List of Nvidia graphics processing units#GeForce 300 series

! rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: bottom"|Launch

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Code name}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Fab (nm){{cite web |title=3D accelerator database |url=http://vintage3d.org/dbn.php |website=Vintage 3D |access-date=21 July 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181023222614/http://www.vintage3d.org/dbn.php |archive-date=23 October 2018 |url-status=live }}}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Transistors (million)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Die size (mm²)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Bus interface}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Core clock (MHz)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Memory clock (MHz)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Core config{{efn|name=geforce 256 1|Pixel pipelines: texture mapping units: render output units}}}}

! colspan="4" |Memory

! colspan="4" |Fillrate

! colspan="2" |Latest API support

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|TDP (Watts)}}

!{{Vertical header|Bandwidth (GB/s)}}

!{{Vertical header|Bus type}}

!{{Vertical header|Bus width (bit)}}

!{{Vertical header|MOperations/s}}

!{{Vertical header|MPixels/s}}

!{{Vertical header|MTexels/s}}

!{{Vertical header|MVertices/s}}

!{{Vertical header|Direct3D}}

!{{Vertical header|OpenGL}}

|{{Date table sorting|May 22, 1995}}

|NV1

|SGS
500 nm

|1{{Cite web|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv1.g596|title=NVIDIA NV1 GPU Specs {{pipe}} TechPowerUp GPU Database|date=25 August 2023 }}

|90

|PCI

|12
75

|50
60

|rowspan="3" |1:1:1

|1
2
4

|0.4
0.48

|FPM
EDO
VRAM

|64

|12

|12

|12

| rowspan="10" |0

|1.0

|n/a

|?

|{{Date table sorting|August 25, 1997}}

| rowspan="2" |NV3

|SGS 350 nm

| rowspan="2" |4{{Cite web|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv3.g227|title=NVIDIA NV3 GPU Specs {{pipe}} TechPowerUp GPU Database|date=25 August 2023 }}

| rowspan="2" |90

|AGP 1x,{{cite web |url=http://www.nvidia.com/object/RIVA_128_FAQ.html |title=RIVA 128/ZX/TNT FAQ |access-date=June 15, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180616103247/http://www.nvidia.com/object/RIVA_128_FAQ.html |archive-date=June 16, 2018 |url-status=live }} PCI

| rowspan="2" |100

| rowspan="2" |100

|4

| rowspan="2" |1.6

| rowspan="9" |SDR

| rowspan="3" |128

| rowspan="2" |100

| rowspan="2" |100

| rowspan="2" |100

|5.0

| rowspan="2" |1.0

|?

|{{Date table sorting|February 23, 1998}}

|SGS/TSMC 350 nm

| rowspan="2" |AGP 2x, PCI

|8

|

|?

|{{Date table sorting|June 15, 1998}}

|NV4

|TSMC 350 nm

|7{{Cite web|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv4.g226|title=NVIDIA NV4 GPU Specs {{pipe}} TechPowerUp GPU Database|date=25 August 2023 }}

|90

|90

|110

|rowspan="7" |2:2:2

|8
16

|1.76

|180

|180

|180

|6.0

| rowspan="7" |1.2

|?

|{{Date table sorting|March 22, 1999}}

| rowspan="3" |NV6

| rowspan="4" |TSMC 250 nm

| rowspan="3" |

| rowspan="3" |

|AGP 4x, PCI

|100

|125

|8
16

|1.0

|rowspan="3" |64

|200

|200

|200

|

|?

|{{Date table sorting|March 2000}}

|AGP 2x

|80

|100

|8
16

|0.8

|160

|160

|160

|

|?

|{{Date table sorting|October 1999}}

| rowspan="4" |AGP 4x, PCI

| rowspan="2" |125

| rowspan="2" |150

|8
16
32

|1.2

| rowspan="2" |250

| rowspan="2" |250

| rowspan="2" |250

|

|?

|{{Date table sorting|March 15, 1999}}

| rowspan="3" |NV5

| rowspan="3" |15{{Cite web|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv5b.g333|title=NVIDIA NV5 GPU Specs {{pipe}} TechPowerUp GPU Database|date=21 September 2023 }}

| rowspan="3" |90

|16
32

|2.4

| rowspan="3" |128

|

|?

|{{Date table sorting|October 12, 1999}}

|TSMC 220 nm

|143

|166

|16
32

|2.656

|286

|286

|286

|

|?

|{{Date table sorting|March 15, 1999}}

|TSMC 250 nm

|150

|183

|16
32

|2.928

|300

|300

|300

|

|?

! rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: bottom"|Launch

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Code name}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Transistors (million)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Die size (mm²)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Bus interface}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Core clock (MHz)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Memory clock (MHz)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Core config{{efn|name=geforce 256 1|Pixel pipelines: texture mapping units: render output units}}}}

! colspan="4" |Memory

! colspan="4" |Fillrate

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Performance (MFLOPS
FP32)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|TDP (Watts)}}

!{{Vertical header|Bandwidth (GB/s)}}

!{{Vertical header|Bus type}}

!{{Vertical header|Bus width (bit)}}

!{{Vertical header|MOperations/s}}

!{{Vertical header|MPixels/s}}

!{{Vertical header|MTexels/s}}

!{{Vertical header|MVertices/s}}

|{{Dts|1999|October|11|format=mdy|abbr=on}}

| rowspan="2" |NV10

| rowspan="2" |17

| rowspan="2" |139

| rowspan="2" |{{nowrap|AGP 4x}}, PCI

| rowspan="2" |120

|166

| rowspan="2" |4:4:4

| rowspan="2" |32
64

|2.656

|SDR

| rowspan="2" |128

| rowspan="2" |480

| rowspan="2" |480

| rowspan="2" |480

| rowspan="2" |0

| rowspan="2" |960

|13

|{{Dts|1999|December|13|format=mdy|abbr=on}}

|150

|4.800

|DDR

|12

! rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: bottom"|Launch

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Code name}}

! rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: bottom"|Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Transistors (million)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Die size (mm²)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Bus interface}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Core clock (MHz)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Memory clock (MHz)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Core config{{efn|name=geforce 2 1|Pixel pipelines: texture mapping units: render output units}}}}

! colspan="4" |Memory

! colspan="4" |Fillrate

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Performance (GFLOPS
FP32)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|TDP (Watts)}}

!{{Vertical header|Bandwidth (GB/s)}}

!{{Vertical header|Bus type}}

!{{Vertical header|Bus width (bit)}}

!{{Vertical header|MOperations/s}}

!{{Vertical header|MPixels/s}}

!{{Vertical header|MTexels/s}}

!{{Vertical header|MVertices/s}}

|June 4, 2001

| rowspan="4" |NV1A (IGP) / NV11 (MX)

| rowspan="6" |TSMC
180 nm

| rowspan="4" |20{{cite web|title=NVIDIA GeForce2 MX PCI Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce2-mx-pci.c791|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

| rowspan="4" |64

|FSB

| rowspan="3" |175

|133

| rowspan="4" |2:4:2

|Up to 32 system RAM

|2.128
4.256

|DDR

|64
128

| rowspan="3" |350

| rowspan="3" |350

| rowspan="3" |700

| rowspan="8" |0

|0.700

|3

|March 3, 2001

| rowspan="3" |{{nowrap|AGP 4x}}, PCI

| rowspan="2" |166

| rowspan="6" |32
64

|1.328

| rowspan="2" |SDR

|64

|

|1

|June 28, 2000

|2.656

|128

|

|4

|March 3, 2001

| rowspan="3" |200

|166,200 (SDR)
166 (DDR)

|1.328 3.200 2.656

|SDR
DDR

|64/128 (SDR)
64 (DDR)

|400

|400

|800

|0.800

|5

|April 26, 2000

| rowspan="4" |NV15

| rowspan="4" |25{{Cite web|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv15.g339|title=NVIDIA NV15 GPU Specs {{pipe}} TechPowerUp GPU Database|accessdate=15 April 2024}}

| rowspan="4" |88

| rowspan="4" |AGP 4x

|166

| rowspan="4" |4:8:4

|5.312

|rowspan="4" |DDR

|rowspan="4" |128

| rowspan="2" |800

| rowspan="2" |800

| rowspan="2" |1,600

|1.600

|6

|December 5, 2000

| rowspan="2" |200

| rowspan="2" |6.4

|

|?

|October 1, 2001

|TSMC
150 nm

|rowspan="2" |250

| rowspan="2" |1,000

| rowspan="2" |1,000

| rowspan="2" |2,000

|2.000

|?

|August 14, 2000

|TSMC
180 nm

|230

|64

|7.36

|

|?

! rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: bottom"|Launch

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Code name}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Transistors (million)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Die size (mm²)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Bus interface}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Core clock (MHz)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Memory clock (MHz)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Core config{{efn|name=geforce 3 1|Pixel shaders: vertex shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}}}

! colspan="4" |Memory

! colspan="4" |Fillrate

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Performance (GFLOPS
FP32)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|TDP (Watts)}}

!{{Vertical header|Bandwidth (GB/s)}}

!{{Vertical header|Bus type}}

!{{Vertical header|Bus width (bit)}}

!{{Vertical header|MOperations/s}}

!{{Vertical header|MPixels/s}}

!{{Vertical header|MTexels/s}}

!{{Vertical header|MVertices/s}}

|October 1, 2001

| rowspan="3" |NV20

| rowspan="3" |57

| rowspan="3" |128

| rowspan="3" |{{nowrap|AGP 4x}}, PCI

|175

|200

| rowspan="3" |4:1:8:4

|64
128

|6.4

|rowspan="3" |DDR

|rowspan="3" |128

|700

|700

|1400

|43.75

|8.750

|?

|February 27, 2001

|200

|230

|64

|7.36

|800

|800

|1600

|50

|10.00

|?

|October 1, 2001

|240

|250

|64
128

|8.0

|960

|960

|1920

|60

|12.00

|29

! rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: bottom"|Launch

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Code name}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Transistors (million)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Die size (mm²)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Bus interface}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Core clock (MHz)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Memory clock (MHz)}}

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Core config{{efn|name=geforce 4 1|Pixel shaders: vertex shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}}}

! colspan="4" |Memory

! colspan="4" |Fillrate

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|Performance
(GFLOPS FP32)}}

! colspan="2" |Supported API version

! rowspan="2" {{Vertical header|TDP (Watts)}}

!{{Vertical header|Bandwidth
(GB/s)}}

!{{Vertical header|Bus type}}

!{{Vertical header|Bus width (bit)}}

!{{Vertical header|MOperations/s}}

!{{Vertical header|MPixels/s}}

!{{Vertical header|MTexels/s}}

!{{Vertical header|MVertices/s}}

!{{Vertical header|Direct3D}}

!{{Vertical header|OpenGL}}

|October 1, 2002

|NV1F

|?

|?

|FSB

|rowspan="5" |250

|133
200

|rowspan="8" |2:0:4:2

|Up to 128 system RAM

|2.128
6.4

|DDR

|64
128

| rowspan="5" |500

| rowspan="5" |500

| rowspan="2" |1,000

| rowspan="5" |125

|1.000

| rowspan="8" |7.0

|rowspan="8"|1.2

|?

| February 6, 2002

| rowspan="2" |NV17

| rowspan="2" |29{{cite web|title=NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420 PCI Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce4-mx-420-pci.c778|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

| rowspan="2" |65

| rowspan="2" |AGP 4x
PCI

|166

| 64

| 2.656

| SDR
DDR

| 128 (SDR)
64 (DDR)

|

| 14

| 2002

|133
166[https://gpuz.techpowerup.com/23/07/11/w8r.png Archived copy] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230711072328/https://gpuz.techpowerup.com/23/07/11/w8r.png|date=2023-07-11}}

| rowspan="2" |64
128

|2.128 5.312

|rowspan="12" |DDR

|64 128

|500

1000

|

|13

| December 14, 2003

| rowspan="2" |NV18B

| rowspan="2" |29

| rowspan="2" |65

| AGP 8x
PCI

| rowspan="2" |166

| rowspan="2" |2.656

| rowspan="2" |64

| rowspan="2" |1000

|

| 14

| February 19, 2004

| PCIe x16

| 128

|

| 16

| February 6, 2002

| NV17

| 29

| 65

| AGP 4x
PCI

| rowspan="2" |275

| 200

|rowspan="5" |64
128

|6.4

|128

| rowspan="2" |550

| rowspan="2" |550

| rowspan="2" |1,100

| rowspan="2" |137.5

|1.100

|18

| September 25, 2002

| NV18

| 29{{cite web|title=NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440-8x Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce4-mx-440-8x.c2132|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

| 65

| AGP 8x
PCI

| 166
250

|2.656{{Cite web |title=mx4408x-64bit166-Mhz |url=https://ibb.co/7XLyNBm |access-date=2022-12-25 |website=ImgBB |language=en |archive-date=25 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221225235549/https://ibb.co/7XLyNBm |url-status=usurped }}
8.0

|64
128

|

|19

| February 6, 2002

| NV17

|29

|65

|AGP 4x
PCI

|300

|275

|8.8

|rowspan="7" |128

|600

|600

|1,200

|150

|1.200

|22

|April 16, 2002

|NV25

|63{{cite web|title=NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce4-ti-4200.c2133|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

|142

|AGP 4x

|rowspan="2" |250

|222 (128 MiB)
250 (64 MiB)

|rowspan="6" |4:2:8:4

|7.104 (128 MiB)
8.0 (64 MiB)

| rowspan="2" |1,000

| rowspan="2" |1,000

| rowspan="2" |2,000

| rowspan="2" |125

|15.00

| rowspan="6" |8.0a

|rowspan="6" |1.3

|33

| September 25, 2002

| NV28

| 63{{cite web |title=NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200-8X Specs |url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce4-ti-4200-8x.c182 |access-date=2022-11-20 |website=TechPowerUp |language=en}}

| 142

| AGP 8x

| 250

| 8.0

|

| 34

| February 6, 2002

| NV25

| 63

| 142

| AGP 4x

| rowspan="2" |275

| rowspan="2" |275

| rowspan="4" |128

| rowspan="2" |8.8

| rowspan="2" |1,100

| rowspan="2" |1,100

| rowspan="2" |2,200

| rowspan="2" |137.5

|16.50

| 37

| January 20, 2003

| NV28

| 63

| 101

| AGP 8x

|

| 38

| February 6, 2002

| NV25

| 63

| 142

| AGP 4x

| rowspan="2" |300

| rowspan="2" |325

| rowspan="2" |10.4

| rowspan="2" |1,200

| rowspan="2" |1,200

| rowspan="2" |2,400

| rowspan="2" |150

|18.00

| ?

