Mersenne prime#Theorems about Mersenne numbers

{{unsolved|mathematics|Are there infinitely many Mersenne primes?}}

Many fundamental questions about Mersenne primes remain unresolved. It is not even known whether the set of Mersenne primes is finite or infinite.

The Lenstra–Pomerance–Wagstaff conjecture claims that there are infinitely many Mersenne primes and predicts their order of growth and frequency: For every number {{mvar|n}}, there should on average be about $e^\backslash gamma\backslash cdot\backslash log\_2(10)\; \backslash approx\; 5.92$ primes {{mvar|p}} with {{mvar|n}} decimal digits for which $M\_p$ is prime. Here, {{mvar|γ}} is the Euler–Mascheroni constant.

It is also not known whether infinitely many Mersenne numbers with prime exponents are composite, although this would follow from widely believed conjectures about prime numbers, for example, the infinitude of Sophie Germain primes congruent to 3 (mod 4). For these primes {{mvar|p}}, {{math|2p + 1}} (which is also prime) will divide {{mvar|M_p}}, for example, {{math|23 {{!}} M₁₁}}, {{math|47 {{!}} M₂₃}}, {{math|167 {{!}} M₈₃}}, {{math|263 {{!}} M₁₃₁}}, {{math|359 {{!}} M₁₇₉}}, {{math|383 {{!}} M₁₉₁}}, {{math|479 {{!}} M₂₃₉}}, and {{math|503 {{!}} M₂₅₁}} {{OEIS|id=A002515}}. For these primes {{mvar|p}}, {{math|2p + 1}} is congruent to 7 mod 8, so 2 is a quadratic residue mod {{math|2p + 1}}, and the multiplicative order of 2 mod {{math|2p + 1}} must divide $\backslash frac\{(2p+1)-1\}\{2\}\; =\; p$. Since {{mvar|p}} is a prime, it must be {{mvar|p}} or 1. However, it cannot be 1 since $\backslash Phi\_1(2)\; =\; 1$ and 1 has no prime factors, so it must be {{mvar|p}}. Hence, {{math|2p + 1}} divides $\backslash Phi\_p(2)\; =\; 2^p-1$ and $2^p-1\; =\; M\_p$ cannot be prime.

The first four Mersenne primes are {{math|1=M₂ = 3}}, {{math|1=M₃ = 7}}, {{math|1=M₅ = 31}} and {{math|1=M₇ = 127}} and because the first Mersenne prime starts at {{math|M₂}}, all Mersenne primes are congruent to 3 (mod 4). Other than {{math|1=M₀ = 0}} and {{math|1=M₁ = 1}}, all other Mersenne numbers are also congruent to 3 (mod 4). Consequently, in the prime factorization of a Mersenne number ( {{math|≥ M₂}} ) there must be at least one prime factor congruent to 3 (mod 4).

A basic theorem about Mersenne numbers states that if {{mvar|M_p}} is prime, then the exponent {{math|p}} must also be prime. This follows from the identity

$$\backslash begin\{align\}$$

2^{ab}-1

&=(2^a-1)\cdot \left(1+2^a+2^{2a}+2^{3a}+\cdots+2^{(b-1)a}\right)\\

&=(2^b-1)\cdot \left(1+2^b+2^{2b}+2^{3b}+\cdots+2^{(a-1)b}\right).

\end{align}

This rules out primality for Mersenne numbers with a composite exponent, such as {{math|1=M₄ = 2⁴ − 1 = 15 = 3 × 5 = (2² − 1) × (1 + 2²)}}.

Though the above examples might suggest that {{mvar|M_p}} is prime for all primes {{mvar|p}}, this is not the case, and the smallest counterexample is the Mersenne number

: {{math|1=M₁₁ = 2¹¹ − 1 = 2047 = 23 × 89}}.

The evidence at hand suggests that a randomly selected Mersenne number is much more likely to be prime than an arbitrary randomly selected odd integer of similar size.{{cite web| url=http://primes.utm.edu/mersenne/heuristic.html|title=Heuristics: Deriving the Wagstaff Mersenne Conjecture| first=Chris|last=Caldwell}} Nonetheless, prime values of {{mvar|M_p}} appear to grow increasingly sparse as {{mvar|p}} increases. For example, eight of the first 11 primes {{mvar|p}} give rise to a Mersenne prime {{mvar|M_p}} (the correct terms on Mersenne's original list), while {{mvar|M_p}} is prime for only 43 of the first two million prime numbers (up to 32,452,843).

Since Mersenne numbers grow very rapidly, the search for Mersenne primes is a difficult task, even though there is a simple efficient test to determine whether a given Mersenne number is prime: the Lucas–Lehmer primality test (LLT), which makes it much easier to test the primality of Mersenne numbers than that of most other numbers of the same size. The search for the largest known prime has somewhat of a cult following.{{Citation needed|date=May 2023}} Consequently, a large amount of computer power has been expended searching for new Mersenne primes, much of which is now done using distributed computing.

Arithmetic modulo a Mersenne number is particularly efficient on a binary computer, making them popular choices when a prime modulus is desired, such as the Park–Miller random number generator. To find a primitive polynomial of Mersenne number order requires knowing the factorization of that number, so Mersenne primes allow one to find primitive polynomials of very high order. Such primitive trinomials are used in pseudorandom number generators with very large periods such as the Mersenne twister, generalized shift register and Lagged Fibonacci generators.

{{main|Euclid–Euler theorem}}

Mersenne primes {{math|M_p}} are closely connected to perfect numbers. In the 4th century BC, Euclid proved that if {{math|2^p − 1}} is prime, then {{math|2^{p − 1}(2^p − 1}}) is a perfect number. In the 18th century, Leonhard Euler proved that, conversely, all even perfect numbers have this form.Chris K. Caldwell, [http://primes.utm.edu/mersenne/index.html Mersenne Primes: History, Theorems and Lists] This is known as the Euclid–Euler theorem. It is unknown whether there are any odd perfect numbers.

