Peak oil#Concerns over stated reserves

{{Short description|Point in time when the maximum rate of petroleum extraction is reached}}

{{For|Peak brand motor oil|Peak (automotive products)}}

{{Use British English|date=October 2022}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2022}}

File:Hubbert peak oil plot.svg – it had a peak of 12.5 billion barrels per year in about the year 2000. {{As of|2022}}, world oil production was about 29.5 billion barrels per year (80.8 Mbbl/day),{{Cite web |title=International - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) |url=https://www.eia.gov/international/data/world/petroleum-and-other-liquids/annual-petroleum-and-other-liquids-production |access-date=2024-01-25 |website=www.eia.gov}} with an oil glut between 2014 and 2018.]]

File:Hubbert Upper-Bound Peak 1956.png U.S. states production through to 2014 in green]]

Peak oil is the point when global oil production reaches its maximum rate, after which it will begin to decline irreversibly.{{Cite web|title=Peak oil theory|url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/peak-oil-theory|access-date=4 August 2021|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|language=en}}{{Cite web |title=Executive summary – Oil 2023 – Analysis |url=https://www.iea.org/reports/oil-2023/executive-summary |access-date=2024-01-17 |website=IEA |language=en-GB}}{{Cite news |title=Transatlantic resilience brings peak oil within sight |url=https://www.ft.com/content/5b873a69-2e6b-4eff-98e5-9b99073b4705 |access-date=2024-01-17 |newspaper=Financial Times|date=21 December 2023 |last1=Giles |first1=Chris }}{{Request quotation|date=October 2024}} The main concern is that global transportation relies heavily on gasoline and diesel. Adoption of electric vehicles, biofuels, or more efficient transport (like trains and waterways) could help reduce oil demand.{{Cite web |title=Transport biofuels – Renewables 2023 – Analysis |url=https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2023/transport-biofuels |access-date=2024-01-16 |website=IEA |language=en-GB |quote=Biofuels and renewable electricity are set to reduce transport sector oil demand by near 4 mboe/d by 2028, more than 7% of forecast transport oil demand, and when electricity from non-renewable sources such as nuclear, natural gas and coal is taken into account, this value rises to nearly 9%.}}

Peak oil relates closely to oil depletion; while petroleum reserves are finite, the key issue is the economic viability of extraction at current prices.{{Cite web|title=Petroleum - Status of the world oil supply|url=https://www.britannica.com/science/petroleum|access-date=4 August 2021|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|language=en}}{{Cite web|last=Clemente|first=Jude|title=U.S. Oil Reserves, Resources, and Unlimited Future Supply|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/judeclemente/2015/04/02/u-s-oil-reserves-resources-and-unlimited-future-supply/|access-date=4 August 2021|website=Forbes|language=en}} Initially, it was believed that oil production would decline due to reserve depletion, but a new theory suggests that reduced oil demand could lower prices, affecting extraction costs. Demand may also decline due to persistent high prices.{{Cite web|date=2 August 2019|title=Wells, Wires, and Wheels - EROCI and the Tough Road Ahead for Oil|url=https://investors-corner.bnpparibas-am.com/investment-themes/sri/petrol-eroci-petroleum-age/|access-date=25 September 2019|website=Investors' Corner|language=en-US}}

Over the last century, many predictions of peak oil timing have been made, often later proven incorrect due to increased extraction rates.Kenneth S. Deffeyes, [https://www.amazon.com/Hubberts-Peak-Impending-World-Shortage/dp/B001NC2AZW/ref=sr_1_8?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1388901805&sr=1-8&keywords=hubbert%27s+peak Hubbert's Peak: The Impending World Oil Shortage] (Princeton University Press, 2001). M. King Hubbert introduced the concept in a 1956 paper, predicting U.S. production would peak between 1965 and 1971, but his global peak oil predictions were premature because of improved drilling technology.{{cite conference|last=Hubbert|first=Marion King|author-link=M. King Hubbert|date=June 1956|title=Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels 'Drilling and Production Practice'|url=http://www.hubbertpeak.com/hubbert/1956/1956.pdf|conference=American Petroleum Institute|location=San Antonio, Texas|publisher=Shell Development Company|pages=22–27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080527233843/http://www.hubbertpeak.com/hubbert/1956/1956.pdf|archive-date=27 May 2008|access-date=18 April 2008|url-status=dead}} Current forecasts for the year of peak oil range from 2028 to 2050.{{Cite web |title=Standard Chartered Says Peak Oil Demand Is Not Imminent |url=https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Standard-Chartered-Says-Peak-Oil-Demand-Is-Not-Imminent.html |access-date=2024-07-18 |website=OilPrice.com |language=en}} These estimates depend on future economic trends, technological advances, and efforts to mitigate climate change.{{Cite web|date=13 September 2020|title=Global oil demand may have passed peak, says BP energy report|url=http://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/sep/14/global-oil-demand-may-have-passed-peak-says-bp-energy-report|access-date=16 September 2020|website=The Guardian|language=en}}{{Cite web|date=2 October 2018|title=Now near 100 million bpd, when will oil demand peak?|url=https://blogs.thomsonreuters.com/sustainability/2018/10/02/now-near-100-million-bpd-when-will-oil-demand-peak/|access-date=25 September 2019|website=Sustainability|language=en-US|archive-date=25 September 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190925111724/https://blogs.thomsonreuters.com/sustainability/2018/10/02/now-near-100-million-bpd-when-will-oil-demand-peak/|url-status=dead}}

Supply

File:Global liquids and US tight oil.png{{Main|Oil and gas reserves and resource quantification}}

=Defining oil=

Oil, or petroleum, is a mixture of hydrocarbon substances. By its very nature, what "oil" is may vary. The geology of a region affects the type of oil underground. The types of hydrocarbons produced from an oilfield may also vary depending on the geology.

Crude oil generally comes in various 'grades,'{{Cite web |title=Crude grades |url=http://www.mckinseyenergyinsights.com/resources/refinery-reference-desk/crude-grades/ |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=www.mckinseyenergyinsights.com |language=en}} commonly classified as "light," "medium," 'heavy," and "extra heavy."{{cite web |year=2014 |title=conventional oil definition from Canadian Association of Oil Producers |url=http://www.capp.ca/canadaIndustry/oil/Pages/default.aspx |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150323080728/http://www.capp.ca/canadaIndustry/oil/Pages/default.aspx |archive-date=23 March 2015 |access-date=4 December 2014 |work=Crude Oil}} The exact definitions of these grades vary depending on the region from which the oil came. Grades of oil are also assessed by API gravity. Light oil flows naturally to the surface or can be extracted by simply pumping it from the ground. Heavy refers to oil that has higher density and lower API gravity.{{cite web |title=The Schlumberger Oilfield Glossary |url=http://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/en/Disciplines/Heavy-Oil.aspx |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170515184309/http://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/en/Disciplines/Heavy-Oil.aspx |archive-date=15 May 2017 |access-date=16 August 2015 |website=Schlumberger}} It does not flow as easily, and its consistency can be similar to that of molasses. While some of it can be produced using conventional techniques, recovery rates are better using unconventional methods.{{cite web |year=2015 |title=Heavy Crude Oil |url=http://www.petroleum.co.uk/heavy-crude-oil |access-date=4 November 2015 |work=An introduction to Petroleum}}

Generally, especially with regard to peak oil, the primary concern regards what is called "crude oil" production (which may also be referred to as "crude and condensate" production in US EIA statistics), which is what is actually refined into the common fuels most people know such as gasoline and diesel fuel, in addition to other common fuels. Other oil production statistics may be named "total liquids production" or "petroleum and other liquids" in EIA statistics.{{Cite web |title=International - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) |url=https://www.eia.gov/international/data/world/petroleum-and-other-liquids/annual-petroleum-and-other-liquids-production |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=www.eia.gov}} This includes crude oil production in addition to other hydrocarbon liquids, such as natural-gas liquids (NGLs).{{Cite web |title=Glossary - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) |url=https://www.eia.gov/tools/glossary/index.php |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=www.eia.gov}} These two production numbers are distinct and shouldn't be considered the same thing. Using "total liquids" production to refer to "crude oil" production is misleading. The extra liquids included in "total liquids" production do not refine into the same products. It can be misleading as it could be used to inflate the actual amount of crude oil being produced globally.

Where oil may come from is commonly divided into two categories, "conventional" oil sources and "unconventional" oil sources. The terms are not strictly defined and may vary within literature. As a result of the wide range of potential definitions, different oil production forecasts may vary based on which classes of liquids they choose to include or exclude. Some standard definitions for "conventional" and "unconventional" oil are detailed below.

File:OilProductionTightTotalHubbert-dec2021.svg

=Conventional sources=

Conventional oil is oil that is extracted using "traditional" techniques (i.e., in common use before 2000) techniques.{{Cite web |title=Definition - Conventional Oil - Alberta's Energy Heritage |url=http://www.history.alberta.ca/energyheritage/oil/pre-modern-global-history/definition.aspx |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=www.history.alberta.ca}} Conventional oil commonly refers to onshore oilfields and shallow offshore oilfields that are "easy" to extract.

It has been recognized that conventional oil production has peaked around 2005–2006.{{Cite journal |last1=Delannoy |first1=Louis |last2=Longaretti |first2=Pierre-Yves |last3=Murphy |first3=David J. |last4=Prados |first4=Emmanuel |date=2021-12-15 |title=Peak oil and the low-carbon energy transition: A net-energy perspective |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261921011673 |journal=Applied Energy |volume=304 |pages=117843 |doi=10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117843 |bibcode=2021ApEn..30417843D |issn=0306-2619}}{{Citation |last=Michaux |first=Simon |date=2020 |title=GTK Oil from a Critical Raw Material Perspective FINAL CC signatures |url=http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/RG.2.2.16253.31203 |language=en |doi=10.13140/RG.2.2.16253.31203}} What has prevented peak oil from then on is US tight oil production,{{Cite web |title=Petroleum & Other Liquids Data - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) |url=https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/data.php |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=www.eia.gov}} which rapidly increased since the Global Financial Crisis in 2008. Additionally, but to a lesser extent, Canadian oil-sands production has helped increase oil supply since 2008.{{Cite web |title=Canada: total oil sands production 2021 |url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/484927/canadian-oil-sands-total-production/ |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=Statista |language=en}}

In the same way, sources of natural gas production are usually divided into "conventional" and "unconventional".

