Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 7#Template:Coord/negzeropad

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Mumbai City FC departments}}

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. The more comprehensive {{tl|Mumbai City FC}} is used instead. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Mumbai City FC has an inline version. Personally I'm not a fan of these. A navbox is a better approach, especially since only a small minority of readers are going to be interest in 2nd team/youth stuff. Nigej (talk) 07:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|NBL SKP}}

No transclusions. Links to Southern Melbourne Saints, which does not contain the string "puma" and which already has a team template shortcut at {{tl|NBL SKS}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete. Surely this system of creating umpteen 1-line templates needs to be changed. Based it seems around {{tl|NBLMatchSummaryLine2}}. Nigej (talk) 08:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

:Comment: not that I understand why sports teams need a template to handle linking unlike everything else on the wiki, but if we really, {{em|really}} need a system like this, then we can use something like {{tl|NBL team}} (as the name, not the infobox it currently redirects to) to at least reduce it to one template. Gonnym (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

::Indeed, there's no need at all. Just use the team name. If a team changes it's name we can handle that with a redirect, all this stuff is completely pointless. Nigej (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|GMA Artist Center}}

No transclusions, possibly due to some related category or article moves. {{tl|GMA Network Inc.}} is more comprehensive, although it does not contain all of these links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Borderline promotional, mainly listing the members of the board. Nigej (talk) 07:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Weiya}}
• {{Tfd links|Shangsi}}
• {{Tfd links|Qixi}}
• {{Tfd links|Mid-Autumn}}
• {{Tfd links|Laba Festival}}

Unused Chinese calendar date templates. I've imported 3 of the missing to Module:Calendar date/events so functionality is preserved. Gonnym (talk) 08:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Electorates of New Zealand, 2002–2008}}
• {{Tfd links|Electorates of New Zealand, 2008–2014}}
• {{Tfd links|Electorates of New Zealand, 2014–2020}}

Follow-up to comments made at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 31#Template:Electorates of New Zealand, 2020–2026. The problem with them is that are only used at parent articles like 2005 New Zealand general election which already contain the complete list in the article. They never appear in the child articles like Auckland Central. So overall they don't have any navigational benefit. Nigej (talk) 08:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

:I have no objection to deletion, but would these serve a worthwhile purpose if they were transcluded into each respective electorate article? — HTGS (talk) 19:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

::The trouble is that we'd end up with more and more navboxes in each article. Nigej (talk) 20:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. The usage of these navigation template is not to reproduce content but to offer navigation between related articles. Template:Electorates of New Zealand and Template:Historical electorates of New Zealand do that. There is no need for the creation of these each N years. Gonnym (talk) 07:58, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Pluto compared}}

Unused and Pluto#Mass and size uses a much simpler approach to show the same image. Nigej (talk) 08:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Urhixidur (talk) 12:51, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:59, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Plymouth Canada timeline}}

Unused. One of those unintelligible style of timelines. See Plymouth (automobile) for ones that are used. Nigej (talk) 08:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:59, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Governors General of Canada timeline}}

Unused except that it appears as a link at {{tl|Governor General of Canada}} as if it was an article. The reality is that List of governors general of Canada covers the subject and this adds nothing. Nigej (talk) 08:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:59, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Canon RF Mount zoom lenses timeline}}

Unused navbox in the style of a timeline. Replaced by {{tl|Canon RF Mount Lenses Timeline}} (see below) Nigej (talk) 09:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:59, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Canon RF Mount Lenses Timeline}}

Navbox used in just 1 article Canon RF lens mount and with nearly all red links. Also the timeline approach is not suitable for a navbox which is entirely focused on navigating between articles. Nigej (talk) 09:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Canon EOS MILC cameras}}

Unused navbox in the style of a timeline. Duplicated by the last part of {{tl|Canon EOS digital cameras}}. Nigej (talk) 09:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

: My proposal was initially to split the two timeline "DSLR" and "MILC" to avoid one enormous timeline, like i said here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Canon_EOS_digital_cameras#Split_Timeline_DSLR_and_MILC Gribouilleuse42 (talk) 11:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Fiat Automobiles timeline (Europe) 1960-1989}}

Unused and replaced by {{tl|Fiat timeline 1940-1979}} and {{tl|Fiat timeline 1980–2019}}. Nigej (talk) 09:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Timeline of the history of Chile}}

Timeline that adds nothing to {{tl|Chile topics}} and the articles that link from there like Timeline of Chilean history. Nigej (talk) 09:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Timeline of Japanese era names}}

No transclusions but links from Japanese era name#Overview. Timeline that duplicates {{tl|Japanese era names}} which is much clearer. Nigej (talk) 09:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. The used template is much more clearer. Gonnym (talk) 07:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Rover vehicles timeline since 1980}}

Unused. Superseded by {{tl|Rover, MG, BL Austin and BL Land Rover vehicles timeline since 1980}}. Nigej (talk) 11:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Rabbinic timeline}}

