions, then I am not inclined to challenge any decision. Bamkin (talk) 03:27, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
• Userfy for continued development. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:35, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Bangladesh women's national cricket team current squad}}
• {{Tfd links|India Women's Cricket Team}}

National teams don't really have a "current squad" in the same way as a domestic team does - it varies from series to series, and neither of these templates have been updated consistently, so are massively out-of-date. No equivalent templates exist for other women's national teams that I can see (or for men's teams). Just does not seem to be a coherent enough category to warrant a template - at least the current squad sections on national team pages can include an explanation of inclusion criteria. Mpk662 (talk) 14:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom, national teams don't have fixed current squads. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:35, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. There's no such thing as a "current squad" in this context. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:56, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:54, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:12, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Coconut Records}}

Two articles for albums for a solo project that already link to and from one another, so this navbox does not provide any additional navigational benefit. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:31, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:13, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Wuhan Metro line name}}

replaced by template:rail color box Frietjes (talk) 16:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 12:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Taxonomy/Anthropoidipes}}

Unused taxonomy template for a cryptid that has not been shown to exist or have existed. It is, appropriately, not used at Bigfoot and can easily be recreated if that cryptid is proved to exist. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
• Comment I've marked this as unnecessary so will get removed eventually. No drama. YorkshireExpat (talk) 16:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G2. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|WWW.BILLYMEIERUFOCASE.COM}}

This template appears to advertise Billy Meiers quarterly newsletter. It is used exclusively for disruptive editing at Billy Meier. JimRenge (talk) 17:55, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

: I don't think this even requires a discussion and speedy deletion can just be requested, as per WP:VANDALISM / WP:DE. Amaury • 18:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

::Yep. -Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 18:07, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).