Arthur Andersen

{{Main|Arthur E. Andersen}}

File:Arthur Edward Andersen.png

File:Andersen revenue.svg

Born on May 30, 1885, in Plano, Illinois, and orphaned at the age of 16, Arthur E. Andersen began working as a mail boy by day and attended school at night, eventually being hired as the assistant to the comptroller of Allis-Chalmers in Chicago. In 1908, after attending courses at night while working full-time, he graduated from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University with a bachelor's degree in business. That same year, at age 23, he became the youngest Certified Public Accountant in Illinois.{{cite journal | last1=Moore |first1=Mary Virginia |last2=Crampton |first2=John | title=Arthur Andersen: Challenging the Status Quo| journal=The Journal of Business Leadership | publisher=American National Business Hall of Fame | url=http://www.anbhf.org/pdf/moore_crampton.pdf | volume=11 | issue=3 | pages=71–89 | year=2000 | access-date=May 5, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100813191757/http://www.anbhf.org/pdf/moore_crampton.pdf | archive-date=August 13, 2010 | url-status=dead}}

In 1913, Andersen and Clarence DeLany founded an accounting firm as Andersen, DeLany & Co. The firm changed its name to Arthur Andersen & Co. in 1918. Arthur Andersen's first client was the Joseph Schlitz Brewing Company of Milwaukee.{{cite book |last= Squires|first=Susan |date=2003 |title=Inside Arthur Andersen: Shifting Values, Unexpected Consequences |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YZOWTE4VQeAC&pg=PA28 |publisher=FT Press |page=28 |isbn=978-0-13-140896-8 |access-date=July 8, 2014 }} In 1915, due to his many contacts there, the Milwaukee office was opened as the firm's second office.

Andersen believed education was the basis upon which the new profession of accounting should be developed. He created the profession's first centralized training program and believed in training during normal working hours. In 1927, he was elected to the board of trustees of Northwestern University and served as its president from 1930 to 1932. He was also chairman of the board of CPA examiners of Illinois.

Andersen, who headed the firm until his death in 1947, was a zealous supporter of high standards in the accounting industry. A stickler for honesty, he argued that accountants' responsibility was to investors, not their clients' management. This gave rise to the uniform look of all the so-called "Arthur Androids", as employees referred to themselves, the intent being to provide the same service the same way to all customers in all locations. For many years, Andersen's motto was "Think straight, talk straight"—an axiom passed on from his mother.{{cite book |last1=Toffler |first1=Barbara Ley |last2=Reingold |first2=Jennifer |title=Final Accounting: Ambition, Greed, and the Fall of Arthur Andersen |date=2004 |publisher=Currency/Doubleday |isbn=978-0-7679-1383-6 |page=9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gQsOfnuCAnUC&pg=PA9 |access-date=March 15, 2019 |language=en}} During the early years, it is reputed that Andersen was approached by an executive from a local rail utility to sign off on accounts containing flawed accounting, or else face the loss of a major client. Andersen refused in no uncertain terms, replying that there was "not enough money in the city of Chicago" to make him do it. The railroad fired Andersen, only to go bankrupt a few months later.{{cite news|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/emotional-intelligence-did-myers-briggs-destroy-arthur-andersen/|title=Emotional Intelligence: Did Myers-Briggs Destroy Arthur Andersen? |newspaper= CBS News|date=3 May 2011|access-date=30 January 2024}}

Arthur Andersen & Co. also led the way in a number of areas of accounting standards. Being among the first to identify a possible sub-prime bust, Arthur Andersen dissociated itself from a number of clients in the 1970s.{{cite web|url=http://archives.cpajournal.com/2004/204/infocus/p22.htm|title=Reclaiming the Profession's Heritage|publisher=CPA Journal|date=1 February 2004|access-date=30 January 2024}}

Arthur Andersen & Co. struggled to balance the need to maintain its faithfulness to accounting standards with its clients' desire to maximize profits, particularly in the era of quarterly earnings reports. The firm has been alleged to have been involved in the fraudulent accounting and auditing of Sunbeam Products, Waste Management, Asia Pulp & Paper,{{cite news |url=https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB998243223377564102|title= APP and Arthur Andersen Face Class-Action Lawsuits|author=Sara Webb|newspaper=Wall Street Journal |date=August 20, 2001}} the Baptist Foundation of Arizona, WorldCom, as well as Enron, among others.{{cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/30/AR2006093000928.html|title=Executives Sentenced in Church Fraud|author=Terry Greene Sterling|newspaper=The Washington Post |date=October 1, 2006}}{{cite magazine |url=https://www.forbes.com/2002/06/27/0627topnews.html |title=WorldCom: Too Easy, Too Late|author=Dan Ackman|magazine=Forbes |date=June 27, 2002}}

