Login
Login

Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Global Names Index/A

{{Template:Project missing articles}}

Follow the instructions as based on Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Global Names Index. Once an article on a genus is created, remove all the additional naming and species that do not have enough info at the "species" section (granted that the species are written in the genus page and wikilinked). If you have any concerns, please write them on the talk page of the main page for greater visibility. Any troubled/difficult names that could be potential errors are to be placed at the SFNI list.

AAA-ABE

Species

SFNI

  • Articles that no info can be found about.
  • Aaabat -- {{Search species|Aaabat}} - Made comment to talk page (Vesper bat)
  • Aaba -- {{Search species|Aaba}} (de Laubenfels 1936) - Made comment to talk page (Sponges)
  • Aaceles undulatipes -- {{Search species|Aaceles+undulatipes}} (Redt.) (Pressumably redirect to Aceles undulatipes if following two other species trends.
  • Aachenia -- {{Search species|Aachenia}} (E. Knobloch 1973) - An extinct genus from the gymnosperms. All I managed to find was this: [http://www.ubio.org/browser/details.php?namebankID=4868749], [http://www.ubio.org/browser/details.php?namebankID=4868750] then these two journals: [http://www.conference.cz/eppc2006/final_programme.pdf] and [http://www.sgcity.org/dinotrax/pdf/11_TidwellAsh.pdf] which then link to this journal published by E.Knobloch in 1973: Knobloch, E.A., 1972, Aachenia debeyi n. gen., n. sp. – eine neue Konifere aus dem Senon von Aachen: Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte, v. 1972, p. 400-406. - Which is in a different language and is impossible to find on the net. Leave at SFNI for now until journal can be accessed. Species mentioned is Aachenia debeyi.
  • Aachenipollis -- {{Search species|Aachenipollis}} (W. Krutzsch 1971) - Species seems to be only Aachmipollis aachenensis [http://pdfserve.informaworld.com/485265__914367635.pdf],. More info is given here but need to subscribe to access: [http://www.paldat.org/index.php?page=search&mode=results_f&nr=1&ID=51]. This confused me: [http://www.gns.cri.nz/what/earthhist/fossils/spore_pollen/catalog/taxa/647.htm]. Apparently it is a cellular life: [http://www.ubio.org/browser/details.php?namebankID=4928254] but seems to be hard to put it in a group. Need to access original publication by W.Krutzsch from 1971.
  • Aacntholyda modesta -- {{Search species|Aacntholyda+modesta+MacGillivray+1923}} MacGillivray 1923. Only info given is here: [http://www.organismnames.com/details.htm?lsid=4305372]. Possibly a misspelling of Acantholyda but specific species known as Acantholyda modesta is under a different family according to this: [http://www.organismnames.com/details.htm?lsid=2719816]. Other info found here: [http://www.archive.org/stream/hymenopteraofame00krom/hymenopteraofame00krom_djvu.txt] and [http://www.archive.org/stream/bulletin3219791981illi/bulletin3219791981illi_djvu.txt]. If under the same family, it would have been a case of redirect one species synonym to another.
  • Aacolaimus mediterraneus -- {{Search species|Aacolaimus+mediterraneus}} Brunetti B 1949 Contribute alla conoscenza dei nematodi del M. Tirreno. ii. Alcune specie appartonenti alle famiglie: Enoplidae, Cyatholaimidae, Chromodoridae, Axonolaimidae. Monitore Zoologico Italiano, 57 1949: pp. 41-59. [Zoological Record Volume 87]. Possibly a misspelling of Ascolaimus? According to this: [http://books.google.com/books?id=A1vaQTIc-FIC&pg=PA470&lpg=PA470&dq=Aacolaimus&source=bl&ots=pi8XGOGfKk&sig=rSFIJH_CqCBn_WX62iXrxMmmrx8&hl=en&ei=aN6hS6vGHJeXkQWqvdHNCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CCcQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=Aacolaimus&f=false] and [http://www.globalnames.org/name_strings?search_term=ascolaimus&commit=Search]
  • Aactinocyclus -- {{Search species|Aactinocyclus}} with the only species being: * Aactinocyclus pyrotechnicus -- {{Search species|Aactinocyclus+pyrotechnicus}} - Thought maybe it was a spelling of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actinocyclus or of Actinocyclus_(diatom) but both of those are in a different kingdom from the one described here in the GNI (kingdom Protista)
  • Aades aegypti -- {{Search species|Aades+aegypti}} Misspelling of Aedes aegypti (Perhaps deserves redirect?)
  • Aaeylia abstracta -- {{Search species|Aaeylia+abstracta}} - A moth from Burma?
  • Aaera
  • Acera (genus) - Redirect this and above to Akera?
  • Aaeylia bucephalina -- {{Search species|Aaeylia+bucephalina}} (Was not able to find anything about Aaeylia either}.
  • Aage -- {{Search species|Aage}} - Apparently a phylum, with the only class being Holtimmen with the only genus being Pilularia (there is a fungus and plant genus of the same name in a different class) and there is even a Pilularia globulifera under the plant genus. Aage might be a typo of some sort?
  • Aaglapcrinus -- {{Search species|Aaglapcrinus}} Webster 1981 - A typo of Aaglaocrinus most likely.
  • Aahithis -- {{Search species|Aahithis}} Schallreuter 1988 - A fossil? Google lead me to this: [http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=et&u=http://www.polvamaa.ee/public/files/magistritoo.doc&ei=CvquS5nsBc-HkQXn5OWpDQ&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CBEQ7gEwAg&prev=/search%3Fq%3DAahithis%26hl%3Den], [http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.uni-greifswald.de/~geo/Schallreuter/seiten/publikationen.html&ei=CvquS5nsBc-HkQXn5OWpDQ&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CB4Q7gEwBQ&prev=/search%3Fq%3DAahithis%26hl%3Den] and [http://www.gi.ee/7bsc/7BSC_book_web_small.pdf] with one species being mentioned (Aahithis varia)
  • Aaida (A.) cossyphoides Antoine 1949 -- {{Search species|Aaida+(A.)+cossyphoides+Antoine+1949}} - Meant to be Aaida cossyphoides, a genus of Aaida? Unable to find anything. Appears to not be the same as the genus Aida (genus). Quite possibly a genus synonym of Asida (genus). I think the (A.) is meant to be short for Asida.
  • Aaida (Granulasida) mater Espanol Coll 1951 -- {{Search species|Aaida+(Granulasida)+mater+Espanol+Coll+1951}} - Same as above. Is it meant to be Aaida mater or Aaida granulasida or it is a part of Granulasida? Are they a typo of Asida (genus)?
  • Aaio otus otus -- {{Search species|Aaio+otus+otus}} - Incorrect version of Asio otus otus. Redirect if deemed necessary once subspecies is created.
  • Aal -- {{Search species|Aal}} - Apparrently a class in the "Kai" phylym with the only species in the class being Pilularia globulifera which is contrary to what most of the other sources say about that genus/species. Quite an odd error/typo IMHO.