Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 30#Unused Pas de templates

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|SNDX color}}
• {{Tfd links|SNDX lines}}
• {{Tfd links|SNDX lines/branches}}
• {{Tfd links|SNDX stations}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/SNDX left/North}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/SNDX left/South}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/SNDX right/North}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/SNDX right/South}}

{{t1|S-line}} templates for Sounder commuter rail. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Sound Transit. Mackensen (talk) 19:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Only used on a very old user sandbox. Gonnym (talk) 23:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

::Would seem that the other services covered by the module (such as Template:STLinkLR lines) are only used in a couple of user's sandboxes. Gonnym (talk) 11:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: {{U|Mackensen}}, please ensure that each of the nominated templates is properly tagged and that their creators have been notified, per the normal process. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|DDL Tournaments}}

All articles included in this template were deleted through PRODs so it is unused. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:10, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. No links Nigej (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Ddl tournaments}}

Unused; all links now deleted. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. No links Nigej (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:16, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Cincinnati Subway color}}
• {{Tfd links|Cincinnati Subway lines}}
• {{Tfd links|Cincinnati Subway stations}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Cincinnati Subway left/Main Line}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Cincinnati Subway right/Main Line}}

{{t1|S-line}} templates for the Cincinnati Subway. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Cincinnati Subway. Mackensen (talk) 18:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 23:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: {{U|Mackensen}}, please ensure that each of the nominated templates is properly tagged and that their creators have been notified, per the normal process. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:15, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Pas de cinq 2W3M}}
• {{Tfd links|Pas de cinq 2 (3 columns)}}
• {{Tfd links|Pas de dix 2 (3 columns)}}
• {{Tfd links|Pas de onze}}
• {{Tfd links|Pas de quatre 3W1M}}
• {{Tfd links|Pas de sept 3W4M}}
• {{Tfd links|Pas de trois 2 (3 columns)}}

Unused templates relating to ballet. There are a total of 20 of these templates at :Category:Ballet templates but this nomination only covers 7 unused ones. The others are used at sub-pages of User:Robertgreer/sandbox/NYCB. Following this TfD: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 February 19#Ballet multicolumn formatting templates and this AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of New York City Ballet 2012 repertory, the articles that used these have, I believe, all been deleted. Another of these was deleted recently Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 3#Template:Pas de onze 5W6M. Nigej (talk) 18:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC).

:Delete all as unused. I would also delete the complete set as they are only used in a single editor's very old sandboxes. Gonnym (talk) 23:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• delete all per prior discussion. Frietjes (talk) 14:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
• Delete all as stated above. Corachow (talk) 17:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Localparties danish regional 2013}}

Used only on Talk:2017 Danish local elections. Best to be substituted on there as it is unlikely for this to be used on any relevant spaces. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Subst/delete per nom. Single-use article (in this case, talk page) content. Nigej (talk) 18:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Folketing members category navigation}}

Template with a chart design format for the Folketing member categories. But hard to easily navigate through or with and takes up a lot of space on the category pages. Best to just navigate with :Category:Members of the Folketing by term. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Actually a handicap to navigation since it takes up the whole initial screen. Surely {{tl|Navseasoncats}} or similar would be much better, but I'm no expert. Nigej (talk) 17:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:23, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Turkish Open Tournaments}}
• {{Tfd links|Iceland Open Tournaments}}

Fewer than five links. Fails NENAN. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete both Two darts tournaments. In one case we have 2, the other 3, events for which there are articles. Realistically readers are going to navigate via the parent articles and perhaps the infobox. Nigej (talk) 16:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:14, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Japanese Collaboration candidate}}
• {{Tfd links|Current Japanese Collaboration}}

Not active since 2007 and still used on talk pages. Remove and delete. Gonnym (talk) 16:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete There are no "candidates" any more. Best cleared out. Nigej (talk) 16:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Template:Past cotw ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia:Collaboration_of_the_week/Template:Past_cotw&hidelinks=1&limit=500 transclusions])
• Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Template:COTWnow ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia:Collaboration_of_the_week/Template:COTWnow&hidelinks=1&hideredirs=500 transclusions]