The consulting wing of the firm became increasingly important during the 1970s and 1980s, growing at a much faster rate than the more established accounting, auditing, and tax practice. In a further effort to take advantage of economies of scale, Price Waterhouse and Arthur Andersen discussed a merger in 1989{{cite web|url=http://faculty.washington.edu/krumme/companies/account.html |title=University of Washington: Accounting firms and organisations |publisher=Faculty.washington.edu}} but the negotiations failed, mainly because of conflicts of interest such as Andersen's strong commercial links with IBM and PW's audit of IBM, as well as the two firms' radically different cultures. It was said by those involved with the failed merger that at the end of the discussion, the partners at the table realized they had different views of business, and the potential merger was scrapped.{{cite news|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1989-09-26-fi-365-story.html|title=Accounting Giants Call Off Merger Plan : Price Waterhouse, Arthur Andersen Cite 'Differences'|newspaper=Los Angeles Times|date=26 September 1989|access-date=17 August 2013}}

In 1989, Arthur Andersen and Andersen Consulting became separate units of Andersen Worldwide Société Coopérative. The two businesses spent most of the 1990s in a bitter dispute. Andersen Consulting saw a huge surge in profits during the decade. The consultants, however, continued to resent transfer payments they were required to make to Arthur Andersen. In August 2000, at the conclusion of International Chamber of Commerce arbitration of the dispute, the arbitrators granted Andersen Consulting its independence from Arthur Andersen, but awarded $1.2 billion in past payments (held in escrow pending the ruling) to Arthur Andersen, and declared that Andersen Consulting could no longer use the Andersen name.{{cite web|url=https://www.trans-lex.org/209797/_/icc-award-no-9797-asa-bull-2000-at-514-et-seq/|title=Final Award in ICC Case No. 9797/CK/AER/ACS, Andersen Consulting Business Unit Member Firms v. Arthur Andersen Business Unit Member Firms and Andersen Worldwide Société Coopérative, made in Geneva on 28 July 2000|publisher=Trans-Lex|access-date=30 January 2024}}{{cite news|url=https://money.cnn.com/2000/08/07/news/andersen/|title=Andersen Consulting arm wins divorce it sought from Arthur Andersen|date=7 August 2000|newspaper=CNN|access-date=30 January 2024}} As a result, Andersen Consulting changed its name to Accenture on January 1, 2001, and Arthur Andersen, having the right to the Andersen Consulting name, rebranded itself to "Andersen".{{cite news|url=https://www.independent.ie/business/no-more-arthur-for-big-andersen-firm-in-revamp/26092350.html|title=No more 'Arthur' for big Andersen firm in revamp|date=6 March 2001|newspaper=The Irish Independent| access-date=30 January 2024}}

Four hours after the arbitrator made his ruling, Arthur Andersen CEO Jim Wadia resigned. Industry analysts and business school professors alike viewed the event as a complete victory for Andersen Consulting.{{cite web | author=Mitchell Martin |title=Arbitrator's Ruling Goes Against Accounting Arm: Consultants Win Battle Of Andersen |url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2000/08/08/consult.2.t.php |work=International Herald Tribune |date=August 8, 2000 |access-date=May 5, 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080308142059/http://www.iht.com/articles/2000/08/08/consult.2.t.php |archive-date=March 8, 2008 |url-status=live }} Wadia would provide insight on his resignation years later at a Harvard Business school case activity about the split. It turned out that the Arthur Andersen board passed a resolution saying he had to resign if he did not get at least an incremental $4 billion (either through negotiation or via the arbitrator decision) for the consulting practice to split off, hence his quick resignation once the decision was announced.{{cite news| url = https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/4461169/Andersen-chief-quits-as-14bn-claim-fails.html |title= Andersen chief quits as $14bn claim fails|author= Philip Aldrick|newspaper=The Daily Telegraph |date = August 8, 2000}}

Accounts vary on why the split occurred—executives on both sides of the split cite greed and arrogance on the part of the other side. The executives on the Andersen Consulting side maintained it was a breach of contract when Arthur Andersen created a second consulting group, AABC (Arthur Andersen Business Consulting) which competed directly with Andersen Consulting in the marketplace.{{cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/arthur-andersen-head-resigns-712089.html|title=Arthur Andersen head resigns|date=8 August 2000|newspaper=The Independent|access-date=30 January 2024}}