=Unconventional sources=

{{Main|Unconventional oil}}

File:US Crude Oil Production and Imports.svg

Unlike conventional oil, unconventional oil refers to oil that is "difficult" to extract. The number of steps required translates into extremely high production costs. Common unconventional oil sources include:

  • Tight oil refers to oil extracted from deposits of low-permeability rock using hydraulic fracturing techniques (commonly referred to as "fracking").{{cite web |title=The Schlumberger Oilfield Glossary |url=http://www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com/en/Terms/t/tight_oil.aspx |access-date=6 September 2015 |website=Schlumberger}} Hydraulic fracturing is a process where a well is first drilled and then fluid containing water, chemicals, and sand is injected at very high pressures to create fractures in the rock.{{Cite web |title=How Hydraulic Fracturing Works |url=https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/how-hydraulic-fracturing-works |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=education.nationalgeographic.org |language=en}} This process has generated controversy as fluid injections may trigger seismic activity, in addition to concerns regarding the chemicals used.{{Cite news |date=2011-08-06 |title=What is fracking and why is it controversial? |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-14432401 |access-date=2024-01-18 |work=BBC News |language=en-GB}} Additionally, tight oil is also commonly referred to as "shale oil" due to the oil often being in shale deposits. Due to this nickname, tight oil is often confused with oil shale, which is a completely different process of oil extraction. This process involves manufacturing oil from the kerogen contained in an oil shale.
  • Oil sands are unconsolidated sandstone deposits containing large amounts of very viscous crude bitumen or extra-heavy crude oil that can be recovered by surface mining or by in-situ oil wells using steam injection or other techniques. It can be liquefied by upgrading, blending with diluent, or by heating; and then processed by a conventional oil refinery. The material found in oil sands is an extra-heavy and viscous form of oil known as bitumen.{{cite web |title= Bitumen and Oil Sands |work= An introduction to Petroleum |url= http://www.petroleum.co.uk/bituemn |access-date= 19 November 2015 |archive-date= 20 March 2023 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20230320164707/https://www.petroleum.co.uk/bituemn |url-status= dead }}

Other less common unconventional oil sources include oil shale (see article).

Production of tight oil is mainly concentrated in the United States due to world-class geology and ease of borrowing (tight oil production is extremely expensive).{{Cite web |last=Brady |first=Aaron |date=September 10, 2021 |title=Global crude oil cost curve shows 90% of projects through 2040 breaking even below $50/bbl |url=https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/ci/research-analysis/global-crude-oil-curve-shows-projects-break-even-through-2040.html |website=S&P Global Commodity Insights}} Oil sands production is also concentrated in Canada for the same exact reasons (but different type of oil). There are also economic tight oil deposits in Argentina known as the Vaca Muerta Formation, but are less developed than tight oil in the US due to a lack of infrastructure and less capacity to borrow money.{{Cite news |last=Raszweski |first=Eliana |date=December 27, 2022 |title=Argentina's Vaca Muerta shale boom is running out of road |url=https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/argentinas-vaca-muerta-shale-boom-is-running-out-road-2022-12-27/ |access-date=January 18, 2024 |work=Reuters}}

In recent history, production of tight oil led to a resurgence of US production in the 2010s. US tight oil production initially peaked in March 2015{{cite web |last1=Mushalik |first1=Matt |title=US shale oil peak in 2015 |url=http://crudeoilpeak.info/us-shale-oil-peak-in-2015 |access-date=21 April 2016 |website=Crude Oil Peak}} and fell by 12 per cent over the next 18 months; but then production rose again, and by September 2017 production had exceeded the old peak.US Energy Information Administration, [https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/data.php#crude Estimates of tight oil production], accessed 9 December 2017 As of 2024, US oil production, especially tight oil production, is higher than ever thanks to the Permian Basin.

Venezuela has oil sands deposits similar in size to those of Canada, and approximately equal to the world's reserves of conventional oil. Venezuela's Orinoco Belt tar sands are less viscous than Canada's Athabasca oil sands – meaning they can be produced by more conventional means – but they are buried too deep to be extracted by surface mining. Estimates of the recoverable reserves of the Orinoco Belt range from {{convert|100|Goilbbl|e9m3}} to {{convert|270|Goilbbl|e9m3}}. In 2009, USGS updated this value to {{convert|513|Goilbbl|m3}}.{{cite web |author1=Christopher J. Schenk |author2=Troy A. Cook |author3=Ronald R. Charpentier |author4=Richard M. Pollastro |author5=Timothy R. Klett |author6=Marilyn E. Tennyson |author7=Mark A. Kirschbaum |author8=Michael E. Brownfield |author9=Janet K. Pitman. |name-list-style=amp |date=11 January 2010 |title=An Estimate of Recoverable Heavy Oil Resources of the Orinoco Oil Belt, Venezuela |url=http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2009/3028/pdf/FS09-3028.pdf |access-date=23 January 2010 |publisher=USGS}}

While not an actual source of unconventional oil, processes which convert other hydrocarbons are similar to unconventional oil in that they are 'unconventional' and very costly to produce. They include coal liquefaction or gas to liquids which produce synthetic fuels from coal or natural gas via the Fischer–Tropsch process, Bergius process, or Karrick process.

=Discoveries=

File:World crude discovery production U-2200Gb LaherrereMar2015.jpg{{blockquote|All the easy oil and gas in the world has pretty much been found. Now comes the harder work in finding and producing oil from more challenging environments and work areas. | William J. Cummings, Exxon-Mobil company spokesman, December 2005

{{cite news|url=https://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2005/12/11/price_rise_and_new_deep_water_technology_opened_up_offshore_drilling/|title=Price rise and new deep-water technology opened up offshore drilling|date=11 December 2005|last = Donnelly |first = John|work=Boston Globe|access-date=21 August 2008}}}}

{{blockquote|It is pretty clear that there is not much chance of finding any significant quantity of new cheap oil. Any new or unconventional oil is going to be expensive. | Lord Ron Oxburgh, a former chairman of Shell, October 2008"[https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704140104575057260398292350 The Next Crisis: Prepare for Peak Oil]". The Wall Street Journal. 11 February 2010.}}

{{clear}}

Global discoveries of oilfields peaked in the 1960s{{cite web |url=http://energycrisis.org/de/lecture.html |title=Peak Oil Presentation at the Technical University of Clausthal |last = Campbell |first = C. J. |date=December 2000 |publisher= energycrisis.org |access-date=21 August 2008}} at around {{convert|55|Goilbbl|m3}} per year.{{cite journal |url=http://www.worldenergysource.com/articles/pdf/longwell_WE_v5n3.pdf |title=The Future of the Oil and Gas Industry: Past Approaches, New Challenges |last=Longwell |first=Harry J. |year=2002 |journal=World Energy Magazine |volume=5 |pages=100–104 |access-date=21 August 2008 |issue=3 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081003081853/http://www.worldenergysource.com/articles/pdf/longwell_WE_v5n3.pdf |archive-date=3 October 2008 |url-status=dead }} More recently, 2021 was the worst year for oil and gas discoveries dating back to 1946.{{Cite web |date=2021-12-28 |title=Oil and gas discoveries are at the lowest level since 1946 |url=https://qz.com/2107452/oil-and-gas-discoveries-are-at-the-lowest-level-since-1946 |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=Quartz |language=en}} This is to be expected of a finite resource. But despite the fall-off in new field discoveries, the reported proved reserves of crude oil remaining in the ground in 2014, which totaled 1,490 billion barrels, were more than quadruple the 1965 proved reserves of 354 billion barrels.OPEC, [http://www.opec.org/library/Annual%20Statistical%20Bulletin/interactive/current/FileZ/Main.htm Annual Statistical/ Annual Statistical Bulletin 2014] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140423215631/http://www.opec.org/library/Annual%20Statistical%20Bulletin/interactive/current/FileZ/Main.htm |date=23 April 2014 }}. A researcher for the U.S. Energy Information Administration has pointed out that after the first wave of discoveries in an area, most oil and natural gas reserve growth comes not from discoveries of new fields, but from extensions and additional gas found within existing fields.David F. Morehouse, [http://eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/natural_gas/feature_articles/1997/intricate_puzzle_oil_gas_reserves_growth/pdf/m07fa.pdf The intricate puzzle of oil and gas reserve growth] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100806145740/http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/natural_gas/feature_articles/1997/intricate_puzzle_oil_gas_reserves_growth/pdf/m07fa.pdf |date=6 August 2010 }}, US Energy Information Administration, Natural Gas Monthly, July 1997.

A report by the UK Energy Research Centre noted that "discovery" is often used ambiguously, and explained the seeming contradiction between falling discovery rates since the 1960s and increasing reserves by the phenomenon of reserve growth. The report noted that increased reserves within a field may be discovered or developed by new technology years or decades after the original discovery. But because of the practice of "backdating", any new reserves within a field, even those to be discovered decades after the field discovery, are attributed to the year of initial field discovery, creating an illusion that discovery is not keeping pace with production.Steve Sorrell and others, Global Oil Depletion, UK Energy Research Centre, {{ISBN|1-903144-03-5}}, p. 24–25.

As of 2010, finding new oil had reportedly become much more difficult and expensive, as oil producers had to search through more remote and inhospitable parts of the planet.{{Cite news |date=February 11, 2010 |title=Oil exploration costs rocket as risks rise |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE61A28X20100211/ |work=Reuters}}

=Oil reserves=

{{Main|Oil reserves|List of oil fields}}

File:Oil Reserves.png, 2013]]

Different classes of potential conventional crude oil reserves include crude oil with 90% certainty of being technically able to be produced from reservoirs (through a wellbore using primary, secondary, improved, enhanced, or tertiary methods); all crude with a 50% probability of being produced in the future (probable); and discovered reserves that have a 10% possibility of being produced in the future (possible). Reserve estimates based on these are referred to as 1P, proven (at least 90% probability); 2P, proven and probable (at least 50% probability); and 3P, proven, probable and possible (at least 10% probability), respectively.{{cite web|last1=Etherington|display-authors=etal|first1=John|title=Comparison of Selected Reserves and Resource Classifications and Associated Definitions|url=http://www.spe.org/industry/docs/OGR_Mapping.pdf|website=Society of Petroleum Engineers|access-date=26 September 2016}}

As stated previously, oil is divided up into different types, therefore those counting up reserves should keep that in mind. Conventional oil reserves are different than unconventional reserves.

