List of open letters by academics

{{Short description|none}}

{{More citations needed|date=May 2023}}

This article lists notable open letters that were initiated by scientists or other academics or have a substantial share of academic signees.

Open letters that are not open for signing by other academics or the public in general and have not received both a large number of signatures – in specific no less than 10 before 2000 and no less than 40 after 2010 – and substantial media attention are not included, nor are petitions. With the advent of the Internet and World Wide Web, such open letters may have become far more frequent.

Open letters targeting or defending individual academics or small groups of scholars{{cite news |title="Academic mobbing" undermines open inquiry and destroys the soul of universities |newspaper=The Economist |url=https://www.economist.com/open-future/2019/07/23/academic-mobbing-undermines-open-inquiry-and-destroys-the-soul-of-universities |access-date=16 May 2023}}{{cite web |last1=Carl |first1=Noah |date=11 February 2021 |title=A List of Academic Petitions and Open Letters |url=https://noahcarl.medium.com/a-list-of-academic-petitions-and-open-letters-995fadc0a088 |access-date=16 May 2023 |website=Medium |language=en}} as well as letters calling for retractions of specific studies are not included.

class="wikitable sortable"

! style="width:15%;" |Name

! style="width:5%;" |Year

! style="width:15%;" |Signatures

! style="width:10%;" |Scope / topic

! style="width:35%;" class=unsortable |Demands

! style="width:10%;" |Organized by

! style="width:5%;" |Demand achieved

! style="width:5%;" |Criticized

{{vanchor|Elsevier: NeuroImage transition - all editors have resigned over the high publication fee, and are starting a new non-profit journal, Imaging Neuroscience|Elsevier: NeuroImage transition - all editors have resigned over the high publication fee, and are starting a new non-profit journal, Imaging Neuroscience}}{{cite journal |last1=Sanderson |first1=Katharine |title=Editors quit top neuroscience journal to protest against open-access charges |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-01391-5 |journal=Nature |date=21 April 2023 |volume=616 |issue=7958 |pages=641 |language=en |doi=10.1038/d41586-023-01391-5|pmid=37085706 |s2cid=258275824 |doi-access=free }}{{cite news |title='It Feels Like Things Are Breaking Open': High Publishing Charges Spur Neuroscientists to Start Own Journal |url=https://www.chronicle.com/article/it-feels-like-things-are-breaking-open-high-access-charges-spur-neuroscientists-to-start-their-own-journal |access-date=20 May 2023 |work=The Chronicle of Higher Education |date=22 April 2023 |language=en}}{{cite news |last1=Mir |first1=Rory |title=Science Rebels Take on Major Publishers |url=https://www.eff.org/zh-hans/deeplinks/2023/05/science-rebels-take-major-publishers |access-date=20 May 2023 |work=Electronic Frontier Foundation |date=10 May 2023 |language=zh-hans}}{{cite news |last1=Quinn |first1=Ryan |title=Exodus From an Elsevier Neuroscience Journal |url=https://www.insidehighered.com/news/faculty-issues/research/2023/04/20/exodus-elsevier-neuroscience-journal |access-date=20 May 2023 |work=Inside Higher Ed |language=en}}{{cite news |title=40 editors at a scientific journal just resigned in protest of their publisher's "greed" |url=https://www.salon.com/2023/05/10/elsevier-editor-resignation-neuroimage/ |access-date=20 May 2023 |work=Salon |date=10 May 2023 |language=en}}

|2023

|{{Sort|42|42 academics}}

|Global

|All editors at NeuroImage and NeuroImage: Reports resigned because they oppose the large fee ($3450) that the journal owner, publishing giant Elsevier, charges authors to make their scientific papers open access (OA). As Elsevier refused to reduce the fee, they launch a new OA journal Imaging Neuroscience hosted by the non-profit publisher MIT Press.{{cite news |title=News at a glance: A new malaria vaccine, a Parkinson's test, and editors resign |url=https://www.science.org/content/article/news-glance-new-malaria-vaccine-parkinson-s-test-and-editors-resign |access-date=20 May 2023 |work=Science |language=en}} They commit to make the new journal replace their abandoned one as "the top journal in [their] field" and hope they demonstrate "the way forward in non-profit publishing".{{cite web |title=Elsevier: NeuroImage transition - all editors have resigned over the high publication fee, and are starting a new non-profit journal, Imaging Neuroscience |url=https://imaging-neuroscience.org/Announcement.pdf |access-date=20 May 2023}}

