civil liberties in the United States

{{short description|Unalienable rights}}

Civil liberties in the United States are certain unalienable rights retained by (as opposed to privileges granted to) those in the United States, under the Constitution of the United States, as interpreted and clarified by the Supreme Court of the United States and lower federal courts.{{Cite web |title=Rights of Immigrants |url=https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/about/initiatives/civil-rights-civics-institute/rights-immigrants/ |url-status=live |archive-url= |archive-date= |access-date=2025-01-28 |website=American Bar Association}} Civil liberties are simply defined as individual legal and constitutional protections from entities more powerful than an individual, for example, parts of the government, other individuals, or corporations. The explicitly defined liberties make up the Bill of Rights, including freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, and the right to privacy.{{Cite web |url=http://public.findlaw.com/civil-rights/civil-rights-basics/civil-rights-vs-liberties.html |title=Civil Rights vs. Civil Liberties |access-date=2011-03-22 |archive-date=2012-03-07 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120307174435/http://public.findlaw.com/civil-rights/civil-rights-basics/civil-rights-vs-liberties.html |url-status=live }} There are also many liberties of people not defined in the Constitution, as stated in the Ninth Amendment: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

The extent of civil liberties and the percentage of the population of the United States who had access to these liberties has expanded over time. For example, the Constitution did not originally define who was eligible to vote, allowing each state to determine who was eligible. In the early history of the U.S., most states allowed only white male adult property owners to vote (about 6% of the population).{{cite web |title=Expansion of Rights and Liberties - The Right of Suffrage |url=https://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/charters_of_freedom_13.html |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20160706144856/http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/charters_of_freedom_13.html |archivedate=July 6, 2016 |accessdate=April 21, 2015 |website=Online Exhibit: The Charters of Freedom |publisher=National Archives}}{{cite book|last1=Murrin|first1=John M.|last2=Johnson|first2=Paul E.|last3=McPherson|first3=James M.|last4=Fahs|first4=Alice|last5=Gerstle|first5=Gary|title=Liberty, Equality, Power: A History of the American People|date=2012|publisher=Wadsworth, Cengage Learning|isbn=9780495904991|page=296|edition=6th|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FGSQOiy6uZUC&pg=PT337|access-date=2017-08-25|archive-date=2023-01-20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230120193627/https://books.google.com/books?id=FGSQOiy6uZUC&pg=PT337|url-status=live}}{{cite book|first1=Kenneth|last1=Janda|first2=Jeffrey M.|last2=Berry|first3=Jerry|last3=Goldman|title=The challenge of democracy: government in America|date=2008|publisher=Houghton Mifflin|isbn=9780618990948|page=[https://archive.org/details/challengeofdemoc0009jand/page/207 207]|edition=9. ed., update|url=https://archive.org/details/challengeofdemoc0009jand|url-access=registration}} The 'Three-Fifths Compromise' allowed the southern slaveholders to consolidate power and maintain slavery in America for eighty years after the ratification of the Constitution."We Hold These Truths to be Self-evident;" An Interdisciplinary Analysis of the Roots of Racism & slavery in America Kenneth N. Addison; Introduction P. xxii And the Bill of Rights had little impact on judgements by the courts for the first 130 years after ratification.{{cite web|title=The Bill Of Rights: A Brief History|url=https://www.aclu.org/bill-rights-brief-history|publisher=ACLU|accessdate=21 April 2015|archive-date=30 August 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160830084804/https://www.aclu.org/bill-rights-brief-history|url-status=live}}

United States Constitution

=Freedom of religion=

{{Main|Freedom of religion in the United States}}

{{Main|Free Exercise Clause}}

The text of Amendment I to the United States Constitution, ratified December 15, 1791, states that:

{{blockquote|text="Congress shall make no law... prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"|source=United States Constitution, Amendment I}}

=Freedom of expression=

{{Main|Freedom of speech in the United States}}

==Free Speech Clause==

{{Main|Free Speech Clause}}

The text of Amendment I to the United States Constitution, ratified December 15, 1791, states that:

{{blockquote|text="Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech,"|source=United States Constitution, Amendment I}}

==Free Press Clause==

The text of Amendment I to the United States Constitution, ratified December 15, 1791, states that:

{{blockquote|text="Congress shall make no law... abridging... the press,"|source=United States Constitution, Amendment I}}