==Concerns over stated oil reserves==

{{blockquote|[World] reserves are confused and in fact inflated. Many of the so-called reserves are in fact resources. They're not delineated, they're not accessible, they're not available for production.|Sadad Al Husseini, former VP of Aramco, presentation to the Oil and Money conference, October 2007.}}

Sadad Al Husseini estimated that {{convert|300|Goilbbl}} of the world's {{convert|1200|Goilbbl}} of proven reserves should be recategorized as speculative resources.{{cite web |author=Cohen, Dave |date=31 October 2007 |title=The Perfect Storm |url=http://www.aspo-usa.com/archives/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=243&Itemid=91 |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110707180911/http://www.aspo-usa.com/archives/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=243&Itemid=91 |archive-date=7 July 2011 |access-date=27 July 2008 |publisher=Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas}}

File:OPEC declared reserves 1980-now EIA.svg

One difficulty in forecasting the date of peak oil is the opacity surrounding the oil reserves classified as "proven". In many major producing countries, the majority of reserves claims have not been subject to outside audit or examination.{{Cite journal |last1=Laherrère |first1=Jean |last2=Hall |first2=Charles A. S. |last3=Bentley |first3=Roger |date=2022-01-01 |title=How much oil remains for the world to produce? Comparing assessment methods, and separating fact from fiction |journal=Current Research in Environmental Sustainability |volume=4 |pages=100174 |doi=10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100174 |issn=2666-0490|doi-access=free |bibcode=2022CRES....400174L }}

For the most part, proven reserves are stated by the oil companies, the producer states and the consumer states. All three have reasons to overstate their proven reserves: oil companies may look to increase their potential worth; producer countries gain a stronger international stature; and governments of consumer countries may seek a means to foster sentiments of security and stability within their economies and among consumers.

Major discrepancies arise from accuracy issues with the self-reported numbers from the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). Besides the possibility that these nations have overstated their reserves for political reasons (during periods of no substantial discoveries), over 70 nations also follow a practice of not reducing their reserves to account for yearly production. Analysts have suggested that OPEC member nations have economic incentives to exaggerate their reserves, as the OPEC quota system allows greater output for countries with greater reserves.

{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/21/magazine/21OIL.html|title=The Breaking Point|author=Maass Peter|work=The New York Times|date= 21 August 2005|access-date=26 August 2008}}

==Reserves of unconventional oil==

{{Main|Unconventional oil|Heavy crude oil|Oil sands|Oil shale|Fischer–Tropsch process}}

File:Syncrude mildred lake plant.jpg, Alberta ]]

As conventional oil becomes less available, it can be replaced with production of liquids from unconventional sources such as tight oil, oil sands, ultra-heavy oils, gas-to-liquid technologies, coal-to-liquid technologies, biofuel technologies, and shale oil.[http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/archive/ieo04/pdf/0484%282004%29.pdf IEO 2004] pg. 37 In the 2007 and subsequent International Energy Outlook editions, the word "Oil" was replaced with "Liquids" in the chart of world energy consumption.[http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/archive/ieo06/pdf/0484%282006%29.pdf IEO 2006] Figure 3. pg. 2[http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/archive/ieo07/pdf/0484%282007%29.pdf IEO 2007] Figure 3. pg. 2 In 2009 biofuels was included in "Liquids" instead of in "Renewables".[http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/archive/ieo09/pdf/0484%282009%29.pdf IEO 2009] Figure 2. pg. 1 The inclusion of natural gas liquids, a bi-product of natural gas extraction, in "Liquids" has been criticized as it is mostly a chemical feedstock which is generally not used as transport fuel.{{cite web|last1=Mearns|first1=Euan|title=Global Oil and Other Liquid Fuels Production Update|url=http://euanmearns.com/global-oil-and-other-liquid-fuels-production-update/|website=Energy Matters|access-date=21 August 2015|date=3 November 2014}}

File:Texas Oil Production 1935-2012.png

Reserve estimates are based on profitability, which depends on both oil price and cost of production. Hence, unconventional sources such as heavy crude oil, oil sands, and oil shale may be included as new techniques reduce the cost of extraction.{{cite journal|last1=Owen|first1=Nick A.|title=The status of conventional world oil reserves—Hype or cause for concern?|journal=Energy Policy|date=2010|volume=38|issue=8|pages=4743–4749|doi=10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.026|bibcode=2010EnPol..38.4743O |display-authors=etal}} With rule changes by the SEC,{{cite web |url= https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2008/33-8995.pdf|title= Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting|work=1 January 2010 (Rule changes effective)|publisher= SEC|access-date=29 March 2010}} oil companies can now book them as proven reserves after opening a strip mine or thermal facility for extraction. These unconventional sources are more labor and resource intensive to produce, however, requiring extra energy to refine, resulting in higher production costs and up to three times more greenhouse gas emissions per barrel (or barrel equivalent) on a "well to tank" basis or 10 to 45% more on a "well to wheels" basis, which includes the carbon emitted from combustion of the final product.{{cite web|url= https://www.grandforksherald.com/newsmd/albertas-oilsands-well-managed-necessity-or-ecological-disaster|title= Alberta's oilsands: well-managed necessity or ecological disaster?|author= Bob Weber|publisher= Moose Jaw Herald, The Canadian Press|access-date= 15 January 2025}}{{cite news |url=http://www.rigzone.com/news/article.asp?a_id=30703 |title=Canadian Tar Sands: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly |date=28 March 2006 |author=Duarte, Joe |publisher=RigZone |access-date=11 July 2009}}

While the energy used, resources needed, and environmental effects of extracting unconventional sources have traditionally been prohibitively high, major unconventional oil sources being considered for large-scale production are the extra heavy oil in the Orinoco Belt of Venezuela,{{cite web|last1=Schenk|first1=C.J.|title=An Estimate of Recoverable Heavy Oil Resources of the Orinoco Oil Belt, Venezuela|url=http://www.pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2009/3028/pdf/FS09-3028.pdf|website=United States Geological Survey|access-date=16 November 2015|display-authors=etal|archive-date=24 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170224072032/https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2009/3028/pdf/FS09-3028.pdf|url-status=dead}} the Athabasca Oil Sands in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin,{{cite web |url=http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/102spring2002_Web_projects/M.Sexton/ |title=Tar Sands: A brief overview |author=Sexton, Matt |year=2003 |access-date=11 July 2009}} and the oil shale of the Green River Formation in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming in the United States.{{Cite journal | last=Dyni | first=John R. | title=Geology and resources of some world oil-shale deposits (Presented at Symposium on Oil Shale in Tallinn, Estonia, 18–21 November 2002) | journal=Oil Shale. A Scientific-Technical Journal | volume=20 | issue=3 | pages=193–252 | year=2003 | doi=10.3176/oil.2003.3.02 | url=http://www.kirj.ee/public/oilshale/2_dyni_2003_3.pdf | issn=0208-189X| access-date =17 June 2007}}{{Cite journal | title =Strategic significance of America's oil shale resource. Volume II: Oil shale resources, technology and economics |author1=Johnson, Harry R. |author2=Crawford, Peter M. |author3=Bunger, James W. | publisher= Office of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Petroleum Reserves; Office of Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves; United States Department of Energy | year=2004 | url=http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/reserves/npr/publications/npr_strategic_significancev2.pdf | access-date=23 June 2007}} Energy companies such as Syncrude and Suncor have been extracting bitumen for decades but production has increased greatly in recent years with the development of steam-assisted gravity drainage and other extraction technologies.{{cite journal |author1=Qi Jiang |author2=Bruce Thornton |author3=Jen Russel-Houston |author4=Steve Spence. |title=Review of Thermal Recovery Technologies for the Clearwater and Lower Grand Rapids Formations in the Cold Lake Area in Alberta |journal=Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology |date=2010 |volume=49 |issue=9 |page=2 |doi=10.2118/140118-PA |bibcode=2010BCaPG..49....2J |url=http://www.osumcorp.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/CIPC_Review-of-Thermal-Recovery-Technologies-for-the-Clearwater-and-Lower-Grand-Rapids-Formations-in-the-Cold-Lake-Area-of-Alberta.pdf |access-date=2 December 2016 |archive-date=3 December 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211203140410/https://www.osumcorp.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/CIPC_Review-of-Thermal-Recovery-Technologies-for-the-Clearwater-and-Lower-Grand-Rapids-Formations-in-the-Cold-Lake-Area-of-Alberta.pdf |url-status=dead }}

Chuck Masters of the USGS estimates that, "Taken together, these resource occurrences, in the Western Hemisphere, are approximately equal to the Identified Reserves of conventional crude oil accredited to the Middle East."{{cite web |url= https://billkovarik.com/bio/oil-fallacy1/ |title= The oil reserve fallacy: Proven reserves are not a measure of future supply |author= Kovarik, Bill |access-date=11 July 2009}} Authorities familiar with the resources believe that the world's ultimate reserves of unconventional oil are several times as large as those of conventional oil and will be highly profitable for companies as a result of higher prices in the 21st century.{{cite journal | first = Maurice | last = Dusseault | title = Emerging Technology for Economic Heavy Oil Development | publisher = Alberta Department of Energy | year = 2002 | url = http://www.energy.gov.ab.ca/OilSands/pdfs/RPT_Chops_app2.pdf | access-date = 24 May 2008 | archive-date = 27 May 2016 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160527223357/http://www.energy.gov.ab.ca/OilSands/pdfs/RPT_Chops_app2.pdf | url-status = dead }} In October 2009, the USGS updated the Orinoco tar sands (Venezuela) recoverable "mean value" to {{convert|513|Goilbbl|m3}}, with a 90% chance of being within the range of 380-{{convert|652|Goilbbl}}, making this area "one of the world's largest recoverable oil accumulations".

File:Total World Oil Reserves Conventional Unconventional.png

Moreover, oil extracted from these sources typically contains contaminants such as sulfur and heavy metals that are energy-intensive to extract and can leave tailings, ponds containing hydrocarbon sludge, in some cases.{{cite journal |title=Downhole heavy crude oil hydroprocessing |journal=Applied Catalysis A: General |last1=Weissman | first1=Jeffrey G. |last2=Kessler |first2=Richard V. |date=20 June 1996 |volume=140 |issue=1 |pages= 1–16 |issn = 0926-860X |doi=10.1016/0926-860X(96)00003-8}} The same applies to much of the Middle East's undeveloped conventional oil reserves, much of which is heavy, viscous, and contaminated with sulfur and metals to the point of being unusable.{{cite journal | first = David | last = Fleming | title = After Oil | journal = Prospect Magazine | year = 2000 | url = http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2000/11/afteroil/ | access-date = 20 December 2009 | archive-date = 10 December 2011 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111210142929/http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2000/11/afteroil/ | url-status = dead }} However, high oil prices make these sources more financially appealing. A study by Wood Mackenzie suggests that by the early 2020s all the world's extra oil supply is likely to come from unconventional sources.{{cite news |url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/11ba213e-bf7e-11db-9ac2-000b5df10621.html|title=Study sees harmful hunt for extra oil

|work=Financial Times|author=Hoyos, Carola|date=18 February 2007| access-date =11 July 2009}}