{{Main|Enron scandal}}

Following the 2001 scandal in which energy giant Enron was found to have fraudulently reported $100 billion in revenue through institutional and systematic accounting fraud, Andersen's performance and alleged complicity as an auditor came under intense scrutiny. The Powers Committee (appointed by Enron's board to look into the firm's accounting in October 2001) came to the following assessment: "The evidence available to us suggests that Andersen did not fulfill its professional responsibilities in connection with its audits of Enron's financial statements, or its obligation to bring to the attention of Enron's Board (or the Audit and Compliance Committee) concerns about Enron's internal contracts over the related-party transactions".{{cite web |first=Andrew |last=Cornford

| title=Internationally Agreed Principles for Corporate Governance and the Enron Case | publisher=United Nations Conference on Trade and Development |series=G-24 Discussion Paper Series No. 30 | location=New York City |date=June 2004 | page=30 | url=http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/gdsmdpbg2420046_en.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110304064316/http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/gdsmdpbg2420046_en.pdf | url-status=live | archive-date=March 4, 2011}}

On June 15, 2002, Andersen was convicted of obstruction of justice for shredding documents related to its audit of Enron. Although the Supreme Court reversed the firm's conviction, the impact of the scandal combined with the findings of criminal complicity ultimately destroyed the firm. Nancy Temple (in the firm's legal department) and David Duncan (lead partner for the Enron account) were cited as the responsible managers in the scandal because they ordered subordinates to shred relevant documents.{{Cite web |url=http://bodurtha.georgetown.edu/enron/Andersen%20Ex-Party%20Pleads%20Guilty,%20In%20a%20Significant%20Blow%20to%20the%20Firm.htm |title=Andersen Ex-Party Pleads Guilty, In a Significant Blow to the Firm |access-date=2006-02-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050905085752/http://bodurtha.georgetown.edu/enron/Andersen%20Ex-Party%20Pleads%20Guilty,%20In%20a%20Significant%20Blow%20to%20the%20Firm.htm |archive-date=2005-09-05 |url-status=dead }}

Because the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not accept audits from convicted felons, the firm agreed to surrender its CPA licenses and its right to practice before the SEC on August 31, 2002—effectively putting the firm out of business. It had already started winding down its American operations after the indictment, and many of its accountants joined other firms. The firm sold the majority of its American operations to other accounting firms such as KPMG,{{cite news|url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/kpmg-to-buy-arthur-andersen-consulting-firms-1.355670|title=KPMG to buy Arthur Andersen consulting firms|date=8 May 2002|newspaper=CBC|access-date=30 January 2024}} Ernst & Young,{{cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1017686314537631360|title=Ernst & Young Steps Up Push for Andersen Units|date=2 April 2002|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal| access-date=30 January 2024}} Deloitte & Touche{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/business/2002/apr/10/enron2|title=Andersen UK to merge with Deloitte & Touche|date=10 April 2002|newspaper=The Guardian|access-date=30 January 2024}} and Grant Thornton International.{{cite news|url=https://www.bizjournals.com/tampabay/stories/2002/06/10/story1.html|title=Grant Thornton buys Andersen practices|date=10 June 2002|newspaper=Tampa Bay Business Journal| access-date=30 January 2024}} At this time, Arthur Andersen had lost most of its business and two-thirds of its 28,000 employees.{{Cite news |last=Maurer |first=Mark |title=Arthur Andersen's Legacy, 20 Years After Its Demise, Is Complicated |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/arthur-andersens-legacy-20-years-after-its-demise-is-complicated-11661938200 |access-date=2023-05-09 |newspaper=Wall Street Journal |date=August 31, 2022 |language=en-US}}

The indictment also put a spotlight on the firm's faulty audits of other companies, most notably Waste Management, Sunbeam Products, the Baptist Foundation of Arizona and WorldCom.{{cite news|url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/sns-worldcom-andersen-ct-story.html|title=Andersen was WorldCom auditor|date=26 June 2002|newspaper=Chicago Tribune|access-date=30 January 2024}}

