Sea spider

File:Callipallene brevirostris (YPM IZ 077244) 003.jpeg]]

Many sea spiders are recognised by their enormous walking legs in contrast to a reduced body region, resulting into the so-called "all legs" or "no body" appearance. The body segments (somites) are generally interpreted as three main sections (tagma): cephalon (head, aka cephalosoma), trunk (aka thorax) and abdomen. However, the definition of cephalon and trunk might differ between literature (see text), and some studies might follow a prosoma (=cephalon+trunk)–opisthosoma (=abdomen) definition, aligning to the tagmosis of other chelicerates.{{Cite journal |last1=Vilpoux |first1=Kathia |last2=Waloszek |first2=Dieter |date=2003-12-01 |title=Larval development and morphogenesis of the sea spider Pycnogonum litorale (Ström, 1762) and the tagmosis of the body of Pantopoda |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1467803903001154 |journal=Arthropod Structure & Development |volume=32 |issue=4 |pages=349–383 |doi=10.1016/j.asd.2003.09.004 |pmid=18089018 |bibcode=2003ArtSD..32..349V |issn=1467-8039|url-access=subscription }} The exoskeleton of the body is tube-like, lacking the dorsoventral division (tergite and sternite) seen in most other arthropods.{{Cite journal |last1=Dunlop |first1=Jason A. |last2=Lamsdell |first2=James C. |date=2017 |title=Segmentation and tagmosis in Chelicerata |url=https://www.academia.edu/28212892 |journal=Arthropod Structure & Development |volume=46 |issue=3 |pages=395–418 |doi=10.1016/j.asd.2016.05.002 |pmid=27240897 |bibcode=2017ArtSD..46..395D |issn=1467-8039}}

20200205 Pycnogonida Pantopoda morphology.png|Generalized morphology of a pantopod pycnogonid

1937 Smithsonian miscellaneous collections Snodgrass 1936 p24 Fig. 07.jpg|Ventral view and leg base of Chaetonymphon spinosum

The cephalon is formed by the fusion of ocular somite and four anterior segments behind it (somite 1–4). It consists of an anterior proboscis, a dorsal ocular tubercle with eyes, and up to four pairs of appendages (chelifores, palps, {{linktext|oviger}}s and first walking legs). Although some literature might consider the segment carrying the first walking leg (somite 4) to be part of the trunk, it is completely fused to the remaining head section to form a single cephalic tagma. The proboscis has three-fold symmetry, terminating with a typically Y-shaped mouth (vertical slit in Austrodecidae{{Cite journal |last1=Arango |first1=Claudia P. |last2=Wheeler |first2=Ward C. |date=2007 |title=Phylogeny of the sea spiders (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) based on direct optimization of six loci and morphology |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00143.x |journal=Cladistics |language=en |volume=23 |issue=3 |pages=255–293 |doi=10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00143.x |pmid=34905863 |issn=0748-3007}}). It usually has fairly limited dorsoventral and lateral movement. However, in those species that have reduced chelifores and palps, the proboscis is well developed and flexible, often equipped with numerous sensory bristles and strong rasping ridges around the mouth.{{Cite journal |last1=Wagner |first1=Philipp |last2=Dömel |first2=Jana S. |last3=Hofmann |first3=Michaela |last4=Hübner |first4=Jeremy |last5=Leese |first5=Florian |last6=Melzer |first6=Roland R. |date=2017-03-01 |title=Comparative study of bisected proboscides of Pycnogonida |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13127-016-0310-6 |journal=Organisms Diversity & Evolution |language=en |volume=17 |issue=1 |pages=121–135 |doi=10.1007/s13127-016-0310-6 |bibcode=2017ODivE..17..121W |issn=1618-1077|url-access=subscription }} The proboscis is unique to pycnogonids, and its exact homology with other arthropod mouthparts is enigmatic, as well as its relationship with the absence of labrum (preoral upper lip of ocular somite) in pycnogonid itself. The ocular tubercle has up to two pairs of simple eyes (ocelli) on it, though sometimes the eyes can be reduced or missing, especially among species living in the deep oceans. All of the eyes are median eyes in origin, homologous to the median ocelli of other arthropods, while the lateral eyes (e.g. compound eyes) found in most other arthropods are completely absent.{{Cite journal |last1=Miether |first1=Sebastian T. |last2=Dunlop |first2=Jason A. |date=2016 |title=Lateral eye evolution in the arachnids |url=http://www.bioone.org/doi/10.13156/arac.2006.17.2.103 |journal=Arachnology |language=en |volume=17 |issue=2 |pages=103–119 |doi=10.13156/arac.2006.17.2.103 |issn=2050-9928|url-access=subscription }}

Pseudopallene pachycheira.jpeg|Pseudopallene pachycheira, showing robust chelifores and the absence of palps.

Pycnogonum littorale (YPM IZ 030249).jpeg|Pycnogonum litorale, showing the absence of both chelifores and palps. Ovigers are absent in female.

Colossendeis (MNHN-IU-2013-2065).jpeg|Colossendeis sp., showing the absence of chelifores but otherwise elongated proboscis, palps and ovigers.

Nymphon maculatum 2011-721 (1) (cropped).jpg|Nymphon maculatum, showing the presence of both chelifores, palps and ovigers.

In adult pycnogonids, the chelifores (aka cheliphore), palps and ovigers (aka ovigerous legs{{Cite journal |last1=Bain |first1=Bonnie A. |last2=Govedich |first2=Fredric R. |date=2004 |title=Courtship and mating behavior in the Pycnogonida (Chelicerata: Class Pycnogonida): a summary |url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07924259.2004.9652607 |journal=Invertebrate Reproduction & Development |language=en |volume=46 |issue=1 |pages=63–79 |doi=10.1080/07924259.2004.9652607 |bibcode=2004InvRD..46...63B |issn=0792-4259|url-access=subscription }}) are variably reduced or absent, depending on taxa and sometimes sex. Nymphonidae is the only family where all of three pairs are always functional. The ovigers can be reduced or missing in females, but are present in almost all males.[https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/38/2/686/5904272?login=false Phylogenomic Resolution of Sea Spider Diversification through Integration of Multiple Data Classes] In a functional condition, the chelifores terminate with a pincer (chela) formed by two segments (podomeres), like the chelicerae of most other chelicerates. The scape (peduncle) behind the pincer is usually unsegmented, but could be bisegmented in some species, resulting into a total of three or four chelifore segments.{{Cite journal |last1=Siveter |first1=Derek J. |last2=Sutton |first2=Mark D. |last3=Briggs |first3=Derek E. G. |last4=Siveter |first4=David J. |date=2004 |title=A Silurian sea spider |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/nature02928 |journal=Nature |language=en |volume=431 |issue=7011 |pages=978–980 |doi=10.1038/nature02928 |pmid=15496921 |bibcode=2004Natur.431..978S |issn=1476-4687|url-access=subscription }} The palps and ovigers have up to 9 and 10 segments respectively, but can have fewer even when in a functional condition.{{Cite journal |last1=Cano-Sánchez |first1=Esperanza |last2=López-González |first2=Pablo J. |date=2016-12-15 |title=Basal articulation of the palps and ovigers in Antarctic Colossendeis (Pycnogonida; Colossendeidae) |journal=Helgoland Marine Research |volume=70 |issue=1 |pages=22 |doi=10.1186/s10152-016-0474-7 |doi-access=free |issn=1438-3888}}{{Cite journal |last1=Sabroux |first1=Romain |last2=Edgecombe |first2=Gregory D. |last3=Pisani |first3=Davide |last4=Garwood |first4=Russell J. |date=2023 |title=New insights into the sea spider fauna (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) of La Voulte-sur-Rhône, France (Jurassic, Callovian) |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/spp2.1515 |journal=Papers in Palaeontology |language=en |volume=9 |issue=4 |pages=e1515 |doi=10.1002/spp2.1515 |bibcode=2023PPal....9E1515S |issn=2056-2802}} The palps are rather featureless and never have claws in adult Pantopoda, while the ovigers may or may not possess a terminal claw and rows of specialised spines on its curved distal segments (strigilis). The chelifores are used for feeding and the palps are used for sensing and manipulating food items,{{Cite journal |last1=Dietz |first1=Lars |last2=Dömel |first2=Jana S. |last3=Leese |first3=Florian |last4=Lehmann |first4=Tobias |last5=Melzer |first5=Roland R. |date=2018-03-15 |title=Feeding ecology in sea spiders (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida): what do we know? |journal=Frontiers in Zoology |volume=15 |issue=1 |pages=7 |doi=10.1186/s12983-018-0250-4 |doi-access=free |issn=1742-9994 |pmc=5856303 |pmid=29568315}} while the ovigers are used for cleaning themselves, with the additional function of carrying offspring in males.