| January 20, 2003

| NV28

| 63

| 101

| AGP 8x

|

| 43

! colspan="2" | Features

! Video Processing Engine (VPE)

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

! rowspan="2" |Launch

! rowspan="2" |Code name

! rowspan="2" |Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" |Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" |Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" |Bus interface

! rowspan="2" |Core clock (MHz)

! rowspan="2" |Memory clock (MHz)

! rowspan="2" |Core config{{efn|name=geforce fx 1|Pixel shaders: vertex shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! colspan="4" |Memory

! colspan="4" |Fillrate

! rowspan="2" |Performance (GFLOPS
FP32)

! rowspan="2" |TDP (Watts)

!Bandwidth (GB/s)

!Bus type

!Bus width (bit)

!MOperations/s

!MPixels/s

!MTexels/s

!MVertices/s

| rowspan="3" |March 2003

| rowspan="5" |NV34

| rowspan="6" |TSMC 150 nm

| rowspan="5" |45{{cite web|title=NVIDIA NV34 GPU Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv34.g21|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

| rowspan="5" |124

| rowspan="2" |AGP 8x

|200

|rowspan="2" |166

|rowspan="10" |4:2:4:4

|64
128

|2.6

| rowspan="14" |DDR

|64

|800

|800

|800

|100.0

|12.0

|?

| rowspan="2" |250

| rowspan="3" |64
128
256

|2.6
5.3

|64
128

| rowspan="2" |1,000

| rowspan="2" |1,000

| rowspan="2" |1,000

| rowspan="2" |125.0

|15.0

|?

|AGP 8x
PCI

|200

|3.2
6.4

|64
128

|

|21

|March 6, 2003

|AGP 8x

|325

|325

|10.4

|128

|1,300

|1,300

|1,300

|162.5

|19.5

|32

|March 17, 2004

|PCIe x16

|250

|166

|128
256

|2.6

|64

|1,000

|1,000

|1,000

|125.0

|15.0

|21

|March 2004

|NV34B

|45{{cite web|title=NVIDIA GeForce FX 5500 PCI Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-fx-5500-pci.c62|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

|91

|AGP 8x
AGP 4x
PCI

|270

|166
200

|64
128
256

|5.3
6.4

|128

|1,080

|1,080

|1,080

|135.0

|16.2

|?

|October 2003

| rowspan="4" |NV31

| rowspan="19" |TSMC 130 nm

| rowspan="4" |80{{cite web|title=NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 XT PCI Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-fx-5600-xt-pci.c63|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

| rowspan="4" |121

|AGP 8x

|235

|200

|64
128

|3.2
6.4

|64
128

|940

|940

|940

|117.5

|14.1

|?

|March 2003

|AGP 8x
PCI

|325

|275

|64
128
256{{cite web |url=http://www.nvidia.com/page/fx_5600.html |title=GeForce FX 5600 |website=Nvidia.com |access-date=2015-12-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150925190010/http://www.nvidia.com/page/fx_5600.html |archive-date=2015-09-25 |url-status=live }}

|8.8

|rowspan="3" |128

|1,300

|1,300

|1,300

|162.5

|19.5

|25

| rowspan="2" |March 6, 2003

| rowspan="3" |AGP 8x

|350

|350

|rowspan="2" |64
128

|11.2

|1,400

|1,400

|1,400

|175.0

|21.0

|27

|400

|400

|12.8

|1,600

|1,600

|1,600

|200.0

|24.0

|31

|September 2004

| rowspan="6" |NV36

| rowspan="6" |82{{cite web|title=NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 LE Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-fx-5700-le.c747|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

|rowspan="6"|133

|rowspan="2"|250

|rowspan="2"|200

|rowspan="6"|4:3:4:4

|rowspan="3" |128
256

|rowspan="2" |3.2
6.4

|rowspan="2" |64
128

| rowspan="2" |1000

| rowspan="2" |1000

| rowspan="2" |1000

| rowspan="2" |187.5

|17.5

|20

|March 2004

|AGP 8x
PCI

|

|21

|2003

|AGP 8x

| rowspan="2" |425

| rowspan="2" |250

| rowspan="2" |8.0

| rowspan="6"|128

| rowspan="2" |1,700

| rowspan="2" |1,700

| rowspan="2" |1,700

| rowspan="2" |318.7

|29.7

|20

|March 17, 2004

|PCIe x16

|128

|

|25

|October 23, 2003

| rowspan="8" |AGP 8x

| rowspan="2" |475

|453

| rowspan="2" |128
256

|14.4

|GDDR2

| rowspan="2" |1,900

| rowspan="2" |1,900

| rowspan="2" |1,900

| rowspan="2" |356.2

|33.2

|43

|March 15, 2004

|475

|15.2

|GDDR3

|

|38

| rowspan="2" |January 27, 2003

| rowspan="2" |NV30

| rowspan="2" |125{{cite web|title=NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800 Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-fx-5800.c703|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

| rowspan="2" |199

|400

|400

| rowspan="2" |4:2:8:4

|rowspan="5" |128

|12.8

|rowspan="2" |GDDR2

|1,600

|1,600

|3,200

|300.0

|24.0

|55

|500

|500

|16.0

|2,000

|2,000

|4,000

|375.0

|30.0

|66

|December 15, 2003

|rowspan="5" |NV35

|rowspan="5" |135{{cite web|title=NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-fx-5900.c77|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

|rowspan="5" |207

|325

|rowspan="2" |350

| rowspan="7" |4:3:8:4

|rowspan="2" |22.4

|rowspan="6" |DDR

|rowspan="7" |256

|1,300

|1,300

|2,600

|243.7

|22.7

|?

|December 15, 2003{{cite web |url=http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nvidia-and-activision-launch-call-of-duty-bundle-with-geforce-fx-5900-graphics-cards-73319297.html |title=NVIDIA and Activision Launch "Call of Duty" Bundle with GeForce FX 5900 Graphics Cards |access-date=2017-03-31 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170401055327/http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nvidia-and-activision-launch-call-of-duty-bundle-with-geforce-fx-5900-graphics-cards-73319297.html |archive-date=2017-04-01 |url-status=live }}

|390

| rowspan="2" |1,600

| rowspan="2" |1,600

| rowspan="2" |3,200

| rowspan="2" |300.0

|27.3

|48

|May 2003

| 400

|rowspan="2" |425

|rowspan="2"|27.2

|28.0

|55

|May 12, 2003

|450

|rowspan="2"|128
256

|1,800

|1,800

|3,600

|337.5

|31.5

|65

|March 17, 2004

|PCIe x16

|350

|275

|17.6

|1,400

|1,400

|2,800

|262.5

|24.5

|49

|October 23, 2003

| rowspan="2" |NV38

| rowspan="2" |135{{cite web|title=NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-fx-5950-ultra.c79|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

| rowspan="2" |207

|AGP 8x

| rowspan="2" |475

|475

| rowspan="2" |256

| 30.4

| rowspan="2" |1,900

| rowspan="2" |1,900

| rowspan="2" |3,800

| rowspan="2" |356.2

|33.2

|83

|February 17, 2004

|PCIe x16

|425

|27.2

|GDDR3

|

|83

! rowspan="2" |Launch

! rowspan="2" |Code name

! rowspan="2" |Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" |Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" |Die size (mm{{sup|2}})

! rowspan="2" |Bus interface

! rowspan="2" |Core clock (MHz)

! rowspan="2" |Memory clock (MHz)

! rowspan="2" |Core config{{efn|name=geforce fx 1|Pixel shaders: vertex shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! colspan="4" |Memory

! colspan="4" |Fillrate

! rowspan="2" |Performance (GFLOPS
FP32)

! rowspan="2" |TDP (Watts)

!Bandwidth (GB/s)

!Bus type

!Bus width (bit)

!MOperations/s

!MPixels/s

!MTexels/s

!MVertices/s

! rowspan="2" |Launch

! rowspan="2" |Code name

! rowspan="2" |Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" |Transistors (million)
Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" |Bus interface

! rowspan="2" |Core clock (MHz)

! rowspan="2" |Memory clock (MHz)

! rowspan="2" |Core config{{efn|name=geforce 6 1|Pixel shaders: vertex shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! colspan="4" |Memory

! colspan="4" |Fillrate

! rowspan="2" |Performance (GFLOPS)

! rowspan="2" |TDP (Watts)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! Bus type

! Bus width (bit)

!MOperations/s

!MPixels/s

!MTexels/s

!MVertices/s

| October 20, 2005

| MCP51

| rowspan="4" |TSMC 90 nm

|

| rowspan="4" |HyperTransport

| rowspan="3" |425

| 100–200 (DDR)
200–533 (DDR2)

| rowspan="5" |2:1:2:1

| rowspan="4" |Up to 256 system RAM

| 1.6–6.4 (DDR)
3.2–17.056 (DDR2)

| DDR
DDR2

| rowspan="4" |64
128

| rowspan="3" |850

| rowspan="3" |425

| rowspan="3" |850

| rowspan="3" |106.25

| ?

| ?

| rowspan="2" |June 2006

| MCP61

| rowspan="2" |

| 200
400{{citation needed|date=September 2012}}

| 3.2
16.0{{citation needed|date=September 2012}}

| DDR2

| ?

| ?

| MCP61

| rowspan="2" |100–200 (DDR)
200–533 (DDR2)

| 1.6–6.4 (DDR)
3.2–17.056 (DDR2)

| rowspan="2" |DDR
DDR2

| ?

| ?

| October 20, 2005

| MCP51

|

| 475

| 1.6–6.4 (DDR)
3.2–17.056 (DDR2)

|950

|475

|950

|118.75

| ?

| ?

| April 4, 2005

| NV44

| rowspan="8" |TSMC 110 nm

| 75
110{{cite web|title=NVIDIA NV44 GPU Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv44.g161|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

| AGP 8x
PCIe x16

| 350

| 266

| 128
256

| 4.256

| DDR

| 64

|700

|700

|700

|87.5

| ?

| ?

| April 4, 2005

| NV44A

| 75
110{{cite web|title=NVIDIA NV44B GPU Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv44b.g427|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

| AGP 8x

PCI

| 300

350

| 250 (DDR)
250-333 (DDR2){{Cite web|url=http://www.xfxforce.com/en-us/products/graphiccards/6series/6200.aspx#2|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080916224908/http://www.xfxforce.com/en-us/products/graphiccards/6series/6200.aspx#2|url-status=dead|title=GeForce 6 Series-6200 - XFXforce.com|archivedate=September 16, 2008}}

| 4:3:4:2

| 128
256
512

| 4
4-5.34 (DDR2){{Cite web|url=http://xfxforce.com/web/product/listFeatures.jspa?series=GeForce%26%238482;+6200&seriesId=43|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012114632/http://xfxforce.com/web/product/listSpecifications.jspa?series=GeForce%26%238482;+6200&seriesId=43|url-status=dead|title=Products GeForce 6200:Features - XFXforce.com|archivedate=October 12, 2007}}

| DDR
DDR2{{Cite web |title=GeForce 6200:Model PV-T44A-WANG - XFXforce.com |url=http://www.xfxforce.com/web/product/listConfigurationDetails.jspa?series=GeForce%26%238482%3B+6200&productConfigurationId=79772 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080412013852/http://www.xfxforce.com/web/product/listConfigurationDetails.jspa?series=GeForce%26%238482%3B+6200&productConfigurationId=79772 |archivedate=April 12, 2008}}

| 64

|1,400

|700

|1400

|175
225

| ?

| ?

| October 12, 2004 (PCIe)
January 17, 2005 (AGP)

| NV43

| 146
154{{cite web|title=NVIDIA NV43 GPU Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv43.g7|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

| AGP 8x
PCI
PCIe x16

| 300

| 275

| 4:3:4:4

| 128
256

| 8.8

| DDR

| 128

|1,200

|1,200

|1,200

|225

| 1.2

| 20

| December 15, 2004

| rowspan="2" |NV44

| rowspan="2" |75
110

| rowspan="2" |PCIe x16

| 350

| 200
275
350

| rowspan="2" |4:3:4:2

| 128–256 System RAM incl.16/32–64/128 onboard

| 3.2
4.4
5.6

| rowspan="3" |DDR

| rowspan="2" |64

|1,400

|700

|1,400

|262.5

| 1.4

| 25

| October 1, 2005

| 400

| 333

| rowspan="4" |128
256

| 5.328

|1,600

|800

|1,600

|300

| ?

| ?

| 2005

| rowspan="3" |NV43

| rowspan="3" |146
154

| rowspan="6" |AGP 8x
PCIe x16

| rowspan="2" |300

| 200

| 4:3:4:4

| 6.4

| rowspan="3" |128

|1,200

| rowspan="2" |1,200

|1,200

| rowspan="2" |225

| 1.3

| ?

| August 12, 2004

| 275
400

| rowspan="2" |8:3:8:4

| 8.8
12.8

| DDR
DDR2

|2,400

|2,400

| 2.4

| 26

| August 12, 2004 (PCIe)
November 14, 2004 (AGP)

| 500

| 475 (AGP)
500 (PCIe)

| 15.2 (AGP){{cite web |url=http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/115/geforce-6600-gt-agp.html |title=Nvidia GeForce 6600 GT AGP |website=Techpowerup.com |access-date=2015-04-16 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20150416180159/http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/115/geforce-6600-gt-agp.html |archive-date=2015-04-16 |url-status=live }}
16 (PCIe)

| GDDR3

|4,000

|2,000

|4,000

|375

| 4.0

| 47

| July 22, 2004 (AGP)
January 16, 2005 (PCIe)

| rowspan="3" |NV40 (AGP)
NV41, NV42 (PCIe)

| rowspan="4" |IBM 130 nm

| rowspan="3" |222
287 (NV40){{cite web|title=NVIDIA NV40 GPU Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv40.g6|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}
222
225 (NV41){{cite web|title=NVIDIA NV41 GPU Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv41.g162|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}
198
222 (NV42){{cite web|title=NVIDIA NV42 GPU Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv42.g44|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

| 320 (AGP)
325 (PCIe)

| 350

| rowspan="2" |8:4:8:8

| 128

| 22.4

| DDR

| 256

|2,560 (AGP)
2,600 (PCIe)

|2,560 (AGP)
2,600 (PCIe)

|2,560 (AGP)
2,600 (PCIe)

|320 (AGP)
325 (PCIe)

| 2.6

| ?

