:en:Waptia

File:Waptia diagram.jpg

Known specimens of Waptia range in length from {{convert|13.5 to 66.5|mm|in}} with the vast majority (~85%) being {{convert|40 to 60|mm|in}} long. The bivalved carapace was saddle shaped, and was thin and non mineralised, and was likely flexible in life. The carapace was laterally compressed (narrow along the sideways axis), and had no distinct boundary between the two halves. The carapace was only attached to the body in a small section near the front of the head. The body was divided into three main segments, the cephalothorax (head), the post-cephalothorax, and the abdomen.

The front of the head bore a pair of reniform (kidney shaped) compound eyes, about {{convert|1|mm|in}} across, which were born on short stalks. One specimen with preserved ommatidia shows that density of ommatidia in the eye was about 600 per square millimetre. It is suggested that this allowed good forward and peripheral vision. A pair of small lobes, about {{convert|1|mm|in}} long, protrude near the eyes. Similar structures are known from the related Canadaspis as well as other mandibulates, and are thought to correspond to the hemi-ellipsoid bodies of crustaceans, and thus likely have an olfactory function. Between the eyes is a triangular structure, dubbed the "median triangular projection", which is probably homologous to the ‘anterior sclerite’ of other Cambrian arthropods. The head bears a pair of antennae, which are composed of 10 elongate cylindrical segments/podomeres, which sequentially reduce in width towards the tip of the antenna. The front ends of each podomere bear setae (hair-like structures), which are orientated at an angle of 75° to 95° relative to the antennae axis.

The mandibles have a three-segmented projection, which are covered with setae. The mandibles shows evidence of sclerotisation toward the edge where the two mandibles contacted, which have a toothed margin. The mandibles likely had a biting and grinding function. The maxillae are composed of at least six, probably nine podomeres, the end podomere bears a pair of claws, along with numerous setae. These likely assisted food manipulation alongside the mandibles. The cephalothorax has four additional pairs of uniramous (single branched) leg-like appendages (endopods), the first three of which are well segmented, with 5 segments, which are tipped with claws, with a 4 or 5 segmented basipod with well developed endites (structures present on the underside of the limb), particularly on the first pair, which project inward from the legs. The fourth leg differs in the fact that only the very end of the leg is segmented, with the rest being annulated, with the annulated regions being fringed by lamellae.

The "post-cephalothorax" has 5 segments, associated with 6 somites with corresponding pairs of uniramous annulated appendages, which are fringed with lamellae. The following abdomen is approximately 60% of the total length, with 6 segments and no corresponding legs, which terminates in a forked tail fluke, in which each fluke is composed of three segments.

File:Waptia mandibles and maxillae.jpg|Diagram of the mandibles (light grey) and maxillae (dark grey) of Waptia in side-on (top) and from below (bottom) with the two versions showing movement range of the appendages.

File:Waptia cephalothoracic appendages.jpg|Morphology of the cephalothoracic appendages in side-on view (top) and from the front

File:Waptia post-cephalothorax appendages.jpg|Post-cephalothorax appendages in side on view (a) with close-up of the tip of the appendage (b) and closeup of the lamellae (c), and a view from below of a sternite with attached appendages

File:Field notebook of Charles D. Walcott from August 31 to September 3, 1909.jpg fossils. Three arthropods are drawn in the entry for August 31 – Marrella, Waptia, and Naraoia.Smithsonian Institution Archives, [http://siarchives.si.edu/collections/siris_arc_293063?back=%2Fcollections%2Fsearch%3Fquery%3DCharles%2520D.%2520Walcott%26page%3D1%26perpage%3D10%26sort%3Drelevancy%26view%3Dlist Accession 10-166], Walcott, Charles D, (Charles Doolittle), 1850-1927, Charles D. Walcott Collection|left]]

File:MountFieldAugust2009.JPG with Wapta Mountain in the background, near Field, British Columbia, Canada|left]]

