Free Democratic Party (Germany)

{{more citations needed section|date=September 2013}}

{{Unreferenced section|date=September 2024}}

The history of liberal parties in Germany dates back to 1861, when the German Progress Party (DFP) was founded, being the first political party in the modern sense in Germany. From the establishment of the National Liberal Party in 1867 until the demise of the Weimar Republic in 1933, the liberal-democratic camp was divided into a national-liberal and a left-liberal line of tradition. After 1918, the national-liberal strain was represented by the German People's Party (DVP), the left-liberal one by the German Democratic Party (DDP, which merged into the German State Party in 1930). Both parties played an important role in government during the Weimar Republic era, but successively lost votes during the rise of the Nazi Party beginning in the late-1920s. After the Nazi seizure of power, both liberal parties agreed to the Enabling Act of 1933 and subsequently dissolved themselves. During the 12 years of Hitler's rule, some former liberals collaborated with the Nazis (e.g. economy minister Hjalmar Schacht), while others resisted actively against Nazism, with some Liberal leaning members and former members of the military joining up with Henning von Tresckow (e.g. the Solf Circle).

Soon after World War II, the Soviet Union pushed for the creation of licensed anti-fascist parties in its occupation zone in East Germany. In July 1945, former DDP politicians Wilhelm Külz, Eugen Schiffer, and Waldemar Koch called for the establishment of a pan-German liberal party. Their Liberal-Democratic Party (LDP) was soon licensed by the Soviet Military Administration in Germany, under the condition that the new party joined the pro-Soviet Democratic Bloc.

In September 1945, citizens in Hamburg—including the anti-Nazi resistance circle Association Free Hamburg—established the Party of Free Democrats (PFD) as a bourgeois left-wing party and the first liberal Party in the Western occupation zones. The German Democratic Party was revived in some states of the Western occupation zones (in the Southwestern states of Württemberg-Baden and Württemberg-Hohenzollern under the name of Democratic People's Party).

Many former members of DDP and DVP however agreed to finally overcome the traditional split of German liberalism into a national-liberal and a left-liberal branch, aiming for the creation of a united liberal party.{{Cite book |first=Alf |last=Mintzel |title=Besatzungspolitik und Entwicklung der bürgerlichen Parteien in den Westzonen (1945–1949) |editor-first=Dietrich |editor-last=Staritz |publisher=Leske + Budrich |year=1976 |page=79}} In October 1945 a liberal coalition party was founded in the state of Bremen under the name of Bremen Democratic People's Party. In January 1946, liberal state parties of the British occupation zone merged into the Free Democratic Party of the British Zone (FDP). A similar state party in Hesse, called the Liberal Democratic Party, was licensed by the U.S. military government in January 1946. In the state of Bavaria, a Free Democratic Party was founded in May 1946.

In the first post-war state elections in 1946, liberal parties performed well in Württemberg-Baden (16.8%), Bremen (18.3%), Hamburg (18.2%) and Greater Berlin (still undivided; 9.3%). The LDP was especially strong in the October 1946 state elections of the Soviet zone—the last free parliamentary election in East Germany—obtaining an average of 24.6% (highest in Saxony-Anhalt, 29.9%, and Thuringia, 28.5%), thwarting an absolute majority of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED) that was favoured by the Soviet occupation power. This disappointment to the Communists led to a change of electoral laws in the Soviet zone, cutting the autonomy of non-socialist parties including the LDP and forcing it to join the SED-dominated National Front, making it a dependent bloc party.

The Democratic Party of Germany (DPD) was established in Rothenburg ob der Tauber on 17 March 1947 as a pan-German party of liberals from all four occupation zones. Its leaders were Theodor Heuss (representing the DVP of Württemberg-Baden in the American zone) and Wilhelm Külz (representing the LDP of the Soviet zone). However, the project failed in January 1948 as a result of disputes over Külz's pro-Soviet direction.

File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1983-098-20a, Heuss.jpg

The Free Democratic Party was established on 11–12 December 1948 in Heppenheim, in Hesse, as an association of all 13 liberal state parties in the three Western zones of occupation.These regionally organised liberal parties were the Bremian Democratic People's Party (BDV) in the state of Bremen, the Democratic Party of Southern and Middle Baden (DemP) in the State of South Baden, the Democratic Party (DP) in the State of Rhineland-Palatinate, the Democratic People's Party of Northern Württemberg-Northern Baden (DVP) in the State of Württemberg-Baden, the Democratic People's Party of Southern Württemberg-Hohenzollern (DVP) in the State of Württemberg-Hohenzollern, the united Free Democratic Party (F.D.P.) of the British zone of occupation (consisting of five state associations), the Free Democratic Party (F.D.P.) in the Free State of Bavaria, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in the State of Hesse, and the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) of West Berlin. Cf. Almut Leh and Alexander von Plato, Ein unglaublicher Frühling: erfahrene Geschichte im Nachkriegsdeutschland 1945–1948, Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung (ed.), Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung, 1997, p. 77. {{ISBN|3-89331-298-6}}{{Cite web|url= http://www.freiheit.org/files/288/1948_Heppenheimer_Proklamation.pdf|title= Heppenheimer Proklamation der Freien Demokratischen Partei|trans-title= Heppenheim Proclamation of the Free Democratic Party|date= 12 December 1948|access-date= 12 November 2013|url-status= dead|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150903224113/http://www.freiheit.org/files/288/1948_Heppenheimer_Proklamation.pdf|archive-date= 3 September 2015}} As such, the party included former members of the pre-1933 German People's Party (DVP) which represented the more conservative and national tradition of German liberalism and members from the social liberal German Democratic Party (DDP). The proposed name, Liberal Democratic Party, was rejected by the delegates, who voted 64 to 25 in favour of the name Free Democratic Party (FDP).

The party's first chairman was Theodor Heuss, a member of the Democratic People's Party in Württemberg-Baden; his deputy was Franz Blücher of the FDP in the British Zone. The place for the party's foundation was chosen deliberately: the "Heppenheim Assembly" was held at the Hotel Halber Mond on 10 October 1847, a meeting of moderate liberals who were preparing for what would be, within a few months, the German revolutions of 1848–1849.

File:Schlußstrich drunter - FDP election campaign poster, Germany 1949.jpg, disenfranchisement, disempowerment, second class citizenship" and for "equality of civil rights"]]

In the first elections to the Bundestag on 14 August 1949, the FDP won a vote share of 11.9 percent (with 12 direct mandates, particularly in Baden-Württemberg and Hesse), and thus obtained 52 of 402 seats. In September of the same year the FDP chairman Theodor Heuss was elected the first President of the Federal Republic of Germany. In his 1954 re-election, he received the best election result to date of a President with 871 of 1018 votes (85.6 percent) of the Federal Assembly. Adenauer was also elected on the proposal of the new German President with an extremely narrow majority as the first Chancellor. The FDP participated with the CDU/CSU and the national-conservative German Party (DP) in Adenauer's coalition cabinet; they had three ministers: Franz Blücher (Vice-Chancellor), Thomas Dehler (justice), and Eberhard Wildermuth (housing).

On the most important economic, social and German national issues, the FDP agreed with their coalition partners, the CDU/CSU. However, the FDP offered to middle-class voters a secular party that refused the religious schools and accused the opposition parties of clericalization. The FDP said they were known also as a consistent representative of the market economy, while the CDU was then dominated nominally from the Ahlen Programme, which allowed a Third Way between capitalism and socialism. Ludwig Erhard, the father of the social market economy, had his followers in the early years of the Federal Republic in the CDU/CSU rather than in the FDP. The FDP won Hesse's 1950 state election with 31.8 percent, the best result in its history, through appealing to East Germans displaced by the war by including them on their ticket.

Up to the 1950s, several of the FDP's regional organizations were to the right of the CDU/CSU, particularly the Hesse, Lower Saxony, and North Rhine-Westphalia branches where Friedrich Middelhauve tried to foster a National Rally as a third bloc next to Social Democrats and Christian Democrats. This was criticized by the social liberals around Theodor Heuss who distanced himself from the "Nazi FDP" branches.{{Cite web |last=Blasius |first=Rainer |date=2011-02-23 |title=Nazi-Liberale: Lumpensammler von Opladen |url=https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/politik/nazi-liberale-lumpensammler-von-opladen-1597391.html |access-date=2024-12-26 |website=FAZ.NET |language=de}} Under the influence of the party's right wing, the Free Democrats campaigned against West Germany's denazification provisions and courted even former office-holders of the Third Reich with nationalist values. At their party conference in Munich in 1951, they demanded the release of all "so-called war criminals" and welcomed the establishment of the "Association of German soldiers" of former Wehrmacht and SS members to advance the integration of the Nazi forces in democracy. These FDP members were seen as part of the far-right extremist block along with the German Party in West Germany by the US intelligence officials.{{Cite web|url=https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1952-54v07p1/d161|title=Foreign Relations of the United States, 1952–1954, Germany and Austria, Volume VII, Part 1 |publisher=Office of the Historian, State Department|location=United States}} The 1953 Naumann Circle, named after Werner Naumann, consisted of a group of former Nazis who tried to infiltrate the party. After the British occupation authorities had arrested seven prominent members of the Naumann Circle, the FDP federal board installed a commission of inquiry, chaired by Thomas Dehler, which particularly sharply criticized the situation in the North Rhine-Westphalian FDP. In the following years, the right wing lost power, and the extreme right increasingly sought areas of activity outside the FDP. In the 1953 federal election, the FDP received 9.5 percent of the party votes, 10.8 percent of the primary vote (with 14 direct mandates, particularly in Hamburg, Lower Saxony, Hesse, Württemberg, and Bavaria) and 48 of 487 seats.{{citation needed|date=June 2021}}

