Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/July 2021 Backlog Drive

• {{u|Enterprisey}} - coordination, bot operator

{{Graph:Chart

|type=line

|linewidth=2

|interpolate=monotone

|width=800

|height=280

|xAxisTitle=July 2021

|xAxisAngle=-45

|yAxisTitle=Number of pending submissions

|yGrid=

|xTitle=July 2021

|x= Thu 1,Fri 2,Sat 3,Sun 4,Mon 5,Tue 6,Wed 7,Thu 8,Fri 9,Sat 10,Sun 11,Mon 12,Tue 13,Wed 14,Thu 15,Fri 16,Sat 17,Sun 18,Mon 19,Tue 20,Wed 21,Thu 22,Fri 23,Sat 24,Sun 25,Mon 26,Tue 27,Wed 28,Thu 29,Fri 30,Sat 31,

|y1Title=Number of pending submissions

|y1= 4156,4125,4144,4000,3924,3724,3622,3323,3056,2839,2677,2568,2390,2273,2062,1968,1834,1651,1598,1492,1318,1125,935,709,556,471,397,247,153,122,26

}}

AFC review counts, July 1 through July 31 - does not include drafts that have since been deleted:

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/July 2021 Backlog Drive/Leaderboard}}

Scoring:

• Reviews get 1 point.
• Reviews of drafts that had been waiting more than 30 days instead get 1.5 points.
• Reviews that fail a re-review instead count as -1 point.
• Conducting a re-review gets 1 point.
• Bonus of 3 points for improving a draft that would have clearly been declined and then accepting it. (You must manually list these in a "Bonus" level-2 section.)

Re-reviews:

• For any disagreements, go to the backlog drive talk page.
• It is recommended that each participant have had at least 10% of their reviews (or 3 reviews, whichever is more) re-reviewed.
• It is recommended that each participant have conducted a number of re-reviews greater than 10% of their number of reviews.

The leaderboards and review logs are generated using the code at https://git.sr.ht/~enterprisey/enwp-afc-backlog-drive/tree.

The project will give out awards after this drive ends, and perhaps after some additional quality checks are done.

File:Team Barnstar Hires.png

To ensure quality, users should re-review other user's reviews. Any user may re-review any other user's reviews if they wish.

Review logs are subpages of the Participants page. To re-review a review, respond to the review like you would on a talk page, writing Pass or Fail with an optional comment, and then sign. For example, if a review looked like this in the code:

# D (corp) Draft:Example (300 days)

And you decided to pass it, you would write:

# D (corp) Draft:Example (300 days)

1. :Pass. [Optional comment goes here.] ~~~~

Explanation of the format used on the page: A, D, R for accept, decline, reject, with the reason codes (for example, "nn" for WP:GNG, full list) for declines/rejects in parentheses, then a link to the diff of the review labelled with the current title, then the number of days that the draft waited for a review. (We use that for bonus calculation.)

Moreover, you can write Invalid if the bot made a mistake - for example, counting the same review twice, which can happen if, say, the script edit-conflicted with itself - or Comment to leave a comment.

Re-reviews are tracked at a dedicated leaderboard. If you do 25 or more re-reviews, you get the Teamwork Barnstar.

You can also track bonuses manually, if you want: at the bottom of your own page, create a "Bonus" level-2 section and list the drafts that would've been a decline, and that you improved until they could be accepted. (More bonuses to be added later?)

If you know anyone who may want to help, put this template on their talk page: {{tls|WPAFCDrive}}, which will produce this.

2021-07