2020 United States presidential election in Michigan

{{Short description|none}}

{{For|related races|2020 United States presidential election}}

{{use mdy dates|date=November 2020}}

{{use American English|date=November 2020}}

{{Infobox election

| election_name = 2020 United States presidential election in Michigan

| country = Michigan

| type = presidential

| ongoing = no

| college_voted = yes

| previous_election = 2016 United States presidential election in Michigan

| previous_year = 2016

| election_date = November 3, 2020

| next_election = 2024 United States presidential election in Michigan

| next_year = 2024

| turnout = 71%{{increase}}{{cite web|url=https://apnews.com/article/record-votes-michigan-highest-turnout-1f7802d2a2e67966ba8ccb02e3d1cbed|date=2020-11-05|title=Record 5.5M voted in Michigan; highest percentage in decades|website=Associated Press}}

| image_size = 200x200px

| last_update = Nov. 18, 2020, 4:57 AM

| time_zone = EST{{cite web |title=Michigan Presidential Election Results 2020|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-elections/michigan-president-results|work=NBC News |access-date=November 18, 2020}}

| image1 = Joe Biden presidential portrait (cropped).jpg

| nominee1 = Joe Biden

| party1 = Democratic Party (United States)

| home_state1 = Delaware

| running_mate1 = Kamala Harris

| electoral_vote1 = 16

| popular_vote1 = 2,804,040

| percentage1 = {{percentage|2,804,040|5,539,302|2|pad=yes}}

| image2 = Donald Trump official portrait (cropped).jpg

| nominee2 = Donald Trump

| party2 = Republican Party (United States)

| home_state2 = Florida

| running_mate2 = Mike Pence

| electoral_vote2 = 0

| popular_vote2 = 2,649,852

| percentage2 = {{percentage|2,649,852|5,539,302|2|pad=yes}}

| map_image = {{Switcher

| 375px

| County results

| 375px

| Congressional district results

| 375px

| Municipality results

| 375px

| Precinct results

}}

| map_caption = {{col-begin}}

{{col-2}}

Biden

{{legend|#B9D7FF|40–50%}}

{{legend|#86B6F2|50–60%}}

{{legend|#4389E3|60–70%}}

{{legend|#1666CB|70–80%}}

{{legend|#0645B4|80–90%}}

{{legend|#002B84|90–100%}}

{{col-2}}

Trump

{{legend|#F2B3BE|40–50%}}

{{legend|#E27F90|50–60%}}

{{legend|#CC2F4A|60–70%}}

{{legend|#D40000|70–80%}}

{{legend|#AA0000|80–90%}}

{{legend|#800000|90–100%}}

{{col-3}}

Tie

{{legend|#D4C4DC}}

{{col-end}}

| title = President

| before_election = Donald Trump

| before_party = Republican Party (United States)

| after_election = Joe Biden

| after_party = Democratic Party (United States)

}}

{{Elections in Michigan sidebar}}

The 2020 United States presidential election in Michigan was held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020, as part of the 2020 United States presidential election in which all 50 states plus the District of Columbia participated.{{Cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections-key-dates-midterms-2020-presidential-house-congress-senate-a8472821.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180802011326/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections-key-dates-midterms-2020-presidential-house-congress-senate-a8472821.html |archive-date=2018-08-02 |url-access=limited |url-status=live|title=US elections key dates: When are the 2018 midterms and the 2020 presidential campaign?|last=Kelly|first=Ben|date=August 13, 2018|work=The Independent|access-date=January 3, 2019}} Michigan voters chose electors to represent them in the Electoral College via a popular vote, pitting the Republican Party's nominee, incumbent President Donald Trump of Florida, and his running mate, Vice President Mike Pence of Indiana against the Democratic Party nominee, former Vice President Joe Biden of Delaware, and his running mate, Senator Kamala Harris of California. Michigan had 16 electoral votes in the Electoral College.{{Cite web|url=https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/allocation.html|title=Distribution of Electoral Votes|website=National Archives and Records Administration|access-date=January 3, 2019}}

In 2016, Trump became the first Republican to carry Michigan since 1988, when George H. W. Bush had scored a decisive nationwide win against Michael Dukakis.{{cite web |last1=Shepard |first1=Steven |title=Michigan certifies Trump as winner |url=https://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/michigan-certifies-trump-as-winner-231885 |website=POLITICO |date=November 28, 2016 |access-date=November 10, 2020 |language=en}} Throughout the campaign, Biden touted his work on the auto bailout in manufacturing towns outside Detroit. Appearing with United Auto Workers, Biden presented a new proposal to penalize American companies for moving manufacturing and service jobs overseas and then selling their products back in the United States.{{Cite web|last=Coleman|first=Justine|date=2020-09-09|title=Biden unveils plan to penalize companies that offshore jobs ahead of Michigan visit|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/515597-biden-unveils-plan-to-penalize-companies-that-offshore-jobs-ahead-of|access-date=2020-11-09|website=TheHill}} Polls of Michigan throughout the campaign generally indicated a clear Biden lead. Prior to election day, most news organizations considered Michigan a likely blue state, or a state that Biden was likely to win.

Biden ultimately carried Michigan by 2.78%, a far closer margin than expected. Per exit polls by the Associated Press, Biden's strength in Michigan came from union households, who composed 21% of the electorate and supported Biden by 56%–42%. Biden was also able to boost minority turnout, consequently winning 93% of Black American voters.{{Cite news |date=2020-11-03 |title=Michigan Voter Surveys: How Different Groups Voted |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/ap-polls-michigan.html |access-date=2020-11-09 |work=The New York Times |issn=0362-4331}} Many voters were also concerned with the COVID-19 pandemic, which had hit the state hard; 52% of voters felt the pandemic was not under control at all, and these voters broke for Biden by 82%–16%. Trump outperformed his polling average in the state, but not by enough to win. Michigan marked Biden's strongest performance in a state won by Trump in 2016, even voting to the left of Nevada which Trump lost in 2016.

Biden flipped the counties of Leelanau, Kent, and Saginaw and became the first Democrat since Woodrow Wilson in 1916 to win the presidency without winning Bay or Gogebic Counties, the first Democrat since Harry S. Truman in 1948 to win without Monroe County, the first Democrat since John F. Kennedy in 1960 to win without Lake County and the first Democrat since Jimmy Carter in 1976 to win without Calhoun, Isabella, Manistee, Shiawassee, or Van Buren Counties.

With Ohio, Florida, and Iowa backing the losing candidate for the first time since 1960, 1992, and 2000 respectively, this election established Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania as the states with the longest bellwether streak still in effect today. The last time any of them voted against the winning candidate was 2004, when all three voted for losing Democrat John Kerry.

Michigan's overall vote in for this election was 1.7% more Republican than the nation-at-large.

Primary elections

The primary elections were held on March 10, 2020.

=Republican primary=

{{transcluded section|source=2020 Michigan Republican presidential primary}}

{{trim|{{#section-h:2020 Michigan Republican presidential primary|Results}}}}

=Democratic primary=

Bernie Sanders and former Vice President Joe Biden were the two major declared Democratic candidates.{{cite news |last1=Taylor |first1=Kate |title=Elizabeth Warren Formally Announces 2020 Presidential Bid in Lawrence, Mass. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/09/us/politics/elizabeth-warren-2020.html |access-date=February 10, 2019 |work=The New York Times |date=February 9, 2019}}

{{transcluded section|source=2020 Michigan Democratic presidential primary}}

{{trim|{{#section-h:2020 Michigan Democratic presidential primary|Results}}}}

General election

=Final predictions=

class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"

!Source

!Ranking

align="left" |The Cook Political Report{{Cite web|url=https://cookpolitical.com/sites/default/files/2020-03/EC%20030920.4.pdf|title=2020 POTUS Race ratings|website=The Cook Political Report|language=en|access-date=2019-05-21}}

|{{USRaceRating|Lean|D|Flip}}

align="left" |Inside Elections{{Cite web|url=https://insideelections.com/ratings/president|title=POTUS Ratings {{!}} Inside Elections|website=insideelections.com|access-date=2019-05-21}}

|{{USRaceRating|Lean|D|Flip}}

align="left" |Sabato's Crystal Ball{{Cite web|url=http://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/2020-president/|title=Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball » 2020 President|website=crystalball.centerforpolitics.org|access-date=2019-05-21}}

|{{USRaceRating|Lean|D|Flip}}

align="left" |Politico{{Cite web |url= https://www.politico.com/2020-election/race-forecasts-and-predictions/president/ |title=2020 Election Forecast|date=November 19, 2019 |publisher=Politico}}

|{{USRaceRating|Lean|D|Flip}}

align="left" |RCP{{cite web |url= https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/2020_elections_electoral_college_map.html|title=Battle for White House|date=April 19, 2019 |publisher=RCP}}

|{{USRaceRating|Tossup}}

align="left" |Niskanen[https://www.niskanencenter.org/bitecofer-post-primary-update/ 2020 Bitecofer Model Electoral College Predictions] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200423025500/https://www.niskanencenter.org/bitecofer-post-primary-update/ |date=April 23, 2020 }}, Niskanen Center, March 24, 2020, retrieved: April 19, 2020.

|{{USRaceRating|Likely|D|Flip}}

align="left" |CNN{{Cite web|author1=David Chalian |author2=Terence Burlij|title=Road to 270: CNN's debut Electoral College map for 2020|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/11/politics/electoral-college-2020-election/index.html|access-date=2020-06-16|website=CNN|date=June 11, 2020 }}

|{{USRaceRating|Lean|D|Flip}}

align="left" |The Economist{{cite news |title=Forecasting the US elections |url=https://projects.economist.com/us-2020-forecast/president |newspaper=The Economist |access-date=July 7, 2020}}

|{{USRaceRating|Likely|D|Flip}}

align="left" |CBS News{{cite web|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/2020-us-election-battleground-tracker/|title=2020 Election Battleground Tracker|website=CBS News|date=July 12, 2020|access-date=July 13, 2020}}

|{{USRaceRating|Lean|D|Flip}}

align="left" |270towin{{cite web|url=https://www.270towin.com/|title=2020 Presidential Election Interactive Map|website=270 to Win}}

|{{USRaceRating|Lean|D|Flip}}

align="left" |ABC News{{cite web|url=https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/2020-Electoral-Interactive-Map?basemap=71662160&promoref=brandpromo|title=ABC News Race Ratings|website=CBS News|date=July 24, 2020|access-date=July 24, 2020}}

|{{USRaceRating|Lean|D|Flip}}

align="left" |NPR{{Cite web|title=2020 Electoral Map Ratings: Trump Slides, Biden Advantage Expands Over 270 Votes|url=https://www.npr.org/2020/08/03/897202359/2020-electoral-map-ratings-trump-slides-biden-advantage-expands-over-270-votes|access-date=2020-08-03|website=NPR.org|date=August 3, 2020 |language=en |last1=Montanaro |first1=Domenico }}

|{{USRaceRating|Lean|D|Flip}}

align="left" |NBC News{{Cite web|title=Biden dominates the electoral map, but here's how the race could tighten|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/meet-the-press/biden-dominates-electoral-map-here-s-how-race-could-tighten-n1236001|access-date=2020-08-06|website=NBC News|date=August 6, 2020 |language=en}}

|{{USRaceRating|Lean|D|Flip}}

align="left" |538{{cite web |title=2020 Election Forecast |url=https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-election-forecast/ |archive-url=https://archive.today/20200812114512/https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-election-forecast/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=August 12, 2020 |website=FiveThirtyEight |date=August 12, 2020 |access-date=August 14, 2020}}

|{{USRaceRating|Solid|D|Flip}}

=Polling=

==Graphical summary==

{{Graph:Chart

| width=700

| height=400 | xAxisTitle=

| yAxisTitle=%support

| xAxisAngle = -40

| yAxisMax = 55

| legend=Candidate

| interpolate = bundle

| size = 77

| xType = date

| y1Title=Trump

| y2Title=Biden

| y3Title=Jorgensen

| y4Title=Hawkins

| y5Title=Other/Undecided

| type=line

| xGrid=

| yGrid=

| x=

2020/01/07,2020/01/12,2020/02/18,2020/02/18,2020/02/20,2020/03/07,2020/03/08,2020/03/08,2020/03/09,2020/03/16,2020/03/20,2020/03/23,

2020/03/25,2020/04/01,2020/04/01,2020/04/08,2020/04/11,2020/04/20,2020/04/21,2020/04/21,2020/04/29,2020/05/05,2020/05/14,2020/05/17,

2020/05/19,2020/05/26,2020/05/30,2020/05/31,2020/06/03,2020/06/04,2020/06/07,2020/06/12,2020/06/14,2020/06/16,2020/06/16,2020/06/17,

2020/06/18,2020/06/20,2020/06/27,2020/06/28,2020/07/10,2020/07/12,2020/07/16,2020/07/16,2020/07/20,2020/07/22,2020/07/24,2020/07/24,

2020/07/24,2020/07/26,2020/07/26,2020/07/29,2020/07/30,2020/07/31,2020/07/31,2020/08/04,2020/08/06,2020/08/09,2020/08/17,2020/08/19,2020/08/23,

2020/08/23,2020/08/29,2020/08/30,2020/09/03,2020/09/03,2020/09/03,2020/09/06,2020/09/07,2020/09/08,2020/09/15,2020/09/15,2020/09/16,

2020/09/19,2020/09/20,2020/09/21,2020/09/21,2020/09/22,2020/09/22,2020/09/23,2020/09/28,2020/09/30,2020/10/01,2020/10/03,2020/10/04,

2020/10/06,2020/10/06,2020/10/07,2020/10/08,2020/10/09,2020/10/11,2020/10/11,2020/10/11,2020/10/12,2020/10/13,2020/10/13,2020/10/14,

2020/10/15,2020/10/18,2020/10/18,2020/10/19,2020/10/20,2020/10/20,2020/10/22,2020/10/24,2020/10/25,2020/10/25,2020/10/26,2020/10/26,2020/10/27,2020/10/28,2020/10/29,2020/10/30,2020/10/31,2020/11/01,2020/11/02

| y1=

43,44,43,43,43,46,41,41,46,44,41,47,

42,46,45,41,43,38,41,44,42,42,39,46,

45,42,44,46,41,39,35,38,45,33,36,36,

45,38,44,43,44,42,50,41,40,42,40,37,

42,42,42,43,40,41,43,43,43,46,38,47,

44,44,42,40,42,44,43,42,43,40,42,44,

41,43,43,45,42,46.7,44,47,44,44,39,43,

43,42,43,43,46,44,40,43,39,43.5,41.7,47,

43,47,41,44,44,40,43,42,44,42,43,41,42,

49,43.7,44,47,43.3,46

| y2=

50,50,43,47,47,44,48,45,44,50,44,48,

47,46,48,50,49,46,49,51,50,50,47,49,

51,50,50,48,53,55,50,51,47,49,47,47,

46,56,50,48,51,48,45,53,49,51,52,49,

48,52,46,49,51,51,52,47,48,49,50,45,

50,48,52,51,47,53,49,52,50,48,53,49,

46,51,53,51,50,46,52,49,53,50,48,51,

51,50,54,50,52,51,48,52,48,51,48.3,46,

54,45,51,51,52,52,50,55,51,49,53,53,52,

47,51.3,54,49,52.7,52

| y3=

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

, , , , , , , , ,02, , ,

, , , , , , , , , ,01, ,

, , , ,03, , , , , , ,01,

03, , , ,03, ,01, , , , , ,

, , , , , ,01,2.1, , ,02, ,

02, , , ,01, ,01, , ,01,03,03,

,03,03, ,02,03, , ,03, ,01,02,03,

02, ,01,02,0.3

| y4=

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

, , , , , , , , , ,01, ,

, , , , , , , , , ,01, ,

, , , , , , , , , , ,01,

, , , ,01, ,00, , , , , ,

, , , , , ,00,0.8, , ,00, ,

01, , , ,00, ,01, , ,0.5,1.5,02,

,02,01, ,00,00, , ,00, ,00,01,00,

00, ,00, ,00

| y5=

07,06,14,10,10,10,11,14,10,06,15,05,

11,08,07,09,08,16,10,05,08,08,14,05,

04,08,06,06,06,06,15,11,08,18,14,17,

09,06,06,09,05,10,05,06,11,07,08,12,

10,06,12,08,06,08,05,10,09,05,10,05,

06,08,02,09,10,03,08,04,07,12,05,05,

13,06,04,04,07,4.4,04,03,03,03,13,06,

06,07,03,05,02,05,10,13,05,5.5,02,03,

03,03,04,05,3.5,05,07,03,02,09,04,07,03,

02,05,01,02,3.7,02

| colors = #E81B23, #3333FF, gold, green, #DCDCDC

| showsymbols = 1,1,1.5,1.5,1

| symbolsShape = cross

}}

==Aggregate polls==

class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:17px"

|+

!Source of poll
aggregation

!Dates
administered

!Dates
updated

!class="unsortable"|Joe
Biden

{{nobold|Democratic}}

!class="unsortable"|Donald
Trump

{{nobold|Republican}}

!class="unsortable"|Other/
Undecided
{{Efn|Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined.|name=othercalc|group=}}

!Margin

270 to Win{{Cite web |title=Michigan 2020 Presidential Election Polls: Biden vs. Trump - 270toWin |url=https://www.270towin.com/2020-polls-biden-trump/michigan/ |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=270toWin.com}}

|October 22 – November 2, 2020

|November 3, 2020

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|49.9%

|44.4%

|5.7%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|{{hs|5.5}}Biden +5.5

Real Clear Politics{{Cite web |title=2020 Michigan Election: Trump vs. Biden Polls {{!}} RealClearPolling |url=https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2020/michigan/trump-vs-biden |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=www.realclearpolling.com |language=en}}

|October 29 – November 1, 2020

|November 3, 2020

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50.0%

|45.8%

|4.2%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|{{hs|5.1}}Biden +4.2

FiveThirtyEight{{Cite web |date= |title=Michigan President: general election Polls {{!}} FiveThirtyEight |url=https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/michigan/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190310193456/https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/michigan/ |archive-date=2019-03-10 |access-date= |website=projects.fivethirtyeight.com}}

|until November 1, 2020

|November 3, 2020

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51.2%

|43.2%

|5.6%

|{{party shading/Democratic}} |{{hs|7.9}}Biden +7.9

colspan="3" |Average

|{{party shading/Democratic}} |50.4%

|44.5%

|5.1%

|{{party shading/Democratic}} |Biden +5.9

==2020 polls==

class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:17px"

