Business-firm party

{{short description|Political party centered on its leader}}

{{use American English|date=August 2020}}

{{use dmy dates|date=August 2020}}

File:ANO Logo.svg's ANO has been described as "an extreme form of a business-firm party".]]

{{Party politics}}

A business-firm party, entrepreneurial party, personal party{{cite journal |first=Michal |last=Smrek |title=Can Personal Parties Facilitate Women's Political Seniority? A Study of Internal Rules of Conduct |journal=Social Politics |date=2020 |volume=29 |issue=1 |pages=240–259 |doi=10.1093/sp/jxaa031 }} or personalist party{{cite book |doi=10.1093/oso/9780198888079.003.0002 |chapter=What Are Personalist Parties? |title=The Origins of Elected Strongmen |date=2024 |last1=Frantz |first1=Erica |last2=Kendall-Taylor |first2=Andrea |last3=Wright |first3=Joseph |pages=22–62 |isbn=978-0-19-888807-9 }}{{cite journal |last1=Frantz |first1=Erica |last2=Kendall-Taylor |first2=Andrea |last3=Li |first3=Jia |last4=Wright |first4=Joseph |title=Personalist ruling parties in democracies |journal=Democratization |date=4 July 2022 |volume=29 |issue=5 |pages=918–938 |doi=10.1080/13510347.2021.2019711 |url=https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/17374306 }}{{cite journal |last1=Li |first1=Jia |last2=Wright |first2=Joseph |title=How Personalist Parties Undermine State Capacity in Democracies |journal=Comparative Political Studies |date=November 2023 |volume=56 |issue=13 |pages=2030–2065 |doi=10.1177/00104140231169014 |doi-access=free }} is a type of political party that is centered on a charismatic political entrepreneur, most often created by that person to further their own interests.

{{TOC limit|2}}

Definition

It can be considered "the most extreme case of party personalization, consisting in the full control by an individual leader of the party he has himself created", in the words of political scientist Mauro Calise. A business-firm party is modeled off the top-down organizational structure of a corporation as opposed to operating on the basis of internal party democracy. The party structure is related to the older type of elite party, but is even more strongly oligarchic in form, as the political entrepreneur maintains complete control of the party's assets.{{cite book |last1=Saalfeld |first1=Thomas |last2=Strøm |first2=Kaare |editor1-last=Martin |editor1-first=Shane |editor2-last=Saalfeld |editor2-first=Thomas |editor3-last=Strøm |editor3-first=Kaare |title=The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies |date=2014 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-965301-0 |language=en |chapter=Political Parties and Legislators|page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=beS4AwAAQBAJ&dq=entrepreneurial+party&pg=PA380 380]}} The entrepreneur controls all aspects of the party's platform and campaigning, plays the ultimate role in selecting candidates to run in elections, managing the party's resources, and wielding party discipline over other politicians in the party.

One characteristic distinguishing them from other parties is that the party organization is either dormant or limited outside of campaign seasons, and members are actively discouraged from becoming more involved in the party, therefore leading entrepreneurial parties to lack grassroots capacity. Entrepreneurial parties may have only one member, the party leader (as in the case of Party for Freedom or the Ticino League), or very few aside from politicians. The Party for Freedom initially did not recruit members out of fear of infiltration by the far-right; later, deputy leader Martin Bosma said that a party membership structure interfered with direct accountability between party leadership and voters. In a completely memberless business-firm party, volunteers, donors, and officeholders invest time, money, and their reputation (if the party is controversial) without any formal say in the party's operations.