In the second term of the Bundestag, the South German Liberal Democrats gained influence in the party controlling the party leadership between 1954 and 1960.{{Citation needed|date=March 2014}} Thomas Dehler, a representative of a more social-liberal course from Bavaria took over as party and parliamentary leader. The former Minister of Justice Dehler, who in 1933 suffered persecution by the Nazis, was known for his populist rhetorics and tried to emancipate the party from Adenauer's CDU/CSU. In the mid-1950s, there were some disagreements between Dehler and Adenauer over foreign policy issues, particularly the founding of the European Defence Community and the Saar statute. The FDP took an emphatically nationalist stance on both issues.{{Cite book |last=Weipert |first=Matthias |title=„Verantwortung für das Allgemeine“? Bundespräsident Theodor Heuss und die FDP |publisher=Stiftung Bundespräsident-Theodor-Heuss-Haus |year=2009 |isbn=978-3-9809603-7-3 |location=Stuttgart}} In 1956, the infights between Dehler and Adenauer culminated in a government crisis: The FDP in North Rhine-Westphalia terminated their alliance with the Christian Democrats and formed a new state government with the Social Democratic Party of Germany and the German Center Party which led to a party split. 16 members of parliament, including former party leader Franz Blücher and the four federal ministers from the FDP left their party and founded the short-lived Free People's Party (FVP). Whilst the FVP continued the government coalition with Adenauer's CDU/CSU and merged with the right-wing German Party in 1957, the FDP took it to the opposition for the first time in its history.

Only one of the smaller post-war parties, the FDP survived despite many problems. In the 1957 federal elections they still reached 7.7 percent of the vote and held 41 of 497 seats in the Bundestag. However, they still remained in opposition because the Union won an absolute majority. At the federal party meeting in Berlin at the end of January 1957, Thomas Dehler was replaced as party chairman by another liberal democrat from South Germany, Reinhold Maier, who was able to stabilize his party before he made way for Erich Mende from North Rhine-Westphalia in 1960. With Mende as party leader the FDP went into the 1961 federal election with the promise of ending Konrad Adenauer's leadership and gained 12.8 percent nationwide, the best result until then. After the election, however, the FDP again formed a coalition with Adenauer's CDU on the condition that he would retire as chancellor after two years. These events led to the FDP being nicknamed the {{lang|de|Umfallerpartei}} ("pushover party").{{cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OThqlaLQjFIC&pg=PA65 |page=66 |title=Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Eine Bilanz nach 60 Jahren |isbn=978-3-412-20237-8 |last1=Schwarz |first1=Hans-Peter |year=2008 |publisher=Böhlau }} In the 1962 Spiegel affair, the FDP temporarily withdrew their ministers from the federal government forcing Defence Minister Franz-Josef Strauß to resign. In accordance with his agreement with the FDP, Adenauer resigned from his chancellorship in October 1963, making place for Ludwig Erhard who appointed FDP leader Erich Mende as Vice Chancellor and Minister of All-German Affairs.

In the 1965 federal elections the FDP gained 9.5 percent. The Free Democrats initially renewed their alliance with the CDU under Erhard but the coalition broke up in 1966 on the issue of tax increases. During the 1966-1969 Grand coalition the party led the opposition. Under their new chairman, Walter Scheel, there were signs of a change both in foreign policy and in party strategy: For the first time, the FDP opened up to a coalition with the SPD on a federal level, embracing foreign minister Willy Brandt's Ostpolitik.

{{Unreferenced section|date=September 2024}}

File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1989-047-20, Walter Scheel.jpg served as Foreign Minister, Vice Chancellor, Acting Chancellor and President of Germany.]]

The 1969 West German federal election led to the first social-liberal coalition between Social Democrats and Free Democrats in German post-war history. Even though the Christian Democrats won the election, the Free Democrats rejected a new centre-right alliance and opted for a centre-left coalition under the new Chancellor Willy Brandt. With FDP leader Walter Scheel as Vice Chancellor and Foreign Minister, the liberals initiated a new controversial Ostpolitik effectively normalizing relations between capitalist-democratic West Germany and communist-led East Germany. Within the FDP, this policy was quite controversial, especially after the de facto recognition of the Oder-Neisse line by the 1970 Treaty of Warsaw.

In July 1970, right-wing members founded a "non-partisan" organization called the National-Liberal Action with the goal of breaking up the SPD/FDP coalition government. A little later, members of parliament Siegfried Zoglmann, Heinz Starke and former party leader Erich Mende left the party with Starke and Mende joining the CDU and Zoglmann founding a new splinter party called German Union (Deutsche Union). This led to the 1972 snap elections from which the SPD/FDP government emerged even stronger. In 1974, party leader Walter Scheel was the second Liberal to be elected Federal President after Theodor Heuss. He was succeeded by Interior Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher as the new FDP leader and Foreign Minister who continued the centre-left coalition under new SPD Chancellor Helmut Schmidt.

The party's centre-left strategy was supported by a new party manifesto, the 1971 Freiburg Theses (Freiburger Thesen) which set the party on a progressive and social liberal course. Among other things, the party committed itself to "self-determination", "democratization of society", a "reform of capitalism" and a form of ecoliberalism which prioritized "environmental protection over profit and personal gains".Karl-Hermann Flach, Werner Maihofer und Walter Scheel: Die Freiburger Thesen der Liberalen. Rowohlt, Reinbek 1972, ISBN 3-499-11545-X. However, in 1977, the progressive liberal Freiburg Theses were supplemented and partially revised by the more economically liberal Kiel Theses (Kieler Thesen), effectively setting the party back on a classical liberal course.

Even prior to the 1980 West German federal election, cooperation between Social Democrats and Free Democrats seemed to come to an end but the candidacy of CSU chairman Franz Josef Strauss for chancellor led both parties to once again renew their coalition government.

{{Unreferenced section|date=September 2024}}

In the fall of 1982, the FDP reneged on its coalition agreement with the SPD and instead threw its support behind the CDU/CSU. On 1 October, the FDP and CDU/CSU were able to oust Schmidt and replace him with CDU party chairman Helmut Kohl as the new Chancellor. The coalition change resulted in severe internal conflicts, and the FDP then lost about 20 percent of its 86,500 members, as reflected in the general election in 1983 by a drop from 10.6 percent to 7.0 percent. The members went mostly to the SPD, the Greens and newly formed splinter parties, such as the left-liberal party Liberal Democrats (LD). The exiting members included the former FDP General Secretary and later EU Commissioner Günter Verheugen.

At the party convention in November 1982, the Schleswig-Holstein state chairman Uwe Ronneburger challenged Hans-Dietrich Genscher as party chairman. Ronneburger received 186 of the votes—about 40 percent—and was just narrowly defeated by Genscher who went on to act as party chairman as well as Vice Chancellor and Foreign Minister in the new Kohl government. In the following federal election campaigns during the 1980s and 1990s, the party sided with the CDU and CSU, the main conservative parties in Germany.

in 1980, FDP members who did not agree with the politics of the left-leaning FDP youth organization Young Democrats founded the Young Liberals (JuLis). For a time JuLis and the Young Democrats operated side by side, until the JuLis became the sole official youth wing of the FDP in 1983. The Young Democrats split from the FDP and were left as a party-independent youth organization ultimately merging with a marxist youth group to form the "Young Democrats/Young Left" in 1992.

During the "Peaceful Revolution" of 1989 in the GDR, a couple of new liberal parties emerged from the opposition, like the Free Democratic Party (East Germany) or the German Forum Party. Prior to the March 1990 Volkskammer elections they joined the established Liberal Democratic Party, who had previously acted as a pro-communist bloc party on the side of the SED, to form the Alliance of Free Democrats (BFD). In the Volkskammer election of March 1990 the Association of Free Democrats was heavily supported by the West German FDP and polled 5.28% of the votes. Most of the seats went to Liberal Democratic Party members, whose leader Rainer Ortleb became their parliamentary leader. It then participated in the last GDR government led by Lothar de Maizière. After the Liberal Democratic Party and another former bloc party, the National Democratic Party of Germany, merged into the new party Association of Free Democrats in late March, the several liberal parties all united with the West German FDP in August 1990 to form the first all-German party. The merger brought the Free Democrats a great, albeit short-lived, increase in membership and assets of DM 6.3 million in cash and property.

At the time of reunification, the FDP's objective was a special economic zone in the former East Germany, but the party could not prevail against the CDU/CSU. In the first all-German Bundestag elections, the centre-right Kohl coalition was confirmed, the FDP received 11.0 percent of the valid votes (79 seats) and won in Genscher's city of birth Halle (Saale) the first direct mandate since 1957. During the 1990s, the FDP won between 6.2 and 11 percent of the vote in Bundestag elections.