! Poll source

! Date(s)
administered

! Sample
size{{efn|name=key|{{Polling Table Key}}}}

! Margin
{{nowrap|of error}}

! class="unsortable" | Donald
Trump

{{nobold|Republican}}

! class="unsortable" |Joe
Biden

{{nobold|Democratic}}

! class="unsortable" |Jo
Jorgensen

{{nobold|Libertarian}}

! class="unsortable" |Howie
Hawkins

{{nobold|Green}}

! class="unsortable" |Other

! class="unsortable" |Undecided

style="text-align:left;"|SurveyMonkey/Axios{{Cite web |title=Candidate preference |url=https://www.tableau.com/data-insights/us-election-2020/candidate-preference |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=www.tableau.com |language=en-US}}

|Oct 20 – Nov 2

|4,549 (LV)

|± 2%

|46%{{efn|Overlapping sample with the previous SurveyMonkey/Axios poll, but more information available regarding sample size}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Research Co.{{Cite web |last=Canseco |first=Mario |date=2020-11-02 |title=Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin Set to Flip in U.S. Election |url=https://researchco.ca/2020/11/02/us2020-eight-states-uspoli/ |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=Research Co. |language=en-US}}

|Oct 31 – Nov 1

|450 (LV)

|± 4.6%

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| -

| -

|2%{{efn|"Someone else" with 2%|name="SE2"}}

|5%

style="text-align:left;"|Change Research/CNBC{{Cite web |last= |first= |date=2020-11-03 |title=States of Play: Battleground & National Likely Voter Surveys |url=https://changeresearch.com/states-of-play-battleground-wave-17/ |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=Change Research |language=en-US}}

|Oct 29 – Nov 1

|383 (LV)

|± 5.01%

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

|3%

|1%

| –

|1%

style="text-align:left;"|Swayable{{Cite news |title=Polls 2020-11-02 (larger states) |url=https://www.swayable.com/polls/2020-11-02-large.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201203070018/https://www.swayable.com/polls/2020-11-02-large.html |archive-date=December 3, 2020 |access-date=2025-03-20 |work=Swayable |language=en-US |url-status=dead }}

|Oct 27 – Nov 1

|413 (LV)

|± 6.5%

|45%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|54%

|1%

|0%

| –

| –

rowspan=3 style="text-align:left;"|Ipsos/Reuters{{Cite web |title=PUBLIC POLL FINDINGS AND METHODOLOGY |url=https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2020-11/topline_reuters_michigan_state_poll_w6_11_01_2020_0.pdf |website=www.ipsos.com}}

|rowspan=3|Oct 27 – Nov 1

|rowspan=3|654 (LV)

|rowspan=3|± 4.4%

|43%{{efn|name=StandardVIresponse|Standard VI response}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|53%

|1%

|0%

|2%{{efn|"Some other candidate" with 2%; West (B) and would not vote with 0%|name="SOC2WWNV0"}}

| –

42%{{efn|If only Biden, Trump and "some other candidate" were available|name="onlyBidTrumSOC"}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

|3%{{efn|"Some other candidate" with 3%; would not vote with 0%|name="SOC3WNV0"}}

|3%

45%{{efn|Results considering those who lean towards a given candidate among those initially predisposed towards abstention, indecision or a candidate besides Biden or Trump in the response section immediately above}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|53%

| -

| -

|2%{{efn|"Some other candidate" with 2%}}

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Trafalgar Group{{Cite web |title=TRF MI Nov 1 Full Report.pdf |url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MijhK0HHc4zCMF2SJ2tQdGV0BUW1AJi3/view |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=Google Docs}}

|Oct 30–31

|1,033 (LV)

|± 2.97%

|{{party shading/Republican}}|48%

|46%

|2%

| -

|1%

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|AtlasIntel{{Cite web |title=2020 Presidential Election: Michigan |url=https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/20201101_MI_atlasintel.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201102040054/https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/20201101_MI_atlasintel.pdf |archive-date=2020-11-02 |website=projects.fivethirtyeight.com}}

|Oct 30–31

|686 (LV)

|± 4%

|46%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

| -

| -

|6%

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Insider Advantage/Center for American Greatness{{Cite web |title=Insider Advantage/Center for American Greatness MI Poll |url=https://overland.amgreatness.com/app/uploads/2020/11/MI-POll-Oct-31st-final-poll-.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201101211054/https://overland.amgreatness.com/app/uploads/2020/11/MI-POll-Oct-31st-final-poll-.pdf |archive-date=2020-11-01 |website=overland.amgreatness.com}}{{efn-ua|name=amgreatness|The Center for American Greatness is a pro-Trump organization}}

|Oct 30–31

|500 (LV)

|± 4.4%

|47%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

|2%

| -

| –

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|Morning Consult{{Cite web |title=2020 U.S. Election Tracker |url=https://pro.morningconsult.com/trackers/2020-us-election-tracker |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=Morning Consult Pro |language=en}}

|Oct 22–31

|1,736 (LV)

|± 2.0%

|44.5%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Emerson College{{Cite web |title=Emerson Polling - Super Poll Sunday: Polling in the Midwest Shows Biden Ahead in Michigan and Tight Races In Ohio and Iowa |url=https://emersonpolling.reportablenews.com/pr/super-poll-sunday-polling-in-the-midwest-shows-biden-ahead-in-michigan-and-tight-races-in-ohio-and-iowa |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=emersonpolling.reportablenews.com}}

|Oct 29–30

|700 (LV)

|± 3.4%

|45%{{efn|With voters who lean towards a given candidate|name="lean"}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

|3%{{efn|"Someone else" with 3%|name="SE3"}}

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Public Policy Polling/Progress Michigan{{Cite web |title=Public Policy Polling/Progress Michigan |url=https://progressmichigan.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/LE-Newsletter-Issue8.pdf |website=progressmichigan.org}}{{efn-ua|name=ProgressMI|Progress Michigan is a non-profit that primarily supports Democratic candidates}}

|Oct 29–30

|745 (V)

|± 3.6%

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|54%

|1%

|0%

| –

|1%

style="text-align:left;"|Targoz Market Research/PollSmart{{Cite web |title=Michigan 2020 PollSmart Poll (Demos) Likely Voters 10/25/2020 to 10/30/2020 |url=https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e28be4ccb16eb0aa6496c31/t/5f9f6cf4622e88214e9f0514/1604283637748/Crosstab+-+Michigan+2020+PollSmart+Poll+%28Demos%29.pdf |website=static1.squarespace.com}}

|Oct 25–30

|993 (LV)

| –

|39%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|53%

| -

| -

|8%{{efn|"Not sure/Someone else/Undecided" with 8%}}

| –

style="text-align:left;"|CNN/SSRS{{Cite web |title=CNN/SSRS |url=http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2020/images/10/31/rel2_mi.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210812003712/http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2020/images/10/31/rel2_mi.pdf |archive-date=August 12, 2021 |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=cdn.cnn.com |url-status=dead }}

|Oct 23–30

|907 (LV)

|± 3.8%

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|53%

|2%

|1%

|1%{{efn|"None of these" with 1%; "Other" with 0%}}

|2%

style="text-align:left;"|Mitchell Research (R)/MIRS{{Cite web |title=Biden's Lead Cut to 7% & Peters' to 5% |url=https://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2020/Mitchell_Poll_MI_November_1_2020.pdf |website=www.realclearpolitics.com}}

|Oct 29

|817 (LV)

|± 3.43%

|45%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

|1%

|1%

|0%{{efn|"Someone else" with no voters}}

|0%

rowspan=3 style="text-align:left;"|RMG Research/PoliticalIQ{{Cite web |url=http://politicaliq.com/2020/10/30/battleground-michigan-biden-51-trump-44/ |title=RMG Research/PoliticalIQ |access-date=October 31, 2020 |archive-date=October 31, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201031154344/http://politicaliq.com/2020/10/30/battleground-michigan-biden-51-trump-44/ |url-status=dead }}

|rowspan=3|Oct 27–29

|rowspan=3|800 (LV)

|rowspan=3| ± 3.5%

|44%{{efn|name=StandardVIresponse}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

| -

| -

|3%

|2%

42%{{efn|Results generated with high Democratic turnout model|name="highDemo"}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|53%

| -

| -

|3%

|2%

45%{{efn|Results generated with high Republican turnout model|name="highRepub"}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| -

| -

|3%

|2%

style="text-align:left;"|Redfield & Wilton Strategies{{Cite web |date=2020-11-03 |title=Eve of the Election Report and Final Swing States Voting Intention (26-29 October) |url=https://redfieldandwiltonstrategies.com/eve-of-the-election-report-and-final-swing-states-voting-intention-26-29-october/ |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=Redfield & Wilton Strategies |language=en-GB}}

|Oct 26–29

|1,212 (LV)

| –

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|54%

|1%

|0%

|1%

|4%

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA{{Cite web |title=EPIC▪MRA STATEWIDE POLL OF ACTIVE & LIKELY VOTERS – 2ND OCT STATEWIDE [FREQUENCY REPORT OF SURVEY RESPONSES - 600 SAMPLE - ERROR ±4.0%] |url=https://www.woodtv.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/51/2020/10/2020-Second-October-EPICMRA-poll-110120.pdf |website=www.woodtv.com}}

|Oct 25–28

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

| -

| -

|5%{{efn|"Third party" with 5%}}

|6%{{efn|Includes "Refused"|name="inclRefu"}}

style="text-align:left;"|Trafalgar Group{{Cite web |title=TRF MI '20 1029 Poll Report.pdf |url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZEvKCyr9EKALfllUm9K3_xnnilz8E4OC/view |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=Google Docs}}

|Oct 25–28

|1,058 (LV)

|± 2.93%

|{{party shading/Republican}}|49%

|47%

|2%

| -

|1%{{efn|"Someone else" with 1%|name="SE1"}}

|1%

style="text-align:left;"|Kiaer Research{{Cite web |title=Oct. 2020 Poll Results |url=https://kiaerresearch.com/oct-2020-poll |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=Kiaer Research |language=en-US}}

|Oct 21–28

|669 (LV)

|± 5.6%

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|54%

| -

| -

|2%{{efn|"Other/third party" with 2%}}

|4%

style="text-align:left;"|SurveyMonkey/Axios

|Oct 1–28, 2020

|7,541 (LV)

| –

|45%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|53%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Mitchell Research (R)/MIRS{{Cite web |title=Biden Leads by 10% & Peters Leads by 9 (Biden 52% - Trump 42%/Peters 52% - James 43%) |url=https://mirsnews.com/images/MIRS-Mitchell_Poll_Press_Release-_Field_Copy_-_Crosstabs_10-28-20.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201029013114/https://mirsnews.com/images/MIRS-Mitchell_Poll_Press_Release-_Field_Copy_-_Crosstabs_10-28-20.pdf |archive-date=2020-10-29 |website=mirsnews.com}}

|Oct 25–27

|759 (LV)

|± 3.56%

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

|3%

|0%

|0%{{efn|"Someone else" with 0%}}

|2%

style="text-align:left;"|Swayable{{Cite web |title=Swayable National Polling for 2020 Presidential Elections |url=https://www.swayable.com/polls/2020-10-28/ |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=www.swayable.com |language=en}}

|Oct 23–26, 2020

|394 (LV)

|± 6.7%

|40%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|59%

|2%

|0%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Siena College/NYT Upshot{{Cite web |title=The New York Times/Siena College Research Institute October 23-26, 2020 |url=https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/mi102320-crosstabs/9308372de600fa49/full.pdf |website=int.nyt.com}}

|Oct 23–26

|856 (LV)

|± 3.8%

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

|2%

|1%

|0%{{efn|"Someone else" and would not vote with 0%}}

|6%{{efn|name="inclRefu"}}

rowspan=2 style="text-align:left;"|Ipsos/Reuters{{Cite web |title=PUBLIC POLL FINDINGS AND METHODOLOGY |url=https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2020-10/topline_reuters_michigan_state_poll_w5_10_27_2020.pdf |website=www.ipsos.com}}

|rowspan=2|Oct 20–26

|rowspan=2|652 (LV)

|rowspan=2|± 4.4%

|43%{{efn|name=StandardVIresponse}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|53%

|1%

|0%

|2%{{efn|name="SOC2WWNV0"}}

| –

43%{{efn|name="onlyBidTrumSOC"}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

|3%{{efn|name="SOC3WNV0"}}

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|Wick Surveys{{Cite web |url=https://medium.com/wick-research/predicting-2020-research-on-the-research-57ad9b7b3d5a |title=Wick Surveys |access-date=November 3, 2020 |archive-date=December 3, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201203105519/https://medium.com/wick-research/predicting-2020-research-on-the-research-57ad9b7b3d5a |url-status=dead }}

|Oct 24–25

|1,000 (LV)

|± 3.1%

|48%

|48%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group/Detroit News{{Cite web |last=Haddad |first=Ken |date=2020-10-27 |title=Poll: Biden preserves lead over Trump in Michigan, including 32-point lead with seniors |url=https://www.clickondetroit.com/decision-2020/2020/10/27/poll-biden-preserves-lead-over-trump-in-michigan-including-32-point-lead-with-seniors/ |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=WDIV |language=en}}

|Oct 23–25

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

| -

| -

|2%{{efn|"Third party" with 2%}}

|4%

style="text-align:left;"|ABC/Washington Post{{Cite web |title=COVID Surge Hurts Trump in WI; Biden Leads in a Closer MI Contest |url=https://www.langerresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/1216a52020StateBattlegrounds-MIWI.pdf |website=www.langerresearch.com}}

|Oct 20–25

|789 (LV)

|± 4%

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

|3%

|0%

|0%{{efn|"Other" and "None of these" with 0%; would not vote with no voters}}

|1%

style="text-align:left;"|Gravis Marketing{{Cite web |date=2020-10-25 |title=Michigan Poll Results 2020 |url=https://gravismarketing.com/michigan-poll-results-2020/ |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=Gravis Marketing |language=en-US}}

| Oct 24

|679 (LV)

|± 3.8%

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|55%

| -

| -

| –

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|Public Policy Polling/American Bridge PAC{{Cite web |title=Michigan Survey Results |url=https://americanbridgepac.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/MichiganResults.pdf |website=americanbridgepac.org}}{{efn-ua|The American Bridge PAC exclusively supports Democratic candidates}}

|Oct 21–22

|804 (V)

| –

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| -

| -

| –

|6%

style="text-align:left;"|YouGov/University of Wisconsin-Madison{{Cite web |title=Fourth 2020 Election Survey |url=https://elections.wisc.edu/fourth-2020-election-survey/ |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=Elections Research Center |language=en-US}}

|Oct 13–21

|681 (LV)

|± 4.2%

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

|5%{{efn|Includes Undecided}}

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Citizen Data{{Cite web |title=VoteByMail/VoteByMail-Michigan/Modeling/October/Michigan VBM Toplines 10_23_2020.pdf at master · GetCitizenData/VoteByMail |url=https://github.com/GetCitizenData/VoteByMail/blob/master/VoteByMail-Michigan/Modeling/October/Michigan%20VBM%20Toplines%2010_23_2020.pdf |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=GitHub |language=en}}

|Oct 17–20

|1,000 (LV)

|± 3.1%

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

|1%

|0%

|1%

|7%

style="text-align:left;"|Fox News{{Cite web |title=MICHIGAN |url=https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2020/10/Fox_October-17-20-2020_Complete_Michigan_Topline_October-21-Release.pdf |website=static.foxnews.com}}

|Oct 17–20

|1,032 (LV)

|± 3.0%

|40%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

|3%

|0%

|2%{{efn|"Other" with 2%; would not vote with no voters}}

|3%

rowspan=2 style="text-align:left;"|Ipsos/Reuters{{Cite web |title=Biden maintains his lead over Trump in Michigan |url=https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2020-10/topline_reuters_michigan_state_poll_w4_10_20_2020.pdf |website=www.ipsos.com}}

|rowspan=2|Oct 14–20

|rowspan=2|686 (LV)

|rowspan=2|± 4.3%

|44%{{efn|name=StandardVIresponse}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

|2%

|0%

|2%{{efn|name="SOC2WWNV0"}}

| –

44%{{efn|name="onlyBidTrumSOC"}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

| -

| -

|3%{{efn|name="SOC3WNV0"}}

|2%

style="text-align:left;"|Morning Consult

|Oct 11–20

|1,717 (LV)

|± 2.4%

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Change Research/CNBC{{Cite web |last=Pramuk |first=Jacob |date=2020-10-20 |title=Voters want Senate to prioritize coronavirus relief over Supreme Court, new poll finds |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/20/voters-want-senate-to-choose-coronavirus-stimulus-over-supreme-court.html |access-date=2025-03-20 |website=CNBC |language=en}}

|Oct 16–19

|718 (LV){{efn|name=538data|Additional data sourced from FiveThirtyEight}}

| –

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA{{Cite web |title=EPIC▪MRA STATEWIDE OCTOBER POLL OF ACTIVE & LIKELY NOVEMBER VOTERS [FREQUENCY REPORT OF SURVEY RESPONSES - 600 SAMPLE - ERROR ±4.0%] |url=https://www.woodtv.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/51/2020/10/2020-EPICMRA-Omnibus-Statewide-Oct-Poll-102320.pdf |website=www.woodtv.com}}

|Oct 15–19

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|39%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

| -

| -

|5%{{efn|"Third party candidate" with 5%|name="TPC5"}}

|8%{{efn|name="inclRefu"}}

style="text-align:left;"|Mitchell Research (R)/MIRS{{Cite web |title=Biden Leads by 10% & Peters Leads by 6% (Biden 51% - Trump 41%/Peters 49% - James 43%) |url=https://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2020/Mitchell_Research_MI_10-18-20.pdf |website=www.realclearpolitics.com}}

|Oct 18

|900 (LV)