==Free Assembly Clause==

The text of Amendment I to the United States Constitution, ratified December 15, 1791, states that:

{{blockquote|text="Congress shall make no law... abridging... the right of the people peaceably to assemble,"|source=United States Constitution, Amendment I}}

==Petition Clause==

{{Main|Petition Clause}}

The text of Amendment I to the United States Constitution, ratified December 15, 1791, states that:

{{blockquote|text="Congress shall make no law... abridging... the right of the people... to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."|source=United States Constitution, Amendment I}}

==Free speech exceptions==

{{Main|United States free speech exceptions}}

The following types of speech are not protected constitutionally: defamation or false statements, child pornography, obscenity, damaging the national security interests, verbal acts, and fighting words. Because these categories fall outside of the First Amendment privileges, the courts can legally restrict or criminalize any expressive act within them. Other expressions, including threat of bodily harm or publicizing illegal activity, may also be ruled illegal.{{Cite web |url=http://www.firstamendment.com/firstamendment.php |title=Basic Information About the First Amendment & Censorship |access-date=2011-02-17 |archive-date=2012-05-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120501080409/http://www.firstamendment.com/firstamendment.php |url-status=live }}

=Right to keep and bear arms=

{{Main|Right to keep and bear arms in the United States}}

The text of Amendment II to the United States Constitution, ratified December 15, 1791, states that:

{{blockquote|text="A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."|source=United States Constitution, Amendment II}}

=Sexual freedom=

The concept of sexual freedom includes a broad range of different rights that are not mentioned in the U.S. Constitution. The idea of sexual freedom has sprung more from the popular opinion of society in more recent years, and has had very little Constitutional backing. The following liberties are included under sexual freedom: sexual expression, sexual choices, sexual education, reproductive justice, and sexual health.{{Cite web |date=2010 |title=State of Sexual Freedom in the United States, 2010 Report |url=http://www.glaa.org/archive/2010/woodhullreport1019.pdf |publisher=Woodhull Freedom Foundation |access-date=2017-02-03 |archive-date=2019-04-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190412131405/http://www.glaa.org/archive/2010/woodhullreport1019.pdf |url-status=live }} Sexual freedom in general is considered an implied procedure, and is not mentioned in the Constitution.

Sexual freedoms include the freedom to have consensual sex with whomever a person chooses, at any time, for any reason, provided the person is of the age of majority. Marriage is not required, nor are there any requirements as to the gender or number of people you have sex with. Sexual freedom includes the freedom to have private consensual homosexual sex (Lawrence v. Texas).

=Equal protection=

{{Main|Equal Protection Clause}}

Equal protection prevents the government from creating laws that are discriminatory in application or effect.

=Right to vote=

The text of Amendment XIV to the United States Constitution, ratified July 9, 1868, states that:

{{blockquote|text="when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the {{strikethrough|male}} inhabitants of such State, being {{strikethrough|twenty-one}} (eighteen) years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such {{strikethrough|male}} citizens shall bear to the whole number of {{strikethrough|male}} citizens {{strikethrough|twenty-one}} (eighteen) years of age in such State."{{Cite web |url=http://constitutionus.com/ |title=United States Constitution |access-date=2017-04-17 |archive-date=2021-04-22 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210422035937/https://constitutionus.com/ |url-status=live }}|source=United States Constitution, Article XIV}}

The text of Amendment XV to the United States Constitution, ratified February 3, 1870, states that:

{{blockquote|text="The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude."|source=United States Constitution, Article XV}}

The text of Amendment XIX to the United States Constitution, ratified August 18, 1919, states that:

{{blockquote|text="The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex."|source=United States Constitution, Amendment XIX}}

The text of Amendment XXIV to the United States Constitution, ratified January 23, 1964, states that:

{{blockquote|text="The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax."|source=United States Constitution, Amendment XXIII}}

The text of Amendment XXVI to the United States Constitution, ratified July 1, 1971, states that:

{{blockquote|text="The right of citizens of the United States, who are 18 years of age or older, to vote, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age."|source=United States Constitution, Amendment XXVI}}

=Right to parent one's children=

The right to parent one's own children also includes the right for a parent to teach their children as they see fit, and not have others govern over what their children are taught.