|(Group action of full editors-team)

|{{Yes|{{tooltip|DA|Direct action solved or addresses the problem without demands being met}}}}

|{{No}}

Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter{{Cite news |last1=Metz |first1=Cade |last2=Schmidt |first2=Gregory |date=2023-03-29 |title=Elon Musk and Others Call for Pause on A.I., Citing 'Profound Risks to Society' |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/29/technology/ai-artificial-intelligence-musk-risks.html |access-date=2023-05-16 |issn=0362-4331}}{{Cite news |date=2023-03-29 |title=Elon Musk among experts urging a halt to AI training |language=en-GB |work=BBC News |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-65110030 |access-date=2023-05-16}}{{Cite web |last=Kelly |first=Samantha Murphy |date=2023-03-29 |title=Elon Musk and other tech leaders call for pause in 'out of control' AI race {{!}} CNN Business |url=https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/29/tech/ai-letter-elon-musk-tech-leaders/index.html |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=CNN |language=en}}{{Cite news |last1=Narayan |first1=Jyoti |last2=Hu |first2=Krystal |last3=Coulter |first3=Martin |last4=Mukherjee |first4=Supantha |last5=Hu |first5=Krystal |date=2023-04-05 |title=Elon Musk and others urge AI pause, citing 'risks to society' |language=en |work=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/technology/musk-experts-urge-pause-training-ai-systems-that-can-outperform-gpt-4-2023-03-29/ |access-date=2023-05-16}}

|2023

|{{Sort|1000|>1,000 incl. prominent figures in software & tech and risk researchers}}

|Global

|"AI labs to immediately pause for at least 6 months the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4" due to "profound risks to society and humanity".{{Cite web |title=Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter |url=https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/ |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=Future of Life Institute |language=en-US}}

|Future of Life Institute

|

|{{Sort|Yes2|{{yes|{{tooltip|Yes|(extensively)}}}}}}{{Cite news |last=Paul |first=Kari |date=2023-04-01 |title=Letter signed by Elon Musk demanding AI research pause sparks controversy |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/mar/31/ai-research-pause-elon-musk-chatgpt |access-date=2023-05-16 |issn=0261-3077|quote=Among the research cited was "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots", a well-known paper co-authored by Margaret Mitchell, who previously oversaw ethical AI research at Google. Mitchell, now chief ethical scientist at AI firm Hugging Face, criticised the letter, telling Reuters it was unclear what counted as "more powerful than GPT4".
"By treating a lot of questionable ideas as a given, the letter asserts a set of priorities and a narrative on AI that benefits the supporters of FLI," she said. "Ignoring active harms right now is a privilege that some of us don't have."}}
{{Cite web |date=2023-03-30 |title=Musk's AI letter is a 'hot mess' of hype, say critics |url=https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20230330-musk-s-ai-letter-is-a-hot-mess-of-hype-say-critics |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=France 24 |language=en|quote=But Timnit Gebru, whose academic paper was cited to support that claim, wrote on Twitter on Thursday that her article actually warns against making such inflated claims about AI.
"They basically say the opposite of what we say and cite our paper," she wrote.
Her co-author Emily Bender said the letter was a "hot mess" and was "just dripping with AI hype".}}
{{Cite web |last=Goswami |first=Rohan |date=2023-04-14 |title=OpenAI CEO Sam Altman addresses letter from Musk and other tech leaders calling for A.I. pause |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/14/openai-ceo-altman-addresses-letter-from-musk-wozniak-calling-for-ai-pause.html |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=CNBC |language=en}}{{cite news |title=News at a glance: Benin Bronze's source, a supermassive black hole, and Aboriginal knowledge |url=https://www.science.org/content/article/news-glance-benin-bronze-s-source-supermassive-black-hole-and-aboriginal-knowledge |access-date=18 May 2023 |work=www.science.org |language=en}}