File:1909 The Cambridge natural history volume IV p531 Fig. 282.jpg australis, showing 10 legs and four-segmented chelifores (upper left).]]

File:1909 The Cambridge natural history volume IV p509 Fig. 274.jpg

File:NMNH-Sexanymphon mirabilis1-000001.jpg mirabilis, a species with six pairs of legs]]

The leg-bearing somites (somite 4 and all trunk somites, the alternatively defined "trunk/thorax") are either segmented or fused to each other, carrying the walking legs via a series of lateral processes (lateral tubular extension of the somites). In most species, the legs are much larger than the body in both length and volume, only being shorter and more slender than the body in Rhynchothoracidae. Each leg is typically composed of eight tubular segments, commonly known as coxa 1, 2 and 3, femur, tibia 1 and 2, tarsus, and propodus. This terminology, with three coxae, no trochanter, and using the term "propodus", is unusual for arthropods. However, based on muscular system and serial homology to the podomeres of other chelicerates, they are most likely coxa (=coxa 1), trochanter (=coxa 2), prefemur/basifemur (=coxa 3), postfemur/telofemur (=femur), patella (=tibia 1), tibia (tibia 2) and two tarsomeres (=tarsus and propodus) in origin.{{Cite journal |last=Shultz |first=Jeffrey W. |date=1989 |title=Morphology of locomotor appendages in Arachnida: evolutionary trends and phylogenetic implications |url=https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1989.tb00552.x |journal=Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society |language=en |volume=97 |issue=1 |pages=1–55 |doi=10.1111/j.1096-3642.1989.tb00552.x|url-access=subscription }} The leg segmentation of Paleozoic taxa is a bit different, noticeably they have annulated coxa 1 and are further divided into two types: one with flattened distal (femur and beyond) segments and first leg pair with one less segment than the other leg pairs (e.g. Palaeoisopus, Haliestes), and another one with an immobile joint between the apparently fourth and fifth segment which altogether might represent a divided femur (e.g. Palaeopantopus, Flagellopantopus). Each leg terminates with a main claw (aka pretarsus/apotele, the true terminal segment), which may or may not have a pair of auxiliary claws on its base. Most of the joints move vertically, except the joint between coxa 1–2 (coxa-trochanter joint) which provide lateral mobility (promotor-remotor motion), and the joint between tarsus and propodus did not have muscles, just like the subdivided tarsus of other arthropods. There are usually eight (four pairs) legs in total, but a few species have five to six pairs. These are known as polymerous (i.e., extra-legged) species, which are distributed among six genera in the families Pycnogonidae (five pairs in Pentapycnon), Colossendeidae (five pairs in Decolopoda and Pentacolossendeis, six pairs in Dodecolopoda) and Nymphonidae (five pairs in Pentanymphon, six pairs in Sexanymphon).{{cite book |last=Ruppert |first=Edward E. |year=1994 |title=Invertebrate Zoology |edition=6th |others=Barnes, Robert D. |place=Fort Worth, TX |publisher=Saunders College Pub |isbn=0-03-026668-8 |language=English |oclc=30544625 |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/30544625}}{{cite encyclopedia |last=Crooker |first=Allen |title=Sea Spiders (Pycnogonida) |year=2008 |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Entomology |pages=3321–3335 |editor-last=Capinera |editor-first=John L. |place=Dordrecht, NL |publisher=Springer Netherlands |lang=en |doi=10.1007/978-1-4020-6359-6_4098 |isbn=978-1-4020-6359-6 }}

Several alternatives had been proposed for the position homology of pycnogonid appendages, such as chelifores being protocerebral/homologous to the labrum (see text) or ovigers being duplicated palps.{{Cite journal |last1=Manuel |first1=Michaël |last2=Jager |first2=Muriel |last3=Murienne |first3=Jérôme |last4=Clabaut |first4=Céline |last5=Guyader |first5=Hervé Le |date=2006-07-01 |title=Hox genes in sea spiders (Pycnogonida) and the homology of arthropod head segments |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00427-006-0095-2 |journal=Development Genes and Evolution |language=en |volume=216 |issue=7 |pages=481–491 |doi=10.1007/s00427-006-0095-2 |pmid=16820954 |issn=1432-041X|url-access=subscription }} Conclusively, the classic, morphology-based one-by-one alingment to the prosomal appendages of other chelicerates was confirm by both neuroanatomic and genetic evidences. Noticeably, the order of pycnogonid leg pairs are mismatched to those of other chelicerates, starting from the ovigers which are homologous to the first leg pair of arachnids. While the fourth walking leg pair was considered aligned to the variably reduced first opisthosomal segment (somite 7, also counted as part of the prosoma based on different studies and/or taxa) of euchelicerates, the origin of the additional fifth and sixth leg pairs in the polymerous species are still enigmatic. Together with the cephalic position of the first walking legs, the anterior and posterior boundary of pycnogonid leg pairs are not aligned to those of euchelicerate prosoma and opisthosoma, nor the cephalon and trunk of pycnogonid itself.

The abdomen (aka trunk end) does not have any appendages. In Pantopoda it is also called the anal tubercle, which is always unsegmented, highly reduced and almost vestigial, simply terminated by the anus. It is considered to be a remnant of opisthosoma/trunk of other chelicerates, but it is unknown which somite (s) it actually aligned to. So far only Paleozoic species have segmented abdomens (at least up to four segments, presumably somite 8–11 which aligned to opisthosomal segment 2–5 of euchelicerates), with some of them even terminated by a long telson (tail).{{Cite journal |last1=Bergström |first1=Jan |last2=Stürmer |first2=Wilhelm |last3=Winter |first3=Gerhard |date=1980 |title=Palaeoisopus, Palaeopantopus and Palaeothea, pycnogonid arthropods from the Lower Devonian Hunsriick Slate, West Germany |url=https://www.academia.edu/5146832 |journal=Paläontologische Zeitschrift |volume=54 |issue=1–2 |pages=7 |doi=10.1007/BF02985882 |bibcode=1980PalZ...54....7B |issn=0031-0220}}{{Cite journal |last1=Poschmann |first1=Markus |last2=Dunlop |first2=Jason A. |date=2006 |title=A New Sea Spider (arthropoda: Pycnogonida) with a Flagelliform telson from the Lower Devonian Hunsrück Slate, Germany |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00583.x |journal=Palaeontology |language=en |volume=49 |issue=5 |pages=983–989 |doi=10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00583.x |bibcode=2006Palgy..49..983P |issn=1475-4983}}

File:20200208 Pycnogonida Pantopoda digestive system.png

File:Ammothella longipes (10.3897-zse.90.7520) Figure 3 (cropped).jpg

File:Pycnogonida anatomy - tagged.png|Sagittal section of an ascorhynchid pycnogonid, showing pharynx (F), mid gut (H) and central nervous system (B).

