Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20080709
class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="width:95%; text-align: left; border: #ababab 2px; margin-top: 0.2em;" |
style="background-color: #EFEFEF; border: 2px #ababab solid; text-align: center;" |The Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games Newsletter |
---|
style="border: 2px #ababab solid;"|
{| class="plainlinks" | colspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;width: 50%; border: 2px #ababab solid; background-color: #EFEFEF; padding: 1em;" | {| style="width: 100%; border: 0px; background-color:#EFEFEF;" | style="vertical-align:middle;width: 55%; border: 0px; background-color:#EFEFEF; padding: 1em" | The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter | style="vertical-align:middle;text-align:right;width: 45%; border: 0px; background-color:#EFEFEF; padding: 1em;" | |
|-
| style="vertical-align:top;border: 2px #ababab solid; padding: 1em; width: 47%; background-color:#EFEFEF;" |
;Project At a Glance
As of 2008-07-08, the project has:
{{Col-begin}}
{{Col-2}}
- 90 Featured articles
- 16 Featured Lists
- 9 Featured Topics
- 1 articles in Featured Article Review
{{Col-2}}
- 231 Good Articles
- 1 articles in Good Article Review
- 16 articles for Peer review
{{Col-end}}
;Changes to Featured and Good articles, lists, and topics:
{{Col-begin}}
{{Col-2}}
Promoted FA/FL:
Image:LinkFA-star.png Crackdown, Myst III: Exile, List of Sega 32X games, List on songs in Guitar Hero: Rocks the 80s, List of WWE SmackDown video game titles
Topic:
14px Video game consoles (seventh generation)
Demoted FA/FL:
Demoted FT:
{{Col-2}}
Promoted GA:
14px Alleyway, Chrono Resurrection, Club Penguin, Conan (2007 video game), Day of Defeat: Source, Final Fantasy VII (Famicom), King Arthur & the Knights of Justice (video game), Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time, Mario Power Tennis, Midtown Madness, Planetarian: Chiisana Hoshi no Yume, Pokémon Gold and Silver, Pokémon Red and Blue, Super Smash Bros., The World Ends with You, Victorious Boxers: Ippo's Road to Glory, WWE SmackDown (video game series), Ayu Tsukimiya, Music of the Final Fantasy Tactics series, Nobuo Uematsu, Halo: The Fall of Reach, Halo Original Soundtrack, Jack Thompson (attorney), Key (company), The Myst Reader
Demoted GA:
{{Col-end}}
;News
There were 236 new articles in June 2008
Current proposals and discussions
- Well, gee, thanks 1up!
1UP.com has recently changed their rating scale. A list of affected articles can be found here. See discussion for details. - About 32% of the articles on the list have been checked and updated.
- Inactive project cleanup
Proposal to consolidate inactive projects and taskforces. Project page can be found here. - Wikipedia:WikiProject Massively multiplayer online games redirected to WP:VG. See MfD.
- MU* taskforce moved to page under WP:VG. See new MU* task force page.
- Neopets and RuneScape taskforces deleted. See MfD.
- All talk pages moved to archives under WT:VG
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Dynasty Warriors deleted.
| style="vertical-align:top;border: 2px #ababab solid; padding: 1em; width: 45%; background-color: #EFEFEF;" |
;Feature: Writing the Reception
In many video game articles, the Reception section is the last main section of prose. As its name suggests, within the section you should summarize the critical reaction to the game. The section should provide a high-level overview of what the critics liked and didn’t like about the game; it is a summary, not a repetition of what publications thought. Therefore, don’t put in excessive, long winded quotes or have a paragraph detailing IGN’s thoughts on the game. To prevent cluttering of the prose with scores, reviews table such as {{tl|VG Reviews}} can be used to organize this kind of information.
A good way to lead off the section is a by-the-numbers or at a glance snapshot of the game’s reception; you can use aggregate scores to suggest an overall critical response to the game, and can provide sales figures (if you have them) for the game’s release. Commonly, the rest of the reception is broken into positive and negative paragraphs. Entirely separate ‘Praise’ and ‘Controversy’ or ‘Negative comments’ or the like are strongly discouraged as troll magnets. If the game has won any awards, then listing them at the bottom of the reception section is an option.
Other things to remember:
- Don’t list every single review in the reviews table; likewise, don’t mention every award the game has ever gotten.
- Generally, talk about what the reviewers say rather than speaking for them; for example, “Reviewer X of Publication Y took issue with elements of the game such as X, Y, and Z” instead of “Review X said that “I took issue with elements of the game such as X, Y, and Z.” If a reviewer has a good comment which sums up the positive/negative/overall reaction, or a particular sentiment common in many reviews, it might be more appropriate to use.
- If adding sales data, make sure to provide context; did it sell those 4.2 million units within three months of release or three years? If possible, break down the sales by region; did the Japanese like the game, but Americans not buy it?
- Use reviews whose scores are outliers from the average ratings to find key points that were liked or disliked about a game. If all reviews except for one average around a 9 out of 10, and the one is a 7 out of 10, there is probably some clear negative points to be found in it; the same works with very positive reviews.
- Perhaps most importantly, give proper weight and keep a neutral point of view. If the game received mostly negative scores, having three paragraphs on positive aspects and glossing over the bad parts in a sentence or two conveys the wrong impression to readers.
|-
|-
| colspan="2" style="vertical-align:top;border: 2px #ababab solid; padding: 1em; width: 55%; background-color: #EFEFEF;" |
;Things you can help with:
class="messagebox" style="width:100%"
| {{Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/to do}} |
;Project Navigation
;VG Project Main pages
;VG Project Departments
- Assessment – talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
;
|}
|}