{{vanchor|Open Letter to the European Commission on the Cyber Resilience Act}}{{cite news |last1=Sawers |first1=Paul |date=18 April 2023 |title=In letter to EU, open source bodies say Cyber Resilience Act could have 'chilling effect' on software development |work=TechCrunch |url=https://techcrunch.com/2023/04/18/in-letter-to-european-commission-open-source-bodies-say-cyber-resilience-act-could-have-chilling-effect-on-software-development/ |access-date=16 May 2023}}{{cite news |last1=Vaughan-Nichols |first1=Steven J. |title=EU attempts to secure software could hurt open source |language=en |work=www.theregister.com |url=https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/12/eu_cyber_resilience_act/ |access-date=16 May 2023}}

|2023

|{{Sort|x|Many open source software organizations incl. OSI and TDF}}

|European Union / {{tooltip|Global|Free software is global}}

|Changes to the proposed Cyber Resilience Act due to "unnecessary economic and technological risk to the EU" and improving engagement with the under-represented open source software community as "more than 70% of the software in Europe [open source/FOSS] is about to be regulated without an in-depth consultation" and potential chilling effects of OSS development.

|The Eclipse Foundation

|

|

{{vanchor|An open letter regarding research on reflecting sunlight to reduce the risks of climate change}}{{Cite news |last=Milman |first=Oliver |date=2023-03-01 |title=Deflecting sun's rays to cool overheating Earth needs study, scientists say |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/mar/01/sun-rays-cool-overheating-earth-james-hansen-scientists-letter |access-date=2023-05-16 |issn=0261-3077}}

|2023

|{{Sort|110|>110 academics}}

|Global

|Acceleration of research on "atmospheric aerosols and their potential to increase the reflection of sunlight from the atmosphere to address climate risk".

|

|

|{{yes}}

{{vanchor|Open Letter calling for an International Non-Use Agreement on Solar Geoengineering}}{{Cite news |last=Milman |first=Oliver |date=2022-12-25 |title=Can geoengineering fix the climate? Hundreds of scientists say not so fast |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/25/can-controversial-geoengineering-fix-climate-crisis |access-date=2023-05-16 |issn=0261-3077}}{{Cite news |last=Bokat-Lindell |first=Spencer |date=2023-01-11 |title=Opinion {{!}} Should We Block the Sun to Counter Climate Change? |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/11/opinion/geoengineering-climate-change-solar.html |access-date=2023-05-16 |issn=0362-4331}}

|2022

|{{Sort|380|>380 academics}}

|Global

|"[I]mmediate political action from governments, the United Nations, and other actors to prevent the normalization of solar geoengineering as a climate policy option".

|16 scholars{{Cite web |title=Signatories |url=https://www.solargeoeng.org/non-use-agreement/signatories/ |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=Solar Geoengineering Non-Use Agreement |language=en-US}}

|{{no}}

|{{yes}}

{{vanchor|Fossil Free Research Open Letter}}{{cite news |last1=Harvey |first1=Fiona |author-link=Fiona Harvey |date=21 March 2022 |title=Universities must reject fossil fuel cash for climate research, say academics |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/mar/21/universities-must-reject-fossil-fuel-cash-for-climate-research-say-academics |access-date=16 May 2023 |work=The Guardian}}{{cite news |last1=Limb |first1=Lottie |date=25 July 2022 |title=Cambridge University set to rename BP Institute - but is it enough? |language=en |work=euronews |url=https://www.euronews.com/green/2022/07/25/cambridge-university-to-remove-bps-name-from-building-but-students-say-big-oils-cash-must- |access-date=16 May 2023}}{{cite news |last1=Tabuchi |first1=Hiroko |author-link=Hiroko Tabuchi |date=16 August 2022 |title=Kicking oil companies out of school |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/16/climate/cambridge-university-oil-gas-funding.html |access-date=16 May 2023}}

|2022

|{{Sort|800|>800 incl. Nobel laureates & IPCC authors}}

|Global

|Universities should stop accepting funding from fossil fuel companies to conduct climate research.

|Fossil Free Research{{cite web |title=Fossil Free Research |url=https://fossilfreeresearch.org/ |access-date=16 May 2023 |website=Fossil Free Research |language=en}}

|{{no}}

|

{{vanchor|2022 open letter from Nobel laureates in support of Ukraine}}

|2022

|{{Sort|200 Nobel|>200 Nobel laureates}}

|Russia, Ukraine

|Independence of the Ukrainian people and freedom of the Ukrainian state (in face of the 2022 Russian invasion of the country).