=Production=

{{Main|Extraction of petroleum}}

Globally, oil production is very concentrated. Not just geographically depending on the country, but depending on the oilfields themselves. As of 2014, it was recognized that 25 oilfields account for 25% of global oil production, and a few hundred 'giant' oilfields (reserves greater than 500 million barrels) account for 50% of global oil production.{{Cite journal |last1=Höök |first1=Mikael |last2=Davidsson |first2=Simon |last3=Johansson |first3=Sheshti |last4=Tang |first4=Xu |date=2014-01-13 |title=Decline and depletion rates of oil production: a comprehensive investigation |url=https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2012.0448 |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences |language=en |volume=372 |issue=2006 |pages=20120448 |doi=10.1098/rsta.2012.0448 |pmid=24298082 |issn=1364-503X}} Globally, the amount of oilfields is estimated to be between 50,000-70,000. Additionally, it has now been recognized that worldwide oil discoveries have been less than worldwide annual oil production since about 1980.{{Cite web |title=Current World Oil Situation |url=https://planetforlife.com/oilcrisis/oilsituation.html |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=planetforlife.com}}

More recently, there has been some research about the net energy of oil production.L. Delannoy et al., [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306261921011673 "Peak oil and the low-carbon energy transition: A net-energy perspective"] Applied Energy, 2021, v.304, 117843. Regarding energy production, what also matters is the "Energy Return on Investment" (EROI). To put it simply, in order to produce energy one must also invest some energy, and the EROI is the return on investment in energy terms. With regards to conventional and unconventional oil, it is recognized that conventional oil offers a much higher EROI than unconventional sources of oil. In reality, the EROI is felt through the cost of production. A higher EROI generally translates to a lower cost of production and higher (monetary) profits for the oil company, and a lower EROI generally translates to a higher cost of production and lower (monetary) profits for the oil company. A higher energy investment means physically using more materials (which require energy to produce) in order to produce energy. Oil sources with a lower EROI are theoretically more environmentally damaging than those with higher EROIs, due to the larger amount of resources required to extract the oil.{{Cite web |title=Unconventional Fossil Fuels Factsheet |url=https://css.umich.edu/publications/factsheets/energy/unconventional-fossil-fuels-factsheet |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=Center for Sustainable Systems |language=en}} For instance, building a gigantic oil rig produces a lot of greenhouse gas emissions, but is a requirement to access "difficult" deep water offshore oil reserves.

==Oil field decline==

{{Main|Oil depletion}}

File:Alaska Crude Oil Production.PNG

As a finite resource, naturally every oilfield eventually declines. Generally, the production profile of a typical oil well is that first production increases, then it plateaus, and then it declines.{{Cite web |title=Theoretical production profile of an oilfield, describing various stages of development in an idealized case. |url=https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Theoretical-production-profile-of-an-oilfield-describing-various-stages-of-development_fig3_225365392 |website=ResearchGate}} This is the underlying assumption of the Hubbert peak theory. The chart to the right shows the decline of Alaskan oil production since after the 1980s, which is reflective of a typical pattern of decline among most oilfields.

Meanwhile, unconventional oil production follows a different production profile depending on the type. For tight oil, production begins at its maximum, or near its maximum, and then quickly peaks afterwards permanently.{{Cite web |date=2022-03-01 |title=Aging US Shale Wells: Years of Remaining Opportunities or Growing Asset Retirement Obligations? |url=https://jpt.spe.org/aging-us-shale-wells-years-of-remaining-opportunities-or-growing-asset-retirement-obligations |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=JPT |language=en}}

As mentioned previously in the production section, oil production is very concentrated in a few fields, therefore these few fields (out of every field) can dictate where oil production would be headed. If these few fields were to decline, then all oil production would decline. In 2019 when Saudi Aramco went public, the Ghawar oilfield, which is the largest oil field in the world, was revealed to be producing much lower than what conventional wisdom at the time had assumed its production was.{{Cite news |last=Blas |first=Javier |date=April 2, 2019 |title=The Biggest Saudi Oil Field Is Fading Faster Than Anyone Guessed |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-02/saudi-aramco-reveals-sharp-output-drop-at-super-giant-oil-field |work=Bloomberg}} Although while no official data exists, certain analysts believe that the Ghawar field has entered into decline,{{Cite web |title=What is the Real Size of the Saudi Oil Reserves? (Pt 2/2) |url=https://blog.gorozen.com/blog/what-is-the-real-size-of-the-saudi-oil-reserves-pt-2/2 |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=blog.gorozen.com |language=en-us}}{{Cite web |last=Resilience |date=2022-08-09 |title=The Status of Global Oil Production (Part 2) |url=https://www.resilience.org/stories/2022-08-09/the-status-of-global-oil-production-part-2/ |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=resilience |language=en-US}} corroborated by the aforementioned news from 2019.

According to the US EIA in 2006, Saudi Aramco Senior Vice President Abdullah Saif estimated that its existing fields were declining at a rate of 5% to 12% per year.{{cite web|url=http://www.eia.doe.gov/cabs/saudi.html |title=Country Analysis Briefs: Saudi Arabia |publisher=United States Energy Information Administration |date=August 2008 |access-date=4 September 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070412143230/http://www.eia.doe.gov/cabs/saudi.html |archive-date=12 April 2007}} According to a study of large oilfields (reserves greater than 500 million barrels) published in 2009, the average decline rate of onshore fields was about 5%, and offshore fields were about 9.5%.{{Cite journal |last1=Höök |first1=Mikael |last2=Hirsch |first2=Robert |last3=Aleklett |first3=Kjell |date=2009-06-01 |title=Giant oil field decline rates and their influence on world oil production |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421509001281 |journal=Energy Policy |series=China Energy Efficiency |volume=37 |issue=6 |pages=2262–2272 |doi=10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.020 |bibcode=2009EnPol..37.2262H |issn=0301-4215}} An annual rate of decline of 5.1% in 800 of the world's largest oil fields was reported by the International Energy Agency in their World Energy Outlook 2008.{{cite journal |url=http://www.iea.org/Textbase/npsum/WEO2008SUM.pdf |title=World Energy Outlook 2008 Executive Summary |publisher=International Energy Agency |date=12 November 2008 |access-date=24 November 2008}} In 2013 an informal study of 733 giant oil fields concluded that only 32% of the ultimately recoverable oil remained.{{cite web |last1=Patterson |first1=Ron |title=JODI Data and Giant Field Depletion |url=http://peakoilbarrel.com/jodi-data-and-giant-field-depletion/ |access-date=18 November 2015 |website=Peak Oil Barrel|date=23 September 2015 }}

Demand

[[File:OilConsumptionpercapita.png|thumb|450x450px|Oil consumption in bbl per day per capita (darker colors represent more consumption, gray represents no data) (source: NationMaster statistics, 2007-01-13){{Update inline|date=January 2025|reason=Chinese oil consumption per capita has greatly increased since 2007}}

style="width: 100%; font-size: 1em;"
valign="top" |

{{legend2|#800000| > 0.07}}

{{legend2|#a52a2a|0.07–0.05}}

{{legend2|#ff0000|0.05–0.035}}

{{legend2|#fc8072|0.035–0.025}}

{{legend2|#f08080|0.025–0.02}}

| valign="top" |

{{legend2|#ffb6c1|0.02–0.015}}

{{legend2|#ffebda|0.015–0.01}}

{{legend2|#ffebcf|0.01–0.005}}

{{legend2|#fff8dc|0.005–0.0015}}

{{legend2|#e6e6fa| < 0.0015}}

]]

= Peak oil demand =

More recently, "peak oil demand" has become a more popular interpretation of peak oil. The International International Energy Agency (IEA) argues that the world will first intentionally reduce oil demand before supply issues actually become a problem, as to address climate change and greenhouse gas emissions.{{Cite news |last=Lawler |first=Alex |date=October 24, 2023 |title=World oil, gas, coal demand to peak by 2030, IEA says |url=https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/world-oil-gas-coal-demand-peak-by-2030-iea-says-2023-10-24/ |work=Reuters}}

Unlike peak oil demand, peak oil generally is concerned with the global supply of oil, due to the importance of oil to the global economy.

The central idea revolves around technological advancements such as the development of electric vehicles and potentially biofuels in order to phase out gasoline or diesel powered vehicles. Then, in theory, oil demand would fall over time.

In the past 4 decades, oil demand has secularly increased.{{Cite web |title=Global oil consumption 2022 |url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/265261/global-oil-consumption-in-million-metric-tons/ |access-date=2024-01-19 |website=Statista |language=en}} Generally, oil demand increases unless there is a recession. Recently, in 2020 oil demand sharply fell from 2019 levels due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but recovered swiftly by 2022.

In 2020, British Petroleum (BP) claimed that the world had hit peak oil demand, predicting that oil demand would never recover to pre-pandemic levels due to increased proliferation of electric vehicles and stronger action on climate change.{{Cite web |date=15 September 2020 |title=BP Says We've Already Reached Peak Oil |url=https://earther.gizmodo.com/bp-says-weve-already-reached-peak-oil-1845064372 |access-date=3 October 2020 |website=Earther |language=en-us}}

As of 2023, new projections from Enverus Intelligence Research and the U.S. Energy Information Administration suggest that peak oil demand will not occur before 2030. Enverus forecasts global oil demand to reach 108 million barrels per day by 2030, driven by slower improvements in fuel economy and electric vehicle adoption in the U.S. Similarly, the EIA has updated its estimates, predicting global liquid fuels consumption will be 102.91 million barrels per day in 2024 and 104.26 million barrels per day in 2025, due to higher-than-expected non-OECD consumption. These updates indicate a continued increase in oil demand, potentially exceeding pre-pandemic levels.{{Cite web |title=EIR Says Oil Demand Will Not Peak Before 2030 |url=https://www.rigzone.com/news/eir_says_oil_demand_will_not_peak_before_2030-12-apr-2024-176387-article/ |access-date=2024-04-13 |website=www.rigzone.com |language=en}}

In 2024 OPEC suggested that global demand for oil will not decline.{{Cite web |last=Russell |first=Clyde |date=3 June 2024 |title=OPEC+ bets the robust crude oil demand forecast is right |url=https://www.reuters.com/markets/commodities/opec-bets-robust-crude-oil-demand-forecast-is-right-russell-2024-06-03/ |access-date=2024-06-10 |website=Reuters}}

= Oil as a component of energy demand =

Energy demand is distributed amongst four broad sectors: transportation, residential, commercial, and industrial.{{Cite web |title=Use of energy explained - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) |url=https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/use-of-energy/ |access-date=2024-01-19 |website=www.eia.gov}} Oil demand primarily concerns the transportation sector, as 50% of oil use in OECD countries are for road transportation.{{Cite web |title=OECD oil demand breakdown by sector 2022 |url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/307194/top-oil-consuming-sectors-worldwide/ |access-date=2024-01-19 |website=Statista |language=en}} This is a result of the proliferation of vehicles powered by internal combustion engines. Transportation is therefore of particular interest to those seeking to mitigate the effects of peak oil.