|± 3.27%

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

|3%

|1%

|1%{{efn|name="SE1"}}

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|Trafalgar Group/Restoration PAC{{Cite web |title=Michigan Statewide Presidential & U.S. Senate Survey |url=https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/restoration/pages/1001/attachments/original/1603307463/RSTP_MI_'20_Oct_Press_Report.pdf?1603307463 |website=d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net}}{{efn-ua|name=restoration|The Restoration PAC is a 501 non-profit which supports Donald Trump's 2020 presidential campaign}}

|Oct 15–18

|1,034 (LV)

|± 2.97%

|{{party shading/Republican}}|47%

|45%

|3%

|2%

|2%{{efn|name="SE2"}}

|2%

style="text-align:left;"|Data For Progress{{Cite web|url=https://filesforprogress.org/memos/2020-senate-project/week-5/toplines/dfp_psp_mi_10.21.2020.pdf|title=Data For Progress}}

|Oct 15–18

|830 (LV)

|± 3.4%

|45%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

|2%

|0%

| –

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|Zia Poll/Painter Communications/MIRS News{{Cite web |url=https://mirsnews.com/pdfs/poll_cross_tabs/1603227211.pdf |title=Zia Poll/Painter Communications/MIRS News |access-date=October 23, 2020 |archive-date=October 24, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201024034428/https://mirsnews.com/pdfs/poll_cross_tabs/1603227211.pdf |url-status=dead }}

|Oct 11–18

|2,851 (LV)

|± 2.5%

|{{party shading/Republican}}|49%

|45%

| -

| -

|2%

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|HarrisX/The Hill{{Cite web|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/521421-biden-holds-five-point-lead-over-trump-in-pennsylvania-poll|title=Biden holds 5-point lead over Trump in Pennsylvania: poll}}

|Oct 12–15

|1,289 (LV)

| –

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|54%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Trafalgar Group{{Cite web|url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bfVKzx-3jkXRkjysTxH1k-h9ZIThV_7x/view|title=TRF MI '20 Oct Poll Report.pdf|website=Google Docs}}

|Oct 11–14

|1,025 (LV)

|± 2.97%

|{{party shading/Republican}}|47%

|46%

|3%

|2%

|2%{{efn|name="SE2"}}

|2%

style="text-align:left;"|Redfield & Wilton Strategies{{Cite web|url=https://redfieldandwiltonstrategies.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Redfield__Wilton_Strategies_Eve_of_the_Election_Report_SB.pdf#page=22|title=Redfield & Wilton Strategies}}

|Oct 10–13

|972 (LV)

| –

|42%{{efn|name=538data}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

|1%

|0%

| –

| –

rowspan=3 style="text-align:left;"|RMG Research/PoliticalIQ{{Cite web |url=http://politicaliq.com/2020/10/15/battleground-mi-biden-48-trump-42/ |title=RMG Research/PoliticalIQ |access-date=October 15, 2020 |archive-date=October 15, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201015183326/http://politicaliq.com/2020/10/15/battleground-mi-biden-48-trump-42/ |url-status=dead }}

|rowspan=3|Oct 8–13

|rowspan=3|800 (LV)

|rowspan=3| –

|42%{{efn|name=StandardVIresponse}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

|2%

|1%

|1%

|5%

39%{{efn|name="highDemo"}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

|2%

|1%

|1%

|5%

44%{{efn|name="highRepub"}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|46%

|2%

|1%

|1%

|5%

rowspan=2 style="text-align:left;"|Ipsos/Reuters{{Cite web|url=https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2020-10/topline_reuters_michigan_state_poll_w3_10_13_2020.pdf|title=Ipsos/Reuters}}

|rowspan=2|Oct 7–13

|rowspan=2|620 (LV)

|rowspan=2|± 4.5%

|44%{{efn|name=StandardVIresponse}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

|2%

|1%

|2%{{efn|"Some other candidate" and West (B) with 1%; would not vote with 0%}}

| –

43%{{efn|name="onlyBidTrumSOC"}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

| -

| -

|3%{{efn|name="SOC3WNV0"}}

|2%

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA/Detroit Free Press{{Cite web|url=https://www.woodtv.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/51/2020/10/2020-OCTOBER-FIRST-MEDIA-WEDNESDAY-FREQUENCY.pdf|title=EPIC-MRA/Detroit Free Press}}

|Oct 8–12

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|39%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

| -

| -

|4%{{efn|"Third party candidate" with 4%}}

|9%{{efn|name="inclRefu"}}

style="text-align:left;"|Civiqs/Rust Belt Rising{{Cite web|url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/191PrxEKwpYvRBlp0qfofqUwB9tlQvxgE/view|title=Civiqs_RustBeltRising_banner_book_2020_10_MI.pdf|website=Google Docs}}{{efn-ua|name=rustbelt|Rust Belt Rising is affiliated with the Democratic Party}}

|Oct 8–11

|543 (LV)

|± 4.6%

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

|4%{{efn|"Someone else" with 4%}}

|2%

style="text-align:left;"|Siena College/NYT Upshot{{Cite web|url=https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/miwi1020-crosstabs/b0a09cd1cd0048df/full.pdf|title=Siena College/NYT Upshot}}

|Oct 6–11

|614 (LV)

|± 4.6%

|40%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

|1%

|1%

|1%{{efn|"Someone else" with 1%; would not vote with 0%}}

|8%{{efn|name="inclRefu"}}

style="text-align:left;"|Morning Consult{{Cite web|url=https://pro.morningconsult.com/trackers/2020-us-election-tracker|title=2020 U.S. Election Tracker|website=Morning Consult Pro}}

|Oct 2–11

|1,710 (LV)

|± 2.4%

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Redfield & Wilton Strategies

|Oct 9–10

|827 (LV)

| –

|41%{{efn|name=538data}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

|2%

|1%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|YouGov/CBS{{Cite web|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-trump-poll-michigan-nevada-iowa-battleground-states/|title=Biden leads Trump in Michigan and Nevada, and race is tied in Iowa — CBS News Battleground Tracker poll - CBS News|first1=Jennifer De|last1=Pinto|first2=Fred|last2=Backus|first3=Anthony|last3=Salvanto|first4=Kabir|last4=Khanna|first5=Elena|last5=Cox|date=October 12, 2020|website=www.cbsnews.com}}

|Oct 6–9

|1,190 (LV)

|± 3.3%

|46%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

|2%{{efn|"Other third party" with 2%}}

|0%

style="text-align:left;"|Baldwin Wallace University{{Cite web|url=https://www.bw.edu/Assets/community-research-institute/10-2020-bw-gl-poll-4-final.pdf|title=Baldwin Wallace University}}

|Sep 30 – Oct 8

|1,134 (LV)

|± 3.2%

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

|1%

|1%

|0%{{efn|"Another candidate" with 0%}}

|4%

style="text-align:left;"|Emerson College{{Cite web|url=https://emersonpolling.reportablenews.com/pr/michigan-2020-democrats-hold-10-point-leads-in-presidential-and-us-senate-races|title=Emerson Polling - Michigan 2020: Democrats Hold 10 Point Leads in Presidential and US Senate Races|website=emersonpolling.reportablenews.com}}

|Oct 6–7

|716 (LV)

|± 3.6%

|43%{{efn|name="lean"}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|54%

| -

| -

|2%{{efn|name="SE2"}}

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Redfield & Wilton Strategies{{Cite web|url=https://redfieldandwiltonstrategies.com/latest-us-swing-states-voting-intention-4-7-october/|title=Latest US Swing States Voting Intention (4-7 October)|date=October 9, 2020}}

| Oct 4–6

| 700 (LV)

| ± 3.7%

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

|1%

|0%

|1%{{efn|"Another Third Party/Write-in" with 1%|name="ATPWI1"}}

|6%

style="text-align:left;"|Opinion Insight/American Action Forum{{Cite web|url=https://www.americanactionforum.org/insight/michigan-policy-priorities-and-the-election-october-update/|title=Michigan: Policy Priorities and the Election - October Update|website=AAF}}{{efn-ua|name=americanaction}}

|Oct 3–6

|800 (LV)

|± 3.46%

|44%{{efn|name="lean"}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

|2%

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|Ipsos/Reuters{{Cite web|url=https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2020-10/topline_reuters_michigan_state_poll_w2_10_06_2020.pdf|title=Ipsos/Reuters}}

|Sep 29 – Oct 6

|709 (LV)

|± 4.2%

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

| -

| -

|2%{{efn|"Some other candidate" with 2%; would not vote with 0%|name="SOC2WNV0"}}

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|Change Research/CNBC{{Cite web|url=https://changeresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/CNBC-CR_Battleground_Toplines_Wave-15_October-2-4-Wave-15_-10_2-4.pdf|title=Change Research/CNBC}}

|Oct 2–4

|676 (LV)

| –

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group/Detroit News{{Cite web|url=https://www.clickondetroit.com/decision-2020/2020/10/07/full-poll-michigan-voters-on-biden-vs-trump-senate-race-supreme-court-vaccines/|title=Full poll: Michigan voters on Biden vs. Trump, Senate race, Supreme Court, vaccines|first=Ken|last=Haddad|date=October 7, 2020|website=WDIV}}

|Sep 30 – Oct 3

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|39%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

| -

| -

| 5%{{efn|"Refused" with 3%; "Third Party" with 2%}}

| 7%

style="text-align:left;"|Public Policy Polling/Progress Michigan{{Cite web|url=https://progressmichigan.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/MichiganResults-October.pdf|title=Public Policy Polling/Progress Michigan}}{{efn-ua|name=ProgressMI}}

|Sep 30 – Oct 1

|746 (V)

| –

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

|2%

|1%

| –

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|SurveyMonkey/Axios

|Sep 1–30

|3,297 (LV)

| –

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|53%

| -

| -

| –

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|Trafalgar Group/Restoration PAC{{Cite web|url=https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/restoration/pages/884/attachments/original/1601438834/RSTP_MI_'20_Sept_Press_Report.pdf?1601438834|title=Trafalgar Group/Restoration PAC}}{{efn-ua|name=restoration}}

|Sep 26–28

|1,042 (LV)

|± 2.95%

|47%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

|2%

|0%

|1%{{efn|name="SE1"}}

|2%

style="text-align:left;"|Redfield & Wilton Strategies{{Cite web|url=https://redfieldandwiltonstrategies.com/latest-us-swing-states-voting-intention-23-27-september/|title=Latest US Swing States Voting Intention (23-27 September)|date=October 2, 2020}}

|Sep 23–26

|785 (LV)

|± 3.5%

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

|1%

|0%

|0%{{efn|"Another Third Party/Write-in" with 0%|name="ATPWI0"}}

|6%

style="text-align:left;"|Marist College/NBC{{Cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/meet-the-press/majorities-michigan-wisconsin-say-2020-winner-should-get-fill-scotus-n1241199|title=Majorities in Michigan, Wisconsin say winner should get to fill Supreme Court seat|date=September 27, 2020|website=NBC News}}

|Sep 19–23

|799 (LV)

|± 4.3%

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

|1%

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|ALG Research/Committee to Protect Medicare{{Cite web|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/519035-biden-leads-trump-by-8-points-in-michigan-poll|title=Biden leads Trump by 8 points in Michigan: poll}}{{efn-ua|The Committee to Protect Medicare is a PAC with a history of buying ads arguing against the reelection of Trump}}

| Sep 17–23

| 800 (LV)

|± 3.5%

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Trafalgar Group{{Cite web|url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gUrxmVI0S8G0klptrEM6Etj4s38iAaCC/view|title=MI '20 Sept Pres Poll Report.pdf|website=Google Docs}}

| Sep 20–22

| 1,015 (LV)

|± 2.99%

|{{party shading/Republican}}|46.7%

|46.0%

|2.1%

|0.8%

|1.2%{{efn|"Someone else" with 1.2%}}

|3.2%

style="text-align:left;"|Baldwin Wallace University{{Cite web|url=https://www.bw.edu/Assets/stories/2020/fall/2020_glp_3%20final-1.pdf|title=Baldwin Wallace University}}

| Sep 9–22

| 1,001 (LV)

| ± 3.6%

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

|1%

|0%

|1%{{efn|"Another candidate" with 1%}}

|6%

style="text-align:left;"|YouGov/UW-Madison Elections Research
Center/Wisconsin State Journal{{Cite web|url=https://elections.wisc.edu/third-2020-election-survey/|title=Third 2020 Election Survey|website=Elections Research Center}}

| Sep 10–21

| 641 (LV)

| –

|45%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Change Research/CNBC{{Cite web |last= |first= |date=September 23, 2020 |title=States of Play: Battleground & National Likely Voter Surveys on the Mail-in Election, COVID-19 and the Supreme Court |url=https://changeresearch.com/states-of-play-battleground-wave-14/ |website=Change Research}}

| Sep 18–20

| 568 (LV)

| –

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Hart Research Associates/Human Rights Campaign{{Cite web|url=https://www.hrc.org/parts/HRC-Poll-917-202020.pdf|title=Hart Research Associates/Human Rights Campaign}}{{Dead link|date=March 2025 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}{{efn-ua|The Human Rights Campaign endorsed Biden prior to this poll's sampling period}}

|Sep 17–19

|400 (LV)

|± 4.9%

|45%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| -

| -

| –

| –

rowspan=2 style="text-align:left;"|Data for Progress (D){{Cite web|url=https://filesforprogress.org/memos/2020-senate-project/week-1/MI_1.pdf|title=Data for Progress (D)}}

|rowspan=2 |Sep 14–19

|rowspan=2 |455 (LV)

|rowspan=2 |± 4.6%

|42%{{efn|name=StandardVIresponse}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

|1%

|0%

| –

|9%

44%{{efn|If only Trump and Biden were candidates}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| -

| -

| –

|6%

style="text-align:left;"|MRG{{Cite web|url=https://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2020/MRG_Michigan_September_2020.pdf|title=MRG}}

|Sep 14–19

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|46%

| -

| -

|8%{{efn|"Someone else" with 7%; "Refused" with 1%; would not vote with 0%}}

|5%

style="text-align:left;"|Ipsos/Reuters{{Cite web|url=https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2020-09/topline_reuters_michigan_state_poll_w1_09_22_2020.pdf|title=Ipsos/Reuters}}

|Sep 11–16

|637 (LV)

|± 4.4%

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

| -

| -

|2%{{efn|name="SOC2WNV0"}}

|4%

style="text-align:left;"|Civiqs/Rust Belt Rising{{Cite web|url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1MnN8_rRNinle5U0mqlkF4Gs2XOhROk_w/view|title=Civiqs_RustBeltRising_banner_book_2020_09_MI.pdf|website=Google Docs}}{{efn-ua|name=rustbelt}}

|Sep 11–15

|517 (RV)

| –

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|53%

| -

| -

|3%{{efn|name="SE3"}}

|1%

style="text-align:left;"|Redfield & Wilton Strategies{{Cite web|url=https://redfieldandwiltonstrategies.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/US-Swing-State-Polls-Mid-September-Cover-Sheet.pdf|title=Redfield & Wilton Strategies}}

|Sep 12–14

|930 (LV)

|± 3.21%

|39%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

|2%

|1%

|0%{{efn|name="ATPWI0"}}

|9%

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA{{Cite web|url=https://www.woodtv.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/51/2020/09/September-Statewide-EPIC-MRA-poll-091820.pdf|title=EPIC-MRA}}

|Sep 10–15

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|40%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

| -

| -

|5%{{efn|name="TPC5"}}

|7%{{efn|name="inclRefu"}}

style="text-align:left;"|Benenson Strategy Group/GS Strategy Group/AARP{{Cite web|url=https://www.aarp.org/research/topics/politics/info-2020/2020-election-battleground-state-surveys.html|title=2020 Election Battleground State Surveys|work=AARP |last1=Bridges |first1=Katherine }}

|Aug 28 – Sep 8

|1,600 (LV)

|± 2.5%

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| -

| -

|1%{{efn|Would not vote with 1%}}

|5%

style="text-align:left;"|Morning Consult{{Cite web|url=https://pro.morningconsult.com/articles/trump-biden-race-tightens-2020-polling|title=Presidential Contest Tightens as Campaigns Move Into Eight-Week Home Stretch|website=Morning Consult Pro}}

|Aug 29 – Sep 7

|1,455 (LV)

|± (2%–4%)

|42%{{efn|Overlapping sample with the previous Morning Consult poll, but more information available regarding sample size}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Change Research/CNBC{{Cite web|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/09/2020-election-polls-biden-leads-trump-in-az-fl-mi-nc-pa-and-wi.html|title=Biden leads in six 2020 swing states as Trump sees no convention bounce, CNBC/Change Research poll finds|first=Jacob|last=Pramuk|date=September 9, 2020|website=CNBC}}

|Sep 4–6

|876 (LV)

| –

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

| -

| -

|7%{{efn|"Other/not sure" with 7%}}

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Pulse Opinion Research/Rasmussen Reports{{Cite web|url=https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2020/questions/questions_michigan_presidential_race_september_2_3_2020|title=Questions - Michigan Presidential Race - September 2-3, 2020 - Rasmussen Reports®|website=www.rasmussenreports.com}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2020/michigan_biden_51_trump_43|title=Michigan: Biden 51%, Trump 43%|website=www.rasmussenreports.com}}

|Sep 2–3

|1,000 (LV)

|± 3%

|44%{{efn|name="lean"}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|53%

| -

| -

|3%{{efn|"Some other candidate" with 3%}}

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group{{Cite web|url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/09/08/poll-biden-lead-michigan-narrows-but-trumps-support-flat/5745071002/|title=Biden's lead in Michigan narrows, Trump's support flat in Detroit News/WDIV poll|first=Craig|last=Mauger|website=The Detroit News}}

|Sep 1–3

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|47%

| -

| -

|4%{{efn|"Refused" with 3%; "Third party" with 1%}}

|7%

style="text-align:left;"|Redfield & Wilton Strategies{{Cite web|url=https://redfieldandwiltonstrategies.com/latest-us-swing-states-voting-intention-30-august-4-september/|title=Latest US Swing States Voting Intention (30 August–4 September)|date=September 8, 2020}}

|Aug 30 – Sep 3

|967 (LV)

|± 3.15%

|40%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

|1%

|0%

|1%{{efn|name="ATPWI1"}}

|7%

style="text-align:left;"|Opinion Insight/American Action Forum{{Cite web|url=https://www.americanactionforum.org/insight/michigan-policy-priorities-and-the-election/|title=Michigan: Policy Priorities and the Election|website=AAF}}{{efn-ua|name=americanaction|The American Action Forum is a 501 organization which usually supports Republican candidates}}

|Aug 30 – Sep 2

|802 (LV)

|± 3.46%

|44%{{efn|name="lean"}}

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

|2%

|1%

|0%{{efn|Would not vote with 0%}}

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|SurveyMonkey/Axios

|Aug 1–31

|2,962 (LV)

| –

|48%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

| -

| -

| –

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|Morning Consult{{Cite web|url=https://pro.morningconsult.com/articles/battleground-presidential-polling-post-conventions|title=Arizona Stands Out From a Mostly Static Presidential Race in Battleground States|website=Morning Consult Pro}}

| Aug 21–30

| 1,424 (LV)

|± (2%–4%)

