Talk:Iyarkai/GA2

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Iyarkai/GA2|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Iyarkai/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Veera Narayana (talk · contribs) 12:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

{{pb}}

Here are some of my concerns with this article. Please resolve them and let me know. Veera Narayana 12:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

• I would suggest you inform the readers first that the film is based on a book and then summarise what the film is about, instead of the other way aroudn we see in this article.
• Please do not mention low budget in the lead, and write the actual budget itself. We need not make such mentions, unless it is a no-budget film like Christopher Nolan{{'s}} Following.
• "Marudhu befriends Nancy and helps her search for Mukundan but when Marudhu reveals that he loves Nancy, she distances herself from him. They reconcile and become friends." -- This line can be phrased better. I leave it to you how, but for the way it is, the line is very clumsy.
• "The story is based on Jananathan's friend's uncle, who right after getting married, went alone on a boat voyage in the Mediterranean Sea and got lost while his wife awaited his return." -- So, the film is not based on a book? If yes, please provide a vlid reference and the details of the subplots inspired from that book. Or remove those details from the lead entirely, and replace them by a summary of the Production section.
• Mention who Ramkumar Ganesan is. As in, a filmmaker or a film producer and distributor etc.
• If i get it right, "Kutti" means small or young in Tamil. Please let non-Tamil readers knwow the same.

:{{ping|Veera Narayana}} I have tried to address all of your concerns. Since I could not find any source to support the fact that "the subplot involving a man having unrequited love for a woman" is based on the book "White Nights", I have removed it. DareshMohan (talk) 23:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

::In my honest opinion, this article would need more expansion. Having said that, my own searches gave very limited results, and from what you managed to gather here is definitely a good work. Recognising such work here is of paramount importance, hence i promote this one. In the future, though, do try to expand this article whenever you can. Congratulations! Veera Narayana 06:06, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.
2. : a. (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check| y }}
3. ::
4. ::
5. : b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check| y }}
6. ::
7. ::
8. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
9. : a. (reference section): {{GAList/check| y }}
10. ::
    1. ::
    2. : b. (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check| y }}
    3. ::
       1. ::
       2. : c. (OR): {{GAList/check| y }}
       3. ::
       4. ::
       5. : d. (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check| y }}
       6. ::
       7. ::
       8. It is broad in its coverage.
       9. : a. (major aspects): {{GAList/check| y }}
       10. ::
           1. ::
           2. : b. (focused): {{GAList/check| y }}
           3. ::
              1. ::
              2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
              3. : Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check| y }}
              4. ::
              5. ::
              6. It is stable.
              7. : No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check| y }}
              8. ::
                 1. ::
                 2. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
                 3. : a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): {{GAList/check| y }}
                 4. ::
                 5. ::
                 6. : b. (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check| y }}
                 7. ::
                 8. ::
                 9. Overall:
                 10. : Pass/fail: {{GAList/check| y }}
                 11. ::
                 12. ::

                 (Criteria marked 14px are unassessed)