As of 2023, it is forecasted by the IEA that 90% of global oil demand growth will come from the Asia-Pacific region.{{Cite web |last=Ziomecki |first=Mariusz |date=2023-12-20 |title=Asia's energy market: The new global epicenter |url=https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/energy-market/ |access-date=2024-01-19 |website=GIS Reports |language=en-US}} As of 2022, China and India are the second and third largest oil consumers globally.{{Cite web |title=Global oil consumption by country 2022 |url=https://www.statista.com/statistics/271622/countries-with-the-highest-oil-consumption-in-2012/ |access-date=2024-01-19 |website=Statista |language=en}} The United States is still the largest consumer of oil globally (as of 2022).

Generally, when countries economically develop, they use more energy, which includes using more oil. In recent years, China surpassed the United States as the world's largest crude oil importer in 2015.{{cite magazine |last1=McSpadden |first1=Kevin |title=China Has Become the World's Biggest Crude Oil Importer for the First Time |url=https://time.com/3853451/china-crude-oil-top-importer/ |access-date=16 August 2015 |magazine=TIME |publisher=Time Inc.}} This was a result of China developing in addition to US oil exports decreasing due to increased US tight oil production.{{Cite web |title=Oil imports and exports - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) |url=https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/oil-and-petroleum-products/imports-and-exports.php |access-date=2024-01-19 |website=www.eia.gov}}

=Economic growth=

File:Global oil consumption 1980-2013.pngSome analysts argue that the cost of oil has a profound effect on economic growth due to its pivotal role in the extraction of resources and the processing, manufacturing, and transportation of goods.{{cite web |last1=Tverberg |first1=Gail |date=10 August 2015 |title=How Economic Growth Fails |url=http://ourfiniteworld.com/2015/08/10/how-economic-growth-fails/ |access-date=10 January 2016 |website=Our Finite World}}{{cite web |last1=Giraud |first1=Gaël |date=10 April 2014 |title=How dependent is Growth from Primary Energy |url=https://www.parisschoolofeconomics.eu/IMG/pdf/article-pse-medde-juin2014-giraud-kahraman.pdf}} Comparing GDP and energy consumption, there is a clearly defined correlation between having a higher GDP, and having a higher energy consumption.{{Cite web |title=How does energy impact economic growth? An overview of the evidence |url=https://energyforgrowth.org/article/how-does-energy-impact-economic-growth-an-overview-of-the-evidence/ |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=Energy for Growth Hub |language=en-US}} To some degree, this is an intuitive observation as those in very undeveloped countries use a small amount of energy (no electricity), meanwhile those in developed countries use a high amount of energy (electricity consumption, gasoline consumption), and this use of energy translates into economic activity.

There is a concern by more pessimistic analysts that assuming there was a dramatic spike in the price of oil, the world economy may be unable to pay for it, leading to a disconnect between the price of oil that oil producers need to maintain supply, and the price of oil consumers need to be able to afford things.{{cite web |last1=Tverberg |first1=Gail |date=15 November 2013 |title=What's Ahead? Lower Oil Prices, Despite Higher Extraction Costs |url=http://ourfiniteworld.com/2013/11/15/whats-ahead-lower-oil-prices-despite-higher-extraction-cost/ |access-date=10 January 2016 |website=Our Finite World}} This has partially occurred in recent years with the dramatic run-up in oil prices during 2022{{Cite web |date=2023-09-25 |title=Oil prices have risen. That's making gas more expensive for US drivers and helping Russia's war |url=https://apnews.com/article/why-have-oil-prices-gone-up-a9f4ddbd815dd6c6fd90698443e7b8b3 |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=AP News |language=en}} and then the release of the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve in 2022 in order to cool down oil prices.{{Cite news |last=Blas |first=Javier |date=June 17, 2022 |title=The US Is Depleting Its Strategic Petroleum Reserve Faster Than It Looks |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-06-17/the-us-is-depleting-its-strategic-petroleum-reserve-faster-than-it-looks |access-date=January 18, 2024 |work=Bloomberg}}

Possible consequences

{{Further|Hirsch report|Malthusian catastrophe|Societal collapse}}

The wide use of fossil fuels has been one of the most important stimuli of economic growth and prosperity since the Industrial Revolution,{{Cite journal |last1=Ritchie |first1=Hannah |author1-link=Hannah Ritchie |last2=Rosado |first2=Pablo |last3=Roser |first3=Max |author3-link=Max Roser |date=2024-01-05 |title=Fossil fuels |url=https://ourworldindata.org/fossil-fuels |journal=Our World in Data}} allowing humans to participate in takedown, or the consumption of energy at a greater rate than it is being replaced. Some theorize that when oil production significantly decreases, human culture and modern technological society will be forced to change drastically. A rise in oil prices as a result of peak oil could severely impact the cost of transport, food, heating, and electricity globally. A recent example of this has been seen since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022; a global spike in oil and energy prices exacerbated the global energy crisis (2021–present).

The impact of oil supply limitations, assuming they occur, will depend heavily on how severe the limitations are and the development and adoption of effective alternatives.File:EIA global transport energy by fuel 2012.png

= Possible long-term effects on human lifestyle =

Commodity production is heavily globalized in 2024, with almost all major supply chains relying upon diesel fuel or heavy fuel oil to power almost all global shipping and aviation fuel to power all aircraft.{{Cite web |title=Globalization |url=https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/globalization |access-date=2024-01-19 |website=education.nationalgeographic.org |language=en}} A study from the Geologic Survey of Finland found that 90% of the supply chain of all industrially manufactured products depend on oil derived services or oil derived products,{{Cite journal |last=Michaux |first=Simon |date=2020 |title=GTK Oil from a Critical Raw Material Perspective FINAL CC signatures |url=http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/RG.2.2.16253.31203 |language=en |doi=10.13140/RG.2.2.16253.31203}} and World Bank data shows over 30% of global GDP accounted for by exports of goods and services.{{cite web |url=https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS |publisher=World Bank |access-date=3 March 2024 |title=World Bank Open Data }} Many countries with highly developed economies are dependent on food imports (for example, the United Kingdom produced just under half of domestic food consumption as of 2021{{cite web |title=United Kingdom Food Security Report 2021: Theme 2: UK Food Supply Sources |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/united-kingdom-food-security-report-2021/united-kingdom-food-security-report-2021-theme-2-uk-food-supply-sources |access-date=3 March 2024}}), meaning a disruption in trade due to peak oil would exacerbate food insecurity.

Since aviation relies mainly on jet fuels derived from crude oil, commercial aviation has been predicted to go into decline alongside global oil production as it would then become unaffordable for most people.{{cite web|title=Aviation fuels and peak oil (thesis)|author=Emma Nygren|publisher=Uppsala University, UPTEC ES08 033 | year=2008 }} Alternatives such as electric aircraft show promise, but are yet to prove commercially viable as of 2024,{{cite news |last1=Peters |first1=Adele |title=This electric plane is the first one that could actually replace commercial flights |url=https://www.fastcompany.com/91008965/this-electric-plane-is-the-first-one-that-could-actually-replace-commercial-flights |access-date=2 March 2024 |work=FastCo Works |date=12 January 2024 |ref=Elysian}} while hybrids approaches such as a 50% blend of aviation biofuel or utilising metal sails on cargo ships{{cite news |last1=Singleton |first1=Tom |title=Pioneering wind-powered cargo ship sets sail |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-66543643 |access-date=2 March 2024 |work=BBC |date=21 August 2023 |ref=metal sail}} still rely on oil.

= Possible effects on agriculture =

{{See also|Food vs. fuel|2007–2008 world food price crisis|2022-2023 food crises|Agriculture|Food security}}

Supplies of oil are absolutely critical to modern agriculture. Diesel fuel and agrichemicals such as pesticides and fertilizers are directly derived from hydrocarbons.{{Cite journal |last1=Woods |first1=Jeremy |last2=Williams |first2=Adrian |last3=Hughes |first3=John K. |last4=Black |first4=Mairi |last5=Murphy |first5=Richard |date=2010-09-27 |title=Energy and the food system |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=365 |issue=1554 |pages=2991–3006 |doi=10.1098/rstb.2010.0172 |issn=0962-8436 |pmc=2935130 |pmid=20713398}} According to Our World in Data, artificial fertilizers feed over 3.5 billion people as of 2015.{{Cite web |title=How many people does synthetic fertilizer feed? |url=https://ourworldindata.org/how-many-people-does-synthetic-fertilizer-feed |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=Our World in Data}}

The largest consumer of fossil fuels in modern agriculture is ammonia production for fertilizer via the Haber process, which is essential to high-yielding intensive agriculture. The specific fossil fuel input to fertilizer production is primarily natural gas, to provide hydrogen via steam reforming.

More recently, some theorize that hydrogen could be generated without the use of fossil fuels by using renewable electricity for electrolysis. But as of 2024, this remains commercially unviable.{{Cite web |last=Butterworth |first=Lize Wan, Paul |date=2023-02-24 |title=Energy from green hydrogen will be expensive, even in 2050 |url=https://sustainability.crugroup.com/article/energy-from-green-hydrogen-will-be-expensive-even-in-2050 |access-date=2024-01-18 |website=sustainability.crugroup.com |language=en}}

=Possible mitigation=

{{See also|Fossil fuel phase-out}}

In 2005, the United States Department of Energy published a report titled Peaking of World Oil Production: Impacts, Mitigation, & Risk Management.{{cite web |last1=Hirsch |first1=Robert L. |author-link=Robert L. Hirsch |last2=Bezdek |first2=Roger |last3=Wendling |first3=Robert |date=February 2005 |title=Peaking of World Oil Production: Impacts, Mitigation, & Risk Management |url=http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/others/pdf/Oil_Peaking_NETL.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091215043338/http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/others/pdf/Oil_Peaking_NETL.pdf |archive-date=15 December 2009 |access-date=28 November 2009 |publisher=Science Applications International Corporation}} Known as the Hirsch report, it stated, "The peaking of world oil production presents the U.S. and the world with an unprecedented risk management problem."{{cite web |last=Hirsch |first=Robert L. |author-link=Robert L. Hirsch |date=February 2007 |title=Peaking of World Oil Production: Recent Forecasts |url=http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/pubs/Peaking%20of%20World%20Oil%20Production%20-%20Recent%20Forecasts%20-%20NETL%20Re.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110813015940/http://www.netl.doe.gov/energy-analyses/pubs/Peaking%20of%20World%20Oil%20Production%20-%20Recent%20Forecasts%20-%20NETL%20Re.pdf |archive-date=13 August 2011 |access-date=16 February 2013 |publisher=Science Applications International Corporation/U.S.Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory}} To avoid the serious social and economic implications a global decline in oil production could entail, the Hirsch report emphasized the need to find alternatives, at least ten to twenty years before the peak, and to phase out the use of oil over that time. This was similar to a plan proposed for Sweden that same year. Such mitigation could include energy conservation and fuel substitution. The timing of mitigation responses is critical. Premature initiation would be undesirable, but if initiated too late could be more costly and have more negative economic consequences.{{cite journal|last1=Hirsch|first1=Robert L.|title=Peaking of World Oil Production and Its Mitigation|journal=AIChE Journal|date=2006|volume=52|issue=1|pages=2–8|doi=10.1002/aic.10747|bibcode=2006AIChE..52....2H |display-authors=etal|doi-access=free}}

The two major oil consumers, China (second globally) and India (third globally), are taking many steps not to increase their crude oil consumption by encouraging the renewable energy options.{{cite web | url=https://www.ndtv.com/business/decisive-steps-being-taken-to-reduce-crude-oil-imports-narendra-modi-1984364| title= Decisive Steps Being Taken To Reduce Crude Oil Import: Narendra Modi | date= 28 January 2019 | access-date=16 December 2019 }}

Methods that have been suggested for mitigating these urban and suburban issues include the use of non-petroleum vehicles such as electric vehicles, transit-oriented development, carfree cities, bicycles, light trains, smart growth, shared space, urban consolidation, urban villages, and New Urbanism.