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Public Policy Polling/Progress Michigan{{Cite web|url=https://progressmichigan.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/MichiganResults_Sept.pdf|title=Public Policy Polling/Progress Michigan}}{{efn-ua|name=ProgressMI}}

| Aug 28–29

| 897 (V)

| –

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

|3%

|1%

| –

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|Change Research/CNBC{{Cite web |last= |first= |date=August 26, 2020 |title=States of Play: Battleground & National Likely Voter Surveys on the DNC, COVID-19, schools, and the economy |url=https://changeresearch.com/states-of-play-battleground-wave-12/ |website=Change Research}}

| Aug 21–23

| 809 (LV)

| –

| 44%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Trafalgar Group{{Cite web|url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/12_IApGhCQY27OukwWXGnk0MFgfPctmhQ/view|title=MI '20 Aug Poll Report.pdf|website=Google Docs}}

|Aug 14–23

|1,048 (LV)

|± 2.98%

|{{party shading/Republican}}|47%

|45%

|3%

| -

|1%{{efn|"Another party candidate" with 1%}}

|4%

style="text-align:left;"|Redfield and Wilton Strategies{{Cite web|url=https://redfieldandwiltonstrategies.com/latest-us-swing-states-voting-intention-16-19-august/|title=Latest US Swing States Voting Intention (16-19 August)|date=August 21, 2020}}

|Aug 16–19

|812 (LV)

| –

|38%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| 1%

| 1%

| 1%{{efn|"Another third party/write-in" 1%}}

| 9%

style="text-align:left;"|Civiqs/Rust Belt Rising{{Cite web|url=https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/20200821_MIOHPAWI.pdf|title=Civiqs/Rust Belt Rising|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200913072203/https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/20200821_MIOHPAWI.pdf |archive-date=September 13, 2020 }}{{efn-ua|name=rustbelt}}

|Aug 13–17

|631 (RV)

| –

|46%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

| -

| -

| 3%{{efn|name="SE3"}}

| 1%

style="text-align:left;"|Morning Consult

| Aug 7–16

| 1,212 (LV)

|± (2%–4%)

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC{{Cite web|url=https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/restoration/pages/448/attachments/original/1599254878/Banner_August2020_08-17-2020.pdf|title=Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC}}{{efn-ua|name=restoration}}

| Aug 11–15

|600 (LV)

| –

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

| –

|7%

style="text-align:left;"|Change Research/CNBC{{Cite web |last= |first= |date=August 12, 2020 |title=States of Play: Battleground & National Likely Voter Surveys on COVID-19, the economy, and schools |url=https://changeresearch.com/states-of-play-battleground-wave-11/ |website=Change Research}}

|Aug 7–9

|413 (LV)

| –

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|YouGov/University of Wisconsin-Madison{{Cite web|url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fqH-jLCyrO5lZ6Mugvj_77fXDc9aVHtc/view|title=erc_crosstabs_2_final.pdf|website=Google Docs}}

|Jul 27 – Aug 6

|761 (RV)

|± 5.1%

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|47%

| -

| -

|5%{{efn|"Other" with 3%; would not vote with 2%}}

|6%

style="text-align:left;"|GQR Research/Unite the Country PAC{{Cite web|url=https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/20200818_MI.pdf|title=GQR Research/Unite the Country PAC|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200831151242/https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/20200818_MI.pdf |archive-date=August 31, 2020 }}{{efn-ua|Unite the Country PAC has endorsed Biden's presidential campaign}}

|Jul 30 – Aug 4

|1,245 (LV)

| –

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|David Binder Research{{Cite web|url=https://www.focusonruralamerica.com/2020/08/06/heartland-poll-biden-leads-in-midwest/|title=Heartland Poll Release: Biden Leads in Midwest|date=August 6, 2020}}

|Jul 30–31

|200 (LV)

| –

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|SurveyMonkey/Axios

|Jul 1–31

|3,083 (LV)

| –

|48%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

| -

| -

| –

|2%

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA{{Cite web|url=https://www.woodtv.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/51/2020/08/JULY-2020_EPIC-MRA-SURVEY.pdf|title=EPIC-MRA}}

|Jul 25–30

|600 (LV)

|± 4.0%

|40%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

| 3%

| -

| -

|6%

style="text-align:left;"|Public Policy Polling/Progress Michigan{{Cite web|url=https://progressmichigan.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Michigan-Results-August.pdf|title=Public Policy Polling/Progress Michigan}}{{efn-ua|name=ProgressMI}}

|Jul 28–29

|876 (V)

| –

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

| -

| -

|6%{{efn|"Third party" with 6%}}

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|Change Research/CNBC{{Cite web |last= |first= |date=July 29, 2020 |title=States of Play: Battleground & National Likely Voter Surveys on COVID-19, Vaccines, and Economic Relief |url=https://changeresearch.com/states-of-play-battleground-wave-10/ |website=Change Research}}{{Cite web|url=https://changeresearch.com/post/states-of-play-battleground-wave-10|title=States of Play: Battleground & National Surveys on COVID-19, Vaccines, and Economic Relief|date=August 6, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200806112252/https://changeresearch.com/post/states-of-play-battleground-wave-10 |archive-date=August 6, 2020 }}

|Jul 24–26

|413 (LV)

| –

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|46%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Morning Consult{{Cite web|url=https://morningconsult.com/form/july-presidential-battleground-state-polling/|title=Extensive New Battleground Polling Shows Biden Gaining Ground|website=Morning Consult}}

|Jul 17–26

|1,320 (LV)

|± 2.7%

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|YouGov/CBS{{Cite web|url=https://accounts.google.com/v3/signin/identifier?continue=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.google.com%2Ffile%2Fd%2F1Ohx4niA_F_s-Lrn9Dsr79Gu4kwhX8x6U%2Fview&followup=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.google.com%2Ffile%2Fd%2F1Ohx4niA_F_s-Lrn9Dsr79Gu4kwhX8x6U%2Fview&ifkv=AXH0vVsadCCQDzyXEMymMc_fe8IAC7jeRVAcBjtg8o7uQKHm6Pn0Nn_A5gKw8hFjWh1S7zBhIitrlg&osid=1&passive=1209600&service=wise&flowName=GlifWebSignIn&flowEntry=ServiceLogin&dsh=S1294604781%3A1742431583786511|title=Google Drive: Sign-in|website=accounts.google.com}}

|Jul 21–24

|1,156 (LV)

|± 3.4%

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

| -

| -

|2%{{efn|"Someone else/third party" with 2%; would not vote with 0%}}

|7%

style="text-align:left;"|Redfield & Wilton Strategies{{Cite web|url=https://redfieldandwiltonstrategies.com/latest-usa-swing-state-voting-intention-19-to-24-july/|title=Latest USA Swing State Voting Intention (19 to 24 July)|date=July 30, 2020}}

|Jul 19–24

|811 (LV)

| –

|37%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

| 1%

| 1%

|2%{{efn|"Another Third Party/Write-In" with 2%}}

|10%

style="text-align:left;"|CNN/SSRS{{Cite web|url=https://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2020/images/07/26/rel1_mi.pdf|title=CNN/SSRS}}

|Jul 18–24

|927 (RV)

|± 3.8%

|40%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|52%

| -

| -

|5%{{efn|"Other" with 1%; "Neither" with 4%}}

|2%

style="text-align:left;"|Gravis Marketing{{Cite web|url=https://fr.scribd.com/document/470277505/Michigan-July-23-2020-2020#fullscreen&from_embed|title=Michigan (July 23, 2020) 2020 | PDF | White Americans | Race And Ethnicity In The United States Census|website=Scribd}}{{Cite web|url=https://gravismarketing.com/michigan-poll-results/|title=Michigan Poll Results - Gravis|date=July 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200724191132/https://gravismarketing.com/michigan-poll-results/ |archive-date=July 24, 2020 }}

|Jul 22

|754 (RV)

|± 3.6%

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

| -

| -

| –

|7%

style="text-align:left;"|Fox News{{Cite web|url=https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2020/07/Fox_July-18-20-2020_Complete_Michigan_Topline_July-23-Release.pdf|title=Fox News}}

|Jul 18–20

|756 (RV)

|± 3.5%

|40%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

| -

| -

|4%{{efn|"Other" with 3%; would not vote with 1%}}

|7%

style="text-align:left;"|Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC{{Cite web|url=https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/restoration/pages/448/attachments/original/1596556627/Banners_MI_July2020_07-17-2020.pdf|title=Wayback Machine|website=d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net}}{{efn-ua|name=restoration}}

|Jul 13–16

|600 (LV)

|± 4.0%

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|53%

| -

| -

| –

|7%

style="text-align:left;"|Spry Strategies/American Principles Project{{Cite web|url=https://americanprinciplesproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/APP.Michigan.pdf|title=Spry Strategies/American Principles Project}}{{efn-ua|This poll's sponsor is the American Principles Project, a 501(c)(4) organization that supports the Republican Party.}}

|Jul 11–16

|600 (LV)

|± 3.7%

|{{party shading/Republican}}|50%

|45%

| -

| -

| –

|5%

style="text-align:left;"|Change Research/CNBC{{Cite web |last= |first= |date=July 15, 2020 |title=States of Play: Battleground & National Likely Voter Surveys on COVID-19, the Economy |url=https://changeresearch.com/states-of-play-battleground-wave-9/ |website=Change Research}}

|Jul 10–12

|824 (LV)

| –

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Public Policy Polling/Public Policy Polling/Giffords (D){{Cite web|url=https://giffords.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/MichiganResults2-1.pdf|title=Public Policy Polling/Giffords (D)}}{{efn-ua|Poll sponsored by Giffords, whose head - Gabby Giffords - had endorsed Biden prior to the sampling period}}

|Jul 9–10

|1,041 (V)

|± 3.2%

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

| -

| -

| –

|5%

style="text-align:left;"|SurveyMonkey/Axios

|Jun 8–30

|1,238 (LV)

| –

|46%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

| -

| -

| –

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|Change Research/CNBC{{Cite web |date=July 1, 2020 |title=States of Play: Battleground & National Surveys on COVID-19, Trump & the Economy |url=https://changeresearch.com/states-of-play-battleground-wave-8/ |website=Change Research}}

|Jun 26–28

|699 (LV){{efn|name=538data}}

| –

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Public Policy Polling/Public Policy Polling/Progress Michigan (D){{Cite web|url=https://progressmichigan.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/MichiganResults-july2020.pdf|title=Public Policy Polling/Progress Michigan (D)}}{{efn-ua|name=ProgressMI}}

|Jun 26–27

|1,237 (V)

| –

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| -

| -

|5%{{efn|"Would vote third party" with 5%}}

|1%

style="text-align:left;"|Hodas & Associates/Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC (R){{Cite web|url=https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/restoration/pages/448/attachments/original/1593026417/Banners_MI_June2020_06-22-2020_Crosstabs.pdf|title=Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC (R)}}

|Jun 17–20

|600 (LV)

|± 4.0%

|38%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|56%

| -

| -

|2%{{efn|"Refused" with 2%}}

|7%

style="text-align:left;"|Trafalgar Group{{Cite web|url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F4fied1xg_S7mIBdgHQHC1t98cYys2ez/view|title=MI Statewide Pres Full Report|website=Google Docs}}

|Jun 16–18

|1,101 (LV)

|± 2.95%

|45%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|46%

| -

| -

|5%{{efn|name="TPC5"}}

|4%

style="text-align:left;"|NYT Upshot/Siena College{{Cite web|url=https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/battleground-0625/6ca076db1919b722/full.pdf|title=NYT Upshot/Siena College}}

|Jun 8–17

|610 (RV)

|± 4.3%

|36%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|47%

| -

| -

|8%{{efn|"Another candidate" with 3%; Would not vote with 5%}}

|9%

style="text-align:left;"|Redfield & Wilton Strategies{{Cite web|url=https://redfieldandwiltonstrategies.com/latest-usa-swing-state-voting-intention-14-to-19-june/|title=Latest USA Swing State Voting Intention (14 to 19 June)|date=June 25, 2020}}

|Jun 14–16

|826 (LV)

|± 3.41%

|36%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|47%

| 2%

| 1%

|2%{{efn|"other" with 2%}}

|12%

style="text-align:left;"|TargetPoint{{Cite web|url=https://www.detroitchamber.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Keep-Michigan-Healthy-and-Working-Study-Topline-F2.pdf|title=TargetPoint|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200729203350/https://www.detroitchamber.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Keep-Michigan-Healthy-and-Working-Study-Topline-F2.pdf |archive-date=July 29, 2020 }}

|Jun 11–16

|1,000 (A)

| –

|33%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

| -

| -

|4%{{efn|"Refused/no answer" with 4%}}

|14%

style="text-align:left;"|Change Research/CNBC{{Cite web |last= |first= |date=June 17, 2020 |title=States of Play: Battleground & National Likely Voter Surveys on The Economy, COVID-19 & Racism |url=https://changeresearch.com/states-of-play-battleground-states-of-play-battleground-wave-7-d65/ |website=Change Research}}

|Jun 12–14

| 353 (LV){{efn|name=538data}}

| –

|45%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|47%

| -

| -

|3%{{efn|"Libertarian Party candidate/Green Party candidate" with 3%}}

| –

style="text-align:left;"|TIPP/American Greatness PAC[https://kittyhawk.amgreatness.com/app/uploads/2020/06/Michigan-Crosstabs-June-2020-1.pdf TIPP/American Greatness PAC] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200616111557/https://kittyhawk.amgreatness.com/app/uploads/2020/06/Michigan-Crosstabs-June-2020-1.pdf |date=June 16, 2020 }}{{efn-ua|name=amgreatness}}

|Jun 9–12

|859 (LV)

| –

|38%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

| -

| -

|4%{{efn|"Other" with 4%; "prefer not to answer" with 0%}}

|7%

style="text-align:left;"|Kiaer Research{{Cite web|url=https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e111a934eae7b3046095283/t/5edfa962ec4d69061a960910/1591716195220/Kiaer+Research+Poll+May-June+2020+-+Press+Release.pdf|title=Kiaer Research}}

|May 31 – Jun 7

|543 (LV)

|± 6.4%

|35%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| -

| -

|6%{{efn|"A different candidate" with 6%}}

|8%

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA{{Cite web|url=https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/06/16/michigan-poll-biden-trump/3190077001/|title=Second Michigan poll shows Trump even farther behind, with Biden leading by 16 points|first=Todd|last=Spangler|website=Detroit Free Press}}

|May 31 – Jun 4

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|39%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|55%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA{{Cite web|url=https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/06/07/michigan-poll-biden-leading-trump-12-points/3153501001/|title=Joe Biden has doubled his lead over Donald Trump in Michigan, poll says|first=Paul|last=Egan|website=Detroit Free Press}}

|May 30 – Jun 3

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|53%

| -

| -

| –

|6%{{efn|name="inclRefu"}}

style="text-align:left;"|Change Research/CNBC{{Cite web |first= |date=June 2, 2020 |title=States of Play: Battleground Survey on COVID-19 |url=https://changeresearch.com/states-of-play-battleground-wave-6/ |website=Change Research}}

|May 29–31

| 620 (LV){{efn|name=538data}}

| –

|46%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

| -

| -

|3%

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|Public Policy Polling/Progress Michigan{{Cite web|url=https://progressmichigan.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/LE-Newsletter-Issue3.pdf|title=Public Policy Polling/Progress Michigan}}{{efn-ua|name=ProgressMI}}

|May 29–30

|1,582 (V)

|± 2.5%

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| -

| -

|4%{{efn|"Third party" with 4%}}

|2%

style="text-align:left;"|Morning Consult

|May 17–26

|1,325 (LV)

| –

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Public Policy Polling/Protect Our Care{{Cite web|url=https://www.protectourcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Michigan-Polling-Results-5.20.20.pdf|title=Public Policy Polling/Protect Our Care}}{{efn-ua|Protect Our Care is a pro-Affordable Care Act organization}}

|May 18–19

|1,234 (V)

|± 2.8%

|45%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|51%

| -

| -

| –

|5%

style="text-align:left;"|Change Research/Crooked Media{{Cite web|url=https://crooked.com/articles/michigan-2020-pollercoaster/|title=PollerCoaster 2020: What's Going On In Michigan}}

|May 11–17

|3,070 (LV)

| –

| 46%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Redfield & Wilton Strategies{{Cite web|url=https://redfieldandwiltonstrategies.com/the-story-in-six-swing-states/|title=The Story in Six Swing States|date=May 21, 2020}}

|May 10–14

|970 (LV)

|± 3.2%

|39%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|47%

| -

| -

|3%{{efn|"Third party/write-in" with 3%}}

|11%

style="text-align:left;"|Hodas & Associates/Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC (R){{Cite web|url=https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/restoration/pages/448/attachments/original/1589465664/restoration_pac_michigan_toplines_may2020.pdf|title=Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC (R)}}

| May 1–5

| 600 (LV)

| ± 3%

| 42%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| -

| -

| –

| 8%

style="text-align:left;"|Public Policy Polling{{Cite web|url=https://progressmichigan.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Lake-Effect-Poll-April.pdf|title=Public Policy Polling}}{{efn-ua|Poll sponsored by Progress Michigan, the Michigan branch of Progress Now, a progressive advocacy organization}}

| Apr 28–29

| 1,270 (V)