Used as a template on article talk pages for a process that has been dead since 2016. Usages should be removed and template deleted. Nominating its unused siblings as well so it won't be used in the future. Gonnym (talk) 16:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and previous similar deletions. Nigej (talk) 07:40, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|HRT color}}
• {{Tfd links|HRT lines}}
• {{Tfd links|HRT stations}}
• {{Tfd links|Tide style}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/HRT left/Red}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/HRT left/red second phase}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/HRT right/Red}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/HRT right/red second phase}}

{{t1|S-line}} templates for Hampton Roads Transit. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Hampton Roads Transit. Mackensen (talk) 15:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 23:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: {{U|Mackensen}}, please ensure that each of the nominated templates is properly tagged and that their creators have been notified, per the normal process. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Welcome-Child}}

I understand the intention with which this was created but worry that the benefits of this sparsely-used template are outweighed by at least two issues. First, I don't think we should be adding a specific template to the talk pages of users that we think are young children. Second, there is a possibility that the recipient will interpret the second paragraph as a prompt to confirm whether they are a young child, which they should not do if they actually are. Using one of the generic welcome templates and taking a more discreet approach would be preferable. DanCherek (talk) 15:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:I'm leaning delete in support of nom's argument of outing a young editor. It might be worth adding a line about young editors to the standard template. Gonnym (talk) 15:35, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

:Delete Not keen. As noted, it might be used to try and get a response from a child, exactly the opposite of its intention. Nigej (talk) 20:43, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 15:05, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Tren Urbano color}}
• {{Tfd links|Tren Urbano lines}}
• {{Tfd links|Tren Urbano stations}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Tren Urbano left/Red}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Tren Urbano right/Red}}

{{t1|S-line}} templates for Tren Urbano. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Tren Urbano. Mackensen (talk) 14:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 15:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: {{U|Mackensen}}, please ensure that each of the nominated templates is properly tagged and that their creators have been notified, per the normal process. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 15:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Honolulu Rail Transit color}}
• {{Tfd links|Honolulu Rail Transit lines}}
• {{Tfd links|Honolulu Rail Transit stations}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Honolulu Rail Transit left/Honolulu Rail Transit}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Honolulu Rail Transit right/Honolulu Rail Transit}}

{{t1|S-line}} templates for Honolulu Rail Transit. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Honolulu Rail Transit. Mackensen (talk) 14:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 15:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: {{U|Mackensen}}, please ensure that each of the nominated templates is properly tagged and that their creators have been notified, per the normal process. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 15:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Rock Island Line color}}
• {{Tfd links|Rock Island Line lines}}
• {{Tfd links|Rock Island Line stations}}
• {{Tfd links|Rock Island Line style}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line left/Bureau-Peoria}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line left/Des Moines-Washington}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line left/Estherville-Iowa Falls}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line left/Geary-Enid}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line left/Memphis}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line left/Minneapolis-Burlington}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line left/Minneapolis-Houston}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line left/Rocky Mountain Rocket}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line left/Watertown-Cedar Rapids}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line left/main}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line right/Bureau-Peoria}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line right/Des Moines-Washington}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line right/Estherville-Iowa Falls}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line right/Keokuk}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line right/Memphis}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line right/Minneapolis-Burlington}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line right/Minneapolis-Houston}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line right/Rocky Mountain Rocket}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line right/Watertown-Cedar Rapids}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/Rock Island Line right/main}}

{{t1|S-line}} templates for the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad. Mackensen (talk) 14:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 15:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: {{U|Mackensen}}, please ensure that each of the nominated templates is properly tagged and that their creators have been notified, per the normal process. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:57, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|TMTC color}}
• {{Tfd links|TMTC lines}}
• {{Tfd links|TMTC stations}}
• {{Tfd links|TMTC style}}
• {{Tfd links|WES color}}
• {{Tfd links|WES lines}}
• {{Tfd links|WES stations}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TMTC left/Blue}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TMTC left/Green}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TMTC left/Mall Shuttle}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TMTC left/Orange}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TMTC left/Red}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TMTC left/Yellow}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TMTC right/Blue}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TMTC right/Green}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TMTC right/Mall Shuttle}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TMTC right/Orange}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TMTC right/Red}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/TMTC right/Yellow}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WES left/main}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/WES right/main}}