Pycnogonida anatomy tagged.png|Transverse section of a pycnogonid leg, showing gut diverticulum (C, D) and gonad (E)

A striking feature of pycnogonid anatomy is the distribution of their digestive and reproductive systems. The pharynx inside the proboscis is lined by dense setae, which is possibly related to their feeding behaviour. A pair of gonads (ovaries in female, testes in male) is located dorsally in relation to the digestive tract, but the majority of these organs are branched diverticula throughout the legs because the body is too small to accommodate all of them alone. The midgut diverticula are very long, usually reaching beyond the femur (variably down to tibia 2, tarsus or propodus) of each leg, except in Rhynchothoracidae where they only reach coxa 1. Some species have additional branches (in some Pycnogonum) or irregular pouches (in Endeis) on the diverticula. There is also a pair of anterior diverticula which corresponds to the chelifores or is inserted into the proboscis in some chelifores-less species. The palps and ovigers never contain diverticula, although some might possess a pair of small diverticula near the bases of these appendages. The gonad diverticula (pedal gonad) reach each femur and open via a gonopore located at coxa 2.{{Cite journal |last1=Alexeeva |first1=Nina |last2=Tamberg |first2=Yuta |date=2023-09-01 |title=Ultrastructure of the female pedal gonad in Phoxichilidium femoratum (Chelicerata, Pycnogonida) |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1467803923000622 |journal=Arthropod Structure & Development |volume=76 |pages=101295 |doi=10.1016/j.asd.2023.101295 |pmid=37722770 |bibcode=2023ArtSD..7601295A |issn=1467-8039|doi-access=free }} The structure and number of the gonopores might differ between sexes (e.g. larger in female, variably absent at the anterior legs of some male). In males, the femur or both femur and tibia 1 possess cement glands.

Pycnogonids do not require a traditional respiratory system (e.g. gills). Instead, gasses are absorbed by the legs via the non-calcareous, porous exoskeleton and transferred through the body by diffusion.{{Cite journal |last1=Lane |first1=Steven J. |last2=Moran |first2=Amy L. |last3=Shishido |first3=Caitlin M. |last4=Tobalske |first4=Bret W. |last5=Woods |first5=H. Arthur |date=2018-01-01 |title=Cuticular gas exchange by Antarctic sea spiders |url=https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/doi/10.1242/jeb.177568/263002/Cuticular-gas-exchange-by-Antarctic-sea-spiders |journal=Journal of Experimental Biology |volume=221 |issue=8 |pages=jeb177568 |language=en |doi=10.1242/jeb.177568 |issn=1477-9145}} The morphology of pycnogonid creates an efficient surface-area-to-volume ratio for respiration to occur through direct diffusion. Oxygen is absorbed by the legs and is transported via the hemolymph to the rest of the body with an open circulatory system. The small, long, thin pycnogonid heart beats vigorously at 90 to 180 beats per minute, creating substantial blood pressure. The beating of the heart drives circulation in the trunk and in the part of the legs closest to the trunk, but is not important for the circulation in the rest of the legs.{{Cite journal |last1=Woods |first1=H. Arthur |last2=Lane |first2=Steven J. |last3=Shishido |first3=Caitlin |last4=Tobalske |first4=Bret W. |last5=Arango |first5=Claudia P. |last6=Moran |first6=Amy L. |date=2017-07-10 |title=Respiratory gut peristalsis by sea spiders |url= |journal=Current Biology|language=en |volume=27 |issue=13 |pages=R638–R639 |doi=10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.062 |issn=0960-9822 |pmid=28697358|pmc= |s2cid=35014992 |doi-access=free |bibcode=2017CBio...27.R638W }} Hemolymph circulation in the legs is mostly driven by the peristaltic movement of the gut diverticula that extend into every leg, a process called gut peristalsis.{{cite journal | pmc=5344685 | year=2017 | last1=Bastide | first1=A. | last2=Peretti | first2=D. | last3=Knight | first3=J. R. | last4=Grosso | first4=S. | last5=Spriggs | first5=R. V. | last6=Pichon | first6=X. | last7=Sbarrato | first7=T. | last8=Roobol | first8=A. | last9=Roobol | first9=J. | last10=Vito | first10=D. | last11=Bushell | first11=M. | last12=von Der Haar | first12=T. | last13=Smales | first13=C. M. | last14=Mallucci | first14=G. R. | last15=Willis | first15=A. E. | title=RTN3 is a Novel Cold-Induced Protein and Mediates Neuroprotective Effects of RBM3 | journal=Current Biology | volume=27 | issue=5 | pages=638–650 | doi=10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.047 | pmid=28238655 | bibcode=2017CBio...27..638B }} In the case of taxa without a heart (e.g. Pycnogonidae), the whole circulatory system is presumed to be solely maintained by gut peristalsis.

The central nervous system of pycnogonid largely retains a segmented ladder-like structure. It consists of a dorsal brain (supraesophageal ganglion) and a pair of ventral nerve cords, intercepted by the esophagus. The former is a fusion of the first and second brain segments (cerebral ganglia)—protocererum and deutocerebrum—corresponding to the eyes/ocular somite and chelifores/somite 1 respectively. The whole section was rotated during pycnogonid evolution, as the protocerebrum went upward and the deutocerebrum shifted forward. The third commissure is established inferior to the esophagus.{{cite journal|title=Neuroanatomy of sea spiders implies an appendicular origin of the protocerebral segment|journal=Nature|year=2005|volume=437|pages=1144-1148|doi=10.1038/nature03984|last1=Maxmen|first1=Amy|last2=Browne|first2=William E.|last3=Martindale|first3=Mark Q.|last4=Giribet|first4=Gonzalo}} This third brain segment, or tritocerebrum (corresponding to the palps/somite 2), is fused to the oviger/somite 3 ganglia instead, which is followed up by the final ovigeral somata in the protonymphon larva of Pycnogonum litorale. A series of leg ganglia (somite 4 and so on) develop as molts progress,{{cite journal|title=Postembryonic development of pycnogonids: A deeper look inside|last1=Alexeevna|first1=Nina|last2=Tamberg|first2=Yuta|last3=Shunatova|first3=Natalia|journal=Arthropod Structure & Development|volume=47|issue=3|pages=299-317|year=2018|doi=10.1016/j.asd.2018.03.002}} with incorporation of the first leg ganglia into the subesophageal ganglia in certain taxa.{{Cite journal |last1=Frankowski |first1=Karina |last2=Miyazaki |first2=Katsumi |last3=Brenneis |first3=Georg |date=2022-03-31 |title=A microCT-based atlas of the central nervous system and midgut in sea spiders (Pycnogonida) sheds first light on evolutionary trends at the family level |journal=Frontiers in Zoology |volume=19 |issue=1 |pages=14 |doi=10.1186/s12983-022-00459-8 |doi-access=free |issn=1742-9994 |pmc=8973786 |pmid=35361245}} The leg ganglia might shift anteriorly or even cluster together, but are never highly fused into the ring-like synganglion of other chelicerates. The abdominal ganglia are vestigal, absorbed by the preceding leg ganglia during juvenile development.{{Cite journal |last1=Brenneis |first1=Georg |last2=Scholtz |first2=Gerhard |date=2014-04-15 |title=The 'Ventral Organs' of Pycnogonida (Arthropoda) Are Neurogenic Niches of Late Embryonic and Post-Embryonic Nervous System Development |journal=PLOS ONE |language=en |volume=9 |issue=4 |pages=e95435 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0095435 |doi-access=free |issn=1932-6203 |pmc=3988247 |pmid=24736377|bibcode=2014PLoSO...995435B }}

File:Nymphon-leptocheles.jpg]]

Sea spiders live in many different oceanic regions of the world, from Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific coast of the United States, to the Mediterranean Sea and the Caribbean Sea, to the north and south poles. They are most common in shallow waters, but can be found as deep as {{convert|7000|m}}, and live in both marine and estuarine habitats. Pycnogonids are well camouflaged beneath the rocks and among the algae that are found along shorelines.

