user talk:Butros

Hi, I noticed {{#if:|you've been working on {{{art}}}|your contributions}} and thought you might be interested in joining WikiProject California.

Image:Flag of California.svgIf you are interested in California-related themes, you may want to check out the California Portal.
If you are interested in contributing more to California related articles you may want to join WikiProject California (signup here). TorriTorri^{(Talk to me!)} 05:09, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Image:Flag of California.svg

Welcome to WikiProject California!

I noticed you recently added yourself to our Participants' list, and I wanted to welcome you to our project. Our goal is to facilitate collaboration on California-related articles, and everyone is welcome to join. Here are some suggested activities:

• Discuss with other members at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject California
• Cleanup some of the articles listed for cleanup
• Have a look at the Article alerts

As a member it would be helpful if you would

• {{watch|Wikipedia:WikiProject California|Add the project page to your watchlist}}
• Add yourself to the participant category, either by adding a userbox, or by adding {{PAGENAME}} to your userpage.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, or feel free to ask me on

{{#if:

| my talk page

| my talk page

}}.

Again, welcome!  -Optigan13 (talk) 06:16, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

:Muchas gracias, my transit amigo. Spring break = Good transit articles! :D ~ Butros (talk) 10:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, I can't say for certain what would be needed for an A-class rating, as I'm not particularly familiar with the criteria, but I will say that the article certainly looks better, reads better and is better referenced that before. That said, I disagree with putting some of the section order moves you made. As almost all of "Future expansion" is about new lines, it should come after the section on lines, or maybe become a subsection of it. The notable accidents section should be towards the end, as it is less relevant to the railroad than the various physical characteristics such as rolling stock, etc. (though when Metrolink does have an incident they are doozies.) Finally, I'd switch the infobox so the logo is above the locomotive picture. As the article is about the railroad, not the model of locomotive it uses, it's branding should come first.

Overall, though, superb work. Where's a railroad barnstar when you need it?oknazevad (talk) 14:40, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

If he is failing to participate in discussions and is unilaterally reverting edits he could be blocked for making disruptive edits. I myself cannot make the block as I am an involved editor, but you can use the Wikipedia:Administrator's noticeboard since this is becoming an incident where it needs administrator attention. Please point the admins to the discussion page to show the following:

• The consensus was reached on the talk page
• The user continues to revert, despite the fact that he was invited to the discussion and did not participate
• WhisperToMe (talk) 00:30, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi, sorry if I messed the csd templates up - I patrol pages manually so must have made a typo (Also why I'm slow putting the warnings on their user page). I also wasnt sure whether its normal to have 2 csd templates on the one page, but though it'd be better to leave them both to give admins more info if someone tries to recreate the page. Cheers Clovis Sangrail (talk) 05:34, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

:No problem mate! Keep up the good work. Butros (talk) 05:36, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

There are four move discussion in progress, on Talk:Bunker Hill, Los Angeles, California, Talk:Harbor City, Los Angeles, California, Talk:Miracle Mile, Los Angeles, California and Talk:Van Nuys, Los Angeles, California; which you may be interested in. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you, Purplebackpack89 ^{(Notes Taken) (Locker)} 21:44, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Los Angeles which you may be interested in. It is a consolidated discussion related to neighborhood moves discussed at Talk:Bunker Hill, Los Angeles, California, Talk:Angelino Heights, Los Angeles, Talk:Warner Center, Los Angeles, and other places. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you, Purplebackpack89 ^{(Notes Taken) (Locker)} 17:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Jojhutton is continuing to remove portal links from San Diego and OC articles, even after I told him to stop... again: Check out the contributions list Special:Contributions/Jojhutton - I linked him to the WikiProject California discussion page to show him that we have a consensus now on both Greater LA and San Diego. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

:Looks like it's all been resolved...sorry, I was slow on the draw. Butros (talk) 19:46, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Check out the proposal I made at Template talk:Infobox officeholder#Height! Purplebackpack89 ^{(Notes Taken) (Locker)} 22:32, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Edhshawk.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:58, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.

You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:12, 30 October 2011 (UTC).

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

{{Template:50k Invite}}--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Metrolink (California), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Sportsguy17 (T • C) 03:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)