{{t1|S-line}} templates for various services in the Portland, Oregon area. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/TriMet and Module:Adjacent stations/Portland Streetcar. Mackensen (talk) 14:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 15:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: {{U|Mackensen}}, please ensure that each of the nominated templates is properly tagged and that their creators have been notified, per the normal process. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Creation of a broader template can be handled irrespective of this closure. ✗plicit 13:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Tributary of Iecava river}}
• {{Tfd links|Tributary of Misa river (Latvia)}}

Unused Latvian river navboxes, mostly red links Nigej (talk) 13:28, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:Delete or create a Template:Rivers in Latvia navbox with other river articles. Gonnym (talk) 23:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

::See :Category:Rivers of Latvia. If decided to create, I can handle this (please ping). Gonnym (talk) 15:34, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|United Kingdom submarine template below links}}

Intended to provide a standard 2 links in the below section of submarine templates, but is unused since all the templates in :Category:United Kingdom submarine templates: {{tl|A class submarine (1903)}}, etc. have the 2 links hardwired. Nigej (talk) 12:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:Delete. It might have been useful if used while creating the other templates, but since they are already using hardcoded links, and the links themselves should be stable, there isn't really a compelling argument to use this. Gonnym (talk) 15:33, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 February 6. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Dreadnought-class_submarine}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Musical techniques. ✗plicit 13:34, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Extended techniques}}

This is the second time this has been nominated after the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_September_30#Template:Extended_techniques last one] went unopposed before being closed. The main gist is that the contents of this template have been absorbed into the larger Template:Musical techniques. Why? I Ask (talk) 12:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Merge per nom. Clearly we don't need both. Content differs marginally but that's no big deal. I'm assuming that Extended techniques is a subset of Musical techniques so the name proposed {{tl|Musical techniques}} seems preferable and this one can merged then deleted. Nigej (talk) 12:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:02, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Voting in Alabama}}
• {{Tfd links|Voting in CA}}
• {{Tfd links|Voting in Wisconsin}}
• {{Tfd links|Voting in massachusetts}}

Sidebars containing mostly external links. However WP:SIDEBAR specficially says "external links should not be included in navigation templates." I know we're trying to provide a public service but this is not the way. A sidebar is ... "a grouping of links used in multiple related articles to facilitate navigation between those articles in Wikipedia". These are nothing like that. Nigej (talk) 11:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:Yeah, I agree with nom here. These sidebar templates aren't navigation templates and their external link usage seems very out of place. Unless a compelling argument is made, I'm leaning delete here. Gonnym (talk) 23:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

::and the use of "plainlinks" to hide the fact that they're external links is particularly poor IMO Nigej (talk) 16:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

:::Didn't even notice that! Gonnym (talk) 15:30, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

• Delete More external links than internal links to article on Wikipedia. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:24, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:08, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Wawel map}}

Unused clickable map, mostly red links. Following a WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT in 2020 the article where it was used Wawel now redirects to Wawel Castle. It either needs using or deleting, leaving it lying around in the ether is no use to anyone. Nigej (talk) 08:33, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Very easy to fix (I've added it to Wawel). Seems useful and I am sure we can find many places to use it, no idea why it was depreciated. Someone(s) put a lot of work into making it, with clickable links and everything. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|World Artistic Gymnastics Championships medal table}}

Unused medal header. Used to be used at articles like 2011 World Artistic Gymnastics Championships – Women's vault but all such articles have been WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT to the parent articles and this template is no longer of use. Nigej (talk) 08:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:Delete per nom. Also design-wise it isn't built with modern usage so would need to be rebuilt anyways. Gonnym (talk) 15:28, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|AWG Volleyball}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Table tennis}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Snowshoeing}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Snowshoe biathlon}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Snowboarding}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Short track speed skating}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Arctic sports}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Alpine skiing}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Badminton}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Basketball}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Biathlon}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Curling}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Dene games}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Dog mushing}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Figure skating}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Gymnastics}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Indoor soccer}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Futsal}}
• {{Tfd links|AWG Ice hockey}}

All unused; all red links now that link here. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Comment I have taken the liberty of combining these related items into one list. Nigej (talk) 07:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
• Delete The only realistic conclusion now that all the content has been deleted. Nigej (talk) 07:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
• Delete, none link anything. Cavalryman (talk) 08:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC).
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 20:24, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 20:28, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:53, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Events at the 2014 Arctic Winter Games}}

Unused; All links deleted via PROD. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:45, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and previous TfDs in this area. Nigej (talk) 07:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).