name and shame

Naming and shaming is a common strategy to compel and deter changes in state and non-state behavior. It is a prevalent strategy when states engage in human rights abuses.{{Cite journal|last=Hafner-Burton|first=Emilie M.|date=2008|title=Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming the Human Rights Enforcement Problem|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-organization/article/abs/sticks-and-stones-naming-and-shaming-the-human-rights-enforcement-problem/39C386310B323A85E58F4E687CA5F7D9|journal=International Organization|language=en|volume=62|issue=4|pages=689–716|doi=10.1017/S0020818308080247|s2cid=154303864 |issn=1531-5088}}{{Cite journal|last=Ausderan|first=Jacob|date=2014|title=How naming and shaming affects human rights perceptions in the shamed country|url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0022343313510014|journal=Journal of Peace Research|volume=51|issue=1|pages=81–95|doi=10.1177/0022343313510014|s2cid=110256400 |issn=0022-3433}}{{Cite journal|last=Krain|first=Matthew|date=2012-09-01|title=J'accuse! Does Naming and Shaming Perpetrators Reduce the Severity of Genocides or Politicides?1|journal=International Studies Quarterly|volume=56|issue=3|pages=574–589|doi=10.1111/j.1468-2478.2012.00732.x|issn=0020-8833|doi-access=free}} It has also been used to compel improvements in environmental policies,{{Cite journal|last1=Eilstrup-Sangiovanni|first1=Mette|last2=Bondaroff|first2=Teale N. Phelps|date=2014-06-01|title=From Advocacy to Confrontation: Direct Enforcement by Environmental NGOs1|journal=International Studies Quarterly|volume=58|issue=2|pages=348–361|doi=10.1111/isqu.12132|issn=0020-8833|doi-access=free}}{{Cite journal|last1=Tingley|first1=Dustin|last2=Tomz|first2=Michael|date=2022|title=The Effects of Naming and Shaming on Public Support for Compliance with International Agreements: An Experimental Analysis of the Paris Agreement|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-organization/article/abs/effects-of-naming-and-shaming-on-public-support-for-compliance-with-international-agreements-an-experimental-analysis-of-the-paris-agreement/206D9592C64D815D5303C47AE0F545C6|journal=International Organization|volume=76 |issue=2 |pages=445–468 |language=en|doi=10.1017/S0020818321000394|s2cid=119092023 |issn=0020-8183}} stopping whaling being one such example.{{Cite journal|last=Kolmaš|first=Michal|date=2021-03-04|title=International pressure and Japanese withdrawal from the International Whaling Commission: when shaming fails|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2020.1799936|journal=Australian Journal of International Affairs|volume=75|issue=2|pages=197–216|doi=10.1080/10357718.2020.1799936|s2cid=225415299 |issn=1035-7718}}{{Cite journal|last=Kolmaš|first=Michal|date=2021-08-06|title=Why is Japan shamed for whaling more than Norway? International Society and its barbaric others|url=https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcab012|journal=International Relations of the Asia-Pacific|volume=22 |issue=2 |pages=267–296|doi=10.1093/irap/lcab012|issn=1470-482X}}

Naming offending individuals or businesses (with the implied objective of shaming them) is sometimes used as an instrument of public policy intended to promote compliance with legal obligations or with the duty to put right the damage caused by non-compliance.

Examples are:

• The UK government established a scheme in 2010 to "name businesses which have failed to pay the National Minimum Wage to their employees. The policy objective of the naming scheme is "to raise awareness of minimum wage enforcement and deter employers who would otherwise be tempted to break minimum wage law". According to a government policy statement, this practice has been adopted because "the government recognises that some employers are more likely to respond to the social and economic sanctions that may flow from details of their payment practices being made public, than from financial deterrents".Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, [https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/656568/nmw-enforcement-beis_-_policy_doc_-_full_vFINAL__3_.pdf National Minimum Wage Law: Enforcement], published November 2017, accessed 3 January 2019
• In December 2018, the UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy introduced a "naming scheme" to exert reputational pressure on employers who fail to pay Employment Tribunal awards,Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (2018), [https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/764756/Naming_guidance_final_.pdf Naming Scheme for Unpaid Employment Tribunal Awards], published 17 December 2018, accessed 28 December 2018 following publication of government research which found that 34% of employment tribunal awards in England and Wales and 46% in Scotland remained unpaid.Taylor, M. (2017), [https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/627671/good-work-taylor-review-modern-working-practices-rg.pdf Good Work: The Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices], page 62, accessed 28 December 2018
• In 2013, Citizens Advice recommended that the UK's Consumer Bill of Rights should be backed up by action by trading standards regulators to "name and shame" businesses that have failed to correct poor practices which affect consumers.BBC News, [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-22868820 Name firms that mistreat consumers says Citizens Advice], published 12 June 2013, accessed 3 January 2018
• From July 2008, the NSW Food Authority has a public list of businesses that have breached food safety regulations to give "consumers more information to make decisions about where they eat or buy food".NSW Food Authority, [https://www.foodauthority.nsw.gov.au/offences NSW Food Authority Name And Shame], accessed 26 February 2021

• Public humiliation
• Real-name reporting
• Mass media
• Humiliation
• Online shaming

{{reflist}}

Category:Reputation management

Category:Figures of speech

Category:Humiliation