| –

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| -

| -

| –

|8%

style="text-align:left;"|Public Policy Polling{{Cite web|url=https://www.protectourcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/MichiganResults1.pdf|title=Public Policy Polling}}{{efn-ua|Poll sponsored by Protect Our Care, a pro-Affordable Care Act organization}}

| Apr 20–21

| 1,277 (RV)

| –

| 44%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 51%

| -

| -

| –

| 5%

style="text-align:left;"|Fox News{{Cite web|url=https://www.scribd.com/document/457806519/Fox-News-Poll-April-18-21-2020#from_embed|title=Fox News Poll April 18-21, 2020 | PDF | Opinion Poll | Republican Party (United States)|website=Scribd}}

| Apr 18–21

| 801 (RV)

| ± 3.5%

| 41%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 49%

| -

| -

| 3%

| 6%

style="text-align:left;"|Ipsos/Reuters{{Cite web|url=https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/editorcharts/jznvnwawplm/|title=Battle for the rustbelt|website=Reuters}}

| Apr 15–20

| 612 (RV)

| ± 5.0%

| 38%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 46%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Hodas & Associates/Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC (R){{Cite web|url=https://login.nationbuilder.com/u/login?state=hqFo2SBVRy0xMnBSYTFiLW96azB1RVRFVEkyRDE4VTBNSEFHM6Fur3VuaXZlcnNhbC1sb2dpbqN0aWTZIDk1WWJhbGQxVlZ6cllGTVU4al85aFpaSXNtbnNRbW5No2NpZNkgME9PUE9Fem1YSFZjS2swV1phb0Z2bEI1cmM5M1BidHGlb3JnaWS0b3JnX09Zd3ZrdUtaSnJyeXdaQ3Knb3JnbmFtZa9yZXN0b3JhdGlvbi1vcmc&ui_locales=en|title=Log in | Restoration PAC|website=login.nationbuilder.com}}

| Apr 9–11

| 600 (RV)

| ± 3.0%

| 43%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 49%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Hart Research/CAP Action{{Cite web |url=https://cdn.americanprogressaction.org/content/uploads/sites/2/2020/04/13082915/FI12875-National-States-11.pdf |title=Hart Research/CAP Action |access-date=April 13, 2020 |archive-date=April 13, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200413191659/https://cdn.americanprogressaction.org/content/uploads/sites/2/2020/04/13082915/FI12875-National-States-11.pdf |url-status=dead }}{{efn-ua|CAP Action is a political advocacy group that exclusively supports Democratic candidates}}

| Apr 6–8

| 303 (RV)

| –

| 41%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 50%

| -

| -

| 4%

| 5%

style="text-align:left;"|Public Policy Polling{{Cite web|url=https://progressmichigan.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/LE-Newsletter-Issue1.pdf|title=Public Policy Polling}}

| Mar 31 – Apr 1

| 1,019 (RV)

| ± 3.1%

| 45%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 48%

| -

| -

| –

| 7%

style="text-align:left;"|SPRY Strategies{{Cite web|url=https://americanprinciplesproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Michigan-April-2020-Poll.pdf|title=SPRY Strategies}}

|Mar 30 – Apr 1

|602 (LV)

|± 4.0%

|46%

|46%

| -

| -

|–

|8%

style="text-align:left;"|Baldwin Wallace University Great Lakes{{Cite web|url=https://www.bw.edu/Assets/community-research-institute/03-2020_great_lakes_poll_ii%20final.pdf|title=Baldwin Wallace University Great Lakes}}

| Mar 17–25

| 997 (RV)

| ± 3.7%

| 42%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 47%

| -

| -

| –

| 11%

style="text-align:left;"|Change Research{{Cite web|url=https://rustbeltrising.com/files/March2020RBRpoll.pdf|title=Change Research}}

|Mar 21–23

|510 (LV)

| –

|47%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

| -

| -

| colspan="2" | 5%

style="text-align:left;"|Marketing Resource Group{{Cite web|url=https://www.mrgmi.com/2020/03/25/ballot-test-race-for-the-white-house-within-the-margin-of-error-with-biden-on-top/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20200325171513/https://www.mrgmi.com/2020/03/25/ballot-test-race-for-the-white-house-within-the-margin-of-error-with-biden-on-top/|url-status=dead|title=Marketing Resource Group|archivedate=March 25, 2020}}

|Mar 16–20

|600 (LV)

|± 4.0%

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|44%

| -

| -

| 9%{{efn|"Someone else" with 6%; "Refused" and would not vote with 1%}}

| 6%

style="text-align:left;"|Hodas & Associates/Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC (R){{Cite web|url=https://www.restorationofamerica.com/reelection_index_release|title= Trump Re-Election Index Press Release|website=www.restorationofamerica.com|access-date=March 27, 2020|archive-date=December 1, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201201111949/https://www.restorationofamerica.com/reelection_index_release|url-status=dead}}

|Mar 12–16

| 600 (RV)

| –

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|AtlasIntel{{Cite web|url=https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/20200309_MI.pdf|title=AtlasIntel|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200518174620/https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/20200309_MI.pdf |archive-date=May 18, 2020 }}

|Mar 7–9

|1,100 (RV)

|± 3.0%

|{{party shading/Republican}}|46%

|44%

| -

| -

| 10%

| –

style="text-align:left;"|YouGov/Yahoo News{{Cite web|url=https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/fwvdnnbigm/20200308_yahoo_primary_crosstabs.pdf|title=YouGov/Yahoo News}}

|Mar 6–8

|566 (RV)

| –

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|45%

| -

| -

|6%{{efn|"Other" with 4%; would not vote with 2%}}

|7%

style="text-align:left;"|Monmouth University{{Cite web|url=https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/monmouthpoll_MI_030920/|title=Biden Holds Primary Lead; Dems Have Edge in General|first=400 Cedar Avenue West Long Branch|last=NJ 07764571-3400|date=March 9, 2020}}

|Mar 5–8

|977 (RV)

|± 3.1%

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

| -

| -

| 2%

| 9%

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus{{Cite web|url=https://firehousestrategies.com/analysis/december_2019_battleground_survey/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20191209190423/https://firehousestrategies.com/analysis/december_2019_battleground_survey/|url-status=dead|title=Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus|archivedate=December 9, 2019}}

|Mar 5–7

|550 (RV)

|± 5.3%

|{{party shading/Republican}}|46%

|44%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|YouGov{{Cite web|url=https://news.wisc.edu/battleground-state-poll-1/|title=Battleground state poll shows Sanders leading in Democratic primary, tight general election matchups|website=news.wisc.edu}}

|Feb 11–20

|1,249 (RV)

|± 4.0%

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|47%

| -

| -

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Quinnipiac University{{Cite web|url=https://poll.qu.edu/2020-presidential-swing-state-polls/release-detail?ReleaseID=3656|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20200513025805/https://poll.qu.edu/2020-presidential-swing-state-polls/release-detail?ReleaseID=3656|url-status=dead|title=Quinnipiac University|archivedate=May 13, 2020}}

|Feb 12–18

|845 (RV)

|± 3.4%

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|47%

| -

| -

|6%{{efn|"Someone else" with 2%; would not vote with 4%|name="SE2WNV4"}}

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|Expedition Strategies/Progressive Policies Institute{{Cite web|url=https://www.progressivepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/PPI_SwingVoterPoll_Feb2020.pdf|title=Expedition Strategies/Progressive Policies Institute}}

| Feb 6–18

| 500 (RV)

| –

| 43%

| 43%

| -

| -

| –

| 14%

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA/Detroit Free Press{{Cite web|url=https://ssl2002.webhosting.comcast.net/epic-mra/press/Stwd_Survey_Jan2020_Media_Freq.pdf|title=EPIC-MRA/Detroit Free Press}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/01/15/mike-bloomberg-other-democrats-lead-donald-trump-michigan-poll/4469175002/|title=Mike Bloomberg holds 7-point lead on Trump in Michigan, poll shows|first=Todd|last=Spangler|website=Detroit Free Press}}

| Jan 9–12

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4%

| 44%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| -

| -

| –

| 6%

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group Inc.{{Cite web|url=https://www.scribd.com/document/442183414/January-2020-Statewide-Survey|title=January 2020 Statewide Survey | PDF | Bernie Sanders | Democratic Party (United States)|website=Scribd}}

| Jan 3–7

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4%

| 43%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 50%

| -

| -

| –

| 5%

==2017–2019 polls==

class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="text-align:center;font-size:90%;line-height:17px"

! Poll source

! Date(s)
administered

! Sample
size{{efn|name=key}}

! Margin
{{nowrap|of error}}

! class="unsortable" | Donald
Trump

{{nobold|Republican}}

! class="unsortable" |Joe
Biden

{{nobold|Democratic}}

! class="unsortable" |Other

! class="unsortable" |Undecided

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus

| Dec 3–5, 2019

| 551 (LV)

| ± 4.3%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|46%

| 41%

| 8%{{efn|A third party candidate with 5%; would not vote with 3%|name="TPC5WNV3"}}

| 5%{{efn|name="inclRefu"}}

style="text-align:left;"|Emerson College{{Cite web|url=https://emersonpolling.reportablenews.com/pr/michigan-2020-democrats-aim-to-take-back-the-state|title=Emerson Polling - Michigan 2020: Democrats Aim to Take Back the State|website=emersonpolling.reportablenews.com}}

| Oct 31 – Nov 3, 2019

| 1,051 (RV)

| ± 3.0%

| 44%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 56%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|NYT Upshot/Siena College{{Cite web|url=https://github.com/ndcohn/battleground-poll-2019/blob/master/MI110419%20Crosstabs.pdf|title=battleground-poll-2019/MI110419 Crosstabs.pdf at master · ndcohn/battleground-poll-2019 · GitHub|website=GitHub }}

| Oct 13–25, 2019

| 501 (LV)

| ± 5.1%

| 44%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|45%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Target Insyght{{Cite web|url=https://twitter.com/MIRSnews/status/1178868336211431424|title=Target Insyght}}

| Sep 24–26, 2019

| 800 (LV)

| –

| 35%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 54%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus{{Cite web|url=http://firehousestrategies.com/exclusive-survey-democrats-lead-trump-in-key-swing-states/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20190912235454/http://firehousestrategies.com/exclusive-survey-democrats-lead-trump-in-key-swing-states/|url-status=dead|title=EXCLUSIVE SURVEY: Democrats Lead Trump in Key Swing States - FIREHOUSE Strategies|date=September 12, 2019|archivedate=September 12, 2019}}

| Sep 7–9, 2019

| 529 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 41%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 42%

| 17%

| –

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA{{Cite web|url=https://www.woodtv.com/news/elections/mi-poll-dems-top-trump-but-undecideds-could-tip-scale/|title=MI poll: Dems top Trump, but undecideds could tip scale | WOODTV.com}}

| Aug 17–21, 2019

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 41%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 51%

| –

| 8%

style="text-align:left;" |Climate Nexus{{Cite web|url=https://climatenexus.org/wp-content/uploads/Michigan-Poll-Toplines-PR1916.pdf|title=Climate Nexus|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191208172620/https://climatenexus.org/wp-content/uploads/Michigan-Poll-Toplines-PR1916.pdf |archive-date=December 8, 2019 }}

| Jul 14–17, 2019

| 820 (RV)

| ± 4.0%

| 36%

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |49%

| 5%{{efn|Would not vote with 5%}}

| 10%

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus{{Cite web|url=http://firehousestrategies.com/june-2020-survey/|title=NEW SURVEY: Battleground States Up for Grabs|date=June 16, 2019|website=Firehouse Strategies}}

| Jun 11–13, 2019

| 587 (LV)

| ± 4.2%

| 43%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 46%

| 11%

| –

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA{{Cite web|url=https://ssl2002.webhosting.comcast.net/epic-mra/press/Stwd_Survey_June2019_Media_Freq.pdf|title=EPIC-MRA}}

| Jun 8–12, 2019

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 41%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 52%

| –

| 7%

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group{{Cite web|url=https://www.scribd.com/document/412276550/June-2019-Statewide-Survey|title=June 2019 Statewide Survey | PDF | Democratic Party (United States) | American Government|website=Scribd}}

| May 28–30, 2019

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 41%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 53%

| –

| 4%

style="text-align:left;"|WPA Intelligence{{Cite web|url=https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/315134/gop-poll-reassuring-for-trump-in-key-states-but-offers-warning-about-michigan/|title=GOP poll reassuring for Trump in key states but offers warning about Michigan - Washington Examiner|first=David M.|last=Drucker|date=May 11, 2019}}

| Apr 27–30, 2019

| 200 (LV)

| ± 6.9%

| 42%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 45%

| –

| 12%

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus{{Cite web|url=http://firehousestrategies.com/2020battlegroundsurvey/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20190403182858/http://firehousestrategies.com/2020battlegroundsurvey/|url-status=dead|title=Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus|archivedate=April 3, 2019}}

| Mar 19–21, 2019

| 530 (LV)

| ± 4.5%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 46%

| 45%

| 4%

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Emerson College{{Cite web|url=http://emersonpolling.com/2019/03/10/michigan-2020-primary-biden-with-strong-lead-but-sanders-waiting-in-the-wings/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20190310193324/http://emersonpolling.com/2019/03/10/michigan-2020-primary-biden-with-strong-lead-but-sanders-waiting-in-the-wings/|url-status=dead|title=Emerson College|archivedate=March 10, 2019}}

| Mar 7–10, 2019

| 743 (RV)

| ± 3.5%

| 46%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 54%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group{{Cite web|url=https://www.clickondetroit.com/michigan-politics/wdivdetroit-news-poll-trump-faces-uphill-re-election-battle-in-michigan|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20190422075003/https://www.clickondetroit.com/michigan-politics/wdivdetroit-news-poll-trump-faces-uphill-re-election-battle-in-michigan|url-status=dead|title=Glengariff Group|archivedate=April 22, 2019}}

| Jan 24–26, 2019

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 40%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 53%

| –

| 5%

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA{{Cite web|url=https://ssl2002.webhosting.comcast.net/epic-mra/press/Stwd_Survey_Apr2018_Media_Freq.pdf|title=EPIC-MRA}}

| Apr 28–30, 2018

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 39%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 52%

| –

| 9%

style="text-align:left;"|Zogby Analytics{{Cite web|url=https://zogbyanalytics.com/soundbites/808-poll-kid-rock-riding-trump-train-to-us-senate-leads-gop-field|title=Zogby Analytics - Poll: Kid Rock riding 'Trump Train' to US Senate, leads GOP field|website=zogbyanalytics.com}}

| Sep 2017

| 800 (V)

| –

| 35%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 52%

| –

| 13%

{{collapse top|1=Former candidates|left=yes|bg=#B0CEFF;line-height:135%;|border=none}}

Donald Trump vs. Michael Bloomberg

class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%;text-align:center;"
valign=bottom style="font-size:90%;"

! Poll source

! Date(s)
administered

! Sample
size{{efn|name=key}}

! Margin
{{nowrap|of error}}

! Donald
Trump (R)

! Michael
Bloomberg (D)

! Other

! Undecided

style="text-align:left;"|Quinnipiac University

|Feb 12–18, 2020

|845 (RV)

|±3.4%

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|47%

|7%{{efn|"Someone else" with 3%; would not vote with 4%|name="SE3WNV4"}}

|4%

style="text-align:left;"|Expedition Strategies/Progressive Policies Institute

| Feb 6–18, 2020

| 500 (RV)

| –

| 41%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|46%

| –

| 13%

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA/Detroit Free Press[https://eu.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/01/15/mike-bloomberg-other-democrats-lead-donald-trump-michigan-poll/4469175002/]

| Jan 9–12, 2020

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4%

| 42%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

| –

| 9%

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group Inc.

| Jan 3–7, 2020

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4%

| 41%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 47%

| –

| 10%

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus

| Dec 3–5, 2019

| 551 (LV)

| ± 4.3%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|48%

| 37%

| 8%{{efn|name="TPC5WNV3"}}

| 7%{{efn|name="inclRefu"}}

Donald Trump vs. Cory Booker

class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%;text-align:center;"
valign="bottom" style="font-size:90%;"

! Poll source

! Date(s)
administered

! Sample
size{{efn|name=key}}

! Margin
{{nowrap|of error}}

! Donald
Trump (R)

! Cory
Booker (D)

! Other

! Undecided

style="text-align:left;" |Climate Nexus

| Jul 14–17, 2019

| 820 (RV)

| ± 4.0%

| 37%

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |39%

| 7%{{efn|Would not vote with 7%|name="WNV7"}}

| 16%

Donald Trump vs. Pete Buttigieg

class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%;text-align:center;"
valign=bottom style="font-size:90%;"

! Poll source

! Date(s)
administered

! Sample
size{{efn|name=key}}

! Margin
{{nowrap|of error}}

! Donald
Trump (R)

! Pete
Buttigieg (D)

! Other

! Undecided

style="text-align:left;"|YouGov

|Feb 11–20, 2020

|1,249 (RV)

|±4.0%

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|47%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Quinnipiac University

|Feb 12–18, 2020

|845 (RV)

|±3.4%

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|45%

|8%{{efn|"Someone else" with 3%; would not vote with 5%}}

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|Expedition Strategies/Progressive Policies Institute

| Feb 6–18, 2020

| 500 (RV)

| –

| 40%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|44%

| –

| 15%

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA/Detroit Free Press[https://eu.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/01/15/mike-bloomberg-other-democrats-lead-donald-trump-michigan-poll/4469175002/]

| Jan 9–12, 2020

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4%

| 43%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|47%

| –

| 10%

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group Inc.

| Jan 3–7, 2020

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4%

| 43%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 45%

| –

| 10%

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus

| Dec 3–5, 2019

| 551 (LV)

| ± 4.3%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|48%

| 37%

| 8%{{efn|A third party candidate with 4%; would not vote with 4%}}

| 6%{{efn|name="inclRefu"}}

style="text-align:left;" |Climate Nexus

| Jul 14–17, 2019

| 820 (RV)

| ± 4.0%

| 37%

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |39%

| 7%{{efn|name="WNV7"}}

| 16%

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus

| Jun 11–13, 2019

| 587 (LV)

| ± 4.2%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 44%

| 40%

| 16%

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group

| May 28–30, 2019

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 41%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 47%

| –

| 11%

Donald Trump vs. Kamala Harris

class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%;text-align:center;"
valign=bottom style="font-size:90%;"

