Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Majorly
Majorly's edit stats using [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate?username=Majorly&site=en.wikipedia.org "wannabe Kate" tool] as of 01:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC):
User:Majorly
run at Sun Nov 4 00:58:32 2007 GMT
Category: 6
Image talk: 1
Image: 31
Mainspace 7726
MediaWiki talk: 3
MediaWiki: 16
Portal: 2
Talk: 938
Template talk: 120
Template: 268
User talk: 5656
User: 815
Wikipedia talk: 563
Wikipedia: 5187
avg edits per page 2.56
earliest 14:44, 9 June 2006
number of unique pages 8321
total 21332
2006/6 30
2006/7 471
2006/8 2304
2006/9 2826
2006/10 3025
2006/11 1821
2006/12 755
2007/1 1093
2007/2 2133
2007/3 2032
2007/4 1455
2007/5 1136
2007/6 629
2007/7 262
2007/8 466
2007/9 369
2007/10 469
2007/11 56
Mainspace
323 List of English monarchs
188 List of Big Brother 2006 housemates (UK)
185 Big Brother 2006 (UK)
150 Big Brother (UK)
63 Cheadle Hulme
59 Colleen McCabe
58 Cheadle Hulme High School
51 Henry VIII of England
50 Big Brother 2006 nominations table (UK)
44 Celebrity Big Brother 2007 (UK)
41 Live & Kicking
38 Halloween
38 Leonardo da Vinci
35 England
31 Wikipedia
Talk:
74 Main Page
64 Big Brother 2006 nominations table (UK)
53 List of Big Brother 2006 housemates (UK)
48 Big Brother 2006 (UK)
36 Big Brother (UK)
30 List of English monarchs
15 Millwall brick
10 Big Brother 2007 (UK)
10 Wikipedia
9 Monifieth High School
9 Pluto
8 Stingray
7 2006 Ipswich murder investigation
6 Big Brother 2006 nominations table (UK)/Archive
6 Marco Polo
Image:
5 Colleen Mccabe.jpg
4 Fluidized Bed Reactor Graphic.jpg
4 Federalperiodamsofa.jpg
3 Teenageopera.jpg
2 Ottoman.1683.png
2 Rodent52copy.jpg
MediaWiki:
8 Watchdetails
2 Signupend
2 Protect-text
2 Common.js
MediaWiki talk:
3 Watchdetails
Template:
71 Did you know/Next update
30 Did you know
20 RfA
19 RfA talk
9 Big Brother UK sidebar
7 RfB
4 Arbitration Committee Elections statement
2 Spoiler-season
2 Meetup
2 PRChina-geo-stub
2 Sonic games
2 Non-free logo
2 Metal Gear series
2 Hpw
2 RfA Navigation
Template talk:
79 Did you know
24 RfA
4 Test5-n
4 RfB
3 Spoiler-season
2 Big Brother UK sidebar
User:
141 Majorly
108 Majorly/monobook.js
61 Majorly/Sandbox
61 Majorly/Articles created
28 Majorly/Nice things
27 Majorly/Removed stuff
24 Majorly/RfA
16 NawlinWiki
14 Majorly/Footer
13 FisherQueen
12 Essjay/RFC
11 Majorly/Header
8 American Brit
7 Majorly/OrphanBot
6 Will Beback
User talk:
1034 Majorly
37 Majorly/Archives
36 Majorly/Header
22 Ryan Postlethwaite
22 Xy7
21 TharkunColl
20 The Haunted Angel
17 Essjay
17 American Brit
15 Omicronpersei8
14 Majorly/Removed stuff
14 Taxman
13 Nishkid64
13 FisherQueen
13 A.Z.
Wikipedia:
777 Requests for page protection
391 Administrator intervention against vandalism
129 Requests for adminship/RfA stats
78 Requests for adminship
75 Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
61 Articles for creation/2006-09-01
53 Articles for creation/2006-09-10
49 Bureaucrats' noticeboard
43 Requests for adminship/Alex9891
40 Requests for adminship/RfA stats/Stats
37 Sandbox
35 Articles for creation/2006-09-14
35 Administrators' noticeboard
34 Requests for bureaucratship/Majorly 2
33 Meetup/Birmingham 2
Wikipedia talk:
332 Requests for adminship
11 IRC channels/wikipedia-en-admins
9 WikiProject Big Brother
8 Bureaucrats
7 Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007
7 Requests for bureaucratship/Nihonjoe 2
5 Changing username
5 Successful adminship candidacies
4 Requests for adminship process
4 Successful bureaucratship candidacies
4 Introduction
4 Requests for adminship/Gracenotes
4 Requests for bureaucratship/Durin
3 Requests for adminship/Firefoxman 2
3 Sandbox
[[WP:SNOW]]?
What's the odds for a snow accept, unless the candidate wishes to try for 300 appro's? LessHeard vanU 00:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
:When Majorly left as an admin, he didn't believe he had the communites trust anymore - that's why we're having the RfA. Ryan Postlethwaite 01:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
::Given that, he probably wishes for the RfA to be run in its entirety. Nishkid64 (talk) 01:01, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
:::What Majorly believe(d)s and what I feel the community will (with perhaps a few fierce opposes) believe are likely to be two very different animals. F'instance, I don't always agree with M's decisions - but I didn't bother with reading any further than the nom; I approved because Wikipedia is better off having M as an admin than not. Of course, 30-2-0 or 300-13-0 there will always be criticism for the admin actions after the event.
:::However, if M needs the reassurance... (shrug) LessHeard vanU 01:12, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, that was me wrong... it should be noted that the final tally was 142/26/ - not that it matter. LessHeard vanU 13:50, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
A bot request
Hi. Can somebody please add the link below to the RfA? I can't do it,
presumably since this RfA was speedy deleted in the past and I can't handle that. Thanks!
- See Majorly's edit summary usage with [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~mathbot/cgi-bin/wp/rfa/edit_summary.cgi?user=Majorly&lang=en mathbot's tool]. For the edit count, see the talk page.
Mathbot 01:01, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Mathbot 01:01, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Previous RFA
Has been deleted.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Majorly] Why? Can it be undeleted, please. -- !! ?? 01:29, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
:There are only 2 deleted edits. One a month ago, beginning an RFA that was never completed by Majorly and one today by Ryan where I assume he screwed something up or had second thoughts, nothing substantial. Mr.Z-man 01:38, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
::To explain that, after Majorly gave up his tools, he was immediately nominated by someone else but didn't accept so it got deleted. I created a nom earlier today and screwed it up (didn't put the nom in the template) so deleted it and started over again (that's what you get for a hard day at work!) Ryan Postlethwaite 01:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
:::I suspect that User:!! was looking for the original prior RfA that actually passed. Actually, I can't quickly find it either. I believe there was a username change (that would explain why this RfA isn't "Majorly 2"), but someone should link to the original RfA per standard practice unless there is a privacy issue. Newyorkbrad 01:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
::::I don't know if there's a privacy issue, but the previous RfA can be found on this page, if you look carefully enough! I'm fairly sure that there isn't an issue, since I seem to recall Majorly providing the link to someone in an WT:RFA discussion some time ago who was wondering where M's RfA page was. BencherliteTalk 02:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Alex9891 - There isn't a privacy issue, his rename could be found through several different logs. — H2O — 02:08, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
:Thanks. That is what I was after. (Didn't realise there was a rename involved.) -- !! ?? 10:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Opposing as "pat-on-back" excercise
Opposing this RfA as an attempt by Majorly to get praise strikes me as an unwarranted assumption of bad faith. I see no reason we ought not to believe him about his intentions. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 22:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)