| September 30, 2005

| 300 (64 Bit)
325

| 266 (64 Bit)
350
500 (GDDR3)

| 256

| 4.256
11.2
22.4
32 (GDDR3)

| DDR
DDR2
GDDR3

| 64{{cite web|url=https://www.biostar.com.tw/app/cn/vga/content.php?S_ID=40|title=映泰集团 :: V6802XA16 :: 产品规格|website=www.biostar.com.tw|access-date=2019-12-12|archive-date=12 October 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221012210343/https://www.biostar.com.tw/app/cn/vga/content.php?S_ID=40|url-status=live}}
128{{cite web|url=https://www.biostar.com.tw/app/en/vga/introduction.php?S_ID=37|title=VGA/GPU Manufacturer - BIOSTAR Group.|website=www.biostar.com.tw|language=en|access-date=2019-12-12|archive-date=12 October 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221012210234/https://www.biostar.com.tw/app/en/vga/introduction.php?S_ID=37|url-status=live}}
256

|2,400
2,600

|2,400
2,600

|2,400
2,600

|300
325

| 2.6

| 36

| April 14, 2004 (AGP)
November 8, 2004 (PCIe)

| 325

| 350

| rowspan="3" |12:5:12:12

| 128
256

| 22.4

| DDR

| rowspan="6" |256

|3,900

|3,900

|3,900

|406.25

| 3.9

| 40

| April 14, 2004

| NV45

| 222
287 (NV45){{cite web|title=NVIDIA NV45 GPU Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv45.g163|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

| PCIe x16

|

| 450

| 256

| 28.8

| rowspan="5" |GDDR3

|4,200

|4,200

|4,200

|437.5

| ?

| ?

| December 8, 2005 (AGP)
November 7, 2005 (PCIe)

| NV40 (AGP)
NV42 (PCIe)

| TSMC 110 nm

| 222
287 (NV40)
198
222 (NV42)

| AGP 8x
PCIe x16

| 350 (AGP)
425 (PCIe)

| rowspan="2" |500

| rowspan="2" |128
256

| rowspan="2" |32

|5,100

|5,100

|5,100

|531.25

| 4.2
5.1

| 59

| May 4, 2004 (AGP)
June 28, 2004 (PCIe)

| rowspan="2" |NV40 (AGP)
NV45 (PCIe)

| rowspan="3" |IBM 130 nm

| rowspan="2" |222
287 (NV40)
222
287 (NV45)

| rowspan="2" |AGP 8x
PCIe x16

| 350

| rowspan="3" |16:6:16:16

|5,600

|5,600

|5,600

|525

| 5.6

| 67

| May 4, 2004 (AGP)
June 28, 2004 (PCIe)
March 14, 2005 (512 MiB)

| 400

| 525 (512 MiB)
550 (256 MiB)

| 256
512

| 33.6 (512 MiB)
35.2 (256 MiB)

|6,400

|6,400

|6,400

|600

| 6.4

| 105

| May 4, 2004

| NV40

| 222
287 (NV40)

| AGP 8x

| 450

| 600

| 256

| 35.2

|7,200

|7,200

|7,200

|675

| ?

| ?

! rowspan="2" |Launch

! rowspan="2" |Code name

! rowspan="2" |Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" |Transistors (million)
Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" |Bus interface

! rowspan="2" |Core clock (MHz)

! rowspan="2" |Memory clock (MHz)

! rowspan="2" |Core config{{efn|name=geforce 6 1|Pixel shaders: vertex shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! colspan="4" |Memory

! colspan="4" |Fillrate

! rowspan="2" |Performance (GFLOPS)

! rowspan="2" |TDP (Watts)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! Bus type

! Bus width (bit)

!MOperations/s

!MPixels/s

!MTexels/s

!MVertices/s

! colspan="4" | Features

! Scalable Link Interface (SLI)

! TurboCache

! PureVideo WMV9 Decoding

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{Partial|Limited}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{Partial|Driver-Side Only}}

| {{Partial|Limited}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{Partial|Driver-Side Only}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (PCIe only)

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (No SLI Connector)

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (SLI Connector or PCIe Interface)

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (SLI Connector or PCIe Interface)

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (PCIe only)

| {{no}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (NV42 only)

| {{yes}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (PCIe only)

| {{no}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (NV41, NV42 only)

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (PCIe only)

| {{no}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (NV42 only)

| {{yes}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (PCIe only)

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (PCIe only)

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

! rowspan="2" |Launch

! rowspan="2" |Code name

! rowspan="2" |Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" |Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" |Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" |Bus interface

! rowspan="2" |Core clock (MHz)

! rowspan="2" |Memory clock (MHz)

! rowspan="2" |Core config{{efn|name=geforce 7 1|Pixel shaders: vertex shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! colspan="4" |Memory

! colspan="4" |Fillrate

! rowspan="2" |Performance (GFLOPS)

! rowspan="2" |TDP (Watts)

!Bandwidth (GB/s)

!Bus type

!Bus width (bit)

!MOperations/s

!MPixels/s

!MTexels/s

!MVertices/s

| rowspan="5" |July 2007

|MCP68S

| rowspan="2" |TSMC 110 nm

|

|

| rowspan="2" |HyperTransport

| rowspan="2" |425

| rowspan="2" |200 (DDR)
400 (DDR2)
933 (DDR3)

| rowspan="5" |2:1:2:2

| rowspan="5" |Up to 256 system RAM

| rowspan="2" |6.4
12.8
34

| rowspan="2" |DDR
DDR2
DDR3

| rowspan="2" |64
128

| rowspan="2" |850

| rowspan="2" |850

| rowspan="2" |850

| rowspan="2" |106.25

| ?

| ?

|MCP67QV

|

|

| ?

| ?

|MCP73

| rowspan="3" |TSMC 90 nm

|

|

|HyperTransport/FSB

|500

|333

|5.336

| rowspan="3" |DDR2

| rowspan="3" |64

|1,000

|1,000

|1,000

|125

| ?

| ?

| rowspan="2" |MCP76

|

|

| rowspan="2" |FSB

|600

| rowspan="2" |400

| rowspan="2" |6.4

|1,200

|1,200

|1,200

|150

| ?

| ?

|

|

|630

|1,260

|1,260

|1,260

|157.5

| ?

| ?

|August 8, 2006

|NV44

|TSMC 110 nm

|75

|110

| rowspan="5" |PCIe x16

|350

|266
333

|4:3:4:2

| rowspan="2" |128
256

|2.4
4.8

|DDR2

| rowspan="4" |32
64

|1,400

|700

|1,400

|262.5

| ?

| ?

|January 18, 2006

| rowspan="4" |G72

| rowspan="8" |TSMC 90 nm

| rowspan="4" |112{{cite web|title=NVIDIA G72 GPU Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-g72.g46|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

| rowspan="4" |81

|450

|400

|2:2:4:2

|3.2
6.4

| rowspan="4" |DDR2

| rowspan="3" |1,800

| rowspan="3" |900

| rowspan="3" |1,800

| rowspan="3" |337.5

|0.9

|11

| rowspan="2" |March 22, 2006

| rowspan="2" |350

| rowspan="2" |333

| rowspan="3" |4:3:4:2

| rowspan="2" |128

| rowspan="2" |2.656
5.328

| ?

| ?

|1.4

|13

|January 18, 2006

|550

|400

| rowspan="2" |128
256

|6.4

|64

|2,200

|1,100

|2,200

|412.5

|2.2

|10

|May 15, 2006

|G73

|177{{cite web|title=NVIDIA G73 GPU Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-g73.g48|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

|125

|AGP 8x
PCIe x16

|350

|325 (DDR2)
700 (GDDR3)

|8:5:8:4

|10.4
22.4

|DDR2
GDDR3

|128

|2,800

|1,400

|2,800

|437.5

|2.8

|24

|2006

|G72

|112

|81

|PCIe x16

|475
550

|405
324

|4:3:4:2

|64
128
256

|6.480
5.2

|DDR2

|64

|2,200

|1,100

|2,200

|593.8

| ?

|10

|March 22, 2006 (PCIe)
July 1, 2006 (AGP)

| rowspan="2" |G73

| rowspan="4" |177

| rowspan="4" |125

| rowspan="3" |AGP 8x
PCIe x16

|400

| rowspan="3" |400 (DDR2)
700 (GDDR3)

| rowspan="4" |12:5:12:8

| rowspan="6" |256

| rowspan="3" |12.8
22.4

| rowspan="3" |DDR2
GDDR3

| rowspan="4" |128

|4,800

|3,200

|4,800

|500

|4.8

|30

|March 9, 2006 (PCIe)
July 15, 2006 (AGP)

| rowspan="2" |560

| rowspan="2" |6,720

| rowspan="2" |4,480

| rowspan="2" |6,720

| rowspan="2" |700

|6.7

| ?

|January 8, 2007

|G73-B1

| rowspan="2" |TSMC 80 nm

| ?

|48

|March 22, 2006

|G73

|PCIe x16

|450

|400

|12.7

|DDR2

|5,400

|3,600

|5,400

|562.5

| ?

| ?

|February 2, 2006

| rowspan="3" |G70

| rowspan="3" |TSMC 110 nm

| rowspan="3" |302{{cite web|title=NVIDIA G70 GPU Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-g70.g40|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

| rowspan="3" |333

|AGP 8x

|375

|600

|16:8:16:8

|38.4

| rowspan="10" |GDDR3

| rowspan="10" |256

|6,000

|3,000

|6,000

|750

|6

|70

|August 11, 2005

| rowspan="2" |PCIe x16

|400

|500

|20:7:20:16

|32

|8,000

|6,400

|8,000

|700

|8

|59

|June 22, 2005 (256 MiB)
November 14, 2005 (512 MiB)

|430 (256 MiB)
550 (512 MiB)

|600 (256 MiB)
850 (512 MiB)

|24:8:24:16

|256
512

|38.4 (256 MiB)
54.4 (512 MiB)

|10,320 (256 MiB)
13,200 (512 MiB)

|6,880 (256 MiB)
8800 (512 MiB)

|10,320 (256 MiB)
13,200 (512 MiB)

|860 (256 MiB)
1,100 (512 MiB)

|10.3
13.2

|100 (256 MiB)
116 (512 MiB)

|May 2006 (PCIe)
April 2, 2007 (AGP)

| rowspan="4" |G71

| rowspan="7" |TSMC 90 nm

| rowspan="7" |278{{cite web|title=NVIDIA G71 GPU Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-g71.g47|access-date=2021-02-16|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

| rowspan="7" |196

|AGP 8x
PCIe x16

| rowspan="2" |450

| rowspan="3" |660

|20:7:20:16

| rowspan="2" |256

| rowspan="3" |42.24

|9,000

| rowspan="2" |7,200

|9,000

|787.5

|9

|50

|March 9, 2006

| rowspan="4" |PCIe x16

| rowspan="3" |24:8:24:16

|10,800

|10,800

|900

|10.8

|65

|October 1, 2006

| rowspan="2" |650

| rowspan="2" |512

| rowspan="2" |15,600

| rowspan="2" |10,400

| rowspan="2" |15,600

| rowspan="2" |1,300

|15.6

| ?

| rowspan="2" |March 9, 2006

|800

|51.2

|15.6

|105

|2x G71

|500

|600

|2x 24:8:24:16

|2x 512

|2x 38.4

|24,000

|16,000

|24,000

|2,000

| ?

| ?

|September 6, 2006 (PCIe)
April 2, 2007 (AGP)

|G71

|AGP 8x
PCIe x16

|550

|700

|24:8:24:16

|512

|44.8

|13,200

|8,800

|13,200

|1,100

|13.2

|90

|June 5, 2006

|2x G71

|PCIe x16

|500

|600

|2x 24:8:24:16

|2x 512

|2x 38.4

|24,000

|16,000

|24,000

|2000

|24

|136

! rowspan="2" |Launch

! rowspan="2" |Code name

! rowspan="2" |Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" |Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" |Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" |Bus interface

! rowspan="2" |Core clock (MHz)

! rowspan="2" |Memory clock (MHz)

! rowspan="2" |Core config{{efn|name=geforce 7 1|Pixel shaders: vertex shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

!Size (MiB)

!Bandwidth (GB/s)

!Bus type

!Bus width (bit)

!MOperations/s

!MPixels/s

!MTexels/s

!MVertices/s

! rowspan="2" |Performance (GFLOPS)

! rowspan="2" |TDP (Watts)

! colspan="4" |Fillrate

! colspan="5" | Features

! 64-bit OpenEXR HDR

! Scalable Link Interface (SLI)

! TurboCache

! Dual Link DVI

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (PCIe only, No SLI bridge)

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (PCIe only)

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (PCIe only, No SLI bridge)

| {{no}}

| {{yes|One port}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (PCIe only)

| {{no}}

| {{yes|One port}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (PCIe only)

| {{no}}

| {{yes|One port}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|One port}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (Depending on OEM Design)

| {{no}}

| {{yes|One port}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|One port}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|One port}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|One port}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|One port}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (PCIe only)

| {{no}}

| {{yes|Two ports}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|Two ports}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|Two ports}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|Two ports}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|Two ports}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes2}} Yes (PCIe only)

| {{no}}

| {{yes|Two ports}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|Two ports}}

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" |Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" | Bus interface

! colspan="3" | Clock rate

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=geforce 8 1|Unified shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! colspan="2" | Fillrate

! colspan="4" | Memory

!Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=geforce 8 3|To calculate the processing power, see Performance.}}

! colspan="4" | Supported API version

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts)

! rowspan="2" | Comments

! Shader (MHz)

! Memory (MHz)

! Pixel (GP/s)

! Texture (GT/s)

! Size (MiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! Bus type

! Bus width (bit)