! Poll source

! Date(s)
administered

! Sample
size{{efn|name=key}}

! Margin
{{nowrap|of error}}

! Donald
Trump (R)

! Kamala
Harris (D)

! Other

! Undecided

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA

| Aug 17–21, 2019

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 43%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 46%

| –

| 11%

style="text-align:left;" |Climate Nexus

| Jul 14–17, 2019

| 820 (RV)

| ± 4.0%

| 38%

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |41%

| 6%{{efn|Would not vote with 6%|name="WNV6"}}

| 14%

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group

| May 28–30, 2019

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 44%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 47%

| –

| 9%

style="text-align:left;"|Emerson College

| Mar 7–10, 2019

| 743 (RV)

| ± 3.5%

| 49%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 51%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group

| Jan 24–26, 2019

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 42%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 47%

| –

| 10%

Donald Trump vs. Amy Klobuchar

class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%;text-align:center;"
valign=bottom style="font-size:90%;"

! Poll source

! Date(s)
administered

! Sample
size{{efn|name=key}}

! Margin
{{nowrap|of error}}

! Donald
Trump (R)

! Amy
Klobuchar (D)

! Other

! Undecided

style="text-align:left;"|YouGov

|Feb 11–20, 2020

|1,249 (RV)

|± 4.0%

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|44%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Quinnipiac University

|Feb 12–18, 2020

|845 (RV)

|± 3.4%

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|45%

|6%{{efn|name="SE2WNV4"}}

|4%

style="text-align:left;"|Emerson College

| Mar 7–10, 2019

| 743 (RV)

| ± 3.5%

| 47%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 53%

| –

| –

Donald Trump vs. Beto O'Rourke

class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%;text-align:center;"
valign=bottom style="font-size:90%;"

! Poll source

! Date(s)
administered

! Sample
size{{efn|name=key}}

! Margin
{{nowrap|of error}}

! Donald
Trump (R)

! Beto
O'Rourke (D)

! Other

! Undecided

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus

| Mar 19–21, 2019

| 530 (LV)

| ± 4.5%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 48%

| 39%

| 8%

| –

Donald Trump vs. Bernie Sanders

class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%;text-align:center;"
valign=bottom style="font-size:90%;"

! Poll source

! Date(s)
administered

! Sample
size{{efn|name=key}}

! Margin
{{nowrap|of error}}

! Donald
Trump (R)

! Bernie
Sanders (D)

! Other

! Undecided

style="text-align:left;"|Baldwin Wallace University Great Lakes

| Mar 17–25, 2020

| 997 (RV)

| ± 3.7%

| 42%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 45%

| –

| 13%

style="text-align:left;"|Hodas & Associates/Hodas & Associates/Restoration PAC (R)

|Mar 12–16, 2020

| 600 (RV)

| –

|44%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|49%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|AtlasIntel

|Mar 7–9, 2020

|1,100 (RV)

|± 3.0%

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|46%

| 11%

| –

style="text-align:left;"|YouGov/Yahoo News

|Mar 6–8, 2020

|566 (RV)

| –

|42%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|43%

|7%{{efn|"Other" with 5%; would not vote with 2%}}

|8%

style="text-align:left;"|Monmouth University

|Mar 5–8, 2020

|977 (RV)

|± 3.1%

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|46%

| 2%

| 9%

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus

| Mar 5–7, 2020

|550 (RV)

|± 5.3%

|{{party shading/Republican}}|48%

|41%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|YouGov

|Feb 11–20, 2020

|1,249 (RV)

|± 4.0%

|41%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Quinnipiac University

|Feb 12–18, 2020

|845 (RV)

|± 3.4%

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

|7%{{efn|name="SE3WNV4"}}

|3%

style="text-align:left;"|Expedition Strategies/Progressive Policies Institute

| Feb 6–18, 2020

| 500 (RV)

| –

| 42%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|46%

| –

| 12%

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA/Detroit Free Press[https://eu.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/01/15/mike-bloomberg-other-democrats-lead-donald-trump-michigan-poll/4469175002/]

| Jan 9–12, 2020

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4%

| 45%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| –

| 5%

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group Inc.

| Jan 3–7, 2020

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4%

| 45%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 49%

| –

| 5%

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus

| Dec 3–5, 2019

| 551 (LV)

| ± 4.3%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|48%

| 42%

| 6%{{efn|A third party candidate with 4%; would not vote with 2%}}

| 5%{{efn|name="inclRefu"}}

style="text-align:left;"|Emerson College

| Oct 31 – Nov 3, 2019

| 1,051 (RV)

| ± 3.0%

| 43%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 57%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|NYT Upshot/Siena College

| Oct 13–25, 2019

| 501 (LV)

| ± 5.1%

| 42%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 46%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus

| Sep 7–9, 2019

| 529 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 43%

| 40%

| 17%

| –

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA

| Aug 17–21, 2019

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 44%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 48%

| –

| 8%

style="text-align:left;" |Climate Nexus

| Jul 14–17, 2019

| 820 (RV)

| ± 4.0%

| 38%

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |47%

| 4%{{efn|Would not vote with 4%}}

| 11%

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus

| Jun 11–13, 2019

| 587 (LV)

| ± 4.2%

|44%

|44%

| 12%

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group

| May 28–30, 2019

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 41%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 53%

| –

| 5%

style="text-align:left;"|Tulchin Research (D){{Cite web|url=https://tulchinresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Tulchin-Research-Memo-Sanders-Defeating-Trump-in-Industrial-Battleground-States-4-19-final.pdf|title=Tulchin Research (D)}}{{efn-ua|Poll sponsored by the Sanders campaign|name="Sanders"}}

| Apr 14–18, 2019

| 400 (LV)

| ± 4.9%

| 41%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 52%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus

| Mar 19–21, 2019

| 530 (LV)

| ± 4.5%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 46%

| 45%

| 6%

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Emerson College

| Mar 7–10, 2019

| 743 (RV)

| ± 3.5%

| 47%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 52%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group

| Jan 24–26, 2019

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 41%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 52%

| –

| 6%

style="text-align:left;"|Zogby Analytics

| Sep 2017

| 800 (V)

| –

| 36%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 54%

| –

| 10%

Donald Trump vs. Elizabeth Warren

class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%;text-align:center;"
valign=bottom style="font-size:90%;"

! Poll source

! Date(s)
administered

! Sample
size{{efn|name=key}}

! Margin
{{nowrap|of error}}

! Donald
Trump (R)

! Elizabeth
Warren (D)

! Other

! Undecided

style="text-align:left;"|YouGov

|Feb 11–20, 2020

|1,249 (RV)

|±4.0%

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|46%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Quinnipiac University

|Feb 12–18, 2020

|845 (RV)

|±3.4%

|43%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|45%

|7%{{efn|"Someone else" with 2%; would not vote with 5%}}

|4%

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA/Detroit Free Press[https://eu.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/01/15/mike-bloomberg-other-democrats-lead-donald-trump-michigan-poll/4469175002/]

| Jan 9–12, 2020

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4%

| 45%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|48%

| –

| 7%

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group Inc.

| Jan 3–7, 2020

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4%

| 44%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 46%

| –

| 8%

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus

| Dec 3–5, 2019

| 551 (LV)

| ± 4.3%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|47%

| 38%

| 8%{{efn|A third party candidate with 3%; would not vote with 5%}}

| 6%{{efn|name="inclRefu"}}

style="text-align:left;"|Emerson College

| Oct 31 – Nov 3, 2019

| 1,051 (RV)

| ± 3.0%

| 46%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 54%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|NYT Upshot/Siena College

| Oct 13–25, 2019

| 501 (LV)

| ± 5.1%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 45%

| 40%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus

| Sep 7–9, 2019

| 529 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 42%

| 41%

| 17%

| –

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA

| Aug 17–21, 2019

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 43%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 49%

| –

| 8%

style="text-align:left;" |Climate Nexus

| Jul 14–17, 2019

| 820 (RV)

| ± 4.0%

| 38%

| {{party shading/Democratic}} |44%

| 6%{{efn|name="WNV6"}}

| 12%

style="text-align:left;"|Firehouse Strategies/Øptimus

| Jun 11–13, 2019

| 587 (LV)

| ± 4.2%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 43%

| 41%

| 16%

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group

| May 28–30, 2019

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 43%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 47%

| –

| 9%

style="text-align:left;"|Emerson College

| Mar 7–10, 2019

| 743 (RV)

| ± 3.5%

| 49%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 51%

| –

| –

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group

| Jan 24–26, 2019

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 43%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 46%

| –

| 10%

style="text-align:left;"|Zogby Analytics

| Sep 2017

| 800 (V)

| –

| 37%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 46%

| –

| 17%

style="text-align:left;"|Zogby Analytics{{Cite web|url=https://zogbyanalytics.com/news/792-the-zogby-poll-trump-approval-trump-vs-warren-in-11-states|title=Zogby Analytics - The Zogby Poll: Trump approval/Trump Vs. Warren in 11 states|website=zogbyanalytics.com}}

| Aug 17–23, 2017

| 803 (LV)

| ± 3.5%

| 35%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 51%

| –

| 14%

{{collapse bottom}}

{{collapse top|1=Hypothetical polling|left=yes|bg=#B0CEFF;line-height:135%;|border=none}}

with Donald Trump, Joe Biden, and Justin Amash

class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%;text-align:center;"
valign=bottom style="font-size:90%;"

! Poll source

! Date(s)
administered

! Sample
size{{efn|name=key}}

! Margin
{{nowrap|of error}}

! Donald
Trump (R)

! Joe
Biden (D)

! Justin
Amash (L)

! Undecided

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group

| May 28–30, 2019

| 600 (LV)

| ± 4.0%

| 39%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 45%

| 10%

| 6%

with Donald Trump, Joe Biden, and Howard Schultz

class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%;text-align:center;"
valign=bottom style="font-size:90%;"

! Poll source

! Date(s)
administered

! Sample
size{{efn|name=key}}

! Margin
{{nowrap|of error}}

! Donald
Trump (R)

! Joe
Biden (D)

! Howard
Schultz (I)

! Undecided

style="text-align:left;"|Emerson College

| Mar 7–10, 2019

| 743 (RV)

| ± 3.5%

| 44%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 52%

| 4%

| –

with Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and Howard Schultz

class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%;text-align:center;"
valign=bottom style="font-size:90%;"

! Poll source

! Date(s)
administered

! Sample
size{{efn|name=key}}

! Margin
{{nowrap|of error}}

! Donald
Trump (R)

! Bernie
Sanders (D)

! Howard
Schultz (I)

! Undecided

style="text-align:left;"|Emerson College

| Mar 7–10, 2019

| 743 (RV)

| ± 3.5%

| 45%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 49%

| 6%

| –

with Donald Trump and Generic Democrat

class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%;text-align:center;"
valign=bottom style="font-size:90%;"

! Poll source

! Date(s)
administered

! Sample
size{{efn|name=key}}

! Margin
{{nowrap|of error}}

! Donald
Trump (R)

! Generic
Democrat (D)

! Undecided

style="text-align:left;"|Baldwin Wallace University/Oakland University/Ohio Northern University{{Cite web|url=https://www.bw.edu/Assets/community-research-institute/03-2020_great_lakes_poll_ii%20final.pdf|title=Baldwin Wallace University/Oakland University/Ohio Northern University}}

| Mar 17–25, 2020

| 997 (RV)

| ± 3.7%

| 43.2%{{efn|Figures for each candidate in this poll include undecided voters who were reported to lean towards that candidate at the time of polling.|name="Undecidedlean"}}

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|54.0%

| 2.9%{{efn|"It depends on who the Democrats nominate" with 1.9%; "unsure" with 1%}}

style="text-align:left;"|Expedition Strategies/Progressive Policies Institute

| Feb 6–18, 2020

| 500 (RV)

| –

| 38%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|50%

| 11%

style="text-align:left;"|Baldwin Wallace University/Oakland University/Ohio Northern University{{Cite web|url=https://www.bw.edu/Assets/community-research-institute/2020-great-lakes-poll-full-FINAL.pdf|title=Baldwin Wallace University/Oakland University/Ohio Northern University}}

| Jan 8–20, 2020

| 1,023 (RV)

| ± 3.1%

| 36.4%{{efn|name="Undecidedlean"}}

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|50.3%

| 13.3%

style="text-align:left;"|KFF/Cook Political Report{{Cite web|url=https://www.kff.org/other/report/blue-wall-voices-project/|title=Blue Wall Voices Project|first1=Ashley|last1=Kirzinger|first2=Cailey|last2=Muñana|first3=Mollyann|last3=Brodie|first4=Charlie|last4=Cook|first5=Amy|last5=Walter|first6=Jennifer|last6=Duffy|first7=David Wasserman|last7=Published|date=November 7, 2019}}

|Sep 23 – Oct 15, 2019

|767 (RV)

| ± 4%

|27%

|{{party shading/Democratic}}|39%

|25%

with Donald Trump and Generic Opponent

class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%;text-align:center;"
valign=bottom style="font-size:90%;"

! Poll source

! Date(s)
administered

! Sample
size{{efn|name=key}}

! Margin
{{nowrap|of error}}

! Donald
Trump (R)

! Generic
Opponent

! Undecided

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA

|Jul 25 - 30, 2020

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|37%

|{{party shading/Other}}|49%{{efn|Listed as "Would vote to replace Trump"|name="listReplace"}}

|14%

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA

|May 31 – Jun 4, 2020

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|33%

|{{party shading/Other}}|51%{{efn|name="listReplace"}}

|13%{{efn|Listed as "would consider voting for someone other than Trump"|name="listOther"}}

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA[https://eu.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/06/07/michigan-poll-biden-leading-trump-12-points/3153501001/]

|May 30 – Jun 3, 2020

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|38%

|{{party shading/Other}}|51%{{efn|name="listReplace"}}

|8%{{efn|name="listOther"}}

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA/Detroit Free Press[https://eu.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/01/15/mike-bloomberg-other-democrats-lead-donald-trump-michigan-poll/4469175002/]

|Jan 9–12, 2020

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|34%

|{{party shading/Other}}|44%{{efn|name="listReplace"}}

|22%{{efn|19% listed as "would consider voting for someone other than Trump"; 3% as "undecided/refused"}}

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA

|Jun 8–12, 2019

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|32%

|{{party shading/Other}}|45%{{efn|"Vote to replace Trump" with 45%}}

|23%{{efn|"Consider voting for someone else" with 19%; "Undecided/refused" with 4%}}

style="text-align:left;"|EPIC-MRA/Detroit Free Press{{Cite web|url=https://ssl2002.webhosting.comcast.net/epic-mra/press/Stwd_Survey_Mar2019_Media_Freq.pdf|title=EPIC-MRA/Detroit Free Press}}

|Mar 3–7, 2019

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|31%

|{{party shading/Other}}|49%{{efn|"Vote to replace Trump" with 49%}}

|20%{{efn|"Consider voting for someone else" with 16%; "Don't know/refused" with 4%}}

style="text-align:left;"|Glengariff Group/WDIV/Detroit News{{Cite web|url=https://www.clickondetroit.com/all-about-michigan/2019/01/29/wdivdetroit-news-poll-trump-faces-uphill-re-election-battle-in-michigan/|title=WDIV/Detroit News poll: Trump faces uphill re-election battle in Michigan|date=February 16, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200216234513/https://www.clickondetroit.com/all-about-michigan/2019/01/29/wdivdetroit-news-poll-trump-faces-uphill-re-election-battle-in-michigan/ |archive-date=February 16, 2020 }}{{Cite web|url=https://www.scribd.com/document/398401363/Michigan-Statewide-Survey-Jan-2019#from_embed|title=Michigan Statewide Survey Jan 2019 | PDF | Republican Party (United States) | American Government|website=Scribd}}

|Jan 24–26, 2019

|600 (LV)

|± 4%

|31%

|{{party shading/Other}}|53%

|15%{{efn|"Depends on who the Democratic nominee is" with 15%}}

{{collapse bottom}}

= Results =

File:Election 2020 Watch Function, 4 November 2020 (50567910881).jpg watch as the results from Michigan are released on CNN, 5 November 2020.]]{{Election box begin|title=2020 United States presidential election in Michigan{{cite web |url=https://mielections.us/election/results/2020GEN_CENR.html |title=2020 Michigan Official General Election Results – 11/03/2020 |website=Michigan Secretary of State |access-date=2020-11-23}}{{Cite web|title=2020 Presidential General Election Results - Michigan|url=https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?year=2020&fips=26&f=0&off=0&elect=0&minper=0|access-date=2020-11-30|website=Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections}}}}

{{Election box winning candidate with party link

| party = Democratic Party (United States)

| candidate = Joe Biden
Kamala Harris

| votes = 2,804,040

| percentage = 50.62%

| change = +3.35%

}}

{{Election box candidate with party link

| party = Republican Party (United States)

| candidate = Donald Trump
Mike Pence

| votes = 2,649,852

| percentage = 47.84%

| change = +0.34%

}}

{{Election box candidate with party link

| party = Libertarian Party (United States)

| candidate = Jo Jorgensen
Spike Cohen

| votes = 60,381

| percentage = 1.09%

| change = −2.50%

}}

{{Election box candidate with party link

| party = Green Party (United States)

| candidate = Howie Hawkins
Angela Walker

| votes = 13,718

| percentage = 0.25%

| change = −0.82%

}}

{{Election box candidate with party link

| party = US Taxpayers Party

| candidate = Don Blankenship
William Mohr

| votes = 7,235

| percentage = 0.13%

| change = N/A

}}

{{Election box candidate with party link

| party = Natural Law Party (United States)

| candidate = Rocky De La Fuente
Darcy Richardson

| votes = 2,986

| percentage = 0.05%

| change = N/A

}}

{{Election box candidate with party link

| party = Write-in

| candidate = Brian T. Carroll

| votes = 963

| percentage = 0.02%

| change = +0.01%

}}

{{Election box candidate with party link

| party = Write-in

| candidate = Jade Simmons

| votes = 89

| percentage = <0.01%

| change = N/A

}}

{{Election box candidate with party link

| party = Write-in

| candidate = Tom Hoefling

| votes = 32

| percentage = <0.01%

| change = N/A

}}

{{Election box write-in with party link

| votes = 6

| percentage = <0.01%

| change = N/A

}}

{{Election box total

| votes = 5,539,302

| percentage = 100.00%

| change =

}}

{{Election box end}}

== By county ==

{{Update|part=County results|date=December 2024|reason=County results needs to be fixed, totals aren't accurate when summed}}

width="60%" class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align:center"
style="text-align:center;" rowspan="2"| County