In the second half of the 1990s, however, the FDP had to contend with a series of electoral defeats at local and state level, which led to it falling out of twelve of the 16 state parliaments and the European Parliament between 1993 and 1995. The party was derisively referred to as the ‘lady without an abdomen’. At the same time, the party was shaken by new infights between the left and right wings. In 1996, Federal Minister of Justice Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, a prominent representative of the party's social liberal wing, resigned in protest to the government's policy of expanding the state's right to interfere in citizens' private domain by means of acoustic observation (Großer Lauschangriff, literally "big eavesdropping attack"). On the other hand, former Public Prosecutor General Alexander von Stahl tried to rebuild the party's national liberal wing in an ultimately failed attempt to bring the FDP onto a right-wing course modelled on Jörg Haider's FPÖ in Austria.{{Cite web |title=Rechtsorientierung der FDP: Der nationalliberale Stammtisch |url=https://www.endstation-rechts.de/news/rechtsorientierung-der-fdp-der-nationalliberale-stammtisch |access-date=2024-12-29 |website=Endstation Rechts. |language=de-DE}}{{Cite web |title=Alexander von Stahl: Möllemanns FDP-Kurs hat nichts mit nationalliberal zu tun - WELT |url=https://www.welt.de/print-welt/article391489/Alexander-von-Stahl-Moellemanns-FDP-Kurs-hat-nichts-mit-nationalliberal-zu-tun.html |access-date=2024-12-29 |website=DIE WELT |language=de}}

These infights contributed to the CDU/CSU-FDP defeat in the 1998 German federal election which ended the 16-year centre-right coalition in Germany and the FDP's nearly three decade reign in government. For the first time since 1969 (apart from a brief period in 1982), the Free Democrats now found themselves in opposition and out of power on a federal level.

Following their electoral defeat, the party developed a strategy of equidistance to the CDU and SPD championed by North Rhine-Westfalia state party leader Jürgen Möllemann who led the party to a good result in the 2000 state elections. At their 2001 party conference in Düsseldorf, outgoing party leader Wolfgang Gerhardt was replaced by a 39 year old Guido Westerwelle who became the youngest FDP leader in history. The party conference also adopted a strategy developed by Möllemann which became known as ‘Project 18’. It aimed at winning new groups of voters through new forms of communication and presentation and at profiling the party as an independent force autonomous from SPD and CDU. The name referred to the electoral goal of tripling the party's share of the vote from 6% to 18%. While Westerwelle and Möllemann generated a lot of media attention, the party was once again embroiled in controversy on Westerwelle's perceived lack of seriousness in his election campaign ("Spaßwahlkampf") and on Möllemann's alleged right-wing populism. Many critics interpreted the use of the number 18 as a hidden right-wing extremist symbol (a code for the letters A and H, meaning Adolf Hitler) and an attempt to attract voters on the far right. In addition, Möllemann launched a leaflet campaign with harsh criticism of the Israeli government under Ariel Sharon and the German-Jewish journalist Michel Friedman, which critics interpreted as anti-Semitism. Amid controversy over a possible right-wing populist orientation associated with this, the FDP ultimately achieved 7.4% instead of the targeted 18 per cent in the 2002 German federal election.File:Freie Demokratische Partei, Deutschland (logo - 2005).svg

In the 2005 general election the party won 9.8 percent of the vote and 61 federal deputies, an unpredicted improvement from prior opinion polls. It is believed that this was partly due to tactical voting by CDU and Christian Social Union of Bavaria (CSU) alliance supporters who hoped for stronger market-oriented economic reforms than the CDU/CSU alliance called for. However, because the CDU did worse than predicted, the FDP and the CDU/CSU alliance were unable to form a coalition government. At other times, for example after the 2002 federal election, a coalition between the FDP and CDU/CSU was impossible primarily because of the weak results of the FDP.

The CDU/CSU parties had achieved the third-worst performance in German postwar history with only 35.2 percent of the votes. Therefore, the FDP was unable to form a coalition with its preferred partners, the CDU/CSU parties. As a result, the party was considered as a potential member of two other political coalitions, following the election. One possibility was a partnership between the FDP, the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) and the Alliance 90/The Greens, known as a "traffic light coalition", named after the colors of the three parties. This coalition was ruled out, because the FDP considered the Social Democrats and the Greens insufficiently committed to market-oriented economic reform. The other possibility was a CDU-FDP-Green coalition, known as a "Jamaica coalition" because of the colours of the three parties. This coalition wasn't concluded either, since the Greens ruled out participation in any coalition with the CDU/CSU. Instead, the CDU formed a Grand coalition with the SPD, and the FDP entered the opposition. FDP leader Guido Westerwelle became the unofficial leader of the opposition by virtue of the FDP's position as the largest opposition party in the Bundestag.

In the 2009 European election, the FDP received 11% of the national vote (2,888,084 votes in total) and returned 12 MEPs.{{cite web|url=http://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/de/europawahlen/EU_BUND_09/ergebnisse/bundesergebnisse//|title=Übersicht|work=bundeswahlleiter.de|access-date=5 February 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923231614/http://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/de/europawahlen/EU_BUND_09/ergebnisse/bundesergebnisse/|archive-date=23 September 2015|url-status=dead}}

In the September 2009 federal elections, the FDP increased its share of the vote by 4.8 percentage points to 14.6%, an all-time record. This percentage was enough to offset a decline in the CDU/CSU's vote compared to 2005, to create a CDU-FDP centre-right governing coalition in the Bundestag with a 53% majority of seats. On election night, party leader Westerwelle said his party would work to ensure that civil liberties were respected and that Germany got an "equitable tax system and better education opportunities".[http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,4728511,00.html Merkel to head new center-right government] Deutsche Welle 27 September 2009.

The party also made gains in the two state elections held at the same time, acquiring sufficient seats for a CDU-FDP coalition in the northernmost state, Schleswig-Holstein,{{cite news |title=CDU and FDP form coalition in Schleswig-Holstein |url=https://www.thelocal.de/20091017/22639/ |newspaper=The Local Germany |publisher=The Local Europe AB |access-date=7 October 2022}} and gaining enough votes in left-leaning Brandenburg to clear the 5% hurdle to enter that state's parliament.{{citation needed|date=March 2016}}

However, after reaching its best ever election result in 2009, the FDP's support collapsed.{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/may/25/germany-liberal-collapse-free-democrats |title=Germany's Liberal Collapse |newspaper=The Guardian |date=24 August 2009 |access-date=3 June 2012 |location=London |first=Hans |last=Kundnani}} The party's policy pledges were put on hold by Merkel as the Great Recession unfolded and with the onset of the European debt crisis in 2010.Brian Parkin and Tony Czuczka (23 September 2013), [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-22/german-king-makers-fdp-face-parliamentary-exile-after-64-years.html German 'King Makers' FDP Face Parliamentary Exile] Bloomberg News. By the end of 2010, the party's support had dropped to as low as 5%. The FDP retained their seats in the state elections in North Rhine-Westphalia, which was held six months after the federal election, but out of the seven state elections that have been held since 2009, the FDP have lost all their seats in five of them due to failing to cross the 5% threshold.{{Cite news|last=Witting|first=Volker|date=25 November 2021|title=Who is Christian Lindner, Germany's new Finance Minister?|work=Deutsche Welle|url=https://www.dw.com/en/who-is-christian-lindner-germanys-new-finance-minister/a-59627580|access-date=20 February 2022}}

Support for the party further eroded amid infighting and an internal rebellion over euro-area bailouts during the debt crisis.Leon Mangasarian (17 September 2013), [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-16/merkel-s-fdp-ally-begs-for-her-party-s-votes-in-survival-fight.html Merkel's FDP Ally Begs for Her Party's Votes in Survival Fight] Bloomberg News.

Westerwelle stepped down as party leader following the 2011 state elections, in which the party was wiped out in Saxony-Anhalt and Rhineland-Palatinate and lost half its seats in Baden-Württemberg. Westerwelle was replaced in May 2011 by Philipp Rösler. Rösler was the first cabinet minister and vice-chancellor of Asian background in Germany. Rösler was the first cabinet minister and vice-chancellor of Asian background in Germany. The change in leadership failed to revive the FDP's fortunes, however, and in the next series of state elections, the party lost all its seats in Bremen, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, and Berlin.{{citation|title=Rot-Grün als "große Koalition"|url=http://www.stern.de/politik/deutschland/nach-der-wahl-in-bremen-eine-rundum-ratlose-kanzlerin-1688143-infographic.html|magazine=Stern|date=23 May 2011|access-date=15 May 2012|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120925082144/http://www.stern.de/politik/deutschland/nach-der-wahl-in-bremen-eine-rundum-ratlose-kanzlerin-1688143-infographic.html|archive-date=25 September 2012}} In Berlin, the party lost nearly 75% of the support they had had in the previous election.{{cite news|url=http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2011/0919/1224304355656.html |title=Berlin pirates force FDP to walk the plank |publisher=Irishtimes.com |date=19 September 2011 |access-date=3 June 2012}}

In March 2012, the FDP lost all their state-level representation in the 2012 Saarland state election. However, this was offset by the Schleswig-Holstein state elections, when they achieved 8% of the vote, which was a severe loss of seats but still over the 5% threshold. In the snap elections in North Rhine-Westphalia a week later, the FDP not only crossed the electoral threshold, but also increased its share of the votes to 2 percentage points higher than in the previous state election. This was attributed to the local leadership of Christian Lindner.{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/14/world/europe/in-rebuke-to-merkel-social-democrats-win-german-vote.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220102/https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/14/world/europe/in-rebuke-to-merkel-social-democrats-win-german-vote.html |archive-date=2 January 2022 |url-access=limited |url-status=live | work=The New York Times | first=Nicholas | last=Kulish | title=Angela Merkel's Party Loses State Election in Germany | date=13 May 2012}}{{cbignore}}

File:FDP_Poster_(2).jpg

The FDP last won a directly elected seat in 1990, in Halle—the only time it has won a directly elected seat since 1957.{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-ACIDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA27 |title=The Left Party in Contemporary German Politics|first1=Dan|last1=Hough|first2=Michael|last2=Koß|first3=Jonathan|last3=Olsen|publisher=Springer|date=2007|isbn=978-0-230-59214-8}} The party's inability to win directly elected seats came back to haunt it at the 2013 election, in which it came up just short of the 5% threshold. With no directly elected seats, the FDP was shut out of the Bundestag for the first time since 1949. After the previous chairman Philipp Rösler then resigned, Christian Lindner took over the leadership of the party.