!Single precision

! Direct3D

! OpenGL

!OpenCL

!CUDA

| rowspan="3" | 2008

| rowspan="3" | MCP78

| rowspan="5" |TSMC 80 nm

| {{unk}}

| {{unk}}

| rowspan="3" | PCIe 2.0 x16

| rowspan="3" | 500

| rowspan="2" | 1200

| rowspan="3" | 400
(system memory)

| rowspan="4" | 8:8:4

| rowspan="3" | 2

| rowspan="3" | 4

| Up to 512 from system memory

| rowspan="3" | 6.4
12.8

| rowspan="6" | DDR2

| rowspan="3" | 64
128

| rowspan="2" |28.8

| rowspan="6" | 10.0

| rowspan="18" | 3.3

| rowspan="3" |n/a

| rowspan="3" |n/a

| {{unk}}

| The block of decoding of HD-video PureVideo HD is disconnected

| July 2007

| rowspan="2" | G86

| rowspan="3" | 210

| rowspan="2" | 127

| PCIe 1.0 x16

| rowspan="2" | 450

| rowspan="2" | 900

| rowspan="3" | 400

| rowspan="2" | 1.8

| rowspan="2" | 3.6

| 128
512

| rowspan="3" | 6.4

| rowspan="3" | 64

| 14.4

| rowspan="15" |1.1

| rowspan="3" |1.1

| rowspan="2" | 40

| OEM only

| June 15, 2007

| PCIe 1.0 x16
PCI

| 16:8:4

| rowspan="2" | 128
256
512

| 28.8

| rowspan="4" |

| December 10, 2007

| G98

| TSMC 65 nm

| 86

| PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe x1
PCI

| 567

| 1400

| 8:8:4

| 2.268

| 4.536

| 22.4

| rowspan="2" | 25

| July 12, 2010

| GT218

| TSMC 40 nm

| 260

| 57

| PCIe 2.0 x16

| 520
589

| 1230

| 400 (DDR2)
600 (DDR3)

| 8:4:4

| 2.08
2.356

| 2.08
2.356

| 512
1024

| 4.8
6.4
9.6

| DDR2
DDR3

| 32
64

|19.7

| 10.1

|1.2

| April 17, 2007

| G86

| rowspan="4" | TSMC 80 nm

| 210

| 127

| PCIe 1.0 x16
PCI

| 450

| 900

| rowspan="2" | 400

| 16:8:4

| 1.8

| 3.6

| 256
512
1024

| rowspan="2" | 12.8

| rowspan="2" | DDR2

| rowspan="4" | 128

|28.8

| rowspan="11" | 10.0

| rowspan="5" |1.1

| 45

| April 2007

| rowspan="3" | G84

| rowspan="3" | 289

| rowspan="3" | 169

| PCIe 1.0 x16

| rowspan="2" | 540

| 1180

| 16:8:8

| rowspan="2" | 4.32

| 4.32

| 256
512

|75.5

| rowspan="2" | 47

| OEM only

| rowspan="2" | April 17, 2007

| PCIe 1.0 x16
PCI

| 1188

| 400
700

| rowspan="2" | 32:16:8

| 8.64

| 256
512
1024

| 12.8
22.4

| DDR2
GDDR3

|76

| rowspan="4" |

| PCIe 1.0 x16

| 675

| 1450

| 1000

| 5.4

| 10.8

| 256
512

| 32

| rowspan="8" | GDDR3

|92.8

| 71

| January 2008

| G92

| TSMC 65 nm

| 754

| 324

| PCIe 2.0 x16

| 550

| 1375

| rowspan="3" | 800

| 96:48:12

| 6.6

| 26.4

| 384
768

| 38.4

| 192

|264

| 105

| February 12, 2007 (320)
November 8, 2006 (640)

| rowspan="2" | G80

| rowspan="2" | TSMC 90 nm

| rowspan="2" | 681

| rowspan="2" | 484

| rowspan="2" | PCIe 1.0 x16

| 513

| 1188

| 96:24:20

| 10.3

| 12.3

| 320
640

| rowspan="2" | 64

| rowspan="2" | 320

|228

| rowspan="2" |1.0

| 146

| November 19, 2007

| 500

| 1200

| 112:28:{{efn|name=geforce 8 2|Full G80 contains 32 texture address units and 64 texture filtering units unlike G92 which contains 64 texture address units and 64 texture filtering units{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/2549/3 |title=Lots More Compute, a Leetle More Texturing - Nvidia's 1.4 Billion Transistor GPU: GT200 Arrives as the GeForce GTX 280 & 260 |website=Anandtech.com |access-date=2015-12-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222075904/http://www.anandtech.com/show/2549/3 |archive-date=2015-12-22 |url-status=live }}{{cite news |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/2116/6 |title=Digging deeper into the shader core - Nvidia's GeForce 8800 (G80): GPUs Re-architected for Direct3D 10 |website=Anandtech.com |access-date=2015-12-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222104756/http://www.anandtech.com/show/2116/6 |archive-date=2015-12-22 |url-status=live }}}}20

| 10

| 14

| 640

|268.8

| 150

| only XFX, EVGA and BFG models, very short-lived{{cite web |author=Volker Rißka |url=https://www.computerbase.de/2007-11/zwei-neue-geforce-8800-gts-bis-dezember/ |title=Zwei neue GeForce 8800 GTS bis Dezember |website=Computerbase.de |date=2007-11-03 |access-date=2015-12-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110718001216/http://www.computerbase.de/news/hardware/grafikkarten/nvidia/2007/november/zwei-neue-geforce-8800-gts-bis-dezember/ |archive-date=2011-07-18 |url-status=live }}

| October 29, 2007 (512)
December 11, 2007 (256, 1024)

| rowspan="2" | G92

| rowspan="2" | TSMC 65 nm

| rowspan="2" | 754

| rowspan="2" | 324

| rowspan="2" | PCIe 2.0 x16

| 600

| 1500

| 700 (256)
900 (512, 1024)

| 112:56:16

| 9.6

| 33.6

| 256
512
1024

| 57.6

| rowspan="2" | 256

|336

| rowspan="2" |1.1

| 125

| rowspan="4" |

| December 11, 2007

| 650

| 1625

| 970

| 128:64:16

| 10.4

| 41.6

| 512

| 62.1

|416

| 135

| November 8, 2006

| rowspan="2" | G80

| rowspan="2" | TSMC 90 nm

| rowspan="2" | 681

| rowspan="2" | 484

| rowspan="2" | PCIe 1.0 x16

| 575

| 1350

| 900

| rowspan="2" | 128:32:{{efn|name=geforce 8 2}}24

| 13.8

| 18.4

| rowspan="2" | 768

| 86.4

| rowspan="2" | 384

|345.6

| rowspan="2" |1.0

| 145

| May 2, 2007

| 612

| 1500

| 1080

| 14.7

| 19.6

| 103.7

|384

| 175

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" | Bus interface

! Core (MHz)

! Shader (MHz)

! Memory (MHz)

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=geforce 8 1|Unified shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! Pixel (GP/s)

! Texture (GT/s)

! Size (MiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! Bus type

! Bus width (bit)

!Single precision

! Direct3D

! OpenGL

!OpenCL

!CUDA

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts)

! rowspan="2" | Comments

! colspan="2" | Fillrate

! colspan="4" | Memory

!Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=geforce 8 3|To calculate the processing power, see Performance.}}

! colspan="4" | Supported API version

! colspan="7" | Features

! 3-Way
SLI

! PureVideo HD
with VP1

! PureVideo 2 with VP2,
BSP Engine, and AES128 Engine

! PureVideo 3 with VP3,
BSP Engine, and AES128 Engine

! PureVideo 4 with VP4

! Compute
ability

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|1.1}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|1.1}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes|1.2}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|1.1}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|1.1}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|1.1}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|1.1}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no|1.0}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no|1.0}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|1.1}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{yes|1.1}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no|1.0}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{yes}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no}}

| {{no|1.0}}

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" | Bus interface

! colspan="3" | Clock rate

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=geforce 9 1|Unified shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! colspan="4" | Memory

! colspan="2" |Fillrate

! Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=geforce 9 2|To calculate the processing power see Tesla (microarchitecture)#Performance.}}

! colspan="2" | Supported API version

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts)

! rowspan="2" | Comments

! Shader (MHz)

! Memory (MHz)

! Size (MiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! Bus type

! Bus width (bit)

!Pixel (GP/s)

!Texture (GT/s)

! Single precision

! Direct3D

! OpenGL

| rowspan="2" | October 2008

| MCP7A-S

| rowspan="2" | 65 nm

| rowspan="2" | 282

| rowspan="2" | 162

| rowspan="4" | PCIe 2.0 x16

| 450

| 1200

| rowspan="2" | 400
666

| rowspan="2" | 16:8:4

| rowspan="2" | Up to 512 from system memory

| rowspan="2" | 6.4/12.8
10.664/21.328

| rowspan="2" | DDR2
DDR3

| rowspan="2" | 64
128

|1.8

|3.6

| 57.6

| rowspan="17" | 10.0

| rowspan="17" | 3.3

| {{unk}}

| rowspan="2" | based on 8400 GS

| MCP7A-U

| 580

| 1400

|2.32

|4.64

| 67.2

| 12

| rowspan="2" | June 2008

| rowspan="2" | G98

| rowspan="2" |TSMC 65 nm

| rowspan="2" | 210

| rowspan="2" | 86

| 540

| 1300

| rowspan="2" | 500

| rowspan="2" | 8:8:4

| rowspan="2" | 256

| rowspan="2" | 6.4{{cite web |url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-9300-ge.c1760 |title=NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GE Specs {{pipe}} TechPowerUp GPU Database |publisher=Techpowerup.com |date=August 22, 2022 |accessdate=2022-08-22}}

| rowspan="2" | DDR2

| rowspan="2" | 64

|2.16

|4.32

| 20.8

| rowspan="2" | 25

|

| August 27, 2008

| G96-200-c1
G96a
G96b

| TSMC 55 nm

| rowspan="3" | 314

| rowspan="3" | 144

| rowspan="3" | PCIe 2.0 x16
PCI

| rowspan="3" | 550

| 400
800

| 16:8:4

| rowspan="3" | 256
512
1024

| 12.8
25.6

| DDR2
GDDR3

| rowspan="3" | 128

|2.2

|4.4

| 44.8

| rowspan="3" | 50

|

|

|

|

|500

|24:12:4

|16.0

|DDR2

|

|

|60

|OEM

| rowspan="2" | July 29, 2008

| G96-300-C1

| UMC 65 nm

| 500
800

| 32:16:8

| 16.0
25.6

| DDR2
GDDR3

|4.4

|8.8

| 89.6

|

| G94a

| rowspan="2" | TSMC 65 nm

| 505

| 240

| rowspan="10" |PCIe 2.0 x16

| 500

| 1250

| 500

| 48:24:12

| 768

| 24.0

| DDR2

| rowspan="2" | 192

|6

|12

| 120

| {{unk}}

| OEM

| May 2008

| G92-150-A2

| 754

| 324

| 550

| 1375

| 800

| 96:48:12

| 384
768
1536

| 38.4

| rowspan="9" | GDDR3

|6.6

|26.4

| 264

| 84

| rowspan="2" |

| October 2008

| G94a
G94b

| TSMC 65 nm
TSMC 55 nm

| rowspan="3" | 505

| 240
196?{{citation needed|date=September 2012}}

| 650

| 1625

| 900

| 48:24:16

| 512

| 57.6

| rowspan="7" | 256

|10.4

|15.6

| 156

| 90

| 2009

| G94b

| TSMC 55 nm

| 196?{{citation needed|date=September 2012}}

| 600
625

| 1500
1625

| 700/900
900{{citation needed|date=September 2012}}

| rowspan="2" | 64:32:16

| rowspan="4" | 512
1024

| 44.8/57.6
57.6{{citation needed|date=September 2012}}

|9.6
10.0

|19.2
20.0

| 192
208

| 59

| Core Voltage = 1.00v

| February 21, 2008

| G94-300-A1

| TSMC 65 nm

| 240

| 650

| 1625

| 900

| 57.6

|10.4

|20.8

| 208

| 95

|

| 2009

| G92a2
G92b

| TSMC/UMC 65 nm
TSMC/UMC 55 nm

| rowspan="4" | 754

| rowspan="2" | 324
260

| 550

| 1375

| 700
800
900

| rowspan="2" | 112:56:16

| 44.8
51.2
57.6

|8.8

|30.8

| 308

| 75

| Core Voltage = 1.00v

| July 2008

| G92a
G92b

| 65 nm
UMC 55 nm

| 600

| 1500

| 900

| 57.6

|9.6

|33.6

| 336

| 125
105

| rowspan="4" |

| April 1, 2008

| G92-420-A2

| TSMC 65 nm

| 324

| 675

| 1688

| 1100

| rowspan="2" | 128:64:16

| 512

| rowspan="2" | 70.4

|10.8

|43.2

| 432

| 140

| July 16, 2008

| G92b

| TSMC 55 nm

| 260

| 738

| 1836

| 1100

| 512
1024

|11.808

|47.232

| 470

| 141

| March 18, 2008

| 2x G92

| TSMC/UMC 65 nm

| 2x 754

| 2x 324

| 600

| 1500

| 1000

| 2x 128:64:16

| 2x 512

| 2x 64.0

| 2x 256

|2x 9.6

|2x 38.4

| 2x 384

| 197

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" | Bus interface

! Core (MHz)

! Shader (MHz)

! Memory (MHz)

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=geforce 9 1|Unified shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! Size (MiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! Bus type

! Bus width (bit)

!Pixel (GP/s)

!Texture (GT/s)

! Single precision

! Direct3D

! OpenGL

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts)

! rowspan="2" | Comments

! colspan="4" | Memory

! colspan="2" |Fillrate

! Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=geforce 9 2|To calculate the processing power see Tesla (microarchitecture)#Performance.}}

! colspan="2" | Supported API version

! colspan="3" | Features

! PureVideo 2 with VP2,
BSP Engine, and AES128 Engine

! PureVideo 3 with VP3,
BSP Engine, and AES128 Engine

| rowspan="7" {{yes}}

| rowspan="2" {{no}}

| rowspan="2" {{yes}}

| rowspan="8" {{yes}}

| rowspan="8" {{no}}

| rowspan="2" {{yes}}
3-way

| {{yes}}

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" | Bus interface

! colspan="3" | Clock rate

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=geforce 100 1|Unified shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! colspan="4" | Memory configuration

! colspan="2" |Fillrate

! Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=geforce 100 2|To calculate the processing power see Tesla (microarchitecture)#Performance.}}

! colspan="2" | Supported API version

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts)

! rowspan="2" | Comments

! Shader (MHz)

! Memory (MHz)