On May 31, 2005, in Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed Andersen's conviction because of errors in the trial judge's jury instructions. The Supreme Court held that the instructions were too vague to allow a jury to find that obstruction of justice had occurred. The court found that the instructions were worded in such a way that Andersen could have been convicted without any proof that the firm knew it had broken the law or that there had been a link to any official proceeding that prohibited the destruction of documents. The opinion, written by Chief Justice William Rehnquist, also expressed skepticism of the government's concept of "corrupt persuasion"—persuading someone to engage in an act with an improper purpose without knowing that the act is unlawful.{{cite court |litigants=Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States |vol=544 |reporter=U.S. |opinion=696 |date=2005 |url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04-368.ZS.html|quote=}}

The firm collapsed by mid-2002, as details of its questionable accounting practices for energy company Enron and telecommunications company Worldcom were revealed amid the two high-profile bankruptcies. The scandals were a factor in the enactment of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 to increase oversight and protect whistleblowers.Savage, Charlie [https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/26/us/politics/obstruction-trump-search-documents.html "Possibility of Obstruction Looms Over Trump After Thwarted Efforts to Recover Documents"] The New York Times, August 26, 2022. Retrieved January 17, 2025. After the collapse, some parts of the company continue to exist: the company's consulting services were split out before the collapse and continue today as Accenture and Protiviti, while some of the former partners formed a new firm in 2002 focused on tax services, now called Andersen Tax.

The 2005 Supreme Court ruling theoretically left Andersen free to resume operations. However, CNN reported that by then, Andersen was "nearly defunct," with about 200 employees remaining from a high of 28,000 in 2002.{{cite news |title=Arthur Andersen conviction overturned |url=http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/05/31/scotus.arthur.andersen/ |access-date=November 4, 2018 |work=www.cnn.com |date=May 31, 2005}} Following the ruling, William Mateja, a former counsel to the US Attorney General who had supervised the Andersen appeal, told NPR that he did not believe the government would seek a retrial because, "there's nothing left of Arthur Andersen, and to spend the taxpayers' money on another prosecution would be just—defy common sense." Echoing this, United States Chamber of Commerce vice president Stephen Bokat pronounced Andersen "dead," and said that "there is no putting the company back together."{{cite news |title=Supreme Court Throws Out Arthur Andersen Conviction |url=https://www.npr.org/2005/05/31/4673930/supreme-court-throws-out-arthur-andersen-conviction |access-date=November 4, 2018 |work=NPR.org |date=2005 |language=en}} In his post-mortem of the Enron scandal, Conspiracy of Fools, journalist Kurt Eichenwald argued that even if Andersen had escaped the Enron scandal, it would have likely been brought down by the massive accounting fraud at WorldCom. The WorldCom fraud came to light just days after Andersen was convicted of wrongdoing at Enron.{{cite book|title=Conspiracy of Fools|last=Eichenwald|first=Kurt|author-link=Kurt Eichenwald|publisher=Broadway Books|year=2005|isbn=0-7679-1179-2|title-link=Conspiracy of Fools}}

As a result, Andersen has never returned as a viable business on even a limited scale. Ownership of the partnership has been ceded to four limited liability companies named Omega Management I through IV.{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jMI6AQAAIAAJ |title=Final Report of Neal Batson, Court-appointed Examiner In Re-Enron Corp., Et Al, Debtors|year= 2003 |page=61|publisher=United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York}}

Arthur Andersen LLP operated the Q Center conference center in St. Charles, Illinois, until day-to-day management was turned over to Dolce Hotels and Resorts in 2014, but Andersen retains ownership.{{cite news|last1=Menchaca|first1=Charles|title=Dolce Hotels named manager of the Q Center in St. Charles|url=http://www.kcchronicle.com/2014/09/02/dolce-hotels-named-manager-of-the-q-center-in-st-charles/ajrlrlt/|access-date=April 24, 2017|work=Kane County Chronicle|date=September 3, 2014}} In 2018, that relationship ended, and day-to-day management returned to the Q Center. The Q Center is currently used for training, primarily for internal Accenture personnel, and other large-scale companies.{{cite web|title=Our History – Q Center – The Dolce Conference Collection|url=https://www.qcenter.com/about-us/history/|website=Q Center|access-date=April 24, 2017|language=en|archive-date=April 25, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170425031630/https://www.qcenter.com/about-us/history/|url-status=dead}}

In 2014, Wealth Tax and Advisory Services (WTAS), a tax and consulting firm started by several former Andersen partners, changed its name to Andersen Tax after acquiring the rights to the Andersen name. It rebranded its year-old international arm, WTAS Global, as Andersen Global.Rapoport, Michael. [https://www.wsj.com/articles/tax-firm-to-revive-arthur-andersen-name-1409626508?mod=WSJ_LatestHeadlines "Tax Firm to Revive Arthur Andersen Name"], The Wall Street Journal, 2014