Waptia fieldensis was one of the first fossils discovered by Charles D. Walcott from the Burgess Shale in August 1909. A rough sketch of Waptia is present in his diary for August 31, 1909, alongside sketches of Marrella and Naraoia.{{cite book |author1=Derek E. G. Briggs |title=The Fossils of the Burgess Shale |author2=Douglas H. Erwin |author3=Frederick J. Collier |publisher=Smithsonian Institution Press |year=1994 |isbn=1-56098-364-7 |pages=157–158 |name-list-style=amp}}{{cite book|author =Stephen Jay Gould|title =Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History|publisher =W. W. Norton & Company|year =1989|isbn =9780393027051|url-access =registration|url =https://archive.org/details/wonderfullifebur00goul}} A formal description for the species was published by Walcott in 1912. The species was named after the two mountains connected by the Fossil Ridge containing the Burgess Shale locality, Wapta Mountain and Mount Field of Yoho National Park, British Columbia, Canada.{{cite web|url=http://burgess-shale.rom.on.ca/en/fossil-gallery/view-species.php?id=130|title=Waptia fieldensis|year=2011|publisher=Royal Ontario Museum|access-date=January 14, 2012|archive-date=September 27, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130927144259/http://burgess-shale.rom.on.ca/en/fossil-gallery/view-species.php?id=130|url-status=dead}}{{cite journal|author=Charles D. Walcott|year=1912|title=Cambrian geology and paleontology II: Middle Cambrian Branchiopoda, Malacostraca, Trilobita, and Merostomata|journal=Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections|volume=57|issue=6|pages=453–456|url=http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Cambrian_Geology_and_Paleontology/Volume_2/Middle_Cambrian_Branchiopoda,_Malacostraca,_Trilobita,_and_Merostomata}} The name of Wapta Mountain itself comes from the First Nation Nakoda word {{lang|asb|wapta}}, meaning "running water"; while Mount Field was named after the American telecommunications pioneer Cyrus West Field.

Specimens of Waptia fieldensis were recovered from the Burgess Shale {{lang|de|Lagerstätte}} of Canada, which dates from the Middle Cambrian period (510 to 505 million years ago).{{cite journal|author=Simon Conway Morris|year=1986|title=The community structure of the Middle Cambrian Phyllopod Bed (Burgess Shale)|journal=Palaeontology|volume=29|issue=Part 3|pages=423–467}} The locality was once about {{convert|200|m|ft|abbr=on}} underwater; it was located at the bottom of a warm and shallow tropical sea adjacent to a submarine limestone cliff (now the Cathedral Limestone Formation). Undersea landslides caused by the collapse of parts of the limestone cliff would periodically bury the organisms in the area (as well as organisms carried by the landslides) in fine-grained mud that later became shale.{{cite book|author=James W. Hagadorn|chapter=Burgess Shale: Cambrian Explosion in Full Bloom|editor=David J. Bottjer|title =Exceptional Fossil Preservation: A Unique View on the Evolution of Marine Life|publisher =Columbia University Press|year =2002|pages=61–89|isbn =978-0-231-10254-4|display-editors=etal}}

Based on the number of individuals, Waptia fieldensis constitutes about 2.55% of the total number of organisms recovered from the Burgess Shale, and 0.86% of the Greater Phyllopod bed. This makes them the third most abundant arthropods of the Burgess Shale (after Marrella and Canadaspis). The National Museum of Natural History alone houses more than a thousand specimens of the species from the Burgess Shale.{{cite journal|author=Rod S. Taylor|year=2002|title=A new bivalved arthropod from the Early Cambrian Sirius Passet fauna, North Greenland|journal=Palaeontology|volume=45|doi=10.1111/1475-4983.00229|issue=Part 1|pages=97–123|bibcode=2002Palgy..45...97T |doi-access=free}} Waptia fieldensis are often found disarticulated, with parts remaining in close proximity to each other.{{cite journal|author1=Jean-Bernard Caron |author2=Donald A. Jackson |name-list-style=amp |year=2006|title=Taphonomy of the Greater Phyllopod Bed community, Burgess Shale|journal=PALAIOS|volume=21|issue=5 |pages=451–465|doi=10.2110/palo.2003.P05-070R|bibcode=2006Palai..21..451C|s2cid=53646959 }}