An economic theory that has been proposed as a remedy is the introduction of a steady state economy. Such a system could include a tax shifting from income to depleting natural resources (and pollution), as well as the limitation of advertising that stimulates demand and population growth. It could also include the institution of policies that move away from globalization and toward localization to conserve energy resources, provide local jobs, and maintain local decision-making authority. Zoning policies could be adjusted to promote resource conservation and eliminate sprawl.[http://steadystate.org/ Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy]{{Cite web |title=How to talk about the end of growth: Interview with Richard Heinberg |url=http://www.postcarbon.org/article/470476-how-to-talk-about-the-end |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120322161150/http://www.postcarbon.org/article/470476-how-to-talk-about-the-end |archive-date=22 March 2012 |access-date=3 September 2011}}

=Potential positive aspects=

It is known that the combustion of fossil fuels emits greenhouse gas emissions which cause climate change. Therefore, a reduction in oil use would be a net positive for the environment.

Permaculture sees peak oil as holding tremendous potential for positive change, assuming countries act with foresight. The rebuilding of local food networks, green energy production, and the general implementation of "energy descent culture" are argued to be ethical responses to the acknowledgment of finite fossil resources.{{cite web |url= http://www.futurescenarios.org/ |title= Future Scenarios – Introduction|access-date=13 February 2009 }}

The Transition Towns movement, started in Totnes, Devon[http://www.transitionnetwork.org/initiatives/totnes Totnes | Transition Network] and spread internationally by "The Transition Handbook" (Rob Hopkins) and Transition Network, sees the restructuring of society for more local resilience and ecological stewardship as a natural response to the combination of peak oil and climate change.{{cite web | url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGHrWPtCvg0#t=31 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211221/kGHrWPtCvg0 |archive-date=21 December 2021 |url-status=live| title=Rob Hopkins' Transition Handbook | website=YouTube |date=28 February 2008 | access-date=7 March 2011 }}{{cbignore}}

Predictions

{{Main|Predicting the timing of peak oil}}

{{See also|Hubbert peak theory}}

The idea that the rate of oil production would peak and irreversibly decline is an old one. In 1919, David White, chief geologist of the United States Geological Survey, wrote of US petroleum: "... the peak of production will soon be passed, possibly within 3 years."David White, "The unmined supply of petroleum in the United States," Transactions of the Society of Automotive Engineers, 1919, v.14, part 1, p.227. In 1953, Eugene Ayers, a researcher for Gulf Oil, projected that if US ultimate recoverable oil reserves were 100 billion barrels, then production in the US would peak no later than 1960. If ultimate recoverable were to be as high as 200 billion barrels, which he warned was wishful thinking, US peak production would come no later than 1970. Likewise for the world, he projected a peak somewhere between 1985 (one trillion barrels ultimate recoverable) and 2000 (two trillion barrels recoverable). Ayers made his projections without a mathematical model. He wrote: "But if the curve is made to look reasonable, it is quite possible to adapt mathematical expressions to it and to determine, in this way, the peak dates corresponding to various ultimate recoverable reserve numbers"Eugene Ayers,"U.S. oil outlook: how coal fits in," Coal Age, August 1953, v58 n.8 p 70–73.

By observing past discoveries and production levels, and predicting future discovery trends, the geoscientist M. King Hubbert used statistical modelling in 1956 to predict that United States oil production would peak between 1965 and 1971.{{cite conference |last=Hubbert |first=Marion King |author-link=M. King Hubbert |date=June 1956 |title=Nuclear Energy and the Fossil Fuels 'Drilling and Production Practice' |url=http://www.hubbertpeak.com/hubbert/1956/1956.pdf |conference=Spring Meeting of the Southern District. Division of Production. American Petroleum Institute |location=San Antonio, Texas |publisher=Shell Development Company |pages=22–27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080527233843/http://www.hubbertpeak.com/hubbert/1956/1956.pdf |archive-date=27 May 2008 |access-date=18 April 2008 |url-status=dead}} While this prediction held for many decades,Deffeyes, Kenneth S (2002). Hubbert's Peak: The Impending World Oil Shortage. Princeton University Press. {{ISBN|0-691-09086-6}}. more recently as of 2018 daily oil production in the United States had finally exceeded its previous peak in 1970.{{cite web |date=31 January 2018 |title=US oil production tops 10 million barrels a day for first time since 1970 |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/31/us-oil-production-tops-10-million-barrels-a-day-for-first-time-since-1970.html |access-date=24 July 2018 |website=CNBC}}{{cite web |title=New Record For US Oil Production |url=http://www.etf.com/sections/features-and-news/new-record-us-oil-production?nopaging=1 |access-date=24 July 2018 |website=ETF.com}} Hubbert used a semi-logistical curved model (sometimes incorrectly compared to a normal distribution). He assumed the production rate of a limited resource would follow a roughly symmetrical distribution. Depending on the limits of exploitability and market pressures, the rise or decline of resource production over time might be sharper or more stable, appear more linear or curved.{{cite journal |last=Brandt |first=Adam R. |date=May 2007 |title=Testing Hubbert |url=http://www.iaee.org/en/students/best_papers/Adam_Brandt.pdf |url-status=dead |journal=Energy Policy |volume=35 |issue=5 |pages=3074–3088 |doi=10.1016/j.enpol.2006.11.004 |bibcode=2007EnPol..35.3074B |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110218174342/http://www.iaee.org/en/students/best_papers/Adam_Brandt.pdf |archive-date=18 February 2011 |access-date=11 July 2009}} That model and its variants are now called Hubbert peak theory; they have been used to describe and predict the peak and decline of production from regions, countries, and multinational areas. The same theory has also been applied to other limited-resource production.

A comprehensive 2009 study of oil depletion by the UK Energy Research Centre noted:Roger Bentley et al., "Comparison of global oil supply forecasts," UK Energy Research Centre, Review of Evidence for Global Oil Depletion, Technical Rept. 7, July 2009, p.25

{{blockquote | Few analysts now adhere to a symmetrical bell-shaped production curve. This is correct, as there is no natural physical reason why the production of a resource should follow such a curve and little empirical evidence that it does. | Bentley et al. | Comparison of global oil supply forecasts}}

The report noted that Hubbert had used the logistic curve because it was mathematically convenient, not because he believed it to be literally correct. The study observed that in most cases the asymmetric exponential model provided a better fit (as in the case of Seneca cliff modelBardi, Ugo. The Seneca Effect: Why Growth is Slow But Collapse is Rapid. Springer, 2017.), and that peaks tended to occur well before half the oil had been produced, with the result that in nearly all cases, the post-peak decline was more gradual than the increase leading up to the peak.Adam Brandt, "Methods of forecasting future oil supply," UK Energy Research Centre, Review of Evidence for Global Oil Depletion, Technical Rept. 6, July 2009, p.21

= List of past predictions of peak oil =

In the 21st century, predictions of future oil production made in 2007 and 2009 stated either that the peak had already occurred,

{{cite web |author=Deffeyes, Kenneth S |author-link=Kenneth S. Deffeyes |date=19 January 2007 |title=Current Events – Join us as we watch the crisis unfolding |url=http://www.princeton.edu/hubbert/current-events.html |access-date=27 July 2008 |publisher=Princeton University: Beyond Oil}}{{cite journal |author1=Zittel, Werner |author2=Schindler, Jorg |date=October 2007 |title=Crude Oil: The Supply Outlook |url=http://www.energywatchgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/2008-02_EWG_Oil_Report_updated.pdf |url-status=dead |publisher=Energy Watch Group |id=EWG-Series No 3/2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160416060228/http://www.energywatchgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/2008-02_EWG_Oil_Report_updated.pdf |archive-date=16 April 2016 |access-date=27 July 2008}}{{cite web |author1=Kjell Aleklett |author2=Mikael Höök |author3=Kristofer Jakobsson |author4=Michael Lardelli |author5=Simon Snowden |author6=Bengt Söderbergh |date=9 November 2009 |title=The Peak of the Oil Age |url=http://www.tsl.uu.se/uhdsg/Publications/PeakOilAge.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110726171422/http://www.tsl.uu.se/uhdsg/Publications/PeakOilAge.pdf |archive-date=26 July 2011 |access-date=15 November 2009 |publisher=Energy Policy}} that oil production was on the cusp of the peak, or that it would occur soon.{{cite journal |author=Koppelaar, Rembrandt H.E.M. |date=September 2006 |title=World Production and Peaking Outlook |url=http://peakoil.nl/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/asponl_2005_report.pdf |url-status=dead |publisher=Peakoil Nederland |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080625012113/http://peakoil.nl/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/asponl_2005_report.pdf |archive-date=25 June 2008 |access-date=27 July 2008}}{{cite journal |author1=Nick A. Owen |author2=Oliver R. Inderwildi |author3=David A. King |year=2010 |title=The status of conventional world oil reserves—Hype or cause for concern? |journal=Energy Policy |volume=38 |issue=8 |page=4743 |doi=10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.026|bibcode=2010EnPol..38.4743O }} A decade later, world oil production would rise to a new all time high in 2018, as developments in extraction technology enabled a massive expansion of U.S. tight oil production.{{cite magazine |last1=Johnson |first1=Keith |date=13 September 2018 |title=Oil Production Is at Record Levels. So Why Are Oil Prices Heading Higher? |url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/09/13/oil-production-record-levels-why-are-oil-prices-heading-higher-opec-iea-venezuela-iran/ |access-date=27 December 2018 |magazine=Foreign Policy}}{{Cite web |title=How much shale (Tight) oil is produced in the United States? - FAQ - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) |url=https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=847&t=6}}

Though world oil production faltered in 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic causing significant disruptions in the oil markets, production in 2023 reached a new high of 101.73 million barrels per day in 2023.{{Cite web |title=Short-Term Energy Outlook - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) |url=https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo/report/global_oil.php |access-date=2024-01-25 |website=www.eia.gov}}{{cite web |title=INTERNATIONAL Petroleum and other liquids (US EIA) |url=https://www.eia.gov/international/data/world/petroleum-and-other-liquids/annual-petroleum-and-other-liquids-production}}

class="wikitable"

!Pub.