! Size (MiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! DRAM type

! Bus width (bit)

!Pixel (GP/s)

!Texture (GT/s)

! Single precision

! Direct3D

! OpenGL

| rowspan="5" | March 10, 2009

| G98

| TSMC 65 nm

| 210

| 86

| rowspan="5" | PCIe 2.0 x16

| 567

| rowspan="2" | 1400

| 500

| 8:8:4

| rowspan="2" | 512

| 8.0

| rowspan="3" | DDR2

| 64

|2.15

|4.3

| 22.4

| rowspan="5" | 10.0

| rowspan="5" | 3.3

| 35

| rowspan="5" | OEM products

| G96b

| rowspan="4" | TSMC 55 nm

| 314

| 121

| rowspan="2" | 500

| 800

| 32:16:8

| 16.0

| 128

|4.4

|8.8

| 89.6

| 50

| rowspan="2" | G94b

| rowspan="2" | 505

| rowspan="2" | 196

| 1250

| 500

| 48:24:12

| 1536

| 24.0

| 192

|6

|12

| 120

| 75

| 650

| 1625

| 1800

| 64:32:16

| 512 1024

| 57.6

| rowspan="2" | GDDR3

| rowspan="2" | 256

|10.4

|20.8

| 208

| 105

| G92b

| 754

| 260

| 738

| 1836

| 1000

| 128:64:16

| 1024

| 64.0

|11.808

|47.232

| 470

| 141

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" | Bus interface

! colspan="3" | Clock rate

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=geforce 200 1|Unified shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! colspan="4" | Memory configuration

! colspan="2" |Fillrate

! Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=geforce 200 2|To calculate the processing power see Tesla (microarchitecture)#Performance.}}

! colspan="2" | Supported API version

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts)

! rowspan="2" | Comments

! rowspan="2" | Release Price (USD)

! Shader (MHz)

! Memory (GT/s)

! Size (MiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! DRAM type

! Bus width (bit)

!Pixel (GP/s)

!Texture (GT/s)

! Single precision

! Direct3D

! OpenGL

| November 26, 2009

| GT218

| rowspan="2" | TSMC 40 nm

| rowspan="2" | 260

| rowspan="2" | 57

| PCIe 2.0 x16

| 589

| 1402

| 1

| 8:4:4

| 512

| 8

| DDR2

| 64

|2.356

|2.356

| 22.4

| rowspan="3" | 10.1

| rowspan="15" | 3.3

| 30.5

| OEM only

| rowspan="2" | October 12, 2009

| GT218-325-B1

| PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe x1
PCI

| 520
589

| 1230
1402

| 0.8
1–1.6

| 16:8:4

| 512
1024

| 4.0
8.0
12.8

| DDR2
DDR3

| 32
64

|2.356

|4.712

| 36.4
44.9

| 30.5

| rowspan="2" |

| GT216-300-A2

| TSMC 40 nm

| 486

| 100

| rowspan="13" | PCIe 2.0 x16

| 615(OEM)
625

| 1335(OEM)
1360

| 1
1.58

| 48:16:8

| 512
1024

| 16.0
25.3

| DDR2
DDR3

| 64
128

|5

|10

| 128.2(OEM)
130.6

| 58

| October 12, 2009{{cite web |url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/617/geforce-gt-230 |access-date=2018-08-06 |title=NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 Specs |archive-date=6 August 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180806210800/https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/617/geforce-gt-230 |url-status=live }}

| G94b

| rowspan="2" | TSMC/UMC 55 nm

| 505

| 196?

| 650

| 1625

| 1.8

| 48:24:16

| 512
1024

| 57.6

| GDDR3

| 256

|10.4

|15.6

| 156

| rowspan="2" | 10

| rowspan="2" | 75

| rowspan="2" | OEM only

| November 17, 2009

| GT215-450-A2

| TSMC 40 nm

| 727

| 139

| 550

| 1340

| 1.8
2
3.4(GDDR5)

| 96:32:8

| 512
1024

| 28.8(OEM)
32
54.4(GDDR5)

| DDR3
GDDR3
GDDR5

| 128

|4.4

|17.6

| 257.3

| 10.1

| 69

|

| July 1, 2009{{cite web |url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/242/geforce-gts-240-oem |title=NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM {{pipe}} techPowerUp GPU Database |access-date=2018-08-06 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20161212024149/https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/242/geforce-gts-240-oem |archive-date=2016-12-12 |url-status=live }}

| G92a
G92b

| TSMC 65 nm
TSMC/UMC 55 nm

| rowspan="3" | 754

| 324
260

| 675

| 1620

| 2.2

| 112:56:16

| 1024

| 70.4

| rowspan="9" | GDDR3

| rowspan="3" | 256

|10.8

|37.8

| 362.9

| rowspan="9" | 10.0

| 120

| OEM only

| 2009

| G92b

| TSMC/UMC 55 nm

| rowspan="2" | 260

| 702

| 1512

| 2

| rowspan="2" | 128:64:16

| 512
1024

| 64.0

|11.2

|44.9

| 387

| 130

|

| June 16, 2008

| GT200-100-A2

| 65 nm

| rowspan="5" | 1400

| 576

| 576

| 1242

| 1.998

| 192:64:28

| 896

| 111.9

| rowspan="3" | 448

|16.128

|36.864

| 477

| 182

| Replaced by GTX 260 Core 216

| $400 (dropped to $270 after 3 months{{cite web |url=https://www.techpowerup.com/review/zotac-geforce-gtx-260-amp2-edition/ |title=Zotac GeForce GTX 260 Amp² Edition 216 Shaders Review |date=16 September 2008 |access-date=2018-08-06 |archive-date=24 December 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191224053204/https://www.techpowerup.com/review/zotac-geforce-gtx-260-amp2-edition/ |url-status=live }})

| April 9, 2009

| GT200-105-B3

| TSMC/UMC 55 nm

| 470

| 633

| 1404

| 2.268

| 240:80:28

| 896 (1792)

| 127.0

|17.724

|50.6

| 674

| 219

| Effectively one-half of the GTX 295

| $250

| June 17, 2008

| GT200-300-A2

| 65 nm

| 576

| 602

| 1296

| 2.214

| rowspan="2" | 240:80:32

| 1024

| 141.7

| 512

|19.264

|48.16

| 622

| 236

| Replaced by GTX 285

| $650 (dropped to $430 after 3 months)

| January 15, 2009

| GT200-350-B3

| rowspan="2" | TSMC/UMC 55 nm

| 470

| 648

| 1476

| 2.484

| 1024 (2048)

| 159.0

| 512

|20.736

|51.84

| 708.48

| 204

| EVGA GTX285 Classified supports 4-way SLI

| $400

| January 8, 2009

| 2x GT200-400-B3

| 2x 1400

| 2x 470

| 576

| 1242

| 1.998

| 2x 240:80:28

| 2x 896

| 2x 111.9

| 2x 448

|2x 16.128

|2x 46.08

| 1192.3

| 289

| Dual PCB models were replaced with a single PCB model with 2 GPUs

| $500

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" | Bus interface

! Core (MHz)

! Shader (MHz)

! Memory (GT/s)

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=geforce 200 1|Unified shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! Size (MiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! DRAM type

! Bus width (bit)

!Pixel (GP/s)

!Texture (GT/s)

! Single precision

! Direct3D

! OpenGL

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts)

! rowspan="2" | Comments

! rowspan="2" | Release Price (USD)

! colspan="4" | Memory configuration

! colspan="2" |Fillrate

! Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=geforce 200 2|To calculate the processing power see Tesla (microarchitecture)#Performance.}}

! colspan="2" | Supported API version

! colspan="3" | Features

! PureVideo 2 with VP2
Engine: (BSP and 240 AES)

! PureVideo 4 with VP4 Engine

| colspan="1" rowspan="3" {{no}}

| colspan="1" rowspan="3" {{no}}

| colspan="3" rowspan="3" {{yes}}

| rowspan="7" {{yes}}
3-Way (4-way for EVGA 285 Classified)

| colspan="1" rowspan="8" {{yes}}

| colspan="1" rowspan="8" {{no}}

| {{yes}}

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" | Bus interface

! colspan="3" | Clock rate

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=geforce 300 1|Unified shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! colspan="4" | Memory configuration

! colspan="2" |Fillrate

! Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=geforce 300 2|To calculate the processing power see Tesla (microarchitecture)#Performance.}}

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts)

! rowspan="2" | Comments

! Shader (MHz)

! Memory (MHz)

! Size (MiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! DRAM type

! Bus width (bit)

!Pixel (GP/s)

!Texture (GT/s)

! Single precision

| November 27, 2009

| GT218

| rowspan="7" |TSMC 40 nm

| 260

| 57

| rowspan="7" | PCIe 2.0 x16

| 589

| 1402

| 1000

| 16:8:4

| 512

| 8

| DDR2

| rowspan="2" | 64

|2.356

|4.712

| 44.8

| 30.5

| OEM Card, similar to Geforce 210

| rowspan="6" | February 2010

| GT216

| 486

| 100

| 475

| 1100

| rowspan="2" | 1580

| 48:16:4

| 512

| 12.6

| DDR3

|3.8

|7.6

| 105.6

| 33

| OEM Card, similar to Geforce GT220

| GT215

| rowspan="5" | 727

| rowspan="5" | 144

| 540

| 1302

| 72:24:8

| 1024

| 25.3

| rowspan="3" | GDDR3

| 128

|4.32

|12.96

| 187.5

| 43

| OEM Card

| GT215-301-A3{{cite web|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gt-330-oem.c1758|title=NVIDIA GeForce GT 330 OEM Specs|website=TechPowerUp|language=en|access-date=2020-03-23}}

| 550

| 1350

|

| rowspan="2" | 96:32:8

| 512

| 32.00

| 128

|4.40

|17.60

| 257.3

| rowspan="3" | 75

| rowspan="3" | Specifications vary depending on OEM, similar to GT230 v2.

| GT215

| 550

| 1340

| 3400

| 96:32:8

| 512
1024

| 54.4

| GDDR5{{cite web |url=http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_geforce_gt_340_us.html |title=GeForce GT 340 OEM {{pipe}} GeForce |website=Nvidia.com |access-date=2015-12-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120228151256/http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_geforce_gt_340_us.html |archive-date=2012-02-28 |url-status=live }}

| 128

|

|

| 257.3

| 69

| OEM Card, similar to GT240

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! colspan="3" | Clock rate

! rowspan="2" | SM count

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=geforce 400 1|Unified shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}{{efn|name=geforce 400 3|Each SM in the GF100 contains 4 texture filtering units for every texture address unit. The complete GF100 die contains 64 texture address units and 256 texture filtering units.{{cite web |url=http://anandtech.com/show/2977/nvidia-s-geforce-gtx-480-and-gtx-470-6-months-late-was-it-worth-the-wait-/3 |title=The GF100 Recap - Nvidia's GeForce GTX 480 and GTX 470: 6 Months Late, Was It Worth the Wait? |website=Anandtech.com |access-date=2015-12-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110805164512/http://www.anandtech.com/show/2977/nvidia-s-geforce-gtx-480-and-gtx-470-6-months-late-was-it-worth-the-wait-/3 |archive-date=2011-08-05 |url-status=live }} Each SM in the GF104/106/108 architecture contains 8 texture filtering units for every texture address unit but has doubled both addressing and filtering units. The complete GF104 die also contains 64 texture address units and 512 texture filtering units despite the halved SM count, the complete GF106 die contains 32 texture address units and 256 texture filtering units and the complete GF108 die contains 16 texture address units and 128 texture filtering units.{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/3809/nvidias-geforce-gtx-460-the-200-king/2 |title=GF104: Nvidia Goes Superscalar - Nvidia's GeForce GTX 460: The $200 King |website=Anandtech.com |access-date=2015-12-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222100647/http://www.anandtech.com/show/3809/nvidias-geforce-gtx-460-the-200-king/2 |archive-date=2015-12-22 |url-status=live }}}}

! colspan="4" | Memory configuration

! colspan="2" |Fillrate

! colspan="2" | Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=geforce 400 2|To calculate the processing power see Fermi (microarchitecture)#Performance.}}

! colspan="5" |Supported API version

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts){{efn|name=geforce 400 4|Note that while GTX 460's TDP is comparable to that of AMD's HD5000 series, GF100-based cards (GTX 480/470/465) are rated much lower but pull significantly more power, e.g. GTX 480 with 250W TDP consumes More power than an HD 5970 with 297W TDP.{{cite web |url=http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-480,2585-15.html |title=GeForce GTX 480 And 470: From Fermi And GF100 To Actual Cards! |website=Tomshardware.com |date=27 March 2010 |access-date=2015-12-11 |archive-date=11 September 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130911085858/http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-480,2585-15.html |url-status=live }}}}

! rowspan="2" | Release Price (USD)

! Shader (MHz)

! Memory (MHz)

! Size (GiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! DRAM type

! Bus width (bit)

!Pixel (GP/s)

!Texture (GT/s)

! Single precision

! Double precision

!Vulkan

!Direct3D

!OpenGL

!OpenCL{{efn|name=geforce 400 6|The 400 series is the only non-OEM family from GeForce 9 to 700 series not to include an official dual-GPU system. However, on March 18, 2011, EVGA released the first single-PCB card with dual 460s on board. The card came with 2048 MiB of memory at 3600 MHz and 672 shader processors at 1400 MHz and was offered at the MSRP of $429.}}