Specimens of Waptia, referred to as Waptia cf. fieldensis have also found recovered from the Middle Cambrian Spence Shale in Utah, USA.{{cite web|url=http://www.kumip.ku.edu/cambrianlife/Utah-Arthropods-Waptia.html|title=Waptia cf. fieldensis Walcott, 1912|date=October 4, 2007|publisher=Division of Invertebrate Paleontology, University of Kansas|access-date=January 14, 2012|archive-date=May 1, 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230501065512/https://kumip.ku.edu/cambrianlife/Utah-Arthropods-Waptia.html|url-status=dead}}{{cite journal|author1=Derek E. G. Briggs |author2=Bruce S. Lieberman |author3=Jonathan R. Hendricks |author4=Susan L. Halgedahl |author-link4=Susan Halgedahl|author5=Richard D. Jarrard |name-list-style=amp |year=2008|title=Middle Cambrian Arthropods from Utah|journal=Journal of Paleontology|volume=82|issue=2|pages=238–254|doi=10.1666/06-086.1 |bibcode=2008JPal...82..238B |s2cid=31568651 }} Some of these specimens are associated with three dimensionally preserved eggs.{{Cite journal |last1=Moon |first1=Justin |last2=Caron |first2=Jean-Bernard |last3=Gaines |first3=Robert R. |date=January 2022 |title=Synchrotron imagery of phosphatized eggs in Waptia cf. W . fieldensis from the middle Cambrian (Miaolingian, Wuliuan) Spence Shale of Utah |journal=Journal of Paleontology |language=en |volume=96 |issue=1 |pages=152–163 |doi=10.1017/jpa.2021.77 |bibcode=2022JPal...96..152M |s2cid=239239374 |issn=0022-3360|doi-access=free }}

Waptia fieldensis is the only species accepted under the genus Waptia. It is classified under the family Waptiidae (established by Walcott in 1912).{{cite web|url=http://www.helsinki.fi/~mhaaramo/metazoa/protostoma/arthropoda/crustacea/crustaceomorpha.html|title=Crustaceomorpha – crustaceans and related arthropods|author=Mikko Haaramo|date=October 4, 2007|publisher=Mikko's Phylogeny Archive|access-date=January 14, 2012}}

Some authors suggested that Waptia may be allied to crustaceans. Others proposed that it may be only distantly related to crustaceans, being at least a member of a stem group of crustaceans, or even of all arthropods. Waptia was comprehensively redescribed in 2018, and was placed as part of the clade Hymenocarina within Mandibulata, closely related to Crustacea, due to the clear presence of mandibles and maxillae.

File:Chuandianella life reconstruction.jpg, formerly considered closely related to Waptia, but now considered unrelated.]]

In 1975, an apparently very similar species was described from the Lower Cambrian (515 to 520 million years ago) Maotianshan Shale {{lang|de|Lagerstätte}} of Chengjiang, China. It was originally placed within the "ostracod"-like genus Mononotella, as Mononotella ovata. In 1991, Hou Xian-guang and Jan Bergström reclassified it under the new genus Chuandianella when additional discoveries of more complete specimens made its resemblance to W. fieldensis more apparent. Like W. fieldensis, Chuandianella ovata had a bivalved carapace with a median ridge, a pair of caudal rami, a single pair of antennae, and stalked eyes. In 2004, Jun-Yuan Chen tentatively transferred it to the genus Waptia. However, C. ovata had eight abdominal somites in contrast to five in W. fieldensis. Its limbs were biramous and were undifferentiated, unlike those of W. fieldensis. Other authors deemed these differences to be enough to separate it from Waptia to its own genus.{{cite journal|author1=Hu-Qin Liu |author2=De-Gan Shu |name-list-style=amp |year=2004|title=New information on Chuandianella from the Lower Cambrian Chengjiang Fauna, Yunnan, China|trans-title=澄江化石库中川滇虫属化石的新信息|journal=Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition)|language=zh|volume=34|issue=4|pages=453–456|url=http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?anno=2&hl=en&rurl=translate.google.com.ph&sl=zh-CN&tl=en&twu=1&u=http://www.lw23.com/pdf_a4456a32-3294-4029-9188-02baf761bc8f/lunwen.pdf&usg=ALkJrhgmLDJobZvG70e4mgRGhvPrmjI4nw}} In 2022, Chuandianella was redescribed, and was shown to lack mandibles, thus it is probably not closely related to Waptia, despite its similar appearance.{{Cite journal |last1=Zhai |first1=Dayou |last2=Williams |first2=Mark |last3=Siveter |first3=David J. |last4=Siveter |first4=Derek J. |last5=Harvey |first5=Thomas H. P. |last6=Sansom |first6=Robert S. |last7=Mai |first7=Huijuan |last8=Zhou |first8=Runqing |last9=Hou |first9=Xianguang |date=2022-02-22 |title=Chuandianella ovata: An early Cambrian stem euarthropod with feather-like appendages |url=https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2022/3557-chuandianella-ovata |journal=Palaeontologia Electronica |language=English |volume=25 |issue=1 |pages=1–22 |doi=10.26879/1172 |s2cid=247123967 |issn=1094-8074|doi-access=free }}