Mersenne primes take their name from the 17th-century French scholar Marin Mersenne, who compiled what was supposed to be a list of Mersenne primes with exponents up to 257. The exponents listed by Mersenne in 1644 were as follows:

::2, 3, 5, 7, 13, 17, 19, 31, 67, 127, 257.

His list replicated the known primes of his time with exponents up to 19. His next entry, 31, was correct, but the list then became largely incorrect, as Mersenne mistakenly included {{math|M₆₇}} and {{math|M₂₅₇}} (which are composite) and omitted {{math|M₆₁}}, {{math|M₈₉}}, and {{math|M₁₀₇}} (which are prime). Mersenne gave little indication of how he came up with his list.The Prime Pages, [http://primes.utm.edu/glossary/page.php?sort=MersennesConjecture Mersenne's conjecture].

Édouard Lucas proved in 1876 that {{math|M₁₂₇}} is indeed prime, as Mersenne claimed. This was the largest known prime number for 75 years until 1951, when Aimé Ferrier found a larger prime, $(2^\{148\}+1)/17$, using a desk calculating machine.{{cite book |first1 = G. H. |last1 = Hardy |first2 = E. M. |last2 = Wright |author-link1 = G. H. Hardy |author-link2 = E. M. Wright |title=An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers |year = 1959 |edition=4th |publisher=Oxford University Press}}{{rp|page 22}} {{math|M₆₁}} was determined to be prime in 1883 by Ivan Mikheevich Pervushin, though Mersenne claimed it was composite, and for this reason it is sometimes called Pervushin's number{{cn|date=January 2025}}. This was the second-largest known prime number, and it remained so until 1911. Lucas had shown another error in Mersenne's list in 1876 by demonstrating that {{math|M₆₇}} was composite without finding a factor. No factor was found until a famous talk by Frank Nelson Cole in 1903.{{cite journal |last1=Cole |first1=F. N. |title=On the factoring of large numbers |journal=Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society |date=1 December 1903 |volume=10 |issue=3 |pages=134–138 |doi=10.1090/S0002-9904-1903-01079-9 |doi-access=free }} Without speaking a word, he went to a blackboard and raised 2 to the 67th power, then subtracted one, resulting in the number {{nowrap|147,573,952,589,676,412,927}}. On the other side of the board, he multiplied {{nowrap|193,707,721 × 761,838,257,287}} and got the same number, then returned to his seat (to applause) without speaking.{{cite book

| title = Mathematics, queen and servant of science

| url = https://archive.org/details/mathematicsqueen0000bell_n9l1

| url-access = registration

| author = Bell, E.T. and Mathematical Association of America

| year = 1951

| publisher = McGraw-Hill New York}} p. 228. He later said that the result had taken him "three years of Sundays" to find.{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/dna/place-lancashire/plain/A670051 |title=h2g2: Mersenne Numbers |work=BBC News |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141205081512/http://news.bbc.co.uk/dna/place-lancashire/plain/A670051 |archive-date=December 5, 2014 }} A correct list of all Mersenne primes in this number range was completed and rigorously verified only about three centuries after Mersenne published his list.

Fast algorithms for finding Mersenne primes are available, and {{as of|2024|10|lc=y}}, the seven largest known prime numbers are Mersenne primes.

The first four Mersenne primes {{math|M₂ {{=}} 3}}, {{math|M₃ {{=}} 7}}, {{math|M₅ {{=}} 31}} and {{math|M₇ {{=}} 127}} were known in antiquity. The fifth, {{math|M₁₃ {{=}} 8191}}, was discovered anonymously before 1461; the next two ({{math|M₁₇}} and {{math|M₁₉}}) were found by Pietro Cataldi in 1588. After nearly two centuries, {{math|M₃₁}} was verified to be prime by Leonhard Euler in 1772. The next (in historical, not numerical order) was {{math|M₁₂₇}}, found by Édouard Lucas in 1876, then {{math|M₆₁}} by Ivan Mikheevich Pervushin in 1883. Two more ({{math|M₈₉}} and {{math|M₁₀₇}}) were found early in the 20th century, by R. E. Powers in 1911 and 1914, respectively.

The most efficient method presently known for testing the primality of Mersenne numbers is the Lucas–Lehmer primality test. Specifically, it can be shown that for prime {{math|p > 2}}, {{math|M_p {{=}} 2^p − 1}} is prime if and only if {{math|M_p}} divides {{math|S_{p − 2}}}, where {{math|S₀ {{=}} 4}} and {{math|S_k {{=}} (S_{k − 1})² − 2}} for {{math|k > 0}}.

During the era of manual calculation, all previously untested exponents up to and including 257 were tested with the Lucas–Lehmer test and found to be composite. A notable contribution was made by retired Yale physics professor Horace Scudder Uhler, who did the calculations for exponents 157, 167, 193, 199, 227, and 229.{{cite journal |journal=Scripta Mathematica |volume= 18 |year=1952 |pages=122–131 |title=A Brief History of the Investigations on Mersenne Numbers and the Latest Immense Primes |author=Horace S. Uhler |url=https://primes.utm.edu/mersenne/LukeMirror/lit/lit_019.htm}} Unfortunately for those investigators, the interval they were testing contains the largest known relative gap between Mersenne primes: the next Mersenne prime exponent, 521, would turn out to be more than four times as large as the previous record of 127.

File:Digits in largest prime found as a function of time.svg

The search for Mersenne primes was revolutionized by the introduction of the electronic digital computer. Alan Turing searched for them on the Manchester Mark 1 in 1949,Brian Napper, [http://www.computer50.org/mark1/maths.html The Mathematics Department and the Mark 1]. but the first successful identification of a Mersenne prime, {{math|M₅₂₁}}, by this means was achieved at 10:00 pm on January 30, 1952, using the U.S. National Bureau of Standards Western Automatic Computer (SWAC) at the Institute for Numerical Analysis at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), under the direction of D. H. Lehmer, with a computer search program written and run by Prof. R. M. Robinson. It was the first Mersenne prime to be identified in thirty-eight years; the next one, {{math|M₆₀₇}}, was found by the computer a little less than two hours later. Three more — {{math|M₁₂₇₉}}, {{math|M₂₂₀₃}}, and {{math|M₂₂₈₁}} — were found by the same program in the next several months. {{math|M_4,423}} was the first prime discovered with more than 1000 digits, {{math|M_44,497}} was the first with more than 10,000, and {{math|M_6,972,593}} was the first with more than a million. In general, the number of digits in the decimal representation of {{math|M_n}} equals {{math|⌊n × log₁₀2⌋ + 1}}, where {{math|⌊x⌋}} denotes the floor function (or equivalently {{math|⌊log₁₀M_n⌋ + 1}}).