File:ChristianLindner-FDP-1.jpg is the party chairman, having succeeded Philipp Rösler in December 2013.]]

In the 2014 European parliament elections, the FDP received 3.4% of the national vote (986,253 votes in total) and returned 3 MEPs.{{cite web|url=http://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/de/europawahlen/EU_BUND_14/ergebnisse/bundesergebnisse/ |title=Übersicht |work=bundeswahlleiter.de |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150705072802/http://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/de/europawahlen/EU_BUND_14/ergebnisse/bundesergebnisse/ |archive-date=5 July 2015 }} In the 2014 Brandenburg state election the party experienced a 5.8% down-swing and lost all their representatives in the Brandenburg state parliament. In the 2014 Saxony state election, the party experienced a 5.2% down-swing, again losing all of its seats. In the 2014 Thuringian state election a similar phenomenon was repeated with the party falling below the 5% threshold following a 5.1% drop in popular vote.

The party managed to enter parliament in the 2015 Bremen state election with the party receiving 6.5% of the vote and gaining 6 seats. However, it failed to get into government as a coalition between the Social Democrats and the Greens was created. In the 2016 Mecklenburg-Vorpommern state election the party failed to get into parliament despite increasing its vote share by 0.3%. The party did manage to get into parliament in Baden-Württemberg, gaining 3% of the vote and a total of 12 seats. This represents a five-seat improvement over their previous results. In the 2016 Berlin state election the party gained 4.9% of the vote and 12 seats but still failed to get into government. A red-red-green coalition was instead formed relegating the FDP to the opposition. In the 2016 Rhineland-Palatinate state election, the party managed to enter parliament receiving 6.2% of the vote and 7 seats. It also managed to enter government under a traffic light coalition. In 2016 Saxony-Anhalt state election the party narrowly missed the 5% threshold, receiving 4.9% of the vote and therefore receiving zero seats despite a 1% swing in their favour.

The 2017 North Rhine-Westphalia state election was widely considered a test of the party's future as their chairman Christian Lindner was also leading the party in that state. The party experienced a 4% swing in its favour gaining 6 seats and entering into a coalition with the CDU with a bare majority. In the 2017 Saarland state election the party again failed to gain any seats despite a 1% swing in their favour. The party gained 3 seats and increased its vote share by 3.2% in the 2017 Schleswig-Holstein state election. This success was often credited to their state chairman Wolfgang Kubicki. They also managed to re-enter the government under a Jamaica coalition.

In the 2017 federal election the party scored 10.7% of votes and re-entered the Bundestag, winning 80 seats. After the election, a Jamaica coalition was considered between the CDU, Greens, and FDP. However, FDP chief Christian Lindner walked out of the coalition talks due to a disagreement over European migration policy, saying "It is better not to govern than to govern badly."{{Cite web | url=https://www.dw.com/en/german-election-preliminary-coalition-talks-collapse-after-fdp-walks-out/a-41445987 | title=German election: Preliminary coalition talks collapse after FDP walks out | DW | 19.11.2017 | website=Deutsche Welle }}{{Cite web | url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/nov/19/german-coalition-talks-close-to-collapse-angela-merkel | title=German coalition talks collapse after deadlock on migration and energy | website=TheGuardian.com | date=20 November 2017 }} As a result, the CDU/CSU formed another grand coalition with the SPD.

The FDP won 5.4% and 5 seats in the 2019 European election.

In the October 2019 Thuringian state election, the FDP won seats in the Landtag of Thuringia for the first time since 2009. It exceeded the 5% threshold by just 5 votes.[https://www.thelocal.de/20191028/five-extra-votes-put-free-democrats-in-thuringias-state-parliament How five votes put Germany's Free Democrats in Thuringia state parliament], The Local (28 October 2019). In February 2020, the FDP's Thomas Kemmerich was elected Minister-President of Thuringia by the Landtag with the likely support of the CDU and AfD, becoming the second member of the FDP to serve as head of government in a German state. This was also the first time a head of government had been elected with the support of AfD. Under intense pressure from state and federal politicians, Kemmerich resigned the following day, stating he would seek new elections.{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-51399445|title=Germany AfD: Thuringia PM quits amid fury over far right|publisher=BBC|date=8 February 2020}} The next month, he was replaced by Bodo Ramelow of The Left; the FDP did not run a candidate in the second vote for Minister-President.{{cite news|url=https://www.politico.eu/article/germanys-thuringia-gets-left-wing-state-premier-in-re-run-vote/|title=Germany's 6Thuringia gets left-wing state premier in re-run vote|date=4 March 2020}}

In 2021, the FDP returned to the Saxony-Anhalt state parliament after five years of absence. They had similar success in Baden-Württemberg and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, but faced setbacks in Baden-Württemberg, Berlin and Rhineland-Palatinate.

In the September 2021 federal election, the CDU/CSU under Armin Laschet was defeated. The FDP saw both its vote share and number of seats grow, to 11.5% and 92 seats respectively. As a result, the SPD, Greens, and FDP entered talks to form an Ampelkoalition (traffic light coalition). In the agreement finalized on 24 November, the FDP held four federal ministries in the Scholz cabinet (Finance, Justice, Digital and Transport and Education and Research).{{Cite news | url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/germanys-spd-greens-fdp-present-coalition-deal-wednesday-2021-11-24/ | title=Auf wiedersehen Angela as three-way coalition signs governing pact | newspaper=Reuters | date=24 November 2021 | last1=Rinke | first1=Andreas | last2=Marsh | first2=Sarah }}

After the comeback in the Federal Government, the FDP saw poor approval in national opinion polls, and started falling out of multiple state parliaments. In March 2022, the FDP didn't win any seats in Saarland.{{cite web |date=27 March 2022 |title=Germany: SPD maintains winning streak in Saarland vote |url=https://www.dw.com/en/germany-spd-maintains-winning-streak-in-saarland-vote/a-61271943 |website=Deutsche Welle}} Then in October it lost all 11 of their seats in Lower Saxony.{{cite web |date=9 October 2022 |title=Germany: Lower Saxony election a boost for Chancellor Olaf Scholz |url=https://www.dw.com/en/germany-lower-saxony-election-a-boost-for-chancellor-olaf-scholz/a-63382759 |website=Deutsche Welle}} It also lost all 12 seats in the 2023 Berlin repeat state election,{{cite web |date=13 February 2023 |title=Berlin election win boosts German conservatives |url=https://www.dw.com/en/berlin-election-win-boosts-german-conservatives/a-64690772 |website=Deutsche Welle}} and in May they lost over half their seats in North Rhine-Westphalia and Schleswig-Holstein.{{cite web |date=15 May 2022 |title=Germany: Scholz's party defeated in bellwether North Rhine-Westphalia election |url=https://www.dw.com/en/germany-scholzs-party-defeated-in-bellwether-north-rhine-westphalia-election/a-61803497 |website=Deutsche Welle}} In the 2023 Bavarian state election, where Martin Hagen led the party, it lost all 11 seats.{{Cite web |title=Landtagswahl 2023 in Bayern: Aktuelle Umfrage bestätigt Trend – CSU und Freie Wähler als Regierungskoalition |url=https://www.infranken.de/bayern/landtagswahl-2023-in-bayern-aktuelle-umfrage-bestaetigt-trend-csu-und-freie-waehler-als-regierungskoalition-art-5678354 |access-date=4 May 2023 |website=inFranken.de |language=de}} The FDP were similarly wiped out in the 2024 Thuringian state election, where Thomas Kemmerich lost his party's 5 seats,{{Cite web |date=2024-09-01 |title=German far right wins first major election since World War II |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-far-right-elections-victory-afd-cdu-olaf-scholz/ |access-date=2024-09-05 |website=POLITICO |language=en-GB}} again in the 2024 Saxony state election, where the FDP achieved less than 1% of the vote,{{Cite web |date=2024-09-02 |title=AfD victory in Thuringia: Scholz urges 'firewall' to keep out far right |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd05pdmzgp5o |access-date=2024-09-05 |website=BBC News |language=en-GB}} and lastly in the 2025 Hamburg state election, where the party lost its last constituency sit,{{Cite web |title=FDP digests another major loss – DW – 03/03/2025 |url=https://www.dw.com/en/fdp-digests-another-major-loss/liveblog-post-71811948 |access-date=2025-03-04 |website=dw.com |language=en}} making a total of six states where the party was wiped out since 2021.