Causes and effects

More monocratic systems of government, such as presidential systems, tend to encourage the formation of personal parties while the personalization of politics fuels the centralization of power.{{sfn|Musella|2018|p=9}} Entrepreneurial parties tend to be short-lived and rarely outlast their founders, except where the entrepreneur is successful in using his charisma to build a mass-membership party, as in the case of the Finns Party.{{cite journal |last1=Arter |first1=David |title=When new party X has the 'X factor': On resilient entrepreneurial parties |journal=Party Politics |date=2016 |volume=22 |issue=1 |pages=15–26 |doi=10.1177/1354068813509523 }}{{cite journal |last1=Bolleyer |first1=Nicole |last2=Bytzek |first2=Evelyn |title=Origins of party formation and new party success in advanced democracies: Origins of party formation and new party success |journal=European Journal of Political Research |date=2013 |volume=52 |issue=6 |pages=773–796 |doi=10.1111/1475-6765.12013 |hdl=10871/14874 |hdl-access=free }} Due to the lack of grassroots mobilization, leader-oriented parties may be less successful in local and regional politics, which are more distant from the charismatic leader, as occurred with ANO 2011 and Forza Italia.

Entrepreneurial parties are commonly far-right, nationalist, and/or populist. However, another tendency is not to have a firm ideology and instead closely follow opinion polls while being vague or self-contradictory on the party's standpoint. Tatiana Kostadinova and Barry Levitt argue that in a personalist party, "interactions between the leader and other politicians are driven mainly by loyalty to that leader rather than, for example, organizational rules, ideological affinities, or programmatic commitments".{{cite journal |last1=Kostadinova |first1=Tatiana |last2=Levitt |first2=Barry |title=Toward a Theory of Personalist Parties: Concept Formation and Theory Building: Concept Formation and Theory Building |journal=Politics & Policy |date=2014 |volume=42 |issue=4 |pages=490–512 |doi=10.1111/polp.12081}} Business-firm parties are likely to emerge in new democracies{{cite book |last1=Svåsand |first1=Lars |title=Party Governance and Party Democracy |date=2013 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-1-4614-6588-1 |pages=253–274 |language=en |chapter=Party Development in the Old World: And in the New}} and in situations of high electoral volatility. They may also result from declines in political participation and membership in traditional parties. In central Europe, entrepreneurial parties have formed as a type of state capture where state powers are used for private benefit.{{cite journal |last1=Innes |first1=Abby |title=The Political Economy of State Capture in Central Europe |journal=JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies |date=2014 |volume=52 |issue=1 |pages=88–104 |doi=10.1111/jcms.12079|doi-access=free}} Entrepreneurial parties are especially common in Latin America. In Slovakia, the personal Freedom and Solidarity party has a market-liberal ideology.

Constitutionality

The Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany requires that political parties "conform to democratic principles" in their internal organization.{{cite journal |last1=Wise |first1=Judith |title=Dissent and the Militant Democracy: The German Constitution and the Banning of the Free German Workers Party |journal=The University of Chicago Law School Roundtable |date=1998 |volume=5 |issue=1 |url=https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/roundtable/vol5/iss1/11/ }}{{cite journal |last1=Mersel |first1=Yigal |title=The dissolution of political parties: The problem of internal democracy |journal=International Journal of Constitutional Law |date=2006 |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=84–113 |doi=10.1093/icon/moi053|doi-access=free}} When the Socialist Reich Party was banned in 1952, the Federal Constitutional Court's judgement stated: "If a party's internal organization does not correspond to democratic principles, one may generally conclude that the party seeks to impose upon the state the structural principles that it has implemented within its own organization." The constitutions of Portugal, Spain, Argentina, and Turkey include similar provisions. Israeli jurist {{ill|Yigal Mersel|he|יגאל מרזל}} argues that non-democratically organized parties are undesirable because "There is a greater likelihood of the pursuit of nondemocratic goals in parties that have a nondemocratic structure."