In 2002, a second similar species, Pauloterminus spinodorsalis, was recovered from the Lower Cambrian Sirius Passet {{lang|de|Lagerstätte}} of the Buen Formation of northern Greenland. It was also identified as a possible waptiid. Like C. ovata it had biramous undifferentiated appendages, but it also had only five abdominal somites like W. fieldensis. However, the poor preservation of the P. spinodorsalis specimens, particularly of the appendages on the head, make it difficult to ascertain its taxonomic placement. This difficulty is further compounded by evidence that the fossils of P. spinodorsalis may in fact be moults (exuviae), and not of the actual animal.

Phylogeny of Hymenocarina after Izquierdo-López and Caron (2024):{{Cite journal |last1=Izquierdo‐López |first1=Alejandro |last2=Caron |first2=Jean‐Bernard |date=24 July 2024 |editor-last=Barrett |editor-first=Spencer |title=The Cambrian Odaraia alata and the colonization of nektonic suspension-feeding niches by early mandibulates |url=https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2024.0622 |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B |language=en |volume=291 |issue=2027 |pages=20240622 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2024.0622 |issn=1471-2954 |s2cid=}}{{clade|{{clade

|label1=Hymenocarina

|1={{clade

|1={{clade

|1={{clade

|1=Tuzoia 70px

|2=Perspicaris70px}}

|2={{clade

|1=Pectocaris 70px

|label2=Protocarididae

|2={{clade

|1=Loricicaris70px

|2={{clade

|1=Tokummia 70px

|2=Branchiocaris 70px

}}}}}}}}

|2={{clade

|1={{clade

|1={{clade

|1=Plenocaris 70px

|2={{clade

|1=Ercaicunia 70px

|2= Clypecaris70px}}}}

|2={{clade

|1=Pauloterminus 70px

|2={{clade

|1=Canadaspis 70px

|2={{clade

|1=Waptia 70px

|2=Chuandianella 70px

}}}}}}}}

|3={{clade

|1=Vermontcaris

|label2=Odaraiidae

|2={{clade

|1=Odaraia 70px

|2={{clade

|1=Jugatacaris 70px

|2={{clade

|1={{clade

|1=Fibulacaris 70px

|2=Pakucaris 70px

}}

|2={{clade

|1=Balhuticaris 70px

|2=Nereocaris 70px

}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

{{multiple image

| align = right

| direction = vertical

| width = 200

| header =

| image1 = Rsos172206f28.jpg

| alt1 =

| caption1 = Life restoration of Waptia

| image2 = Waptia life restoration.webm

| alt2 = Colored dice with checkered background

| caption2 = Animation of Waptia swimming (note eggs attached to inner surface of carapace)

}}

While historically considered deposit feeders,{{cite journal|author1=Roy E. Plotnick |author2=Stephen Q. Dornbos |author3=Jun-Yuan Chen |name-list-style=amp |year=2010|doi=10.1666/08062.1|title=Information landscapes and sensory ecology of the Cambrian Radiation|journal=Paleobiology|volume=36|issue=2|pages=303–317|s2cid=13074384 }} feeding by sifting through the sea bottom for edible organic particles, the 2018 re-examination considered Waptia to have been an actively swimming predator of soft-bodied prey items, using its first three pairs of cephalothorax leg-like appendages to capture and manipulate prey, while moving its lamellated appendages in a rhythmic motion to propel itself through the water. Up and down movement of the abdomen and the tail fan was likely used to move vertically within the water column. It may have used the claws on its cephalothoracic leg-like appendages to occasionally rest on surfaces.{{Cite journal |last1=Vannier |first1=Jean |last2=Aria |first2=Cédric |last3=Taylor |first3=Rod S. |last4=Caron |first4=Jean-Bernard |date=June 2018 |title=Waptia fieldensis Walcott, a mandibulate arthropod from the middle Cambrian Burgess Shale |journal=Royal Society Open Science |language=en |volume=5 |issue=6 |pages=172206 |doi=10.1098/rsos.172206 |issn=2054-5703 |pmc=6030330 |pmid=30110460|bibcode=2018RSOS....572206V }}