Sea spiders are benthic in general, using their stilt-like legs to walk along the bottom, but they are also capable of swimming by using an umbrella pulsing motion,{{cite web|last=McClain|first=Craig|date=August 14, 2006|title=Sea Spiders|url=http://deepseanews.blogspot.com/2006/08/sea-spiders.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070709121802/http://deepseanews.blogspot.com/2006/08/sea-spiders.html|archive-date=9 July 2007|website=Deep Sea News Info}} and some Paleozoic species with flatten legs might even have a nektonic lifestyle. Sea spiders are mostly carnivorous predators or scavengers that feed on soft-bodied invertebrates such as cnidarians, sponges, polychaetes, and bryozoans, by inserting their proboscis into targeted prey item. Although they are known to feed on sea anemones, most sea anemones survive this ordeal, making the sea spider a parasite rather than a predator of sea anemones. A few species such as Nymphonella tapetis are specialised endoparasites of bivalve mollusks.{{Cite journal |last1=Miyazaki |first1=Katsumi |last2=Tomiyama |first2=Takeshi |last3=Yamada |first3=Katsumasa |last4=Tamaoki |first4=Masanori |date=2015-07-01 |title=18S Analysis of the Taxonomic Position of an Endoparasitic Pycnogonid, Nymphonella Tapetis (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida: Ascorhynchidae) |url=https://academic.oup.com/jcb/article/35/4/491/2547795 |journal=Journal of Crustacean Biology |volume=35 |issue=4 |pages=491–494 |doi=10.1163/1937240X-00002348 |bibcode=2015JCBio..35..491T |issn=0278-0372}}{{Cite journal |last1=Yamada |first1=Katsumasa |last2=Miyazaki |first2=Katsumi |last3=Tomiyama |first3=Takeshi |last4=Kanaya |first4=Gen |last5=Miyama |first5=Yoshifumi |last6=Yoshinaga |first6=Tomoyoshi |last7=Wakui |first7=Kunihiro |last8=Tamaoki |first8=Masanori |last9=Toba |first9=Mitsuharu |date=June 2018 |title=Impact of sea spider parasitism on host clams: susceptibility and intensity-dependent mortality |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-marine-biological-association-of-the-united-kingdom/article/abs/impact-of-sea-spider-parasitism-on-host-clams-susceptibility-and-intensitydependent-mortality/DA4547DECD7996BE63B58B576B7F656E |journal=Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom |language=en |volume=98 |issue=4 |pages=735–742 |doi=10.1017/S0025315417000200 |bibcode=2018JMBUK..98..735Y |issn=0025-3154|url-access=subscription }}

Not much is known about the primary predators of sea spiders, if any. At least some species have obvious defensive methods such as amputating and regenerating body parts,{{Cite journal |last1=Brenneis |first1=Georg |last2=Frankowski |first2=Karina |last3=Maaß |first3=Laura |last4=Scholtz |first4=Gerhard |date=2023-01-31 |title=The sea spider Pycnogonum litorale overturns the paradigm of the absence of axial regeneration in molting animals |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |language=en |volume=120 |issue=5 |pages=e2217272120 |doi=10.1073/pnas.2217272120 |doi-access=free |issn=0027-8424 |pmc=9946000 |pmid=36689663|bibcode=2023PNAS..12017272B }}{{Cite journal |last1=Petrova |first1=Maria |last2=Bogomolova |first2=Ekaterina |date=2023-11-01 |title=Walking leg regeneration in the sea spider Nymphon brevirostre Hodge, 1863 (Pycnogonida) |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1467803923000774 |journal=Arthropod Structure & Development |volume=77 |pages=101310 |doi=10.1016/j.asd.2023.101310 |bibcode=2023ArtSD..7701310P |issn=1467-8039|url-access=subscription }} or being unpleasant meals via high levels of ecdysteroids (ecdysis hormone).{{Cite journal |last=Tomaschko |first=K-H |date=1994-07-01 |title=Ecdysteroids fromPycnogonum litorale (Arthropoda, Pantopoda) act as chemical defense againstCarcinus maenas (Crustacea, Decapoda) |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02059872 |journal=Journal of Chemical Ecology |language=en |volume=20 |issue=7 |pages=1445–1455 |doi=10.1007/BF02059872 |pmid=24242643 |bibcode=1994JCEco..20.1445T |issn=1573-1561|url-access=subscription }} On the other hand, sea spiders are known to be infected by parasitic gastropod mollusks{{Cite journal |last1=Lehmann |first1=Tobias |last2=Gailer |first2=Juan P. |last3=Melzer |first3=Roland R. |last4=Schwabe |first4=Enrico |date=2007-01-01 |title=A scanning-electron microscopic study of Dickdellia labioflecta (Dell, 1990) (Gastropoda, Littorinoidea) on Colossendeis megalonyx megalonyx Fry and Hedgpeth, 1969 (Pycnogonida, Colossendeidae): a test for ectoparasitism |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00300-006-0178-6 |journal=Polar Biology |language=en |volume=30 |issue=2 |pages=243–248 |doi=10.1007/s00300-006-0178-6 |issn=1432-2056|url-access=subscription }}{{Cite journal |last1=Schiaparelli |first1=Stefano |last2=Oliverio |first2=Marco |last3=Taviani |first3=Marco |last4=Griffiths |first4=Huw |last5=Lörz |first5=Anne-Nina |last6=Albertelli |first6=Giancarlo |date=2008 |title=Short Note: Circumpolar distribution of the pycnogonid-ectoparasitic gastropod |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/antarctic-science/article/abs/short-note-circumpolar-distribution-of-the-pycnogonidectoparasitic-gastropod-dickdellia-labioflecta-dell-1990-mollusca-zerotulidae/C7C035ECB89CA05CCF62B80E82BABCC1 |journal=Antarctic Science |language=en |volume=20 |issue=5 |pages=497–498 |doi=10.1017/S0954102008001302 |issn=1365-2079|url-access=subscription }} or hitch‐rided by sessile animals such as goose barnacles, which may negatively affect their locomotion and respiratory efficiency.{{Cite journal |last1=Lane |first1=Steven J. |last2=Tobalske |first2=Bret W. |last3=Moran |first3=Amy L. |last4=Shishido |first4=Caitlin M. |last5=Woods |first5=H. Arthur |date=2018-08-01 |title=Costs of epibionts on Antarctic sea spiders |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00227-018-3389-9 |journal=Marine Biology |language=en |volume=165 |issue=8 |pages=137 |doi=10.1007/s00227-018-3389-9 |bibcode=2018MarBi.165..137L |issn=1432-1793|url-access=subscription }}

File:Expl0892 - Flickr - NOAA Photo Library.jpg]]

File:Tanystylum californicum 104577432.jpgAll sea spiders have separate sexes, except the only known hermaphroditic species Ascorhynchus corderoi and some extremely rare gynandromorph cases. Among all extant families, Austrodecidae and Rhynchothoracidae are the only two that still lack any observations on their reproductive behaviour and life cycle, as well as Colossendeidae until mid 2020s.{{Cite journal |last=Brenneis |first=Georg |last2=Wagner |first2=Daniel |date=2023-06-16 |title=Mating observation of giant sea spiders (Pycnogonida: Colossendeidae) |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-023-01350-3 |journal=Marine Biodiversity |language=en |volume=53 |issue=3 |pages=45 |doi=10.1007/s12526-023-01350-3 |issn=1867-1624}}{{Cite journal |last=Moran |first=Amy L. |last2=Lobert |first2=Graham T. |last3=Toh |first3=Ming Wei Aaron |date=2024 |title=Spawning and larval development of Colossendeis megalonyx, a giant Antarctic sea spider |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ecy.4258 |journal=Ecology |language=en |volume=105 |issue=3 |pages=e4258 |doi=10.1002/ecy.4258 |issn=1939-9170}} Reproduction involves external fertilisation when male and female stack together (usually male on top), exuding sperm and eggs from the gonopores of their respective leg coxae. After fertilisation, males glue the egg cluster with cement glands and using their ovigers (the oviger-lacking Nulloviger using only the ventral body wall) to carry the laid eggs and young. Colossendeidae is the only known exception that the egg mass was placed on substrate and well-camouflaged.File:Achelia spinosa (YPM IZ 077366) 004.jpeg

