user talk:Wouterstomp

HI, it seems like you didn't like our changes in the cholera vaccines entry and reverted to your earlier entry? We are interested in informing public health officials about the potential use of cholera vaccines in large outbreaks such as in Haiti, Zimbabwe, etc. Many look first at wikipedia what is available and it may be helpful to provide more information and examples about previous mass cholera vaccination campaigns? Please let us know whether you want to collaborate on such an entry?

David A. Sack, M.D.

Professor, Department of International Health Johns Hopkins University

Bloomberg School of Public Health

615 N.Wolfe Street / E5537

Baltimore, Maryland 21205

443-287-8795 (office)

410-502-6733 (fax)

443-686-1651 (mobile)

dsack@jhsph.edu

Lorenz von Seidlein MD/PhD

menzies school of health research

John Mathews Building (Bldg 58)

PO Box 41096

Casuarina, NT 0810

Australia — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeliveringOralVaccineEffectively (talk • contribs) 02:03, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

: Hi, that was User:Jmh649, not me (he reverted it to an earlier version by me). --WS (talk) 09:19, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

::Thanks have replied. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 09:49, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

• FYI User_talk:Biosthmors#Monthly update of WPMED goals?, thanks! Lesion (talk) 18:30, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for visiting and rating this page. Would you like to tell me why this is Start class? The Referencing is comprehensive without being exhaustive.Jrfw51 (talk) 21:39, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi {{u|Wouterstomp}}, we haven't had much chance to communicate other than on the WikiMed talk page. You recently wrote how enjoyable it is to collaboratively edit - I completely agree! Some of my most enjoyable editing (and I believe better quality) was collaborating on lichen planus with {{u|Lesion}}. Your comment caused me to reflect a little while. I think we could try and implement a system using a tag or box placed on an article or its talk age, reading something like "User X invites other editors to collaboratively edit this article from 13-16th June 2013", with the tag or box automatically dated and tagged with the user's username.

Then for the next 3-5 days this could be placed on an "invitations for collaboration" list. Just a thought, but I think this'd be quite possible using the existing structure on Wiki, and will think about it the next few days, I would find Wikipedia much more enjoyable if there was more collaborative editing and this would be a nice way for editors to collaborate. The downside would be sudden, rapid influxes of editors demanding RfC, committee oversight, or strict adherence to MEDRS by existing editors. But I feel a little warning wherever it is listed that editing is in process and the invitation for collaboration is specifically for active participants rather than contributors to the talk page may help ameliorate this. Thoughts? LT910001 (talk) 12:06, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

: Hey, yes that sounds like a clever and easily adopted approach. However it does heavily rely on extra manual work, which I don't know if many people will actually do. What I was personally thinking of was some automatic (bot?) system, but one approach does not exclude the other. Will think it over a little more. --WS (talk) 21:17, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

{{User:LT910001/1|user=LT910001}}

: I had a little play-around. A template like this could be added to an article's page, with documentation something like this: :User:LT910001/2. Pages can then be viewed using the 'what links here', or posted manually once daily. LT910001 (talk) 01:14, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

:: Sounds good, but we should have a bot post them somewhere automatically (like how it works with peer reviews). --WS (talk) 13:34, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Interesting that you mention stubs. I've been thinking of reforming that rubric: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Education_noticeboard&oldid=580441275#Some_stubs_don.27t_need_expanding]. Maybe I should write an op-ed in the Signpost about it to describe my views. Best. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 13:45, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

: Yeah, completely agree with that, there are plenty of stubs that are good enough as they are. If it were for me, we would get rid of those stub templates completely and leave that status only for the assessments. I don't think many editors get converted through those. --WS (talk) 21:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

: Noticed this discussion when viewing the topic above. I agree with your opinions, I think the 'stub' template has had its day. cfr. the thousands of anatomy articles about tiny structures. LT910001 (talk) 01:04, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

::After some more discussion I rated an article that was kind of short but I thought fairly complete up to B-class. So maybe it was just my misinterpretation of the rubric. =) This wasn't a WP:MED article, for what it's worth. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 16:28, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I saw your comment on the WikiProject Medicine/Assessment talk page pasted below:

......