!CUDA

| September 16, 2011

| GT216
GT218

| 40 nm

| 486
260

| 100
57

| 475
589

| 1100
1402

| 800
790

| rowspan="2" | 1

| 48:16:8
16:8:4

| 0.5
1

| 12.6

| DDR3

| 64

|3.8
2.36

|7.6
4.71

| 105.6
44.86

| {{unk}}

| rowspan="17" |n/a

|10.1

|3.3

| rowspan="2" |1.1

|1.2

| 30.5

| rowspan="3" | OEM

| September 3, 2010

| GF108

| rowspan="16" | TSMC 40 nm

| rowspan="5" | 585

| rowspan="5" | 116

| rowspan="4" | 700

| rowspan="4" | 1400

| 1800

| 48:4:4

| 0.5

| 28.8

| rowspan="4" | GDDR3

| rowspan="2" | 128

| rowspan="4" |2.8

|2.8

| 134.4

| {{unk}}

| rowspan="16" |12 FL 11_1

| rowspan="16" |4.6

| rowspan="13" |2.1

| 50

| rowspan="3" | October 11, 2010

| rowspan="3" | GF108
GF108-300-A1

| 1600
1800

| rowspan="4" | 2

| rowspan="4" | 96:16:4

| 0.5

| 25.6
28.8

| rowspan="3" |11.2

| 268.8

| {{unk}}

|1.2

| 60

| February 1, 2011

| GF108

| 810

| 1620

| 1800
3200

| 0.5
1

| 28.8
51.2

| GDDR3
GDDR5

| 128

|3.2

|12.9

| 311.04

| {{unk}}

| 65

| $100

| 790

| 1580

| 4000

| 1.5

| 96.0

| rowspan="10" | GDDR5

|4.7

|18.9

| 455.04

| {{unk}}

| 106

| November 15, 2010

| GF104-225-A1

| rowspan="5" | 1950

| rowspan="5" | 332

| rowspan="2" | 650

| rowspan="2" | 1300

| rowspan="2" | 3400

| 6

| 288:48:32

| 1

| 108.8

| rowspan="2" | 256

|7.8

|31.2

| 748.8

| {{unk}}

| 150

| $160

| October 11, 2010

| GF104

| rowspan="4" | 7

| 336:56:32

| 1

| 108.8

|9.1

|36.4

| 873.6

| {{unk}}

|

| OEM

| May 31, 2010

| GF100-030-A3

| rowspan="3" | 3000{{cite web |url= http://www.nvidia.com/content/PDF/fermi_white_papers/NVIDIA_Fermi_Compute_Architecture_Whitepaper.pdf |title= Nvidia Fermi Compute Architecture Whitepaper |access-date= 2010-04-17 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20091122092429/http://www.nvidia.com/content/PDF/fermi_white_papers/NVIDIA_Fermi_Compute_Architecture_Whitepaper.pdf |archive-date= 2009-11-22 |url-status= live }} {{small|( 855KB)}}, page 11 of 22

| rowspan="3" | 529

| rowspan="2" | 608

| rowspan="2" | 1215

| 3206

| 11

| 352:44:32

| 1

| 102.7

| 256

|13.3

|26.7

| 855.36

| 106.92

| rowspan="3" |1.2

| rowspan="3" |2.0

| 200{{efn|name=geforce 400 4}}

| $279

| March 26, 2010

| GF100-275-A3

| 3348

| 14

| 448:56:40

| 1.25

| 133.9

| 320

|17.0

|34.0

| 1088.64

| 136.08

| 215{{efn|name=geforce 400 4}}

| $349

| March 26, 2010

| GF100-375-A3

| 701

| 1401

| 3696

| 15

| 480:60:48

| 1.5

| 177.4

| 384

|21.0

|42.0

| 1344.96

| 168.12

| 250{{efn|name=geforce 400 4}}

| $499

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! colspan="3" | Clock rate

! rowspan="2" | SM count

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=geforce 400 1|Unified shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}{{efn|name=geforce 400 3}}

! colspan="4" | Memory configuration

! colspan="2" |Fillrate

! colspan="2" | Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=geforce 400 2|To calculate the processing power see Fermi (microarchitecture)#Performance.}}

! colspan="5" |Supported API version

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts){{efn|name=geforce 400 4}}

! rowspan="2" | Release Price (USD)

! Shader (MHz)

! Memory (MHz)

! Size (GiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! DRAM type

! Bus width (bit)

!Pixel (GP/s)

!Texture (GT/s)

! Single precision

! Double precision

!Vulkan

!Direct3D

!OpenGL

!OpenCL{{efn|name=geforce 400 6|The 400 series is the only non-OEM family from GeForce 9 to 700 series not to include an official dual-GPU system. However, on March 18, 2011, EVGA released the first single-PCB card with dual 460s on board. The card came with 2048 MiB of memory at 3600 MHz and 672 shader processors at 1400 MHz and was offered at the MSRP of $429.}}

!CUDA

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" | Bus interface

! colspan="3" | Clock rate

! rowspan="2" | SM count

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=geforce 500 1|Unified shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}{{efn|name=geforce 500 3|Each SM in the GF110 contains 4 texture filtering units for every texture address unit. The complete GF110 die contains 64 texture address units and 256 texture filtering units.{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/4008/nvidias-geforce-gtx-580/2 |title=GF110: Fermi Learns Some New Tricks - Nvidia's GeForce GTX 580: Fermi Refined |website=Anandtech.com |access-date=2015-12-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160113203734/http://www.anandtech.com/show/4008/nvidias-geforce-gtx-580/2 |archive-date=2016-01-13 |url-status=live }} Each SM in the GF114/116/118 architecture contains 8 texture filtering units for every texture address unit but has doubled both addressing and filtering units.}}

! colspan="4" | Memory configuration

! colspan="2" |Fillrate

! colspan="2" | Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=geforce 500 2|To calculate the processing power see Fermi (microarchitecture)#Performance.}}

! colspan="5" |Supported API version

! rowspan="2" | TDP (watts){{efn|name=geforce 500 6|Similar to previous generation, GTX 580 and most likely future GTX 570{{Update inline|date=April 2021}}, while reflecting its improvement over GF100, still have lower rated TDP and higher power consumption, e.g. GTX580 (243W TDP) is slightly less power hungry than GTX 480 (250W TDP). This is managed by clock throttling through drivers when a dedicated power hungry application is identified that could breach card TDP. Application name changing will disable throttling and enable full power consumption, which in some cases could be close to that of GTX480.{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/Show/Index/4008?cPage=14&all=False&sort=0&page=17&slug=nvidias-geforce-gtx-580 |title=Power, Temperature, and Noise - Nvidia's GeForce GTX 580: Fermi Refined |website=Anandtech.com |access-date=2015-12-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160113203734/http://www.anandtech.com/Show/Index/4008?cPage=14&all=False&sort=0&page=17&slug=nvidias-geforce-gtx-580 |archive-date=2016-01-13 |url-status=live }}}}

! rowspan="2" | Release Price (USD)

! Shader (MHz)

! Memory (MHz)

! Size (GiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! DRAM type

! Bus width (bit)

!Pixel (GP/s)

!Texture (GT/s)

! Single precision

! Double precision

!Vulkan

!Direct3D

!OpenGL

!OpenCL⁸

!CUDA

| September 29, 2011

| rowspan="2" | GF119

| rowspan="15" |TSMC 40 nm

| rowspan="2" | 292

| rowspan="2" | 79

| PCIe 2.0 x16

| 523

| 1046

| rowspan="4" | 1800

| rowspan="2" | 1

| rowspan="2" | 48:8:4

| rowspan="3" | 1
2

| 14.4

| rowspan="4" | DDR3

| rowspan="2" | 64

|2.1

|4.5

| 100.4

| {{unk}}

| rowspan="15" |n/a

| rowspan="15" |12 FL 11_1

| rowspan="15" |4.6

| rowspan="15" |1.1

| rowspan="12" |2.1

| 25

| OEM

| April 12, 2011

| PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x1
PCI

| 810

| 1620

| 14.4

|3.25

|6.5

| 155.5

| {{unk}}

| 29

| $59

| rowspan="3" | May 14, 2011

| GF108-220

| 585

| 116

| rowspan="13" | PCIe 2.0 x16

| 700

| 1400

| 2

| 96:16:4

| 28.8

| 128

|2.8

|11.2

| 268.8

| 22.40

| 50

| OEM

| rowspan="2" | GF116

| rowspan="3" | ~1170

| rowspan="3" | ~238

| 720

| 1440

| rowspan="2" | 3

| rowspan="2" | 144:24:16

| 1.5
3

| 43

| 192

|11.52

|17.28

| 415.07

| {{unk}}

| 70

| $149

| March 15, 2011

| GF116-400

| 900

| 1800

| 4104

| 4

| 192:32:24

| 0.75+0.25
1.5

| 65.7+32.8
98.5

| 128+64{{efn|name=geforce 500 9|1024 MiB RAM on 192-bit bus assemble with 4 x (128 MiB) + 2 x (256 MiB).}}
192

|21.6

|28.8

| 691.2

| {{unk}}

| 116

| $149

| May 14, 2011

| GF114

| rowspan="4" | 1950

| rowspan="4" | 332

| rowspan="2" | 736

| rowspan="2" | 1472

| rowspan="2" | 3828

| rowspan="2" | 6

| rowspan="2" | 288:48:24

| rowspan="2" | 1

| rowspan="2" | 91.9

| rowspan="2" | 128+64{{efn|name=geforce 500 9|1024 MiB RAM on 192-bit bus assemble with 4 x (128 MiB) + 2 x (256 MiB).}}

| rowspan="2" |17.6

| rowspan="2" |35.3

| rowspan="2" |847.9

| {{unk}}

| rowspan="3" |150

| rowspan="2" | OEM

| February 20, 2012{{Cite web |date=2023-08-18 |title=NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE Specs |url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-560-se.c341 |access-date=2023-08-18 |website=TechPowerUp |language=en}}

| GF114-200-KB-A1{{efn|name=geforce 500 4|Internally referred to as GF104B{{cite web |url=http://www.gpu-tech.org/content.php/144-%E2%80%A6and-GF110s-real-name-is-GF100B-%28and-who-guesses-what-GF114-is-%29 |title=...and GF110s real name is: GF100B |website=GPU-Tech.org |access-date=2015-12-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160113203736/http://www.gpu-tech.org/content.php/144-%E2%80%A6and-GF110s-real-name-is-GF100B-%28and-who-guesses-what-GF114-is-%29 |archive-date=2016-01-13 |url-status=live }}}}

| {{unk}}

|

| May 17, 2011

| GF114-325-A1{{efn|name=geforce 500 4}}

| 810

| 1620

| rowspan="2" | 4008

| 7

| 336:56:32

| rowspan="2" | 1 2

| 128.1

| rowspan="2" | 256

|25.92

|45.36

| 1088.6

| {{unk}}

| $199

| January 25, 2011

| GF114-400-A1{{efn|name=geforce 500 4}}

| 822

| 1645

| 8

| 384:64:32

| 128.26

|26.3

|52.61

| 1263.4

| 110

| 170

| $249

| November 29, 2011

| GF110-270-A1{{efn|name=geforce 500 5}}

| 14

| 448:56:40

| 1.25

| 40.99

| 1311.7

| 163.97

| $289

| December 7, 2010

| GF110-275-A1{{efn|name=geforce 500 5}}

| 15

| 480:60:40

| 1.25 2.5

|43.92

| 1405.4

| 175.68

| rowspan="3" |2.0

| 219{{efn|name=geforce 500 6}}

| $349

| November 9, 2010

| GF110-375-A1{{efn|name=geforce 500 5}}

| 772

| 1544

| 4008

| 16

| 512:64:48

| 1.5
3{{efn|name=geforce 500 7|Some companies have announced that they will be offering the GTX580 with 3GB RAM.{{cite web |url=http://www.evga.com/products/moreInfo.asp?pn=03G-P3-1584-AR&family=GeForce+500+Series+Family&sw |title=Products - Featured Products |publisher=EVGA |access-date=2015-12-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120324052045/http://www.evga.com/products/moreInfo.asp?pn=03G-P3-1584-AR&family=GeForce+500+Series+Family&sw |archive-date=2012-03-24 |url-status=live }}}}

| 192.384

| 384

|37.05

|49.41

| 1581.1

| 197.63

| 244{{efn|name=geforce 500 6}}{{cite web |url=http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_580/3.html |title=Nvidia GeForce GTX 580 1536 MB Review |website=TechPowerUp |date=2010-11-09 |access-date=2015-12-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222085437/http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_580/3.html |archive-date=2015-12-22 |url-status=live }}

| $499

| March 24, 2011

| 2x GF110-351-A1

| 2x 3000

| 2x 520

| 607

| 1215

| 3414

| 2x16

| 2x 512:64:48

| 2x 1.5

| 2x163.87

| 2x384

|2x29.14

|2x38.85

| 2488.3

| 311.04

| 365

| $699

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" | Bus interface

! colspan="3" | Clock rate

! rowspan="2" | SM count

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=geforce 500 1|Unified shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}{{efn|name=geforce 500 3}}

! colspan="4" | Memory configuration

! colspan="2" |Fillrate

! colspan="2" | Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=geforce 500 2|To calculate the processing power see Fermi (microarchitecture)#Performance.}}

! colspan="5" |Supported API version

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts){{efn|name=geforce 500 6}}

! rowspan="2" | Release Price (USD)

! Shader (MHz)

! Memory (MHz)

! Size (GiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! DRAM type

! Bus width (bit)

!Pixel (GP/s)

!Texture (GT/s)

! Single precision

! Double precision

!Vulkan

!Direct3D

!OpenGL

!OpenCL⁸

!CUDA

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" | Bus interface

! colspan="5" | Clock rate

! rowspan="2" | SM count

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=geforce 600 1|Unified shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! colspan="4" | Memory configuration

! colspan="2" |Fillrate

! colspan="2" | Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=geforce 600 10|To calculate the processing power see Kepler (microarchitecture)#Performance, or Fermi (microarchitecture)#Performance.}}

! colspan="4" | Supported API version

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts)

! rowspan="2" | Release Price (USD)

! Average Boost (MHz)

! Max Boost (MHz)

! Shader (MHz)

! Memory (MHz)

! Size (GiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! DRAM type

! Bus width (bit)

!Pixel (GP/s)

!Texture (GT/s)

! Single precision

! Double precision

! Vulkan{{efn|name=geforce 600 11|Vulkan 1.2 is only supported on Kepler cards.}}

