Cimolesta

{{Short description|Extinct order of mammals}}

{{Automatic taxobox

| name = Cimolesta

| taxon = Cimolesta

| image = Palaeosinopa.jpg

| image_caption = Palaeospinopa from Wyoming Eocene

| fossil_range = ~{{Fossilrange|80|28.4|earliest=83.6}} Late Cretaceous – Early Oligocene{{Cite web|title=Cimolesta|url=https://paleobiodb.org/classic/checkTaxonInfo?taxon_no=40218&is_real_user=1|access-date=2021-08-13|website=paleobiodb.org}}

| authority = {{Harvnb|McKenna|1975}}

| subdivision_ranks = Subgroups

| subdivision = *Pantolesta?

• Pantolestidae
• Paroxyclaenidae
• Dulcidon
• Paroxyclaeninae
• Kiinkerishella
• Kopidodon
• Paraspaniella
• Paroxyclaenus
• Pugiodens
• Sororodon
• Spaniella
• Vulpavoides
• Merialinae
• Euhookeria
• Fratrodon
• Merialus
• Procerberus
• Cimolestidae
• Aboletylestes
• Acmeodon
• Alveugena
• Ambilestes
• Avunculus
• Bagalestes
• Betonnia
• Chacopterygus
• Cimolestes
• Didelphodus
• Gelastops
• Ilerdoryctes
• Maelestes
• Naranius
• Nyssodon
• Paleotomus
• Procerberus
• Protentomodon
• Puercolestes
• Scollardius
• Suratilestes
• Telacodon
• Tinerhodon
• Tsaganius
• Palaeoryctidae?
• Taeniodonta?

}}

Cimolesta is an extinct order of non-placental eutherian mammals.{{Cite journal

| last1 = Rook | first1 = D.L.

| last2 = Hunter | first2 = J.P.

| title = Rooting Around the Eutherian Family Tree: the Origin and Relations of the Taeniodonta

| year = 2013 | journal = Journal of Mammalian Evolution | pages = 1–17

| doi = 10.1007/s10914-013-9230-9 | volume=21| s2cid = 17074668

}} Cimolestans had a wide variety of body shapes, dentition and lifestyles, though the majority of them were small to medium-sized general mammals that bore superficial resemblances to rodents, lagomorphs, mustelids, and marsupials.

Several groups have previously been suggested to have descended from the Cimolesta: the Pholidota (which would have been regarded as a suborder of Cimolesta), the Creodonta, and the Carnivora. The origins of the enigmatic Pantodonta, Tillodonta and Dinocerata have all been suggested to lie within the Cimolesta as well. However, recent studies have revealed that cimolestans are more likely to be basal, non-placental eutherians, with no living descendants.

Some experts had placed the pangolins within Cimolesta, though the current consensus is that the pangolins should be placed within their own order, Pholidota, as a sister taxon to Carnivora within Ferae.{{cite journal |last1=Murphy | title = Resolution of the Early Placental Mammal Radiation Using Bayesian Phylogenetics | journal = Science | volume = 294 | issue = 5550 | pages = 2348–2351 | date = 2001-12-14 | doi = 10.1126/science.1067179 | pmid = 11743200 |first1=Willian J. | display-authors = 2 |last2=O'Brien |first2=SJ |last3=Madsen |first3=O |last4=Scally |first4=M |last5=Douady |first5= CJ |last6=Teeling |first6=E |last7=Ryder |first7=OA |last8=Stanhope |first8=MJ|bibcode = 2001Sci...294.2348M | s2cid = 34367609 }}{{cite journal|last=Beck|first=Robin MD|author2=Bininda-Emonds, Olaf RP |author3=Cardillo, Marcel |author4=Liu, Fu-Guo |author5= Purvis, Andy |title=A higher-level MRP supertree of placental mammals|journal=BMC Evolutionary Biology|year=2006|volume=6|issue=1|pages=93|doi=10.1186/1471-2148-6-93|url= |pmid=17101039|pmc=1654192 |doi-access=free }} Some have also placed the enigmatic family Ptolemaiidae within Cimolesta, also due to similarities between dental and skull anatomies with those of Pantolesta. If the ptolemaiids were indeed cimolestids, then Cimolesta would have ranged from the Late Cretaceous to the early Miocene, when the last ptolemaiid, Kelba, disappeared in Eastern Africa. However, more thorough studies suggest that the ptolemaiids were more probably afrotheres related to aardvarks, tenrecs and golden moles.{{cite journal |vauthors=Cote S, Werdelin L, Seiffert ER, Barry JC |title=Additional material of the enigmatic Early Miocene mammal Kelba and its relationship to the order Ptolemaiida |journal=Proc Natl Acad Sci USA |volume=104 |issue=13 |pages=5510–5 |date=March 2007 |pmid=17372202 |pmc=1838468 |doi=10.1073/pnas.0700441104 |bibcode = 2007PNAS..104.5510C |doi-access=free }}

{{cite journal|last=Seiffert|first=Erik R|title=A new estimate of afrotherian phylogeny based on simultaneous analysis of genomic, morphological, and fossil evidence|journal=BMC Evolutionary Biology|year=2007|volume=7|issue=1|pages=224|doi=10.1186/1471-2148-7-224|url= |pmid=17999766|pmc=2248600 |doi-access=free }} If one ignores the ptolemaiids as afrotherians, then the last, unequivocal cimolestids, the pantolestids Gobiopithecus and Kiinkerishella, died out during the Late Eocene or early Oligocene.

The cimolestid Procerberus may have been closely related to Taeniodonta.Clemens, W. A. (2017). Procerberus (Cimolestidae, Mammalia) from the Latest Cretaceous and Earliest Paleocene of the Northern Western Interior, USA. PaleoBios, 34, 1-26. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1dv645n5Eberle, J. J. (1999). Bridging the transition between didelphodonts and taeniodonts. Journal of Paleontology, 73, 936-944.Schoch, R. M. 1986. Systematics, functional morphology, and macroevolution of the extinct mammalian order Taeniodonta. Peabody Museum Bulletin, 42:1-307LILLEGRAVEN, J. A. 1969. Latest Cretaceous mammals of upper part of Edmonton Formation of Alberta, and review of marsupial-placental dichotomy in mammalian evolution. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, 50(Vertebrata 12), 122.MIDDLETON, M. D. 1983. Early Paleocene vertebrates of the Denver Basin, Colorado. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, 404. Procerberus was the largest cimolestid and different species may be closer to conoryctid taeniodonts and others to stylinodontine taeniodonts. However, Procerberus has been found by cladistic analysis to be outside of a Taeniodonta + Alveugena carbonensis, with Procerberus grandis being closer to that clade than to other Procerberus species.