There's a new calculation being listed with the stats. Basically, it's 6 points (against) for every stub, and 5 for every start-class article within the project's scope. The goal is to get to zero (all featured/all the group's wikiwork is complete). This might be useful for tracking over time, but the lag in reassessment plus the growth in articles might result in significant work being recorded as losing ground. The average status might be more useful. WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:57, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

"Is this tracked over time anywhere? Just a single number as is shown now doesn't say much. Would be nice to have some automatically updated graphs on some of the assessment statistics (also motivating to keep them up-to-date). --WS (talk) 13:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC) "

I am also interested if the change in assessment over time is saved or shown anywhere. Have you had an answer to your question?

Thank you!

BrandonHidaka (talk) 19:12, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Brandon, for the wikiwork factor, no I haven't found an answer to this, let me know if you do. For the other assessment numbers, your best bet would be to manually extract numbers from the history of the assessment table (e.g. here for medicine). --WS (talk) 20:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello User:Wouterstomp; Your user page indicates a possible interest in medicial article reviews. My present thoughts are to nominate an FA review in medicine, do you have any possible interest? BillMoyers (talk) 15:11, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

: Hi,I am certainly interested in medical articles, but what article are you talking about, and what exactly is it you are asking me to do? --WS (talk) 23:17, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

::Hello User:Wouterstomp, Thanks for getting back. It is actually not a single page, and possibly 3 or four Wikipedia medical pages which I was referring to. They affect several of the wikipages in Psychology and Psychiatry following the New Edition of the major diagnostic manual, the DSM-5, for Psychiatry earlier this year. The issue is that the majority of the wikipages related to mental health are still in DSM-4 language and all of them require the DSM-5 transition edits to be listed-and-addressed to remain current with the new DSM-5 and not become obsolete. My thinking was to offer to do the technical side of these enumerations of needed DSM-5 transition edits by nominating the pages for a GA or and FA review, and having an administrator associated to make sure that the page management editors (often other Admins) are assured that editorial standards are addressed objectively according to established Wikipedia page review standards and policies. My prediction would be of needing about one week to set up each one of the related wikipages and then let page management for each of the individual wikipages deal with the GA/FA enumerated points objectively and responsibly. Does this sound of possible interest? (Here is a link for the new DSM-5 manual discussed above http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=dsm-5&rh=n%3A283155%2Ck%3Adsm-5&ajr=1.) BillMoyers (talk) 23:17, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Psoriasis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages IL-22, IL-23 and IL-17 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy/Quarterly updates/1}}

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Compression fracture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the new image on the Carpal Tunnel page. I did notice though that the Trapezoid and Trapezium bone labels are inverted. --Spalte (talk) 18:03, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

: You are right, hadn't noticed that yet. I have requested for someone to adapt the image at Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Illustration workshop. --WS (talk) 18:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

:: Corrected in the image now. --WS (talk) 18:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Recurrent laryngeal nerve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Struma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy/Quarterly updates/2}}

Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Anatomy by User:Mdann52, using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Descriptive Zoopraxography Athlete, Running Long Jump Animated 13.gif gives us an understanding of how and why things in the field of medicine happen. Together, let us jumpstart the project and get it going. Our energy is all it needs.]]

Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.

• Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
• You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with {{WikiProject Physiology|class=|importance=}} with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
• You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
• We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
• Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
• Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
• To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
• {{tlsx|WP Physiology–invite}} ~~~~
• To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
• {{tlsx|WP Physiology–welcome}} ~~~~
• You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.

Hoping for your cooperation! Diptanshu^Talk 12:18, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=620682740 your edit] to Cardiac resynchronization therapy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Cardiac resynchronization therapy|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].

:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• capable of delivering electrical shocks for dangerously fast abnormal ventricular rhythms {{red|(}}see separate knol on Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICDs).