! Direct3D

! OpenGL

! OpenCL

| April 3, 2012

| GF119

| rowspan="5" |TSMC 40 nm

| rowspan="3" | 292

| rowspan="3" | 79

| PCIe 2.0 x16

| 523

| {{N/a}}

| {{N/a}}

| 1046

| 898
(1796)

| rowspan="3" | 1

| 48:8:4

| 0.5 1

| 14.4

| rowspan="7" | DDR3

| rowspan="5" | 64

|2.09

|4.2

| 100.4

| {{unk}}

| rowspan="5" {{N/a}}

| rowspan="27" | 12

| rowspan="27" | 4.6

| rowspan="27" | 1.2

| 25

| OEM

| May 15, 2012

| GF119-300-A1

| PCIe 2.0 x16, PCIe x1, PCI

| rowspan="2" | 810

| {{N/a}}

| {{N/a}}

| rowspan="2" | 1620

| 1000
1800

| 48:8:4

| 0.5
1
2

| 8
14.4

| rowspan="2" |3.24

|6.5

| 155.5

| {{unk}}

| 29

| Retail

| April 3, 2012

| GF119

| rowspan="3" | PCIe 2.0 x16

|{{N/a}}

|{{N/a}}

| 898
(1796)

| 48:8:4

| 0.5
1

| 14.4

|6.5

| 155.5

| {{unk}}

| 30

| OEM

| February 19, 2013

| GF119

| 292

| 79

| 810

| {{N/a}}

| {{N/a}}

| 1620

| 898
(1796)

| rowspan="2" | 1

| 48:8:4

| 0.5 1

| 14.4

|3.24

|6.5

| 155.5

| {{unk}}

| 30

| rowspan="2" | OEM

| April 24, 2012

| GK107

| TSMC 28 nm

| 1300

| 118

| PCIe 3.0 x16

| 875

| {{N/a}}

| {{N/a}}

| 875

| 891
(1782)

| 192:16:16

| 1
2

| 28.5

| rowspan="3" | 128

|14

|14

| 336

| 14

| 1.2

| 50

| February 19, 2013

| GK208

| PCIe 3.0 x8

| 967

| {{N/a}}

| {{N/a}}

| 967

| 1001
(2002)

| 384:16:8

| 16

|7.74

|15.5

| 742.7

| {{unk}}

| 35

| rowspan="3" | OEM

| rowspan="2" | April 24, 2012

| GF116

| TSMC 40 nm

| 1170

| 238

| PCIe 2.0 x16

| 720

| {{N/a}}

| {{N/a}}

| 1440

| 891
(1782)

| 3

| 144:24:24

| 1.5
3

| 42.8

| 192

|17.3

|17.3

| 414.7

| {{unk}}

| {{N/a}}

| 75

| April 24, 2012

| GF114-400-A1

| TSMC 40 nm

| 1950

| 332

| PCIe 2.0 x16

| 776

| {{N/a}}

| {{N/a}}

| 1552

| 1914

| 6

| 288:48:24

| 91.9

| 192

|18.6

|37.3

| 894

| {{unk}}

| {{N/a}}

| 140

| rowspan="2" | OEM

| April 22, 2013

| GK106

| rowspan="11" | TSMC 28 nm

| 2540

| 221

| rowspan="11" | PCIe 3.0 x16

| 823.5

| 888.5

| {{N/a}}

| 823

| 1000
(4000)

| 3

| 576:48:16

| 64

| rowspan="4" | 128

|14.16

|39.5

| 948.1

| 39.53

| rowspan="11" | 1.2

| rowspan="2" | 64

| September 13, 2012

| GK107-450-A2

| 1300

| 118

| rowspan="2" | 1058

| {{N/a}}

| {{N/a}}

| rowspan="2" | 1058

| rowspan="2" | 1250
(5000)

| rowspan="2" | 2

| rowspan="2" | 384:32:16

| rowspan="4" | 1
2

| rowspan="2" | 80

| rowspan="2" |16.9

| rowspan="2" |33.8

| 812.54

| rowspan="2" | 33.86

| $110

| October 9, 2012

| GK106-220-A1

| 928

| {{N/a}}

| {{N/a}}

| 928

| 1350
(5400)

| rowspan="2" | 4

| 768:64:16

| 86.4

|14.8

|59.4

| 1425.41

| 59.39

| 110

| $150 (130)

| March 26, 2013

| GK106-240-A1

| rowspan="2" | 980

| rowspan="2" | 1032

| {{N/a}}

| rowspan="2" | 980

| 1502
(6008)

| 768:64:24

| 144.2

| 192

|23.5

|62.7

| 1505.28

| 62.72

| 134

| $170 (150)

| September 13, 2012

| GK106-400-A1

| 1084

| 1502
(6008)

| 5

| 960:80:24

| 1.5+0.5
3

| 96.1+48.1
144.2

| 128+64
192

|23.5

|78.4

| 1881.6

| 78.40

| 140

| $230 (180)

| August 16, 2012

| GK104-300-KD-A2

| rowspan="2" | 915

| rowspan="2" | 980

| 1058

| rowspan="2" | 915

| 1502
(6008)

| rowspan="2" | 7

| 1344:112:24

| 2

| 96.1+48.1
144.2

| 128+64
192

|22.0

|102.5

| 2459.52

| 102.48

| 150

| $300

| May 10, 2012

| GK104-325-A2

| 1084

| 1502
(6008)

| 1344:112:32

| rowspan="2" | 2
4

| 192.256

| rowspan="2" | 256

|29.3

|102.5

| 2459.52

| 102.48

| 170

| $400

| March 22, 2012

| GK104-400-A2

| 1006{{cite web |url= http://www.geforce.com/Active/en_US/en_US/pdf/GeForce-GTX-680-Whitepaper-FINAL.pdf |title= Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 Whitepaper.pdf |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20120417045615/http://www.geforce.com/Active/en_US/en_US/pdf/GeForce-GTX-680-Whitepaper-FINAL.pdf |archive-date= April 17, 2012 |df= mdy-all }} {{small|( 1405KB)}}, page 6 of 29

| 1058

| 1110

| 1006

| 1502
(6008)

| 8

| 1536:128:32

| 192.256

|32.2

|128.8

| 3090.43

| 128.77

| 195

| $500

| April 29, 2012

| 2x GK104-355-A2

| 2x 3540

| 2x 294

| 915

| 1019

| 1058

| 915

| 1502
(6008)

| 2x 8

| 2x 1536:128:32

| 2x 2

| 2x 192.256

| 2x 256

|2x 29.28

|2x 117.12

| 2x 2810.88

| 2x 117.12

| 300

| $1000

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" | Bus interface

! colspan="5" | Clock rate

! rowspan="2" | SM count

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=geforce 600 1|Unified shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! colspan="4" | Memory configuration

! colspan="2" |Fillrate

! colspan="2" | Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=geforce 600 10|To calculate the processing power see Kepler (microarchitecture)#Performance, or Fermi (microarchitecture)#Performance.}}

! colspan="4" | Supported API version

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts)

! rowspan="2" | Release Price (USD)

! Average Boost (MHz)

! Max Boost (MHz)

! Shader (MHz)

! Memory (MHz)

! Size (GiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! DRAM type

! Bus width (bit)

!Pixel (GP/s)

!Texture (GT/s)

! Single precision

! Double precision

! Vulkan{{efn|name=geforce 600 11}}

! Direct3D

! OpenGL

! OpenCL

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" | Bus interface

! colspan="4" | Clock rate

! rowspan="2" | SMX count

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=geforce 700 1|Unified shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! colspan="4" | Memory configuration

! colspan="2" |Fillrate

! colspan="2" |Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=geforce 700 9|To calculate the processing power see Maxwell (microarchitecture)#Performance, or Kepler (microarchitecture)#Performance.}}

! colspan="4" | Supported API version

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts)

! rowspan="2" | Release Price (USD)

! Average Boost (MHz)

! Max Boost{{efn|name=geforce 700 2|Max Boost depends on ASIC quality. For example, some GTX TITAN with over 80% ASIC quality can hit 1019 MHz by default, lower ASIC quality will be 1006 MHz or 993 MHz.}} (MHz)

! Memory (MHz)

! Size (GiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! DRAM type

! Bus width (bit)

!Pixel (GP/s)

!Texture (GT/s)

!Single precision

!Double precision

! Vulkan{{efn|name=geforce 700 11|Maxwell supports Vulkan version 1.3, while Kepler only support Vulkan version 1.2, Fermi does not support the Vulkan API at all.}}

! Direct3D{{efn|name=geforce 700 3|Kepler supports some optional 11.1 features on feature level 11_0 through the Direct3D 11.1 API, however Nvidia did not enable four non-gaming features to qualify Kepler for level 11_1.{{cite web |url=http://www.guru3d.com/news_story/nvidia_kepler_not_fully_compliant_with_directx_11_1.html |title=Nvidia Kepler not fully compliant with Direct3D 11.1 |website=Guru3d.com |access-date=2015-12-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222113454/http://www.guru3d.com/news_story/nvidia_kepler_not_fully_compliant_with_directx_11_1.html |archive-date=2015-12-22 |url-status=live }}{{Cite web|url=https://brightsideofnews.com/blog/nvidia-doesnt-fully-support-directx-111-with-kepler-gpus2c-bute280a6/|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130903174514/http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2012/11/21/nvidia-doesnt-fully-support-directx-111-with-kepler-gpus2c-bute280a6.aspx|url-status=dead|title=Nvidia Doesn't Fully Support DirectX 11.1 with Kepler GPUs, But...|date=November 21, 2012|archivedate=September 3, 2013}}}}

! OpenGL

! OpenCL

| rowspan="2" | March 27, 2014

| GF119-300-A1

| TSMC 40 nm

| 292

| 79

| PCIe 2.0 x16

| 810

| {{n/a}}

| {{n/a}}

| 898
(1796)

| rowspan="4" | 1

| 48:8:4

| 0.5
1

| rowspan="2" | 14.4

| rowspan="2" | DDR3

| 64

|3.24

|6.5

|155.5

|19.4

| n/a

| rowspan="21" | 12

| rowspan="20" | 4.6

| 1.1

| 29

| rowspan="2" | OEM

| GK208-301-A1

| rowspan="5" | TSMC 28 nm

| rowspan="5" | 1020

| rowspan="5" | 79

| PCIe 2.0 x8

| 823

| {{n/a}}

| {{n/a}}

| 900 (1800)

| 192:16:8

| 0.5

| rowspan="5" | 64

|6.6

|13.2

|316.0

|13.2

| 1.2

| rowspan="5" | 1.2

|

| March 27, 2014

| GK208-201-B1

| rowspan="3" | PCIe 2.0 x8

| 797

| {{n/a}}

| {{n/a}}

| 900 (1800)
1253 (5010)

| 192:16:8

| 1
2

| 14.4
40.0

|6.4

|12.8

|306

|12.8

|

| $49–59

| rowspan="3" | June 18, 2014

| GK208-301-A1

| 902

| {{n/a}}

| {{n/a}}

| 900
(1800)

| rowspan="5" | 2

| 384:16:8

| 1{{cite web|url=https://www.zotac.com/product/graphics_card/gt-730-1gb|title=GeForce GT 730 1GB-ZOTAC|work=ZOTAC|access-date=July 12, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160719212714/https://www.zotac.com/product/graphics_card/gt-730-1gb|archive-date=July 19, 2016|url-status=live}}
2
4

| 14.4

| DDR3

|7.22

|14.44

| rowspan="2" |692.7

| rowspan="2" |28.9

|

| 23

| rowspan="3" | $69–79

| rowspan="2" | May 29, 2014

| rowspan="2" | GK107-425-A2

| rowspan="14" | TSMC
28HP

| rowspan="2" | 1270

| rowspan="2" | 118

| rowspan="14" | PCIe 3.0 x16

| 993

| {{n/a}}

| {{n/a}}

| 891
(1782)

| 384:32:16

| 28.5

| rowspan="5" | 128

|15.9

|31.8

| rowspan="2" |762.6

| rowspan="2" |31.8

| 1.2

| rowspan="14" | 1.2

| rowspan="2" | 64

| rowspan="2" | $89–99

| rowspan="3" | February 18, 2014

| GM107-220-A2

| rowspan="3" | 1870

| rowspan="3" | 148

| 1033

| {{unk}}

| {{unk}}

| 900
(1800)

| 3

| 384:24:16

| 1
4

| 28.8

| DDR3

|16.5

|24.8

|793.3

|24.8

| rowspan="3" | 1.3

| rowspan="2" | 55

| OEM

| GM107-300-A2

| 1020

| 1085

| 1163

| 1250
(5000)

| 4

| 512:32:16

| 1
2
4{{cite web|title=AFOX GTX 750 4 GB Specs|url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/afox-gtx-750-4-gb.b9074|access-date=2021-08-11|website=TechPowerUp|language=en}}

| 80

| rowspan="11" | GDDR5

|16.3

|32.6

|1044.5

|32.6

| $119

| GM107-400-A2

| 1020

| 1085

| 1200

| 1350
(5400)

| 5

| 640:40:16

| 1
2
4

| 86.4

|16.3

|40.8

|1305.6

|40.8

| 60

| $149

| October 17, 2013

| GK104-200-KD-A2

| rowspan="4" | 3540

| rowspan="4" | 294

| 824

| 888

| 889

| 1450
(5800)

| rowspan="2" | 6

| 1152:96:24

| 1.5
3

| 139.2

| 192

|19.8

|79.1

|1896.2

|79.0

| rowspan="9" | 1.2

| 130

| OEM

| June 25, 2013

| GK104-225-A2

| 980

| 1033

| 1124

| 1502
(6008)

| 1152:96:32

| 2
4

| 192.3

| rowspan="3" | 256

|31.4{{efn|name=geforce 700 10|As a Kepler GPC is able to rasterize 8 pixels per clock, fully enabled GK110 GPUs (780 Ti/TITAN Black) can only output 40 pixels per clock (5 GPCs), despite 48 ROPs and all SMX units being physically present. For GTX 780 and GTX 760, multiple GPC configurations with differing pixel fillrate are possible, depending on which SMXs were disabled in the chip: 5/4 GPCs, or 4/3 GPCs, respectively.}}

|94

|2257.9

|94.1

| rowspan="2" | 170

| $249 ($219)

| September 27, 2013{{cite web |url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2491/geforce-gtx-760-ti-oem |title=NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Specs |access-date=2018-08-06 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20160530101755/http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/2491/geforce-gtx-760-ti-oem |archive-date=2016-05-30 |url-status=live }}

| GK104

| 915

| 980

| 1084

| 1502
(6008)

| 7

| 1344:112:32

| 2

| 192.3

|29.3

|102.5

|2459.5

|102.5

| OEM

| May 30, 2013

| GK104-425-A2

| 1046

| 1085

| 1130

| 1752.5
(7010)

| 8

| 1536:128:32

| 2 4

| 224

|33.5

|134

|3213.3

|133.9

| rowspan="5" | 230

| $399 ($329)