=Right to privacy=

{{excerpt|Right to privacy#United States}}

=Right to marriage=

The 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in the case Loving v. Virginia found a fundamental right to marriage, regardless of race. The 2015 United States Supreme Court ruling in the case Obergefell v. Hodges found a fundamental right to marriage, regardless of gender.

=Rights of self-defense=

The right to self-defense is rooted in common law and has been incorporated into statutory law in all 50 states.{{Cite web |title=Self-Defense Law: Overview |url=https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-law-basics/self-defense-overview.html |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=Findlaw |language=en-US}} It serves as a legal justification for the use of force, including deadly force in some cases, when an individual reasonably believes they are in imminent danger of bodily harm or death.

The use of force in self-defense is generally considered justifiable for the protection of oneself. However, there are limitations on when and how this force can be applied. The law typically requires that the force used be proportional to the threat faced, and that the person claiming self-defense had a reasonable belief that they were in danger.

Historically, many jurisdictions required individuals to attempt to retreat from a dangerous situation before using force in self-defense. However, this requirement has been modified or eliminated in many states through the adoption of stand-your-ground laws.{{Cite web |title=States That Have Stand Your Ground Laws |url=https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-law-basics/states-that-have-stand-your-ground-laws.html |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=Findlaw |language=en-US}}

Self-defense laws can also vary significantly from state to state. For example, only 13 states maintain a strict duty to retreat before using deadly force in self-defense. Additionally, some states limit the application of stand your ground laws to certain locations, such as one's home or vehicle. The threshold for what constitutes a reasonable belief of imminent danger also differs between jurisdictions.{{Cite news |title=U.S. Self-Defense Law—'Harsh’ By International Standards? |url=https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/u-s-self-defense-law-harsh-by-international-standards |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20231021220138/https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/u-s-self-defense-law-harsh-by-international-standards |archive-date=2023-10-21 |access-date=2024-12-19 |language=en}}{{Cite web |title=The Effects of Stand-Your-Ground Laws |url=https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/stand-your-ground.html |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=www.rand.org |language=en}}

See also

References

{{Reflist}}

Further reading

{{Refbegin}}

  • Abbott, Lewis F. [https://www.amazon.com/Defending-Liberty-Business-political-legal-environment-ebook/dp/B07NS2X2VC/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Defending+Liberty+the+case+for+A+NEW+BILL+OF+RIGHTS&qid=1564312501&s=gateway&sr=8-1 Defending Liberty: The Case for a New Bill of Rights] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240520210749/https://www.amazon.com/Defending-Liberty-Business-political-legal-environment-ebook/dp/B07NS2X2VC/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Defending+Liberty+the+case+for+A+NEW+BILL+OF+RIGHTS&qid=1564312501&s=gateway&sr=8-1 |date=2024-05-20 }} ISR Publications 2019.
  • Alexander, Keith L. [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/07/AR2009080702997.html Lawsuit Seeks Right to Carry Concealed Weapons in the District] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161117232630/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/07/AR2009080702997.html |date=2016-11-17 }}. Www.washingtonpost.com. The Washington Post, 8 Aug. 2009. Web. 29 Sept. 2009.
  • [https://www.aclu.org/intlhumanrights/index.html American Civil Liberties Union] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091021230712/http://www.aclu.org/intlhumanrights/index.html |date=2009-10-21 }}. ACLU.org. n.d. Web. 27 Sept. 2009.
  • FindLaw. [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/ First Amendment - Religion and Expression] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110825081738/http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/ |date=2011-08-25 }}. FindLaw for Legal Professionals. FindLaw, 2009. Web. 29 Sept. 2009.
  • Gordon, Jesse. [http://www.ontheissues.org/askme/civil_liberties.htm Civil Liberties vs. Civil Rights] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190310004827/http://www.ontheissues.org/askme/civil_liberties.htm |date=2019-03-10 }}. OnTheIssues.org. Ed. Jesse Gordon. Jesse Gordon, 3 Aug. 2000. Web. 29 Sept. 2009.
  • Scalia, Antonin. [https://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007_07_290/ District of Columbia v. Heller] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150928001506/http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007_07_290/ |date=2015-09-28 }}. Oyez.org. The US Supreme Court Media, June 2008. Web. 29 Sept. 2009.

{{Refend}}

{{United States topics}}

Category:Rights

Category:United States constitutional law