In most cases, the offsprings hatch as a distinct larval stage known as protonymphon. It has a blind gut and the body consists of a cephalon and its first three pairs of cephalic appendages only: the chelifores, palps and ovigers. In this stage, the chelifores usually have attachment glands, while the palps and ovigers are subequal, three-segmented appendages known as palpal and ovigeral larval limbs. When the larvae moult into the postlarval stage, they undergo transitional metamorphosis: the leg-bearing segments develop and the three pairs of cephalic appendages further develop or reduce. The postlarva eventually metamorphoses into a juvenile that looks like a miniature adult, which will continue to moult into an adult with a fixed number of walking legs.{{Cite journal |last1=Brenneis |first1=Georg |last2=Bogomolova |first2=Ekaterina V. |last3=Arango |first3=Claudia P. |last4=Krapp |first4=Franz |date=2017-02-07 |title=From egg to "no-body": an overview and revision of developmental pathways in the ancient arthropod lineage Pycnogonida |journal=Frontiers in Zoology |volume=14 |issue=1 |pages=6 |doi=10.1186/s12983-017-0192-2 |doi-access=free |issn=1742-9994 |pmc=5297176 |pmid=28191025}}{{Cite journal |last1=Alexeeva |first1=Nina |last2=Tamberg |first2=Yuta |last3=Shunatova |first3=Natalia |date=2018-05-01 |title=Postembryonic development of pycnogonids: A deeper look inside |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S146780391830029X |journal=Arthropod Structure & Development |volume=47 |issue=3 |pages=299–317 |doi=10.1016/j.asd.2018.03.002 |pmid=29524544 |bibcode=2018ArtSD..47..299A |issn=1467-8039|url-access=subscription }} In Pycnogonidae, the ovigers are reduced in juveniles but reappear in oviger-bearing adult males.

These kind of "head-only" larvae and its anamorphic metamorphosis resemble crustacean nauplius larvae and megacheiran larvae, all together might reflects how the larvae of a common ancestor of all arthropods developed: starting its life as a tiny animal with a few head appendages, while new body segments and appendages were gradually added as it was growing.{{Cite journal |last1=Liu |first1=Yu |last2=Melzer |first2=Roland R. |last3=Haug |first3=Joachim T. |last4=Haug |first4=Carolin |last5=Briggs |first5=Derek E. G. |last6=Hörnig |first6=Marie K. |last7=He |first7=Yu-yang |last8=Hou |first8=Xian-guang |date=2016-05-17 |title=Three-dimensionally preserved minute larva of a great-appendage arthropod from the early Cambrian Chengjiang biota |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |language=en |volume=113 |issue=20 |pages=5542–5546 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1522899113 |doi-access=free |issn=0027-8424 |pmc=4878483 |pmid=27140601|bibcode=2016PNAS..113.5542L }}

Further details of the postembryonic developments of sea spiders vary, but their categorization might differ between literatures. As of the 2010s, there are five types identified as follows:

The type 1 (typical protonymphon) is the most common and possibly an ancestral one. When the type 2 and 5 (attaching larva) hatches it immediately attaches itself to the ovigers of the father, where it will stay until it has turned into a small and young juvenile with two or three pairs of walking legs ready for a free-living existence. The type 3 (atypical protonymphon) have limited observations. The adults are free living, while the larvae and the juveniles are living on or inside temporary hosts such as polychaetes and clams. The type 4 (encysted larva) is a parasite that hatches from the egg and finds a host in the shape of a polyp colony where it burrows into and turns into a cyst, and will not leave the host before it has turned into a young juvenile.{{cite journal |last1=Bain |first1=B. A. |date=2003 |title=Larval types and a summary of postembryonic development within the pycnogonids |journal=Invertebrate Reproduction & Development |volume=43 |issue=3 |pages=193–222 |bibcode=2003InvRD..43..193B |doi=10.1080/07924259.2003.9652540 |s2cid=84345599}}

{{cladogram

|title=

|align= right

|caption=Best-supported position of Pycnogonida

|cladogram=

{{clade| style=width:30em;font-size:100%;line-height:100%

|1={{clade

|label1=Chelicerata|1={{clade

|1=Pycnogonida

|label2=Euchelicerata|2=Xiphosura and Arachnida

}}

|label2=Mandibulata|2={{clade

|1=Myriapoda

|label2=Pancrustacea|2=Crustacea and Hexapoda

}} }} }} }}

{{cladogram

|title=

|align= right

|caption=Cormogonida hypothesis

|cladogram=

{{clade| style=width:30em;font-size:100%;line-height:100%

|1={{clade

|1=Pycnogonida

|label2=Cormogonida |2={{clade

|label1=Euchelicerata|1=Xiphosura and Arachnida

|2=Myriapoda

|label3=Pancrustacea|3=Crustacea and Hexapoda

}} }} }} }}

Sea spiders had been interpreted as some kind of arachnids or crustaceans in historical studies. However, after the concept of Chelicerata being established in 20th century, sea spiders have long been considered part of the subphylum, alongside euchelicerate taxa such as Xiphosura (horseshoe crabs) and Arachnida (spiders, scorpions, mites, ticks, harvestmen and other lesser-known orders).{{Cite book |last1=Margulis |first1=Lynn |author-link=Lynn Margulis |last2=Schwartz |first2=Karlene |title=Five Kingdoms, An Illustrated Guide to the Phyla of Life on Earth |publisher=W.H. Freeman and Company |year=1998 |edition=third |isbn=978-0-7167-3027-9 |url-access=registration |url=https://archive.org/details/fivekingdomsillu00marg_0 }}{{page needed|date=March 2015}}

