Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 April 4#Template:Artists4Ceasefire

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Artists4Ceasefire}}

Bloated navbox with a tenuous relationship between the people listed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

• delete, over navboxing. Frietjes (talk) 19:44, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
• Delete. Per nominator. --woodensuperman 10:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Metanotice}}

Unused template, apparently an experiment, made by an editor who made a total of 61 edits in mid-March and then disappeared. No real documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

• delete Frietjes (talk) 19:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 April 15. (non-admin closure) Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 22:04, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

• {{tfd links|Family_Guy_(season_1)}}
• {{tfd links|Family_Guy_(season_2)}}
• {{tfd links|Family_Guy_(season_3)}}
• {{tfd links|Family_Guy_(season_4)}}
• {{tfd links|Family_Guy_(season_5)}}
• {{tfd links|Family_Guy_(season_6)}}
• {{tfd links|Family_Guy_(season_7)}}
• {{tfd links|Family_Guy_(season_8)}}
• {{tfd links|Family_Guy_(season_9)}}
• {{tfd links|Family_Guy_(season_10)}}
• {{tfd links|Family_Guy_(season_11)}}
• {{tfd links|Family_Guy_(season_12)}}
• {{tfd links|Family_Guy_(season_13)}}

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|NavigationNRWTrophyChampionsFigureSkatingLadies}}

Non-notable figure skating competition; similar templates for other disciplines (men's, pairs, dance) do not exist. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:44, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Yuga row}}
• {{Tfd links|Yuga block}}
• {{Tfd links|Yuga}}

Unused template without documentation. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose. I've added documentation to {{tlx|Yuga}} (fair cop), but the template is only unused because a particular user decided they didn't like the way it was built. There are a number of articles in the area of Hindu time and cosmology that rely on presenting tables of text as images (such as Manvantara), and I'm trying to come up with ways of presenting repeated (and cyclical) data in nice, formatted tables. PepperBeast (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
• Delete Three templates to generate one table for one page (Yuga cycle#Duration and structure) is over complicated and unnecessary. Far easier to add a table to the page. There is no added benefit of generating the table in this way. This was changed from an image and list to a templated table recently without discussion. It's now just a table. Jroberson108 (talk) 17:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
• :It's not just for one page. I'm finishing up some work on it so that it can do individual yugas, the entire chatur, and optionally add BCE/CE dates. PepperBeast (talk) 06:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
• ::So you want to replace existing wikitables with these templates that produce the same wikitables, but in a way more complicated manner? Jroberson108 (talk) 06:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

:::From an end-user standpoint, it's incredibly simple. PepperBeast (talk) 08:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

• delete, unnecessary complication to create a wikitable. Frietjes (talk) 19:42, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 22:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Alabama cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Arizona cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|California cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Colorado cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Connecticut cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Florida cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Georgia (U.S. state) cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Idaho cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Illinois cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Indiana cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Iowa cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Kansas cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Louisiana cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Massachusetts cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Michigan cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Minnesota cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Missouri cities and mayors of over 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Nevada cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|New Jersey cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|New Mexico cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|New York cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|North Carolina cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Ohio cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Oklahoma cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Oregon cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Pennsylvania cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|South Carolina cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Tennessee cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Texas cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Utah cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Virginia cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Washington cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}
• {{Tfd links|Wisconsin cities and mayors of 100,000 population}}

This seems a very arbitrary cutoff and strange inappropriate intersection for a series of navboxes. Some of these (California for example) seem more like article content masquerading as a navbox, others (Idaho) are barely navigating anythying. --woodensuperman 09:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

• Note: Prior discussion from 19 February 2013. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
• Note Also see --May 28, 2018 discussion. --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
• Note This isolated 2010 discussion was a deletion discussion about a template with 2 links which is irrelevant to this discussion.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
• Note This January 24, 2012 decision to delete when no such consensus existed and was overturned at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2012_February_27#Template:New_York_cities_and_mayors_of_100,000_population-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
• Keep I don't think much has changed since the 2018 discussion that resulted in a keep vote and the malformed 2012 discussion that was overturned. Although only 22 of the 76 mayors have links for California, it still remains useful as do smaller templates. It would be interesting to know if there is any clickthrough data from the state articles. Mayors by state and population is not a strange intersection. It is just a formalization of the Mayors by state with a formalized cutoff.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
• DELETE - near useless junk that isn't needed. Template:Mayors of US State Capitals needs to be deleted too. Maybe convert all of these into one list article. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 15:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
• Keep Not "very arbitrary" at all, for there are many lists here based on that figure. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 20:52, 4 April 2024 (UTC).

:*Keep I don't see any reason or convincing argument to delete this.

:Criticalthinker (talk) 06:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

• DELETE - It appears to offer nothing useful other than promoting mayors of large cities. It does not even appear to be kept up as many cities with 100,000+ are not even listed and the mayors are out of date. I agree with the assessment that it seems more like article content masquerading as a navbox.Myotus (talk) 14:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
• Delete. Better as categories, if anything. I can't think of a reason why I would need (or want) to navigate between mayor articles based on these criteria. Grk1011 (talk) 01:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Izno (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 17:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|Cite/doc}}

This template doc subpage became orphaned when the base template was turned into a redirect via consensus. Also note this orphaned template /doc page has its own talk page Template talk:Cite/doc which is also uselessly orphaned itself. —Uzume (talk) 02:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

• Keep Wrong venue and completely harmless and standard redirect. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

:The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

• {{Tfd links|WBC winning pitchers}}

WP:NENAN. There is nothing particularly special about winning the championship game of the World Baseball Classic that merits a navbox for it. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

• Delete per Muboshgu's reasoning.-- Yankees10 22:58, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

:The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.