! style="text-align:center;" colspan="2"| Joe Biden
Democratic

! style="text-align:center;" colspan="2"| Donald Trump
Republican

! style="text-align:center;" colspan="2"| Various candidates
Other parties

! style="text-align:center;" colspan="2"| Margin

! style="text-align:center;" rowspan="2"| Total votes cast

style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| #

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| %

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| #

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| %

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| #

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| %

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| #

! style="text-align:center;" data-sort-type="number"| %

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Alcona

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 2,142

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 30.32%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 4,848

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 68.63%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 74

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.05%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −2,706

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −38.31%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 7,064

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Alger

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 2,053

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 39.98%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 3,014

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 58.70%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 68

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.32%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −961

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −18.72%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 5,135

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Allegan

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 24,449

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 36.39%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 41,392

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 61.60%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1,354

| {{party shading/Others}}| 2.01%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −16,943

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −25.21%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 67,195

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Alpena

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 6,000

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 35.32%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 10,686

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 62.91%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 301

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.77%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −4,686

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −27.59%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 16,987

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Antrim

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,960

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 37.32%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 9,748

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 61.03%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 264

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.65%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −3,788

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −23.71%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 15,972

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Arenac

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 2,774

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 31.38%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 5,928

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 67.07%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 137

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.55%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −3,154

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −35.69%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 8,839

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Baraga

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 1,478

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 36.52%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 2,512

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 62.07%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 57

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.41%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −1,034

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −25.55%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 4,047

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Barry

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 11,797

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 32.80%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 23,471

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 65.27%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 693

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.93%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −11,674

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −32.47%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 35,961

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Bay

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 26,151

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 43.34%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 33,125

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 54.90%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1,057

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.76%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −6,974

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −11.56%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 60,333

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Benzie

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,480

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 44.69%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 6,601

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 53.83%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 181

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.48%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −1,121

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −9.14%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 12,262

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Berrien

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 37,438

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 45.34%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 43,519

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 52.71%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1,608

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.95%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −6,081

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −7.37%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 82,565

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Branch

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 6,159

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 29.94%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 14,064

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 68.36%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 350

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.70%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −7,905

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −38.42%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 20,573

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Calhoun

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 28,877

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 43.57%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 36,221

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 54.65%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1,183

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.78%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −5,344

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −11.08%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 66,281

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Cass

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 9,130

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 34.79%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 16,699

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 63.63%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 413

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.58%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −7,569

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −28.84%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 26,242

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Charlevoix

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 6,939

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 40.75%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 9,841

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 57.79%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 250

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.46%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −2,902

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −17.04%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 17,030

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Cheboygan

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,437

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 34.22%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 10,186

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 64.10%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 267

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.68%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −4,749

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −29.88%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 15,890

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Chippewa

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 6,648

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 37.62%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 10,681

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 60.44%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 342

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.94%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −4,033

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −22.82%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 17,671

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Clare

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,199

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 31.91%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 10,861

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 66.65%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 235

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.44%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −5,662

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −34.74%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 16,295

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Clinton

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 21,968

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 45.84%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 25,098

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 52.37%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 861

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.79%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −3,130

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −6.53%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 47,927

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Crawford

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 2,672

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 33.99%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 5,087

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 64.71%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 102

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.30%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −2,415

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −30.72%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 7,861

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Delta

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 7,606

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 35.93%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 13,207

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 62.39%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 354

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.68%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −5,601

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −26.46%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 21,167

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Dickinson

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 4,744

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 32.46%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 9,617

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 65.80%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 254

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.74%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −4,873

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −33.34%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 14,615

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Eaton

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 31,299

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 48.66%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 31,798

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 49.43%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1,230

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.91%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −499

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −0.77%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 64,327

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Emmet

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 9,662

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 43.50%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 12,135

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 54.64%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 412

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.86%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −2,473

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −11.14%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 22,209

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| Genesee

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 119,390

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 53.84%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 98,714

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 44.51%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 3,660

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.65%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 20,676

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 9.33%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 221,764

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Gladwin

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 4,524

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 30.95%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 9,893

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 67.69%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 198

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.36%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −5,369

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −36.74%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 14,615

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Gogebic

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 3,570

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 43.14%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 4,600

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 55.58%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 106

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.28%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −1,030

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −12.44%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 8,276

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Grand Traverse

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 28,683

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 47.53%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 30,502

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 50.54%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1,168

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.93%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −1,819

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −3.01%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 60,353

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Gratiot

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 6,693

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 34.95%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 12,102

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 63.20%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 353

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.85%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −5,409

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −28.25%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 19,148

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Hillsdale

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,883

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 25.25%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 17,037

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 73.11%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 382

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.64%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −11,154

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −47.86%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 23,302

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Houghton

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 7,750

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 41.82%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 10,378

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 56.00%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 405

| {{party shading/Others}}| 2.18%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −2,628

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −14.18%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 18,533

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Huron

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,490

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 29.77%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 12,731

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 69.03%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 221

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.20%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −7,241

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −39.26%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 18,442

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| Ingham

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 94,212

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 65.18%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 47,639

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 32.96%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 2,699

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.86%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 46,573

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 32.22%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 144,550

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Ionia

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 10,901

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 33.84%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 20,657

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 64.13%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 651

| {{party shading/Others}}| 2.03%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −9,756

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −30.29%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 32,209

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Iosco

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,373

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 34.92%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 9,759

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 63.42%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 255

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.66%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −4,386

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −28.50%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 15,387

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Iron

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 2,493

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 36.69%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 4,216

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 62.05%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 86

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.26%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −1,723

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −25.36%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 6,795

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Isabella

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 14,072

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 47.74%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 14,815

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 50.26%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 589

| {{party shading/Others}}| 2.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −743

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −2.52%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 29,476

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Jackson

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 31,995

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 39.49%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 47,372

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 58.47%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1,647

| {{party shading/Others}}| 2.04%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −15,377

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −18.98%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 81,014

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| Kalamazoo

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 83,686

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 58.22%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 56,823

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 39.53%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 3,237

| {{party shading/Others}}| 2.25%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 26,863

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 18.69%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 143,746

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Kalkaska

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 3,002

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 28.24%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 7,436

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 69.95%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 193

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.81%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −4,434

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −41.71%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 10,631

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| Kent

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 187,915

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 51.91%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 165,741

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 45.78%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 8,375

| {{party shading/Others}}| 2.31%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 22,174

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 6.13%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 362,031

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Keweenaw

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 672

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 43.16%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 862

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 55.36%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 23

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.48%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −190

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −12.20%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 1,557

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Lake

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 2,288

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 36.13%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 3,946

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 62.32%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 98

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.55%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −1,658

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −26.19%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 6,332

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Lapeer

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 16,367

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 31.04%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 35,482

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 67.29%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 883

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.67%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −19,115

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −36.25%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 52,732

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| Leelanau

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 8,795

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 52.04%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 7,916

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 46.84%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 189

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.12%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 879

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5.20%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 16,900

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Lenawee

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 20,918

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 39.13%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 31,541

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 59.01%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 993

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.86%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −10,623

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −19.88%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 53,452

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Livingston

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 48,220

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 37.91%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 76,982

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 60.52%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1,995

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.57%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −28,762

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −22.61%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 127,197

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Luce

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 842

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 28.00%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 2,109

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 70.14%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 56

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.86%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −1,277

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −42.14%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 3,007

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Mackinac

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 2,632

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 37.47%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 4,304

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 61.27%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 89

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.26%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −1,772

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −23.80%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 7,025

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Macomb

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 223,952

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 45.31%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 263,863

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 53.39%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 6,441

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.30%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −39,911

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −8.08%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 494,256

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Manistee

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 6,107

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 41.60%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 8,321

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 56.69%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 251

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.71%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −2,214

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −15.09%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 14,679

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| Marquette

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 20,465

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 54.50%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 16,286

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 43.37%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 799

| {{party shading/Others}}| 2.13%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 4,179

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 11.13%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 37,550

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Mason

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 6,802

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 39.36%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 10,207

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 59.06%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 274

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.58%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −3,405

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −19.70%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 17,283

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Mecosta

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 7,375

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 34.98%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 13,267

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 62.93%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 439

| {{party shading/Others}}| 2.09%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −5,892

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −27.95%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 21,081

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Menominee

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 4,316

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 34.20%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 8,117

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 64.31%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 188

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.49%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −3,801

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −30.11%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 12,621

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Midland

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 20,493

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 41.67%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 27,675

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 56.28%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1,007

| {{party shading/Others}}| 2.05%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −7,182

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −14.61%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 49,175

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Missaukee

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 1,967

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 22.47%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 6,648

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 75.93%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 140

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.60%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −4,681

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −53.46%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 8,755

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Monroe

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 32,980

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 37.78%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 52,722

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 60.39%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1,597

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.83%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −19,742

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −22.61%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 87,299

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Montcalm

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 9,703

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 30.19%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 21,815

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 67.88%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 620

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.93%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −12,112

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −37.69%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 32,138

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Montmorency

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 1,628

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 27.77%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 4,171

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 71.14%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 64

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.09%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −2,543

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −43.37%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 5,863

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| Muskegon

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 45,643

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 49.37%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 45,133

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 48.82%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1,668

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.81%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 510

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 0.55%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 92,444

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Newaygo

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 7,873

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 28.95%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 18,857

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 69.33%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 467

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.72%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −10,984

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −40.38%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 27,197

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| Oakland

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 434,148

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 56.24%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 325,971

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 42.22%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 11,872

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.54%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 108,177

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 14.02%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 771,991

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Oceana

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 4,944

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 35.11%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 8,892

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 63.15%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 244

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.74%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −3,948

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −28.04%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 14,080

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Ogemaw

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 3,475

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 29.15%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 8,253

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 69.23%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 193

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.62%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −4,778

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −40.08%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 11,921

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Ontonagon

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 1,391

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 36.51%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 2,358

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 61.89%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 61

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.60%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −967

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −25.38%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 3,810

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Osceola

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 3,214

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 26.05%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 8,928

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 72.35%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 198

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.60%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −5,714

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −46.30%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 12,340

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Oscoda

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 1,342

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 27.50%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 3,466

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 71.02%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 72

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.48%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −2,124

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −43.52%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 4,880

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Otsego

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 4,743

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 32.10%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 9,779

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 66.19%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 253

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.71%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −5,036

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −34.09%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 14,775

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Ottawa

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 64,705

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 38.35%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 100,913

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 59.81%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 3,095

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.84%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −36,208

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −21.46%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 168,713

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Presque Isle

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 2,911

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 34.84%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 5,342

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 63.94%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 102

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.22%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −2,431

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −29.10%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 8,355

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Roscommon

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,166

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 34.36%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 9,670

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 64.32%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 198

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.32%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −4,504

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −29.96%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 15,034

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| Saginaw

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 51,088

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 49.37%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 50,785

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 49.08%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1,610

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.55%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 303

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 0.29%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 103,483

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| St. Clair

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 31,363

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 34.02%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 59,185

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 64.19%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1,654

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.79%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −27,822

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −30.17%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 92,202

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| St. Joseph

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 9,262

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 33.10%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 18,127

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 64.78%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 592

| {{party shading/Others}}| 2.12%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −8,865

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −31.68%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 27,981

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Sanilac

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,966

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 26.58%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 16,194

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 72.15%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 286

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.27%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −10,228

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −45.57%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 22,446

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Schoolcraft

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 1,589

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 33.49%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 3,090

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 65.12%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 66

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.39%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −1,501

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −31.63%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 4,745

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Shiawassee

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 15,347

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 39.05%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 23,149

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 58.90%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 805

| {{party shading/Others}}| 2.05%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −7,802

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −19.85%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 39,301

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Tuscola

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 8,712

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 29.55%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 20,297

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 68.85%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 470

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.60%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −11,585

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −39.30%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 29,479

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Van Buren

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 16,803

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 42.92%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 21,591

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 55.16%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 752

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.92%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −4,788

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −12.24%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 39,146

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| Washtenaw

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 157,136

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 72.44%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 56,241

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 25.93%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 3,554

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.63%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 100,895

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 46.51%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 216,931

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| Wayne

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 597,170

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 68.32%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 264,553

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 30.27%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 12,295

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.41%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 332,617

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 38.05%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 874,018

style="text-align:center;"

| {{party shading/Republican}}| Wexford

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 5,838

| {{party shading/Democratic}}| 31.92%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 12,102

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 66.16%

| {{party shading/Others}}| 352

| {{party shading/Others}}| 1.92%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −6,264

| {{party shading/Republican}}| −34.24%

| {{party shading/Republican}}| 18,292

Totals2,804,04550.55%2,649,86447.77%93,2771.68%154,1812.78%5,547,186

{{align|right|{{Switcher| 300px|Swing by county
{{collapsible list| title = Legend|

{{legend|#4bdbff|Democratic — +7.5–10%}}|

{{legend|#77e3ff|Democratic — +5–7.5%}}|

{{legend|#aaeeff|Democratic — +2.5–5%}}|

{{legend|#d5f6ff|Democratic — +0–2.5%}}|

{{legend|#ffd5d5|Republican — +0–2.5%}}|

{{legend|#ffaaaa|Republican — +2.5–5%}}|

{{legend|#ff8080|Republican — +5–7.5%}}}}|

300px|Trend relative to the state by county
{{collapsible list| title = Legend|

{{legend|#4bdbff|Democratic — +7.5–10%}}|

{{legend|#77e3ff|Democratic — +5–7.5%}}|

{{legend|#aaeeff|Democratic — +2.5–5%}}|

{{legend|#d5f6ff|Democratic — +0–2.5%}}|

{{legend|#ffd5d5|Republican — +0–2.5%}}|

{{legend|#ffaaaa|Republican — +2.5–5%}}|

{{legend|#ff8080|Republican — +5–7.5%}}}}|

300px|County flips
{{collapsible list| title = Legend| {{col-begin}}

{{col-2}}

Democratic

{{legend|#92c5de|Hold}}

{{legend|#0671b0|Gain from Republican}}

{{col-2}}

Republican

{{legend|#f48882|Hold}}

{{col-end}}}}}}}}

Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic

  • Leelanau (largest municipality: Greilickville){{Cite news |date=March 17, 2021 |title=Counties that flipped from Donald Trump to Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election |work=The Republican |url=https://www.masslive.com/politics/2021/03/counties-that-flipped-from-donald-trump-to-joe-biden-in-the-2020-presidential-election.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250104034534/https://www.masslive.com/politics/2021/03/counties-that-flipped-from-donald-trump-to-joe-biden-in-the-2020-presidential-election.html |archive-date=January 4, 2025}}
  • Kent (largest municipality: Grand Rapids)
  • Saginaw (largest municipality: Saginaw)

== By congressional district ==

Despite losing the state, Trump won 8 out of the 14 congressional districts in Michigan, including one that elected a Democrat.

class=wikitable
District

! Trump

! Biden

! Representative

align=center

! {{party shading/Republican}}|{{ushr|Michigan|1|1st}}

| 57.9%

| 40.6%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|Jack Bergman

align=center

! {{party shading/Republican}}|{{ushr|Michigan|2|2nd}}

| 55%

| 43.2%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|Bill Huizenga

align=center

! rowspan=2 {{party shading/Republican}}|{{ushr|Michigan|3|3rd}}

| rowspan=2|50.7%

| rowspan=2|47.4%

| {{party shading/Libertarian}}|Justin Amash

align=center

| {{party shading/Republican}}|Peter Meijer

align=center

! {{party shading/Republican}}|{{ushr|Michigan|4|4th}}

| 61.1%

| 37.2%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|John Moolenaar

align=center

! {{party shading/Democratic}}|{{ushr|Michigan|5|5th}}

| 47.1%

| 51.4%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|Dan Kildee

align=center

! {{party shading/Republican}}|{{ushr|Michigan|6|6th}}

| 51.3%

| 46.8%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|Fred Upton

align=center

! {{party shading/Republican}}|{{ushr|Michigan|7|7th}}

| 56.7%

| 41.6%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|Tim Walberg

align=center

! {{party shading/Republican}}|{{ushr|Michigan|8|8th}}

| 49.6%

| 48.8%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|Elissa Slotkin

align=center

! {{party shading/Democratic}}|{{ushr|Michigan|9|9th}}

| 42.7%

| 55.9%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|Andy Levin

align=center

! rowspan=2 {{party shading/Republican}}|{{ushr|Michigan|10|10th}}

| rowspan=2|64.2%

| rowspan=2|34.4%

| {{party shading/Republican}}|Paul Mitchell

align=center

| {{party shading/Republican}}|Lisa McClain

align=center

! {{party shading/Democratic}}|{{ushr|Michigan|11|11th}}

| 47.1%

| 51.6%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|Haley Stevens

align=center

! {{party shading/Democratic}}|{{ushr|Michigan|12|12th}}

| 34.4%

| 64.2%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|Debbie Dingell

align=center

! {{party shading/Democratic}}|{{ushr|Michigan|13|13th}}

| 20%

| 78.8%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|Rashida Tlaib

align=center

! {{party shading/Democratic}}|{{ushr|Michigan|14|14th}}

| 19.6%

| 79.5%

| {{party shading/Democratic}}|Brenda Lawrence

Analysis

Michigan was generally seen as one of the most critical states of the 2020 election; the state boasted a highly prized 16 electoral votes, and had been part of the blue wall since Bill Clinton won the state in 1992. It was key to Trump's surprise victory in 2016, and the Biden campaign paid heavy attention to the state throughout the campaign, looking to avoid a repeat of Hillary Clinton's unexpected collapse in the northern industrial states.{{cite news |last1=Alter |first1=Charlotte |title=Joe Biden is Running an Invisible Digital Campaign in All-Important Michigan. That's Making Some Democrats Nervous |url=https://time.com/5889093/joe-biden-michigan-campaign/ |access-date=December 15, 2020 |agency=Time |date=September 15, 2020}}{{cite news |last1=Emmrich |first1=Stuart |title=Letter From Michigan: Trying to Win a Key Battleground State for Joe Biden, One Door at a Time |url=https://www.vogue.com/article/campaigning-in-michigan-for-joe-biden-one-door-at-a-time |access-date=December 15, 2020 |agency=Vogue |date=October 28, 2020}}