|Roald Hoffmann, Richard J. Roberts

|{{no}}

|

{{vanchor|An open letter of Russian scientists and science journalists against the war in Ukraine}}{{Cite news |last=Fazackerley |first=Anna |date=2022-04-02 |title='No hope for science in Russia': the academics trying to flee to the west |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/02/no-hope-science-russia-academics-trying-flee-to-west |access-date=2023-05-16 |issn=0261-3077}}{{cite news |title=Russia-West scientific collaboration a casualty of Ukraine war |url=https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20220326-russia-west-scientific-collaboration-a-casualty-of-ukraine-war |access-date=16 May 2023 |work=France 24 |date=26 March 2022 |language=en}}{{Cite news |last=Chawla |first=Dalmeet Singh |date=2022-05-27 |title=Russian Academics Aim to Punish Colleagues Who Backed Ukraine Invasion |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/27/science/russia-ukraine-science-academy.html |access-date=2023-05-16 |issn=0362-4331}}

|2022

|{{Sort|8000|>8,000 academics and science journalists of Russia}}

|Russia, Ukraine

|Condemnation of the war against Ukraine with "responsibility for unleashing a new war in Europe [lying] entirely with Russia".{{cite web |title=Открытое письмо российских ученых и научных журналистов против войны с Украиной |url=https://www.t-invariant.org/2022/02/we-are-against-war/ |website=Т-инвариант / T-invariant |access-date=16 May 2023 |language=ru-RU |date=24 February 2022}}

|

|NA

|

{{vanchor|Montreal Declaration on Animal Exploitation}}{{cite news |date=6 October 2022 |title=Four hundred philosophers declare animal exploitation 'unjust and morally indefensible' |language=en |work=Le Monde.fr |url=https://www.lemonde.fr/en/opinion/article/2022/10/06/four-hundred-philosophers-declare-animal-exploitation-unjust-and-morally-indefensible_5999321_23.html}}

|2022

|{{Sort|500|>500 academics (moral and political philosophy)}}

|Global

|"Insofar as it involves unnecessary violence and harm, [they] declare that animal exploitation is unjust and morally indefensible".

|

|{{tooltip|NA|unspecified demands, proposals or goals}}

|{{yes}}

Fulfil the NPT: From nuclear threats to human security

|2022

|{{Sort|1000|>1,000 incl. many academics}}

|Global

|Four steps towards a nuclear-weapon-free world to take by the Tenth Review Conference of the Non-Proliferation Treaty in 2022.

|NoFirstUse Global

|

|

{{vanchor|Statement by other Academics in support of Bill No. 28 of 2022}}{{Cite web |title=Over 100 academics support proposed changes to Malta's abortion laws |url=https://timesofmalta.com/articles/view/100-academics-support-proposed-changes-maltas-abortion-laws.999646 |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=Times of Malta |date=5 December 2022 |language=en-gb}}

|2022

|{{Sort|100|>100 academics}}

|Malta

|Passage of abortion law changes Bill No. 28 of 2022 as is.

|

|

|

{{vanchor|Scientists to President Biden: Follow the Science, Stop Fossil Fuels}}{{Cite web |last=Schlosberg |first=Mark |date=2022-04-07 |title=Scientists to Biden: Don't Ramp Up Fossil Fuels |url=https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/2022/04/07/biden-fossil-fuels-scientists/ |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=Food & Water Watch |language=en-US}}

|2022

|{{Sort|275|275 academics}}

|USA / Global

|Halting recent moves towards increasing fossil fuel production and instead take bold action to rapidly reduce fossil fuel extraction and infrastructure by President Biden.

|Scientists Bob Howarth, Mark Jacobson, Michael Mann, Sandra Steingraber, and Peter Kalmus

|{{no}}

|

{{vanchor|Scientists & Experts Want Climate Action – An Open Letter to the White House}}{{cite web |title=UCS Delivers Letter to White House Signed by More Than 1,500 Scientists Urging Biden to Cut Emissions by at Least Half by 2030 {{!}} Union of Concerned Scientists |url=https://www.ucsusa.org/about/news/ucs-delivers-letter-white-house-signed-more-1500-scientists-urging-biden-cut-emissions-0 |website=www.ucsusa.org |access-date=16 May 2023 |language=en}}

|2021

|{{Sort|1500|>1,500 academics incl. 5 senior/lead IPCC authors}}

|USA / Global

|"President Joe Biden and his administration to commit to reducing U.S. heat-trapping emissions by at least 50 percent below 2005 levels by 2030".