In the 2024 European Parliament elections the party kept on 5 seats, coming in sixth, behind the newly formed BSW.

In November 2024, Christian Lindner was fired as Minister of Finance.{{Cite web |title=Kanzler Scholz entlässt Finanzminister Lindner |url=https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/eilmeldung-ampelregierung-scholz-entlaesst-lindner-100.html |access-date=2024-11-06 |website=Tagesschau |language=de}} The FDP leaving the coalition meant the collapse of the traffic light government.{{Cite web |date=2024-11-06 |title=German government coalition collapses as Scholz sacks Finance Minister Lindner |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-coalition-government-collapse-olaf-scholz-finance-minister-christian-lindner/ |access-date=2024-11-06 |website=POLITICO |language=en-GB}} With the crisis taking place the four ministries held by the party were lost, as Marco Buschmann and Bettina Stark-Watzinger resigned.{{Cite news |last1=Scheib |first1=Katrin |last2=Daniel |first2=Isabelle |last3=AFP |date=2024-11-07 |title=Zukunft der Bundesregierung: Wissing übernimmt Justizministerium, Özdemir Bildungsministerium |url=https://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2024-11/wissing-uebernimmt-justizministerium-oezdemir-bildungsministerium |access-date=2024-11-11 |work=Die Zeit |language=de-DE |issn=0044-2070}} However, Digital and Transport minister Volker Wissing decided to resign from the FDP instead in order to stay in cabinet.{{Cite web |title= Political wrangling starts after German coalition collapse – DW – 11/07/2024|website=Deutsche Welle |url=https://www.dw.com/en/political-wrangling-starts-after-german-coalition-collapse/a-70725678}} On the same month controversy was sparked after Die Zeit and Süddeutsche Zeitung reported that the crisis was in fact a deliberate strategy by the FDP, planned for weeks in advance, in a paper with heavy use of militaristic terminology, including the word D-Day, a reference to allied invasion of Normany during WWII.{{Cite news |last=Pausch |first=Robert |date=2024-11-15 |title=FDP: Das liberale Drehbuch für den Regierungssturz |url=https://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2024-11/christian-lindner-ampel-aus-fdp-bundesregierung |access-date=2025-03-04 |work=Die Zeit |language=de-DE |issn=0044-2070}} The reports contradicted declarations by the party leader Lindner on Scholz "calculated break" of the governing coalition.{{Cite web |last=Zimmermann |first=Jan |title=Wie die "D-Day"-Affäre der FDP schadet |url=https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/fdp-djir-sarai-ampelaus-dday-100.html |access-date=2025-03-04 |website=tagesschau.de |language=de}}

In the subsequent snap election, FDP failed to reach the 5% threshold needed for parliamentary representation and as a result lost all their seats in Bundestag again. Christian Lindner and Wolfgang Kubicki would resign from party leadership.{{Cite web |last=Polansky |first=Martin |title=Die FDP fliegt aus dem Bundestag - und blickt in den Abgrund |url=https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/bundestagswahl/fdp-aus-lindner-100.html |access-date=2025-02-24 |website=tagesschau.de |language=de}}{{Cite web |last=tagesschau.de |title=FDP-Chef Lindner kündigt Rückzug aus Politik an |url=https://www.tagesschau.de/eilmeldung/lindner-rueckzug-politik-100.html |access-date=2025-02-24 |website=tagesschau.de |language=de}}

File:FDP Mitgliederentwicklung.svg

{{liberalism sidebar}}

The FDP's political position has variously been described as centrist,{{cite book|editor1=Donald P. Green |editor2=Bradley Palmquist |editor3=Eric Schickler |title=Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters |quote=In Germany, the centrist FDP has often held the balance of power in coalition governments, allying with either the SPD or the CDU/ CSU. |date=2002 |page=188 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0-300-13200-7 }}{{cite news|url=https://www.ft.com/content/6d448ac6-a163-11e7-b797-b61809486fe2 |title=AfD takes hard-right nationalism to heart of German democracy |quote=Christian Lindner, head of the centrist FDP party, said that from his experience in his home state, North Rhine-Westphalia, whenever it came to tough work of drawing up laws, "the AfD MPs were always to be found in the cafeteria". |work=Financial Times |date=24 September 2017 |access-date=16 February 2023}} centre-right,{{refn|{{cite book|author=Laura Block|title=Policy Frames on Spousal Migration in Germany: Regulating Membership, Regulating the Family|year=2016|publisher=Springer Nature|isbn=978-3-658-13296-5|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=71veCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA205|page=205}}{{cite book|editor=Erol Külahci |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=H8T9AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA35 |title=Europeanisation and Party Politics: How the EU affects Domestic Actors, Patterns and Systems |quote=German politics ultimately evolved from an impressively stable two-and-a-half party system – the CDU-CSU, the SPD and the centre-right Free Democratic Party – in the fifty years after the formation of the Federal Republic ... |date=2014 |page=35 |publisher=ECPR Press |isbn=978-1-907301-84-1 }}{{cite web |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/new-besties-german-greens-fdp-cosy-up-build-coalition-2021-09-29/ |title=German Greens, FDP cosy up as coalition dance begins |quote= Both the centre-left SPD and Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservative bloc, which slumped to a record low result, would need the centre-right FDP and leftist Greens as partners to get a parliamentary majority for a coalition government. |date=7 September 2020 |access-date=27 January 2023 |publisher=Reuters}}{{cite web |url=https://www.dw.com/en/bundestag-slams-far-right-afd-reaffirms-holocaust-remembrance/a-42712930 |title=Bundestag slams AfD, reaffirms Holocaust remembrance |quote=Members of the Social Democrats, the center-right Free Democratic Party and the Left Party echoed those sentiments. |date=23 February 2018 |access-date=27 January 2023 |publisher=Deutsche Welle}}}} and right-wing.{{cite web |url=https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/achille-mbembe-and-fantasy-separation/ |title=Achille Mbembe and the fantasy of separation |date=29 May 2020 |access-date=27 January 2023 |publisher=openDemocracy}}{{cite book |editor1=Sona N. Golder |editor2=Ignacio Lago |editor3=André Blais |editor4=Elisabeth Gidengil |editor5=Thomas Gschwend|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xJc4DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA43 |title=Multi-Level Electoral Politics: Beyond the Second-Order Election Model |quote=In Germany, a coalition government composed of the CDU/CSU and the small right-wing FDP was in office at the national level from 2009 to 2013. At the subnational level, a coalition between the CSU and the FDP was in power ... |date=2017 |page=43 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-250917-8 }}{{cite book|author= Peter Egge Langsæther|title=Party Families in Western Europe|publisher= Routledge|year=2023|isbn= 9780429809934|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IqzBEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA1973|page=1973}} The FDP has been described as liberal,{{cite book|author=André Krouwel|chapter=Political Parties|editor1=Neil Robinson|editor2=Rory Costello|title=Comparative European Politics: Distinctive Democracies, Common Challenges|year=2020|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn= 978-0-19-881140-4|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uz0HEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA50|page=50}}{{cite book|first1=Gary|last1=Marks|first2=Carole|last2=Wilson|chapter=National Parties and the Contestation of Europe|editor1=T. Banchoff|editor-first2=Mitchell P.|editor-last2=Smith|title=Legitimacy and the European Union|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GgvLEFPY8l4C&pg=PA123|access-date=26 August 2012|year=1999|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=978-0-415-18188-4|page=123}}{{cite book|first=Sylvia|last=Breukers|title=Changing Institutional Landscapes for Implementing Wind Power: A Geographical Comparison of Institutional Capacity Building: the Netherlands, England and North Rhine-Westphalia|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Y_iPHvjI6vQC&pg=PA188|year=2007|publisher=Amsterdam University Press|isbn=978-90-5629-454-0|page=188}} conservative liberal,{{cite book|first=Hans|last=Slomp|title=European Politics into the Twenty-first Century: Integration and Division|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BIJH_mHgI68C&pg=PA55|year=2000|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|isbn=978-0-275-96800-7|page=55}}{{cite book|first=Hans|last=Slomp|title=Europe, a Political Profile: An American Companion to European Politics|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=V1uzkNq8xfIC&pg=PA377|year=2011|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-0-313-39181-1|page=377}}{{cite book|first=Stephen|last=George|title=Politics and Policy in the European Union|url=https://archive.org/details/politicspolicyin0000geor_x9f6/page/98/mode/2up|date=1996|edition=3rd|publisher=University Press|isbn=978-0-19-878190-5|page=98}}{{cite book|author1=Günter Bischof|author2=Fritz Plasser|title=The Changing Austrian Voter|publisher= Transaction Publishers|year=2008|isbn=978-1-412-81932-9|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EK81N6akyEUC&pg=PA152|page=152}} classical liberal,{{Cite book|first1=Stefan|last1=Immerfall|first2=Andreas|last2=Sobisch|chapter=Party System in Transition|editor-first= Matthias|editor-last= Zimmer|title=Germany: Phoenix in trouble?|year=1997|publisher=University of Alberta|location=Edmonton|isbn=978-0-88864-305-6|page=114}}{{Cite book|first= Arthur B.|last= Gunlicks|title=The Länder and German federalism|year=2003|publisher=Manchester University Press|location=Manchester|isbn=978-0-7190-6533-0|page=268 }}{{cite book|editor-first=Brian|editor-last=Duignan|title=The Science and Philosophy of Politics|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ye-cAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA121|year=2013|publisher=Britannica Educational Publishing|isbn=978-1-61530-748-7|page=121}} and liberal conservative.{{cite book|author=Gordon Smith|chapter=The Moderate Right in the German Party System|editor=Peter H. Merkl|title=The Federal Republic of Germany at Forty-Five: Union without Unity|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ste-DAAAQBAJ&pg=PA269|publisher=Peter Lang|year=1995|isbn=978-1-349-13520-2|pages=269}}{{cite book|author=Ricky Van Oers|title=Deserving Citizenship: Citizenship Tests in Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wWdUAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA263|publisher=Martinus Nijhoff Publishers|year=2013|isbn=978-9-00-425107-6|page=263}}{{cite book|author1=Florian Grotz|author2=Wolfgang Schroeder|title= The Political System of Germany|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|year=2023|isbn=978-3-031-32479-6|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wq7QEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA216|page=216}} Others have described the party as fiscally conservative,{{cite book|author=Christopher S. Allen|