Unused. Superseded by {{tl|Rabbinical eras timeline}}. Nigej (talk) 11:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Indeed superseded by said template. Debresser (talk) 17:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Pontiac timeline 1950s to 1980 (detailed version)}}

Unused. Basically the same as {{tl|Pontiac timeline 1950s to 1980}}. Nigej (talk) 11:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:09, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball group A standings}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball group B standings}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game A1}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game A2}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game A3}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game A4}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game A5}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game A6}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game A7}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game A8}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game A9}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game A10}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game A11}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game A12}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game A13}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game A14}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game A15}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game B1}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game B2}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game B3}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game B4}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game B5}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game B6}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game B7}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game B8}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game B9}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game B10}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game B11}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game B12}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game B13}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game B14}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game B15}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game C1}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game C2}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game C3}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game C4}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game D1}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game D2}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game E1}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball game E2}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games England netball team roster}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games Fiji netball team roster}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games Malawi netball team roster}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games New Zealand netball team roster}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games Saint Vincent and the Grenadines netball team roster}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games South Africa netball team roster}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games Australia netball team roster}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games Barbados netball team roster}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games Jamaica netball team roster}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games Samoa netball team roster}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games Singapore netball team roster}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games Wales netball team roster}}
• {{Tfd links|2006 Commonwealth Games netball convenience template navbox}}

I see that at eg Ice hockey at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Men's team rosters#Canada we're using named sections and then at Canada at the 2022 Winter Olympics#Ice hockey we can use {{#section:Ice hockey at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Men's team rosters|CAN}} to get the content there. Seems a much better approach than the misnamed "convenience templates". I have converted the templates at Netball at the 2006 Commonwealth Games to this style and those listed are now unused. I know this is a drop in the ocean compared to the thousands of these we have but it seems to me that, as a minimum we ought to be putting an end to future creations of these "convenience templates"'. Comments would be appreciated, especially links to earlier discussions. Nigej (talk) 12:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete. Having created similar templates for the 2022 Games (as you know) I felt they were a useful tool, not knowing about the use of named sections at the time. Now, I agree your approach is more efficient and the above templates are no longer needed. Edvid (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
• Delete I was the one who created all of the above templates back in 2012 when this was this way be displayed this content across several pages. With the section links now used these can be deleted. – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:05, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Smithfield Foods}}

Unused sidebar for Smithfield Foods. Overly detailed and unusable. Nigej (talk) 13:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:43, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Socionics table}}

Unused table relating to Socionics. Socionics#The 16 types looks like it has a table covering this. Nigej (talk) 13:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:08, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|The Bill character biographies toc}}

Unused as the articles they were used on were redirected last year. Gonnym (talk) 14:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:45, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|League memberships TPS}}

Unused. League positions of the Turun Palloseura soccer team in graphical form, from where it was deleted some time back. Covered by Turun Palloseura#Season to season. Nigej (talk) 14:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:51, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|League memberships of Eintracht Frankfurt}}

Unused. Vertical timeline of the league positions of Eintracht Frankfurt. Covered by Eintracht Frankfurt#League results etc. Nigej (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:57, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Learningblocks}}

Unused WP:NAVBOX with just 2 links. Both articles are accessible from the other's infobox. Nigej (talk) 14:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. In a situation like this a see also section would be enough. Gonnym (talk) 07:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|List LDS Temple Australia Map}}
• {{Tfd links|List LDS Temple South America Map}}

Unused maps after the navboxes they were used on were deleted. Gonnym (talk) 15:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|A-League 2012-2013 map}}

Unused map of soccer team locations. The {{tl|A-League 2012–2014 map}} style seems to be preferred and is used at 2012–13 A-League. Nigej (talk) 15:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:38, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 18:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Arsenal F.C. hit singles}}

Unused navbox covered by the "singles" line in {{tl|Arsenal F.C.}}. Nigej (talk) 15:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• I have no recollection at all of creating this and don't see any reason for it to be kept given that it has been merged into another template -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:38, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 18:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Arizona engineering colleges with ABET-accredited programs}}

Unused navbox. We have an article ABET but I can't believe this is a defining aspect of these colleges. Nigej (talk) 15:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR 10RT20 Junior Women Individual}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR 10RT20 Junior Women Teams}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR 10RT20MIX Junior Women Individual}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR 10RT20MIX Junior Women Teams}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR 10RTW Junior Women Individual}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR 10RTW Junior Women Teams}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR AP40 Junior Women Final}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR AP40 Junior Women Individual}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR AP40 Junior Women Teams}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR AR60W Junior Women Final}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR AR60W Junior Women Qualification}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR AR60W Junior Women Teams}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR DT120 Junior Women Individual}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR DT150W Junior Women Individual}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR DT150W Junior Women Teams}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR R3X40 Junior Women Final}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR R3X40 Junior Women Qualification}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR R3X40 Junior Women Teams}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR R60PR Junior Women Individual}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR R60PR Junior Women Teams}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR SK125W Junior Women Final}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR SK125W Junior Women Qualification}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR SK125W Junior Women Teams}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR SK75 Junior Women Individual}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR SP Junior Women Final}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR SP Junior Women Teams}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR STR3X20 Junior Women Individual}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR STR3X20 Junior Women Teams}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR STR60PR Junior Women Individual}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR STR60PR Junior Women Teams}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR TR125W Junior Women Final}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR TR125W Junior Women Qualification}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR TR125W Junior Women Teams}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR TR75 Junior Women Individual}}
• {{Tfd links|Shooting WR TR75 Junior Women Teams}}