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:05, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, in reference to your previous note, could you please look at this issue https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Repeating_copyright_violations? Thank you. DocumentError (talk) 21:49, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy/Quarterly updates/3}}

Hi, you have commented at this. I think as of now all the points on all the reviews are responded to, and either settled or awaiting a response from the reviewer (mostly the former), so you may want to revisit it. I'm sorry some of you have had to wait a while for this. There has been a lot of activity, both on this page and on the article itself, as well as the holidays. It's been great to see so many people getting involved in this. Many thanks to you and all reviewers and editors! Wiki CRUK John (talk) 15:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy/Quarterly updates/4}}

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Tingling has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

:Article on the Dingling people already exists. This article sitting at a misspelling is totally unsourced and contains no salvageable material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Darx9url (talk) 14:41, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for writing the article on Branchial cleft cysts, it was the first thing I read when my son was diagnosed with a first branchial cleft cyst. We originally scheduled a surgery to remove it, but found out by word of mouth that several doctors in the US now use sclerotherapy to treat it. Other than avoiding the risk of surgery (especially around the facial nerve), there also seems to be no recurrence. It took only 1 single injection of ethanolamine to completely get rid of the cyst.

I wanted to edit the treatment section of your article to reflect these new treatment option, as I was unable to find out about this new treatment despite weeks of looking for information on the internet. However, I am a little overwhelmed by the rules of Wikipedia etc. Can you help me or make the edit yourself? Here are the studies I was going to quote Percutaneous treatment of lymphatic malformations [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19643255], Sclerotherapy of branchial cleft cysts using OK-432[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19716008] and Quantitative volumetric analysis of head and neck venous and lymphatic malformations to assess response to percutaneous sclerotherapy [http://acr.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/03/17/0284185115575779.abstract].

The second article specifically mentions a branchial cleft cyst. The "Quantitative volumetric analysis..." was done by Dr. Huy Do, my son's doctor and while it doesn't mention branchial cleft cysts specifically (they are too rare, I guess) I can prove to you that it worked on my son's first branchial cleft cyst. Is it ok to quote all of them or which ones? Do they have to mention branchial cleft cysts to be able to stand as a reference? The various doctors (including Dr. Murakami, a colleague of Dr. Shiels at the Nationwide Children's Hospital, second article) I talked to didn't seem to think that the type of cyst made much a difference - the reason branchial cleft cysts are not mentioned is that they come along so rarely.

Also, I noticed the request for photos on the talk page. I have photos of my son's cysts as well as an MRI of it. Would you want me to upload these or email them to you?

It looks like from your talk page that you are very busy, so if you don't have time to help, I'll make the edit myself, just wanted to check with you first because my main goal is not becoming an editor but to have this new information posted so that other parents/patients are able to find out that there's another option than surgery. Thanks for any help you can give me. --Turtletrip (talk) 19:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Athelia (disease) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

:Dictionary article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 14:41, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

: Thanks, happy holidays to you too! --WS (talk) 11:41, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

: Thanks, happy holidays to you too! --WS (talk) 13:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

I was wondering if you could look at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine the first two edit numbers are very incorrect on the hot articles list, thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 10:44, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

: Strange, no idea where that comes from. I have left a message at User talk:Kaldari who operates the bot updating those numbers. --WS (talk) 11:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

::thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:08, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has fixed many bugs. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving support for Japanese, Korean, Arabic, Indic, and Han scripts, and improving the single edit tab interface.

You can switch from the wikitext editor to the visual editor after you start editing. This function is available to nearly all editors at most wikis except the Wiktionaries and Wikisources.

Many local feedback pages for the visual editor have been redirected to :mw:VisualEditor/Feedback.

You can now re-arrange columns and rows in tables, as well as copying a row, column or any other selection of cells and pasting it in a new location.

The formula editor has two options: you can choose "Quick edit" to see and change only the LaTeX code, or "Edit" to use the full tool. The full tool offers immediate preview and an extensive list of symbols.