|Union of Concerned Scientists

|

|

{{vanchor|It is essential to Remove Climate-Harming Logging and Fossil Fuel Provisions from Reconciliation and Infrastructure Bills}}{{Cite web |last=Ketcham |first=Christopher |date=2022-06-29 |title=Logging is destroying southern forests — and dividing US environmentalists |url=https://grist.org/energy/logging-biomass-nature-conservancy/ |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=Grist |language=en-us}}{{Cite web |date=2021-11-08 |title=Scientists urge Biden to remove logging, fossil fuels, biomass from budget bills |url=https://news.mongabay.com/2021/11/scientists-urge-biden-to-remove-logging-fossil-fuels-biomass-from-budget-bills/ |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=Mongabay Environmental News |language=en-US}}

|2021

|{{Sort|100|>100 academics}}

|USA / Global

|Removal of logging and fossil fuel provisions from reconciliation and infrastructure bills by President Biden and members of Congress.{{cite web |title=Open Letter to President Biden and Members of Congress from Scientists: It is essential to Remove Climate-Harming Logging and Fossil Fuel Provisions from Reconciliation and Infrastructure Bills |url=https://johnmuirproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/ScientistLetterOpposingLoggingProvisionsInBBB_BIF4Nov21.pdf |access-date=17 May 2023}}

|

|

|

{{vanchor|Scientists and Engineers Letter to President Biden on the Nuclear Posture Review}}{{Cite news |last=Sanger |first=David E. |date=2021-12-17 |title=Hundreds of Scientists Ask Biden to Cut the U.S. Nuclear Arsenal |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/16/us/politics/scientists-letter-nuclear-arsenal.html |access-date=2023-05-16 |issn=0362-4331}}{{cite web |title=Scientists and Engineers Letter to President Biden on the Nuclear Posture Review |url=https://ucs-documents.s3.amazonaws.com/global-security/letter-POTUS-NPR-dated-12-16-21.pdf |access-date=17 May 2023}}

|2021

|{{Sort|700|~700 scientists and engineers incl. 21 Nobel laureates}}

|USA / Global

|President Biden to "use his forthcoming declaration of a new national strategy for managing nuclear weapons as a chance to cut the U.S. arsenal by a third, and to declare, for the first time, that the United States would never be the first to use nuclear weapons in a conflict".

|

|

|

{{vanchor|An Open Letter from U.S. Scientists Imploring President Biden to End the Fossil Fuel Era}}{{Cite web |title=To Avert 'Uncontrollable Climate Chaos,' Scientists Tell Biden to Stop Backing Fossil Fuels |url=https://www.commondreams.org/news/2021/10/07/avert-uncontrollable-climate-chaos-scientists-tell-biden-stop-backing-fossil-fuels |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=www.commondreams.org |language=en}}

|2021

|{{Sort|330|>330 academics}}

|USA / Global

|

  • "Completely stop federally authorized fossil fuel expansion{{cite news |last1=Taylor |first1=Damian Carrington Matthew |title=Revealed: the 'carbon bombs' set to trigger catastrophic climate breakdown |url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2022/may/11/fossil-fuel-carbon-bombs-climate-breakdown-oil-gas |access-date=17 May 2023 |work=the Guardian |date=6 June 2022 |language=en}}{{cite news |last1=Bearak |first1=Max |title=It's Not Just Willow: Oil and Gas Projects Are Back in a Big Way |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/06/climate/oil-gas-drilling-investment-worldwide-willow.html |access-date=17 May 2023 |work=The New York Times |date=6 April 2023}}
  • Declare a climate emergency
  • Abandon industry delay{{cite journal |last1=Lamb |first1=William F. |last2=Mattioli |first2=Giulio |last3=Levi |first3=Sebastian |last4=Roberts |first4=J. Timmons |last5=Capstick |first5=Stuart |last6=Creutzig |first6=Felix |last7=Minx |first7=Jan C. |last8=Müller-Hansen |first8=Finn |last9=Culhane |first9=Trevor |last10=Steinberger |first10=Julia K. |title=Discourses of climate delay |journal=Global Sustainability |date=2020 |volume=3 |pages=e17 |doi=10.1017/sus.2020.13 |s2cid=222245720 |language=en |issn=2059-4798|doi-access=free }} tactics"