In 2015, egg clutches were identified in six specimens from the Burgess Shale. The clutch sizes were small, only containing up to 24 eggs, but each egg was relatively large, with an average diameter of {{convert|2|mm|in|abbr=on}}. They were attached along the inner surface of the bivalved carapace. Along with Kunmingella douvillei and Chuandianella from the Chengjiang biota (around 7 million years older than the Burgess Shale) which also had fossilized eggs preserved inside the carapace, they constitute the oldest direct evidence of brood care and of K-selection among animals. It indicates that they probably lived in an environment which required them to take special measures to ensure the survival of their young.{{cite journal|author1=Jean-Bernard Caron |author2=Jean Vannier |name-list-style=amp |year=2016|title=Waptia and the diversification of brood care in early arthropods|journal=Current Biology|volume=26|issue=1|pages=69–74|doi=10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.006 |pmid=26711492|doi-access=free|bibcode=2016CBio...26...69C }}{{cite journal|author1=Yanhong Duana |author2=Jian Hana |author3=Dongjing Fua |author4=Xingliang Zhanga |author5=Xiaoguang Yanga |author6=Tsuyoshi Komiyac |author7=Degan Shua |name-list-style=amp |year=2014|title=Reproductive strategy of the bradoriid arthropod Kunmingella douvillei from the Lower Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte, South China|journal=Gondwana Research|volume=25|issue=3|pages=983–990|doi=10.1016/j.gr.2013.03.011|bibcode=2014GondR..25..983D}}{{cite web|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/waptia-eggs-1.3372336|title=Burgess Shale fossil Waptia may be oldest mom ever found caring for eggs|author=Emily Chung|date=18 December 2015|publisher=CBC News|access-date=24 May 2016}}{{Cite journal |last1=Ou |first1=Qiang |last2=Vannier |first2=Jean |last3=Yang |first3=Xianfeng |last4=Chen |first4=Ailin |last5=Mai |first5=Huijuan |last6=Shu |first6=Degan |last7=Han |first7=Jian |last8=Fu |first8=Dongjing |last9=Wang |first9=Rong |last10=Mayer |first10=Georg |date=May 2020 |title=Evolutionary trade-off in reproduction of Cambrian arthropods |journal=Science Advances |language=en |volume=6 |issue=18 |pages=eaaz3376 |doi=10.1126/sciadv.aaz3376 |issn=2375-2548 |pmc=7190318 |pmid=32426476|bibcode=2020SciA....6.3376O }}

{{Portal|Paleontology|Arthropods}}

{{div col}}

• Burgessia
• Hymenocaris
• Odaraia
• Perspicaris
• Isoxys
• Yohoia
• Leptostraca
• Phyllocarida
• History of the Burgess Shale
• Stephen Formation
• Walcott Quarry
• Paleobiota of the Burgess Shale

{{div col end}}

{{Reflist|30em}}

{{Commons category}}

• {{Cite web|date=2011|title=Waptia fieldensis|work=Burgess Shale Fossil Gallery|publisher=Virtual Museum of Canada|url=http://burgess-shale.rom.on.ca/en/fossil-gallery/view-species.php?id=130|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112025257/http://burgess-shale.rom.on.ca/en/fossil-gallery/view-species.php?id=130|archive-date=2020-11-12|url-status=dead|access-date=2012-01-14}}
• "[http://paleobiology.si.edu/burgess/waptia.html Waptia fieldensis]". Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History. 2012.

{{Hymenocarina}}

{{Taxonbar|from=Q2309067}}

{{Good article}}

Category:Prehistoric arthropod genera

Category:Cambrian arthropods

Category:Cambrian arthropods of North America

Category:Cambrian Canada

Category:Fossils of Canada

Category:Burgess Shale fossils

Category:Wheeler Shale

Category:Fossil taxa described in 1912

Category:Taxa named by Charles Doolittle Walcott

Category:Hymenocarina

Category:Cambrian genus extinctions