The single edit tab project will combine the "{{int:vector-view-edit}}" and "{{int:visualeditor-ca-editsource}}" tabs into a single "{{int:vector-view-edit}}" tab. This is similar to the system already used on the mobile website. (T102398) Initially, the "{{int:vector-view-edit}}" tab will open whichever editing environment you used last time. Your last editing choice will be stored as an account preference for logged-in editors, and as a cookie for logged-out users. Logged-in editors will have these options in the {{int:prefs-editing}} tab of Special:Preferences:

• {{int:visualeditor-preference-tabs-remember-last}},
• {{int:visualeditor-preference-tabs-prefer-ve}},
• {{int:visualeditor-preference-tabs-prefer-wt}}, and
• {{int:visualeditor-preference-tabs-multi-tab}}.  (This is the state for people using the visual editor now.)

The visual editor uses the same search engine as Special:Search to find links and files. This search will get better at detecting typos and spelling mistakes soon. These improvements to search will appear in the visual editor as well.

The visual editor will be offered to all editors at most "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next few months. The developers would like to know how well the visual editor works in your language. They particularly want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect the following languages: Japanese,

Korean,

Urdu,

Persian,

Arabic,

Tamil,

Marathi,

Malayalam,

Hindi,

Bengali,

Assamese,

Thai,

Aramaic and others.

• Please try out the newest version of the single edit tab on test2.wikipedia.org. You may need to restore the default preferences (at the bottom of test2wiki:Special:Preferences) to see the initial prompt for options. Were you able to find a preference setting that will work for your own editing? Did you see the large preferences dialog box when you started editing an article there?
• Can you read and type in Korean, Arabic, Japanese, Indic, or Han scripts? Language engineer David Chan needs help from people who often type in these languages. Please see the instructions at :mw:VisualEditor/IME Testing#What to test if you can help. Report your results on wiki (Korean – Japanese – all languages).
• Learn how to improve the "automagical" citoid referencing system in the visual editor, by creating Zotero translators for popular sources in your language! Join the [https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2016-February/084840.html Tech Talk about "Automated citations in Wikipedia: Citoid and the technology behind it"] with Sebastian Karcher on 29 February 2016.

If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or [https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Elitre_(WMF)&action=edit§ion=new contact us] directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thanks!

– Whatamidoing (WMF) 17:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

{{multiple image|align = right|direction = vertical|width = 200|header = How to switch between editing environments|header_align=center|image1 = VisualEditor toolbar Page options - Switch to wikitext - Save.png|alt1 = Part of the toolbar in the visual editor|caption1 = Click the to switch to the wikitext editor.|image2 = VisualEditor bi-directional switching pencil icon in wikitext.png|alt2 = Part of the toolbar in the wikitext editor|caption2 = Click the pencil icon to switch to the visual editor.|caption_align=center}}The editing interface will be changed soon. When that happens, editors who currently see two editing tabs – "Edit" and "Edit source" – will start seeing one edit tab instead. The single edit tab has been popular at other Wikipedias. When this is deployed here, you may be offered the opportunity to choose your preferred appearance and behavior the next time you click the Edit button. You will also be able to change your settings in the Editing section of Special:Preferences.

You can choose one or two edit tabs. If you chose one edit tab, then you can switch between the two editing environments by clicking the buttons in the toolbar (shown in the screenshots). See Help:VisualEditor/User guide#Switching between the visual and wikitext editors for more information and screenshots.

There is more information about this interface change at :mw:VisualEditor/Single edit tab. If you have questions, suggestions, or problems to report, then please leave a note at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback.

Whatamidoing (WMF) 19:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Editing News #2—2016

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor team has fixed many bugs. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving support for Arabic and Indic scripts, and adapting the visual editor to the needs of the Wikivoyages and Wikisources.

The visual editor is now available to all users at most Wikivoyages. It was also enabled for all contributors at the French Wikinews.

The single edit tab feature combines the "{{int:vector-view-edit}}" and "{{int:visualeditor-ca-editsource}}" tabs into a single "{{int:vector-view-edit}}" tab. It has been deployed to several Wikipedias, including Hungarian, Polish, English and Japanese Wikipedias, as well as to all Wikivoyages. At these wikis, you can change your settings for this feature in the "{{int:prefs-editing}}" tab of Special:Preferences. The team is now reviewing the feedback and considering ways to improve the design before rolling it out to more people.

The "{{int:Savearticle}}" button will say "{{int:Publishpage}}". This will affect both the visual and wikitext editing systems. More information is available on Meta.