chapter=Ordoliberalism Trumps Keynesianism: Economic Policy in the Federal Republic of Germany and the EU|editor=Bernard H. Moss|title=Monetary Union in Crisis: The European Union as a Neo-Liberal Construction|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|year=2004|isbn=9780230524002|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iPpZCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA214|page=214}} libertarian,{{cite book|author1=Craig Morris|author2=Arne Jungjohann|title=Energy Democracy: Germany's Energiewende to Renewables|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|year=2016|isbn= 978-3-319-31891-2|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6jsEDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA113|page=113}}{{cite book|author= Louise K. Davidson-Schmich|title=Gender Quotas and Democratic Participation: Recruiting Candidates for Elective Offices in Germany|publisher=University of Michigan Press|year=2016|isbn= 978-0-472-11974-5|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gV-2CwAAQBAJ&pg=PA27|page=27}} or right-libertarian.{{cite book |author=Hansen |first=Michael A. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=N2P8EAAAQBAJ&pg=PA119 |title=Political Entrepreneurship in the Age of Dealignment: The Populist Far-right Alternative for Germany |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan |year=2024 |isbn=978-3-031-50890-5 |page=119}}{{cite book |author=Kitschelt |first=Herbert |title=Germany: Beyond the Stable State |publisher=Routledge |year=2004 |isbn=978-1-135-75518-8 |editor1=Herbert Kitschelt |page=127 |chapter=Political-Economic Context and Partisan Strategies in the German Federal Elections, 1990–2002 |editor2=Wolfgang Streeck |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=10KQAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA127}}

The FDP is a predominantly classical-liberal inspired party, both in the sense of supporting free market economic policies and in the sense of policies emphasizing the minimization of government interference in individual affairs.{{refn|{{Cite book|editor= Ruud van Dijk|title=Encyclopedia of the Cold War, Volume 1|year=2008|publisher=Taylor & Francis|location=London|isbn=978-0-415-97515-5|page=541}}Jefferson Chase, [https://www.dw.com/en/what-you-need-to-know-about-germanys-liberals-the-free-democratic-party/a-38645446 What you need to know about Germany's liberals, the Free Democratic Party], Deutsche Welle (24 September 2017).{{Cite book|title=The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany |last=Kommers |first=Donald P. |year=1997 |publisher=Duke University Press |location=Durham |isbn=978-0-8223-1838-5 |page=31 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sHZfkgxtoZQC&pg=PA31 }}{{Cite book|title=European Politics in Transition |last=Kesselman |first=Mark |year=1997 |publisher=D.C. Heath |location=Durham |isbn=978-0-669-24443-4 |page=247 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cwckAQAAIAAJ }}}} During election campaigning, the party has emphasised support for tax cuts, reductions in government spending and balanced budgets.{{cite book|author=Shawn Donnelly|title=Reshaping Economic and Monetary Union: Membership Rules and Budget Policies in Germany, France and Spain|publisher=Manchester University Press|year=2004|isbn=978-0-719-06850-8|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=A0Q9V1YCufwC&pg=PA59|page=59}} The party has also been described by various media sources as neoliberal.{{refn|{{cite news |last= von Hein |first= Matthias |date= 10 August 2021 |title= Germany sends firefighters to wildfires in Greece |url= https://www.dw.com/en/germany-sends-firefighters-to-wildfires-in-greece/a-58823070 |work= Deutsche Welle (DW) |access-date= 27 September 2021}}{{cite news |date= 27 September 2021 |title= Germany votes: Projections give Social Democrats narrow lead |url= https://www.dw.com/en/german-election-2021-results/a-59313269 |work= Deutsche Welle (DW) |access-date= 27 September 2021 |quote= The neoliberal Free Democrats' (FDP) color is yellow}}{{cite magazine |last= Mayer |first= Catherine |date= 17 September 2013 |title= Germany's Elections: Merkel, Europe's Most Important Leader, Faces a Complex Challenge |url= https://world.time.com/2013/09/17/germanys-election-merkel-europes-most-important-leader-faces-a-complex-challenge/ |magazine= Time |access-date= 27 September 2021}}{{cite news |last= Hockenos |first= Paul |date= 21 July 2016 |title= Ax-Wielding Terrorists and Germany's Stiff Upper Lippe |url= https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/21/axe-terrorists-germanys-stiff-upper-lip-islamic-state/ |work= Foreign Policy |access-date= 27 September 2021}}}} Scholars of political science have historically identified the FDP as closer to the CDU/CSU bloc than to the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) on economic issues but closer to the SPD and the Greens on issues such as civil liberties, education, defense, and foreign policy.M. Donald Hancock et al., Politics in Europe (CQ Press, 2015), pp. 265–66. The FDP has oriented itself towards a centrist position between the CDU and the SPD;{{cite book|editor1=Emilie van Haute|editor2=Caroline Close |title=Liberal parties in Europe |quote= ... the classical-liberal German FDP, which has tried to keep a centrist position between the CDU/CSU and the SPD; the social-liberal D66; and the conservative-liberal Fiannal Fail (although it has recently tended to move towards a more ... )|date=2019 }} however, it is to the right of the CDU in its socioeconomics perspective,{{cite book|author=Georg Picot|title=Politics of Segmentation: Party Competition and Social Protection in Europe|publisher=Routledge|year=2013|isbn= 978-1-136-47681-5|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vNrwmI5zuzEC&pg=PT111|page=111}} environmental and labour policies.{{cite book|author1=Thomas König|author2=Bernd Luig|author3=Sven-Oliver Proksch|author4=Jonathan B. Slapin|chapter=Measuring Policy Positive of Veto Players in Parliamentary Democracies|editor=Thomas König|editor2=George Tsebelis|editor3=Marc Debus|title=Reform Processes and Policy Change: Veto Players and Decision-Making in Modern Democracies|publisher= Springer Science & Business Media|year= 2010|isbn=978-1-441-95809-9|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YnLYajh8LxYC&pg=PA89|page=89}}