|Biologist Dr. Sandra Steingraber, climate scientist Dr. Peter Kalmus, advocacy groups Center for Biological Diversity and Food & Water Watch

|

|

{{vanchor|Stop attempts to criminalise nonviolent climate protest}}{{Cite news |last=Taylor |first=Matthew |date=2021-04-29 |title=Environment protest being criminalised around world, say experts |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/apr/19/environment-protest-being-criminalised-around-world-say-experts |access-date=2023-05-16 |issn=0261-3077}}

|2021

|{{Sort|400|>400 academics}}

|Global

|End of the criminalization of non-violent civil disobedience from direct action climate activist groups.

|Oscar Berglund, others

|

|

{{vanchor|Academic Open Letter in Support of the TRIPS Intellectual Property Waiver Proposal}}{{Cite news |date=2021-07-14 |title=Over 100 academic & IP experts sign an open letter in support of TRIPS waiver |work=The Times of India |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/over-100-academic-ip-experts-sign-an-open-letter-in-support-of-trips-waiver/articleshow/84418588.cms |access-date=2023-05-16 |issn=0971-8257}}

|2021

|{{Sort|100|>100 academics (international intellectual property)}}

|Global

|A "temporary TRIPS waiver – as proposed by India and South Africa and supported by more than 100 countries – [as a] necessary and proportionate legal measure towards the clearing of existing intellectual property barriers to scaling up of production of COVID-19 health technologies in a direct, consistent and effective fashion".

|

|{{no}}

|

{{vanchor|WTO must ban harmful fisheries subsidies}}{{Cite journal |last=Jones |first=Nicola |date=2023-03-22 |title=Not enough fish in the sea |url=https://knowablemagazine.org/article/food-environment/2023/how-to-stop-overfishing |journal=Knowable Magazine |language=en |doi=10.1146/knowable-032223-1|s2cid=257702482 |doi-access=free }}{{Cite web |title=Op-ed: It's time to stop subsidizing overfishing {{!}} SeafoodSource |url=https://www.seafoodsource.com/news/environment-sustainability/oped-it-s-time-to-stop-subsidizing-overfishing |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=www.seafoodsource.com |language=en}}{{Cite web |last=Australia |first=University of Western |title=Scientists join international push to ban harmful fisheries subsidies |url=https://phys.org/news/2021-10-scientists-international-fisheries-subsidies.html |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=phys.org |language=en}}

|2021

|{{Sort|296|296 academics}}{{Cite journal |last1=Sumaila |first1=U. Rashid |last2=Skerritt |first2=Daniel J. |last3=Schuhbauer |first3=Anna |last4=Villasante |first4=Sebastian |last5=Cisneros-Montemayor |first5=Andrés M. |last6=Sinan |first6=Hussain |last7=Burnside |first7=Duncan |last8=Abdallah |first8=Patrízia Raggi |last9=Abe |first9=Keita |last10=Addo |first10=Kwasi A. |last11=Adelsheim |first11=Julia |last12=Adewumi |first12=Ibukun J. |last13=Adeyemo |first13=Olanike K. |last14=Adger |first14=Neil |last15=Adotey |first15=Joshua |date=2021-10-29 |title=WTO must ban harmful fisheries subsidies |url=https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abm1680 |journal=Science |language=en |volume=374 |issue=6567 |pages=544 |doi=10.1126/science.abm1680 |pmid=34709891 |s2cid=240153044 |issn=0036-8075|hdl=11585/836841 |hdl-access=free }}

|Global

|WTO to eliminate increasing harmful fisheries subsidies.

|

|

|

{{vanchor|It Is Time to Address Airborne Transmission of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)}}{{Cite web |last=Sealy |first=Amanda |date=2022-04-10 |title=This invisible Covid-19 mitigation measure is finally getting the attention it deserves |url=https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/10/health/covid-19-ventilation-matters-wellness/index.html |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=CNN |language=en}}

|2020

|{{Sort|239|>239 academics}}{{Cite journal |last1=Morawska |first1=Lidia |last2=Milton |first2=Donald K |date=2020-07-06 |title=It Is Time to Address Airborne Transmission of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) |journal=Clinical Infectious Diseases |volume=71 |issue=9 |language=en |pages=2311–2313 |doi=10.1093/cid/ciaa939 |issn=1058-4838 |pmc=7454469 |pmid=32628269}}

|Global

|WHO, medical community and relevant national and other international bodies to "recognize the potential for airborne spread" of COVID-19 by around the time of the letter.

