Wikipedia:WikiProject Anti-war/Assessment#Importance scale

; How can I get my article rated? : Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

; Who can assess articles? : Anyone is free to add or change the rating of an article.

; What if I don't agree with a rating? : You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

; Aren't the ratings subjective? : Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page.

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{tl|WikiProject Anti-war}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Anti-war

|class=

|importance=

}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter, note capital letters are essential for proper categories!

• FA (adds articles to :Category:FA-Class Anti-war articles)
• A (adds articles to :Category:A-Class Anti-war articles)
• GA (adds articles to :Category:GA-Class Anti-war articles)
• B (adds articles to :Category:B-Class Anti-war articles)
• Start (adds articles to :Category:Start-Class Anti-war articles)
• Stub (adds articles to :Category:Stub-Class Anti-war articles)
• NA (for pages, such as templates or disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to :Category:Non-article Anti-war pages)

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in :Category:Unassessed Anti-war articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:

• Top (adds articles to :Category:Top-importance Anti-war articles)
• High (adds articles to :Category:High-importance Anti-war articles)
• Mid (adds articles to :Category:Mid-importance Anti-war articles)
• Low (adds articles to :Category:Low-importance Anti-war articles)

Articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in :Category:Unknown-importance Anti-war articles. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

{{clear}}

{{grading scheme}}

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to people reading the articles.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

• Campus Antiwar Network (just finished making a large revision to the article)
• Protest song (still needs more work on very early and international protest songs, but it's currently rated as stub, which is well off)
• Another Mother For Peace new, referenced article
• Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament - Has not received a rating on the importance scale.
• Chicago Seven - updated December, 2020

Assessment