In September 2008, mathematicians at UCLA participating in the Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search (GIMPS) won part of a $100,000 prize from the Electronic Frontier Foundation for their discovery of a very nearly 13-million-digit Mersenne prime. The prize, finally confirmed in October 2009, is for the first known prime with at least 10 million digits. The prime was found on a Dell OptiPlex 745 on August 23, 2008. This was the eighth Mersenne prime discovered at UCLA.{{cite news|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-prime27-2008sep27,0,2746766.story |title=UCLA mathematicians discover a 13-million-digit prime number|newspaper=Los Angeles Times|date=2008-09-27 |access-date=2011-05-21|first=Thomas H.|last=Maugh II}}

On April 12, 2009, a GIMPS server log reported that a 47th Mersenne prime had possibly been found. The find was first noticed on June 4, 2009, and verified a week later. The prime is {{nowrap|2^42,643,801 − 1}}. Although it is chronologically the 47th Mersenne prime to be discovered, it is smaller than the largest known at the time, which was the 45th to be discovered.

On January 25, 2013, Curtis Cooper, a mathematician at the University of Central Missouri, discovered a 48th Mersenne prime, {{nowrap|2^57,885,161 − 1}} (a number with 17,425,170 digits), as a result of a search executed by a GIMPS server network.{{cite magazine| url=http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=largest-prime-number-disc |title=Largest Prime Number Discovered |author=Tia Ghose |magazine=Scientific American |access-date=2013-02-07}}

On January 19, 2016, Cooper published his discovery of a 49th Mersenne prime, {{nowrap|2^74,207,281 − 1}} (a number with 22,338,618 digits), as a result of a search executed by a GIMPS server network.{{cite web |last=Cooper |first=Curtis |title=Mersenne Prime Number discovery – 2^74207281 − 1 is Prime! |url=http://www.mersenne.org/primes/?press=M74207281 |date=7 January 2016 |work=Mersenne Research, Inc. |access-date=22 January 2016 }}{{cite news|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/2073909-prime-number-with-22-million-digits-is-the-biggest-ever-found/|title=Prime number with 22 million digits is the biggest ever found|last=Brook|first=Robert|date=January 19, 2016|work=New Scientist|access-date=19 January 2016}}{{cite news |last=Chang |first=Kenneth |title=New Biggest Prime Number = 2 to the 74 Mil ... Uh, It's Big |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/22/science/new-biggest-prime-number-mersenne-primes.html |date=21 January 2016 |work=The New York Times |access-date=22 January 2016 }} This was the fourth Mersenne prime discovered by Cooper and his team in the past ten years.

On September 2, 2016, the Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search finished verifying all tests below {{math|M_37,156,667}}, thus officially confirming its position as the 45th Mersenne prime.{{cite web|url = http://www.mersenne.org/report_milestones/|title = Milestones|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160903040753/http://www.mersenne.org/report_milestones/|archive-date = 2016-09-03}}

On January 3, 2018, it was announced that Jonathan Pace, a 51-year-old electrical engineer living in Germantown, Tennessee, had found a 50th Mersenne prime, {{nowrap|2^77,232,917 − 1}} (a number with 23,249,425 digits), as a result of a search executed by a GIMPS server network.{{Cite web|url=https://www.mersenne.org/primes/?press=M77232917|title=Mersenne Prime Discovery - 2^77232917-1 is Prime!|website=www.mersenne.org|language=en|access-date=2018-01-03}} The discovery was made by a computer in the offices of a church in the same town.{{cite web|url=https://christianchronicle.org/largest-known-prime-number-found-church-computer/|title=Largest-known prime number found on church computer|website=christianchronicle.org|date=January 12, 2018}}{{cite web|url=https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/found-special-mind-bogglingly-large-prime-number-mersenne|title=Found: A Special, Mind-Bogglingly Large Prime Number|date=January 5, 2018}}

On December 21, 2018, it was announced that The Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search (GIMPS) discovered a new prime number, {{nowrap|2^82,589,933 − 1}}, having 24,862,048 digits. A computer volunteered by Patrick Laroche from Ocala, Florida made the find on December 7, 2018.{{Cite web|url=https://www.mersenne.org/primes/?press=M82589933|title=GIMPS Discovers Largest Known Prime Number: 2^82,589,933-1|language=en|access-date=2019-01-01}}

In late 2020, GIMPS began using a new technique to rule out potential Mersenne primes called the Probable prime (PRP) test, based on development from Robert Gerbicz in 2017, and a simple way to verify tests developed by Krzysztof Pietrzak in 2018. Due to the low error rate and ease of proof, this nearly halved the computing time to rule out potential primes over the Lucas-Lehmer test (as two users would no longer have to perform the same test to confirm the other's result), although exponents passing the PRP test still require one to confirm their primality.{{cite web |title=GIMPS - The Math - PrimeNet |url=https://www.mersenne.org/various/math.php |website=www.mersenne.org |access-date=29 June 2021}}

On October 12, 2024, a user named Luke Durant from San Jose, California, found the current largest known Mersenne prime, {{nowrap|2^136,279,841 − 1}}, having 41,024,320 digits. This marks the first Mersenne prime with an exponent surpassing 8 digits. This was announced on October 21, 2024.{{cite web |title=Mersenne Prime Number discovery - 2136279841-1 is Prime! |url=https://www.mersenne.org/primes/?press=M136279841 |website=www.mersenne.org |access-date=21 Oct 2024}}

Mersenne numbers are 0, 1, 3, 7, 15, 31, 63, ... {{OEIS|id=A000225}}.