All of these templates are either unused (16 of them) or single-use article content. I recommend subst (as needed) and delete for all of them. There are a few remaining templates in the misnamed {{cl|Shooting junior women's world record navigational boxes}} that are used in two or more articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Subst/delete Very unsatisfactory way of organising things. Must be a better way. Doesn't the named section approach noted above at #2006 Commonwealth Games netball convenience templates work? Nigej (talk) 16:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
• Comment: There are more of these templates in {{cl|Shooting world record navigational boxes}} if someone wants to make a similar nomination. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:49, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|S-line/IRE-BW left/50}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/IRE-BW right/50}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/RapidRide right/B}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/RB-BW left/56}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/RB-BW left/57}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/RB-BW right/56}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/RB-BW right/89}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/RE-BW left/57}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/RE-BW right/57}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/STExpress left/550}}

No transclusions. Migrated to Module:Adjacent stations. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 February 15. Izno (talk) 00:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Attitude_Era_series}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|S-line/Montreal Metro left/1}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Montreal Metro left/2}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Montreal Metro left/4}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Montreal Metro left/5}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Montreal Metro right/1}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Montreal Metro right/2}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Montreal Metro right/4}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Montreal Metro right/5}}
• {{Tfd links|Montreal Metro stations}}
• {{Tfd links|Montreal Metro style}}
• {{Tfd links|Montreal Metro color}}
• {{Tfd links|Montreal Metro lines}}

No transclusions. Migrated to use :Module:Adjacent stations/Montreal Metro. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete, per past consensus of Adjacent stations migrations. BLAIXX 00:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Vietnam Provinces Image Map}}

Unused map replaced by {{tl|Provinces of Vietnam}} (see edit history of this) at Provinces of Vietnam. Nigej (talk) 17:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|1=Coord/display/display=inline,title}}

The edit summary at creation says "created to catch potential errors", but it is not needed. Wikipedia:Database reports/Transclusions of non-existent templates will show transclusions of this template name, and it is checked and cleaned out multiple times per week by gnomes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 07:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Coord/display/inline,title}}
• {{Tfd links|Coord/display/inline}}
• {{Tfd links|Coord/display/title}}
• {{Tfd links|Coord/link}}
• {{Tfd links|Coord/input/dec}}
• {{Tfd links|Coord/input/d}}
• {{Tfd links|Coord/input/dm}}
• {{Tfd links|Coord/input/ERROR}}
• {{Tfd links|Coord/input/error2}}
• {{Tfd links|Coord/input/nolat}}
• {{Tfd links|Coord/negzeropad}}
• {{Tfd links|Coord/prec dec}}
• {{Tfd links|Coord/input/dms}}

All of these templates are remnants of the pre-Lua version of :Template:coord. They are no longer transcluded except in a couple of sandboxes and talk page archives. Some of them existed only to generate error messages. They can all be deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 07:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Oslo Metro and Tramway next}}

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Appears to duplicate, or be an unused fork of, {{tl|Oslo Metro next}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Even {{tl|Oslo Metro next}} seems like a likely candidate to to be replaced with {{tl|Adjacent stations}} Gonnym (talk) 07:53, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Ambiga Sreenevasan series}}
• {{Tfd links|Anwar Ibrahim series}}
• {{Tfd links|Karpal Singh series}}
• {{Tfd links|Lim Kit Siang series}}
• {{Tfd links|Mahathir Mohamad series}}
• {{Tfd links|Muhyiddin Yassin series}}
• {{Tfd links|Najib Razak series}}
• {{Tfd links|Tunku Abdul Rahman series}}

A number of related sidebar in :Category:Malaysia political leader sidebar templates. The problem is that most are only used in one article (1 in none, 2 in two) so fail an important aspect of a WP:SIDEBAR. If there's really a "series" of articles the sidebar would appear in many articles. The reality is that these are designed for use in one article with a long list of other articles that the person is noted in. not "a grouping of links used in multiple related articles". Nigej (talk) 21:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

:I'll try and see if the sidebars can be used. Generally, these political figures are intertwined in the same political events so it's a little problematic when you have to add 2-3 sidebars in the same article, for instance. PenangLion (talk) 07:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. A majority of links are related in passing and feels very SYNTH and OR-ish. And none of the individuals have their own categories which adds a level of making these sidebars unnecessary to have. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|New York Cosmos squad}}

team is on hiatus; there is no current squad Joeykai (talk) 22:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete The league has restarted without them, so best deleted I think. Nigej (talk) 07:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:38, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 18:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).