A competing hypothesis around 2000s proposes that Pycnogonida belong to their own lineage, sister to the lineage lead to other extant arthropods (i.e. euchelicerates, myriapods, crustaceans and hexapods, collectively known as Cormogonida). This Cormogonida hypothesis was first indicated by early phylogenomic analysis aroud that time, followed by another study suggest that the sea spider's chelifores are not positionally homologous to the chelicerae of euchelicerates (originated from the deutocerebral segment/somite 1), as was previously supposed. Instead, the chelifore nerves were thought to be innervated by the protocerebrum, the first segment of the arthropod brain which corresponded to the ocular somite, bearing the eyes and labrum. This condition of having paired protocerebral appendages is not found anywhere else among arthropods, except in other panarthropods such as onychophoran (primary antennae) and contestably{{Cite journal |last1=Moysiuk |first1=Joseph |last2=Caron |first2=Jean-Bernard |date=2022-08-08 |title=A three-eyed radiodont with fossilized neuroanatomy informs the origin of the arthropod head and segmentation |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982222009861 |journal=Current Biology |volume=32 |issue=15 |pages=3302–3316.e2 |doi=10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.027 |pmid=35809569 |bibcode=2022CBio...32E3302M |issn=0960-9822|doi-access=free }} in Cambrian stem-group arthropods like radiodonts (frontal appendages), which was taken as evidence that Pycnogonida may be basal than all other living arthropods, since the protocerebral appendages were thought to be reduced and fused into a labrum in the last common ancestor of crown-group arthropods, and pycnogonids did not have a labrum coexist with the chelifores. If that's true, it would have meant the sea spiders are the last surviving (and highly modified) members of an ancient, basal arthropods that originated in Cambrian oceans.{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/nature03984 |pmid=16237442 |title=Neuroanatomy of sea spiders implies an appendicular origin of the protocerebral segment |journal=Nature |volume=437 |issue=7062 |pages=1144–8 |year=2005 |last1=Maxmen |first1=Amy |last2=Browne |first2=William E. |last3=Martindale |first3=Mark Q. |last4=Giribet |first4=Gonzalo |bibcode=2005Natur.437.1144M |s2cid=4400419 }} However, the basis of this hypothesis was immediately refuted by subsequent studies using Hox gene expression patterns, demonstrated the developmental homology between chelicerae and chelifores, with chelifore nerves innervated by a deuterocerebrum that has been rotated forwards, which was misinterpreted as protocerebrum by the aforementioned study.{{cite journal |doi=10.1038/nature04591 |pmid=16724066 |title=Homology of arthropod anterior appendages revealed by Hox gene expression in a sea spider |journal=Nature |volume=441 |issue=7092 |pages=506–8 |year=2006 |last1=Jager |first1=Muriel |last2=Murienne |first2=Jérôme |last3=Clabaut |first3=Céline |last4=Deutsch |first4=Jean |last5=Guyader |first5=Hervé Le |last6=Manuel |first6=Michaël |bibcode=2006Natur.441..506J |s2cid=4307398 }}{{Cite web|title=Chelifores, chelicerae, and invertebrate evolution | ScienceBlogs|url=https://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/05/26/chelifores-chelicerae-and-inve|access-date=2022-01-10|website=scienceblogs.com}}{{Cite journal |last1=Brenneis |first1=Georg |last2=Ungerer |first2=Petra |last3=Scholtz |first3=Gerhard |date=2008-10-27 |title=The chelifores of sea spiders (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) are the appendages of the deutocerebral segment: Chelifores of sea spiders |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00285.x |journal=Evolution & Development |language=en |volume=10 |issue=6 |pages=717–724 |doi=10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00285.x|pmid=19021742 |s2cid=6048195 |url-access=subscription }}

File:20191107 Panarthropoda head segments appendages extant en.png

Since 2010s, the chelicerate affinity of Pycnogonida regain wide support as the sister group of Euchelicerata. Under the basis of phylogenomics, this is one of the only stable topology of chelicerate interrelationships in contrast to the uncertain relationship of many euchelicerate taxa (e.g. poorly resolved position of arachnid orders other than tetrapulmonates and scorpions; non-monophyly of Arachnida in respect to Xiphosura).{{cite journal |last1=Regier |first1=Jerome C. |last2=Shultz |first2=Jeffrey W. |last3=Zwick |first3=Andreas |last4=Hussey |first4=April |last5=Ball |first5=Bernard |last6=Wetzer |first6=Regina |last7=Martin |first7=Joel W. |last8=Cunningham |first8=Clifford W. |year=2010 |title=Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences |journal=Nature |volume=463 |issue=7284 |pages=1079–83 |bibcode=2010Natur.463.1079R |doi=10.1038/nature08742 |pmid=20147900 |s2cid=4427443}}{{Cite journal |last1=Sharma |first1=Prashant P. |last2=Kaluziak |first2=Stefan T. |last3=Pérez-Porro |first3=Alicia R. |last4=González |first4=Vanessa L. |last5=Hormiga |first5=Gustavo |last6=Wheeler |first6=Ward C. |last7=Giribet |first7=Gonzalo |date=November 2014 |title=Phylogenomic Interrogation of Arachnida Reveals Systemic Conflicts in Phylogenetic Signal |url=https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/molbev/msu235 |journal=Molecular Biology and Evolution |language=en |volume=31 |issue=11 |pages=2963–2984 |doi=10.1093/molbev/msu235 |pmid=25107551 |issn=1537-1719|doi-access=free }}{{Cite journal |last1=Ballesteros |first1=Jesús A |last2=Sharma |first2=Prashant P |date=2019-11-01 |editor-last=Halanych |editor-first=Ken |title=A Critical Appraisal of the Placement of Xiphosura (Chelicerata) with Account of Known Sources of Phylogenetic Error |url=https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article/68/6/896/5319972 |journal=Systematic Biology |language=en |volume=68 |issue=6 |pages=896–917 |doi=10.1093/sysbio/syz011 |pmid=30917194 |issn=1063-5157|doi-access=free }}{{Cite journal |last1=Ballesteros |first1=Jesús A. |last2=Santibáñez López |first2=Carlos E. |last3=Kováč |first3=Ľubomír |last4=Gavish-Regev |first4=Efrat |last5=Sharma |first5=Prashant P. |date=2019-12-18 |title=Ordered phylogenomic subsampling enables diagnosis of systematic errors in the placement of the enigmatic arachnid order Palpigradi |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |language=en |volume=286 |issue=1917 |pages=20192426 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2019.2426 |issn=0962-8452 |pmc=6939912 |pmid=31847768}}{{Cite journal |last1=Ballesteros |first1=Jesús A |last2=Santibáñez-López |first2=Carlos E |last3=Baker |first3=Caitlin M |last4=Benavides |first4=Ligia R |last5=Cunha |first5=Tauana J |last6=Gainett |first6=Guilherme |last7=Ontano |first7=Andrew Z |last8=Setton |first8=Emily V W |last9=Arango |first9=Claudia P |last10=Gavish-Regev |first10=Efrat |last11=Harvey |first11=Mark S |last12=Wheeler |first12=Ward C |last13=Hormiga |first13=Gustavo |last14=Giribet |first14=Gonzalo |last15=Sharma |first15=Prashant P |date=2022-02-03 |editor-last=Teeling |editor-first=Emma |title=Comprehensive Species Sampling and Sophisticated Algorithmic Approaches Refute the Monophyly of Arachnida |url=https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/doi/10.1093/molbev/msac021/6522129 |journal=Molecular Biology and Evolution |language=en |volume=39 |issue=2 |pages=msac021 |doi=10.1093/molbev/msac021 |issn=0737-4038 |pmc=8845124 |pmid=35137183}} This is consistent with the chelifore-chelicera homology, as well as other morphological similarities and differences between pycnogonids and euchelicerates.{{cite journal |doi=10.1111/j.1439-0469.2004.00284.x |title=Pycnogonid affinities: A review |journal=Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research |volume=43 |pages=8–21 |year=2005 |last1=Dunlop |first1=J. A. |last2=Arango |first2=C. P. |citeseerx=10.1.1.714.8297 }} However, due to pycnogonid's highly modified anatomy and lack of intermediate fossils, their evolutional origin and relationship with the basal fossil chelicerates (such as habeliids and Mollisonia) are still difficult to compare and interpret.{{Cite journal |last1=Aria |first1=Cédric |last2=Caron |first2=Jean-Bernard |date=2019 |title=A middle Cambrian arthropod with chelicerae and proto-book gills |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1525-4 |journal=Nature |language=en |volume=573 |issue=7775 |pages=586–589 |doi=10.1038/s41586-019-1525-4 |pmid=31511691 |bibcode=2019Natur.573..586A |issn=1476-4687|url-access=subscription }}

{{cladogram

|title=

|align= right

|caption= Internal phylogeny of Pycnogonida.

|cladogram=

{{clade| style=width:35em;font-size:90%;line-height:100%

|1={{clade

|state1=double|label1=?|1=stem-groups (e.g. Palaeoisopus, Flagellopantopus, Palaeopantopus)

|label2=Pantopoda|2={{clade

|label1=Stiripasterida|1=Austrodecidae

|label2=Eupantopodida|2={{clade

|1={{clade

|label1=Colossendeoidea|1={{clade

|1=Colossendeidae

|2={{clade

|1=Rhynchothoracidae

|2=Pycnogonidae

}} }} }}

|2={{clade

|1={{clade

|label1=Phoxichilidioidea|1={{clade

|1=Endeidae

|2=Phoxichilidiidae

}}

|label2=Ammotheoidea|2={{clade

|1=Pallenopsidae

|2=Ammotheidae

}} }}

|label2=?|2=Ascorhynchidae
(including Nymphonella?)

|3={{clade|label1=Nymphonoidea|1={{clade

|state1=double|1=Callipallenidae
(paraphyletic)

|2=Nymphonidae

}} }} }} }} }} }} }} }}

The class Pycnogonida comprises over 1,300 species, which are split into over 80 genera. All extant genera are considered part of the single order Pantopoda, which was subdivided into 11 families. Historically there are only 9 families, with species of nowadays Ascorhynchidae placed under Ammotheidae and Pallenopsidae under Callipallenidae. Both were eventually separated after they are considered distinct from the once-belonged families.