The party is a traditional supporter of ordoliberalism,{{cite book|author=Charlotte Galpin|title=The Euro Crisis and European Identities: Political and Media Discourse in Germany, Ireland and Poland|year=2017|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-3-319-51611-0|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=G2gpDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA83|page=83}} having been influenced by the economic theories of Wilhelm Röpke and Alexander Rüstow.{{cite book|author=William Callison|chapter=The Historical Context of Ordoliberalism's Theoretical Development|editor1=Thomas Biebricher|editor2=Werner Bonefeld|editor3=Peter Nedergaard|title=The Oxford Handbook of Ordoliberalism|year=2022|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-260543-6|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WWiLEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA50|page=50}} Otto Graf Lambsdorff, who served as Federal Minister of Economics, is a historical FDP grandee who was a proponent of ordoliberalism.{{cite book|author=Aurélie Dianara Andry|title=Social Europe, the Road Not Taken: The Left and European Integration in the Long 1970s|year=2022|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-286709-4|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0iyWEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA223|page=223}} In 1971 during its federal social-liberal coalition with the SPD, the FDP published the Freiburger Thesis programme, heralding an ideological move towards reformism and social liberalism,{{cite book|author=Peter H. Merkl|title=The Federal Republic of Germany at Forty: Union Without Unity|year=1989|isbn=978-0-81-475446-7|publisher=NYU Press|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hO88DAAAQBAJ&pg=PA335|page=335}} and support for environmental protection.{{cite book|author=Frank Uekotter|title=The Greenest Nation?: A New History of German Environmentalism|year=2017|isbn= 978-0-26-253469-7|publisher=MIT Press|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cjoiEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA90|page=90}} However, the party's 1977 Kiel Theses and 1985 Liberal Manifesto returned the FDP towards its traditional free-market, ordoliberal approach.{{cite book|author=Frank Titpon|title=A History of Modern Germany Since 1815|year=2003|isbn= 978-0-82-644910-8|publisher=A&C Black|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SQGMYLJRdXoC&pg=PA656|page=656}} Historical members of the party's social-liberal wing included Gerhart Baum and Werner Maihofer,{{cite book|author= Abraham L. Newman|title=Protectors of Privacy: Regulating Personal Data in the Global Economy|year=2008|publisher=Cornell University Press|isbn=978-0-8014-4549-1|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=N6NhDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA51|page=51}} a faction who remained organised as the Freiberg Circle.{{cite book|author=Christian Søe|chapter=A False Dawn for Germany’s Liberals: The Rise and Fall of Project 18|editor1=David P. Conradt|editor2=Gerald R. Kleinfeld|editor3=Christian Søe|title=Precarious Victory: The 2002 German Federal Election and Its Aftermath|publisher=Berghahn|year=2005|isbn=978-1-571-81864-5|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Zfig1l8FYPYC&pg=PA117|page=117}} Alternatively to the liberal-orientated wings of the party are a conservative or national-conservative wing, influenced by the populist and nationalist developments of the Freedom Party of Austria and the New Right.{{cite book|author= Gerard Braunthal|title=Right-Wing Extremism in Contemporary Germany|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|year=2009|isbn=978-0-23025-116-8|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1iOHDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA158|page=158}}{{cite book|author=David Art|title=The Politics of the Nazi Past in Germany and Austria|publisher= Cambridge University Press|year=2006|isbn= 978-1-139-44883-3|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=q3oLu8I8hVMC&pg=PA171|page=171}} The FDP's national-conservative wing has included individuals such as Rainer Zitelmann, Klaus Rainer Röhl, Alexander von Stahl, and Jürgen Möllemann, and was organised as the Liberal Offensive.{{cite book|author=Christian Søe|chapter=Neoliberal Stirrings: The “New” FDP and Some Old Habits|editor1=David P. Conradt|editor2=Gerald R. Kleinfeld|editor3=Christian Søe|title=Power Shift in Germany: The 1998 Election and the End of the Kohl Era|publisher=Berghahn|year=2000|isbn= 978-1-571-81200-1|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iugE7mVrDd0C&pg=PA68|page=68}} Möllemann in the particular was noted for his role during the 2002 federal election in attempting to push the party in a right-wing populist direction, albeit to poor electoral results.{{cite book|author1=Lars Rensmann|author2=Julius H. Rensmann|chapter=Politics and Resentment: Examining antisemitism and counter-cosmopolitanism in the European Union and beyond|editor1=Lars Rensmann|editor2=Julius H. Schoeps|title=Politics and Resentment: Antisemitism and Counter-Cosmopolitanism in the European Union|publisher=BRILL|year=2011|isbn=978-9-004-19046-7|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Vtnfw3YMNjcC&pg=PA59|page=59}}{{cite book|author=David F. Patton|chapter=Dogs That Did Not Bark: German Exceptionalism Reconsidered|editor1=David P. Conradt|editor2=Gerald R. Kleinfeld|editor3=Christian Søe|title=Precarious Victory: The 2002 German Federal Election and Its Aftermath|publisher=Berghahn|year=2005|isbn=978-1-571-81864-5|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Zfig1l8FYPYC&pg=PA181|page=181}}

During the 2017 federal election, the party called for Germany to adopt an immigration channel using a Canada-style points-based immigration system; spend up to 3% of GDP on defense and international security; phase out the solidarity surcharge tax (which was first levied in 1991 to pay for the costs of absorbing East Germany after German reunification); cut taxes by 30 billion euro (twice the amount of the tax cut proposed by the CDU); and improve road infrastructure by spending 2 billion euro annually for each of the next two decades, to be funded by selling government stakes in Deutsche Bahn, Deutsche Telekom, and Deutsche Post.Joel Lewin, [https://www.ft.com/content/6d9e1814-8108-11e7-a4ce-15b2513cb3ff How the policies of Germany's political parties match up], Financial Times (28 August 2017). The FDP also called for the improvement of Germany's digital infrastructure, the establishment of a Ministry of Digital Affairs, and greater investment in education.

The party supports replacement migration in response to the decline and aging of Germany's population. In 2020, Christian Dürr said that Germany should accept 500,000 immigrants per year.{{cite news |title='Germany needs 500,000 new immigrants every year' |url=https://www.thelocal.de/20200107/germany-needs-500000-new-immigrants-every-year |work=The Local |date=7 January 2020}} The party also supports allowing dual citizenship (in contrast to the CDU/CSU, which opposes it) but also supports requiring third-generation immigrants to select a single nationality.

The FDP supports the legalization of cannabis in Germany,[https://www.dw.com/en/germany-delays-roll-out-of-medical-marijuana/a-46872556 Germany delays roll-out of medical marijuana], Deutsche Welle (27 December 2018).Kathleen Schuster, [https://www.dw.com/cda/en/5-facts-about-cannabis-laws-in-germany/a-42709969 5 facts about cannabis laws in Germany], Deutsche Welle (10 March 2018). and opposes proposals to heighten Internet surveillance. The FDP supports same-sex marriage in Germany.Louise K. Davidson-Schmich, "Amending Germany's Life Partnership Law: Emerging Attention to Lesbians' Concerns" in Gender, Intersections, and Institutions: Intersectional Groups Building Alliances and Gaining Voice in Germany (ed. Louise K. Davidson-Schmich: University of Michigan Press, 2017), p. 216.{{Cite journal|last=Davidson-Schmich|first=Louise K.|date=2 October 2017|title=LGBT Politics in Germany: Unification as a Catalyst for Change|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2017.1370705|journal=German Politics|volume=26|issue=4|pages=534–55|doi=10.1080/09644008.2017.1370705|s2cid=158602084|issn=0964-4008}} The FDP supports legalisation of altruistic surrogacy.{{Cite web |last=Cook |first=Michael |date=18 August 2019 |title=Push in Germany for legalisation of surrogacy |url=https://bioedge.org/beginning-of-life-issues/surrogacy/push-in-germany-for-legalisation-of-surrogacy/ |access-date=29 August 2023 |website=BioEdge |language=en-US}}{{Cite web |title=FDP expert seeks legalizing surrogacy – BioTexCom – Center for Human Reproduction |url=https://biotexcom.com/fdp-expert-seeks-legalizing-surrogacy/ |access-date=29 August 2023 |language=en-US}} The FDP has mixed views on European integration.Eve Hepburn, Using Europe: Territorial Party Strategies in a Multi-level System (Manchester University Press, 2013).Sebastian U. Bukow, "It's (not only) the Economy, Stupid?: Past and Future of the German Liberal Party" in Liberal Parties in Europe (eds. Emilie van Haute & Caroline Close: Routledge, 2019), p. 157. In its 2009 campaign manifesto, the FDP pledged support for ratification of the Lisbon Treaty as well as EU reforms aimed at enhancing transparency and democratic responsiveness, reducing bureaucracy, establishing stringent curbs on the EU budget, and fully liberalizing the Single Market.Christian Schweiger, "Germany" in The 2009 Elections to the European Parliament (ed. Julia Lodge: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), p. 129. At its January 2019 congress ahead of the 2019 European Parliament election, FDP's manifesto called for further EU reforms, including reducing the number of European Commissioners to 18 from the current 28, abolishing the European Economic and Social Committee, and ending the European Parliament's "traveling circus" between Brussels and Strasbourg.Steffen Stierle, [https://www.euractiv.com/section/eu-elections-2019/news/german-liberal-fdp-agrees-european-election-programme/ Germany's liberals sign off on European election programme], EURACTIV (29 January 2019). Vice chairwoman and Deputy Leader Nicola Beer stated: "We want both more and less Europe."

File:European Parliament election 2024 votes FDP.svg]]

In 1940s and 1950s, the FDP was the only German party strongly in favour of market economy, while the CDU/CSU was still adhering to a "third way" between capitalism and socialism. Initially founded as a party uniting liberals and nationalists, the early FDP wanted former Nazis to be reintegrated into society and demanded a release of Nazi war criminals.{{Cite web |last=Leuschner |first=Udo |title=Schwarz-weiß-rot mit braunen Flecken – Die FDP muß erkennen, daß es rechts von der CDU/CSU nicht viel zu holen gibt |url=https://www.udo-leuschner.de/liberalismus/fdp2.htm |website=Die Geschichte der FDP}}

The party's membership has historically been largely male; in 1995, less than one-third of the party's members were women, and in the 1980s women made up less than one-tenth of the party's national executive committee. By the 1990s, the percentage of women on the FDP's national executive committee rose to 20%.Miki Caul Kittilson, Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe (Ohio State University Press, 2006), pp. 94–95.

The party tends to draw its support from professionals and self-employed Germans.Joseph A. Biesinger, Germany: A Reference Guide from the Renaissance to the Present (Facts on File: 2006), p. 296.[https://www.dw.com/en/germanys-political-parties-cdu-csu-spd-afd-fdp-left-party-greens-what-you-need-to-know/a-38085900 Germany's political parties CDU, CSU, SPD, AfD, FDP, Left party, Greens – what you need to know], Deutsche Welle, 25 March 2019. It lacks consistent support from a voting bloc, such as the trade union membership that supports the SPD or the church membership that supports the CDU/CSU, and thus has historically only garnered a small group of Stammwähler (core voters) who consistently vote for the party.Stuart Parkes, Understanding Contemporary Germany (Routledge, 1997), p. 62.Christian Søe, "Neoliberal Stirrings: The 'New' FDP and Some Old Habits" in Power Shift in Germany: The 1998 Election and the End of the Kohl Era (ed. George K. Romoser), p. 59.