|Lidia Morawska, Donald K Milton

|{{No}}

|

{{vanchor|Call to stop "Chain of Killings"}}{{cite news |date=4 October 2017 |title=Philippines academics condemn Duterte's deadly war on drugs - Study International |url=https://www.studyinternational.com/news/philippines-academics-condemn-dutertes-deadly-war-drugs/ |access-date=16 May 2023}}

|2020

|{{Sort|100|>100 academics}}

|Philippine

|End to President Rodrigo Duterte's "bloody war on drugs" and the creation of a Truth Commission.

|

|{{no}}

|

{{vanchor|A Letter on Justice and Open Debate}}

|2020

|{{Sort|153|153; mostly scholars and writers}}

|Global

|Condemnation of cancel culture and liberal intolerance and defending free speech, making an argument that hostility to free speech was becoming widespread on what could be described as "the political left" as well.

|Thomas Chatterton Williams, Robert Worth, George Packer, David Greenberg, Mark Lilla

|NA

|{{Sort|Yes2|{{yes|{{tooltip|Yes|(extensively)}}}}}}{{cite news |last1=Yang |first1=Jeff |title=The problem with 'the letter' |url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/10/opinions/the-letter-harpers-cancel-culture-open-debate-yang/index.html |accessdate=8 September 2020 |work=CNN}}{{cite news |last1=Schuessler |first1=Jennifer |title=An Open Letter on Free Expression Draws a Counterblast |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/10/arts/open-letter-debate.html |accessdate=July 12, 2020 |work=The New York Times |date=July 10, 2020}}

{{vanchor|A warning on climate and the risk of societal collapse}}{{cite news |last1=Ketcham |first1=Christopher |last2=Gibbs |first2=Jeff |date=31 January 2021 |title=Op-Ed: Collapseologists are warning humanity that business-as-usual will make the Earth uninhabitable |work=Los Angeles Times |url=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-01-31/societal-collapse-collapseology-climate-change |access-date=16 May 2023}}

|2020

|{{Sort|258|258 mostly academics}}

|Global

|Engagement with the risk of disruption and even collapse of societies due to climate change by policymakers.

|Gesa Weyhenmeyer, Will Steffen

|{{tooltip|NA|unspecified demands, proposals or goals}}

|

{{vanchor|We declare our support for Extinction Rebellion}}{{cite news |last1=Cox |first1=Lisa |date=19 September 2019 |title=Hundreds of Australian academics declare support for climate rebellion |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/sep/20/hundreds-of-australian-academics-declare-support-for-climate-rebellion |access-date=16 May 2023}}

|2019

|{{Sort|250|>250 academics at Australian universities}}

|Global

|Declaration of support for Extinction Rebellion and sufficient change of Australian government's inaction on the climate crisis. It is based on {{tooltip|a 2018 open letter|"Act now to prevent an environmental catastrophe" which appears to not have received any media attention.}}.

|

|{{tooltip|NA|unspecified demands, proposals or goals}}

|

{{vanchor|School climate strike children's brave stand has our support}}{{cite news |last1=Taylor |first1=Matthew |date=13 February 2019 |title=Academics back UK schools' climate change strikes |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/feb/13/academics-back-uk-schools-climate-change-strikes |access-date=16 May 2023}}

|2019

|{{Sort|224|224 academics}}

|Global

|Declaration of support for School Strikes for Climate.

|

|{{tooltip|NA|unspecified demands, proposals or goals}}

|

{{vanchor|The EU needs a stability and wellbeing pact, not more growth}}{{cite journal |last1=Mastini |first1=Riccardo |last2=Kallis |first2=Giorgos |last3=Hickel |first3=Jason |date=1 January 2021 |title=A Green New Deal without growth? |journal=Ecological Economics |language=en |volume=179 |pages=106832 |doi=10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106832 |s2cid=225007846 |issn=0921-8009}}{{cite news |date=16 September 2018 |title=The EU needs a stability and wellbeing pact, not more growth |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/sep/16/the-eu-needs-a-stability-and-wellbeing-pact-not-more-growth |access-date=16 May 2023}}

|2018

|{{Sort|238|238 academics}}

|Global

|"Plan[ning]" for a post-growth future in which human and ecological wellbeing is prioritised over GDP by the European Union and its member states.