Phylogenomic analysis of extant sea spiders was able to establish a backbone tree for Pantopoda, revealing some consistent relationship such as the basal position of Austrodecidae, monophyly of some major branches (later redefined as superfamilies{{Cite journal |last1=Sabroux |first1=Romain |last2=Corbari |first2=Laure |last3=Hassanin |first3=Alexandre |date=2023-05-01 |title=Phylogeny of sea spiders (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida) inferred from mitochondrial genome and 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequences |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S105579032300026X |journal=Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution |volume=182 |pages=107726 |doi=10.1016/j.ympev.2023.107726 |bibcode=2023MolPE.18207726S |issn=1055-7903}}) and the paraphyly of Callipallenidae in respect to Nymphonidae.{{Cite journal |last=Hassanin |first=Alexandre |date=2010-01-01 |title=Studying Sources of Incongruence In Arthropod Molecular Phylogenies: Sea Spiders (Pycnogonida) As a Case Study |url=https://www.academia.edu/458876 |journal=Comptes Rendus Biologies}}{{Cite journal |last1=Ballesteros |first1=Jesús A |last2=Setton |first2=Emily V W |last3=Santibáñez-López |first3=Carlos E |last4=Arango |first4=Claudia P |last5=Brenneis |first5=Georg |last6=Brix |first6=Saskia |last7=Corbett |first7=Kevin F |last8=Cano-Sánchez |first8=Esperanza |last9=Dandouch |first9=Merai |last10=Dilly |first10=Geoffrey F |last11=Eleaume |first11=Marc P |last12=Gainett |first12=Guilherme |last13=Gallut |first13=Cyril |last14=McAtee |first14=Sean |last15=McIntyre |first15=Lauren |date=2021-01-23 |editor-last=Crandall |editor-first=Keith |title=Phylogenomic Resolution of Sea Spider Diversification through Integration of Multiple Data Classes |url=https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/38/2/686/5904272 |journal=Molecular Biology and Evolution |language=en |volume=38 |issue=2 |pages=686–701 |doi=10.1093/molbev/msaa228 |issn=1537-1719 |pmc=7826184 |pmid=32915961}} The topology also suggest Pantopoda undergoing multiple times of cephalic appendage reduction/reappearance and polymerous species acquisition, contray to previous hypothesis on pantopod evolution (cephalic appendages were thought to be progressively reduced along the branches, and polymerus condition were though to be ancestral). On the other hand, the position of Ascorhynchidae and Nymphonella are less certain across multiple results.

The position of Paleozoic pycnogonids are poorly examined, but most, if not, all of them most likely represent members of stem-group basal than Pantopoda (crown-group Pycnogonida), especially those with segmented abdomen, a feature that was most likely ancestral and reduce in the Pantopoda lineage.{{Cite journal |last1=Bergström |first1=Jan |last2=Stürmer |first2=Wilhelm |last3=Winter |first3=Gerhard |date=1980 |title=Palaeoisopus, Palaeopantopus and Palaeothea, pycnogonid arthropods from the Lower Devonian Hunsriick Slate, West Germany |url=https://www.academia.edu/5146832 |journal=Paläontologische Zeitschrift |volume=54 |issue=1–2 |pages=7 |doi=10.1007/BF02985882 |bibcode=1980PalZ...54....7B |issn=0031-0220}}{{Cite journal |last1=Kühl |first1=Gabriele |last2=Poschmann |first2=Markus |last3=Rust |first3=Jes |date=2013 |title=A ten-legged sea spider (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida) from the Lower Devonian Hunsrück Slate (Germany) |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/geological-magazine/article/abs/tenlegged-sea-spider-arthropoda-pycnogonida-from-the-lower-devonian-hunsruck-slate-germany/49C52AA72ABDF4B6E8DF2F572C0D51AE |journal=Geological Magazine |language=en |volume=150 |issue=3 |pages=556–564 |doi=10.1017/S0016756812001033 |bibcode=2013GeoM..150..556K |issn=0016-7568|url-access=subscription }} While some phylogenetic analysis placing them within Pantopoda, this result is questionable as they have low support values and based on outdated interpretation of the fossil taxa.{{Cite journal |last1=Siveter |first1=Derek J. |last2=Sabroux |first2=Romain |last3=Briggs |first3=Derek E. G. |last4=Siveter |first4=David J. |last5=Sutton |first5=Mark D. |date=2023 |title=Newly discovered morphology of the Silurian sea spider Haliestes and its implications |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/spp2.1528 |journal=Papers in Palaeontology |language=en |volume=9 |issue=5 |doi=10.1002/spp2.1528 |bibcode=2023PPal....9E1528S |issn=2056-2799|hdl=1983/267d44cb-bd22-4a1d-9d00-b3916c453784 |hdl-access=free }}{{Cite journal |last1=Sabroux |first1=Romain |last2=Garwood |first2=Russell J. |last3=Pisani |first3=Davide |last4=Donoghue |first4=Philip C. J. |last5=Edgecombe |first5=Gregory D. |date=2024-10-14 |title=New insights into the Devonian sea spiders of the Hunsrück Slate (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida) |journal=PeerJ |language=en |volume=12 |pages=e17766 |doi=10.7717/peerj.17766 |doi-access=free |pmid=39421419 |pmc=11485130 |issn=2167-8359}}

According to the World Register of Marine Species, the Class Pycnogonida is subdivided as follows{{Cite web |title=WoRMS - World Register of Marine Species - Pycnogonida |url=https://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1302 |access-date=2024-12-15 |website=marinespecies.org}} (with subsequent updates on fossil taxa after Sabroux et al. (2023, 2024)):

