Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 October 19#Template:User Lombardy/cat

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Invalid parameters category}}

No transclusions, incoming links, categories, or documentation. An abandoned experiment? – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
• Ironically, you requested it be created back at the time. The context is Template talk:Infobox station/Archive 3#Parameter validation. Since we're here and I generally believe TfDs of unused templates should not be used to reopen old wounds, delete'. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Zen Lineage Mel Weitsman}}

Unused and is article content. Same list exists on the Mel Weitsman article. No need for this anymore. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:07, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Spport Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:50, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Tanduay Light Rhum Masters roster}}

Single-use. Substitute on mainspace article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Subst and delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Café France Bakers roster}}

Unused. Hasn't been updated since 2016. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|1920/21 Richmond dual premiership players}}
• {{Tfd links|1932/34 Richmond dual premiership players}}

Respective navboxes for each season already exist. Template:1920 Richmond premiership players, Template:1921 Richmond premiership players, Template:1932 Richmond premiership players, Template:1934 Richmond premiership players. Dual premiership is not a thing for any sport. Even if players win two ore more championships. More navboxes are not needed here. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete as dual premiership is not a real thing, and correct templates already exist. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|1973/74 Richmond dual premiership players}}

Navboxes for both teams championship exist with Template:1973 Richmond premiership players and Template:1974 Richmond premiership players. No need for another when two are already doing the job. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete as dual premiership is not a real thing, and correct templates already exist. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|1967/69 Richmond dual premiership players}}

Navboxes for the championship Richmond teams exists with Template:1967 Richmond premiership players and Template:1969 Richmond premiership players. No need for another. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete as dual premiership is not a real thing, and correct templates already exist. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|2017/19 Richmond dual premiership players}}
• {{Tfd links|2017/19/20 Richmond triple premiership players}}

Thr 2017/2019 is unused and duplicates the entries already on Template:2017 Richmond premiership players, Template:2019 Richmond premiership players, and Template:2020 Richmond premiership players. Dual and triple premierships do not exist as a thing in Australian rules football. I think this navbox is trying to make one championship navbox for Richmond's three championship seasons for 2017, 2019, and 2020. But normally for championship teams, we use a single navbox for each season. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:46, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete Should be one navbox per premiership season. --SuperJew (talk) 05:05, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete as dual premiership is not a real thing, and correct templates already exist. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 October 26. ✗plicit 23:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|GridStart}}
• {{tfd links|GridColumn}}
• {{tfd links|GridEnd}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 October 27. ✗plicit 00:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Afghanistan_conflict_detailed_map|module=Module}}
• {{tfd links|Afghanistan_conflict_detailed_map}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group A}}
• {{Tfd links|2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group B}}
• {{Tfd links|2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group C}}
• {{Tfd links|2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group D}}
• {{Tfd links|2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group E}}
• {{Tfd links|2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group F}}
• {{Tfd links|2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group G}}
• {{Tfd links|2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group H}}
• {{Tfd links|2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group I}}
• {{Tfd links|2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group J}}
• {{Tfd links|2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group K}}

No transclusions. It appears that the relevant article(s) have been [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2014%E2%80%9315_Champions_Hockey_League&type=revision&diff=1114709225&oldid=1108707547 adjusted to transclude this article content] from another article instead of using templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:37, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
• delete per nom, WP:LST works here. Frietjes (talk) 23:19, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Inter-Provincial Twenty20 color}}

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links from discussions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:11, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete I imagine the intended use was to use the team colours from Inter-Provincial Cricket#Current teams, but that would probably be a pointless template anyway (as each team's associated colour is just one colour). Definitely delete, as no proper use case for this, and it appears to have no actual functionality. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:49, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|NS Stoptrein lines}}
• {{Tfd links|NS Stoptrein style}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/3300}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/4000}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/4100}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/4200}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/4300}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/4400}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/4600}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/4700}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/4800}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/4900}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/5000}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/5200}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/5400}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/5500}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/5600}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/5700}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/5800}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/6000}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/6100}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/6300}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/6400}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/6800}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/6900}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/7000}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/7400}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/7500}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/7600}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/7700}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/7900}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/8500}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/9500}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/9600}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/9700}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/9800}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/15400}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/16000}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/17900}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/19500}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein left/30700}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/3300}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/4000}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/4300}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/4400}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/4600}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/4700}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/4800}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/4900}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/5000}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/5200}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/5400}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/5500}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/5600}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/5700}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/5800}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/6000}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/6100}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/6300}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/6400}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/6800}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/6900}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/7000}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/7400}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/7500}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/7600}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/7700}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/7900}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/8500}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/9500}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/9600}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/9700}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/9800}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/15400}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/16000}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/19500}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/19800}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Stoptrein right/30700}}