1. If {{math|a}} and {{mvar|p}} are natural numbers such that {{math|a^p − 1}} is prime, then {{math|a {{=}} 2}} or {{math|p {{=}} 1}}.
2. * Proof: {{math|a ≡ 1 (mod a − 1)}}. Then {{math|a^p ≡ 1 (mod a − 1)}}, so {{math|a^p − 1 ≡ 0 (mod a − 1)}}. Thus {{math|a − 1 {{!}} a^p − 1}}. However, {{math|a^p − 1}} is prime, so {{math|a − 1 {{=}} a^p − 1}} or {{math|a − 1 {{=}} ±1}}. In the former case, {{math|a {{=}} a^p}}, hence {{math|a {{=}} 0, 1}} (which is a contradiction, as neither −1 nor 0 is prime) or {{math|p {{=}} 1.}} In the latter case, {{math|a {{=}} 2}} or {{math|a {{=}} 0}}. If {{math|a {{=}} 0}}, however, {{math|0^p − 1 {{=}} 0 − 1 {{=}} −1}} which is not prime. Therefore, {{math|a {{=}} 2}}.
3. If {{math|2^p − 1}} is prime, then {{mvar|p}} is prime.
4. * Proof: Suppose that {{mvar|p}} is composite, hence can be written {{math|p {{=}} ab}} with {{mvar|a}} and {{math|b > 1}}. Then {{math|2^p − 1}} {{math|{{=}} 2^ab − 1}} {{math|{{=}} (2^a)^b − 1}} {{math|{{=}} (2^a − 1)((2^a)^b−1 + (2^a)^b−2 + ... + 2^a + 1)}} so {{math|2^p − 1}} is composite. By contraposition, if {{math|2^p − 1}} is prime then p is prime.
5. If {{mvar|p}} is an odd prime, then every prime {{mvar|q}} that divides {{math|2^p − 1}} must be 1 plus a multiple of {{math|2p}}. This holds even when {{math|2^p − 1}} is prime.
6. * For example, {{nowrap|2⁵ − 1 {{=}} 31}} is prime, and {{nowrap|31 {{=}} 1 + 3 × (2 × 5)}}. A composite example is {{nowrap|2¹¹ − 1 {{=}} 23 × 89}}, where {{nowrap|23 {{=}} 1 + (2 × 11)}} and {{nowrap|89 {{=}} 1 + 4 × (2 × 11)}}.
7. * Proof: By Fermat's little theorem, {{mvar|q}} is a factor of {{math|2^q−1 − 1}}. Since {{mvar|q}} is a factor of {{math|2^p − 1}}, for all positive integers {{math|c}}, {{mvar|q}} is also a factor of {{math|2^pc − 1}}. Since {{mvar|p}} is prime and {{mvar|q}} is not a factor of {{nowrap|2¹ − 1}}, {{mvar|p}} is also the smallest positive integer {{mvar|x}} such that {{mvar|q}} is a factor of {{math|2^x − 1}}. As a result, for all positive integers {{mvar|x}}, {{mvar|q}} is a factor of {{math|2^x − 1}} if and only if {{mvar|p}} is a factor of {{mvar|x}}. Therefore, since {{mvar|q}} is a factor of {{math|2^q−1 − 1}}, {{mvar|p}} is a factor of {{math|q − 1}} so {{math|q ≡ 1 (mod p)}}. Furthermore, since {{mvar|q}} is a factor of {{math|2^p − 1}}, which is odd, {{mvar|q}} is odd. Therefore, {{math|q ≡ 1 (mod 2p)}}.
8. * This fact leads to a proof of Euclid's theorem, which asserts the infinitude of primes, distinct from the proof written by Euclid: for every odd prime {{mvar|p}}, all primes dividing {{math|2^p − 1}} are larger than {{mvar|p}}; thus there are always larger primes than any particular prime.
9. * It follows from this fact that for every prime {{math|p > 2}}, there is at least one prime of the form {{math|2kp+1}} less than or equal to {{mvar|M_p}}, for some integer {{mvar|k}}.
10. If {{mvar|p}} is an odd prime, then every prime {{mvar|q}} that divides {{math|2^p − 1}} is congruent to {{nowrap|±1 (mod 8)}}.
11. * Proof: {{math|2^p+1 ≡ 2 (mod q)}}, so {{math|2^{{{sfrac|1|2}}(p+1)}}} is a square root of {{math|2 mod q}}. By quadratic reciprocity, every prime modulus in which the number 2 has a square root is congruent to {{nowrap|±1 (mod 8)}}.
12. A Mersenne prime cannot be a Wieferich prime.
13. * Proof: We show if {{math|p {{=}} 2^m − 1}} is a Mersenne prime, then the congruence {{math|2^p−1 ≡ 1 (mod p²)}} does not hold. By Fermat's little theorem, {{math|m {{!}} p − 1}}. Therefore, one can write {{math|p − 1 {{=}} mλ}}. If the given congruence is satisfied, then {{math|p² {{!}} 2^mλ − 1}}, therefore {{math|0 ≡ {{sfrac|2^mλ − 1|2^m − 1}}}} {{math|{{=}} 1 + 2^m + 2^2m + ... + 2^{(λ − 1)m}}} {{math|≡ λ mod (2^m − 1)}}. Hence {{math|p {{!}} λ}}, and therefore {{math|1=−1 = 0 (mod p)}} which is impossible.
14. If {{mvar|m}} and {{mvar|n}} are natural numbers then {{mvar|m}} and {{mvar|n}} are coprime if and only if {{math|2^m − 1}} and {{math|2ⁿ − 1}} are coprime. Consequently, a prime number divides at most one prime-exponent Mersenne number.[http://www.garlic.com/~wedgingt/mersenne.html Will Edgington's Mersenne Page] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141014102940/http://www.garlic.com/~wedgingt/mersenne.html |date=2014-10-14 }} That is, the set of pernicious Mersenne numbers is pairwise coprime.
15. If {{mvar|p}} and {{math|2p + 1}} are both prime (meaning that {{mvar|p}} is a Sophie Germain prime), and {{mvar|p}} is congruent to {{nowrap|3 (mod 4)}}, then {{math|2p + 1}} divides {{math|2^p − 1}}.{{cite web|url=http://primes.utm.edu/notes/proofs/MerDiv2.html|title=Proof of a result of Euler and Lagrange on Mersenne Divisors|first=Chris K.|last=Caldwell|work=Prime Pages}}
16. * Example: 11 and 23 are both prime, and {{nowrap|11 {{=}} 2 × 4 + 3}}, so 23 divides {{nowrap|2¹¹ − 1}}.
17. * Proof: Let {{mvar|q}} be {{math|2p + 1}}. By Fermat's little theorem, {{math|2^2p ≡ 1 (mod q)}}, so either {{math|2^p ≡ 1 (mod q)}} or {{math|2^p ≡ −1 (mod q)}}. Supposing latter true, then {{math|2^p+1 {{=}} (2^{{{sfrac|1|2}}(p + 1)})² ≡ −2 (mod q)}}, so −2 would be a quadratic residue mod {{mvar|q}}. However, since {{mvar|p}} is congruent to {{nowrap|3 (mod 4)}}, {{mvar|q}} is congruent to {{nowrap|7 (mod 8)}} and therefore 2 is a quadratic residue mod {{mvar|q}}. Also since {{mvar|q}} is congruent to {{nowrap|3 (mod 4)}}, −1 is a quadratic nonresidue mod {{mvar|q}}, so −2 is the product of a residue and a nonresidue and hence it is a nonresidue, which is a contradiction. Hence, the former congruence must be true and {{math|2p + 1}} divides {{mvar|M_p}}.
18. All composite divisors of prime-exponent Mersenne numbers are strong pseudoprimes to the base 2.
19. With the exception of 1, a Mersenne number cannot be a perfect power. That is, and in accordance with Mihăilescu's theorem, the equation {{math|2^m − 1 {{=}} n^k}} has no solutions where {{mvar|m}}, {{mvar|n}}, and {{mvar|k}} are integers with {{math|m > 1}} and {{math|k > 1}}.
20. The Mersenne number sequence is a member of the family of Lucas sequences. It is {{math|U_n}}(3, 2). That is, Mersenne number {{math|m_n {{=}} 3m_n−1 − 2m_n−2}} with {{math|m₀ {{=}} 0}} and {{math|m₁ {{=}} 1}}.