Biden would carry the state by just under 2.8%; while Biden ran well behind Barack Obama in his two campaigns, his margin of victory was nearly in-line for a Democratic candidate, only performing slightly worse than John Kerry's 3.4% margin in 2004, and Al Gore's 5.1% margin in 2000, reflecting some of the steady demographic shifts in the state. Many undecided/third-party voters that had been lost by Clinton appeared to return to the Democratic column, giving Biden enough votes to carry the state.{{cite news|last=Spangler|first=Todd|title=Here's how Biden beat Trump in Michigan — and it wasn't corruption|url=https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/06/joe-biden-donald-trump-michigan-vote/6176981002/|access-date=December 15, 2020|agency=Detroit Free Press|date=November 6, 2020}}

While Michigan returned to the Democratic column with a somewhat comfortable margin, the state's internal politics shifted rather dramatically. Trump performed strongly with white voters without a college degree, winning this group by 17 points, and this group made up about 51% of Michigan's electorate, cementing the white-working-class shift to the GOP; with men, this was even more convincing, as Trump carried white men without a college degree by 30 points. On the other hand, there was a significant suburban shift towards the Democrats; for example, Ottawa County, a suburban county outside of Grand Rapids, has traditionally been a GOP-stronghold in the state; Biden cut into Trump's margins here, and Trump carried this county with less than 60%. Trump held Macomb County, which famously helped him clinch Michigan in 2016, but carried it by only 8 points, 3 points fewer than in 2016.{{cite news |last1=Bartkowiak |first1=Dave |title=Biden wins big in Wayne, Oakland counties while Trump holds onto Macomb County |url=https://www.clickondetroit.com/decision-2020/2020/11/11/how-detroit-suburbs-voted-in-2020-presidential-election/ |access-date=December 15, 2020 |agency=ClickOnDetroit |date=November 11, 2020}}

Other demographic patterns remained the same. Biden won 93% of African-American voters in the state; consequently, Biden improved from Clinton's performance in Wayne County, home of Detroit. Biden's performance among black voters would carry on in other parts of the state; Biden was able to match Clinton's performance in Genesee County,{{cite web |last1=Simpson-Mersha |first1=Isis |title=See how Genesee County in 2020 voted compared to past elections |url=https://www.mlive.com/politics/2020/11/see-how-genesee-county-in-2020-voted-compared-to-past-elections.html |website=MLive |date=November 8, 2020 |access-date=December 15, 2020}} and flipped back Saginaw County.{{cite news |last1=Johnson |first1=Bob |title=Biden narrowly wins Saginaw County |url=https://www.mlive.com/politics/2020/11/biden-narrowly-wins-saginaw-county-after-trump-won-the-county-in-2016.html |access-date=December 15, 2020 |agency=MLive |date=November 4, 2020}}

Biden performed strongly with Michigan's different religious groups; Biden was able to improve from Clinton in the vote share with Evangelical Michiganders. More importantly, Biden performed strongly with white Catholics, who make up a large portion of Michigan's electorate.{{cite news |title=US elections 2020: Trump's support dips among Caucasian evangelical Christians, exit polls show |url=https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/us-elections-2020-donald-trump-support-dips-among-white-evangelical-christians |access-date=December 15, 2020 |agency=Middle East Eye |date=November 6, 2020}} Much of the state's sizable Muslim and Arab American voters backed Biden in the election, in which their support was seen as being important for helping Biden secure victory in Michigan.{{Cite web|last=Davis|first=Gabriel|date=January 19, 2021|title=How Arab Americans Helped Decide the U.S. Election|url=https://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/42237|url-status=live|access-date=2021-11-16|website=Jadaliyya|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210118193939/https://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/42237 |archive-date=January 18, 2021 }}{{Cite web|last=Ramey|first=Elisse|date=November 7, 2020|title=Muslim vote helps secure Michigan for Biden/Harris ticket|url=https://www.abc12.com/2020/11/07/muslim-vote-helps-secure-michigan-for-bidenharris-ticket/|url-status=live|access-date=2021-11-16|website=ABC12|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201107223018/https://www.abc12.com/2020/11/07/muslim-vote-helps-secure-michigan-for-bidenharris-ticket/ |archive-date=November 7, 2020 }}

Jeremy W. Peters of The New York Times wrote that "high Detroit turnout" was a crucial factor aiding Biden.{{cite web|last=Peters|first=Jeremy W.|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/04/us/politics/mi-election.html|title=The view in Michigan: Amid ballot-counting, Biden's team is buoyed by high Detroit turnout.|newspaper=The New York Times|date=2020-11-04|access-date=2020-11-11}} African Americans in Detroit were a major demographic contributing to Joe Biden winning that state.{{cite web|last=Warikoo|first=Niraj|url=https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/06/joe-biden-detroit-michigan-vote-election-2020/6168971002/|title=Black voters in Detroit key for Joe Biden and Gary Peters' victories, advocates say|newspaper=Detroit Free Press|date=2020-11-06|access-date=2020-11-11}} Trump received 12,600 votes in Detroit proper, an increase from the previous election's 7,700. In percentage terms, the shift in Detroit was from Clinton 95–3 to Biden 94–5, a decreased margin from 92 points in 2016 to 89 in 2020. Biden saw increases from 2016 in Oakland and Washtenaw counties.{{cite web|last=Garrison|first=Joey|url=https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/politics/elections/2020/11/13/donald-trump-lost-election-suburbs-not-cities-despite-claims/6263149002/|title=Donald Trump keeps baselessly claiming voter fraud in cities. But suburbs actually lost him the election|newspaper=USA Today|date=2020-11-13|access-date=2020-11-13}}

File:2020 US Presidential Election in Oakland County, Michigan.svg

File:2020 US Presidential Election in Wayne County, Michigan.svg

In Oakland County, Biden won 433,982 votes, making up 56.36% of the votes. The municipalities in Oakland County that majority-voted for Biden versus Trump included Bloomfield Township, Farmington Hills, Madison Heights, Novi, Rochester Hills, Southfield and Troy.{{cite web|last=Bartkowiak|first=Dave Jr.|url=https://www.clickondetroit.com/decision-2020/2020/11/10/how-detroits-oakland-county-suburbs-voted-in-2020-presidential-election/|title=How Detroit's Oakland County suburbs voted in 2020 presidential election|publisher=Click on Detroit|date=2020-11-10|access-date=2020-11-24}}

The number of unbalanced votes in Wayne County for 2020 was below the same number for 2016.{{cite web|last=Ruble|first=Kayla|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/detroit-vote-errors-trump/2020/11/23/ae789912-2d3b-11eb-bae0-50bb17126614_story.html|title=Detroit had more vote errors in 2016 when Trump won Michigan by a narrow margin. He didn't object then.|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=2020-11-23|access-date=2020-11-23}} On November 23, 2020, Michigan certified the results 3–0, with Norm Shinkle abstaining.{{Cite web|url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/11/23/michigan-election-state-canvassers-certification/6390475002/|title = Michigan board certifies Nov. 3 election, cementing Biden victory}}

=Edison exit polls=

class="wikitable sortable"

! colspan="4" |2020 presidential election in Michigan by demographic subgroup (Edison exit polling){{Cite web|title=Michigan 2020 President exit polls.|url=https://www.cnn.com/election/2020/exit-polls/president/michigan|access-date=2020-12-28|website=www.cnn.com|language=en}}{{Cite news|title=Michigan Exit Polls: How Different Groups Voted.|work=The New York Times |date=November 3, 2020 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/exit-polls-michigan.html|access-date=2020-12-28|language=en}}

Demographic subgroup

!Biden

!Trump

!% of

total vote

Total vote

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |50.62

|47.84

|100

colspan="4" |Ideology
Liberals

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |89

|10

|25

Moderates

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |62

|36

|38

Conservatives

|12

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |88

|37

colspan="4" |Party
Democrats

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |97

|3

|38

Republicans

|6

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |94

|38

Independents

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |51

|45

|23

colspan="4" |Gender
Men

|44

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |54

|46

Women

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |57

|43

|54

colspan="4" |Race/ethnicity
White

|44

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |55

|81

Black

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |92

|7

|12

Latino

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |55

|44

|3

Asian

|–

|–

|1

Other

|–

|–

|4

colspan="4" |Age
18–24 years old

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |62

|36

|7

25–29 years old

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |59

|37

|4

30–39 years old

|48

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |50

|14

40–49 years old

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |49

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |49

|15

50–64 years old

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |51

|49

|29

65 and older

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |51

|49

|30

colspan="4" |Sexual orientation
LGBT

|–

|–

|6

Not LGBT

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |53

|47

|94

colspan="4" |Education
High school or less

|49

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |50

|20

Some college education

|49

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |50

|27

Associate degree

|42

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |57

|18

Bachelor's degree

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |55

|44

|20

Postgraduate degree

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |63

|37

|16

colspan="4" |Income
Under $30,000

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |61

|39

|16

$30,000–49,999

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |60

|39

|20

$50,000–99,999

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |55

|44

|34

Over $100,000

|47

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |51

|30

colspan="4" |Union households
Yes

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |62

|37

|21

No

|48

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |51

|79

colspan="4" |Issue regarded as most important
Racial inequality

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |93

|5

|16

Coronavirus

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |94

|5

|18

Economy

|14

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |86

|39

Crime and safety

|22

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |77

|9

Health care

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |85

|12

|10

colspan="4" |Region
Wayne County

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |69

|30

|16

Southeast

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |58

|41

|27

East central

|42

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |57

|24

Southwest

|46

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |53

|19

North central/Upper Peninsula

|40

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |59

|14

colspan="4" |Area type
Urban

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |65

|35

|21

Suburban

|48

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |51

|58

Rural

|45

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |54

|21

colspan="4" |Family's financial situation today
Better than four years ago

|18

| style="text-align:left; background:#ffb6b6;" |81

|41

Worse than four years ago

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |90

|9

|15

About the same

| style="text-align:left; background:#b0ceff;" |72

|27

|43

Aftermath

On November 5, a state judge in Michigan dismissed the Trump campaign's lawsuit requesting a pause in vote-counting to allow access to observers, as the judge noted that vote-counting had already finished in Michigan.{{cite news |last1=Egan |first1=Paul |title=Judge throws out Trump lawsuit over counting of Michigan ballots |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/05/poll-watcher-challenger-ballot-counting-detroit-tcf-center/6172210002/ |access-date=November 11, 2020 |work=Detroit Free Press |date=November 5, 2020 |archive-date=November 8, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108023843/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/05/poll-watcher-challenger-ballot-counting-detroit-tcf-center/6172210002/ |url-status=live }} That judge also noted the official complaint did not state "why, when, where, or by whom" an election observer was allegedly blocked from observing ballot-counting in Michigan.{{cite news |last1=Herb |first1=Jeremy |last2=Polantz |first2=Katelyn |title='Democracy plain and simple': How the 2020 election defied fraud claims and pandemic fears |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/06/politics/us-election-process-success/index.html |access-date=November 11, 2020 |work=CNN |date=November 7, 2020}}

On election night in Antrim County, human error miscounted an unofficial tally of Presidential votes. Next day, the County Clerk pulled the unofficial tally offline. The error was caused by using different kinds of ballots when setting up ballot scanners and result-reporting systems, which mismatched results.{{cite news |last1=Perlroth |first1=Nicole |last2=Nicas |first2=Jack |title=No, Software Glitches Are Not Affecting Vote Counts |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/09/technology/no-software-glitches-are-not-affecting-vote-counts.html |access-date=November 11, 2020 |work=The New York Times |date=November 9, 2020 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20201110103155/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/09/technology/no-software-glitches-are-not-affecting-vote-counts.html |archive-date=November 10, 2020 |url-status=live }} The Republican Clerk admitted that she made a mistake in some precincts, which mismatched precinct results.{{cite news |last1=Hendrickson |first1=Clara |last2=Egan |first2=Paul |title=Antrim County hand tally affirms certified election results |url=https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2020/12/17/antrim-county-hand-tally-certified-election-results/3937898001/ |access-date=September 21, 2023 |work=Detroit Free Press |date=December 17, 2020}} The very next day, she corrected her mistake, tabulated all ballots again and ran a final report to certify Trump's overwhelming win. Nonetheless, this error and a related lawsuit fueled multiple election conspiracy theories.{{cite magazine |last1=Bowden |first1=Mark |last2=Teague |first2=Matthew |title=How a County Clerk in Michigan Found Herself at the Center of Trump's Attempt to Overturn the Election |url=https://time.com/6128812/the-steal-antrim-county-michigan/ |access-date=October 7, 2023 |magazine=Time |date=December 15, 2021}}

Despite pressure from the Trump campaign to hand the decision over the state's presidential electors to the Michigan State Legislature, which would have been an unprecedented maneuver in state history and was not authorized under Michigan law, the statewide results were certified in favor of the Biden/Harris ticket on November 23, with one Republican member of the Michigan Board of State Canvassers abstaining.{{cite news|url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/11/23/michigan-election-state-canvassers-certification/6390475002/|work=The Detroit News|title=Michigan board certifies Nov. 3 election, cementing Biden victory|first1=Craig|last1=Mauger|first2=Melissa|last2=Nann Burke|date=November 23, 2020|access-date=November 23, 2020}}

=Official audits=

In October 2020, the Michigan Election Security Advisory Commission published recommendations for two types of postelection audits: procedural and tabulation audits.{{cite news |last1=Dunaj |first1=Mikhayla |title=Michigan is conducting postelection audits. Here's how that works |url=https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/12/23/michigans-post-election-audit-explained/3935058001/ |access-date=September 21, 2023 |work=Detroit Free Press |date=December 23, 2020}} The first statewide risk-limiting audit included a hand tally of the sampled ballots, which confirmed that Biden received more votes than Trump and the share of votes each candidate received was within a fraction of a percentage point of the certified results.{{cite news |last1=Hendrickson |first1=Clara |title=Michigan election audit affirms November presidential results, Benson says |url=https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2021/02/12/michigan-election-audit-presidential-results/6738200002/ |access-date=September 21, 2023 |work=Detroit Free Press |date=February 12, 2021}} Another tabulation audit confirmed the election results by examining ballots cast, voting machines and the election procedures. The series of post-election audits was the most comprehensive in the state's history.{{cite news |last1=Hendrickson |first1=Clara |title=Michigan completes most comprehensive post-election audit in state history: What it showed |url=https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2021/03/02/michigan-election-audit-results/6884982002/ |access-date=September 21, 2023 |work=Detroit Free Press |date=March 2, 2021}}

In Antrim County, the Clerk's Office was joined by a bipartisan team of clerks to perform a hand recount of every single ballot. Their recount proved that the county's election results had been accurately certified. The Republican Chairman concluded in a letter prefacing his state Senate Oversight Committee's election report: "all compelling theories that sprang forth from the rumors surrounding Antrim County are diminished so significantly as for it to be a complete waste of time to consider them further."{{cite news |last1=Hendrickson |first1=Clara| last2=Boucher |first2=Dave |title=Michigan Republican-led investigation rejects Trump's claim that Nov. 3 election was stolen |url=https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2021/06/23/michigan-senate-investigation-election-trump/5035244001/ |access-date=September 21, 2023 |work=Detroit Free Press |date=June 23, 2021}}

After eight months investigating the state's 2020 general election process, he and his Republican Committee members all voted for the Senate to adopt their report. Their report concluded, "The Committee found no evidence of widespread or systemic fraud in Michigan's prosecution of the 2020 election."

=Election law changes since then=

Due to voters approving no-reason-required absentee voting in 2018 and the COVID pandemic, there was a record number of absentee voters. Michigan law at that time did not allow for the tabulating of absentee ballots until after the polling place ballots were counted. That led to days before Biden was declared the winner.{{cite web | url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/04/politics/why-mail-in-ballots-were-counted-late-in-states-like-pennsylvania-and-michigan/index.html | title=Why mail-in ballots in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania were counted so late | CNN Politics | website=CNN | date=November 4, 2020 }} In 2022, voters approved a ballot proposal making it easier to vote. In the aftermath, Michigan lawmakers made changes in election laws which, among other things, allowed cities and townships to begin tabulating absentee ballots before Election Day.{{cite web | url=https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-government/whats-new-state-voting-process | title=Michigan has new voting processes for 2024. What to know | Bridge Michigan }}

See also

Notes

Partisan clients

{{notelist-ua}}

Voter samples and additional candidates

{{notelist}}

References

{{Reflist|30em}}

Further reading

  • {{citation |url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/politics/michigan-political-geography |work= Washingtonpost.com |title= The six political states of Michigan |author1= David Weigel |author2= Lauren Tierney |date= August 9, 2020 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200909005735/https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/politics/michigan-political-geography/ |archive-date= September 9, 2020 |access-date= September 7, 2020 |url-status= dead }}. (describes 2016 political geography of Detroit; Detroit suburbs; the Middle; the Thumb; the West; Upper Peninsula and North)
  • {{citation |url=https://www.nass.org/sites/default/files/surveys/2020-10/summary-electoral-college-laws-100220.pdf |publisher=National Association of Secretaries of State |location=Washington DC |title=Summary: State Laws on Presidential Electors |date=August 2020 |quote= Michigan }}
  • {{citation |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/06/opinion/biden-trump-bellwether-counties-.html |work= The New York Times |title= The 10 Bellwether Counties That Show How Trump Is in Serious Trouble |author= David Wasserman |date= October 6, 2020 }}. (describes bellwether Kent County, Michigan)
  • {{citation |url= https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/17/us/politics/voters-michigan-kalamazoo.html |title= In Kalamazoo, Old High School Classmates Reckon With a Divided Country |author= Jennifer Steinhauer |date= October 17, 2020 |work=The New York Times }}