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Nederlandse Spoorwegen Frietjes (talk) 19:10, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:37, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Markussep ^Talk 08:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|NS Sprinter color}}
• {{Tfd links|NS style}}
• {{Tfd links|Nederlandse Spoorwegen stations}}
• {{Tfd links|Nederlandse Spoorwegen style}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter left/5900}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter left/6600}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter left/6700}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter left/7100}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter left/7300}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter left/7700}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter left/7800}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter left/8100}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter left/8600}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter left/9000}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter left/14900}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter right/5900}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter right/6600}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter right/6700}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter right/6900}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter right/7300}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter right/7700}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter right/7800}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter right/8100}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter right/8900}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter right/9000}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/NS Sprinter right/14900}}

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Nederlandse Spoorwegen Frietjes (talk) 19:09, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:37, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|IRE lines}}
• {{Tfd links|IRE stations}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/IRE left/}}
• {{Tfd links|S-line/IRE right/}}

Train templates with no transclusions; replaced by :Module:Adjacent stations/DB Regio Baden-Württemberg and similar as part of the S-line migration project. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:37, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|User United States territory/cat}}

Shared documentation page that is no longer used, because {{cl|United States user categories}} and {{cl|United States territories user categories}} are container categories, and all of their subcategories use shared documentation pages that are unique to a state or territory. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:35, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|User za-0/doc}}
• {{Tfd links|User nl-4/doc}}
• {{Tfd links|User nl-1/doc}}
• {{Tfd links|User lt-1/doc}}

Not needed, since the parent template uses the standard shared documentation template, {{tl|User x}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:35, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --Iketsi (talk) 01:27, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Userstats}}

No transclusions after existing for eight months. The creator did not express an interest in keeping it around for development. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:34, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|User Lombardy/cat}}

Unused documentation template. The relevant categories that apparently hosted it have been deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:41, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:35, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|User currently listening to/doc/main}}

Unused subpage of a template documentation page. Created in 2012. Created as a test? – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:17, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|User attribute}}

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. Created in 2013. Presumably, some other template does the job that this one was created for. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|2022–23 ICC T20 World Cup East Asia-Pacific Qualifier}}

As per previous deletions, we now only use inline invoke sports table within cricket articles for most events other than things like the World Cup. See the other table used on the same article. The template for this regional qualification event is highly unlikely to be used any where other than this one article. Bs1jac (talk) 11:40, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete as only one valid use for this table. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:49, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:35, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|NFL staff footer}}

Per discussion at WT:SPORT - proposed deletion and replacement with List of current National Football League staffs. WP:NAVBOXes are designed for linking articles to other articles, not for linking an articles to many other templates as is the use in the template. There's no need for a navigation box half way through an article only for current leagues. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 07:10, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete and replace with a link to List of current National Football League staffs. The navbox has many issues. It actually provides navigation between templates, contrary to WP:NAVBOX which says "Navigation templates are a grouping of links used in multiple related articles to facilitate navigation between those articles in Wikipedia" (clicking on the BUF link at Arizona Cardinals#Current staff takes you to {{t|Buffalo Bills staff}} not the Buffalo Bills article) The navbox also uses unexplained abbreviations, see MOS:1STABBR. Also there's an article List of current National Football League staffs which makes this template redundant. Nigej (talk) 07:44, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
• :For people researching NFL staffs, especially specific staff positions, the template is useful. 174.29.71.31 (talk) 23:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete and replace with a link to List of current National Football League staffs. For all the reasons mentioned by Nigej above, this is an unnecessary template. I would also add that I'm not convinced why the templates it links to e.g. {{tl|Buffalo Bills staff}}, exist anyway, but that's a separate discussion. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:48, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

:* Changing my vote to "do not replace" as per below comment. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:50, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

• Delete and do not replace Navboxes are for navigation to other articles, not templates. Alternatively, if this is purely for the convenience of editors, hide it in mainspace transclusions. No need to replace, as each team article already transcludes Template:2022 NFL season by team, which links to the other team pages, which in turn will have their respective staff.—Bagumba (talk) 17:48, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete; as above. Note: there are many other similar templates in :Category:Sports footer templates. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 12:19, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).