{{main|List of Mersenne primes and perfect numbers}}

{{As of|2024}}, the 52 known Mersenne primes are 2^p − 1 for the following p:

:2, 3, 5, 7, 13, 17, 19, 31, 61, 89, 107, 127, 521, 607, 1279, 2203, 2281, 3217, 4253, 4423, 9689, 9941, 11213, 19937, 21701, 23209, 44497, 86243, 110503, 132049, 216091, 756839, 859433, 1257787, 1398269, 2976221, 3021377, 6972593, 13466917, 20996011, 24036583, 25964951, 30402457, 32582657, 37156667, 42643801, 43112609, 57885161, 74207281, 77232917, 82589933, 136279841. {{OEIS|id=A000043}}

Since they are prime numbers, Mersenne primes are divisible only by 1 and themselves. However, not all Mersenne numbers are Mersenne primes. Mersenne numbers are very good test cases for the special number field sieve algorithm, so often the largest number factorized with this algorithm has been a Mersenne number. {{As of|2019|6}}, {{math|2{{sup|1,193}} − 1}} is the record-holder,{{cite book |doi=10.1007/978-3-662-45611-8_19 |chapter=Mersenne Factorization Factory |title=Advances in Cryptology – ASIACRYPT 2014 |series=Lecture Notes in Computer Science |year=2014 |last1=Kleinjung |first1=Thorsten |last2=Bos |first2=Joppe W. |last3=Lenstra |first3=Arjen K. |volume=8874 |pages=358–377 |isbn=978-3-662-45607-1 }} having been factored with a variant of the special number field sieve that allows the factorization of several numbers at once. See integer factorization records for links to more information. The special number field sieve can factorize numbers with more than one large factor. If a number has only one very large factor then other algorithms can factorize larger numbers by first finding small factors and then running a primality test on the cofactor. {{As of|2022|9}}, the largest completely factored number (with probable prime factors allowed) is {{math|2^12,720,787 − 1 {{=}} 1,119,429,257 × 175,573,124,547,437,977 × 8,480,999,878,421,106,991 × {{mvar|q}}}}, where {{mvar|q}} is a 3,829,294-digit probable prime. It was discovered by a GIMPS participant with nickname "Funky Waddle".{{cite web|url=http://www.primenumbers.net/prptop/searchform.php?form=(2^p-1)/%3F&action=Search |title=PRP Top Records |author=Henri Lifchitz and Renaud Lifchitz |access-date=2022-09-05}}{{cite web |title=M12720787 Mersenne number exponent details |url=https://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/12720787 |website=www.mersenne.ca |access-date=5 September 2022}} {{As of|2022|9}}, the Mersenne number M₁₂₇₇ is the smallest composite Mersenne number with no known factors; it has no prime factors below 2⁶⁸,{{cite web|url=https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=1277&full=1| title = Exponent Status for M1277|access-date=2021-07-21}} and is very unlikely to have any factors below 10⁶⁵ (~2²¹⁶).{{cite web |title=M1277 Mersenne number exponent details |url=https://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/1277 |website=www.mersenne.ca |access-date=24 June 2022}}

The table below shows factorizations for the first 20 composite Mersenne numbers where the exponent {{math|p}} is a prime number.({{OEIS|id=A244453}})

The number of factors for the first 500 Mersenne numbers can be found at {{OEIS|id=A046800}}.