The visual editor will be offered to all editors at the remaining "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next few months. The developers want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect several languages, including: Arabic, Hindi, Thai, Tamil, Marathi, Malayalam, Urdu, Persian, Bengali, Assamese, Aramaic and others.

The team is working with the volunteer developers who power Wikisource to provide the visual editor there, for opt-in testing right now and eventually for all users. (T138966)

The team is working on a modern wikitext editor. It will look like the visual editor, and be able to use the citoid service and other modern tools. This new editing system may become available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices around September 2016. You can read about this project in a general status update on the Wikimedia mailing list.

• Do you teach new editors how to use the visual editor? Did you help set up the Citoid automatic reference feature for your wiki? Have you written or imported TemplateData for your most important citation templates? Would you be willing to help new editors and small communities with the visual editor? Please sign up for the new VisualEditor Community Taskforce.
• Learn how to improve the "automagical" citoid referencing system in the visual editor, by creating Zotero translators for popular sources in your language! Watch the Tech Talk by Sebastian Karcher for more information.

If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or [https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Elitre_(WMF)&action=edit§ion=new contact us] directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. {{int:Feedback-thanks-title}}

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk), 21:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Like us on [https://www.facebook.com/Wikiversity-Journal-of-Medicine-832110790204079/ Facebook] or follow us on [https://twitter.com/Wijoumed Twitter]. Feel free to participate in the journal.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

• Publish an article to the journal.
• Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
• Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
• Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
• Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
• Join the editorial board.
• Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
• [https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Ways_to_Give Donate to Wikimedia Foundation].
• Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
• Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
• Technical work like template designing for the journal.
• Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to {{nospam|updates|wijoumed.org}}. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at {{nospam|haggstrom.mikael|wikiversityjournal.org}}.
• Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the {{nospam|wide-reach|wikiversityjournal.org}} email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

Diptanshu^Talk 14:56, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

-on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.

{{ivmbox|1=Hello, Wouterstomp. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC) |2=Padlock-blue.svg}}

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter • Subscribe or unsubscribe on the English Wikipedia

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has mainly worked on a new wikitext editor. They have also released some small features and the new map editing tool. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the list of work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, releasing the 2017 wikitext editor as a beta feature, and improving language support.

• You can now set text as small or big.[https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T53613]
• Invisible templates have been shown as a puzzle icon. Now, the name of the invisible template is displayed next to the puzzle icon.[https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T141861] A similar feature will display the first part of hidden HTML comments.[https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T147089]
• Categories are displayed at the bottom of each page. If you click on the categories, the dialog for editing categories will open.[https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T145267]
• At many wikis, you can now add maps to pages. Go to the Insert menu and choose the "Maps" item. The Discovery department are adding more features to this area, like geoshapes. You can read more on MediaWiki.org.[https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Discovery#Maps]
• The "Save" button now says "Save page" when you create a page, and "Save changes" when you change an existing page.[https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T139033] In the future, the "{{int:Savearticle}}" button will say "{{int:Publishpage}}". This will affect both the visual and wikitext editing systems. More information is available on Meta.
• Image galleries now use a visual mode for editing. You can see thumbnails of the images, add new files, remove unwanted images, rearrange the images by dragging and dropping, and add captions for each image. Use the "Options" tab to set the gallery's display mode, image sizes, and add a title for the gallery.[https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T45037]

The visual editor will be offered to all editors at the remaining 10 "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next month. The developers want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect several languages, including Thai, Burmese and Aramaic.

The team is working on a modern wikitext editor. The 2017 wikitext editor will look like the visual editor and be able to use the citoid service and other modern tools. This new editing system may become available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices in October 2016. You can read about this project in a general status update on the Wikimedia mailing list.

Do you teach new editors how to use the visual editor? Did you help set up the Citoid automatic reference feature for your wiki? Have you written or imported TemplateData for your most important citation templates? Would you be willing to help new editors and small communities with the visual editor? Please sign up for the new VisualEditor Community Taskforce.