• Genus †Cambropycnogon Waloszek & Dunlop, 2002
• Genus †Flagellopantopus Poschmann & Dunlop, 2005 (classified under Pantopoda incertae sedis by WoRMS)
• Genus †Haliestes Siveter et al., 2004 (previously classified under Order Nectopantpoda Bamber, 2007 and Family Haliestidae Bamber, 2007)
• Genus †Palaeoisopus Broili, 1928 (Previously classified under Order Palaeoisopoda Hedgpeth, 1978 and Family Palaeoisopodidae Dubinin, 1957)
• Genus †Palaeomarachne Rudkin et al., 2013
• Genus †Palaeopantopus Broili, 1929 (Previously classified under Order Palaeopantopoda Broili, 1930 and Family Palaeopantopodidae Hedgpeth, 1955)
• Genus †Palaeothea Bergstrom, Sturmer & Winter, 1980 (previously classified under Pantopoda, potential nomen dubium)
• Genus †Pentapantopus Kühl, Poschmann & Rust, 2013 (previously classified under Pantopoda)
• Order Pantopoda Gerstäcker, 1863{{Cite web |title=WoRMS - World Register of Marine Species - Pantopoda |url=https://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1358 |access-date=2024-12-15 |website=marinespecies.org}}
• Suborder Eupantopodida Fry, 1978{{Cite web |title=WoRMS - World Register of Marine Species - Eupantopodida |url=https://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=379601 |access-date=2024-12-15 |website=marinespecies.org}}
• Superfamily Ammotheoidea Dohrn, 1881
• Family Ammotheidae Dohrn, 1881
• Family Pallenopsidae Fry, 1978
• Superfamily Ascorhynchoidea Pocock, 1904
• Family Ascorhynchidae Hoek, 1881 (=Eurycydidae Sars, 1891)
• Superfamily Colossendeoidea Hoek, 1881 (=Pycnogonoidea Pocock, 1904; Rhynchothoracoidea Fry, 1978)
• Family Colossendeidae Jarzynsky, 1870
• Family Pycnogonidae Wilson, 1878
• Family Rhynchothoracidae Thompson, 1909
• Superfamily Nymphonoidea Pocock, 1904
• Family Callipallenidae Hilton, 1942
• Family Nymphonidae Wilson, 1878
• Superfamily Phoxichilidioidea Sars, 1891
• Family Endeidae Norman, 1908
• Family Phoxichilidiidae Sars, 1891
• Suborder Stiripasterida Fry, 1978{{Cite web |title=WoRMS - World Register of Marine Species - Stiripasterida |url=https://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=379600 |access-date=2024-12-05 |website=marinespecies.org}}
• Family Austrodecidae Stock, 1954
• Suborder incertae sedis{{Cite web |title=WoRMS - World Register of Marine Species - Pantopoda incertae sedis |url=https://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=150518 |access-date=2024-12-15 |website=marinespecies.org}}
• Family †Palaeopycnogonididae Sabroux, Edgecombe, Pisani & Garwood, 2023
• Genus Alcynous Costa, 1861 (nomen dubium)
• Genus Foxichilus Costa, 1836 (nomen dubium)
• Genus Oiceobathys Hesse, 1867 (nomen dubium)
• Genus Oomerus Hesse, 1874 (nomen dubium)
• Genus Paritoca Philippi, 1842 (nomen dubium)
• Genus Pephredro Goodsir, 1842 (nomen dubium)
• Genus Phanodemus Costa, 1836 (nomen dubium)
• Genus Platychelus Costa, 1861 (nomen dubium)

File:20200603 Cambropycnogon klausmuelleri.png]]

File:20200503 Palaeoisopus problematicus.png]]

File:Muséum de l'Ardèche pycnogonide colossendeidae cropped.jpg

The fossil record of pycnogonids is scant, represented only by a handful of fossil sites with exceptional preservation (Lagerstätte). While most of them are discovered from Paleozoic era, unambiguous evidence of crown-group (Pantopoda) only restricted to Mesozoic era.

The earliest fossils are Cambropycnogon discovered from the Cambrian 'Orsten' of Sweden (ca. 500 Ma). So far only its protonymphon larvae had been described, featuring some traits unknown from other pycnogonids such as paired anterior projections, gnathobasic larval limbs and annulated terminal appendages.{{Cite journal |last1=Waloszek |first1=Dieter |last2=Dunlop |first2=Jason A. |date=2002 |title=A Larval Sea Spider (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida) from the Upper Cambrian 'orsten' of Sweden, and the Phylogenetic Position of Pycnogonids |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-4983.00244 |journal=Palaeontology |language=en |volume=45 |issue=3 |pages=421–446 |doi=10.1111/1475-4983.00244 |bibcode=2002Palgy..45..421W |issn=1475-4983|url-access=subscription }} Due to its distinct morphology, some studies have argued that this genus is not a pycnogonid at all.

Ordovician pycnogonids are only known by Palaeomarachne (ca. 450 Ma), a genus found in William Lake Provincial Park, Manitoba and described in 2013. It only preserve possible moults of the fragmental body segments, with one showing an apparently segmented head region.

{{cite journal

|last1=Rudkin |first1=Dave |last2=Cuggy |first2=Michael B.

|last3=Young |first3=Graham A. |last4=Thompson |first4=Deborah P.

|year=2013

|title=An Ordovician pycnogonid (sea spider) with serially subdivided 'head' region

|journal=Journal of Paleontology

|volume=87 |issue=3 |pages=395–405

|bibcode=2013JPal...87..395R

|doi=10.1666/12-057.1 |s2cid=83924778

|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236592691

|access-date=23 September 2017

}}

However, just like Cambropycnogon, its pycnogonid affinity was questioned by some studies as well.

The Silurian Coalbrookdale Formation of England (Haliestes, ca. 425 Ma) and the Devonian Hunsrück Slate of Germany (Flagellopantopus, Palaeopantopus, Palaeoisopus, Palaeothea and Pentapantopus, ca. 400 Ma) include unambigious fossil pycnogonids with exceptional preservation. The latter is by far the most diverse community of fossil pycnogonids in terms of both species number and morphology. Some of them are significant in that they possess something never seen in pantopods: annulated coxae, flatten swimming legs, segmented abdomen and elongated telson. These provide some clues on the evolution of sea spider bodyplan before the arose and diversification of Pantopoda.

Fossil of Mesozoic pycnogonids are even rare, and so far all of them are Jurassic pantopods. Historically there are two genus (Pentapalaeopycnon and Pycnogonites) from the Solnhofen Limestone (ca. 150 Ma) of Germany being described as such, which are in fact misidentified phyllosoma larvae of decapod crustaceans. The actual first report of Mesozoic pycnogonids was described by researchers from the University of Lyon in 2007, discovering 3 new genus (Palaeopycnogonides, Colossopantopodus and Palaeoendeis) from La Voulte-sur-Rhône of Jurassic La Voulte Lagerstätte (ca. 160 Ma), south-east France. The discovery fill in an enormous fossil gap in the record between Devonian and extant sea spiders.{{Cite journal |last1=Charbonnier |first1=S |last2=Vannier |first2=J |last3=Riou |first3=B |date=2007-08-14 |title=New sea spiders from the Jurassic La Voulte-sur-Rhône Lagerstätte |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |volume=274 |issue=1625 |pages=2555–2561 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2007.0848 |pmc=2275891 |pmid=17698484}}{{cite news |date=16 August 2007 |title=Fossil sea spiders thrill experts |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6948161.stm |access-date=3 Nov 2024 |publisher=British Broadcasting Corporation |series=BBC News}} In 2019, a new species of Colossopantopodus and a specimen possibly belong to the extant genus Eurycyde were discovered from the aforementioned Solnhofen limestone.{{Cite journal |last1=Sabroux |first1=Romain |last2=Audo |first2=Denis |last3=Charbonnier |first3=Sylvain |last4=Corbari |first4=Laure |last5=Hassanin |first5=Alexandre |date=2019-11-17 |title=150-million-year-old sea spiders (Pycnogonida: Pantopoda) of Solnhofen |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14772019.2019.1571534 |journal=Journal of Systematic Palaeontology |language=en |volume=17 |issue=22 |pages=1927–1938 |doi=10.1080/14772019.2019.1571534 |bibcode=2019JSPal..17.1927S |issn=1477-2019}}

{{reflist}}

{{Portal|Arthropods}}

• {{Cite EB1911|wstitle=Pycnogonida|short=x}}
• PycnoBase: [http://www.marinespecies.org/pycnobase/ World list of Pycnogonida]
• [http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/arthropoda/pycnogonida.html Introduction to the Pycnogonida]
• [http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/pickover/pycno.htm Images of Pycnogonida, and Pycnogonids in literature]
• [http://franz.krapp.org Bibliography (compiled by Franz Krapp)]

{{Arthropods}}

{{Taxonbar|from1=Q19106|from2=Q874792}}

{{Authority control}}

Category:Extant Cambrian first appearances

Category:Taxa named by Carl Eduard Adolph Gerstaecker