In the mathematical problem Tower of Hanoi, solving a puzzle with an {{math|n}}-disc tower requires {{math|M_n}} steps, assuming no mistakes are made.{{cite book|last=Petković|first=Miodrag|title=Famous Puzzles of Great Mathematicians|year=2009|publisher=AMS Bookstore|isbn=978-0-8218-4814-2|pages=197}} The number of rice grains on the whole chessboard in the wheat and chessboard problem is {{math|M₆₄}}.{{Cite web |last=Weisstein |first=Eric W. |title=Wheat and Chessboard Problem |url=https://mathworld.wolfram.com/ |access-date=2023-02-11 |website=Mathworld. Wolfram |language=en}}

The asteroid with minor planet number 8191 is named 8191 Mersenne after Marin Mersenne, because 8191 is a Mersenne prime.{{cite web|author=Alan Chamberlin |url=http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=8191+Mersenne |title=JPL Small-Body Database Browser |publisher=Ssd.jpl.nasa.gov |access-date=2011-05-21}}

In geometry, an integer right triangle that is primitive and has its even leg a power of 2 ( {{math|≥ 4}} ) generates a unique right triangle such that its inradius is always a Mersenne number. For example, if the even leg is {{math|2^n + 1}} then because it is primitive it constrains the odd leg to be {{math|4ⁿ − 1}}, the hypotenuse to be {{math|4ⁿ + 1}} and its inradius to be {{math|2ⁿ − 1}}.{{cite web |url=http://oeis.org/A016131 |title=OEIS A016131 |publisher=The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences}}

A Mersenne–Fermat number is defined as {{math|{{sfrac|2^pr − 1|2^{pr − 1} − 1}}}} with {{math|p}} prime, {{math|r}} natural number, and can be written as {{math|MF(p, r)}}. When {{math|r {{=}} 1}}, it is a Mersenne number. When {{math|p {{=}} 2}}, it is a Fermat number. The only known Mersenne–Fermat primes with {{math|r > 1}} are

:{{math|MF(2, 2), MF(2, 3), MF(2, 4), MF(2, 5), MF(3, 2), MF(3, 3), MF(7, 2),}} and {{math|MF(59, 2)}}.{{cite web|url=http://staff.spd.dcu.ie/johnbcos/fermat6.htm|title=A research of Mersenne and Fermat primes|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120529014233/http://staff.spd.dcu.ie/johnbcos/fermat6.htm|archive-date=2012-05-29}}

In fact, {{math|MF(p, r) {{=}} Φ_p^r(2)}}, where {{math|Φ}} is the cyclotomic polynomial.

{{main|Generalized Mersenne prime}}

The simplest generalized Mersenne primes are prime numbers of the form {{math|f(2ⁿ)}}, where {{math|f(x)}} is a low-degree polynomial with small integer coefficients.{{cite book|title=Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security|first=Jerome A.|last=Solinas|editor-first1=Henk C. A. van|editor-last1=Tilborg|editor-first2=Sushil|editor-last2=Jajodia|date=1 January 2011|publisher=Springer US|pages=509–510|doi=10.1007/978-1-4419-5906-5_32|chapter = Generalized Mersenne Prime|isbn = 978-1-4419-5905-8}} An example is {{math|2⁶⁴ − 2³² + 1}}, in this case, {{math|n {{=}} 32}}, and {{math|f(x) {{=}} x² − x + 1}}; another example is {{math|2¹⁹² − 2⁶⁴ − 1}}, in this case, {{math|n {{=}} 64}}, and {{math|f(x) {{=}} x³ − x − 1}}.

It is also natural to try to generalize primes of the form {{math|2ⁿ − 1}} to primes of the form {{math|bⁿ − 1}} (for {{math|b ≠ 2}} and {{math|n > 1}}). However (see also theorems above), {{math|bⁿ − 1}} is always divisible by {{math|b − 1}}, so unless the latter is a unit, the former is not a prime. This can be remedied by allowing b to be an algebraic integer instead of an integer:

In the ring of integers (on real numbers), if {{math|b − 1}} is a unit, then {{math|b}} is either 2 or 0. But {{math|2ⁿ − 1}} are the usual Mersenne primes, and the formula {{math|0ⁿ − 1}} does not lead to anything interesting (since it is always −1 for all {{math|n > 0}}). Thus, we can regard a ring of "integers" on complex numbers instead of real numbers, like Gaussian integers and Eisenstein integers.

If we regard the ring of Gaussian integers, we get the case {{math|b {{=}} 1 + i}} and {{math|b {{=}} 1 − i}}, and can ask (WLOG) for which {{math|n}} the number {{math|(1 + i)ⁿ − 1}} is a Gaussian prime which will then be called a Gaussian Mersenne prime.Chris Caldwell: [http://primes.utm.edu/glossary/xpage/GaussianMersenne.html The Prime Glossary: Gaussian Mersenne] (part of the Prime Pages)

{{math|(1 + i)ⁿ − 1}} is a Gaussian prime for the following {{math|n}}:

:2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 19, 29, 47, 73, 79, 113, 151, 157, 163, 167, 239, 241, 283, 353, 367, 379, 457, 997, 1367, 3041, 10141, 14699, 27529, 49207, 77291, 85237, 106693, 160423, 203789, 364289, 991961, 1203793, 1667321, 3704053, 4792057, ... {{OEIS|id=A057429}}

Like the sequence of exponents for usual Mersenne primes, this sequence contains only (rational) prime numbers.

As for all Gaussian primes, the norms (that is, squares of absolute values) of these numbers are rational primes:

:5, 13, 41, 113, 2113, 525313, 536903681, 140737471578113, ... {{OEIS|id=A182300}}.

One may encounter cases where such a Mersenne prime is also an Eisenstein prime, being of the form {{math|b {{=}} 1 + ω}} and {{math|b {{=}} 1 − ω}}. In these cases, such numbers are called Eisenstein Mersenne primes.