| May 23, 2013

| GK110-300-A1

| rowspan="4" | 7080

| rowspan="4" | 561

| 863

| 900

| 1002

| 1502
(6008)

| 12

| 2304:192:48

| 3 6{{cite web |url=http://www.evga.com/articles/00830/ |title=Articles - EVGA GeForce GTX 780 6GB Step-Up Available Now! |publisher=EVGA |date=2014-03-21 |access-date=2015-12-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160113203734/http://www.evga.com/articles/00830/ |archive-date=2016-01-13 |url-status=live }}

| 288.4

| rowspan="4" | 384

|41.4{{efn|name=geforce 700 10|As a Kepler GPC is able to rasterize 8 pixels per clock, fully enabled GK110 GPUs (780 Ti/TITAN Black) can only output 40 pixels per clock (5 GPCs), despite 48 ROPs and all SMX units being physically present. For GTX 780 and GTX 760, multiple GPC configurations with differing pixel fillrate are possible, depending on which SMXs were disabled in the chip: 5/4 GPCs, or 4/3 GPCs, respectively.}}

|160.5

|3976.7

|165.7

| $649 ($499)

| November 7, 2013

| GK110-425-B1

| 876

| 928

| 1019

| 1752.5
(7010)

| 15

| 2880:240:48

| 3

| 336.5

|42.0{{efn|name=geforce 700 10|As a Kepler GPC is able to rasterize 8 pixels per clock, fully enabled GK110 GPUs (780 Ti/TITAN Black) can only output 40 pixels per clock (5 GPCs), despite 48 ROPs and all SMX units being physically present. For GTX 780 and GTX 760, multiple GPC configurations with differing pixel fillrate are possible, depending on which SMXs were disabled in the chip: 5/4 GPCs, or 4/3 GPCs, respectively.}}

|210.2

|5045.7

|210.2

| $699

| February 21, 2013

| GK110-400-A1

| 837

| 876

| 993

| 1502
(6008)

| 14

| 2688:224:48

| rowspan="2" | 6

| 288.4

|40.2

|187.5

|4499.7

|1300{{cite web |title=Titan's Compute Performance (aka Ph.D Lust) - Nvidia's GeForce GTX Titan Review, Part 2: Titan's Performance Unveiled |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/6774/nvidias-geforce-gtx-titan-part-2-titans-performance-unveiled/3 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222141607/http://www.anandtech.com/show/6774/nvidias-geforce-gtx-titan-part-2-titans-performance-unveiled/3 |archive-date=2015-12-22 |access-date=2015-12-11 |website=Anandtech.com |quote=the calculated fp64 peak of Titan is 1.5 TFlops. However, under heavy load in fp64 mode, the card may underclock below the listed 837MHz to remain within the power and thermal specifications}}-1499.9

| rowspan="2" | $999

| February 18, 2014

| GK110-430-B1

| 889

| 980

| 1058

| 1752.5
(7010)

| 15

| 2880:240:48

| 336.5

|42.7

|213.4

|5120.6

|1706.9

| May 28, 2014

| 2x GK110-350-B1{{cite web|url=https://diy.pconline.com.cn/488/4883359_all.html|title=售价21999元！NV旗舰GTX TITAN Z评测-太平洋电脑网|date=5 June 2014|access-date=2020-08-16|archive-date=14 January 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230114032336/https://diy.pconline.com.cn/488/4883359_all.html|url-status=live}}

| 2x 7080

| 2x 561

| 705

| 876

| {{unk}}

| 1752.5
(7010)

| 2x 15

| 2x 2880:240:48

| 2x 6

| 2x 336.5

| 2x 384

|2x 33.8

|2x 169

|5046x2

|1682x2{{cite web |title=NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z Specs |url=https://www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/geforce-gtx-titan-z.c2575 |access-date=2020-02-26 |website=TechPowerUp |language=en}}

| 4.5

| 375

| $2999

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Fab (nm)

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (million)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" | Bus interface

! colspan="4" | Clock rate

! rowspan="2" | SMX count

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=geforce 700 1|Unified shaders: texture mapping units: render output units}}

! colspan="4" | Memory configuration

! colspan="2" |Fillrate

! colspan="2" |Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=geforce 700 9}}

! colspan="4" | Supported API version

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts)

! rowspan="2" | Release Price (USD)

! Average Boost (MHz)

! Max Boost{{efn|name=geforce 700 2|Max Boost depends on ASIC quality. For example, some GTX TITAN with over 80% ASIC quality can hit 1019 MHz by default, lower ASIC quality will be 1006 MHz or 993 MHz.}} (MHz)

! Memory (MHz)

! Size (GiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! DRAM type

! Bus width (bit)

!Pixel (GP/s)

!Texture (GT/s)

!Single precision

!Double precision

! Vulkan{{efn|name=geforce 700 11}}

! Direct3D{{efn|name=geforce 700 3}}

! OpenGL

! OpenCL

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Process

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (billion)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" | Bus interface

! colspan="3" | Clock Speeds

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=CoreConfig}}

! rowspan="2" |L2 Cache
(MiB)

! colspan="4" | Memory

! colspan="2" | Fillrate{{efn|name=PerfValues}}

! colspan="2" | Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=PerfValues}}{{efn|name=ProcessingPower}}

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts)

! rowspan="2" | SLI support

! Release price (USD)

! Boost (MHz)

! Memory (GT/s)

! Size (GiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! Bus type

! Bus width (bit)

! Pixel (GP/s){{efn|name=PixelFillrate}}

! Texture (GT/s){{efn|name=TextureFillrate}}

! Single precision

! Double precision

! MSRP

| February, 2016

| GM108

| rowspan="9" | TSMC
28HP

| {{unk}}

| {{unk}}

| PCIe 3.0 x8

| 1072

| 1176

| 1.8

| 512:24:8 (4)

| ?

| 1 / 2

| 14.4

| DDR3 / GDDR5

| 64

| 8.5
9.4

| 25.7
28.2

| 1,097.7
1,204.2

| 34.3
37.6

| 33

| rowspan="1" {{No}}

| {{okay|OEM}}

| August 20, 2015

| GM206-250

| rowspan="3" | 2.94

| rowspan="3" | 227

| rowspan="8" | PCIe 3.0 x16

| 1024

| 1188

| 6.6

| 768:48:32 (6)

| rowspan="4" | 1

| rowspan="2" | 2

| 105.7

| rowspan="8" | GDDR5

| rowspan="3" | 128

| 32.7
38.0

| 49.1
57.0

| 1,572.8
1,824.7

| 49.1
57.0

| 90 (75{{efn|name=GTX950NPC|Some GTX950 cards were released without power connector powered only by PCIe slot. These had limited power consumption and TPD to 75W.{{Cite web|url=https://www.anandtech.com/show/10250/gigabyte-adds-geforce-gtx-950-with-75w-power-consumption-to-lineup|title=GIGABYTE Adds 75W GeForce GTX 950 to Lineup|first=Anton|last=Shilov|website=www.anandtech.com|access-date=11 March 2020|archive-date=28 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200728210134/https://www.anandtech.com/show/10250/gigabyte-adds-geforce-gtx-950-with-75w-power-consumption-to-lineup|url-status=live}} }})

| rowspan="4" | 2-way SLI

| $159

| {{unk}}

| GM206

| 935

| {{unk}}

| 5

| rowspan="2" | 1024:64:32 (8)

| 80.0

| 29.9
 

| 59.8
 

| 1,914.9
,

| 59.8
 

| {{unk}}

| {{okay|OEM}}

| January 22, 2015

| GM206-300

| 1127

| 1178

| 7

| 2
4

| 112.1

| 36.0
37.6

| 72.1
75.3

| 2,308.0
2,412.5

| 72.1
75.3

| 120

| $199

| {{unk}}

| GM204

| rowspan="3" | 5.2

| rowspan="3" | 398

| 924

| {{unk}}

| 5

| 1280:80:48 (10)

| 3

| 120.0

| 192

| 44.3
 

| 73.9
 

| 2,365.4
,

| 73.9
 

| {{unk}}

| {{okay|OEM}}

| September 18, 2014

| GM204-200

| 1050

| 1178

| rowspan="4" | 7

| 1664:104:56 (13)

| 1.75

| 3.5 +
0.5{{efn|name=GTX960MemoryMess|For accessing its memory, the GTX 970 stripes data across 7 of its 8 32-bit physical memory lanes, at 196 GB/s. The last 1/8 of its memory (0.5 GiB on a 4 GiB card) is accessed on a non-interleaved solitary 32-bit connection at 28 GB/s, one seventh the speed of the rest of the memory space. Because this smaller memory pool uses the same connection as the 7th lane to the larger main pool, it contends with accesses to the larger block reducing the effective memory bandwidth not adding to it as an independent connection could.{{cite news |last1=Wasson |first1=Scott |date=January 26, 2015 |title=Nvidia: the GeForce GTX 970 works exactly as intended, A look inside the card's unusual memory config |url=http://techreport.com/review/27724/nvidia-the-geforce-gtx-970-works-exactly-as-intended |newspaper=The Tech Report |page=1 |access-date=2015-01-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150128051624/http://techreport.com/review/27724/nvidia-the-geforce-gtx-970-works-exactly-as-intended |archive-date=January 28, 2015 |url-status=live }}}}

| 196.3 +
28.0{{efn|name=GTX960MemoryMess}}

| 224 +
32{{efn|name=GTX960MemoryMess}}

| 58.8
65.9

| 109.2
122.5

| 3,494.4
3,920.3

| 109.2
122.5

| 145

| rowspan="4" | 4-way SLI

| $329

| September 18, 2014

| GM204-400

| 1126

| 1216

| 2048:128:64 (16)

| 2

| 4

| 224.3

| 256

| 72.0
77.8

| 144.1
155.6

| 4,612.0
4,980.7

| 144.1
155.6

| 165

| $549

| June 1, 2015

| GM200-310

| rowspan="2" | 8

| rowspan="2" | 601

| rowspan="2" | 1000

| rowspan="2" | 1075

| 2816:176:96 (22)

| rowspan="2" | 3

| 6

| rowspan="2" | 336.5

| rowspan="2" | 384

| rowspan="2" | 96.0
103.2

| 176.0
189.2

| 5,632.0
6,054.4

| 176.0
189.2

| rowspan="2" | 250

| $649

| March 17, 2015

| GM200-400

| 3072:192:96 (24)

| 12

| 192.0
206.4

| 6,144.0
6,604.8

| 192.0
206.4

| $999

! rowspan="2" | Launch

! rowspan="2" | Code name

! rowspan="2" | Process

! rowspan="2" | Transistors (billion)

! rowspan="2" | Die size (mm²)

! rowspan="2" | Bus interface

! colspan="3" | Clock speeds

! rowspan="2" | Core config{{efn|name=CoreConfig}}

! rowspan="2" | L2 Cache
(MiB)

! colspan="4" | Memory

! colspan="2" | Fillrate{{efn|name=PerfValues}}

! colspan="3" |Processing power (GFLOPS){{efn|name=PerfValues}}{{efn|name=ProcessingPower}}

! rowspan="2" | TDP (Watts)

! rowspan="2" | SLI support

! colspan="2" | Release price (USD)

! Boost core (MHz)

! Memory (GT/s)

! Size (GiB)

! Bandwidth (GB/s)

! Bus type

! Bus width (bit)

! Pixel (GP/s){{efn|name=PixelFillrate}}{{efn|As the GTX 1070 has one of the four GP104 GPCs disabled in the die, its frontend is only able to rasterize 48 pixels per clock.{{cite web|url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/10325/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-and-1070-founders-edition-review/29|title=The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 & GTX 1070 Founders Editions Review: Kicking Off the FinFET Generation|last=Smith|first=Ryan|access-date=2016-07-21|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160723082331/http://www.anandtech.com/show/10325/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-and-1070-founders-edition-review/29|archive-date=2016-07-23|url-status=live}} Analogically, the GTX 1060 features only two GPCs on its GP106 die, meaning that its frontend can only rasterize 32 pixels per clock. The remaining backend ROPs can still be used for tasks such as MSAA.{{cite web |url=http://www.anandtech.com/show/10540/the-geforce-gtx-1060-founders-edition-asus-strix-review |title=The GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition & ASUS Strix GTX 1060 Review |access-date=2017-02-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170218064526/http://www.anandtech.com/show/10540/the-geforce-gtx-1060-founders-edition-asus-strix-review |archive-date=2017-02-18 |url-status=live}}}}

! Texture (GT/s){{efn|name=TextureFillrate}}

! Half precision

! Single precision

! Double precision

! MSRP

! Founders Edition

| rowspan="2" | January 13, 2021

| rowspan="2" | GP108-200-A1

| rowspan="7" |Samsung
14LPP

| rowspan="4" | 1.8

| rowspan="4" | 74

| rowspan="4" | PCIe 3.0 x4

| 1228

| 1468

| 5

| rowspan="2" | 256:16:16
(2) (1)

| rowspan="2" | 0.25

| rowspan="5" | 2

| 40.1

| GDDR5

| rowspan="4" | 64

| 9.8
11.8

| 19.7
23.5

| ?

| 628.7
751.6

| 26.2
31.3

| 30

| rowspan="14" {{No}}

| rowspan="2" {{okay|OEM}}

| rowspan="12" {{N/a}}

| March 12, 2018

| GP108-310-A1

| 1379

| rowspan="2" | 384:24:16
(3) (1)

| rowspan="2" | 0.5

| 18.4
22.0

| 27.6
33.0

| 13.8
16.5

| 884.7
1,059.0

| 27.6
33.0

| $79

| October 25, 2016

| GP107-300-A1

| rowspan="3" | 3.3

| rowspan="3" | 132

| rowspan="17" | PCIe 3.0 x16

| 1354

| 1455

| rowspan="3" | 7

| 640:40:32
(5) (2)

| 1

| 112.0

| 128

| 43.3
46.6

| 54.1
58.8

| 27.0
29.1

| 1,733.1
1,862.4

| 54.1
58.2

| rowspan="3" | 75

| rowspan="2" | $109

| December 25, 2016

| GP104-140-A1

| rowspan="14" | TSMC
16FF

| 7.2

| 314

| rowspan="8" | 1506

| rowspan="7" | 1708

| rowspan="6" | 8

| rowspan="2" | 1152:72:48
(9) (2)

| rowspan="2" | 1.5

| rowspan="2" | 3

| rowspan="2" | 192.0