Talk:Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2002/GA1
GA Review
{{atopg
| status =
| result = Passed. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 13:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
{{pb}}
I'll take this review. If you have time, please consider starting one of your own: the backlog at WP:GAN is long. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
:I'm just visiting this to give the polite suggestion a reviewer takes a good look at source adherence. Kingsif (talk) 03:00, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
::That is the basic duty of a GA reviewer {{u|Kingsif}}, and I will additionally note that your article was nominated by a different editor than for this one. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- :A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: {{GAList/check|hold}}
- ::
- :B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch,
fiction, and list incorporation: {{GAList/check|yes}} - ::
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- :A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: {{GAList/check|y}}
- ::
- :B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: {{GAList/check|hold}}
- :: See #Comments below.
- :C. It contains no original research: {{GAList/check|y}}
- ::
- :D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: {{GAList/check|y}}
- ::
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- :A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: {{GAList/check|y}}
- ::
- :B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): {{GAList/check|y}}
- ::
- Is it neutral?
- :It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: {{GAList/check|y}}
- ::
- Is it stable?
- : It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: {{GAList/check|y}}
- ::
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- :A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: {{GAList/check|y}}
- ::
- :B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: {{GAList/check|y}}
- ::
- Overall:
- :Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|hold}}
- :: See #Comments below.
=Random source spot-check=
- 2 fine
- 3 fine
- 10 AGF but based on basic Greek knowledge, probably fine
- 17 fine
- 25 fine
- 28 not sure if it's necessary, but it's fine source-text-wise
;Spot-check passed
=Comments=
- "Ellinikós Telikós 2002 was the Greek national final developed by ERT" is somewhat unclear. "Final" as in final competition? Do you "develop" a final?
- I have edited a couple of sentences for better grammar/punctuation/clarity.
- "Ten songs competed" songs don't compete—perhaps performers or artists do?
- Is the youtube citation really necessary?
Putting this on temporary hold; just a few comments to resolve. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
:{{ping|AirshipJungleman29}} Thanks for the review! I piped national final to National selections for the Eurovision Song Contest. I guess I hadn't realized that it was a jargony term. I changed the "songs" to "entries". I want to say performers, but since some songs were by groups that got weird. The Youtube link is more of a courtesy. I could just cite the existence of the event itself without a link, but since the Youtube video was posted by the broadcaster itself, I included it for additional verifiability; it serves as the only ref for some of the info. Grk1011 (talk) 13:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
{{abot}}