In the 2021 elections, the FDP was the second-most popular party among voters under age 30; among this demographic, the Greens won 22% of the vote, the FDP 19%, the SPD 17%, the CDU/CSU 11%, Die Linke 8%, and the AfD 8%.Benjamin Wehrmann, [https://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/green-party-fdp-most-popular-parties-among-young-voters-german-election Green Party, FDP most popular parties among young voters in German election], Clean Energy Wire (28 September 2021).[https://www.forschungsgruppe.de/Aktuelles/Wahlanalyse_Bundestagswahl/Newsl_Bund210927.pdf Politbarometer, September 26, 2021] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211028120543/https://www.forschungsgruppe.de/Aktuelles/Wahlanalyse_Bundestagswahl/Newsl_Bund210927.pdf |date=28 October 2021 }}, Forschungsgruppe Wahlen, E.V. According to Deutsche Welle in 2021, voters for both the FDP and the Greens are similar in being younger, politically centrist professionals living in cities, unlike left working-class voters and right Christian voters.{{cite news|url=https://www.dw.com/en/germanys-kingmaker-the-fdp-has-returned-to-government/a-57559569 |title=FDP: The return of the kingmaker |quote=The FDP's natural voters are the same as the Green party's — younger, politically centrist professionals living in cities, unmoored both from the traditional working-class voter base of the SPD and the traditional Christian voter base of the CDU. |work=Deutsche Welle |date=27 September 2021 |access-date=27 January 2023}}

In the European Parliament the Free Democratic Party sits in the Renew Europe group with five MEPs.{{Cite web|title=Home {{!}} Nicola BEER {{!}} MEPs {{!}} European Parliament|url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197437/NICOLA_BEER/home|access-date=8 March 2021|website=europarl.europa.eu|date=23 January 1970 |language=en}}{{Cite web|title=Home {{!}} Andreas GLÜCK {{!}} MEPs {{!}} European Parliament|url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197443/ANDREAS_GLUCK/home|access-date=8 March 2021|website=europarl.europa.eu|date=8 March 1975 |language=en}}{{Cite web|title=Home {{!}} Svenja HAHN {{!}} MEPs {{!}} European Parliament|url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197444/SVENJA_HAHN/home|access-date=8 March 2021|website=europarl.europa.eu|date=25 July 1989 |language=en}}{{Cite web|title=Home {{!}} Moritz KÖRNER {{!}} MEPs {{!}} European Parliament|url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197445/MORITZ_KORNER/home|access-date=8 March 2021|website=europarl.europa.eu|date=3 August 1990 |language=en}}{{Cite web|title=Home {{!}} Jan-Christoph OETJEN {{!}} MEPs {{!}} European Parliament|url=https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197432/JAN-CHRISTOPH_OETJEN/home|access-date=8 March 2021|website=europarl.europa.eu|date=21 February 1978 |language=en}}

In the European Committee of the Regions, the Free Democratic Party sits in the Renew Europe CoR group, with one full member for the 2020–2025 mandate.{{Cite web|title=Member Page CoR|url=https://memberspage.cor.europa.eu/#/?mandate=mem&language=en&country=DE&politicalgroup=2020112&v=1615201538112}}{{Cite web|title=CoR Members Page|url=https://memberspage.cor.europa.eu/#/?mandate=alt&language=en&country=DE&politicalgroup=2020112&v=1615201532479}}

Below are charts of the results that the FDP has secured in each election to the federal Bundestag. Timelines showing the number of seats and percentage of party list votes won are on the right.

ImageSize = width:610 height:150

PlotArea = width:560 height:125 left:35 bottom:20

AlignBars = justify

Colors =

id:FDP value:rgb(0.9999,0.926,0)

DateFormat = yyyy

Period = from:0 till:100

TimeAxis = orientation:vertical

ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:10 start:0

PlotData =

bar:Seats color:FDP width:24 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:S

bar:1949 color:FDP from:start till:52 text:52 align:center

bar:1953 color:FDP from:start till:48 text:48 align:center

bar:1957 color:FDP from:start till:41 text:41 align:center

bar:1961 color:FDP from:start till:67 text:67 align:center

bar:1965 color:FDP from:start till:49 text:49 align:center

bar:1969 color:FDP from:start till:30 text:30 align:center

bar:1972 color:FDP from:start till:41 text:41 align:center

bar:1976 color:FDP from:start till:39 text:39 align:center

bar:1980 color:FDP from:start till:53 text:53 align:center

bar:1983 color:FDP from:start till:34 text:34 align:center

bar:1987 color:FDP from:start till:46 text:46 align:center

bar:1990 color:FDP from:start till:79 text:79 align:center

bar:1994 color:FDP from:start till:47 text:47 align:center

bar:1998 color:FDP from:start till:43 text:43 align:center

bar:2002 color:FDP from:start till:47 text:47 align:center

bar:2005 color:FDP from:start till:61 text:61 align:center

bar:2009 color:FDP from:start till:93 text:93 align:center

bar:2013 color:FDP from:start till:0 text:0 align:center

bar:2017 color:FDP from:start till:80 text:80 align:center

bar:2021 color:FDP from:start till:91 text:91 align:center

bar:2025 color:FDP from:start till:0 text:0 align:center

ImageSize = width:610 height:150

PlotArea = width:560 height:125 left:35 bottom:20

AlignBars = justify

Colors =

id:FDP value:rgb(0.9999,0.926,0)

DateFormat = yyyy

Period = from:0 till:20

TimeAxis = orientation:vertical

ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:5 start:0

PlotData =

bar:Vote% color:FDP width:24 mark:(line,white) align:left fontsize:S

bar:1949 color:FDP from:start till:12 text:11.9 align:center

bar:1953 color:FDP from:start till:9 text:9.5 align:center

bar:1957 color:FDP from:start till:8 text:7.7 align:center

bar:1961 color:FDP from:start till:13 text:12.8 align:center

bar:1965 color:FDP from:start till:9 text:9.5 align:center

bar:1969 color:FDP from:start till:6 text:5.8 align:center

bar:1972 color:FDP from:start till:9 text:8.4 align:center

bar:1976 color:FDP from:start till:8 text:7.9 align:center

bar:1980 color:FDP from:start till:11 text:10.6 align:center

bar:1983 color:FDP from:start till:7 text:6.9 align:center

bar:1987 color:FDP from:start till:9 text:9.1 align:center

bar:1990 color:FDP from:start till:11 text:11.0 align:center

bar:1994 color:FDP from:start till:7 text:6.9 align:center

bar:1998 color:FDP from:start till:6 text:6.2 align:center

bar:2002 color:FDP from:start till:7 text:7.4 align:center

bar:2005 color:FDP from:start till:10 text:9.8 align:center

bar:2009 color:FDP from:start till:14 text:14.6 align:center

bar:2013 color:FDP from:start till:5 text:4.8 align:center

bar:2017 color:FDP from:start till:11 text:10.7 align:center

bar:2021 color:FDP from:start till:11 text:11.4 align:center

bar:2025 color:FDP from:start till:4 text:4.3 align:center

File:Guido Westerwelle & Michael Mronz.jpg (right) and his partner Michael Mronz in 2009]]

File:Lambsdorff, Alexander Graf-1912.jpg, Vice President of the European Parliament (2014–2019)]]

File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F052013-0020, Kiel, FDP-Bundesparteitag, Klumpp (cropped).jpg, interim Minister-President of the Saarland from 26 June 1979 to 5 July 1979]]

{{main|Leader of the Free Democratic Party (Germany)}}

File:Hans-Dietrich Genscher Dezember 2007 CJD Koenigswinter 2.jpg served almost continuously as Foreign Minister and Vice Chancellor from 1974 to 1992.]]

File:Wolle-bundestag.jpg]]

• Federal Association of Liberal Students Groups
• Franz Xaver Kappus
• Liberalism in Germany
• List of political parties in Germany
• Politics of Germany

{{reflist|group="Note"}}

{{notelist}}

{{reflist}}

• {{cite book|title=Liberal Parties in Western Europe|last1=Kirchner|first1=Emil|last2=Broughton|first2=David|editor1-last=Kirchner|editor1-first=Emil|year=1988|publisher=Cambridge University Press|location=Cambridge|isbn=978-0-521-32394-9|pages=62–93|chapter=The FDP in the Federal Republic of Germany}}
• {{cite book|title=Party Politics in the New Germany|last=Roberts|first=Geoffrey K.|year=1997|publisher=Continuum International Publishing Group|location=London|isbn=978-1-85567-311-3|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=baa_OhYsv6wC}}
• {{cite book|title=Political Parties and European Integration|last1=Aguilera de Prat|first1=Cesáreo R.|last2=Rosenstein|first2=Jed|year=2009|publisher=Peter Lang|location=New York|isbn=978-90-5201-535-4|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ctGllqdyg7oC}}

{{Commons category}}

• {{Official website}} {{in lang|de}}
• {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150816003026/http://www.fdp.de/files/1463/130805_Kurzwahlprogramm_Online_Englisch_RZ.pdf |date=16 August 2015 }} {{in lang|en}}

{{Free Democratic Party (Germany)}}

{{ELDR member parties}}

{{Parties of Germany}}

{{Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party}}

{{Renew Europe}}

{{Authority control}}

Category:Free Democratic Party (Germany)

Category:Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party member parties

Category:Centrist parties in Germany

Category:Centre-right parties in Europe

Category:Classical liberal parties

Category:Conservative liberal parties

Category:Liberal conservative parties in Germany

Category:Liberal International

Category:Liberal parties in Germany

Category:Neoliberal parties

Category:Political parties established in 1948

Category:Parties represented in the European Parliament

Category:1948 establishments in Germany