If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or [https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Elitre_(WMF)&action=edit§ion=new contact us] directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy/Newsletter/5}}

Message delivered on behalf of WikiProject Anatomy by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi {{BASEPAGENAME}}.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Wouterstomp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

20px Administrator changes

:20px NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

:20px Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

20px Guideline and policy news

:*A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.

:*Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.

:*Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

20px Technical news

:*When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)

:*Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)

:* The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

20px Arbitration

:*The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

20px Obituaries

:* JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

----

{{center|Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive}}

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi Wouterstomp,

I just want to thank you for making some adjustments to the insulitis page that I worked on! People like you make Wikipedia great!

02:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

30px

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Malignancies and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 27#Malignancies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

{{ivmbox|The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

}}

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I've only just seen the reply that you posted [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anatomy#how_to_get_a_skull_image_for_use_on_WP here], almost 3 months later. Thank you! It seems perfect for what I was trying to do. I'll have a go over the next few days. Dr. Vogel (talk) 23:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

:can you change the angles just a little bit so that you can more clearly see the inion? Dr. Vogel (talk) 20:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Read this in another language • Subscription list for the multilingual newsletter • Local subscription list

File:Junior Contributor New Topic Tool Completion Rate.png

The New topic tool helps editors create new ==Sections== on discussion pages. New editors are more successful with this new tool. You can read the report. Soon, the Editing team will offer this to all editors at most WMF-hosted wikis. You can join the discussion about this tool for the English Wikipedia is at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Enabling the New Topic Tool by default. You will be able to turn it off in the tool or at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion.

The Editing team plans to change the appearance of talk pages. These are separate from the changes made by the mw:Desktop improvements project and will appear in both Vector 2010 and Vector 2022. The goal is to add some information and make discussions look visibly different from encyclopedia articles. You can see some ideas at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project#Prototype Ready for Feedback.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

23:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

File:Desktop Topic Subscriptions median response time.png

The new [{{int:discussiontools-topicsubscription-button-subscribe}}] button notifies people when someone replies to their comments. It helps newcomers get answers to their questions. People reply sooner. You can read the report. The Editing team is turning this tool on for everyone. You will be able to turn it off in your preferences.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) ({{int:Talkpagelinktext}}) 00:36, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

This newsletter includes two key updates about the Editing team's work:

1. The Editing team will finish adding new features to the Talk pages project and deploy it.
2. They are beginning a new project, Edit check.

Talk pages project

File:Page Frame Features on desktop.png

The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the Talk pages project. Nearly all new features are available now in the Beta Feature for {{int:discussiontools-preference-label}}.

It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "{{int:skin-action-addsection}}" button. You will be able to turn them off at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion. Please tell them what you think.

File:Daily edit completion rates mobile talk pages.png

An A/B test for {{int:discussiontools-preference-label}} on the mobile site has finished. Editors were more successful with {{int:discussiontools-preference-label}}. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.

New Project: Edit Check

The Editing team is beginning a project to help new editors of Wikipedia. It will help people identify some problems before they click "{{int:publishchanges}}". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please watch that page for more information. You can join a conference call on 3 March 2023 to learn more.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Hey there wiki-buddy! I'm hoping I can attract some interested folks to consider reviewing the Wikipedia page about amyotrophic lateral sclerosis for Good Article status. As you may know, ALS is a rare and fatal neurodegenerative disease that quickly causes people to lose the ability to move, speak, and breathe. The Wikipedia page about ALS is read over 2,000 times each day in English alone, and often experiences spikes in traffic whenever a celebrity is diagnosed. There have recently been a number of genetic advances made in the space and some recent drug approvals, thanks in part to the momentum started by the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge. I've been grinding away at it since early this year but keen to see it improve further, hope you'll consider! PaulWicks (talk) 08:39, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Wouterstomp. Thank you for your work on Gynecologic cancer. User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

{{Bq|1=Great article.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|Scope creep}}}}. Please remember to sign your reply with {{code|~~~~}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 07:50, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this [https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/294789?lang=en anonymous survey].

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey [https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/294789?lang=en here].

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.

We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this [https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bwKum9LHQGL5bWS survey], which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view its privacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Sam Walton (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)