!Made by

!Peak year/range

!Pub.

!Made by

!Peak year/range

1972

|Esso

|About 2000

|1999

|Parker

|2040

1972

|United Nations

|By 2000

|2000

|A. A. Bartlett

|2004 or 2019

1974

|Hubbert

|1991–2000

|2000

|Duncan

|2006

1976

|UK Dep. of Energy

|About 2000

|2000

|EIA

|2021–2067; 2037 most likely

1977

|Hubbert

|1996

|2000

|EIA (WEO)

|Beyond 2020

1977

|Ehrlich, et al.

|2000

|2001

|Deffeyes

|2003–2008

1979

|Shell

|Plateau by 2004

|2001

|Goodstein

|2007

1981

|World Bank

|Plateau around 2000

|2002

|Smith

|2010–2016

1985

|J. Bookout

|2020

|2002

|Campbell

|2010

1989

|Campbell

|1989

|2002

|Cavallo

|2025–2028

1994

|L. F. Ivanhoe

|OPEC plateau 2000–2050

|2003

|Greene, et al.

|2020–2050

1995

|Petroconsultants

|2005

|2003

|Laherrère

|2010–2020

1997

|Ivanhoe

|2010

|2003

|Lynch

|No visible peak

1997

|J. D. Edwards

|2020

|2003

|Shell

|After 2025

1998

|IEA

|2014

|2003

|Simmons

|2007–2009

1998

|Campbell & Laherrère

|2004

|2004

|Bakhitari

|2006–2007

1999

|Campbell

|2010

|2004

|CERA

|After 2020

1999

|Peter Odell

|2060

|2004

|PFC Energy

|2015–2020

colspan="6" style="font-size: 8pt; text-align:left" |A selection of estimates of the year of peak world oil production, compiled by the United States Energy Information Administration. Some forecasts relate to conventional oil.

Criticisms

=General arguments=

The theory of peak oil is controversial and became an issue of political debate in the US and Europe in the mid-2000s. Critics argued that newly found oil reserves forestalled a peak oil event. Some argued that oil production from new oil reserves and existing fields will continue to increase at a rate that outpaces demand, until alternative energy sources for current fossil fuel dependence are found.{{Cite web |last=Wile |first=Rob |title=Peak Oil Is Dead |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/death-of-peak-oil-2013-3 |access-date=2023-05-17 |website=Business Insider |language=en-US}}{{cite web|url=http://news.stanford.edu/news/2013/july/peak-oil-supply-070913.html|title= Stanford researchers say 'peak oil' concerns should ease|last=Golden|first=Mark|publisher=Stanford Report|date= 9 July 2013}} In 2015, analysts in the petroleum and financial industries claimed that the "age of oil" had already reached a new stage where the excess supply that appeared in late 2014 may continue.{{cite report

|url=http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/speeches/2015/new-economics-of-oil-spencer-dale.pdf

|title= New Economics of Oil | last=Dale | first=Spencer

|publisher= BP

|date= 13 October 2015

|access-date=6 November 2015 }}{{cite news

|url = http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-08-20/optimists-were-wrong-to-predict-oil-prices-would-soon-rise-again

|title = A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to $80 Oil

|last = Shilling

|first = A. Gary

|work = Bloomberg News

|publisher = Bloomberg L.P.

|date = 20 August 2015

|access-date = 6 November 2015

|archive-date = 12 April 2016

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160412221859/http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-08-20/optimists-were-wrong-to-predict-oil-prices-would-soon-rise-again

|url-status = dead

}}

A consensus was emerging that parties to an international agreement would introduce measures to constrain the combustion of hydrocarbons in an effort to limit global temperature rise to the nominal 2 °C that scientists predicted would limit environmental harm to tolerable levels.{{cite magazine

|url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/08/24/the-weight-of-the-world

|title= The Weight of the World | last=Kolbert | first = Elizabeth

| magazine= The New Yorker |publisher= Condé Nast

|date= 24 August 2015

|access-date=6 November 2015 }}

Another argument against the peak oil theory is reduced demand from various options and technologies substituting oil.{{Cite web |last=Smith |first=Karl |title=No Peak Oil Really Is Dead |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/modeledbehavior/2013/07/17/no-peak-oil-really-is-dead/ |access-date=2023-05-17 |website=Forbes |language=en}} US federal funding to develop algae fuels increased since 2000 due to rising fuel prices."National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap" (PDF). US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Biomass Program. Retrieved 3 April 2014. Many other projects are being funded in

Australia, New Zealand, Europe, the Middle East, and elsewhere{{cite journal | last1 = Pienkos | first1 = P. T. | last2 = Darzins | first2 = A. | year = 2009 | title = The promise and challenges of microalgal-derived biofuels | url = https://zenodo.org/record/1229121| journal = Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining | volume = 3 | issue = 4| page = 431 | doi = 10.1002/bbb.159 | s2cid = 10323847 }} and private companies are entering the field.Darzins, A., 2008. Recent and current research & roadmapping activities: overview. National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap Workshop, University of Maryland.

=Oil industry representatives=

John Hofmeister, president of Royal Dutch Shell's US operations, while agreeing that conventional oil production would soon start to decline, criticized the analysis of peak oil theory by Matthew Simmons for being "overly focused on a single country: Saudi Arabia, the world's largest exporter and OPEC swing producer."{{cite web|last1=Stier|first1=Kenneth|title=The 'Peak Oil' Theory: Will Oil Reserves Run Dry?|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2008/03/20/the-peak-oil-theory-will-oil-reserves-run-dry.html|website=CNBC News|access-date=16 November 2015|date=20 March 2008}} Hofmeister pointed to the large reserves at the US outer continental shelf, which held an estimated {{convert|100|Goilbbl}} of oil and natural gas. However, only 15% of those reserves were currently exploitable, a good part of that off the coasts of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama.

Hofmeister also pointed to unconventional sources of oil such as the oil sands of Canada, where Shell was active. The Canadian oil sands—a natural combination of sand, water, and oil found largely in Alberta and Saskatchewan—are believed to contain one trillion barrels of oil. Another trillion barrels are also said to be trapped in rocks in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming,{{cite web

|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2008/03/20/the-peak-oil-theory-will-oil-reserves-run-dry.html

|title=The 'Peak Oil' Theory: Will Oil Reserves Run Dry? |author=Kenneth Stier

|publisher=CNBC |date=20 March 2008 |access-date=26 April 2011}} in the form of oil shale. Environmentalists argue that major environmental, social, and economic obstacles would make extracting oil from these areas excessively difficult.{{cite web

|url=http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/12/after_the_tar_s.php

|title=A Return To Colorado Oil Shale?

|publisher=TreeHugger

|author=John Laumer

|date=26 December 2007

|access-date=8 May 2008

|archive-date=13 July 2011

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110713105119/http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/12/after_the_tar_s.php

|url-status=dead

}} Hofmeister argued that if oil companies were allowed to drill more in the United States enough to produce another {{convert|2|Moilbbl/d}}, oil and gas prices would not be as high as they were in the late 2000s. He thought in 2008 that high energy prices would cause social unrest similar to the 1992 Rodney King riots.{{cite web

|url=http://www.charlierose.com/shows/2008/03/25/1/a-conversation-with-john-hofmeister

|author=Charlie Rose

|author-link=Charlie Rose

|title=A conversation with John Hofmeister

|publisher=PBS

|access-date=29 March 2008

|archive-date=17 October 2008

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081017135852/http://www.charlierose.com/shows/2008/03/25/1/a-conversation-with-john-hofmeister

|url-status=dead

}}

In 2009, Dr. Christof Rühl, chief economist of BP, argued against the peak oil

hypothesis:{{cite web

|url=https://www.euractiv.de/section/energie-und-umwelt/interview/bp-preisschwankungen-werden-wahrscheinlich-zunehmen/

|title=BP: Preisschwankungen werden wahrscheinlich zunehmenen, Interview (in English) mit Dr. Christof Rühl, Mittwoch 1

|date=October 2008

|publisher=Euractiv

|access-date=11 July 2009}}

{{blockquote |

Physical peak oil, which I have no reason to accept as a valid statement either on theoretical, scientific or ideological grounds, would be insensitive to prices. ... In fact the whole hypothesis of peak oil – which is that there is a certain amount of oil in the ground, consumed at a certain rate, and then it's finished – does not react to anything ... Therefore there will never be a moment when the world runs out of oil because there will always be a price at which the last drop of oil can clear the market. And you can turn anything into oil if you are willing to pay the financial and environmental price ... (Global Warming) is likely to be more of a natural limit than all these peak oil theories combined. ... Peak oil has been predicted for 150 years. It has never happened, and it will stay this way. |

Dr. Christof Rühl | BP

}}

Rühl argued that the main limitations for oil availability are "above ground" factors such as the availability of staff, expertise, technology, investment security, funds, and global warming, and that the oil question was about price and not the physical availability.

In 2008, Daniel Yergin of CERA suggest that a recent high price phase might add to a future demise of the oil industry, not of complete exhaustion of resources or an apocalyptic shock but the timely and smooth setup of alternatives.Financial Times Germany, 29 May 2008 Daniel Yergin: Öl am Wendepunkt (Oil at the turning point) Yergin went on to say, "This is the fifth time that the world is said to be running out of oil. Each time-whether it was the 'gasoline famine' at the end of WWI or the 'permanent shortage' of the 1970s-technology and the opening of new frontier areas have banished the spectre of decline. There's no reason to think that technology is finished this time."{{cite book |last1=Al-Naimi |first1=Ali |title=Out of the Desert |date=2016 |publisher=Portfolio Penguin |location=Great Britain |isbn=9780241279250 |pages=244–246}}

In 2006, Clive Mather, CEO of Shell Canada, said the Earth's supply of bitumen hydrocarbons was "almost infinite", referring to hydrocarbons in oil sands.{{cite web

|url=https://abcnews.go.com/2020/Stossel/story?id=1954572

|title=Myth: The World Is Running Out of Oil

|publisher=ABC News

|date=12 May 2006

|access-date=26 April 2011}}

=Others=

In 2006 attorney and mechanical engineer Peter W. Huber asserted that the world was just running out of "cheap oil", explaining that as oil prices rise, unconventional sources become economically viable. He predicted that, "[t]he tar sands of Alberta alone contain enough hydrocarbon to fuel the entire planet for over 100 years."