Examples

=Asia=

==Georgia==

==Indonesia==

  • Perindo (Hary Tanoesoedibjo){{cite book |last1=Rohman |first1=Ahmad Zaki Fadlur |last2=Afala |first2=Laode Machdani |title=Proceedings of the Unhas International Conference on Social and Political Science (UICoSP 2017) |chapter=Perindo: The emergence of the Business Party in Indonesia |date=2017 |doi=10.2991/uicosp-17.2017.2|isbn=978-94-6252-396-8 |doi-access=free }}

==Israel==

==Thailand==

  • Thai Rak Thai Party (Thaksin Shinawatra){{cite journal |last1=McDonnell |first1=Duncan |last2=Cabrera |first2=Luis |title=The right-wing populism of India's Bharatiya Janata Party (and why comparativists should care) |journal=Democratization |date=2019 |volume=26 |issue=3 |pages=484–501 |doi=10.1080/13510347.2018.1551885 }}

==Turkey==

  • Rights and Equality Party (Osman Pamukoğlu){{cite journal |last1=Tezcür |first1=Güneş Murat |title=Trends and Characteristics of the Turkish Party System in Light of the 2011 Elections |journal=Turkish Studies |date=2012 |volume=13 |issue=2 |pages=117–134 |doi=10.1080/14683849.2012.685251 }}
  • Young Party (Cem Uzan)

=Africa=

==Lesotho==

  • Revolution for Prosperity under Sam Matekane's leadership{{cite web | url=https://www.thepost.co.ls/insight/rfps-violation-of-democratic-norms/ | title=RFP's violation of democratic norms - the Post | date=5 July 2022 }}

=Europe=

==Austria==

==Belgium==

==Czech Republic==

  • Public Affairs (Vít Bárta){{cite journal |last1=Cabada |first1=Ladislav |last2=Tomšič |first2=Matevž |title=The Rise of Person-Based Politics in the New Democracies: The Czech Republic and Slovenia |journal=Politics in Central Europe |date=2016 |volume=12 |issue=2 |pages=29–50 |doi=10.1515/pce-2016-0011 |doi-access=free }}{{cite journal |last1=Hloušek |first1=Vít |last2=Kopeček |first2=Lubomír |title=Different Ways of Institutionalising Entrepreneurial Parties: Czech Public Affairs Party and ANO |journal=Politologický časopis - Czech Journal of Political Science |date=2017 |volume=24 |issue=2 |pages=92–115 |doi=10.5817/PC2017-2-92 }}{{cite journal |last1=Just |first1=Petr |last2=Charvát |first2=Jakub |title=Business‑Firm Parties and the Czech Party System after 2010 |journal=Politics in Central Europe |date=2016 |volume=12 |issue=3 |pages=83–110 |doi=10.1515/pce-2016-0018|doi-access=free}}
  • ANO 2011 (Andrej Babiš){{cite journal |last1=Kopeček |first1=Lubomír |title='I'm Paying, So I Decide': Czech ANO as an Extreme Form of a Business-Firm Party |journal=East European Politics and Societies |date=2016 |volume=30 |issue=4 |pages=725–749 |doi=10.1177/0888325416650254 }}{{cite journal |last1=Hloušek |first1=Vít |last2=Kopeček |first2=Lubomír |title=How to run an efficient political machine: the billionaire Andrej Babiš and his political-business project |journal=Politics in Central Europe |date=2019 |volume=15 |issue=1 |pages=35–54 |doi=10.2478/pce-2019-0002|doi-access=free}}
  • Dawn of Direct Democracy (Tomio Okamura){{cite journal |last1=Kubát |first1=Michal |last2=Hartliński |first2=Maciej |title=Party Leaders in the Czech Populist Parties and Movements |journal=Polish Political Science Review |date=2019 |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=107–119 |doi=10.2478/ppsr-2019-0007 |doi-access=free }}
  • Freedom and Direct Democracy (Tomio Okamura)

==Finland==

  • Finns Party{{cite journal |last1=Arter |first1=David |last2=Kestilä-Kekkonen |first2=Elina |title=Measuring the Extent of Party Institutionalisation: The Case of a Populist Entrepreneur Party |journal=West European Politics |date=2014 |volume=37 |issue=5 |pages=932–956 |doi=10.1080/01402382.2014.911486 }}