Many offices were acquired by other consulting firms as described above. Some partners formed new companies such as:

• Accuracy which was founded in 2004 by a team of seven former partners and is headquartered in Paris{{Cite web|title=Accuracy: the irresistible rise of an achiever - Leaders League|url=https://www.leadersleague.com/en/news/accuracy-the-irresistible-rise-of-an-achiever|access-date=2020-11-26|website=www.leadersleague.com|language=en}}
• Andersen Tax which acquired the rights to the company name and changed their name from WTAS in 2014{{cite news|title=Revive Arthur Andersen Name |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/tax-firm-to-revive-arthur-andersen-name-1409626508 |newspaper=Wall Street Journal |access-date=December 15, 2015 |issn=0099-9660 |first=Michael |last=Rapoport}}
• BearingPoint, formerly the US consulting unit spun off by KPMG, which purchased Andersen business consulting practices in various countries{{cite news|url=https://www.crn.com/news/channel-programs/18820867/kpmg-consulting-to-acquire-andersen-consulting-units-for-63-million|title=KPMG Consulting To Acquire Andersen Consulting Units For $63 Million|date=26 June 2002|newspaper=CRN|access-date=30 January 2024}}
• Huron Consulting Group, which was formed by former employees of the Chicago office of Andersen{{cite news |last1=Alexander |first1=Delroy |title=275 Andersen employees resign to create own firm |url=https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2002-05-22-0205220487-story.html |access-date=6 December 2023 |date=22 May 2002}}
• West Monroe Partners which was founded in 2002 by a few former consultants, based in Chicago{{cite web|url=https://bravanti.com/a-people-first-organization-driven-by-values/|title=An Interview with Founders of West Monroe Partners|date=August 29, 2019 |publisher=Bravanti| access-date=30 January 2024}}
• Navigant Consulting which absorbed eight partners from Andersen{{cite news|url=https://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20020530/NEWS01/20005552/navigant-picks-up-andersen-staff|title=Navigant picks up Andersen staff|newspaper=Chicago Business|date=30 May 2002| access-date=30 January 2024}}
• Protiviti was formed in 2002 by hiring more than 700 professionals who had been affiliated with the internal audit, business and technology risk consulting practice of Arthur Andersen.{{cite news |title=Robert Half hires 760 from Arthur Andersen |url=https://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2002/05/20/daily48.html |access-date=18 January 2023 |work=www.bizjournals.com |date=24 May 2002}}
• SMART Business Advisory and Consulting which absorbed some staff{{cite news|url=https://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/stories/2008/12/15/daily10.html|title=James Smart out at Smart Business Advisory|date=16 December 2008|newspaper=Philadelphia Business Journal| access-date=30 January 2024}}
• jcba Limited which was founded by a partner from the aviation practice{{cite web|url=http://www.adame.ae/about/|title=ADA Millennium " About|access-date=July 2, 2015}}{{cite web|url=http://jcba.co.uk/the-jcba-team/|title=The jcba team |access-date=July 2, 2015|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150703042314/http://jcba.co.uk/the-jcba-team/|archive-date=July 3, 2015}}
• True Partners Consulting, a tax consultancy founded by Arthur Andersen alumni{{cite news|url=https://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20150218/NEWS04/150219794/true-partners-consulting-sues-andersen-tax-for-poaching |title=True Partners Consulting sues Andersen Tax for poaching |work=Chicago Business |date=February 18, 2015 |access-date=May 3, 2021 |quote=A tax consultancy founded by Arthur Andersen alumni is suing another, larger offshoot of the storied Chicago accounting firm, accusing it of poaching a key partner and several of his clients.}}

• Accounting scandals
• Conspiracy of Fools
• Corporate abuse
• David J. Lesar
• Timeline of the Enron scandal

{{Reflist}}

• {{web archive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010610101018/http://www.andersen.com/website.nsf/content/DynamicSiteMap?OpenDocument|title=Official website}}

{{Consulting}}

{{Dot-com Bubble}}

{{Authority control}}

Category:Accounting scandals

Category:Consulting firms established in 1913

Category:Financial services companies established in 1913

Category:Financial services companies disestablished in 2002

Category:Corporate crime

Category:Defunct financial services companies of the United States

Category:Enron

Category:Defunct companies based in Chicago

Category:Defunct accounting firms of the United States

Category:1913 establishments in Illinois