{{math|(1 + ω)ⁿ − 1}} is an Eisenstein prime for the following {{math|n}}:

:2, 5, 7, 11, 17, 19, 79, 163, 193, 239, 317, 353, 659, 709, 1049, 1103, 1759, 2029, 5153, 7541, 9049, 10453, 23743, 255361, 534827, 2237561, ... {{OEIS|id=A066408}}

The norms (that is, squares of absolute values) of these Eisenstein primes are rational primes:

:7, 271, 2269, 176419, 129159847, 1162320517, ... {{OEIS|id=A066413}}

{{main|Repunit}}

The other way to deal with the fact that {{math|bⁿ − 1}} is always divisible by {{math|b − 1}}, it is to simply take out this factor and ask which values of {{math|n}} make

:$\backslash frac\{b^n-1\}\{b-1\}$

be prime. (The integer {{math|b}} can be either positive or negative.) If, for example, we take {{math|b {{=}} 10}}, we get {{math|n}} values of:

:2, 19, 23, 317, 1031, 49081, 86453, 109297, 270343, ... {{OEIS|id=A004023}},
corresponding to primes 11, 1111111111111111111, 11111111111111111111111, ... {{OEIS|id=A004022}}.

These primes are called repunit primes. Another example is when we take {{math|b {{=}} −12}}, we get {{math|n}} values of:

:2, 5, 11, 109, 193, 1483, 11353, 21419, 21911, 24071, 106859, 139739, ... {{OEIS|id=A057178}},
corresponding to primes −11, 19141, 57154490053, ....

It is a conjecture that for every integer {{math|b}} which is not a perfect power, there are infinitely many values of {{math|n}} such that {{math|{{sfrac|bⁿ − 1|b − 1}}}} is prime. (When {{math|b}} is a perfect power, it can be shown that there is at most one {{math|n}} value such that {{math|{{sfrac|bⁿ − 1|b − 1}}}} is prime)

Least {{math|n}} such that {{math|{{sfrac|bⁿ − 1|b − 1}}}} is prime are (starting with {{math|b {{=}} 2}}, {{math|0}} if no such {{math|n}} exists)

:2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 5, 3, 0, 2, 17, 2, 5, 3, 3, 2, 3, 2, 19, 3, 3, 2, 5, 3, 0, 7, 3, 2, 5, 2, 7, 0, 3, 13, 313, 2, 13, 3, 349, 2, 3, 2, 5, 5, 19, 2, 127, 19, 0, 3, 4229, 2, 11, 3, 17, 7, 3, 2, 3, 2, 7, 3, 5, 0, 19, 2, 19, 5, 3, 2, 3, 2, ... {{OEIS|id=A084740}}

For negative bases {{math|b}}, they are (starting with {{math|b {{=}} −2}}, {{math|0}} if no such {{math|n}} exists)

:3, 2, 2, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 5, 5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 3, 7, 2, 17, 2, 3, 3, 11, 2, 3, 11, 0, 3, 7, 2, 109, 2, 5, 3, 11, 31, 5, 2, 3, 53, 17, 2, 5, 2, 103, 7, 5, 2, 7, 1153, 3, 7, 21943, 2, 3, 37, 53, 3, 17, 2, 7, 2, 3, 0, 19, 7, 3, 2, 11, 3, 5, 2, ... {{OEIS|id=A084742}} (notice this OEIS sequence does not allow {{math|n {{=}} 2}})

Least base {{math|b}} such that {{math|{{sfrac|b^prime(n) − 1|b − 1}}}} is prime are

:2, 2, 2, 2, 5, 2, 2, 2, 10, 6, 2, 61, 14, 15, 5, 24, 19, 2, 46, 3, 11, 22, 41, 2, 12, 22, 3, 2, 12, 86, 2, 7, 13, 11, 5, 29, 56, 30, 44, 60, 304, 5, 74, 118, 33, 156, 46, 183, 72, 606, 602, 223, 115, 37, 52, 104, 41, 6, 338, 217, ... {{OEIS|id=A066180}}

For negative bases {{math|b}}, they are

:3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 7, 2, 16, 61, 2, 6, 10, 6, 2, 5, 46, 18, 2, 49, 16, 70, 2, 5, 6, 12, 92, 2, 48, 89, 30, 16, 147, 19, 19, 2, 16, 11, 289, 2, 12, 52, 2, 66, 9, 22, 5, 489, 69, 137, 16, 36, 96, 76, 117, 26, 3, ... {{OEIS|id=A103795}}

Another generalized Mersenne number is

:$\backslash frac\{a^n-b^n\}\{a-b\}$

with {{mvar|a}}, {{mvar|b}} any coprime integers, {{math|a > 1}} and {{math|−a < b < a}}. (Since {{math|aⁿ − bⁿ}} is always divisible by {{math|a − b}}, the division is necessary for there to be any chance of finding prime numbers.){{efn|This number is the same as the Lucas number {{math|U_n(a + b, ab)}}, since {{mvar|a}} and {{mvar|b}} are the roots of the quadratic equation {{math|x² − (a + b)x + ab {{=}} 0}}.}} We can ask which {{mvar|n}} makes this number prime. It can be shown that such {{mvar|n}} must be primes themselves or equal to 4, and {{mvar|n}} can be 4 if and only if {{math|a + b {{=}} 1}} and {{math|a² + b²}} is prime.{{efn|Since {{math|{{sfrac|a⁴ − b⁴|a − b}} {{=}} (a + b)(a² + b²)}}. Thus, in this case the pair {{math|(a, b)}} must be {{math|(x + 1, −x)}} and {{math|x² + (x + 1)²}} must be prime. That is, {{mvar|x}} must be in {{oeis|id=A027861}}.}} It is a conjecture that for any pair {{math|(a, b)}} such that {{mvar|a}} and {{mvar|b}} are not both perfect {{mvar|r}}th powers for any {{mvar|r}} and {{math|−4ab}} is not a perfect fourth power, there are infinitely many values of {{mvar|n}} such that {{math|{{sfrac|aⁿ − bⁿ|a − b}}}} is prime.{{efn|When {{mvar|a}} and {{mvar|b}} are both perfect {{mvar|r}}th powers for some {{math|r > 1}} or when {{math|−4ab}} is a perfect fourth power, it can be shown that there are at most two values of {{mvar|n}} with this property: in these cases, {{math|{{sfrac|aⁿ − bⁿ|a − b}}}} can be factored algebraically.{{cn|date=March 2022}}}} However, this has not been proved for any single value of {{math|(a, b)}}.

^*Note: if {{math|b < 0}} and {{mvar|n}} is even, then the numbers {{mvar|n}} are not included in the corresponding OEIS sequence.