==France==

==Hungary==

==Italy==

  • Forza Italia (Silvio Berlusconi){{cite journal |last1=Hopkin |first1=Jonathan |last2=Paolucci |first2=Caterina |title=The business firm model of party organisation: Cases from Spain and Italy |journal=European Journal of Political Research |date=1999 |volume=35 |issue=3 |pages=307–339 |doi=10.1023/A:1006903925012 |doi-access=free}}{{cite journal |last1=Raniolo |first1=Francesco |title=Forza Italia: A Leader with a Party |journal=South European Society and Politics |date=2006 |volume=11 |issue=3–4 |pages=439–455 |doi=10.1080/13608740600856470 }}{{cite book |last1=Bonnet |first1=Nicolas |title=Leadership and Uncertainty Management in Politics: Leaders, Followers and Constraints in Western Democracies |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan UK |isbn=978-1-137-43924-6 |pages=93–110 |language=en |chapter=Silvio’s Party|date=11 August 2015 }}
  • Popolo della Libertà (Berlusconi){{cite journal |last1=McDonnell |first1=Duncan |title=Silvio Berlusconi's Personal Parties: From Forza Italia to the Popolo Della Libertà |journal=Political Studies |date=2013 |volume=61 |issue=1_suppl |pages=217–233 |doi=10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.01007.x }}
  • Italy of Values (Antonio Di Pietro){{cite journal |last1=Vercesi |first1=Michelangelo |title=Owner parties and party institutionalisation in Italy: is the Northern League exceptional? |journal=Modern Italy |date=2015 |volume=20 |issue=4 |pages=395–410 |doi=10.1017/S1353294400014848 }}

==Lithuania==

  • Labour Party (Viktor Uspaskich){{cite book |doi=10.1007/978-3-030-41916-5_7 |chapter=Collapse or Survival: The Organisational Resilience of Entrepreneurial Parties |title=The Rise of Entrepreneurial Parties in European Politics |date=2020 |last1=Hloušek |first1=Vít |last2=Kopeček |first2=Lubomír |last3=Vodová |first3=Petra |pages=173–185 |isbn=978-3-030-41915-8 }}

==Netherlands==

==Norway==

  • Progress Party (Anders Lange){{cite book |doi=10.1057/978-1-137-58197-6_7 |chapter=The Norwegian Progress Party: Between a Business Firm and a Mass Party |title=Understanding Populist Party Organisation |date=2016 |last1=Jupskås |first1=Anders Ravik |pages=159–187 |isbn=978-1-137-58196-9 }}

==Poland==

  • Modern (Ryszard Petru)
  • Kukiz'15 (Paweł Kukiz){{cite journal |last1=Kosowska-Gąstoł |first1=Beata |last2=Sobolewska-Myślik |first2=Katarzyna |title=New Political Entrepreneurs in Poland |journal=Politologický časopis - Czech Journal of Political Science |date=2017 |volume=24 |issue=2 |pages=137–157 |doi=10.5817/PC2017-2-137 |url=https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84466401.pdf}}
  • Palikot Movement (Janusz Palikot)

==Romania==

  • People's Party – Dan Diaconescu (Dan Diaconescu){{cite journal |last1=Gherghina |first1=Sergiu |last2=Soare |first2=Sorina Cristina |title=From TV to Parliament: The Successful Birth and Progressive Death of a Personal Party |journal=Politologický časopis - Czech Journal of Political Science |date=2017 |volume=XXIV |issue=2 |pages=201–220 |id={{CEEOL|536744}} |doi=10.5817/PC2017-2-201 }}

==Serbia==

  • Strength of Serbia Movement (Bogoljub Karić){{cite book |last1=Orlović |first1=Slaviša |title=Partije i izbori u Srbiji: 20 godina |date=2011 |publisher=Fondacija Friedrich Ebert Stiftung |isbn=978-86-84031-49-7 |oclc=785849369 |page=171 |language=sr }}