Environmental journalist George Monbiot responded to a 2012 report by Leonardo MaugeriMaugeri, Leonardo. [http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/files/Oil-%20The%20Next%20Revolution.pdf "Oil: The Next Revolution" Discussion Paper 2012–10], Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, June 2012. Retrieved 13 July 2012. by suggesting that there is more than enough oil (from unconventional sources) to "deep-fry" the world with climate change.Monbiot, George. [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jul/02/peak-oil-we-we-wrong "We were wrong on peak oil. There's enough to fry us all"] The Guardian, 2 July 2012. Retrieved 13 July 2012. Stephen Sorrell, senior lecturer Science and Technology Policy Research, Sussex Energy Group, and lead author of the UKERC Global Oil Depletion report, and Christophe McGlade, doctoral researcher at the UCL Energy Institute have criticized Maugeri's assumptions about decline rates.Mearns, Euan. [http://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/A-Critical-Appraisal-of-Leonardo-Maugeris-Decline-Rate-Assumptions.html: "A Critical Appraisal of Leonardo Maugeri's Decline Rate Assumptions"] The Oil Drum, 10 July 2012.

See also

Notes

{{reflist|group=note}}

Citations

{{reflist|30em|refs=}}

Further information

=Books=

  • {{Cite book |author=Aleklett, Kjel |title=Peeking at Peak Oil|year=2012 |isbn=978-1-4614-3423-8|publisher=Springer Science }}
  • {{Cite book |author=Campbell, Colin J. |title=The Essence of Oil & Gas Depletion |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-906522-19-6|publisher=Multi-Science Publishing |author-link=Colin J. Campbell}}
  • Campbell, Colin J. (2005). Oil Crisis Multi-Science Publishing.
  • Campbell, Colin J. (2013). Campbell's Atlas of Oil and Gas Depletion {{ISBN|978-1-4614-3576-1}}
  • {{Cite book |author=Deffeyes, Kenneth S. |title=Hubbert's Peak: The Impending World Oil Shortage |isbn=978-0-691-09086-3 |year=2002 |publisher=Princeton University Press |author-link=Kenneth S. Deffeyes}}
  • {{Cite book |author=Deffeyes, Kenneth S. |title=Beyond Oil: The View from Hubbert's Peak |isbn=978-0-8090-2956-3 |year=2005 |publisher=Hill and Wang|title-link=Beyond Oil }}
  • {{Cite book |author=Goodstein David |isbn=978-0-393-05857-4 |year=2005 |title=Out of Gas: The End of the Age of Oil |series=AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts |volume=2004 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/outofgasendofage00good/page/ U21B–03] |publisher=WW Norton |author-link=David Goodstein |title-link=Out of Gas: The End of the Age of Oil |bibcode=2004AGUFM.U21B..03G }}
  • {{Cite book |author=Greer, John M. |title=The Long Descent: A User's Guide to the End of the Industrial Age |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-865-71609-4 |publisher=New Society Publishers |author-link=John Michael Greer}}
  • {{Cite book |author=Greer, John M. |title=Not the Future We Ordered: The Psychology of Peak Oil and the Myth of Eternal Progress|year=2013 |isbn=978-1-78049-088-5 |publisher=Karnac Books}}
  • {{Cite book |author=Herold, D. M. |title=Peak Oil |year=2012 |isbn=978-3-8448-0097-5|publisher=Hurstelung und Verlag}}
  • {{Cite book |author=Heinberg, Richard |title=The Party's Over: Oil, War, and the Fate of Industrial Societies|isbn=978-0-86571-482-3 |year=2003 |publisher=New Society Publishers |author-link=Richard Heinberg|title-link=The Party's Over: Oil, War, and the Fate of Industrial Societies}}
  • {{Cite book |author=Heinberg, Richard |title=Power Down: Options and Actions for a Post-Carbon World |isbn=978-0-86571-510-3 |year=2004 |publisher=New Society Publishers|title-link=Power Down: Options and Actions for a Post-Carbon World }}
  • {{Cite book |author=Heinberg, Richard |title=The Oil Depletion Protocol: A Plan to Avert Oil Wars, Terrorism and Economic Collapse |isbn=978-0-86571-563-9 |year=2006 |publisher=New Society Publishers |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/oildepletionprot0000hein }}
  • {{Cite book |author1=Heinberg, Richard |author2=Lerch, Daniel |name-list-style=amp |title= The Post Carbon Reader: Managing the 21st Century's Sustainability Crises |year=2010 |isbn=978-0-9709500-6-2|publisher=Watershed Media }}
  • Herberg, Mikkal (2014). Energy Security and the Asia-Pacific: Course Reader. United States: The National Bureau of Asian Research.
  • {{Cite book |author=Huber, Peter |title=The Bottomless Well |publisher=Basic Books |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-465-03116-0 |url=https://archive.org/details/bottomlesswelltw00hube }}
  • {{Cite book |author=Kunstler James H. |title=The Long Emergency: Surviving the End of the Oil Age, Climate Change, and Other Converging Catastrophes |isbn=978-0-87113-888-0 |year=2005 |publisher=Atlantic Monthly Press |author-link=James Howard Kunstler|title-link=The Long Emergency }}
  • {{Cite book |author=Leggett Jeremy K. |title=The Empty Tank: Oil, Gas, Hot Air, and the Coming Financial Catastrophe |isbn=978-1-4000-6527-1 |year=2005 |publisher=Random House |author-link=Jeremy Leggett |url=https://archive.org/details/emptytankoilgash00legg }}
  • {{Cite book |author=Leggett, Jeremy K. |title=Half Gone: Oil, Gas, Hot Air and the Global Energy Crisis |isbn=978-1-84627-004-8 |year=2005 |publisher=Portobello Books}}
  • {{Cite book|author=Lovins Amory |title=Winning the Oil Endgame: Innovation for Profit, Jobs and Security |year=2005|isbn=978-1-881071-10-5|publisher=Rocky Mountain Institute|display-authors=etal|title-link=Winning the Oil Endgame |author-link=Amory Lovins }}
  • {{Cite book|title=The End of the Oil Age |year=2004 |author=Pfeiffer Dale Allen |publisher=Lulu Press |isbn=978-1-4116-0629-6}}
  • {{Cite book |author=Newman Sheila |title=The Final Energy Crisis|edition=2nd|year=2008|isbn=978-0-7453-2717-4|oclc=228370383|publisher=Pluto Press}}
  • {{Cite book | author=Roberts Paul | title=The End of Oil. On the Edge of a Perilous New World | location=Boston | publisher=Houghton Mifflin | year=2004 | isbn=978-0-618-23977-1 | author-link=Paul Roberts (author)| title-link=The End of Oil }}
  • {{Cite book|author=Ruppert Michael C | title=Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil |year=2005 |publisher=New Society |isbn=978-0-86571-540-0 |author-link=Michael Ruppert}}
  • {{Cite book|title=Twilight in the Desert: The Coming Saudi Oil Shock and the World Economy|author=Simmons Matthew R|isbn=978-0-471-73876-3|year=2005|publisher=Wiley & Sons|location=Hoboken, N.J.|author-link=Matthew R. Simmons|url=https://archive.org/details/twilightindesert00simm_0}}
  • {{Cite book |author=Simon Julian L | title=The Ultimate Resource | isbn=978-0-691-00381-8 | publisher=Princeton University Press|year=1998 |author-link=Julian Lincoln Simon}}
  • {{Cite book |author=Schneider-Mayerson Matthew |title=Peak Oil: Apocalyptic Environmentalism and Libertarian Political Culture |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=2015 |isbn=978-0-226-28543-6}}
  • {{Cite book |author1=Stansberry Mark A |author2=Reimbold Jason |title=The Braking Point |publisher=Hawk Publishing |year=2008 |isbn=978-1-930709-67-6}}
  • {{Cite book |author=Tertzakian Peter |isbn=978-0-07-146874-9 |title=A Thousand Barrels a Second |publisher=McGraw-Hill |year=2006 |author-link=Peter Tertzakian |url=https://archive.org/details/thousandbarrelss00tert }}
  • {{Cite book |author=Vassiliou, Marius |author-link= Marius Vassiliou |isbn=978-0-8108-5993-7 |title=Historical Dictionary of the Petroleum Industry|publisher=Scarecrow Press (Rowman & Littlefield)|year=2009}}

=Articles=

  • {{cite journal |last1=Bardi |first1=Ugo |title=Peak oil, 20 years later: Failed prediction or useful insight? |journal=Energy Research & Social Science |date=2019 |volume=48 |pages=257–261 |doi=10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.022 |doi-access=free}}
  • {{Cite news |url=https://money.cnn.com/2005/12/07/markets/peak_oil/index.htm |title=Lawmakers: Will we run out of oil? |date=7 December 2005 |author=Benner, Katie |publisher=CNN}}
  • {{Cite news |url=https://money.cnn.com/2004/11/02/markets/peak_oil/ |title=Oil: Is the end at hand? |date=3 November 2004 |author=Benner, Katie |publisher=CNN}}
  • {{cite journal |url=http://dieoff.org/page140.htm |title=The end of cheap oil |author=Colin, Campbell, Laherrère Jean |journal=Scientific American |volume=278 |issue=3 |pages=78–83 |bibcode=1998SciAm.278c..78C |year=1998 |doi=10.1038/scientificamerican0398-78 |access-date=2 May 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927012357/http://dieoff.org/page140.htm |archive-date=27 September 2007 |url-status=dead |url-access=subscription }}
  • [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267748678_Some_behavioral_aspects_of_energy_descent_How_a_biophysical_psychology_might_help_people_transition_through_the_lean_times_ahead De Young, R. (2014). "Some behavioral aspects of energy descent." Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1255).]
  • {{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4077802.stm |title='Peak oil' enters mainstream debate |work=BBC News | date=10 June 2005 | access-date=26 March 2010| first=Adam| last=Porter}}
  • {{cite magazine |url=http://www.fastcompany.com/1725372/wikileaks-may-have-just-confirmed-the-existence-of-peak-oil |title=WikiLeaks May Have Just Confirmed That Peak Oil Is Imminent |magazine=Fast Company |author= Ariel Schwartz |date=9 February 2011}}
  • {{Cite news |url=https://scholarship.rice.edu/bitstream/handle/1911/72185/Schneider-Mayerson,%20From%20Politics%20to%20Prophecy.pdf?sequence=1 |title=From politics to prophecy: environmental quiescence and the peak-oil movement |date=2013 |author=Matthew Schneider-Mayerson |publisher=Environmental Politics}}

=Documentary films=

=Podcasts=

  • [https://energyx.org/saudi-america/ Saudi America? – The U.S. Oil Boom in Perspective]
  • [http://kunstler.com/podcast/kunstlercast-275-art-berman-clarifies-whatever-happened-to-peak-oil/ KunstlerCast 275 — Art Berman Clarifies Whatever Happened to Peak Oil] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230331060711/http://kunstler.com/podcast/kunstlercast-275-art-berman-clarifies-whatever-happened-to-peak-oil/ |date=31 March 2023 }}