|Wellbeing Economy Alliance and others

|{{tooltip|NA|unspecified demands, proposals or goals}}

|

{{vanchor|An Open Letter from Scientists to President-Elect Trump on Climate Change}}{{cite news |last1=Lemonick |first1=Michael D. |title=An Open Letter from Scientists to President-Elect Trump on Climate Change |language=en |work=Scientific American Blog Network |url=https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/an-open-letter-from-scientists-to-president-elect-trump-on-climate-change/ |access-date=16 May 2023}}

|2016

|{{Sort|800|>800 academics (Earth science and energy)}}

|USA / Global

|Six steps of immediate and sustained action to take by Donald Trump against human-caused climate change.

|

|{{no}}

|

{{vanchor|Science and the Public Interest – An Open Letter to President-Elect Trump and the 115th Congress}}{{Cite web |date=2016-12-01 |title=2,300 Leading Scientists Send Trump A Clear Warning: We're Watching You |url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/2300-scientists-letter-donald-trump_n_583f2bcbe4b017f37fe238df |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=HuffPost |language=en}}{{vanchor
}

|2016

|{{Sort|2000|>2,000 academics}}

|USA / Global

|Sufficient funding of scientific research as well as "support[ing] and rely[ing] on science as a key input for crafting public policy" by the incoming administration.

|Union of Concerned Scientists

|{{No}}

|

|-

|{{vanchor|Open Letter to Google From 80 Internet Scholars: Release RTBF Compliance Data}}{{cite news |last1=Kiss |first1=Jemima |date=14 May 2015 |title=Dear Google: open letter from 80 academics on 'right to be forgotten' |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/may/14/dear-google-open-letter-from-80-academics-on-right-to-be-forgotten |access-date=16 May 2023}}

|2015

|{{Sort|80|80 academics}}

|Global – Google

|More transparency of Google's right to be forgotten (RTBF) processes.

|

|

|

|-

|{{vanchor|Open Letter on Artificial Intelligence}}

|2015

|{{Sort|150|>150 incl. Stephen Hawking, Elon Musk, and many AI experts}}

|Global

|{{Excerpt|Open Letter on Artificial Intelligence|Purpose|paragraphs=1|hat=no}}[...]

|Future of Life Institute

|NA

|

|-

|{{vanchor|An Open Letter From Internet Engineers to the U.S. Congress}}{{Cite magazine |last=Sterling |first=Bruce |title=Internet engineers don't like PIPA and SOPA |language=en-US |magazine=Wired |url=https://www.wired.com/2011/12/internet-engineers-dont-like-pipa-and-sopa/ |access-date=2023-05-16 |issn=1059-1028}}

|2011

|{{Sort|83|83 prominent Internet inventors and engineers}}

|USA, Canada / Global

|Stoppage of SOPA and PIPA Internet blacklist bills.{{Cite web |last=Eckersley |first=Parker Higgins and Peter |date=2011-12-15 |title=An Open Letter From Internet Engineers to the U.S. Congress |url=https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/12/internet-inventors-warn-against-sopa-and-pipa |access-date=2023-05-16 |website=Electronic Frontier Foundation |language=en}}

|Electronic Frontier Foundation

|{{Yes}}

|{{No}}

|-

|{{vanchor|Open letter from ten Members of the Russian Academy of Sciences to the President|text=Open letter from ten Members of the Russian Academy of Sciences to the President}}

|2007

|{{Sort|10|10 members of the Russian Academy of Sciences}}

|Russia

|{{Excerpt|Academicians' letter|Main issues|paragraphs=1|hat=no}}

|

|{{no|No}}

|{{yes}}{{cite web |url=http://www.religio.ru/arch/24Jul2007/news/15118.html |script-title=ru:После Глазычева православная общественность взялась за академика Гинзбурга |author= |date=July 24, 2007 |publisher= |language=russian |accessdate=April 2, 2010}}

|-

|{{vanchor|Open letter to Gorbachev}}

|1990

|{{Sort|30|30 academics incl. Nobel laureates}}

|Russia

|Preventing privatisation of land itself, instead of a Georgist system of common ownership and the collection of public revenue through land-value taxation.

|

|

|

|}

See also

References