==Slovakia==

  • We Are Family (Boris Kollár){{cite journal|last=Brunnerová|first= Olga|date= 2019|title=Not all political entrepreneurs are created equal: The institutionalisation of entrepreneurial parties in Central Europe|journal= Central European Journal of Politics|volume= 5 |issue=1|pages= 100–124|url=http://www.cejop.cz/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019_Vol-05_No-01_Art-06_SK_Brunnerova.pdf}}
  • Slovakia (Igor Matovič)
  • Freedom and Solidarity (Richard Sulík)

==Spain==

==Switzerland==

  • Ticino League (Giuliano Bignasca){{cite journal |last1=Mazzoleni |first1=Oscar |last2=Voerman |first2=Gerrit |title=Memberless parties: Beyond the business-firm party model? |journal=Party Politics |date=2017 |volume=23 |issue=6 |pages=783–792 |doi=10.1177/1354068815627398 |url=https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/50702511/1354068815627398_1_.pdf }}

=Oceania=

==Australia==

  • Tasmanian Independent Senator Brian Harradine Group (Brian Harradine)
  • John Madigan's Manufacturing and Farming Party
  • Katter's Australian Party (Bob Katter){{cite news|url=https://theconversation.com/berlusconi-katter-and-assange-a-very-personal-party-13164|title=Berlusconi, Katter and Assange: a very personal party|publisher=The Conversation|date=16 April 2013|access-date=30 August 2020}}
  • Palmer United Party (Clive Palmer){{cite journal |last1=Kefford |first1=Glenn |last2=McDonnell |first2=Duncan |title=Inside the personal party: Leader-owners, light organizations and limited lifespans |journal=The British Journal of Politics and International Relations |date=2018 |volume=20 |issue=2 |pages=379–394 |doi=10.1177/1369148117750819}}{{cite book |last1=Kelly |first1=Norm |title=Party Rules? |publisher=ANU Press |isbn=978-1-76046-076-1 |pages=73–100 |chapter=Party registration and political participation: Regulating small and 'micro' parties |year=2016 |jstor=j.ctt1rrd7k8.10 |doi=10.22459/PR.10.2016.03 |doi-access=free }}
  • Glenn Lazarus Team (Glenn Lazarus)
  • Jacqui Lambie Network (Jacqui Lambie)
  • David Pocock (David Pocock){{cite web |title=Why does David have a party if he's an independent? |url=https://www.davidpocock.com.au/why_does_david_have_a_party_if_he_s_an_independent |publisher=David Pocock}}
  • Pauline Hanson's One Nation (Pauline Hanson)

=South America=

==Peru==

See also

References

{{reflist}}

Sources

  • {{cite book |doi=10.1007/978-3-319-59348-7 |title=Political Leaders Beyond Party Politics |date=2018 |last1=Musella |first1=Fortunato |isbn=978-3-319-59347-0 }}

Further reading

  • {{cite journal |last1=Harmel |first1=Robert |last2=Svåsand |first2=Lars |title=Party leadership and party institutionalisation: Three phases of development |journal=West European Politics |date=1993 |volume=16 |issue=2 |pages=67–88 |doi=10.1080/01402389308424961 }}
  • {{cite book |last1=Krouwel |first1=André |title=Party Transformations in European Democracies |date=2012 |publisher=State University of New York Press |isbn=978-1-4384-4481-9 |id={{Project MUSE|20584|type=book}} |jstor=jj.18253792 }}
  • {{cite journal |last1=Krašovec |first1=Alenka |title=A Hint at Entrepreneurial Parties? The Case of Four New Successful Parties in Slovenia |journal=Politologický časopis - Czech Journal of Political Science |date=2017 |volume=XXIV |issue=2 |pages=158–178 |id={{CEEOL|536735}} |doi=10.5817/PC2017-2-158 }}

Category:Types of political parties