When {{math|a {{=}} b + 1}}, it is {{math|(b + 1){{sup|n}} − b{{sup|n}}}}, a difference of two consecutive perfect {{mvar|n}}th powers, and if {{math|aⁿ − bⁿ}} is prime, then {{mvar|a}} must be {{math|b + 1}}, because it is divisible by {{math|a − b}}.

Least {{mvar|n}} such that {{math|(b + 1){{sup|n}} − b{{sup|n}}}} is prime are

:2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 2, 7, 2, 2, 3, 2, 17, 3, 2, 2, 5, 3, 2, 5, 2, 2, 229, 2, 3, 3, 2, 3, 3, 2, 2, 5, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 3, 3, 2, 7, 2, 3, 37, 2, 3, 5, 58543, 2, 3, 2, 2, 3, 2, 2, 3, 2, 5, 3, 4663, 54517, 17, 3, 2, 5, 2, 3, 3, 2, 2, 47, 61, 19, ... {{OEIS|id=A058013}}

Least {{mvar|b}} such that {{math|(b + 1){{sup|prime(n)}} − b{{sup|prime(n)}}}} is prime are

:1, 1, 1, 1, 5, 1, 1, 1, 5, 2, 1, 39, 6, 4, 12, 2, 2, 1, 6, 17, 46, 7, 5, 1, 25, 2, 41, 1, 12, 7, 1, 7, 327, 7, 8, 44, 26, 12, 75, 14, 51, 110, 4, 14, 49, 286, 15, 4, 39, 22, 109, 367, 22, 67, 27, 95, 80, 149, 2, 142, 3, 11, ... {{OEIS|id=A222119}}

{{cols|colwidth=18em}}

• Repunit
• Fermat number
• Power of two
• Erdős–Borwein constant
• Mersenne conjectures
• Mersenne twister
• Double Mersenne number
• Prime95 / MPrime
• Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search (GIMPS)
• Largest known prime number
• Wieferich prime
• Wagstaff prime
• Cullen prime
• Woodall prime
• Proth prime
• Solinas prime
• Gillies' conjecture
• Williams number

{{colend}}

{{Notelist}}

{{Reflist|30em}}

{{Wiktionary|Mersenne prime}}

• {{springer|title=Mersenne number|id=p/m063480}}
• [http://www.mersenne.org GIMPS home page]
• [https://www.mersenne.org/report_milestones/ GIMPS Milestones Report] – status page gives various statistics on search progress, typically updated every week, including progress towards proving the ordering of the largest known Mersenne primes
• [http://www.mersenne.org/report_factors/ GIMPS, known factors of Mersenne numbers]
• {{math|M_q {{=}} (8x)² − (3qy)²}} [http://tony.reix.free.fr/Mersenne/Mersenne8x3qy.pdf Property of Mersenne numbers with prime exponent that are composite] (PDF)
• {{math|M_q {{=}} x² + d·y²}} [https://web.archive.org/web/20050221194456/http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/scripties/jansen.ps math thesis] (PS)
• {{cite web|last=Grime|first=James|title=31 and Mersenne Primes|url=http://www.numberphile.com/videos/31.html|work=Numberphile|publisher=Brady Haran|access-date=2013-04-06|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130531091712/http://numberphile.com/videos/31.html|archive-date=2013-05-31|url-status=dead}}
• [http://www.utm.edu/research/primes/mersenne/LukeMirror/biblio.htm Mersenne prime bibliography] with hyperlinks to original publications
• [http://www.taz.de/pt/2005/03/11/a0355.nf/text report about Mersenne primes] – detection in detail {{in lang|de}}
• [https://web.archive.org/web/20061205062803/http://mersennewiki.org/index.php/Main_Page GIMPS wiki]
• [https://web.archive.org/web/20141014102940/http://www.garlic.com/~wedgingt/mersenne.html Will Edgington's Mersenne Page] – contains factors for small Mersenne numbers
• [http://www.mersenne.org/report_factors/ Known factors of Mersenne numbers]
• [http://www.isthe.com/chongo/tech/math/prime/mersenne.html Decimal digits and English names of Mersenne primes]
• [http://primes.utm.edu/curios/page.php/2305843009213693951.html Prime curios: 2305843009213693951]
• http://www.leyland.vispa.com/numth/factorization/cunningham/2-.txt {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141105173948/http://www.leyland.vispa.com/numth/factorization/cunningham/2-.txt |date=2014-11-05 }}
• http://www.leyland.vispa.com/numth/factorization/cunningham/2+.txt {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130502023640/http://www.leyland.vispa.com/numth/factorization/cunningham/2+.txt |date=2013-05-02 }}
• {{OEIS el|1=A250197|2=Numbers n such that the left Aurifeuillian primitive part of 2^n+1 is prime}} – Factorization of Mersenne numbers {{math|M_n}} ({{math|n}} up to 1280)
• [https://web.archive.org/web/20141015022019/http://www.garlic.com/~wedgingt/factoredM.txt Factorization of completely factored Mersenne numbers]
• [https://homes.cerias.purdue.edu/~ssw/cun/index.html The Cunningham project, factorization of {{math|1=bⁿ ± 1, b = 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12}}]
• http://www.leyland.vispa.com/numth/factorization/cunningham/main.htm {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304120336/http://www.leyland.vispa.com/numth/factorization/cunningham/main.htm |date=2016-03-04 }}
• http://www.leyland.vispa.com/numth/factorization/anbn/main.htm {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160202122746/http://www.leyland.vispa.com/numth/factorization/anbn/main.htm |date=2016-02-02 }}

• {{mathworld|urlname=MersenneNumber|title=Mersenne number}}
• {{mathworld|urlname=MersennePrime|title=Mersenne prime}}

{{Prime number classes|state=collapsed}}

{{Classes of natural numbers}}

{{Mersenne}}

{{Large numbers}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Mersenne Prime}}

Category:Articles containing proofs

Category:Classes of prime numbers

Category:Eponymous numbers in mathematics

Category:Unsolved problems in number theory

Category:Integer sequences

Category:Perfect numbers